Effect of Age and Previous Autologous Transplant on Treatment-Related Mortality and GVHD in 140 Patients Treated with Reduce-Intensity Conditioning and Allograft for Advanced Hematological Malignancies.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 5138-5138
Author(s):  
Paolo Corradini ◽  
Francesco Zallio ◽  
Jacopo Mariotti ◽  
Pinuccia Valagussa ◽  
Anna Dodero ◽  
...  

Abstract Previous autografting and older age are traditionally considered poor prognostic factors for patients receiving myeloablative conditioning followed by allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). Reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) achieved a significant reduction of treatment related mortality, but the influence of previously described risk factors on the outcome of this new strategy has not been fully described. We have evaluated if age older than 55 years and a failed autologous transplantation could have an impact on transplant-related mortality (TRM) and graft versus host disease (GVHD) occurrence. One hundred and forty allogeneic SCTs from HLA-identical sibling donors were analyzed: all patients received the same conditioning (Thiotepa 10mg/Kg, Fludarabine 60 mg/ms and Cyclophosphamide 60 mg/kg and) and GVHD prophylaxis (cyclosporin 2mg/kg and short course methotrexate). Patients were divided in two cohorts according to age: 86 patients were younger and 54 older than 55 years (range 20–69). Main pre-transplant characteristics were fairly well distributed in both cohorts, in terms of: sex, mismatch donor/recipient, CMV status, previous autografting, disease status at transplant, type of disease (lymphoid vs myeloid), stem cell source and number of previous lines of chemotherapy (<2 vs ≥2). Four-year treatment related mortality (TRM) was 13% for younger group and 17% for the older one (p=0.3), while overall survival (OS) was 58% and 59%, respectively (p=0.9). By univariate and multivariate analysis no pretransplant risk factor examined was found as significantly negative predictor of TRM; in particular no significantly association was found between a previously failed autograft and TRM in the younger (p=0.8) and in the older cohort (p=0.1). Instead, looking at GVHD, we observed that the occurrence of grade III–IV aGVHD was associated with a significantly worse TRM in both young (p=0.008) and elderly patients (p=0.005); similarly, extensive cGVHD was a predictor for worse TRM if compared to limited cGVHD in younger (p=0.8) and older patients (p=0.03). Finally, a strong association between favourable outcome and the onset of limited cGVHD was observed not only if compared to patients with extensive cGVHD but even compared to patients who never showed any sign of cGVHD; in fact 4-year OS curve for younger patients with limited cGVHD was 80% vs 50% of patients with no cGVHD (p=0.03); the same applies for the older cohort (4-years OS of 100% vs 48%, respectively). Our results indicate that: RIC can be safely applied to patients over 50 years; the deleterious effect of a previous failed autoBMT has been minimized by the RIC program. Moreover, severe GVHD still has a maior impact on the outcome; otherwise limited cGVHD seems an effective immunotherapy in high risk patients.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 3045-3045
Author(s):  
John D. Dickinson ◽  
Fausto Loberiza ◽  
Victoria Whalen ◽  
Philip J. Bierman ◽  
Julie M. Vose ◽  
...  

