Phase 1/2 Study of Tandutinib (MLN518) Plus Standard Induction Chemotherapy in Newly Diagnosed Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML).

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 158-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel J. DeAngelo ◽  
Philip C. Amrein ◽  
Tibor J. Kovacsovics ◽  
Rebecca B. Klisovic ◽  
Bayard L. Powell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Induction Chemotherapy ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Consolidation Therapy ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: Tandutinib is an orally bioavailable small molecule inhibitor of FLT3, c-KIT, and PDGFR with a single-agent MTD of 525 mg b.i.d. Tandutinib demonstrated single agent anti-leukemic activity in patients with relapsed/refractory AML with FLT3 ITD mutations, with ≥50% decreases in bone marrow and peripheral blast counts in 12/25 patients and 1 CR without platelet normalization. Since tandutinib is synergistic with cytarabine and daunorubicin in vitro, we sought to determine the MTD of tandutinib in combination with standard induction chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed AML, with or without FLT3 ITD mutations. Methods: A starting dose of Tandutinib 200 mg b.i.d was administered during induction and consolidation therapy, and for an additional 6 months. Induction therapy consists of cytarabine 200mg/m2/day IVCI, days 1–7, plus daunorubicin 60mg/m2/day, days 1–3. Consolidation therapy is given as 2–4 cycles of standard (3000mg/m2 IV every 12h, days 1, 3, 5) or in older patients modified (2000mg/m2/day IV, days 1–5) high-dose cytarabine. DLT is defined as failure to recover marrow function (ANC ≥500/μL; platelets ≥20,000/μL), or grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicity not resolved to grade 2 (except anorexia, alopecia, fatigue) by day 42 of induction therapy, or any unexpected grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicities. Results: 29 patients have been enrolled: median age 60y (range 26–83); 13M, 16F; 23 de novo, 6 secondary AML; 9 with unfavorable cytogenetics; 5 with FLT3 ITD mutations. Cohort 1 consisted of 7 patients treated with continuous daily dosing of tandutinib 200 mg b.i.d. Due to GI intolerance, the protocol was amended so that tandutinib was administered only on days 1–14 of induction therapy and each cycle of consolidation. Under the amended schedule 8 patients were treated with tandutinib 200 mg b.i.d. (Cohort 2) and 14 patients have been treated with tandutinib 500 mg b.i.d. (Cohort 3). Full safety and efficacy data are available for the 15 patients in cohorts 1 and 2. Diarrhea, nausea and vomiting have been the most common drug-related AEs, and were more frequent with continuous daily dosing of tandutinib. GI tolerance in Cohort 2 has been acceptable, with no patients requiring termination or reduction in tandutinib for GI toxicity. Although continuous dosing was not feasible, no DLTs were seen in Cohorts 1 or 2; one DLT consisting of obtundation not clearly related to tandutinib during induction occurred in Cohort 3, One patient in Cohort 3 experienced non-dose limiting generalized muscle weakness, which reversed within 24 hours after discontinuation of tandutinib. Tandutinib was restarted at a reduced dose in this patient without recurrence. 5/7 patients in Cohort 1 and 6/8 patients in Cohort 2 achieved a CR. PK data have been collected for all 15 patients in Cohorts 1 and 2; median steady state tandutinib concentration was 195 ng/mL (range: 52–486). Conclusions: Tandutinib 200 and 500 mg b.i.d. in combination with standard therapy for newly diagnosed AML appears well tolerated using the amended dosing schedule (days 1–14). Updated results from Cohort 3 (tandutinib 500 mg b.i.d) will be presented.

