Anti-HPA-9bw (Maxa+) Feto-Maternal Alloimmunization and Clinically Severe Neonatal Thrombocytopenia: Difficulties in Diagnosis and Therapy, Report on 12 Cases.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 2066-2066
Author(s):  
Cecile Kaplan-Gouet ◽  
Leendert Porcelijn ◽  
Philippe Vanlieferinghen ◽  
Eric Julien ◽  
Frederic Bianchi ◽  
...  

Abstract Since the first documented case of neonatal thrombocytopenia (NAIT) due to anti HPA-9bw (Maxa+)1, no clinical data report has appeared in the literature. We have conducted a retrospective analysis of the cases referred to the INTS (Paris) in the recent years. This analysis confirms that anti HPA-9bw (Maxa+) NAIT is a clinically severe syndrome which requires prompt diagnosis, in spite of difficulties, and maternal platelet transfusion therapy. This report concerns 8 families (12 neonates) investigated for neonatal thrombocytopenia (initial case included). The diagnosis was performed by genotyping and identification of the maternal alloantibody. The maternal sera reacted with paternal platelets in the MAIPA technique with anti GPIIb-IIIa monoclonal antibodies. No reaction was observed with a standard panel of typed donors and with their own platelets. In 2 families the diagnosis was ascertained retrospectively and the maternal alloantibody not detectable few months after delivery. Platelet genotyping did not show incompatibilities for the known platelet specific alloantigen systems HPA-1 to 11 and HPA-15 when tested in 7 out of 8 families. In the last one, incompatibility was found for HPA-3 without anti HPA-3b maternal alloantibody. As the father was HPA-9bw heterozygous in all the cases, the infant or fetus was genotyped to ascertain the diagnosis. In 10/12 cases, the infant was incompatible with the mother and therefore the diagnosis was straightforward. Four index cases were first-born children. Hemorrhage was present in 5/9 neonates, all but two infants had severe thrombocytopenia at birth, platelet counts<20.109/l and intracranial hemorrhage was documented in 1 patient, otherwise sonograms were normal. When bleeding was present maternal platelet transfusion therapy was given, most of the time because of poor response to random platelet transfusion. In 3 families successive pregnancies were followed up. In one case the fetus was compatible , in another case the 2nd child was moderately affected and in the last case maternal antenatal therapy (IvIgG) was given for fetal thrombocytopenia. Since 1999 we screen for the potential implication of rare antigens in suspected cases of NAIT when there is no other incompatibility. This screening has led us to characterize a new platelet antigen2. Anti HPA-9bw NAIT accounts for ~2% of our confirmed NAIT cases (parental antigen incompatibilities and presence of maternal alloantibodies). Difficulties in laboratory diagnosis for HPA-9bw NAIT mainly relies on the identification of the alloantibody and the paternal heterozygous status for the antigen. We have observed that monoclonal antibodies could interfere with the alloantibody binding in the MAIPA technique leading to false negative results. The diagnosis could only be confirmed after infant genotyping, in our series we have found 1 neonate and 1 fetus compatible with their mother excluding this antigen to be implicated in fetal/neonatal thrombocytopenia. In conclusion, laboratory investigation of a suspected NAIT case should be carried out in a well-versed laboratory for optimal testing. Therapy requires a strict collaboration between clinicians and blood bank services. Appropriate management and antenatal therapy should be considered for successive pregnancies to prevent fetal bleeding.

Author(s):  
Rania A. Zayed ◽  
Dalia Omran ◽  
Abeer A. Zayed

Abstract Background COVID-19 was identified in Wuhan, China, in December 2019, and rapidly spread worldwide, being declared global pandemic on the 11th of March 2020. Since its emergence, COVID-19 has raised global concerns associated with drastic measures that were never adopted in any previous outbreak, to contain the situation as early as possible. Main body The 2019 novel corona virus (2019-nCoV) or SARS-CoV-2 is the causative agent of COVID-19. 2019-nCoV genetic sequence was rapidly identified within few days since the first reported cases and RT-PCR kits became available for COVID-19 diagnosis. However, RT-PCR diagnosis carries a risk of false-negative results; therefore, additional serologic tests are needed. In this review, we summarize the clinical scenario that raises suspicion of COVID-19 and available laboratory diagnostics. Conclusion The most important approach in the battle against COVID-19 is rapid diagnosis of suspicious cases, timely therapeutic intervention and isolation to avoid community spread. Diagnosis depends mainly on PCR testing and serological tests. However, even in the context of negative lab test results and clinical suspicion of COVID-19 infection, clinical decision should be based on clinical suspicion.


1994 ◽  
Vol 130 (6) ◽  
pp. 552-558 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano Mariotti ◽  
Giuseppe Barbesino ◽  
Patrizio Caturegli ◽  
Francesca Atzeni ◽  
Luca Manetti ◽  
...  

