Reduction of BCR-ABL Transcript Levels at 6, 12, and 18 Months (mo) Correlates with Long-Term Outcomes on Imatinib (IM) at 72 Mo: An Analysis from the International Randomized Study of Interferon versus STI571 (IRIS) in Patients (pts) with Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML-CP)

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 334-334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy P Hughes ◽  
Andreas Hochhaus ◽  
Susan Branford ◽  
Martin C Müller ◽  
Letizia Foroni ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: An exploratory endpoint of the IRIS trial was measurement of BCR-ABL transcripts over time and its correlation with long-term outcomes. BCR-ABL measured by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was required per protocol only after achievement of a complete cytogenetic response (CCyR). However, preplanned substudies occurred at sites in Germany and Australia who conducted PCR measurements on pts at intervals from the start of treatment independent of cytogenetic response (CyR). Additionally, other IRIS investigators contributed non-protocol specified molecular assessments. This first entire PCR dataset from IRIS assesses the prognostic value of molecular response (MR) at specific time points. Methods: 553 pts were enrolled onto the IM arm of IRIS; of these, 476 pts with at least one PCR measurement form the basis for this analysis. A major molecular response (MMR) is defined as the ratio of BCR-ABL/control gene (BAC) of ≤0.1%. Analyses were conducted at 6, 12 and 18 mo relating BAC percent reduction to event free survival (EFS), where events were defined as death during study treatment, loss of complete hematologic response, loss of Major CyR (MCyR), progression to accelerated phase (AP) or blast crisis (BC), or an increasing white blood cell count to > 20 × 109/L. Results: Among pts receiving first line IM for CML-CP, MMR was observed in 13% of samples available for study at 3 mo, 33% at 6 mo, 50% at 12 mo, 65% at 18 mo, 75% at 48 mo, 85% at 60 mo, and 86% at 72 mo. The degree of molecular response in pts who achieved CCyR is described in Table 1. This exploratory analysis demonstrates close correlation between CCyR and BAC ≤1% at 6 months and beyond. Table 1. Correlation of CCyR with molecular response at 3, 6, 12 and 18 mo. Time point Pts with CCyR and PCR samples available (n) CCyR and ≤0.1% BAC [MMR], n (%) CCyR and ≤1% BAC, n (%) 3 mo 51 17 (33%) 38 (75%) 6 mo 127 61 (48%) 114 (90%) 12 mo 177 110 (62%) 168 (95%) 18 mo 163 127 (78%) 154 (94%) At 6 mo, half of the pts with BAC >10% who also had a cytogenetic assessment at the same time had at least a partial cytogenetic response (PCyR) with an EFS of 91% at 72 mo, and 64% of these pts achieved MMR later. The other half of the pts with >10% BAC who did not have a PCyR at 6 mo had an EFS of 43%, and 31% later achieved MMR. A separate landmark analysis by CyR status alone showed EFS rates at 72 mo of 92% for pts in CCyR, 86% for pts in PCyR, 60% for Minor/Minimal CyR and 49% for No CyR. At 12 mo, pts with BAC ≤ 1% had excellent long term outcomes (72 month EFS of >90%, >95% without progression to AP/BC). Those pts with BAC > 1–≤ 10% (n = 36) had a 67% EFS, and 44% later achieved an MMR. These molecular analyses compare similarly to cytogenetic analyses alone (Baccarani et al; ASH 2006), with 60 mo EFS of 93% for pts in CCyR, 78% for pts in PCyR and 61% for pts without PCyR At 18 mo, pts with MMR could be statistically distinguished from pts with BAC >0.1–≤ 1%; EFS was 98% versus 89%, p=0.0137 (with 6 events in each group). The rate without AP/BC at 72 mo was not significantly different (with only 2 events in the >0.1 – ≤ 1% group). Baccarani et al (ASH 2006) reported an EFS at 60 mo of 96% for pts in CCyR, 80% for pts in PcyR and 69% for pts without PCyR. Table 2: Long-term outcomes (estimated rates at 72 mo) by MR levels at 6, 12 and 18 mo. BCR-ABL categories ≤0.1% (MMR) >0.1 −≤1% >1 −≤10% >10% *P=.0137. None of the other comparisons between MMR and > 0.1–≤1% BAC were statistically significant. 6 mo landmark N=86 N=89 N=44 N=39 EFS rate at 72 mo 90% 94% 88% 55% Without AP/BC at 72 mo 96% 100% 95% 74% 12 mo landmark N=153 N=90 N=36 N=26 EFS rate at 72 mo 94% 93% 67% 46% Without AP/BC at 72 mo 100% 96% 83% 76% 18 mo landmark N=164 N=48 N=25 N=16 EFS rate at 72 mo 98%* 89%* 67% 47% Without AP/BC at 72 mo 100% 96% 83% 82% Conclusion: In pts on first-line IM, MMR rates increase over time, and in pts who achieved an MMR at any time point progression is rare. Achievement of a CCyR correlated well with BAC of ≤1% from 6 mo onwards. Exploratory molecular analyses show pts with BAC >10% at 6 mo have EFS rates distinguishable by their cytogenetic status. At 12 mo, pts with a BAC > 1% or without CCyR, fare more poorly than those with BAC ≤ 1% or those in CCyR. At 18 mo pts with BAC ≤ 1% have excellent long term outcomes, with the best outcomes seen in those with BAC ≤ 0.1%. Molecular and cytogenetic evaluations are recommended until at least CCyR is achieved, with molecular assessments measured indefinitely thereafter.