High Complete Remission Rate and Promising Outcome by Combination of Imatinib and Chemotherapy for Newly Diagnosed BCR-ABL-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 1827-1827
Author(s):  
Masamitsu Yanada ◽  
Jin Takeuchi ◽  
Isamu Sugiura ◽  
Hideki Akiyama ◽  
Noriko Usui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Remission Induction ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Combined Chemotherapy ◽  
Consolidation Therapy ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Conventional Chemotherapy ◽  
Allogeneic Hsct

Abstract The BCR-ABL gene rearrangement resulting from Philadelphia chromosome occurs in up to 30% of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), and its presence is known to be the most adverse prognostic factor for ALL. Because long-term survival cannot be achieved by conventional chemotherapy alone, there is a clear medical need for alternative treatment approaches. As a novel agent for this disease, imatinib, a selective inhibitor of BCR-ABL protein kinase, has been the subject of eager anticipation. Previous findings that single-agent treatment induced response in more than 50% of patients, but that the response was not durable, prompted us to plan a phase 2 study to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of imatinib-combined chemotherapy for newly diagnosed BCR-ABL-positive ALL. In the Japan Adult Leukemia Study Group (JALSG) ALL202 study, screening for BCR-ABL was performed in all patients at presentation, and those with positive BCR-ABL were treated with imatinib-combined chemotherapy. For remission induction therapy, imatinib was administered from day 8 to day 63 in combination with daunorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine (VCR) and prednisolone (PSL). Consolidation therapy consisted of an odd course (C1) comprising high-dose methotrexate and high-dose cytarabine and an even course (C2) with single-agent imatinib for 28 days. C1 and C2 were alternated for 4 cycles each. After the completion of the consolidation therapy, patients received maintenance therapy consisting of VCR, PSL and imatinib up to 2 years from the date they had attained CR. The daily dose of imatinib used in this study was 600mg. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) was recommended if a human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-identical sibling donor was available, and was allowed from an alternative donor. Between September 2002 and January 2005, 80 patients with a median age of 48 years (range, 15 to 63 years) were entered into the trial. Remission induction therapy resulted in complete remission (CR) in 77 (96.2%) patients, resistant disease in one, and early death in two. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) negativity was confirmed for 50.0% at the end of remission induction therapy. Severe toxicity was not different from that observed with conventional chemotherapy. Twenty-one (26.2%) required interruption of imatinib during the remission induction course, but none of the patients had to withdraw from the study at any time because of adverse events. Relapse occurred in 20 patients after median CR duration of 5.2 months. Allogeneic HSCT was performed for 46 patients, 36 of whom underwent transplantation in their first CR. The 2-year event-free and overall survival (OS) rates were estimated to be 44.9%, and 57.9%, respectively, both of which were significantly better than those for our historical controls treated with chemotherapy alone (p<0.0001 and p=0.0002). The probability for OS at 2 years was 51.5% for those who underwent allogeneic HSCT, and 84.2% for those who did not. These results showed that imatinib-combined regimen is effective and feasible for newly diagnosed BCR-ABL-positive ALL. Although longer follow-up is required to determine its overall effect on survival, this treatment clearly has a major potential for the treatment of BCR-ABL-positive ALL.

Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone (Rev/Vel/Dex) as Front-Line Therapy for Patients with Multiple Myeloma (MM): Preliminary Results of a Phase 1/2 Study.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 187-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Richardson ◽  
Sundar Jagannath ◽  
Noopur Raje ◽  
Andrzej Jakubowiak ◽  
Sagar Lonial ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Front Line ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
Dose Reductions

