Beneficial Effects of Cytogenetic and Molecular Response on Long-Term Outcome in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) Treated with Imatinib (IM): Update from the IRIS Study.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 166-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bengt Simonsson ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Blast Crisis ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract Background: IM was proven to be superior to IFN+Ara-C for newly diagnosed pts with CML-CP (O’Brien et al, NEJM 2003). At 42-months of follow-up, 75% of the 553 pts randomized to IM remain on treatment. Of the 553 pts randomized to IFN+Ara-C only 4% are still on IFN+Ara-C. This update analysis is focused on IM pts. Methods: Evaluation included complete hematologic response (CHR), major/complete cytogenetic response (MCyR/CCyR) - defined as 0-35% Ph+ and 0% Ph+ metaphases respectively, major molecular response (MMR) - defined as ≥3 log reduction of bcr-abl transcripts from the standardized baseline, time to progression - defined as loss of CHR/MCyR or evolution to accelerated phase/blast crisis (AP/BC) or death due to any cause, time to AP/BC - defined as evolution to AP/BC or death due to CML, and overall survival. Results: With an average duration of 38 months of IM treatment, the best observed rates of CHR, MCyR and CCyR are 96%, 88% and 81%, respectively. Although the majority of MCyRs were achieved within the first 3 to 9 months, some pts achieved a MCyR and some even a CCyR after more than one year of treatment (Figure 1). The estimated MMR rate at 12 months is 40%. Figure 1 - Observed CHR, MCyR and CCyR during treatment with IM Figure 1 -. Observed CHR, MCyR and CCyR during treatment with IM The estimated progression-free rate at 42 months is 84%; additionally 94% are estimated free of progression to AP/BC (97% of the pts with CCyR and 73% of the pts without CCyR during study, p<0.001). The risk of relapse remains low with no apparent increased risk over time. The yearly hazard for progression to AP/BC is about 2% in each of the 4 years. The overall estimated survival at 42 months is 91% (considering all deaths). The estimated survival was lowest in pts with high risk Sokal score (84%) as compared to 91% in the intermediate risk pts and 94% in the low risk pts (p<0.001). Similarly, the best observed CCyR in the high, intermediate, and low risk groups were 69%, 80% and 88% respectively (p=0.002). In the subset of pts with CCyR the estimated survival at 42 months was 92%, 93% and 97% in the high to low risk groups (p=0.30), indicating that once pts achieve a CCyR, their survival is not significantly different between the Sokal risk groups. Of the 509 pts who were still on treatment at 12 months and had achieved a MCyR by then (n=436), the rate without progression to AP/BC at 42 months was 97% whereas it was only 83% for the 73 pts who did not achieve a MCyR at 12 months (p<0.001). The estimated survival rates at 42 months were 95% and 83% in these two response groups, respectively (p<0.001). Furthermore, for pts who had achieved a MMR at 12 months, the probability of remaining free from progression to AP/BC was 100% at 42 months compared to 95% for pts in CCyR but not in MMR, and 91% for pts not in CCyR at 12 months (p=0.0013). Conclusions: The follow-up confirms the beneficial effect of cytogenetic and molecular responses on long-term outcomes with IM. These results will be further updated using data cut-off of 31-July 2005 to reflect additional 12-months of data (i.e., 54-month follow-up).

scholarly journals Long-Term Outcome of Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Treated with Nilotinib Front-Line

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 44-45
Author(s):  
Franck E Nicolini ◽  
Vincent Alcazer ◽  
Pascale Cony-Makhoul ◽  
Stephanie Dulucq ◽  
Sandrine Hayette ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Front Line ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Long Term Outcome

