Decision Criteria for the Futility of Intensive Chemotherapy in Older Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML).

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 2861-2861 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hervé Dombret ◽  
Jean-Valère Malfuson ◽  
Anne Etienne ◽  
Pascal Turlure ◽  
Thierry de Revel ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims and methods. We have recently reported results of intensive chemotherapy in 416 patients with AML aged 65 years or more (median, 72 years) treated in the ALFA-9803 trial (Gardin et al., Blood 2007). We show here the impact of pretreatment characteristics on short-term mortality in these patients (32% at 6 months in the whole population). A first objective was to evaluate the prognostic value of the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and Sorror Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Comorbidity Index (HCTCI), but the main objective was to screen the most frequent characteristics individually or in combination, including comorbidities, for their sensitivity in short-term mortality prediction. The aim was to propose decision criteria to advice against the intensive approach in high-risk patients, defined here by the presence of at least one characteristic associated with a probability of death at 6 months of 50% or more. Value of comorbidity scores. Both comorbidity scores correlated pretty well (CCI 0/1/2 = 353/57/6; HCTCI 0/1/2/3+ = 268/85/42/21; P<0.001), but only HCTCI was predictive of mortality (P<0.001). Other independent factors were age, PS, and cytogenetics. As all these patients were previously selected as suitable for intensive chemotherapy, only four HCTCI comorbidities were, however, relatively frequent (prevalence ≥ 5%): coronary artery disease (10%), arrhythmia (8%), infection (8%), and diabetes (7%). Impact on mortality was only due to the demarcation of very few high-risk patients (N=21) limiting the clinical interest of HCTCI in treatment decision making. Of note, HCTCI did not correlate with advanced age or PS in this patient population. Definition of decision criteria. Further analysis of the predictive value of each characteristic or combination identified three decision criteria, each being predictive of 6-month mortality ≥ 50% (Table 1): high-risk cytogenetics, pre-treatment documented infection, and PS ≥ 2 if age ≥ 75 years. Taken together, these 3 criteria, which were validated in an independent set of 123 patients, allowed to demarcate 94 high-risk patients (23%) with a probability of death at 6 months of 57%, as compared to 26% in the remaining patients (P<0.001, by log-rank test). We propose thus to add these criteria to usual eligibilty criteria in order to better define the population of older AML patients who will draw a significant benefit from intensive chemotherapy. Table 1. Short-term mortality associated with most frequent Characteristic. Characteristic Prevalence Median OS (mo) 6-month mortality High-risk cytogenetics 12% 4.8 64% Documented infection 8% 4.7 63% PS≥2 and age≥75 years 7% 2.9 54% PS≥2 27% 7.0 47% Age≥75 years 20% 7.9 42% Coronary artery disease 10% 6.8 43% Diabetes 7% 14.2 41% Arrhythmia 8% 14.6 31% Post–MDS AML 15% 10.6 29%

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor Plat ◽  
Wessel Stam ◽  
Boukje Bootsma ◽  
Jennifer Straatman ◽  
Thomas Klausch ◽  
...  

Abstract   Transthoracic esophagectomy (TTE) for esophageal cancer facilitates mediastinal dissection, however it has a significant impact on cardiopulmonary status. High-risk patients may therefore be better candidates for transhiatal esophagectomy (THE) in order to prevent serious complications. This study addressed short-term outcome following TTE and THE in patients that are considered to have a higher risk of surgery-related morbidity. Methods This population-based study included patients who underwent a curative esophagectomy between 2011 and 2018, registered in the Dutch Upper GI Cancer Audit. The Charlson comorbidity index was used to assign patients to a low-risk (score ≤ 1) and high-risk group (score ≥ 2). Propensity score matching was applied to produce comparable groups between high-risk patients receiving TTE and THE. Primary endpoint was mortality (in-hospital/30-day mortality), secondary endpoints included morbidity and oncological outcomes. Additionally, a matched subgroup analysis was performed, including only cervical reconstructions. Results Of 5438 patients, 945 and 431 high-risk patients underwent TTE and THE respectively. After propensity score matching, mortality (6.3% vs 3.3%, P = 0.050), overall morbidity, Clavien-Dindo ≥3 complications, pulmonary complications, cardiac complications and re-interventions were significantly more observed after TTE compared to THE. A significantly higher mortality after TTE with a cervical reconstruction was found compared to THE (7.0% vs 2.2%, P = 0.020). Conclusion Patients with a high Charlson comorbidity index predispose for a complicated postoperative course after esophagectomy, this was more outspoken after TTE compared to THE. In daily practice these outcomes should be balanced with the lower lymph node yield, but comparable positive node count and radicality after THE.