Abstract Background: Bortezomib (VELCADE®, Vel) as a single agent and lenalidomide (Revlimid®, Rev) plus dexamethasone (Dex) are approved for the treatment of relapsed MM patients (pts) following ≥1 prior therapy. Rev/Vel±Dex is active and well tolerated in relapsed/refractory MM, and Rev/Dex and Vel/Dex have substantial activity in front-line MM. The aims of this phase 1/2 study were to determine the MTD of Rev/Vel/Dex in newly diagnosed MM pts, and to assess safety and efficacy. Methods: Pts received Rev 15–25 mg on d 1–14, Vel 1.0–1.3 mg/m2 on d 1, 4, 8, 11, and Dex 40/20 mg (cycles 1–4/5–8) on d 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, for up to 8 21-d cycles, initially at 4 planned dose levels (Rev/Vel: 15/1.0, 15/1.3, 20/1.3, 25/1.3). Dose escalation proceeded (3-pt cohorts) depending on DLTs (G≥3 non-hematologic toxicity; G4 thrombocytopenia with platelets <10,000/mm3 on >1 occasion despite transfusion support; G4 neutropenia for >5 d and/or resulting in neutropenic fever; inability to receive cycle 2/d 1 dose due to drug-related toxicity). Based on safety data, dose level 4M was added with a reduced Dex starting dose (Rev/Vel 25/1.3, Dex 20 mg in all cycles). Toxicities were graded by NCI CTCAE v3.0. Pts with G>2 peripheral neuropathy (PNY) were excluded. Responses were assessed by modified EBMT and Uniform criteria. Pts with CR/nCR/VGPR/PR could proceed to ASCT after ≥4 cycles. Results: 33 pts (median age 56 yrs, 55% men, 84% IgG MM, 47% with ISS Stage II/III) have been enrolled to date in dose levels 1–4 and 4M, respectively, including 10 pts enrolled at the maximum planned dose (Dose Level 4M). Pts have received a median of 5 cycles; 9 pts have completed all 8 cycles. Two DLTs of G3 hyperglycemia due to high dose Dex were seen in dose level 4. Dose reductions in cycle 2 and beyond have occurred in dose levels 1–4 for Rev in 9 pts, Vel in 7 pts, and Dex in 17 pts, with 3 dose reductions having occurred in dose level 4M. Toxicities to date have been manageable. Only 1 G4 toxicity (thrombocytopenia) has been reported, plus 1 G3 DVT (reversed with LMWH), and no G≥3 PNY has been seen. The response rate across all dose cohorts (CR/nCR+VGPR+PR: subject to confirmation) is currently 89% in 25/28 evaluable pts, including 35% CR/nCR/VGPR. After median follow-up of 3 mos, median DOR, TTP, PFS, and OS have not been reached; all responders except 1 remain in remission, with 2 pts proceeding to ASCT. Conclusions: Rev/Vel/Dex is very active and well tolerated in newly diagnosed MM pts. The maximum planned dose has been reached at Rev 25 mg, Vel 1.3 mg/m2, and Dex 20 mg, with Phase 1 enrollment now complete using the lower dose of Dex. Enrollment to the Phase 2 component is ongoing.

A Phase 1/2 Study of G-CSF, Cladribine, Cytarabine, and Dose-Escalated Mitoxantrone (G-CLAM) in Adults with Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) or High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS)

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 1068-1068 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna B. Halpern ◽  
Megan Othus ◽  
Emily M Huebner ◽  
Kaysey F. Orlowski ◽  
Bart L. Scott ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Induction Chemotherapy ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