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 3775-3775 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soo-Young Choi ◽  
Sung-Eun Lee ◽  
Soo-Hyun Kim ◽  
Eun-Jung Jang ◽  
Jin-hwa Lee ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3775 Background. In chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), achievement of optimal responses by time point has improved long-term outcomes. In contrast, several clinical studies investigating the clinical implications of suboptimal response showed that patients with suboptimal responses tend to have poor long-term outcomes. In IRIS study, patients who achieved major molecular response (MMR) at 18 months had event-free survival (EFS) benefit, compared to those who achieved complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) without MMR. However, the best treatment for these patients is still not confirmed. By the previous studies, sustaining standard-dose of imatinib (IM) is expected to yield less than 20 percent of additive MMR. In this prospective study, we investigated whether switching to nilotinib (NIL) or high-dose IM may be more effective for patients with suboptimal molecular response to IM as first-line therapy. Methods. Early chronic phase (CP) CML patients who have achieved CCyR but no MMR after at least 18 months and up to 24 months (≤ 18 to ≥24 months) on first-line IM therapy at a daily dose of 400 mg were enrolled in this clinical trial, and informed consents were obtained from all patients. In NIL arm, patients received oral dose of 400 mg BID (800 mg/day) and in high-dose IM arm, patients received 800 mg/day administrated as 400 mg BID. Primary endpoint is to evaluate the cumulative MMR rates by 12 months, and secondary endpoints are to evaluate the cumulative MMR, MR4.0 and undetectable molecular residual disease (UMRD) rates during further 24 month follow-up. Safety profiles will also be assessed. Patients showing lack of response (lack of complete hematologic response (CHR) at 6 months, increasing WBC, no major cytogenetic response (MCyR) at 24 months), loss of response (loss of CHR or MCyR) or severe intolerance to treatment were allowed to crossover to the alternative treatment. Results. With a data cut-off date of 10 Jul 2012, a total of 43 patients were randomized into NIL arm (n = 22) or high-dose IM arm (n = 21). With a median follow-up of 15 months (range, 1–36), all patients have maintained CCyR without progression to advanced disease, and progressive decrease in BCR-ABL1 transcript levels was observed in all patients. Cumulative incidence (CI) of MMR by 12 months showed no significant difference between NIL arm and high-dose IM arm (37.8 ± 11.9% vs 34.8 ± 10.6%, P = 0.789). In NIL arm, 3 in 22 (14%) and 2 in 22 (9%) patients achieved MR4.0 and UMRD, respectively, and in high-dose IM arm, 1 in 21 (5%) patients achieved MR4.0. Overall, the patients treated with high-dose IM showed toxicities more frequently, such as fatigue, dyspnea and decreased phosphate. In addition, 10 patients in high-dose IM arm have cross-over to NIL treatment due to lack of response (n=9) and intolerance (n=1), and the median duration of NIL treatment was 14 months (range, 7–26 months). Among them, 5 (50%) patients have achieved MMR with a median NIL treatment duration of 12 months (range, 3–18). Conclusions. These results demonstrate that early switching to NIL or dose escalation of IM could be recommended, considering the results of standard dose of IM in suboptimal molecular responders. When the tolerability of treatment was considered for switching to NIL or high-dose IM, NIL may be preferred. Through further clinical investigation on a large patient population and longer period observation, the efficacy and safety of early intervention of suboptimal molecular response using NIL or dose escalation of IM will be needed. Updated data with longer follow-up duration will be presented in the meeting. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 2138-2138
Author(s):  
Michele Baccarani ◽  
Francois Guilhot ◽  
Richard A. Larson ◽  
Stephen G. O’Brien ◽  
Brian J. Druker ◽  
...  