Nilotinib (NIL) 600 mg daily has demonstrated its superiority over Imatinib 400 mg daily in terms of response and incidence of deep molecular response in the front-line chronic phase (CP) CML setting. In this observational study we have retrospectively analyzed the outcome of in- and out-study 202 patients (pts) treated in this setting with NIL 600 mg front-line, in "real-life" conditions. All pts with newly diagnosed adult CP-CML receiving NIL 300 mg BID alone front-line between 10/2007 and 06/2020, were eligible for this study. Data were retrospectively collected according to the current French regulations with pts' information. All pts were assessed and followed according to ELN recommendations 2003, 2006, and 2009 along treatment and to the recommendations from the French group of CML (D. Rea et al., Cancer 2018) in case of TFR. In this regard, a TKI was resumed if loss of MMR. All BCR-ABL1 assessments were performed in the 3 reference laboratories, standardised and expressed in % (IS) with ≥32,000 copies of ABL1 as control. The primary endpoints were the rate of molecular responses in the long-term and the (vascular) safety of Nilotinib. Secondary endpoints were the kinetics of molecular response, survival and safety of Nilotinib. Survival (OS, PFS & EFS) was defined according to ELN (J. Guilhot et al. Blood 2012). Two hundred and two patients were reported with 44% females and 56% males with a median age at diagnosis of 50.4 (17.5-83) years, and 26% of them had cardiovascular risk factors at onset (tobacco abuse 11%, hypercholesterolemia 9.3%, diabetes 1.45%, none with past history of cardiovascular events [CVE]). ELTS scores were high in 14%, intermediate in 31% and low in 55% of pts. Twenty-four (12%) pts harboured additional chromosomal abnormalities at diagnosis. The median follow-up after NIL initiation was 61.5 (1-147.5) months. At last follow-up 113 pts (55%) are not on NIL anymore for toxicities, TFR or resistance reasons. Twenty-eight (14%) pts present an arterial event on NIL (18% PAOD, 14% angina pectoralis, 7% myocardial infarction, 14% stroke, 47% others such as atrial fibrillation, cardiomyopathy...), that occurred after a median of 26 (0.6-98.5) months on NIL. Forty-six (22.5%) pts reached TFR criteria and stopped NIL after a median of 58.5 (27-126) months. The cumulative incidence (CI) rates of MMR at 1, 2 and 5 years were 64 (57-71)%, 79.4 (75.45-83.35)% and 95 (92-98.5)% respectively. For MR4, those were 35.5 (29-42)%, 60 (52-67)% and 82 (74.5-89)% respectively; and for MR4.5, were 14 (9-19)%, 31 (24-28)% and 62 (54-70.5)% respectively. The CI of sustained MR4.5 (i. e. patients eligible for TFR: MR4.5 ≥2 years) was observed in 30 (23-37)% at 3 years, 45.5 (36-55)% at 5 years and 52.5 (41.5-64)% at 6 years (Figure). The CI of patients entering TFR was 16.75 (10.5-23)% at 5 years and 51.94 (37.31-66.57)% at 10 years with a survival without MMR loss of 70.7 (58- 86)% at 1 year and 65.26 (50.6-84)% at 5 years. Nine (4.5%) pts progressed towards accelerated phase (4 pts) or BC (2 lymphoid, 3 myeloid) responsible for 5 deaths at latest follow-up. Among NIL resistant patients screened, 15 were harbouring ABL1 mutations (5 Y253H, 3 E255K, 3 T315I, 1 M244V, 1 G250E, 1 F359V, 1 V299L). Overall, 10 patients died (5 from CML, 5 from unrelated causes). The probability of OS was 95.75 [95%CI: 92.9-98.7]% at 2 years and 94.8 [91.5-98.3]% at 5 years, for PFS it was 94.92 [91.7-98.2]% at 2 years and 89.5 [84.7-94.6]% at 5 years, and EFS it was 78 [72.3-84]% at 2 years and 60.25 [53.3-68.1]% at 5 years. Regarding sustained MR4.5, univariate analysis showed that female gender (HR=2.46 [1.50-4.02], p&lt;0.001) and low ELTS (HR=0.41 [0.22-0.76], p&lt;0.004) had a significant impact, while multivariate analysis confirmed the role of these 2 factors (HR=2.31 [1.41- 3.79], p=0.001 and HR= 0.52 [0.30- 0.90], p=0.02) in addition to high ELTS (HR= 0.28 [0.14- 0.58], p&lt;0.001). Univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that only age impacted on the CI of CVE (HR= 1.07 [1.04-1.10], p&lt;0.001, and HR=1.07 [1.04-1.10], p&lt;0.001). NIL first-line efficiently limits progression of newly diagnosed CP-CML patients and provides high rates of sustained MR4.5, allowing TFR in a substantial proportion of pts. However, the onset of arterial occlusive events, especially in the elderly is a matter of concern in the choice of this compound at treatment initiation. Disclosures Nicolini: Incyte: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sun Pharma Ltd: Consultancy. Cony-Makhoul:BMS: Speakers Bureau; Incyte Biosciences: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy. Dulucq:Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Cayuela:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Speakers Bureau. Rea:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mahon:ARIAD: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria. Etienne:Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Sustained Durability of Responses Plus High Rates of Cytogenetic Responses Result in Long-Term Benefit for Newly Diagnosed Chronic-Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML-CP) Treated with Imatinib (IM) Therapy: Update from the IRIS Study.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 21-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francois Guilhot
Keyword(s):  
Blast Crisis ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Transcript Level ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Major Molecular Response ◽  
First Line