Abstract Introduction:"7+3" with standard doses of cytarabine and an anthracycline has remained the mainstay of induction chemotherapy for newly diagnosed AML. Since some studies have shown improved outcomes with high-dose cytarabine, cladribine, or escalated doses of anthracyclines, we conducted a phase 1/2 study (NCT02044796) of G-CLAM using escalated doses of mitoxantrone for newly diagnosed AML or high-risk MDS (>10% blasts). Methods: Patients≥18 years were eligible if they had treatment-related mortality (TRM) scores of ≤6.9 (corresponding to a predicted risk of early death with standard induction chemotherapy of ≤6.9%) and adequate organ function (LVEF ≥45%, creatinine ≤2.0 mg/dL, bilirubin ≤2.5 times upper limit of normal). Excluded were patients with uncontrolled infection or concomitant illness with expected survival <1 year. In phase 1, cohorts of 6-12 patients were assigned to 1 of 4 total dose levels of mitoxantrone (12, 14, 16, or 18 mg/m2/day, days 1-3, compared to 10 mg/m2/day used in standard dose G-CLAM previously established in relapsed/refractory AML). Other drug doses were G-CSF 300 or 480 μg/day (for weight </≥76 kg; days 0-5), cladribine 5 mg/m2/day (days 1-5), and cytarabine 2 g/m2/day (days 1-5). In phase 2, patients were treated at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of mitoxantrone. A second identical course of G-CLAM was given if complete remission (CR) was not achieved with cycle 1. Up to 4 cycles of consolidation with G-CLA (mitoxantrone omitted) were allowed if CR or CR with incomplete platelet or blood count recovery (CRp/i) was achieved with 1-2 cycles of induction therapy. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were: 1) grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity lasting >48 hours that resulted in >7-day delay of the subsequent treatment cycle; 2) grade ≥4 non-hematologic toxicity if recovery to grade ≤2 within 14 days, both excluding febrile neutropenia, infection or constitutional symptoms. Results: Among 33 patients (median age of 57.3 [range: 26-77], median TRM score 2.31 [0.16-5.90]) treated in phase 1, one DLT occurred at dose levels 3 and 4 (respiratory failure in both cases), establishing G-CLAM with mitoxantrone at 18 mg/m2/day as the MTD. Sixty-two patients, including 6 treated in phase 1, received G-CLAM at MTD. Patient characteristics were as follows: median age 58 (21-81) years, median TRM score 2.85 (0.06-6.73), with AML (n=52) or high-risk MDS (n=10). Cytogenetics were favorable in 6, intermediate in 44, and adverse in 12 (MRC criteria); 11 patients had NPM1 and 6 had FLT3 mutations. Fifty-two patients (83.9%, 95% confidence interval: 72.3-92.0%) achieved a CR (n=48 [77.4%: 65.0-87.1%]), or CRp/i (n=4 [6.5%: 1.8-15.7%]) with 1-2 cycles of therapy. Only 3 patients required 2 cycles to best response. Among the 48 CR patients, 43 (89.6%) were negative for measurable residual disease (MRDneg) by flow cytometry. Four patients had morphologic leukemia free state, 1 patient with myeloid sarcoma had a partial remission, 4 had resistant disease, and 1 died from indeterminate cause. One patient died within 28 days of treatment initiation (septic shock). Median times to an absolute neutrophil count ≥500/μL and a platelet count of ≥50,000/μL were 26 and 23 days. Besides infections and neutropenic fever, maculopapular rash, and hypoxia (fluid overload/infection-related) were the most common grade ≥3 adverse events. In addition to the phase 1/2 MTD cohort, there were 15 patients treated in an expansion cohort and 3 eligible patients treated off protocol with mitoxantrone at 18 mg/m2. For these 80 patients combined treated at MTD, the CR and CR/CRp/i rates were 76.3% and 81.2%. After multivariable adjustment, compared to 300 patients treated with 7+3 on the SWOG S0106 trial, G-CLAM with mitoxantrone 18mg/ m2 was associated with an increased probability of CR (odds ratio [OR]= 3.08, p=.02), CR/CRp/i (OR=2.96, p=.03), a trend towards improved MRDnegCR (OR= 3.70, p=.06), and a trend towards improved overall survival ([OS]; hazard ratio=0.34, p=.07). For the entire study cohort, the 6 and 12-month relapse-free survival were 73% (64-83%) and 62% (42-74%) and the 6 and 12-month OS were 89% (82- 96%) and 77% (67-88%). Conclusions: G-CLAM with mitoxantrone up to 18 mg/m2/day is well tolerated and has potent anti-leukemia activity. This regimen may warrant further randomized comparison with 7+3. We also plan to examine the addition of sorafenib to G-CLAM in newly diagnosed AML patients regardless of FLT3 status. Disclosures Othus: Glycomimetics: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Scott:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Speakers Bureau; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Becker:GlycoMimetics: Research Funding. Erba:Ariad: Consultancy; Gylcomimetics: Other: DSMB; Pfizer: Consultancy; Sunesis: Consultancy; Jannsen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Agios: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, DSMB, Speakers Bureau; Celator: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Ixazomib-Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone (IRd) Consolidation Following Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: A Large Multi-Center Phase II Trial