Mariotti S, Barbesino G, Caturegli P, Atzeni F, Manetti L, Marinò M, Grasso L, Velluzzi F, Loviselli A, Pinchera A, Martino E. False negative results observed in anti-thyroid peroxidase autoantibody determination by competitive radioimmunoassays using monoclonal antibodies. Eur J Endocrinol 1994;130:552–8. ISSN 0804–4643 Objective: Anti-thyroid peroxidase autoantibody (anti-TPO) and anti-thyroid microsomal antibody (anti-M) are strictly related, but discrepancies are sometimes observed. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence and to identify the causes of these discrepancies. Design and antibody measurements: Anti-M by passive hemagglutination and anti-TPO by two competitive monoclonal antibody-assisted radioimmunoassays (RIA-1 and RIA-2) were measured in 10 103 sera from 4232 subjects (663 male, 3569 female) screened for thyroid disease. Results: Anti-TPO and anti-M correlated quite well (r = 0.7 and p < 0.0001 by RIA-1; r = 0.74 and p < 0.0001 by RIA-2), with discrepancies mostly limited to sera with low antibody titers. After exclusion of the latter samples, anti-TPO were detected in only 79 (1.4%) out of 5317 anti-M negative sera, but were undetectable in a more consistent proportion (130/2880 = 4.5%) of sera from patients with autoimmune thyroid disease and positive anti-M. In 61 sera of the latter group, anti-TPO was measured by a non-competitive RIA (RIA-3). Forty-one (67.7%) were positive by RIA-3, suggesting the presence of anti-TPO not competing with the monoclonal antibodies of RIA-1 and RIA-2. The remaining 20 sera had undetectable anti-TPO also by RIA-3. Nineteen (95%) of these sera had positive anti-thyroglobulin (anti-Tg) autoantibody and preincubation with thyroglobulin inhibited the agglutination reaction of anti-M tests. Conclusion: Anti-TPO by competitive monoclonal antibody-assisted RIA is negative in a minority of sera of patients with autoimmune thyroid disease and positive anti-M. This could be accounted for by anti-Tg producing false positives in the anti-M assay and by a subset of anti-TPO not competing with the monoclonal antibodies in the RIA. When autoimmune thyroid disease is suspected on clinical grounds, a negative anti-TPO test with a competitive RIA should be confirmed always by a non-competitive assay. Stefano Mariotti. Institute of Endocrinology. University of Pisa, Viale del Tirreno 64,1-56018 Tirrenia-Pisa, Italy


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Zhu ◽  
Margaret Creagh ◽  
Chao Qi ◽  
Shannon Galvin ◽  
Maureen Bolon ◽  
...  

Introduction. Reports of false-negative quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR) results from patients with high clinical suspension for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), suggested that a negative result produced by a nucleic acid amplification assays (NAAs) did not always exclude the possibility of COVID-19 infection. Repeat testing has been used by clinicians as a strategy in an to attempt to improve laboratory diagnosis of COVID-19 and overcome false-negative results in particular. Aim. To investigate whether repeat testing is helpful for overcoming false-negative results. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed our experience with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing, focusing on the yield of repeat patient testing for improving SARS-CoV-2 detection by NAA. Results. We found that the yield from using repeat testing to identify false-negative patients was low. When the first test produced a negative result, only 6 % of patients tested positive by the second test. The yield decreased to 1.7 and then 0 % after the third and fourth tests, respectively. When comparing the results produced by three assays, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) SARS CoV-2 RT-qPCR panel, Xpert Xpress CoV-2 and ID NOW COVID-19, the ID NOW assay was associated with the highest number of patients who tested negative initially but positive on repeat testing. The CDC SARS CoV-2 RT-qPCR panel produced the highest number of indeterminate results. Repeat testing resolved more than 90 % of indeterminate/invalid results. Conclusions. The yield from using repeat testing to identify false-negative patients was low. Repeat testing was best used for resolving indeterminate/invalid results.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 1344
Author(s):  
Sumarth Lal Meena ◽  
Kanwar Singh ◽  
Sanjiv Jain ◽  
Anil Jain ◽  
B. S. Karnawat