Abstract Long term data is now available from the International Randomized Study of Interferon vs. STI571 (IRIS). We performed landmark analyses for pts on imatinib (IM) at 12 and 18 months (mos) (n=509 and n=480 respectively) and stratified for CCyR (Ph+ 0%), PCyR (Ph+ >0–35%) or No MCyR (Ph+ >35%) at both timepoints. Progression-free survival (PFS) included all progressions to accelerated phase or blast crisis during treatment with IM, whereas event-free survival (EFS) also included any loss of MCyR/CHR, increase in WBC and CML-unrelated deaths on treatment as events. Overall survival (OS) considered all deaths including those after discontinuation of IM and irrespective of whether pts went on to transplant. Outcomes in IM pts by cytogenetic response at 12 and 18 mos Estimated long-term outcomes at 60 mos (%) CcyR CcyR EFS PFS OS by 30 mos (%) by 60 mos (%) 12 mos landmark CCyR N = 350 93 97 95 – – PCyR N = 86 78 93 90 57 64 No MCyR N = 73 61 81 80 21 36 18 mos landmark CCyR N = 358 96 99 97 – – PCyR N = 66 80 90 90 38 50 No MCyR N = 56 69 83 82 11 27 Although the level of cytogenetic response was predictive for long-term outcomes, PFS and OS were not statistically significantly different between 12-mos CCyR and PCyR. Note that 64% of PCyR pts and 36% of pts without MCyR at 12 mos subsequently achieved CCyR. Using the 18-mos landmark, 50% of PCyR pts and 27% of pts without MCyR achieved CCyR at a later time. Long-term outcomes were evaluated based on available BCR-ABL transcript levels in pts with CCyR. A 3-log reduction from standardized baseline value in untreated pts was defined as a major molecular response (MMR). No pts who achieved both CCyR and MMR at 12 or 18 mos progressed to AP/BC by 60 mos. Approximately 5% of pts with CCyR but no MMR at 12 mos (p=0.007) and only 2% of CCyR pts without MMR at 18 mos (p=0.11) subsequently progressed. Of approximately 25% of CCyR pts with available PCR analysis who did not achieve MMR at 18 mos, about half did achieve MMR at a later time and their estimated EFS rate at 60 mths was 91%. At 60 mos, 69% of patients randomized to IM remained on treatment. Achievement of CCyR and MMR by 12 and 18 mos after start of IM in newly diagnosed CML-CP are predictive for favorable long-term outcomes. About 50% of pts in PCyR or CCyR at these time points eventually achieve CCyR and MMR, respectively, on continued IM treatment. The ability to identify patients who may be late responders should be further studied.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1675-1675 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Saglio ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Neil Shah ◽  
Elias J. Jabbour ◽  
Alfonso Quintas-Cardama ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1675 Background: In the randomized phase 3 DASISION trial in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed CML-CP, dasatinib 100 mg once daily (QD) demonstrated improved efficacy over imatinib 400 mg QD and an acceptable tolerability profile (NEJM 2010 362 2260). At 3 years (y) pts achieved high rates of progression free survival (PFS) (91% both arms) and overall survival (OS) (94%, dasatinib; 93%, imatinib). Compared with pts receiving imatinib, pts receiving dasatinib achieved higher rates of cytogenetic and molecular responses, shorter time to responses, and fewer transformations to accelerated/blast phase (AP/BP) (JCO 2012 30 6504). Marin et al reported that BCR-ABL levels at 3 and 6 months (mo) with imatinib were significantly correlated with 8-y PFS and OS (JCO 2012 30 232), and Hanfstein et al proposed BCR-ABL levels of 10% at 3 mo and 1% at 6 mo as clinically important landmarks correlated with 5-y PFS and OS (Leukemia 2012 Epub). The aim of this exploratory analysis was to investigate the impact of early molecular and cytogenetic response on the outcome of pts enrolled in the DASISION trial. Methods: Pts with CML-CP were randomized to receive dasatinib 100 mg QD (n=259) or imatinib 400 mg QD (n=260). Methods have been previously reported (NEJM 2010 362 2260). PFS and OS rates were obtained from Kaplan-Meier estimates. Qualifying events for PFS included: increasing white blood cells, loss of complete hematologic response or major cytogenetic response, transformation to AP/BP, or death. Results: More dasatinib v imatinib pts achieved a partial cytogenetic response (PCyR) or complete CyR (CCyR) at 3 mo (81% v 67%) and at 6 mo (91% v 81%). Significantly higher rates of 3-y PFS were observed in pts with PCyR/CCyR at 3 mo (P<.0001, P=.0026 for dasatinib, imatinib) or at 6 mo (P=.0172, <.0001). Of pts with 3-mo molecular analyses (235 dasatinib, 239 imatinib), more pts treated with dasatinib achieved BCR-ABL ≤10% (84% v 64%) or ≤1% (48% v 13%). Of pts with 6-mo molecular analyses (236 dasatinib, 236 imatinib), more pts treated with dasatinib achieved BCR-ABL ≤10% (89% v 83%) or ≤1% (70% v 50%). Pts with BCR-ABL ≤10% at 3 mo had significantly better 3-y PFS (dasatinib: 93.1% v 68.2%, P=.0003; imatinib: 95.9% v 75.3%, P<.0001) and OS (dasatinib: 95.9% v 85.9%, P=.0348; imatinib: 