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 123-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ravi Vij ◽  
Nitya Nathwani ◽  
Thomas G. Martin ◽  
Mark A. Fiala ◽  
Abhinav Deol ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Consolidation Therapy ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Oral Regimen ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: Maintenance therapy post-autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has shown to improve progression-free and overall survival in multiple myeloma (MM) and has largely become the standard of care. Consolidation therapy, a brief duration of more-intensive chemotherapy administered prior to maintenance, has been shown to further deepen responses and may improve long-term outcomes. Ixazomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (IRd) is an all oral regimen that has been shown to be active in newly diagnosed MM as well as relapsed disease. In this study, we are analyzing the safety and efficacy of IRd as consolidation therapy after ASCT (NCT02253316). Methods: Eligible patients, age 18-70 with newly diagnosed MM undergoing ASCT during first-line treatment, are being consented prior to ASCT. Approximately 4 months following ASCT, patients receive 4 cycles of consolidation therapy with IRd [ixazomib 4 mg on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle, lenalidomide 15 mg on days 1 through 21, and dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1, 8 and 15]. The primary end point is minimal residual disease (MRD) status. MRD is being assessed by ClonoSEQ where possible and by multi-color flow where not. Toxicity, IMWG response rate, PFS, and OS are secondary end points. One month after the last consolidation cycle, patients are randomized (1:1) to maintenance therapy with single-agent ixazomib (4 mg on days 1, 8 and 15) or lenalidomide (15 mg daily). In total, 240 patients will be enrolled on the trial. This presentation coincides with planned interim analysis 2 which included data from the consolidation phase only. Results: As of July 2018, 172 patients with NDMM have been enrolled from 10 centers within the US. The median age was 57 (range 28-70) and 67% were male. 76% were white, 10% African-American/Black, and 13% were another race. 39% were ISS Stage I, 30% were Stage II, and 20% were Stage III. All patients received proteasome inhibitors and/or IMIDs as front-line induction and melphalan as conditioning for ASCT. IRd consolidation started at a median of 110 days post-ASCT (range 80-138). IRd has been well tolerated. Only 4% (6/154) of patients have been unable to complete the 4 cycles of consolidation to date due to toxicity. Grade 3 hematologic toxicity has been uncommon; 4% neutropenia, 3% thrombocytopenia, and 2% anemia. There has been no grade 4 hematologic toxicity. Non-hematologic grade 3-4 toxicities have included: infection (8%), nausea/vomiting/diarrhea (3%), and transaminitis (1%). No grade 3-4 peripheral neuropathy has been reported. One case of grade 5 pneumonia was reported but was not considered related to study treatment. Following ASCT, the MRD-negative rate was 26% and this improved to 37% following consolidation. In the subset of patients with Clonoseq results available, the MRD negative rate improved from 19% to 27%. Clinical response rate improved similarly; prior to consolidation the VGPR or better rate was 76% including 39% CR/sCR. Following consolidation, the VGPR or better rate was 85% including 56% CR/sCR. 137 patients went on to receive maintenance with either ixazomib (n = 71) or lenalidomide (n = 66). At time of submission, the median follow-up from start of IRd is 14 months and 28 patients have relapsed/progressed and 6 have expired. An interim analysis is planned for 2019, representing the first comparison of ixazomib and lenalidomide maintenance. Conclusion: IRd consolidation following ASCT appears to be safe and effective. The all oral regimen is convenient for patients which greatly simplifies follow-up in the peri-transplant period. Study enrollment is scheduled to complete in Q1 of 2019. Disclosures Vij: Karyopharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Jansson: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Martin:Amgen: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy. Deol:Kite Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Kaufman:Janssen: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Other: data monitoring committee; BMS: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy. Hofmeister:Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive biotechnologies: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Gregory:Poseida Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding. Berdeja:Amgen: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Poseida Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Bluebird: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Glenmark: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Teva: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding. Chari:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Array Biopharma: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; The Binding Site: Consultancy.