IM has proven to be superior to IFN+Ara-C for newly diagnosed pts with CML-CP (O’Brien et al, NEJM, 2003). At 30-months of follow-up, 79% of pts randomized to IM remain on IM with 83% of them now treated for > 24 months. Therefore, this analysis is focused on first-line IM pts (n=553). Evaluation included complete hematologic response (CHR), major/complete cytogenetic response (MCyR/CCyR), major molecular response (≥3 log reduction in BCR-ABL/BCR vs. pooled diagnostic samples) time to progression (TTP) - defined as loss of CHR/MCyR or evolution to accelerated phase/blast crisis [AP/BC] or death, time to AP/BC, and overall survival. Median follow-up for first-line IM pts is 31.1. Summary of results are the following: 1st-line imatinib * 95% CI Best observed CHR/MCyR/CCyR (%) 95/87/79 Estimated major molecular response at 12 mos. (%) 40 Estimated cumulative MCyR % at 30 mos. 90 Estimated cumulative CCyR % at 30 mos. 82 Estimated % free of progression at 30 mos. 88 (85–91)* Estimated % free of AP/BC at 30 mos. 95 (93–97)* Estimated % survival at 30 mos. 95 (93–97)* The additional follow-up confirmed durable responses with first-line therapy while also demonstrating the effect of cytogenetic response on long-term outcomes. The estimated rate of confirmed responders remaining in response after achieving a CCyR at 30 months is >92%. Similarly, the estimated rate of patients still in response at 30 months after achieving either a MCyR or CHR is also >92% for both groups. Only 2% of pts with a confirmed loss of MCyR and 1% of the pts with a confirmed loss of CCyR subsequently progressed to AP/BC. Of these pts, 3 of 5 benefited from a dose increase to 600 or 800 mg of IM, while only 1 of 7 pts with a confirmed loss subsequently achieved a MCyR without a dose escalation. A total of 75 pts received a marrow transplant (BMT) after discontinuation from the study; 30 in the IM arm (2 after crossover from IFN) and 45 pts who were randomized to IFN (21 after crossover to IM). There was no difference in survival after BMT between pts who received first-line IM treatment (8 deaths, 1 after crossover) and pts who had received IFN+Ara–C (7 deaths) or IFN+Ara–C followed by IM (7 deaths) (p=0.78). The estimated survival at 12 months after BMT is 70%, 75%, and 68% respectively in the three groups. A landmark analysis showed that for 407 pts who achieved MCyR within 6 months, their estimated rate free of AP/BC at 30 months is 97% vs. 89% for the 124 pts who did not achieve this level of response at 6 months (p<0.001). Additionally, the estimated survival at 30 months for the same pts is 97% vs. 92% (p=0.0162). The achievement of a major molecular response at 12 months was also associated with improved progression-free survival. For patients who had achieved CCyR and a reduction in BCR-ABL transcript level ≥ 3 log at 12 months, the probability of remaining progression free was 100% at 30 months compared to 93% for such patients with reduction in BCR-ABL transcript level < 3 log and 82% for patients who were not in CCyR at 12 months (p<0.0001). These results will be further updated using a data cut-off of 31-July-04 to reflect additional 12-months of data (i.e., 42-month follow-up).

Long Term Follow up of Patients with CML in Chronic Phase Treated with First-Line Imatinib Suggests That Earlier Achievement of a Major Molecular Response Leads to Greater Stability of Response.