Background: Thrombocytopenia (platelet count <1,50,000/µL) is one of the most common haematological problems in neonatal intensive care units. In contrast, only 2% of the normal neonates are thrombocytopenic at birth with severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count <50,000/µL) occurring in less than 3/1000 term infants. Multiple disease processes can cause thrombocytopenia in neonates. The important causes of thrombocytopenia in neonates are sepsis, birth asphyxia, prematurity, intra-uterine growth retardation, hyperbilirubinemia, respiratory distress syndrome, meconium aspiration syndrome and low birth weight. Apart from platelet count, bleeding manifestations depend on underlying ailments. The aims and objective were to study the clinical profile, etiology and outcome of neonatal thrombocytopenia in a tertiary care hospital.Methods: Prospective study involving 100 neonates with or developed neonatal thrombocytopenia in NICU.Results: In present study, 100 new-borns with thrombocytopenia 46% were mild, 35% were moderate and 19% were severe thrombocytopenia. 51 (51%) had early onset neonatal thrombocytopenia and 49 (49%) babies had late onset neonatal thrombocytopenia. Anaemia was the dominant maternal predisposing risk factor. Sepsis was the most common cause of neonatal thrombocytopenia. Most common symptom was apnoea. Sepsis, RDS and NEC had significantly contributed to mortality. Most common cause of death was sepsis followed by RDS and NEC.Conclusions: Neonatal thrombocytopenia is a treatable and reversible condition. Hence, it is important to identify neonates at risk and initiate transfusion therapy to prevent severe bleeding and potentially significant morbidity. Anaemia and PROM were the commonest maternal risk factors. Therefore, author recommended that babies born to mothers with these risk factors should be closely monitored for thrombocytopenia.


2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 220
Author(s):  
Cecilia Kato

The reference standard for the confirmation of a recent rickettsial infection is by the observation of a four-fold or greater rise in antibody titres when testing paired acute and convalescent (two to four weeks after illness resolution) sera by serological assays (Figure 1). At the acute stage of illness, diagnosis is performed by molecular detection methods most effectively on DNA extracted from tissue biopsies (eschars, skin rash, and organs) or eschar swabs. Less invasive and more convenient samples such as blood and serum may also be used for detection; however, the low number of circulating bacteria raises the possibility of false negative results. Optimal sampling practices and enhanced sensitivity must therefore be considered in order to provide a more accurate laboratory diagnosis.


2000 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-104
Author(s):  
Samuel Ratnam ◽  
Graham Tipples ◽  
Carol Head ◽  
Micheline Fauvel ◽  
Margaret Fearon ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT As progress is made toward elimination of measles, the laboratory confirmation of measles becomes increasingly important. However, both false-positive and false-negative results can occur with the routinely used indirect measles immunoglobulin M (IgM) serology tests. The measles IgM capture assay is considered to be more specific, and therefore, its use is indicated for confirmatory testing, but its relative performance has not been fully assessed. Four commercial indirect measles IgM serology test kits (the Behring, Clark, Gull, and PanBio assays) and a commercial IgM capture assay (the Light Diagnostics assay) were evaluated for their abilities to detect measles virus-specific IgM antibody with a total of 308 serum samples from patients involved in a measles outbreak and with confirmed cases of measles and 454 samples from subjects without measles. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) IgM capture assay was also used in a part of the evaluation. Among the indirect assays, the overall sensitivities ranged from 82.8% (Clark assay) to 88.6% (Behring assay) and specificity ranged from 86.6% (PanBio assay) to 99.6% (Gull assay). These rates were 92.2 and 86.6%, respectively, for the Light Diagnostics capture assay and 87.0 and 94.8%, respectively, for the CDC capture assay. While the Light Diagnostics capture assay had the best detection rate (80%) with the acute-phase samples compared with those for the rest of the tests (CDC capture assay, 77%; Behring assay, 70%; Gull assay, 69%; PanBio assay, 58%; and Clark assay, 57%), all tests showed a significantly improved sensitivity in the range of 92% (Clark and PanBio assays) to 97% (Light Diagnostics and CDC capture assays) with the convalescent-phase samples, as expected. The best seropositivity rates (in the range of 92 to 100%) were observed with samples collected 6 to 14 days after the onset of symptoms. The Gull assay showed the highest positive predictive value (99.6%), followed by the Behring assay (97.8%) and the CDC capture assay (96.1%). Overall, the Gull and Behring assays were found to be as good as or better than the capture assays. In conclusion, laboratory diagnosis of measles based on IgM serology varies depending on the timing of specimen collection and the test used, and the case for the use of the IgM capture assay as the confirmatory test appears to be uncertain.