INNV-28. POTENTIAL EFFECTIVE CONSOLIDATION THERAPY WITH SINGLE AGENT IBRUTINIB FOR A CASE WITH PRIMARY CNS LYMPHOMA AFTER INITIAL HD-MTX AND RITUXIMAB INDUCTION THERAPY

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi111-vi111
Author(s):  
Steven Du ◽  
Uvin Ko ◽  
Daniela Bota ◽  
Xiao-Tang Kong
Keyword(s):  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Brain Mri ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Primary Cns Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Cns Lymphoma ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Consolidation Therapy ◽  
Left Lateral Ventricle

Abstract INTRODUCTION Primary CNS Lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare and aggressive cancer that originates from lymphocytes and develops in the central nervous system. Standard induction therapy involves high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX)-based chemotherapy, which achieves complete or partial response in most PCNSL patients. However, there is no standard consolidation therapy. We report one case in which ibrutinib, a Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor, replaced low-dose WBRT as consolidation therapy after induction by HD-MTX and rituximab. Ibrutinib treatment yielded good tolerance and further resolution of small residue lymphoma. CASE REPORT The patient is a 77-year-old female who presented with slurred speech, right-sided weakness, and difficulty word-finding in early 2020. Brain MRI found multifocal lesions, and biopsy of the largest lesion near the left lateral ventricle revealed diffuse large B cell lymphoma. The patient began HD-MTX at 6 g/m2 for the first cycle of induction therapy. She continued HD-MTX every two weeks, but dosage was reduced every cycle due to worsening renal function. Ultimately, MTX was discontinued after 6 cycles. Brain MRI showed significant response after HD-MTX except for small residue lymphoma at the biopsy area. 2nd line regimen rituximab and temozolomide was given to complete induction. Brain MRI was stable, but the small enhancing residue lymphoma at left peri-ventricle area was persistent after the induction therapy (uCR). Ibrutinib as consolidation therapy began after discussion with the patient. The patient tolerated 560 mg ibrutinib for 6 cycles initially, then switched to a reduced dose of 420 mg for cycles 7 and 8 due to neutropenia. Brain MRIs have been stable with resolution of the small lymphoma residue after 6 cycles of ibrutinib. The patient continues ibrutinib for the goal of one year of consolidation therapy. DISCUSSION Our case highlights the potential of single-agent ibrutinib as consolidation therapy for PCNSL after HD-MTX and rituximab/temzolomide induction therapy.

Outcome with the Hyper-CVAD and Imatinib Mesylate Regimen in Philadelphia (Ph) Positive Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia (ALL).

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 1830-1830 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah A. Thomas ◽  
Stefan Faderl ◽  
Jorge Cortes ◽  
Susan O’Brien ◽  
Francis Giles ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Imatinib Mesylate ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Cell Transplant

