FCGR3A-158V/F Polymorphism May Correlate with the Levels of Immunoglobulin in Patients with Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma after Rituximab Treatment as An Adjuvant to Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation.

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 3245-3245
Author(s):  
Mitsufumi Nishio ◽  
Tomoyuki Endo ◽  
Katsuya Fujimoto ◽  
Satoshi Yamamoto ◽  
Masato Obara ◽  
...  

Abstract Recent studies have indicated that patients who receive stem cell transplantation (SCT) and an adjuvant rituximab demonstrate an increased risk of developing hypogammaglobulinemia. We have found that such hypogammaglobulinemia were due to the delayed recovery of memory B cells with an abnormal cell marker expression and impaired immunoglobulin production in vitro. (Nishio et al. Eur J Haemtol, 2006, Nishio et al. Br J Haematol, 2007) However, no speculation has been made regarding what factor(s) determined the risk of developing hypogammaglobulinemia after autologous SCT with the identical conditioning regimen and rituximab. Accumulated evidences have shown that FCGR3A of valine (V) allele has a higher affinity to human IgG than the phenylalanine (F) allele, and that cells bearing the FCGR3A V allele mediate antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity more effectively. Compatibly, previous clinical studies that have examined single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of Fc receptor genes demonstrated that FCGR3A gene SNPs are associated with the response to rituximab, as a single agent, in patients with follicular lymphoma or Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia. These findings suggest that FCGR3A SNPs may be related to the levels of immunoglobulin after SCT and an adjuvant rituximab. To clarify this hypothesis, the FCGR3A-158V/F genotype and the levels of serum immunoglobulin six months after SCT were tested in twenty non- Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) patients having received autlogous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (APBSCT) with an adjuvant rituximab. We also compared the levels of immunoglobulin in ten NHL patients who received an identical conditioning regimen and APBSCT, but no rituximab (control group). Of the twenty patients tested for the FCGR3A-158V/F polymorphism, seven patients (35%) had homozygous F/F (158 F/F), 12 (60%) had heterozygous V/F (158 V/F), and one (5%) had homozygous V/V (158 V/V). Since only one patient was found to have 158 V/V polymorphism in this study, we defined those patients who had 158 F/F as the low affinity group, while those who had at least one 158 V allele were defined as the high affinity group following the previous definition by Anolik et al (Arthritis Rheum 2003). The three groups were not different in terms of gender, age, the disease stage, bone marrow involvement or number of extranodal sites involved at diagnosis. Before starting induction therapy, there was no significant difference in the levels of immunoglobulin among three groups. However, after APBSCT, the levels of IgG were significantly lower in the low affinity group (6.87 ± 2.38 g/l) than those in the high affinity group (10.20 ± 2.43 g/l) and control group (10.64 ± 3.04 g/l; both P<0.05). In addition, a significant difference was seen in the levels of IgA between the low affinity group (0.95 ± 0.64 g/l) and control group (1.63 ± 0.51 g/l) (P<0.05). The levels of IgA in the high affinity group (1.19 ± 0.55 g/l) were not significantly different from either those of control group or the low affinity group. In contrast to the levels of IgG or IgA, no significant differences were observed in the levels of IgM among three groups. These data suggest that the FCGR3A genotype may influence not only the outcome of rituximab therapy, but also the levels of IgG and IgA after APBSCT and rituximab.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 4980-4980
Author(s):  
Issa F. Khouri ◽  
Rima M. Saliba ◽  
Daniel R. Couriel ◽  
Grace-Julia Okoroji ◽  
Sandra Acholonu ◽  
...  