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 485-491
Author(s):  
О. К. Gogayeva

The aim: to determine the comorbidity index before cardiac surgery in high-risk patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Materials and methods. A retrospective analysis of data from 354 random high-risk patients who underwent a surgery and were discharged from National M. Amosov Institute of Cardiovascular Surgery affiliated to National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine during the period 2009–2019. The mean age of patients was 61.9 ± 9.6 years. All the patients were examined: ECG, ECHO CG, coronary angiography before the surgery as well as Charlson comorbidity index was calculated and a risk on the scales EuroSCORE I, EuroSCORE II and STS was stratified. Results. I–III degree obesity was revealed in 133 (37.5 %) patients, patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) were more likely to have BMI >30 kg/m2 (P = 0.017). Patients with normal weight had a carotid artery stenosis >50 % (P = 0.014) and history of stroke (P = 0.043) significantly more frequently. No differences in comorbidity of overweight and normal weight patients were detected (5.73 ± 1.70 vs. 5.9 ± 1.8, P = 0.4638). Type 2 DM was diagnosed in 90 (25.4 %) patients. In the case of normoglycemia, the comorbidity index was significantly lower than in type 2 DM (4.88 ± 1.38 vs. 6.60 ± 2.03, P = 0.0001) and glucose intolerance 5.8 ± 1.5 (P < 0.0001). Chronic kidney disease (CKD) G3a–G4 stages was diagnosed in 132 (37.2 %) patients. Significant higher comorbidity was found in patients with G3a–G4 stages CKD in comparison to those with G1–G2 stages CKD – 6.33 ± 1.78 vs. 5.46 ± 1.60 (P < 0.0001). Among comorbidities in patients with gouty arthritis, type 2 DM (P < 0.0001), obesity (P = 0.0080), CKD G3a–G4 (P = 0.0020) and varicose veins of the lower extremities (P = 0.0214) were significantly more common. Preoperative risk stratification according to the EuroSCORE II scale averaged 8.8 %. Conclusions. Preoperative analysis of baseline status in CAD patients showed the high Charlson comorbidity index, which averaged 5.7 ± 1.7. The weak direct correlation between the comorbidity index and the high predicted cardiac risk on the ES II scale (r = 0.2356, P = 0.00001), length of stay in the intensive care unit (r = 0.1182, P = 0.0262) and discharge after the surgery (r = 0.1134, P = 0.0330) was found.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adi Elias ◽  
Reham Agbarieh ◽  
Walid Saliba ◽  
Johad Khoury ◽  
Fadel Bahouth ◽  
...  

AbstractAcute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) is one of the leading causes for hospitalization and mortality. Identifying high risk patients is essential to ensure proper management. Sequential Organ Function Assessment Score (SOFA) is considered an excellent score to predict short-term mortality in sepsis and other life-threatening conditions. To assess the capability of SOFA score in predicting short-term mortality in ADHF. We retrospectively identified patients with first hospitalization with primary diagnosis of ADHF between the years (2008–2018). The SOFA score was calculated for all patients. A total 3232 patients were included in the study. The SOFA score was significantly associated with in-hospital mortality and 30-day mortality. The odds ratios for 1-point increase in the SOFA score were 1.86 (95% CI 1.68–1.96) and 1.627 (95% CI 1.523–1.737) respectively. The SOFA Score demonstrated a good predictive accuracy. The areas under the curve of receiver operating characteristic curves for in-hospital mortality and 30-day mortality were 0.765 (95% CI 0.733–0.798) and 0.706 (95% CI 0.676–0.736) respectively. SOFA score is associated with increased risk of short-term mortality in ADHF. SOFA can be used as a complementary risk score to screen high risk patients who need strict monitoring.


Heart Views ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 45
Author(s):  
MouazH Al-Mallah ◽  
Iyad Farah ◽  
AmjadM Ahmed ◽  
Raed Odeh ◽  
Eltayyeb Alameen ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. E5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Lanzino ◽  
Richard D. Fessler ◽  
Robert A. Mericle ◽  
Ajay K. Wakhloo ◽  
Lee R. Guterman ◽  
...  

Following the favorable results obtained in the treatment of coronary artery disease, combined angioplasty and stenting has been advocated for the treatment of carotid artery stenosis as well. Although widespread application of angioplasty and stenting for carotid artery disease is neither indicated nor recommended, it may be a viable alternative therapy for select patients who are high-risk patients for surgery. The results of early series have suggested that endoluminal revascularization in these high-risk patients can be performed with an acceptable degree of safety. Although the incidence of death and major stroke rates following angioplasty and stenting procedures compares favorably with surgery, results of more recent clinical series have suggested that the incidence of perioperative transient neurological events and minor strokes may be higher than suggested by earlier reports, especially in patients with recent neurological symptoms and “unstable” plaques. In this article, the authors review the current potential indications for and preliminary results of angioplasty and stenting and describe their procedural technique. In addition, potential applications of stenting to intracranial thromboocclusive carotid artery disease are reviewed.


Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 129 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
David M Kern ◽  
Sanjeev Balu ◽  
Ozgur Tunceli ◽  
Swetha Raparla ◽  
Deborah Anzalone

Introduction: This study aimed to compare the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with different risk factors for CHD as defined by NCEP ATP III guidelines. Methods: Dyslipidemia patients (≥1 medical claim for dyslipidemia, ≥1 pharmacy claim for a statin, or ≥1 LDL-C value ≥100 mg/dL [index date]) aged ≥18 y were identified from the HealthCore Integrated Research Environment from 1/1/2007-7/31/2012. Patients were classified as low risk (0 or 1 risk factor): hypertension, age ≥45 y [men] or ≥55 y [women], or low HDL-C), moderate/moderately high risk (≥2 risk factors), high risk (having CHD or CHD risk equivalent), or very high risk (having ACS or other established cardiovascular disease plus diabetes or metabolic syndrome). Demographics, comorbidities, medication use and lipid levels during the 12 months prior, and statin use during the 6 months post-index date were compared across risk groups (very high vs each other risk group). Results: There were 1,524,351 low-risk (mean age: 47 y; 45% men), 242,357 moderate-risk (mean age: 58 y; 59% men), 188,222 high-risk (mean age: 57 y; 52% men), and 57,469 very-high-risk (mean age: 63 y; 61% men) patients identified. Mean Deyo-Charlson comorbidity score differed greatly across risk strata: 0.20, 0.33, 1.26, and 2.22 from low to very high risk (p<.0001 for each). Compared with high-risk patients, very-high-risk patients had a higher rate of ischemic stroke: 5.4% vs 4.1%; peripheral artery disease: 17.1% vs 11.6%; coronary artery disease: 8.5% vs 8.2%; and abdominal aortic aneurysm: 2.3% vs 2.0% (p<.05 for each). Less than 1% of the total population had a prior prescription for each non-statin lipid-lowering medication (bile acid sequestrants, fibrates, ezetimibe, niacin, and omega-3). Very-high-risk patients had lower total cholesterol (very-high-risk mean: 194 mg/dL vs 207, 205, and 198 mg/dL for low-, moderate-/moderately-high-, and high-risk patients, respectively) and LDL-C (very-high-risk mean: 110 mg/dL vs 126, 126, and 116 mg/dL for the other risk groups; p<.0001 for each); higher triglycerides (TG) (very-high-risk mean: 206 mg/dL vs 123, 177, and 167 mg/dL for the other groups; p<.0001 for each); and lower HDL-C (very-high-risk mean: 45 mg/dL vs 57 [p<.0001], 45 [p=.006], and 51 mg/dL [p<.0001]). Statin use was low overall (15%), but higher in the very-high-risk group (45%) vs the high- (29%), moderate-/moderately-high- (18%), and low- (12%) risk groups (p<.0001 for each). Conclusions: Despite a large proportion of patients having high lipid levels, statin use after a dyslipidemia diagnosis was low: ≥80% of all patients (and more than half at very high risk) failed to receive a statin, indicating a potentially large population of patients who could benefit from statin treatment. Prior use of non-statin lipid-lowering medications was also low considering the high TG and low HDL-C levels among high-risk patients.


ESC CardioMed ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 923-924
Author(s):  
Nikolaus Marx

Patients with diabetes exhibit an increased propensity to develop cardiovascular disease with an increased mortality. Early risk assessment, especially for coronary artery disease, is important to initiate therapeutic strategies to reduce cardiovascular risk. This chapter reviews the current literature on risk scores in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes and summarizes the role of risk assessment based on biomarkers and different imaging strategies. Current guidelines recommend that patients with diabetes are characterized as high-risk or very high-risk patients. In the presence of target organ damage or other risk factors such as smoking, marked hypercholesterolaemia, or hypertension, patients with diabetes are classified as very high-risk patients while most other people with diabetes are categorized as high-risk patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Stanciu ◽  
M Gurzun ◽  
S Dumitrescu ◽  
F Naftanaila ◽  
A Spanu ◽  
...  

Abstract Coronary artery calcium score (CAC) measures the calcium contained in the artery wall and it is evaluated using multi-slice cardiac CT and CAC represents a useful tool for appreciating the burden of coronary atherosclerosis and for determining the risk for cardiovascular events. The purpose of this study is that CAC can be use for guiding treatment strategy in patients classified as high risk based on Framingham score . We prospectively enrolled 64 pts (79% male), 62,7+/-5 year, between 2002-2017. All included patients were considered high risk based on EuroSCORE model. A multislice heart CT scan was performed for every patient with CAC score determination quantified with the Agatston score and expressed as Agatston Units (AU). The patients were divided in 3 groups according to the treatment that they received during the 5 years follow up: optimal medical treatment for coronary artery disease (OMT) – 35.9% (23), percutaneous coronary angioplasty (PCA) – 29.7% (19) and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) – 34.4%. The CAC score for pts treated by OMT vs CABG +/_ PCA were compared using the ROC curves. CAC score was statistically significantly superior in CABG+ PCA patients versus OMT (AUC: 0.96, p &lt; 0.001 vs AUC 0.42, p = 0.212). Also, a comparison of CAC score score for CABG vs OMT revealed the same results (AUC: 0.96, p&lt; 0.001 vs AUC: 0.42, p = 0.264). OMT vs CABG + PCA presented a cut-off value of 382 AU with a specificity of 90% and a sensitivity of 95%. OMT vs CABG presented a cut-off value of 530 AU with a specificity of 89% and a sensitivity of 95%. In conclusion, CAC score has a good predictability and sensitivity in determining the outcome and can be a promising tool to guide therapy in high risk patients, mainly regarding medical vs surgical treatment for coronary artery disease.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document