Abstract In Ph+ ALL, complete remission (CR) rates with intensive chemotherapy such hyper-CVAD is 90%, but most patients (pts) relapse within a median time of 16 months [Kantarjian et al, JCO18:547, 2000; Kantarjian et al, Cancer101:2788, 2004]. Single agent therapy with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib mesylate in relapsed or refractory Ph+ ALL or chronic myelogenous leukemia in lymphoid blast phase yielded CR rates of 20% with rapid disease recurrence. A phase II clinical trial of concurrent hyper-CVAD and imatinib was designed to improve these results, with the initial regimen of imatinib 400 mg orally daily days 1–14 of each course (fractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine [VCR], doxorubicin and dexamethasone alternating with high dose methotrexate and cytarabine) followed by imatinib, VCR and prednisone maintenance with intensifications months 6 and 13. Allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT) was performed in CR if feasible. Preliminary results of first 20 pts treated were encouraging [Thomas et al, Blood103:4396, 2004]. Recent modifications included increasing dosing of imatinib to 600 mg daily days 1–14 of course 1, then daily if tolerated with courses 2–8. Maintenance was extended to 24 months with imatinib indefinitely. To date, 43 pts with Ph+ ALL have been treated from April 2004 to July 2005. Thirty-six pts had active disease, either untreated (n=31) or refractory (n=1) to one induction course without imatinib; 7 pts were in CR after one induction course without imatinib. Of 35 evaluable pts, 33 (94%) achieved CR (1 induction death, 1 failed to meet platelet criteria for CR). Median days to response was 21 days. 13 pts underwent allogeneic SCT within a median of 3 months from start of therapy (range, 1–12). After a median follow-up of 3 yrs (range 1–48 months), 1 primary refractory pt relapsed at 12 months, 1 de novo pt had isolated CNS relapse, 2 pts relapsed after allogeneic SCT (no post SCT imatinib) and 2 pts changed therapy for persistent Ph+ metaphases (1 relapsing). Deaths in CR included 5 older pts without allogeneic SCT (1 osteomyelitis, 1 mucormycosis, 1 C. difficile colitis, 1 sudden death, 1 GNR sepsis) and 4 pts after allogeneic SCT (3 graft-versus-host disease, 1 GNR sepsis). Outcome with the hyper-CVAD and imatinib regimen continues to demonstrate favorable disease-free survival rates compared with hyper-CVAD alone, particularly for the de novo group. Use of higher dose imatinib concurrently appears to be feasible. Molecular response rates appear to be improved with the higher dose imatinib; additional accrual will be required to assess impact of modifications, including role of allogeneic SCT.

High Dose Imatinib Induction Therapy (800 mg/day, 6 Months) In Pre-Treated Chronic Phase CML Patients Improves Cytogenetic and Molecular Responses but Does Not Improve Overall and Progression Free Survival – Final Results of the CELSG Phase III CML11 “ISTAHIT” Trial

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2271-2271
Author(s):  
Andreas L Petzer ◽  
Dominic Fong ◽  
Thomas Lion ◽  
Irina Dyagil ◽  
Zvenyslava Masliak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 2271 Introduction: Imatinib 400 mg/day represents the current standard treatment for de novo as well as pre-treated CML patients in chronic phase (CP). Recent randomized phase III trials revealed conflicting results concerning the potential higher efficacy of dose-increased imatinib in de novo treated CP-CML. Methods: We here present the final analyses including response data, OS, EFS and PFS of the multicenter, randomised, 2-arm phase III CELSG “ISTAHIT” trial evaluating imatinib high dose (HD) induction (800 mg/day, 6 months) followed by 400 mg/day as maintenance (experimental arm B) compared to continuous imatinib standard dose (400mg/day; arm A) in pre-treated CP CML patients. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT0032726. Results: From a total of 243 patients screened for inclusion, 16 patients were not eligible (mainly due to non sufficient numbers of metaphases obtainable from the bone marrow before the start of the study). Of the remaining 227 patients, 113 patients were randomized into arm A and 114 patients into the experimental arm B. Subsequent data are presented as per protocol. No significant differences between treatment groups were observed regarding sex (55.5% female, 44.5% male), age (median: 46.3 years, range 18 –76), Sokal scores at diagnosis (30% low, 41% intermediate, 16% Sokal high risk, 13% unknown) and different pre-treatments, which included hydroxyurea (96%), interferon (72%), busulfan (17%) and “others” (26%; mainly Ara-C). The median observation time was 673 days. Cytogenetic responses were generally higher in the experimental arm B and revealed statistically significant differences in major cytogenetic responses (MCyR) at 3 and 6 months (month 3: 25.8% arm A, 48.3% arm B, p=0.002; month 6: 41.9% arm A, 58.8% arm B, p=0.029) as well as in complete cytogenetic responses (CCyR) not only during imatinib HD therapy (month 3: 7.5% arm A, 29.9% arm B, p<0.001; month 6: 20.4% arm A, 47.4% arm B, p<0.001) but also thereafter (month 12: 31.8% arm A, 52.9% arm B, p=0.006). The primary endpoint of the study, the achievement of an improved MCyR at 12 month was, however, not significantly different (56.8% arm A, 64.4% arm B). In line with improved cytogenetic responses, major molecular response (MMRIS) rates were also significantly better at 3, 6 and even at 24 months in the HD arm B (month 3: 3.7% arm A, 15.9% arm B, p=0.003; month 6: 9.4% arm A, 34.6% arm B, p<0.001; month 24: 26.5% arm A, 42.5% arm B, p=0.034). Surprisingly, however, this impressing improvement in cytogenetic and molecular remissions in patients achieving high dose imatinib as induction therapy did not translate into a better OS and PFS, both of which were comparable in the two treatment arms (OS: p=0.25; EFS: p=0.37). Moreover, the EFS was even significantly worsened in the experimental arm B (p=0.014). Grade 3/4 non-haematological toxicities during the first 6 months of therapy were comparable, whereas grade 3/4 haematological toxicities were significantly more common in the imatinib HD arm B. Conclusions: Although high dose imatinib induction induces more rapid and higher cytogenetic and molecular remission rates in pre-treated CP CML patients, OS as well as PFS were not improved and EFS was even worsened in the high dose induction arm B. Therefore we conclude that imatinib 400mg/day remains the standard of care for pre-treated CP-CML patients. Disclosures: Petzer: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Imatinib 800mg is not licensed as the initial therapy of chronic phase CML. Lion: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Bogdanovic: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Griskevicius: Novartis: Research Funding. Kwakkelstein: Celgene: Employment. Rancati: Novartis: Consultancy, Employment, Equity Ownership, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Gastl: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Wolf: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Activity of Oxaliplatin in Patients With Relapsed or Cisplatin-Refractory Germ Cell Cancer: A Study of the German Testicular Cancer Study Group