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 2113-2113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Branford ◽  
Rebecca Lawrence ◽  
Andrew Grigg ◽  
John Francis Seymour ◽  
Anthony Schwarer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Initial Slope ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Average Dose ◽  
Major Molecular Response ◽  
First Line ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract A major molecular response (MMR) by 12 or 18 months (m) of standard dose imatinib for patients (pts) with newly diagnosed chronic phase CML is associated with a low risk of progression to accelerated phase or blast crisis. Phase II/III trials suggest that MMR may be achieved earlier with higher doses of imatinib. We determined whether the timing of MMR affects the long term stability of response with regard to the acquisition of BCR-ABL mutations and/or loss of MMR (collectively defined as an “event”) for pts with up to 8 years of follow up since commencing first-line imatinib. All pts treated with 400 to 600mg of first-line imatinib who were monitored regularly at our institution for BCR-ABL levels by real-time quantitative PCR and mutation analysis by direct sequencing were evaluated: 181 pts were followed for a median of 45m (range (r) 3–96m). The event rate was compared for pts dependent on the time to MMR (≤0.1% IS (international scale)) in 6m intervals to 18m of imatinib. The events for pts with undetectable BCR-ABL (complete molecular response, CMR) were also determined. Strict sensitivity criteria were used for CMR: undetectable BCR-ABL where the sensitivity of analysis indicated BCR-ABL was &lt;0.003% IS, (equivalent to at least 4.5 log below the standardized baseline) which was confirmed on a subsequent analysis. Loss of MMR was defined as a confirmed &gt;2 fold rise from nadir to a level &gt;0.1% IS in pts who maintained imatinib dose. 144/181 pts (80%) achieved MMR at a median of 12m (r 3–53m). Consistent with other studies, maintaining a higher dose of imatinib in the first 6m of therapy was associated with a significantly higher frequency of pts achieving MMR by 6m. 118 pts received an average dose of &lt;600mg in the first 6m and 18/118 (15%) achieved MMR by 6m, whereas 63 pts received an average dose of 600mg in the first 6m and 23/63 (37%) achieved MMR by 6m, P=0.002. Mutations were detected in 14/181 pts (8%) at a median of 9m (r 3–42m). An event occurred in 8 pts with MMR at a median of 36m (r12–57m) after commencing imatinib, including one patient who had achieved CMR. Mutations were found in 4 pts and 3/4 lost MMR. The remaining 4 lost MMR without a mutation. The one patient with a mutation who did not lose MMR had a 3-fold rise in BCR-ABL at the time of mutation detection and responded to a higher imatinib dose. The other pts with mutations had therapeutic intervention upon cytogenetic relapse (2) or loss of MMR (1). The 4 pts with loss of MMR and no mutation had accelerated phase (1), cytogenetic relapse (2) and one maintained CCR with 3m of follow up. The median fold rise in BCR-ABL upon loss of MMR was 26 (r 4–220). The probability of an event if MMR was achieved by a) 6m was 0% (n=41 evaluable pts), b) &gt;6 to 12m was 12% (n=40) and c) 12 to 18m was 19% (n=33). The median follow up since MMR was achieved was not significantly different for the groups: 49m (r 3–87m), 38m (r 6–87m), 40m (r 9–78m), respectively, P=0.5. The risk of an event for pts with MMR achieved by 6m was significantly lower than in pts with MMR achieved by &gt;6 to 18m, P=0.04. CMR occurred in 55 pts who were followed for a median of 24m (r 3–55m) after its attainment. Only 1 event occurred in these 55 pts, which was at 6m after CMR was achieved and 57m after commencing imatinib. This patient had maintained MMR for 45m but loss of a major cytogenetic response occurred 6m after loss of MMR. There was a significant difference in the probability of CMR by 60m of imatinib dependent on the time to MMR, P&lt;0.0001 (Figure). All pts failed to achieve CMR by 60m if not in MMR at 18m whereas the actuarial rate of CMR at 60m was 93% in those with MMR by 6m. The initial slope of BCR-ABL decline correlated strongly with the decline over the longer term. The mean time to CMR after attainment of MMR was significantly faster for pts with MMR by 6m compared to those with MMR at &gt;6 to 12m and &gt;12 to 18m: 24m vs 37m vs 42m, respectively, P=0.001. This suggests the rate of BCR-ABL reduction below the level of MMR was faster in pts with MMR by 6m, which may be clinically beneficial as none of these pts had a subsequent event. Based on these findings we propose that inducing earlier molecular responses with higher dose imatinib or more potent kinase inhibitors may lead to more durable and deeper responses. It remains possible however, that early molecular response reflects a more biologically favourable disease rather than being the direct cause of more durable response. Finally, CMR was associated with an extremely low risk of events, making it an appropriate next target of therapy after MMR is achieved. Figure Figure

Long-term benefits of imatinib (IM) for patients newly diagnosed with chronic myelogenous leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP): The 5-year update from the IRIS study

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6506-6506 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. J. Druker ◽  
F. Guilhot ◽  
S. O’Brien ◽  
R. A. Larson
Keyword(s):  
Blast Crisis ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Marrow Transplant ◽  
Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Rate Of Progression ◽  
Presentation Methods

6506 Background: IM was proven to be superior to IFN+Ara-C for newly diagnosed patients (pts) with CML-CP (O’ Brien et al, NEJM 2003). 1,106 pts were randomized between June 2000 and Jan 2001 to either IM 400 mg or IFN+Ara-C with 553 pts to each treatment. This abstract is based on data collected up to 54 months after last patient had been recruited on IM. 60-months (5-year) data will be available for presentation. Methods: Evaluations included complete hematologic response (CHR), complete/partial cytogenetic response (CCyR/PCyR - defined as 0% / 1–35% Ph+ metaphases respectively), major cytogenetic response (MCyR=CCyR+ PCyR), major molecular response (MMR) - defined as ≥ 3 log reduction of BCR-ABL transcript levels from the standardized baseline, time to progression - defined as loss of CHR/MCyR, evolution to accelerated phase/blast crisis (AP/BC), or death due to any cause during treatment, and overall survival. Results: With a median follow-up of 54-months, 72% of the 553 randomized pts remain on initial IM treatment (5% of pts discontinued due to adverse events, 9.5% due to unsatisfactory therapeutic effect and 11% due to other reasons another 2.5% crossed over to IFN+Ara-C). Overall, the cumulative best response rates of CHR, MCyR and CCyR are 97%, 88% and 82%, respectively. The overall estimated survival was 90% (93% when censored at bone marrow transplant). An estimated 84% of pts have not progressed on treatment and 93% of pts were free from progression to AP/BC. The annual rate of progression to AP/BC of < 1% in the fourth year was lower than each of the first three years (1.5, 2.8, and 1.6%, respectively). Of the pts with MCyR at 12 months (n=436), an estimated 96% were free of progression to AP/BC at 54 months whereas it was only 81% for the 73 pts who did not achieve a MCyR at 12 months (p< 0.001). No patient with a MMR within 12 months progressed to AP/BC within 54 months. Conclusions: This analysis confirms the high rates and durability of responses to IM. Encouragingly, the rate of progression in the fourth year was lower than in each of the preceding three years. Results further demonstrate the beneficial effect of cytogenetic and molecular responses on long-term outcomes. [Table: see text]