Abstract It has been postulated that B cells functioning as antigen-presenting cells may have an important role in the pathogenesis of GVHD. Depletion of donor cells from B-cells resulted in a low incidence of GVHD in mouse model (Schultz et al. BMT1995:16:289–289). More recently, we observed a lower incidence of chronic (and to a lesser extent acute GVHD) in patients with CLL who received an allogeneic stem cell transplantation after a non-myeloablative conditioning regimen containing rituximab (Exp Hematol32:28–35, 2004). The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of rituximab on GVHD in the setting of a more intense chemotherapy with BEAM, in patients who received an allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell from HLA-identical siblings. To test this hypothesis, we retrospectively studied 11 consecutive patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma who received BEAM/Rituximab at the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. We attempted to match these patients by age, donor-recipient gender, and donor-recipient CMV reactivity to a historical control of 44 patients with lymphoma, who received BEAM alone as a conditioning regimen, without the Rituximab. Tacrolimus and methotrexate were used for GVHD prophylaxis in both groups. A total of 10 patients in the study group, could be matched with 19 patients in the control group and were included in the final analysis. The outcome of the 2 groups is shown below: Rituximab-Study Group Control Group -value P No. of patients 10 19 Median age 41 44 0.4     (range) (19–55) (19–60) Patient-Donor sex-matched 9(82%) 18(95%) 0.6 Median # CD34 + cells infused (106/kg) 5.1 4.73 0.1 Patient or Donor CMV+ 9(82%) 18(95%) 0.6 Patient and Donor CMV − 1(10%) 1(5%) Median # prior chemoregimens 3 3 0.9     range (1–8) (1–9) Median follow-up 17 38     range (8–48) (27–77) Acute GVHD 2–4 (n,%) 5(50%) 7(37%) 0.5 Acute GVHD 3–4 (n,%) 3(30%) 5(26%) 0.6 Chronic GVHD (n, % cumulative incidence) 8 (90% + 15) 10 (53% + 12 0.01 Our data suggest that the described protective effect of Rituximab against GVHD in mouse models or in the setting of non-myeloablative allogeneic transplantation, may be overcome by the BEAM. This more intense conditioning regimen may induce more GVHD by enhancing T-cell cytokines release and by causing more gastrointestinal toxicity, thus allowing for a greater antigen presentation.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1140-1140
Author(s):  
Marie Detrait ◽  
Guy Boivin ◽  
Robert Delage ◽  
Claire Béliveau ◽  
Annie-Claude Labbé ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1140 Poster Board I-162 Introduction Cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains the most significant viral pathogen following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Pre-emptive therapy has now become the most commonly used strategy to prevent CMV disease. However, the use of a very effective anti-viral agent could theoretically minimize the risk of disease caused by CMV and other herpesviridae as well as abrogate prospective surveillance after allogeneic transplant. Valacyclovir, the L-valyl ester oral pro-drug of acyclovir, has excellent bioavailability, resulting in high plasma exposures similar to those following IV acyclovir administration. This property confers to valacyclovir antiviral activity against CMV and other herpesviridae. We hypothesized that universal prophylaxis with valacyclovir until day +100 after allogeneic transplant in recipients at high risk of CMV reactivation would lead to a decreased incidence of CMV viremia. Patients and methods Between 2003 and 2005, we conducted a prospective, randomized study in two allogeneic transplant centers in the Province of Quebec, Canada. Eligibility criteria included therapy with allogeneic blood or marrow transplantation, recipient CMV seropositivity, ability to follow protocol and give informed consent. One group was randomized to receive high dose acyclovir (500 mg/m2 iv TID from day -1 till oral intake was resumed followed by valacyclovir 2000 mg QID until day +100 after transplant (n=32), while the control group was followed using a PCR-based (Cobas system, Amplicor Monitor CMV test, Roche) preemptive approach (n=23). Valacyclovir doses were adjusted according to renal function. In addition, weekly specimens, from before initiation of conditioning regimen until day +100, were also collected in both groups of patients in order to compare incidences of other herpes viruses viremia (HSV, EBV) by real-time PCR. All patients with a positive CMV viremia were immediately treated with ganciclovir 5 mg/kg BID until disappearance of positive signal (minimum of 2 weeks) followed by 2 additional weeks. Recurrences were treated as inititial episodes. Primary end point was incidence of CMV viremia by day +100. Results Both groups of patients were similar regarding age, type of transplant (sibling vs unrelated donor), HLA compatibility, conditioning regimen (myeloablative vs reduced intensity), GVHD prophylaxis, graft nature and content and acute or chronic GVHD incidence. Valacyclovir was highly effective to reduce the incidence of CMV viremia. In the Valacyclovir group, CMV viremia occurred in 6 patients (6/31;19%) compared to 12 (12/23;63%) in the control group. Cox regression demonstrates a protective effect with valacyclovir (HR, 0.28; 95% CI: 0.10-0.74; p=0.01). Time to CMV viremia was identical in both groups (day +39 vs +36); however, the median viral load was lower in the valacyclovir group (748 vs 8043) although this difference did not reach statistical difference. Similar to CMV, both incidences of EBV and HSV viremia were significantly lower in the valacyclovir group (EBV: 4% vs 28%, p=0.005; HSV: 4% vs 30%, p=0.002). Day +100 mortality and at last follow-up are similar in both groups. Valacyclovir use was safe and well tolerated by most allogeneic transplant recipients but required frequent dose modification according to creatinine level. Conclusions Valacyclovir prophylaxis until day +100 is effective to prevent CMV, HSV and EBV reactivation after allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation. Further studies in larger numbers of patients are needed to precise the optimal use of valacyclovir in this patient population. Disclosures Off Label Use: Valacyclovir was used to prevent CMV reactivation following allogeneic transplantation under an experimental protocol approved by our IRB.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 16508-16508
Author(s):  
M. P. Escalon ◽  
D. L. Pereira ◽  
E. S. Santos ◽  
M. Goodman ◽  
J. J. Byrnes ◽  
...  