2002 ◽  
Vol 20 (8) ◽  
pp. 2031-2037 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Kollmannsberger ◽  
O. Rick ◽  
H.-G. Derigs ◽  
N. Schleucher ◽  
P. Schöffski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Germ Cell ◽  
Patient Population ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Germ Cell Cancer ◽  
Cross Resistance ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Grade 3

PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy and toxicity of oxaliplatin, a diaminocyclohaxane platinum derivative with incomplete cross-resistance to cisplatin in patients with relapsed or cisplatin-refractory germ cell cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients with nonseminomatous cisplatin-refractory germ cell cancer or relapsed disease after high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) plus autologous stem-cell support were treated with single-agent oxaliplatin 60 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 repeated every 4 weeks (group 1; n = 16) or oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 given on days 1 and 15 of a 4-week cycle (group 2; n = 16). Patients were pretreated with a median of seven (range, three to 13) cisplatin-containing treatment cycles; 78% had received carboplatin/etoposide-based HDCT before oxaliplatin therapy. Twenty-seven patients (84%) were considered refractory (n = 20; 63%) or absolutely refractory (n = 7; 22%) to cisplatin therapy. RESULTS: Overall, four patients achieved a partial remission (13%; 95% confidence interval, 1% to 24%). Two additional patients achieved disease stabilization. All responses were observed in cisplatin-refractory patients, including three who had not responded to previous HDCT. Patients received a median two cycles of oxaliplatin with a median cumulative dose of 350 mg/m2. Hematologic toxicity was generally mild, with five patients developing grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia. Nonhematologic side effects consisted mainly of nausea/vomiting. One patient developed grade 3 neurotoxicity. CONCLUSION: Considering the particularly unfavorable prognostic characteristics of this patient population compared with patients from previous trials for new drugs in germ cell cancer, eg, paclitaxel and gemcitabine, a 13% overall response rate and a 19% response rate in the group treated with oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 seems to be of interest. Oxaliplatin may be a palliative treatment option for this patient population, and evaluation in combination regimens is warranted.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document