Dasatinib versus imatinib (IM) in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP): DASISION 3-year follow-up.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6504-6504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Hochhaus ◽  
Neil P. Shah ◽  
Jorge E. Cortes ◽  
Michele Baccarani ◽  
M. Brigid Bradley-Garelik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Transformation Rate ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Intent To Treat

6504 Background: In the phase 3 DASISION trial of dasatinib v IM in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed CML-CP, dasatinib had higher 12-month rates of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and major molecular response (MMR) (Kantarjian, NEJM 2010;362:2260). By 12 months confirmed CCyR (cCCyR) rates for dasatinib v IM were 77% v 66%, P=0.001, meeting the primary endpoint. Methods: Pts were randomized to receive dasatinib 100 mg once daily (QD; n=259) or IM 400 mg QD (n=260). Results: Minimum 24-month follow-up (median 26.6 months) is reported here. 24-month molecular response rates were higher for dasatinib v IM: MMR (BCR-ABL ≤0.1%) 64% v 46%, P<0.0001; MR4 (BCR-ABL ≤0.01%) 29% v 19%, P=0.0053; MR4.5 (BCR-ABL ≤0.0032%) 17% v 8%, P=0.0032. MMR rates were higher for dasatinib in all Hasford risk groups (high 73% v 56%; intermediate 61% v 50%; low 73% v 56%). Of pts who achieved MMR at 12 months, on dasatinib v IM, 97% v 92% had maintained their MMR at 24 months, respectively. Pts receiving dasatinib v IM had faster responses; median time to CCyR and MMR was 3.2 v 6.0 and 15 v 36 months, respectively. In an intent-to-treat analysis, fewer pts receiving dasatinib (n=9; 3.5%) transformed to accelerated/blast phase v IM (n=15; 5.8%) on study or during follow-up after discontinuation. 24-month overall and progression-free survival were similar for dasatinib v IM: 95.4% v 95.2% and 93.7% v 92.1% (follow-up is ongoing). Few additional adverse events (AEs) were reported between 12 and 24 months in both arms, with grade 3/4 nonhematologic AE rates ≤1%. In each arm, 10 pts had a BCR-ABL mutation detected at time of discontinuation. For dasatinib v IM, 23% v 25% discontinued treatment for drug-related AEs (7% v 5%), progression (5% v 7%), failure (3% v 4%), unrelated AEs (2% v <1%), death (2% v <1%), and other (4% v 8%). Few pts discontinued between 12 and 24 months for dasatinib (n=19; 7%) and IM (n=16; 6%). Conclusions: Updated data with minimum 36-month follow-up will be presented, including mutation analyses in pts who discontinued, progressed, or had suboptimal response. Pts receiving dasatinib had a lower transformation rate and higher molecular responses v pts receiving IM, supporting the use of dasatinib in newly diagnosed CML-CP.

scholarly journals Final Study Results of Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Chronic Phase (CML-CP) Patients Receiving Radotinib 300 Mg BID or Imatinib: Rerise 48 Months Follow-up

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1733-1733
Author(s):  
Young Rok Do ◽  
Jae-Yong Kwak ◽  
Hawk Kim ◽  
Jeong-A Kim ◽  
Hyeoung-Joon Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Research Funding ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Standards Of Care ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Study Results

Abstract Background: In RERISE phase 3 study, radotinib demonstrated significantly higher and faster rates of major molecular response (MMR) than imatinib in patients with newly diagnosed CML-CP. By 36 months follow up, MMR (BCR-ABL1IS ≤ 0.1%) and MR4.5 (BCR-ABL1IS ≤ 0.0032%) in radotinib 300 mg twice daily (bid) were higher than imatinib group. Also, early molecular response (EMR) at 3 months could predict better long term outcomes in both radotinib and imatinib groups. Here, authors updated 48 months long-term benefits and risks of 300mg bid and imatinib 400mg qd from RERISE phase 3 study (NCT01511289). Methods: RERISE study was randomized trial of radotinib 300 mg bid (n=79), radotinib 400 mg bid (n=81), or imatinib 400 mg once daily (qd) (n=81) in patients with newly diagnosed CML-CP. We evaluated long-term MMR and MR4.5, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) including safety data by 48 months. Results: At the study completion, 53% of patients with radotinib and 44% of patients with imatinib treated were remained. MMR and MR4.5 continued to be higher in patients receiving radotinib 300 mg bid compared with imatinib 400mg qd (Table). Especially, MMR rate by 48 months was significantly higher for radotinib compared to imatinib (76% vs 56%; P=0.0070, Figure). Also, early molecular response (EMR) at 3 months were observed in 86% of patients in the radotinib 300 mg bid group and 68% in the imatinib group (P = 0.0179). More patients treated with radotinib 300mg bid who had EMR at 3 months achieved MMR and MR4.5 by 48 months: 84% and 53% in the radotinib 300 mg bid group and 71% and 44% in the imatinib group, respectively. 48 months estimated OS and PFS rate were not significantly different in two groups (99% vs 94%; P=0.3224, 97% vs 94%; P=0.4328). Treatment failure was lower in radotinib group compared with imatinib group (Table). The safety profiles were consistent with those previously reported and most of adverse events (AEs) developed within 12 months. No new or unexpected safety events were reported in both arms by 48 months and no serious CVE related with radotinib reported. Conclusions: With a minimum 48 months follow-up, radotinib continued to demonstrate higher rates of MMR and MR4.5 than imatinib in newly diagnosed CML-CP. Also, these responses with radotinib were earlier and deeper compared with imatinib. Up to 48 months, no new and serious safety events related with radotinib reported. These results demonstrate that radotinib may have higher possibility of treatment- free remission (TFR) on frontline therapy as well as it can be one of the standards of care in newly diagnosed CML-CP. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Bunworasate: IL-YANG: Research Funding. Comia:IL-YANG: Research Funding. Mun:IL-YANG: Research Funding. Caguioa:IL-YANG: Research Funding. Kim:Pfizer: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Ilyang: Research Funding.