96.0% v 88.0%, P=.0036). Pts with BCR-ABL ≤1% at 6 mo had significantly better PFS (dasatinib: 94.9% v 84.6%, P=.0020; imatinib: 97.4% v 83.8%, P=.0016) and with imatinib significantly better OS (97.4% v 93.6%, P=.0215). The difference between BCR-ABL ≤1% v >1–10% at 6 mo was not significant. Pts with BCR-ABL ≤10% and ≤1% at 3 and 6 mo had a lower risk of transformation within 3 y (Table); transformation was associated with a high risk of death (overall 50% mortality within 7 mo). In addition, pts receiving imatinib who had a poor response at 3 mo (BCR-ABL >10%) who achieved ≤10% at 6 mo still had a higher risk of transformation in comparison with those who achieved an initial deeper response at 3 mo. However, no patient on dasatinib with BCR-ABL >10% at 3 mo and ≤10% at 6 mo transformed. Conclusions: More pts treated with dasatinib achieved a faster, deeper cytogenetic and molecular response, which was associated with better 3-y outcomes and lower risk of transformation to AP/BP. The clinical importance of achieving deeper levels of cytogenetic response (CCyR) at 6 mo will be presented. Early response landmarks may identify pts at higher risk for transformation, poor outcome, and those who may benefit from alternate treatments to improve responses and thereby minimize exposure to risk over time. More pts starting on imatinib compared with dasatinib transformed to AP/BP than those receiving dasatinib. These exploratory data highlight the clinical importance of a fast and deep response, with the potential to reduce the risk of transformation and improve long-term outcomes. OS data at 3 y in DASISION are immature and longer-term follow up is planned. Disclosures: Saglio: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Kantarjian:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Shah:Novartis: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding. Jabbour:Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy. Quintas-Cardama:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Steegmann:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Boqué:Novartis: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Chuah:Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Pavlovsky:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Mayer:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Ukropec:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment. Wildgust:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hochhaus:Pfizer, ARIAD, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer, ARIAD, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Novartis: Consultancy.


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 21-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francois Guilhot

IM has proven to be superior to IFN+Ara-C for newly diagnosed pts with CML-CP (O’Brien et al, NEJM, 2003). At 30-months of follow-up, 79% of pts randomized to IM remain on IM with 83% of them now treated for > 24 months. Therefore, this analysis is focused on first-line IM pts (n=553). Evaluation included complete hematologic response (CHR), major/complete cytogenetic response (MCyR/CCyR), major molecular response (≥3 log reduction in BCR-ABL/BCR vs. pooled diagnostic samples) time to progression (TTP) - defined as loss of CHR/MCyR or evolution to accelerated phase/blast crisis [AP/BC] or death, time to AP/BC, and overall survival. Median follow-up for first-line IM pts is 31.1. Summary of results are the following: 1st-line imatinib * 95% CI Best observed CHR/MCyR/CCyR (%) 95/87/79 Estimated major molecular response at 12 mos. (%) 40 Estimated cumulative MCyR % at 30 mos. 90 Estimated cumulative CCyR % at 30 mos. 82 Estimated % free of progression at 30 mos. 88 (85–91)* Estimated % free of AP/BC at 30 mos. 95 (93–97)* Estimated % survival at 30 mos. 95 (93–97)* The additional follow-up confirmed durable responses with first-line therapy while also demonstrating the effect of cytogenetic response on long-term outcomes. The estimated rate of confirmed responders remaining in response after achieving a CCyR at 30 months is >92%. Similarly, the estimated rate of patients still in response at 30 months after achieving either a MCyR or CHR is also >92% for both groups. Only 2% of pts with a confirmed loss of MCyR and 1% of the pts with a confirmed loss of CCyR subsequently progressed to AP/BC. Of these pts, 3 of 5 benefited from a dose increase to 600 or 800 mg of IM, while only 1 of 7 pts with a confirmed loss subsequently achieved a MCyR without a dose escalation. A total of 75 pts received a marrow transplant (BMT) after discontinuation from the study; 30 in the IM arm (2 after crossover from IFN) and 45 pts who were randomized to IFN (21 after crossover to IM). There was no difference in survival after BMT between pts who received first-line IM treatment (8 deaths, 1 after crossover) and pts who had received IFN+Ara–C (7 deaths) or IFN+Ara–C followed by IM (7 deaths) (p=0.78). The estimated survival at 12 months after BMT is 70%, 75%, and 68% respectively in the three groups. A landmark analysis showed that for 407 