Abstract Considerable advancements have been made in our understanding of the biology and treatment of CLL/SLL. Despite these advances, CLL/SLL essentially remains an incurable illness. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has been used in an attempt to improve remission duration and survival. However little high level data exists on outcomes for patients (pts) undergoing HSCT for CLL/SLL. We evaluated the long-term survival of 65 CLL/SLL pts who underwent allogeneic or autologous HSCT from 1995 until 2006 at the University of Nebraska Medical Center. The median duration of follow-up for surviving pts is 8.8 years. The median age was 49 years and there was no significant difference in age between the autologous and allogeneic groups. Thirty nine pts underwent allogeneic HSCT (n=25 matched related donor, n=14 matched unrelated donor) and 26 pts underwent autologous HSCT. For the group undergoing allogeneic HSCT, the stem cell source was mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells in 74% and bone marrow in 26%. In the autologous HSCT group, 81% of pts received peripheral blood and 19% received bone marrow as their stem cell source. In the autologous group there were 19 deaths (10 from progression) over the period of follow-up. In the allogeneic group there were 29 deaths (including 8 from acute regimen related toxicity, 9 from infection, 3 from complications of GVHD, 1 from late pulmonary toxicity, one from PTLD, one from MDS/AML) and 10 pts are alive at end of follow-up. One hundred day mortality was significantly higher in the allogeneic group (20% vs. 6%; p=0.05). For the allogeneic group the cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute graft versus host disease (GHVD) was 64% (95% confidence interval [CI]=47–76) and the cumulative incidence of chronic extensive GHVD was 50% (95% CI=29–68). One-year progression free survival (PFS) was significantly better among autologous SCT when compared to allogeneic HSCT (77% versus 45%; P=0.006), but at 5 years these differences were no longer apparent. Similarly, one-year overall survival (OS) was significantly better for autologous SCT (81% versus 48%; P=0.003) but at 5 years these differences were no longer significant (49% versus 31%; p=0.15). Among all patients undergoing allogeneic HSCT, 5-year PFS was significantly higher for patients with SLL vs. CLL (36% vs. 25%; P=0.04). In addition, 5 year OS was better for pts with SLL compared to CLL (51% vs. 33%, P=0.06). There was no difference in PFS or OS following autologous SCT between patients with a diagnosis of CLL versus SLL. The group of pts undergoing autologous HSCT demonstrates no plateau on the PFS curve, whereas for pts undergoing allogeneic HSCT there is a suggestion of a plateau in PFS at approximately 25%. In conclusion, CLL/SLL patients undergoing allogeneic SCT had a higher incidence of early treatment related mortality, mainly from regimen related toxicity and infection. In a subgroup analysis pts with CLL appear to have an inferior PFS compared with pts with SLL. This difference may be due to a more prominent underlying immune deficiency in CLL patients that leads to a higher probability of treatment related mortality. Pts with CLL/SLL undergoing autologous HSCT had a lower incidence of treatment related mortality, but there is no evidence of a plateau in progression-free survival.


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (14) ◽  
pp. 1855-1863 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronjon Chakraverty ◽  
Stephen Mackinnon

Historically, high levels of treatment-related mortality restricted the use of standard myeloablative allogeneic stem-cell transplantation to a minority of young and fit patients with lymphoma. Over the last decade, increasing numbers of patients with lymphoma have undergone allogeneic stem-cell transplantation using reduced-intensity protocols that are associated with lower toxicity and reduced transplantation-related mortality. Graft-versus-lymphoma effects contribute to the therapeutic effect in patients with indolent or Hodgkin's lymphoma. However, definitive evidence for efficacy of this strategy is lacking because most patients undergoing transplantation do so after failure of several lines of treatment, leaving no obvious comparator arm for randomized controlled studies. Nevertheless, encouraging results have been reported for selected patients for most lymphoma subtypes, with pretransplantation disease status emerging as the most important predictor of outcome. The major long-term toxicity is chronic graft-versus-host disease that contributes to ill health in a significant minority of survivors. In the future, risk-adapted trials that evaluate reduced-intensity allogeneic transplantation in patients with predicted poor outcomes with immunochemotherapy or autologous transplantation will be important in determining the role of this treatment.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4470-4470
Author(s):  
Qianlan Zhou ◽  
XiaoWen Tang ◽  
Huiying Qiu ◽  
Aining Sun ◽  
Changgeng Ruan ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4470 Objective: To evaluate the impact of disease status on outcomes of allogeneic hematopietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) for refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Methods: 32 patients with refractory AML received allo-HSCT after myeloablative conditioning regimen, including 17 patients not in remission (NR) and 15 patients in complete remission (CR) at the time of transplant. Treatment related adverse events, relapse rate and leukemia free survival (LFS) were compared in two groups. Results: There were no difference between two groups regarding patients gender, age, cytogenetic risk, donor type, stem cell resource, conditioning regimen, median number of CD34+ cells. 30 patients engrafted successfully. Only one patient failed to engraftment and another one died from veno-occlusive disease. Compared with CR group, NR group had a higher treatment related mortality (29.4% vs.13.3%,p=0.254), relapse rates (33.3% vs. 20.0% P=0.341),relative higher incidence of aGVHD (35.3% vs. 20.0%, p=0.287) and cGVHD (44.4% vs. 36.4%, p=0.217), but no significant difference was observed. 2-year LFS of the two groups were comparable (35.3% vs.40.0%,p=0.267). For the patient with refractory AML, univariate analysis showed that two factors, such as less than 35 years old and cGVHD, were benefit for overall survival. Conclusion: Regarding treatment related mortality, relapse rates, incidence of GVHD, there were no significant difference between the patients who achieved CR or NR prior to transplant. 2-year LFS of patients with CR and NR was comparable. In summary, our results showed that allo-HSCT is an appropriate treatment option for refractory AML patients. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1167-1167
Author(s):  
Andreas S. Buser ◽  
Laura Infanti ◽  
Andreas Holbro ◽  
Joerg Halter ◽  
Sabine Gerull ◽  
...  