Concept, Feasibility and Results of the Randomized Comparison of Imatinib Combination Therapies for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: The German CML-Study IV.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 1083-1083 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ute Berger ◽  
Andreas Hochhaus ◽  
Markus Pfirrmann ◽  
Claudia Schoch ◽  
Andreas Reiter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Blast Crisis ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
High Response ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Cytogenetic Data

Abstract Targeted therapy with the BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib induces high response rates in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients (pts). Nevertheless, residual disease remains in virtually all pts on imatinib monotherapy as a potential cause of relapse. In July 2002, the German CML-Study Group activated the four-armed randomized controlled trial comparing imatinib 400mg/d with imatinib+IFN, imatinib+Ara-C, and imatinib after IFN failure in newly diagnosed pts with chronic phase CML. Randomization is stratified according to prognostic risk groups and not biased by consecutive allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). High-risk pts are randomly assigned to primary imatinib-based therapies including a treatment arm with 800mg/d imatinib. By 7/05, 632 pts were randomized: imatinib 400mg/d (n=129), imatinib+IFN (n=179), imatinib+Ara-C (n=156), imatinib after IFN failure (n=157), and imatinib 800mg/d (n=11). According to the Hasford score, 35% of pts were low risk, 54% intermediate risk, and 11% high risk. At baseline, median WBC count was 67/nl (3–529), median platelet count 391/nl (34–2,799) and median hemoglobin 12.6 g/dl (6.1–16.6). We sought to evaluate results of pts with a &gt;12 months follow-up (n=416), recruited between 7/02 and 6/04 (imatinib 400mg/d, n=102; imatinib+IFN, n=126; imatinib+Ara-C, n=104; imatinib after IFN failure, n=81; imatinib 800mg/d, n=3) and of pts with a &gt;24 months follow-up (n=232), recruited between 7/02 and 6/03 (imatinib 400mg/d, n=55; imatinib+IFN, n=74; imatinib+Ara-C, n=54; imatinib after IFN failure, n=49) with respect to response, resistance, and progression. After 12 months of treatment cytogenetic data are available from 238/335 pts (71%) randomized to primary imatinib based therapies. 209 pts (63%) achieved a major cytogenetic remission (MCR; Ph+&lt;35%), being complete in 53%. Q-PCR data were available in 270 pts (81%). 89 pts (27%) achieved a major molecular response (MMR; ratio BCR-ABL/ABL &lt;0.12%). After 24 months cytogenetic data are available from 141/183 pts (77%). 126 pts (69%) achieved a MCR, being complete in 60%. Q-PCR data were available in 149 pts (81%). 73 pts (40%) achieved a MMR. 12/177 pts lost CCR (7%) during the 1st year and 6/110 pts (5%) during the 2nd year of treatment. Within the 1st year 13/335 pts (6 low, 3 intermediate, 4 high risk; 4%) progressed to blast crisis, 4 of them revealed clonal evolution (complex aberrant karyotype, n=3; +8, n=1), two others BCR-ABL mutations (E355G and M244V). Within the 2nd year 3/232 pts (1 each low, intermediate, and high risk; 1%) progressed to blast crisis. During the 1st year of treatment imatinib therapy was stopped due to side effects or resistance in 6% of pts in the imatinib 400mg arm, in 2% of pts in the imatinib+IFN, and in 2% of pts in the imatinib+Ara-C arm. IFN was stopped in 21%, Ara-C in 18% of pts. This interim analysis of a prospective randomized trial with imatinib and imatinib in combination for newly diagnosed pts with CML has proven feasibility of imatinib combinations in addition to high response and low progression rates. Long-term observation will demonstrate whether the promising results will be maintained and will improve survival.