pts who achieved MCyR within 6 months, their estimated rate free of AP/BC at 30 months is 97% vs. 89% for the 124 pts who did not achieve this level of response at 6 months (p<0.001). Additionally, the estimated survival at 30 months for the same pts is 97% vs. 92% (p=0.0162). The achievement of a major molecular response at 12 months was also associated with improved progression-free survival. For patients who had achieved CCyR and a reduction in BCR-ABL transcript level ≥ 3 log at 12 months, the probability of remaining progression free was 100% at 30 months compared to 93% for such patients with reduction in BCR-ABL transcript level < 3 log and 82% for patients who were not in CCyR at 12 months (p<0.0001). These results will be further updated using a data cut-off of 31-July-04 to reflect additional 12-months of data (i.e., 42-month follow-up).


Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 186-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen G O’Brien ◽  
François Guilhot ◽  
John M Goldman ◽  
Andreas Hochhaus ◽  
Timothy P Hughes ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Based on results from the IRIS trial, IM is the standard of care for pts with newly diagnosed CML-CP. This report presents the 7 yr data update of IRIS to assess long term outcome, response rate, and safety in pts on primary IM therapy. Methods: 553 pts were randomly assigned to IM and evaluated for hematologic, cytogenetic and molecular responses, discontinuations/cross-over reasons, event-free survival (EFS), progression to accelerated-phase (AP) or blast crisis (BC) and OS. Events for EFS were defined as the first occurrence of any of the following during treatment: death from any cause, progression to AP/BC, loss of a complete hematologic response or major cytogenetic response (MCyR), or an increasing white blood cell count to &gt; 20 × 109/L. After discontinuation of study treatment, pts were followed only for OS. Results: At 7 yrs, the estimated EFS was 81%, freedom from progression (FFP) to AP/ BC was 93%, and the estimated OS was 86%. The best observed rates for MCyR and complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) were 89% and 82%, respectively. A total of 317 (57%) of all randomized pts remained on IM per protocol and were in CCyR. The estimated rates of progression to AP/BC from yrs 1 through 7 are 1.5, 2.8, 1.6, 0.9, 0.5, 0, and 0.4%, respectively, with one pt progressing to AP/BC between yrs 6 and 7. Yearly event rates are 3.3%, 7.5%, 4.8%, 1.7%, 0.8%, 0.3% and 2% (5 events occurred in the 7th yr: 3 unconfirmed loss of MCyR, 2 deaths). Of the 456 pts who achieved CCyR, 79 (17%) subsequently lost CCyR; 25 remained on IM (19 pts regained CCyR, of whom 6 responded to an increase in IM dose; 6 pts remained in MCyR without dose escalation). A total of 15 pts (3%) who achieved CCyR on IM progressed to AP/BC during study treatment, typically during the 1st year after achievement of CCyR; 3 CCyR pts progressed to AP/BC after the 2nd year. A total of 332 (60%) pts remain on IM on protocol at the 7-yr data cut-off. Reasons for discontinuation or crossover include: 5% adverse events/ safety, 15% lack of efficacy/progression, 3% bone marrow transplant, 2% death, and 15% other (protocol violation, withdrawal of consent or lack of renewal of consent, lost to follow-up, administrative) reasons. Between yrs 6 and 7, 17 pts (3%) discontinued IM for the following reasons: adverse events (n=3), death (n=2; 1 CML-related), unsatisfactory therapeutic effect (n=7; 1 progression to AP/BC, 4 unconfirmed loss of MCyR, 2 unconfirmed loss of CCyR), protocol violation (n=1), and withdrawal of consent (n=4). Molecular response (MR) assessment was required per the IRIS protocol only in pts who had achieved CCyR. However, MR was measured routinely in 98 pts treated in Australia/ New Zealand and Germany (sub-study) at baseline and every 3 mo through 72 mo, and other sites contributed assessments if available. Of the total IRIS IM cohort, 476 pts had at least one PCR measurement. MMR was defined as a ratio of BCR-ABL/control transcripts of ≤ 0.1% according to the International Scale. Table 1: MR over time: BCR-ABL/control gene transcript levels (as % of available samples) All available samples Sub-study samples Time-points (mo) n &gt;10% &gt; 1.0–≤10% &gt; 0.1–≤1.0% ≤0.1% (MMR) n ≤0.1% (MMR) 3 174 25% 39% 24% 13% 87 8% 6 258 15% 17% 35% 33% 86 28% 12 305 9% 12% 30% 50% 81 47% 18 253 6% 10% 19% 65% 70 63% 48 238 6% 9% 10% 75% 66 82% 60 273 3% 4% 8% 85% 71 90% 72 210 2% 3% 9% 86% 57 88% The MMR rates at 12 and 48 mo for all available samples are consistent with the reported rates of 53% and 80%, respectively, noted in a subset of pts with CCyR (Druker et al, NEJM, 2006) and similar to the unselected sub-study data. Additionally, MMR responses at 12 mo are similar to the recently reported TOPS trial (Cortes et al, EHA 2008). Between yr 6 and 7, serious adverse events suspected to be related to IM were reported in 9 pts, resulting in treatment discontinuation in 3 pts. No new safety issues were identified. Conclusions: Responses with IM therapy remain durable with estimated 7 yr rates of FFP to AP/BC 93%, EFS 81%, and OS 86%. Only 1 patient progressed between yrs 6 and 7. The safety profile is unchanged and confirms a favorable risk-benefit ratio in CML-CP. Long-term follow-up of pts who continue to respond to IM demonstrate an MMR rate of 85–90% at 5–6 years. These results demonstrate increasing suppression of CML over time in patients who continue to receive imatinib.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3292-3292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Branford ◽  