16508 Purpose: High-dose chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation has become the standard of care for chemosensitive relapsed Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma. Multiple conditioning regimens including CBV, BEAM, and BEAC have been used in the past with success. Limitations on the supply of carmustine have made it important to find other effective conditioning regimens. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the use of intravenous Busulfan and Cyclophosphamide (IV Bu/Cy) as a conditioning regimen for autologous stem cell transplantation in Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma patients. Patients were given Busulfan 3.2 mg/kg total intravenously on days -7 to -4 (either once daily or in 2 or 4 divided doses) followed by Cyclophosphamide 120 mg/kg intravenously on days -2 and -1. Results: Forty-four patients, ages 20 to 68 years (median 50) were treated from January 2000 to April 2005. Most patients had diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n = 29). Of the remaining patients, 8 had follicular lymphoma, 4 had mantle cell lymphoma and 3 had peripheral T-cell lymphoma. At the time of transplant, 27 patients had attained a complete response (CR or CRu) to salvage chemotherapy, 13 patients had achieved a partial response, and 4 had stable disease. The patients received a median of 3.0 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg (range 1.3–16.6 × 106). There were 4 treatment-related deaths by day 100: 1 from sepsis, 1 from pneumonia, and 2 from veno-occlusive disease (VOD). With a median follow-up of 42 months, 3-year Kaplan-Meier estimates of event free and overall survival for the entire cohort were 44% and 45%. For the patients that attained a CR or CRu prior to transplant, the EFS and OS were 42% and 53%, respectively. Conclusions: IV Bu/Cy is a safe and effective conditioning regimen. Due to the incidence of VOD, this regimen should be used with caution in patients with pre-existing hepatic dysfunction. Overall, our outcomes are comparable to that of other published regimens. Further investigation of Busulfan with Cyclophosphamide or with other chemotherapy combinations is warranted. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5781-5781
Author(s):  
Feifei Sun ◽  
Xiaosheng Fang ◽  
Jiang Yujie ◽  
Xiaohui Sui ◽  
Xin Liu ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective: Retrospectively analysing the outcome of additional medium-dose etoposide (VP-16 30mg/kg) in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Methods: From 2010.10.1 to 2018.6.30, 53 ALL patients received allo-HSCT in Shandong provincial hospital. 20 conditioning with medium-dose VP-16 (15 in CR , 5 in refractory and/or relapse disease) (VP-16 group), 33 conditioning without medium-dose VP-16 (32 in CR and 1 in refractory and/or relapse disease) (control group) . The basic conditions of the primary disease, treatment-related toxicity, leukemia-free survival (LFS), overall survival (OS), graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and relapse-free survival (GRFS), non-relapse mortality (NRM), relapse incidence (RI), GVHD and so on were compared between the two groups. Results: The VP-16 group included more R/R(refractory and/or relapse disease) patients and was associated with improved 3-year-LFS (70.7% vs. 56.5%, p= 0.565) and 3-year-OS (68% vs. 59.4%, p=0.825), although there was no statistical difference. Moreover, the additional of VP-16 lead to reduced incidence of aGVHD (II,III,IV) (10% vs. 30.7%, p=0.146) and cGVHD (9.1% vs 24%, p=0.25), resulting in improved GRFS (63.6% vs. 48.7%, P=0.343). RI was similar between the two group (29.3% vs 27.2%, p=0.76). Meanwhile, the addition of VP-16 enhanced the intensity of conditioning regimen, its NRM was relatively lower than control group (0% vs. 20.2%, P=0.371). Conclusion: The intensified conditioning regimen with medium-dose VP-16 did not increase NRM and GVHD, with tendency to increase OS and LFS, may become an effective pre-treatment scheme in allo-HSCT for ALL. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Eko A. Pangarsa ◽  
Ridho M. Naibaho ◽  
Vina Yunarvika ◽  
Budi Setiawan ◽  
Damai Santosa ◽  
...  