Outcomes by Cytogenetic and Molecular Response at 12 and 18 Months of Imatinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) in Chronic Phase (CP) in the IRIS Trial.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 2138-2138
Author(s):  
Michele Baccarani ◽  
Francois Guilhot ◽  
Richard A. Larson ◽  
Stephen G. O’Brien ◽  
Brian J. Druker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blast Crisis ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Pcr Analysis ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Long term data is now available from the International Randomized Study of Interferon vs. STI571 (IRIS). We performed landmark analyses for pts on imatinib (IM) at 12 and 18 months (mos) (n=509 and n=480 respectively) and stratified for CCyR (Ph+ 0%), PCyR (Ph+ >0–35%) or No MCyR (Ph+ >35%) at both timepoints. Progression-free survival (PFS) included all progressions to accelerated phase or blast crisis during treatment with IM, whereas event-free survival (EFS) also included any loss of MCyR/CHR, increase in WBC and CML-unrelated deaths on treatment as events. Overall survival (OS) considered all deaths including those after discontinuation of IM and irrespective of whether pts went on to transplant. Outcomes in IM pts by cytogenetic response at 12 and 18 mos Estimated long-term outcomes at 60 mos (%) CcyR CcyR EFS PFS OS by 30 mos (%) by 60 mos (%) 12 mos landmark CCyR N = 350 93 97 95 – – PCyR N = 86 78 93 90 57 64 No MCyR N = 73 61 81 80 21 36 18 mos landmark CCyR N = 358 96 99 97 – – PCyR N = 66 80 90 90 38 50 No MCyR N = 56 69 83 82 11 27 Although the level of cytogenetic response was predictive for long-term outcomes, PFS and OS were not statistically significantly different between 12-mos CCyR and PCyR. Note that 64% of PCyR pts and 36% of pts without MCyR at 12 mos subsequently achieved CCyR. Using the 18-mos landmark, 50% of PCyR pts and 27% of pts without MCyR achieved CCyR at a later time. Long-term outcomes were evaluated based on available BCR-ABL transcript levels in pts with CCyR. A 3-log reduction from standardized baseline value in untreated pts was defined as a major molecular response (MMR). No pts who achieved both CCyR and MMR at 12 or 18 mos progressed to AP/BC by 60 mos. Approximately 5% of pts with CCyR but no MMR at 12 mos (p=0.007) and only 2% of CCyR pts without MMR at 18 mos (p=0.11) subsequently progressed. Of approximately 25% of CCyR pts with available PCR analysis who did not achieve MMR at 18 mos, about half did achieve MMR at a later time and their estimated EFS rate at 60 mths was 91%. At 60 mos, 69% of patients randomized to IM remained on treatment. Achievement of CCyR and MMR by 12 and 18 mos after start of IM in newly diagnosed CML-CP are predictive for favorable long-term outcomes. About 50% of pts in PCyR or CCyR at these time points eventually achieve CCyR and MMR, respectively, on continued IM treatment. The ability to identify patients who may be late responders should be further studied.

Imatinib Mesylate (IM) Versus IM + Low Dose of Pegylated Interferon Alfa 2a (Peg-IFN 2a) In Newly-Diagnosed Chronic-Phase (CP) Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML).

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 4497-4497
Author(s):  
Luis Antonio Meillon ◽  
Salvador Campos-Cabrera ◽  
Nancy Delgado-Lopez ◽  
Angel A. Fernandez-Martinez ◽  
Jesus Medrano-Contreras ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Primary Resistance ◽  
Initial Report

Abstract Abstract 4497 Background: IM 400mg daily is the current standard of treatment of CP CML. Almost 70% of patients achieve complete cytogenetic response (CCR) at 12 months (mo) (IRIS Trial) and the rate of Major Molecular Response (MMR) is 40% with IM 400mg daily (TOPS Trial). On the other hand, low doses of Peg-IFN 2a has the same efficacy and lower toxicity profile and cost as high dose, mainly when it is combined with other drugs (MRC and Hovon groups, Blood 2004; 103:4408). Combination of IM + Peg-IFN 2a or Cytarabine could increase the rate of response in CML. Aims: To evaluate the rates of CCR and MMR at 12 mo in Mexican patients with newly-diagnosed CP-CML treated with IM versus IM + Peg-IFN 2a. Methods: Between 2006 and 2008, 10 patients were randomized 1:1 and stratified by Sokal and Hasford risk groups. Cytogenetic and Molecular assesments were available for all patients. In the arm A of the study IM 400 mg daily was delivered. In the Arm B IM + Peg-IFN 2a was delivered at 400 mg daily + 90 μ g per week respectively. Peg-IFN 2a was started in the 7th week of treatment (Hochhaus A, et al ASCO 2003. Abstract #2287). Results: For this initial report, 10 patients were analyzed, median age was 35 years (25-55), 50% males; Sokal score was: low risk 70%, and high risk 30%. Hasford score was: low risk 40%, intermediate 30% and high risk 30%. All patients are alive with a median follow-up of 41 mo (30-48). CCR at 12 mo was obtained in 80% in both arms of treatment. MMR was obtained in 10% in patients with IM alone and 30% in patients with IM + Peg-IFN 2a. Overall the rate of primary resistance was 10% and the rate of suboptimal response was 10%. IM 400 mg was well tolerated. Peg-IFN 2a was tolerated in most patients, but needed discontinuation because increased cytopenias or other non hematologic toxicities. The median time of duration of treatment with Peg-IFN 2a was 6 mo (3-12). Conclusions: IM 400 mg and IM 400 mg + Peg-IFN 2a obtained similar rates of CCR. IM 400 mg + Peg-IFN 2a obtained a higher rate of MMR. The combination of IM 400 mg + Peg-IFN 2a is feasible. There is a slight increase in toxicity with this combination. Further follow-up is warranted for these patients. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Frontline Treatment With Imatinib Mesylate in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients in Early Chronic Phase: a Very Long-Term Analysis by the GIMEMA CML Working Party