1990 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol House ◽  
Peter E. Mikiciuk ◽  
Mary Lou Beminger

Five serological methods of diagnosing African horse sickness were evaluated, using a battery of serum samples from experimental horses vaccinated and challenged with each serotype of African horse sickness virus (AHSV1 through AHSV9): agar gel immunodiffusion (AGID), indirect fluorescent antibody (IFA), complement fixation (CF), virus neutralization (VN), and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The 5 tests were also compared using a panel of field samples, convalescent equine sera with antibodies to domestic equine viral diseases, and sera from horses awaiting export. The ELISA described in this paper was group specific. It did not require calibration with a standard positive serum but did yield elevated values with negative sera that were repeatedly frozen and thawed or heat inactivated. The IFA test was sensitive but could not be used on some field sera as the control cells exhibited fluorescence, possibly due to the animal being recently vaccinated with cell culture material. Sixty-two experimental sera were compared by VN, CF, AGID, and ELISA. Forty sera, 10 positive and 30 negative, were correctly classified by the 5 serologic assays. The 22 remaining sera gave mixed reactions. The AGID had no false positive results but had false negative results for up to 20% of the samples, depending upon the comparison. The VN, CF, and ELISA were similar in their variability. The length of time that virus could be recovered from a viremic blood sample was compared in an evaluation of storage methods for virus isolation samples. Washed erythrocytes were held at 4 C, washed erythrocytes plus stabilizer were held at −70 C, and blood that was drawn into a preservative (oxalate/phenol/glycerol) was held at 4 C. Virus was isolated for 12 months from a sample stored as washed erythrocytes at 4 C but for only 6 months from the same blood stored by the other 2 methods.


Author(s):  
Rania Zayed ◽  
Dalia Omran ◽  
Abeer Zayed

COVID-19 was identified in Wuhan, China in in December 2019, and rapidly spread worldwide, being declared global pandemic one month later on 30 January 2020. Since its emergence, COVID-19 has raised global concerns associated with drastic measures that were never adopted in any previous outbreak, to contain the situation as early as possible. The 2019 novel corona virus (2019-nCoV) or SARS-CoV-2 is the causative agent of COVID-19. 2019-nCoV genetic sequence was rapidly identified within few days since the first reported cases and RT-PCR kits became available for COVID-19 diagnosis. However, RT-PCR diagnosis carries a risk of false-negative results, therefore additional serologic test are needed. The most important approach in the battle against COVID-19 is rapid diagnosis of suspicious cases, timely therapeutic intervention and isolation to avoid community spread. In this review, we summarize the clinical scenario that raises suspicion of COVID-19 and available laboratory diagnostics.


2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 65-68
Author(s):  
Bishow Bandhu Bagale ◽  
Anita Bhandari

ABSTRACTBackground: Thrombocytopenia is a frequently encountered hematological abnormality in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). There are various maternal and neonatal risk factors associated and the incidence varies greatly depending upon the population studies. This study was performed on neonates admitted in Bharatpur Hospital NICU.Materials & Methods: In this retrospective study, 412 neonates who were admitted in NICU from November 2016 to October 2017 were included in the study. Frequency of thrombocytopenia was determined along with associated maternal and neonatal risk factors. Maternal risk factors like Pregnancy induced hypertension (PIH), Diabetes, Eclampsia, drug use and neonatal risk factors like sepsis, asphyxia, intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR), prematurity were analyzed. Requirement of platelet transfusion and the outcome were also evaluated. Results: Of the 412 neonates included, 74 had thrombocytopenia which comprised approximately 18% neonates admitted in NICU. Early onset thrombocytopenia occurring within 72 hrs comprised 91.8% while late onset thrombocytopenia occurring after 72 hrs comprised 8.2% of total thrombocytopenia. 58.1% (43) were mild , 29.7% (22) moderate and 12.2% (9) severe thrombocytopenia. The major neonatal risk factors were sepsis, asphyxia, IUGR and prematurity while gestational diabetes and PIH were maternal risk factors contributing to neonatal thrombocytopenia. Only 4.05% received platelet transfusion. 77.03% of the neonates recovered and were discharged while 12.16% neonates were referred to other centres and 5.40% neonates died.Conclusion: Neonatal thrombocytopenia accounted for 18% of neonates which were admitted in the NICU. Significant neonatal risk factors were asphyxia and sepsis and maternal risk factors were PIH and diabetes. Majority did not require platelet transfusion and outcome was also good.


1999 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Avelino Albas ◽  
Clara Izabel de Lucca Ferrari ◽  
Luzia Helena Queiroz da Silva ◽  
Fernanda Bernardi ◽  
Fumio Honma Ito

Canine brains infected with rabies virus were submitted to decomposition by being left at room temperature of 25 to 29oC for up to 168h. At 24h intervals, brain fragments were analyzed by immunofluorescence (IF) and by the mouse intracerebral inoculation (MI) test to confirm the diagnosis of rabies and to measure the putrefaction effect on the accuracy of the diagnosis. Forty eight h after the beginning of the experiment, the MI test showed signs of impairment with four negative results, while after 72h, 100% of the results were negative to the MI test and only one result was negative to the IF test, indicating that the threshold period for accurate diagnosis is 24 to 48h before putrefaction. The authors recommend the shipment of suspected cases of rabies to the laboratory for confirmation, but the use of putrid materials for diagnosis is meaningless because of false-negative results.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document