Up to 20–40% of patients with Hodgkin’s lymphoma will eventually relapse after treatment, among which early relapse confers a poor outcome. With salvage chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), the long-term remission rate is 30%. We report our experience of using a modified-BEAM conditioning regimen without BCNU consisting of etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan (EAM) in a patient with relapsed Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Before transplantation, the patient achieved second complete remission (CR2) using brentuximab vedotin and ESHAP (BR-ESHAP) chemotherapy. The ASCT went well without significant complications. This case demonstrated the considerable efficacy of EAM protocol as a conditioning regimen in terms of sufficient ablative capabilities, and the patient showed a successful hematopoietic engraftment. Although durability of the disease-free survival needs further observation, it had nearly 18 months of complete remission and the patient was in good performance status at the time of writing this manuscript.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4522-4522
Author(s):  
Silvia Park ◽  
Jung Yong Hong ◽  
Moon Ki Choi ◽  
Young Saing Kim ◽  
Ji Yun Lee ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4522 Introduction: BuCy has been regarded as a standard myeloablative regimen for allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). However, given the concern regarding the use of two alkylating agents which potentially cause unwished life-threatening adverse effects, new myeloablative regimens including FluBu4 have been introduced. And there has been several reports suggesting that FluBu may provide more effective control of hematologic malignancy with less toxicity than BuCy. Methods: Between Apr 1996 and June 2012, 111 patients received allo-SCT conditioned with BuCy2 or BuCy4, and 67 patients received FluBu4 conditioning in Samsung Meidcal Center. After excluding 31 patients who used oral busulfan in BuCy regimen, we retrospectively compared clinical outcome between 80 BuCy patients and 67 FluBu4 patients. Results: The median age at allo-SCT was younger in BuCy group compared to FluBu4 group (BuCy=36.5 years; FluBu4=46 years). AML was the most common disease comprising 45% of BuCy and 62.7% of FluBu4, and sibling donor was predominant in both groups (BuCy=71.3%; FluBu4=80.6%, p=0.189). Regarding the stem cell source, all FluBu4 patients received allo-SCT with peripheral blood whereas 35% of BuCy patients underwent allo-SCT with BM source (p<0.001), reflecting changes in institutional strategy for allo-SCT, BuCy to FluBu4 as conditioning regimen and BM to PB as a source of SCT. After allo-SCT, engraftment days of neutrophil and platelet were not different by conditioning regimen. Veno-occlusive disease (VOD) was more frequently observed in BuCy regimen (16.3%) compared to FluBu4 (7.5%) although it did not reach statistical significance (p=0.106). The incidence of acute GVHD (aGVHD) was similar in both groups with a 23.8% and a 22.4% of incidence in BuCy and FluBu4 regimen, respectively. In regard to chronic GVHD, FluBu4 rather than BuCy patients showed higher incidence of chronic GVHD (cGVHD) with statistical significance (BuCy=60%; FluBu4=77.4%, p=0.03). With median follow up period of 55.9 months, 4 year OS was 53.6% in BuCy group and 46.3% in FluBu4 group. Leukemia free survival (LFS) at 4 year were 61.2% and 71.8% in BuCy and FluBu4 patients, and the survival curves of the two conditioning groups did not show significant difference in OS and LFS (OS, p=0.2992; RFS, p=0.2307). In multivariate analysis, cGVHD showed survival benefit for OS (p<0.001, HR=0,313) and RFS (P<0.001, HR=0.282) whereas sex, age, donor type, source of SCT, and conditioning regimen did not attain significant influence on OS and LFS. Conclusion: Although substantial limitations regarding heterogeneous distribution of diseases and significant differences in the source of the SCT according to each conditioning group preclude direct comparison between regimens, the result of this study suggested that it is not clear that FluBu4 offered a significant advantage over the BuCy as a conditioning regimen for allo SCT. Disclosures: Jang: Alexion Pharmaceutical Company: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 5856-5856