Dong-Wook Kim ◽  
Simona Soverini ◽  
Enrico Gottardi ◽  
Lan Beppu ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3292 Poster Board III-1 Background: Nilotinib is a potent and highly selective BCR-ABL kinase inhibitor, approved for the treatment of Philadelphia positive CML patients (pts) in CP or accelerated phase (CML-AP) who are resistant or intolerant to prior therapy including imatinib. A recent analysis demonstrated an association between BCR-ABL transcript levels at 3 months (mos) and response in pts treated with second-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors (Branford et al. Blood. 2008). This multi-center analysis was conducted to examine the association specifically between the initial molecular response to nilotinib with response and outcomes. Methods: CML-CP pts (N = 321) with imatinib resistance or intolerance were included and post-baseline BCR-ABL transcript levels were available for 294 patients. Intolerant pts also exhibited some degree of resistance to imatinib and were not eligible for the study if demonstrating major cytogenetic response (MCyR), the primary study endpoint. We aimed to determine if the initial molecular response to nilotinib could predict the response and outcome of patients with or without BCR-ABL mutations at baseline or those with imatinib resistance or intolerance. BCR-ABL transcript levels at 3 mos were used to perform a landmark analysis to assess the association between the initial molecular response and estimated probability of MCyR, major molecular response (MMR), and event-free survival (EFS) at 24 mos. Events were defined as loss of hematologic or cytogenetic response, progression to AP/BC, discontinuation due to progression or death. The analysis excludes patients who had already attained MCyR (n = 111) or MMR [BCR-ABL% (IS) ≤ 0.1%] (n = 28) or who had an event (n = 22) within the first 3 mos of therapy for each respective landmark analysis. Patients censored within the first 3 mos were also excluded. Patients were then grouped according to their level of BCR-ABL% (IS). Results: BCR-ABL% (IS) at 3 mos correlated with MCyR rates at 24 mos; pts with BCR-ABL% (IS) ≤ 10 had better probability of response compared with pts with BCR-ABL% (IS) > 10 (62% vs 35%, respectively). This difference in MCyR rate was most significant for pts with baseline mutations (60% vs 19%, P = .006) and those with imatinib resistance (63% vs 33%, P = 0.0007). A similar trend was observed for patients without baseline mutations (64% vs 47%) and imatinib intolerance (57% vs 40%). BCR-ABL% (IS) at 3 mos was highly predictive of MMR rates at 24 mos (Table). Pts with BCR-ABL% (IS) values > 0.1 - ≤ 1 had significantly higher probability (65%) of achieving MMR for all patient groups, whereas those with BCR-ABL% (IS) > 10 had estimated rates of 10% or less. The BCR-ABL% (IS) value at 3 mos was also found to correlate with EFS at 24 mos (Table). The estimated EFS rate at 24 mos was highest for pts with BCR-ABL% (IS) values of ≤ 1 at 3 mos for each patient group and ranged from 75% to 100%. Patients with BCR-ABL% (IS) values > 10 at 3 mos had the poorest outcome and the estimated EFS rates ranged from 36% for patients with baseline mutations to 57% for those without baseline mutations. Conclusion: BCR-ABL% (IS) at 3 mos predicts response and long-term outcomes of imatinib-resistant and intolerant pts regardless of baseline mutation status at 24 mos on nilotinib therapy. Rapid reduction of BCR-ABL may be important for optimal response and outcome. Pts whose BCR-ABL % (IS) levels decreased below 10% at 3 mos demonstrated a high probability of achieving MMR and MCyR at 24 mos. Pts who achieve early molecular response may also have an increased probability of improved long-term outcomes on nilotinib therapy, while pts with BCR-ABL% (IS) value > 10 at 3 mos may have poorer prognosis. Disclosures: Branford: Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding. Kim:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Wyeth: Research Funding. Haque:Novartis: Employment. Shou:Novartis: Employment. Woodman:Novartis: Employment. Kantarjian:Novartis: Research Funding. Radich:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Saglio:Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Hughes:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Advisor, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Advisor, Honoraria, Research Funding. Hochhaus:Novartis: Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2774-2774