Background: Platelet component (PC) transfusion is required for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) recipients. Contamination with infectious pathogens (bacteria, viruses, or protozoa) and T-cells is a risk factor for transfusion-transmitted infection (TTI) and transfusion associated graft-versus-host disease (TA-GVHD). Pathogen inactivation (PI) treatment of PC with amotosalen-UVA (PI-PC, INTERCEPT Blood System, Cerus Corp) in platelet additive solution (PAS) without bacterial screening, gamma irradiation, CMV serology, and with 7-day storage has been the standard of care in Switzerland since 2011 to manage risk of TTI and TA-GVHD. PI-PC have replaced conventional PC (C-PC) prepared in PAS with gamma irradiation and 5 day storage. We previously reported platelet usage in two consecutive five year periods at the University Hospital of Basel. Mean PI-PC dose was higher (3.0 vs. 2.8 x 1011, p=0.001) and mean storage duration longer (4.2 vs. 3.4 days: p=0.001) than with C-PC. PC expiration wastage was reduced with 7-day PI-PC storage vs. 5-day storage (1.5% vs. 8.7%). For HCT recipients, days of PC support; PC use per patient; and RBC use per patient were similar, despite 24.3% lower corrected count increments (CCI) with PI-PC. Now, we report the impact of these observations on treatment related mortality (TRM) and overall survival (OS) 100 days after HCT. Patients and Methods: A two-period retrospective cohort study was conducted to evaluate PI-PC impact on outcomes of consecutive first allogeneic HCT recipients from January 2006 to December 2010 (Period 1, P1), when gamma-irradiated apheresis C-PC were used, and Period 2 (P2) from January 2011 to December 2017, when apheresis and whole blood-derived PI-PC were used. The review utilized 100-day OS and 100-day TRM to determine the impact of PI-PC on HCT outcomes. Descriptive statistics were used for continuous variables and log-rank analysis for survival outcomes. Univariate analysis was performed using Pearson χ2 statistics. Multivariate Cox regression modelling analyses included: PC period (P1, P2), donor match (HLA identical/twin, matched related, matched unrelated), disease state (early, intermediate, late), and conditioning regimen (reduced intensity, myeloablative) with TRM as the outcome. This was an IRB approved single-center analysis. Results: In P1 and P2, 256 and 557 consecutive first-time allogeneic HCT recipients were included, respectively. By univariate analysis, the distribution of European Group for Bone Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) risk scores (grouped 0-2, 3-4, 5-7) and mean patient age were higher during P2 (p = 0.001 and p <0.001, respectively). Primary disease status (p = 0.039); stem cell source (p <0.001); GVHD prophylaxis with ATG (p <0.001); total body irradiation (p <0.001); and conditioning regimen (p <0.001) were different between P1 and P2. Donor match (p=0.084) and disease status (p = 0.628) were similar in P1 and P2. TRM at day 100 post HCT was significantly less (31/557, 5.5%) for PI-PC recipients in P2 vs. C-PC recipients in P1 (37/256, 14.5%, p<0.001). Overall proportion of survivors at day 100 post HCT was significantly greater for PI-PC recipients (507/557, 91.0 %) compared to C-PC recipients (209/256, 81.6%, p <0.001). By multivariate Cox regression analysis, P2 with PI-PC component support was associated with improved TRM (p = 0.001; adjusted hazard ratio 0.433; 95% confidence interval: 0.262, 0.716). Donor match (p = 0.019), disease state (p = 0.022), and myeloablative conditioning (p = 0.034) were associated with significantly poorer TRM (Table). Stem cell source was not significant (p=0.157) in the model. Hemorrhage was reported as cause of death in 1/50 (2.0%) patients during P2 with PI-PC and 4/47 (8.5%) patients during P1 with C-PCs. Conclusions: Universal implementation of PI-PC in routine with extended storage to 7 days in P2 was associated with reduced TRM and better overall survival 100 days post HCT, despite transplantation of older patients with higher EBMT risk scores. Multivariate analysis revealed an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.433 (95% C.I. 0.262, 0.716) for TRM by 100 days, suggesting better outcomes in P2. This retrospective analysis at a single site indicated that PI-PC treated with amotosalen /UVA stored up to 7 days did not have a negative impact on TRM and OS in HCT recipients, and was an integral part of improving clinical outcomes at our institution. . Table. Disclosures Heim: Novartis: Research Funding. Irsch:Cerus Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lin:Cerus Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Benjamin:Cerus Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Corash:Cerus Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership.