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 258-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fausto Castagnetti ◽  
Gabriele Gugliotta ◽  
Massimo Breccia ◽  
Giorgina Specchia ◽  
Tamara Intermesoli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Working Party ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Background The chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) therapeutic scenario has been enriched by the approval of second generation TKIs as frontline treatment of early chronic phase (ECP) patients, but imatinib mesylate (IM) still represents the standard for many patients. The long term outcome is extremely important to assess the treatment efficacy and to decide on the allocation of resources. The phase 3 trials comparing second generation TKIs versus standard-dose IM have not still demonstrated a clear improvement in terms of progression-free survival and overall survival. In the IRIS trial, at 8 year, 55% of patients were still on IM and the overall survival (OS) was 85%. Other published reports have shorter follow-up. Aims and Methods To assess the very long-term outcome of CML patients treated frontline with IM, we analyzed 559 patients enrolled within 3 multicentric prospective studies conducted by the GIMEMA CML Working Party (NCT00514488, NCT00510926, observational trial CML023). Definitions: major molecular response (MMR), BCR-ABLIS ratio <0.1%; deep molecular response (MR4.0), detectable disease ≤ 0.01% BCR-ABLIS or undetectable disease with ≥10,000 ABL transcripts; progression, transformation to accelerated or blastic phase; failure, according to 2013 ELN criteria; event, treatment discontinuation for any reason or lost to follow-up. Information on survival and progression were regularly collected. All deaths, at any time and for any reason, were included. All the analysis have been made according to the intention-to-treat principle. Results Baseline demographics characteristics: median age: 52 years (extremes 18-84 years); male sex: 60%; high Sokal, high Euro and high EUTOS scores: 22%, 7% and 7%, respectively; clonal chromosomal abnormalities (CCA) in Ph+ cells: 4% (not evaluable in 32% of patients for insufficient number of metaphases); e13a2 BCR-ABL transcript: 36%. Median follow-up: 76 (7-99) months. The cumulative incidence of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR), MMR and MR4 was 88%, 85% and 61%, respectively. The median time to CCyR, MMR and MR4 was 6, 7 and 42 months, respectively. Patients with high Sokal, high Euro and high EUTOS scores had significantly lower overall estimated probability of CCyR and MMR with respect to low and intermediate risk patients. A high Sokal score also predicted a significantly inferior probability of MR4; patients with high Euro and high EUTOS score had lower overall estimated probability of MR4, but the difference were not statistically significant. The reasons for IM discontinuation were: lack of efficacy (19%), toxicity or death (9%), withdrawal of informed consent (3%); 4% of patients were lost to follow-up. The 8-year event-free survival (EFS), failure-free survival (FFS), progression-free survival (PFS) and OS were 55% (95% CI: 51-60%), 66% (95% CI: 61-70%), 84% (95% CI: 78-89%) and 85% (95% CI: 79-90%), respectively. A high Sokal and a high Euro scores were able to identify patients with significantly lower probability of EFS, FFS, PFS and OS with respect to the other patients. High EUTOS score patients had significantly poorer EFS and FFS, but PFS and OS differences were not significant. Age, performance status and e13a2 transcript resulted independent prognostic factors on PFS and OS. Conclusions Until now, the available data on the very long-term outcome of newly diagnosed chronic phase CML patients treated frontline with imatinib are limited to a company sponsored study (IRIS study). The GIMEMA CML Working Party provided an unbiased overview of the long-term imatinib therapeutic effects in a multicentric nationwide experience. These results should be taken into consideration to make treatment decision concerning the choice of the first line TKI, particularly in low risk patients. Acknowledgments University of Bologna, BolognaAIL, COFIN, Fondazione Carisbo. Disclosures: Castagnetti: Novartis Farma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Gugliotta:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Abruzzese:BMS, Novartis: Consultancy. Soverini:Novartis: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; ARIAD: Consultancy. Cavo:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document