Author(s):  
Franck E. Nicolini ◽  
Marie Balsat ◽  
Maud Lekieffre ◽  
Vincent Alcazer ◽  
Hélène Labussière-wallet ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Imatinib has indeed revolutionized the treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) since more than 15 years now, especially in CP. The first patients (pts) in this setting were treated with this compound within the IRIS phase III trial from Novartis, started in January 2000. Regular updates of the results of this study have been presented during various meetings until year 7, and academic studies have recently reported the outcomes of IM first-line CP CML pts after 66 months follow-up. However, little is known about the very long-term outcomes (>8 years) of such first-line pts and these data might be of interest while generic forms of IM will be soon launched in this setting. In this study, we aimed to look at long-term outcomes in terms of efficacy and toxicities in first-line CP CML pts treated with branded form of IM (Glivec®). Methods This is a comprehensive retrospective analysis of first-line CP CML pts treated with IM first-line 400 mg daily since diagnosis and followed in 2 university reference centers for CML between 2000 and 2015, inside or outside academic or industrial clinical trials. All living pts have given their agreement for participation in this retrospective analysis. Pts have been analyzed in intention-to-treat, CML was defined according to ELN criteria [CP, accelerated phase (AP) and blast crises (BC)], Sokal, Euro and EUTOS scores have been calculated as published. Molecular biology tests have been performed according to ELN guidelines and BCR-ABL1/ABL1 were expressed as % on the international scale and 3 ELN conversion factors have been applied successively along time according to material exchanges performed with the central European laboratory in Mannheim. Cytogenetic and molecular responses have been defined according to the ELN criteria. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the date of IM initiation until death at any time and for any reason; until progression to AP or BC at any time for progression-free survival (PFS); and until death, progression to AP or BC, failure on IM or IM treatment discontinuation for any cause including treatment-free remission (TFR), for event-free survival (EFS). The cut-off date for this analysis was the 20th of July 2,015. Results At time of analysis, 120 pts could be analyzed, with a median follow-up of 85.5 (1-194) months, 70 (58%) were males, with a median age of 55 (11-85) at IM initiation. Sokal score was high for 24(20%) pts, intermediate for 58 (49%), low for 34 (30.5%), unknown in 4 (0.5%) pts. Four (3.5%) pts had a variant Ph chromosome, 7 (6%) with additional chromosomal abnormalities, and 2 a masked Ph chromosome, 6 harbored atypical BCR-ABL1 transcripts excluded from analysis. Early molecular response (M3) was achieved in 86 (72%) pts, unreached in 20 (16%) pts, and unknown for 15 (12.5%) pts. It was predictive of Major Molecular Response (MMR) at 12 months (p=0.01, OR 5.35, 95%CI [1.3-31.94]), for MR4 rates at 24 months (p=0.03, OR 7.35 95%CI [1-328]) and for EFS (p=0.006) but not for OS and PFS in a multivariate Cox model analysis. MMR was achieved in 42% of evaluable pts at 12 months. Eutos, Euro and Sokal scores had no impact on OS, PFS and EFS. Five pts progressed to BC (1 myeloid, 4 lymphoid) within the 5 first years and died after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. The PFS rates were 97.5% at 2 years, 92% at 5 years, 88.6% at 10 and 14 years, EFS rates were 76% at 2 years, 60% at 5 years, 45% at 10 years and 21% at 14 years (figure 1), OS rates were 98% at 2 years, 95% at 5 years, 87% at 10 and 14 years. Figure 1: PFS and EFS in pts on IM first-line. (Dashed lines represent 95%CI). MR4.5 was achieved in 58 (48.5%) pts after a median of 46 (3-191) months and TFR strategy (or trial) was proposed in 28 pts (23.5%) and successful in 15 (12.5%) pts. At latest follow-up, after a median of 85.5 (4-180) months, 64 (53.5%) pts are still on IM, and 44 (37%) have switched to an alternative therapy for intolerance (17 pts, 14%) or resistance (16 pts, 13.5%, 7 with a BCR-ABL mutation) to IM and 11 for other causes (pregnancy, secondary tumors…). Overall, at latest follow-up, 10/120 pts died, 5 of CML progression and 5 from other causes. Conclusions After a very long median follow-up of more than 85 months, IM still consistently provides high rates of remission and survival, without disease progression and severe long-term toxicities. In addition, half of the pts reached the MR4.5 level, ≥2 years stable in 23.5% of the pts offering the possibility of a treatment-free strategy. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Nicolini: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Ariad Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Mahon:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; ARIAD: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Etienne:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria.