Blood ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 95 (7) ◽  
pp. 2240-2245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annoek E. C. Broers ◽  
Ron van der Holt ◽  
Joost W. J. van Esser ◽  
Jan-Willem Gratama ◽  
Sonja Henzen-Logmans ◽  
...  

We evaluated the efficacy, toxicity, and outcome of preemptive ganciclovir (GCV) therapy in 80 cytomegalovirus (CMV)-seropositive patients allografted between 1991 and 1996 and compared their outcome to 35 seronegative patients allografted during the same period. Both cohorts were comparable with respect to diagnosis and distribution of high- versus standard-risk patients. All patients received a stem cell graft from an HLA-identical sibling donor, and grafts were partially depleted of T cells in 109 patients. Patients were monitored for CMV antigenemia by leukocyte expression of the CMV-pp65 antigen. Fifty-two periods of CMV reactivation occurring in 30 patients were treated preemptively with GCV. A favorable response was observed in 48 of 50 periods, and only 2 patients developed CMV disease: 1 with esophagitis and 1 with pneumonia. Ten of 30 treated patients developed GCV-related neutropenia (less than 0.5 × 109/L), which was associated with a high bilirubin at the start of GCV therapy. Overall survival at 5 years was 64% in the CMV-seronegative cohort and 40% in the CMV-seropositive cohort (P = .01). Increased treatment-related mortality accounted for inferior survival. CMV seropositivity proved an independent risk factor for developing acute graft-versus-host disease, and acute graft-versus-host disease predicted for higher treatment-related mortality and worse overall survival in a time-dependent analysis. We conclude that, although CMV disease can effectively be prevented by preemptive GCV therapy, CMV seropositivity remains a strong adverse risk factor for survival following partial T-cell–depleted allogeneic stem cell transplantation.


Blood ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 95 (7) ◽  
pp. 2240-2245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annoek E. C. Broers ◽  
Ron van der Holt ◽  
Joost W. J. van Esser ◽  
Jan-Willem Gratama ◽  
Sonja Henzen-Logmans ◽  
...  

Abstract We evaluated the efficacy, toxicity, and outcome of preemptive ganciclovir (GCV) therapy in 80 cytomegalovirus (CMV)-seropositive patients allografted between 1991 and 1996 and compared their outcome to 35 seronegative patients allografted during the same period. Both cohorts were comparable with respect to diagnosis and distribution of high- versus standard-risk patients. All patients received a stem cell graft from an HLA-identical sibling donor, and grafts were partially depleted of T cells in 109 patients. Patients were monitored for CMV antigenemia by leukocyte expression of the CMV-pp65 antigen. Fifty-two periods of CMV reactivation occurring in 30 patients were treated preemptively with GCV. A favorable response was observed in 48 of 50 periods, and only 2 patients developed CMV disease: 1 with esophagitis and 1 with pneumonia. Ten of 30 treated patients developed GCV-related neutropenia (less than 0.5 × 109/L), which was associated with a high bilirubin at the start of GCV therapy. Overall survival at 5 years was 64% in the CMV-seronegative cohort and 40% in the CMV-seropositive cohort (P = .01). Increased treatment-related mortality accounted for inferior survival. CMV seropositivity proved an independent risk factor for developing acute graft-versus-host disease, and acute graft-versus-host disease predicted for higher treatment-related mortality and worse overall survival in a time-dependent analysis. We conclude that, although CMV disease can effectively be prevented by preemptive GCV therapy, CMV seropositivity remains a strong adverse risk factor for survival following partial T-cell–depleted allogeneic stem cell transplantation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document