Author(s):  
Sainath Bhethanabhotla ◽  
Ranjit Kumar Sahoo ◽  
Lalit Kumar ◽  
Atul Sharma ◽  
Sameer Bakhshi

Abstract Conditioning regimens are an important issue determining the outcome of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Altering the administration order of Busulphan (Bu) and Cyclophosphamide (Cy) during conditioning from conventional method of administering Bu followed by Cy had resulted in an improved toxicity profile in few animal and subsequent human studies. However the data substantiating this approach is limited. We retrospectively analyzed all consecutive patients receiving allogeneic stem cell transplant (Allo SCT) with myeloablative conditioning from 2009 to 2013. A total of 40 patient received Allo SCT of which 18 patient received Bu-Cy and 22 patients received Cy-Bu conditioning regimen. The Bu–Cy conditioning regimen consisted of i.v. Bu 0.8 mg/kg administered every 6 h (16 doses) on days −7 to −4, followed by i.v. Cy 60 mg/kg on days −3 and −2. Patients with the Cy–Bu regimen received i.v. Cy 60 mg/kg on days −7 and −6; followed by i.v. Bu 0.8 mg/kg administered every 6 hr (16 doses) on days −5 to −2. GVHD prophylaxis was given with Cyclosporine A and methotrexate. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0 (CTCAE) was used for assessment of toxicity. The diagnosis of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) was based on modified Seattle criteria. Pre-transplant characteristics were comparable in the two cohorts (Table 1a and 1b). Time to platelet engraftment was earlier in the Cy-Bu cohort (21 days vs. 16 days; P=0.008) (Table 2).Treatment related side effects were similar in both the groups except hepatotoxicity which was higher in Bu-Cy as compared to Cy-Bu group (10 (55.16%) vs. 3 (13.64%); p=0.03). There was no significant difference in treatment related mortality (TRM) at day 100; however there was trend towards higher TRM at day 30 in Bu-Cy group (3 vs. none; p=0.083).There was no difference in aGVHD incidence, grade or stage of organ involved between the 2 groups. As in previous studies hepatotoxicity in the present analysis was found to be less in patients who received Cy-Bu as the conditioning regimen and there was earlier platelet engraftment in this group. These findings suggest Cy-Bu has better toxicity profile than conventional Bu-Cy regimen. However further prospective studies are required to confirm these findings. Table 1a. Baseline Characteristics Patient Characteristics Bu-Cy (n=18) Cy-Bu (n=22) P value Sex Male 15 16 0.424 Age (in yrs) Median (Range) 17 (1-50) 16 (1-48) ≤18 9 13 ≥18 9 9 Underlying Disease AML 14 12 0.415 ALL 3 4 CML 1 3 MDS 0 2 Primary Myelofibrosis 0 1 Pre-transplant Remission Status CR 11 11 0.482 Performance status (ECOG) 0 4 3 0.314 1 9 16 HSCT Comorbidity Index 0 14 15 0.341 1 1 5 2 2 2 3 1 0 Table1b. Baseline Characteristics Transplant characteristics Bu-Cy Cy-Bu P value Time from diagnosis to Transplant Mean (days) + SD 548.1 675 0.567 HLA Matching HLA identical (6/6) 17 21 0.884 HLA mismatch (5/6) 1 1 Donor Matched Sibling 17 16 0.884 UCB 1 1 Donor Age Median(Range) 20 (0-47) 16 (0-50) 0.781 Donor Sex Male 5 14 0.034 Female 12 8 Sex mismatch 12 13 0.458 Female Donor in Male patient 11 7 0.064 Harvest Source Peripheral Blood (PB) 15 21 0.269 Bone Marrow (BM) 2 0 Cord Blood (UCB) 1 1 CD 34 Count(x106 cells/kg) Mean+SD 5.12+2.60 5.66+2.37 0.499 CD 3 Count(x107 cells/kg) Mean 25.5 17.5 0.200 Table 2 Results Outcome Bu-Cy Cy-Bu P ANC recovery 14 (11-30) 11 (8-32) 0.119 Platelet recovery 21 (17-44) 16 (11-27) 0.008 Platelets transfused 6 (1-10) 4 (1-15) 0.166 Days of GCSF 18 (12-36) 14 (9-37) 0.126 D100 Complete Donor Chimerism 9 (90%) 12(85.71%) 1.000 Transplant Response 15/17 (88.24%) 19/22 (86.36%) 1.000 Days of Antimicrobial use 13 (0-34) 13 (0-36) 0.83 Hepatotoxicity (grade3-4) 10/18 (55.56%) 3/22 (13.64%) 0.030 Nephrotoxicity (grade3-4) 3/18 (16.67%) 1/22 (4.55%) 0.204 Mucositis (grade3-4) 6/18 (33.33%) 6/22 (27.27%) 0.677 Any Grade 3-4 toxicity 10/18 (55.56%) 9/22 (40.91%) 0.356 D30 TRM 3 (16.67%) 0 0.083 D100 TRM 4 (22.22%) 2 (10%) 0.395 Follow up 28.67 months 7.6 months Acute GVHD 3/18 (16.67%) 5/22 (22.73%) 0.709 Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document