Leukemia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Timothy P. Hughes ◽  
Richard A. Larson ◽  
Dong-Wook Kim ◽  
Surapol Issaragrisil ◽  
...  

AbstractIn the ENESTnd study, with ≥10 years follow-up in patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase, nilotinib demonstrated higher cumulative molecular response rates, lower rates of disease progression and CML-related death, and increased eligibility for treatment-free remission (TFR). Cumulative 10-year rates of MMR and MR4.5 were higher with nilotinib (300 mg twice daily [BID], 77.7% and 61.0%, respectively; 400 mg BID, 79.7% and 61.2%, respectively) than with imatinib (400 mg once daily [QD], 62.5% and 39.2%, respectively). Cumulative rates of TFR eligibility at 10 years were higher with nilotinib (300 mg BID, 48.6%; 400 mg BID, 47.3%) vs imatinib (29.7%). Estimated 10-year overall survival rates in nilotinib and imatinib arms were 87.6%, 90.3%, and 88.3%, respectively. Overall frequency of adverse events was similar with nilotinib and imatinib. By 10 years, higher cumulative rates of cardiovascular events were reported with nilotinib (300 mg BID, 16.5%; 400 mg BID, 23.5%) vs imatinib (3.6%), including in Framingham low-risk patients. Overall efficacy and safety results support the use of nilotinib 300 mg BID as frontline therapy for optimal long-term outcomes, especially in patients aiming for TFR. The benefit-risk profile in context of individual treatment goals should be carefully assessed.


2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steinunn Arnardóttir ◽  
Jacob Järås ◽  
Pia Burman ◽  
Katarina Berinder ◽  
Per Dahlqvist ◽  
...  

Objective: To describe treatment and long-term outcomes of patients with acromegaly from all health-care regions in Sweden. Design and Methods: Analysis of prospectively reported data from the Swedish Pituitary Register of 698 patients (51% females) with acromegaly diagnosed from 1991-2011. The latest clinical follow-up date was December, 2012, while mortality data were collected for 28.5 years until June, 2019. Results: The annual incidence was 3.7/million; 71% of patients had a macroadenoma, 18% had visual field defects, and 25% had at least one pituitary hormone deficiency. Eighty-two percent had pituitary surgery, 10% radiotherapy and 39% medical treatment. At the 5- and 10-year follow-ups, IGF-I levels were within the reference range in 69% and 78% of patients, respectively. In linear regression the proportion of patients with biochemical control including adjuvant therapy at 10 year follow-up increased over time with 1.23 % per year. The SMR (95% CI) for all patients was 1.29 (1.11-1.49). For patients with biochemical control at the latest follow-up, SMR was not increased, neither among patients diagnosed 1991-2000, SMR 1.06 (0.85-1.33) or 2001-2011, SMR 0.87 (0.61-1.24). In contrast, non- controlled patients at the latest follow up from both decades had elevated SMR, 1.90 (1.33-2.72) and 1.98 (1.24-3.14), respectively. Conclusions: The proportion of patients with biochemical control increased over time. Patients with biochemically controlled acromegaly have normal life expectancy while non-controlled patients still have increased mortality. The high rate of macroadenomas and unchanged age at diagnosis illustrates the need for improvements in the management of patients with acromegaly.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document