A Prospective Randomized Phase I/II Study of Lenalidomide, Melphalan, Prednisone and Thalidomide (RMPT) for Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Patients.

Abstract Abstract 2864 Poster Board II-840 Background. New drug associations may improve patients outcome in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). In newly diagnosed MM patients the addition of lenalidomide or thalidomide or bortezomib, to the standard oral melphalan and prednisone combination significantly increased response rate and event-free survival, showing synergistic effects. Aims. This is a multicenter, randomized, open label phase I/II trial designed to evaluate the safety/efficacy profile of the salvage treatment, Lenalidomide, Melphalan, Prednisone and Thalidomide (RMPT) in patients with relapsed/refractory myeloma. Methods. Oral lenalidomide was administered at 10 mg/day on days 1-21, in combination with oral melphalan at 0.18 mg/kg on days 1–4 and oral prednisone at 2 mg/kg on days 1–4. Thalidomide was administered at 50 mg/day (Arm A) or 100 mg/day (Arm B) on days 1-28. Each course was repeated every 28 days for a total of 6 courses. Maintenance therapy included Lenalidomide alone at 10 mg/day on days 1-21. Aspirin 100 mg/day was given as a prophylaxis for thrombosis. Results. Forthy-four patients with relapsed/refractory MM were enrolled in the study between May 2007 and March 2008, including 22 patients in arm A and 22 patients in arm B. After a median of 5 cycles 75% of patients achieved at least a partial response (PR), including 20% very good partial response (VGPR) and 14% near or complete response (nCR or CR). Among patients who received thalidomide 100 mg, the PR rate was 82% (including 23% VGPR and 23% CR/nCR). Higher response rate was observed among patients who received RMPT in first relapse. The 1-year-progression-free survival was 51,5% and the 1-year survival from study entry was 72%. Hematologic toxicity was the most frequent adverse event. Grade 3-4 hematologic adverse events included: neutropenia (68%), thrombocytopenia (36%) and anemia (32%). Grade 3-4 non hematologic adverse events included: infections (22,7%), neurological toxicity (4,5%) and fatigue (6,8%). No grade 3-4 thromboembolic events were reported. Conclusion. This is the first trial exploring the association of two immunomodulatory drugs, Thalidomide and Lenalidomide. RMPT is an active regimen in patients with relapsed/refractory MM. Toxicities were manageable and the incidence of neutrotoxcities was low. Updated results will be presented at the time of the meeting. Disclosures: Cavallo: CELGENE: Honoraria. Petrucci:CELGENE: Honoraria. Canepa:CELGENE: Honoraria. Boccadoro:CELGENE: CONSULTANCY, ADVISORY COMMITTEES, Research Funding. Palumbo:CELGENE: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Phase I Study of Venetoclax Plus Daratumumab and Dexamethasone, With or Without Bortezomib, in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma With and Without t(11;14)

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.21.00443 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. JCO.21.00443

Author(s):

Nizar J. Bahlis ◽

Rachid Baz ◽

Simon J. Harrison ◽

Hang Quach ◽

Shir-Jing Ho ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Phase I ◽

Phase I Study ◽

Overall Response Rate ◽

Response Rate ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Free Survival ◽

Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽

Grade 3

PURPOSE Venetoclax is an oral BCL-2 inhibitor with single-agent activity in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) with t(11;14) translocation. Venetoclax efficacy in RRMM may be potentiated through combination with agents including bortezomib, dexamethasone, and daratumumab. METHODS This phase I study ( NCT03314181 ) evaluated venetoclax with daratumumab and dexamethasone (VenDd) in patients with t(11;14) RRMM and VenDd with bortezomib (VenDVd) in cytogenetically unselected patients with RRMM. Primary objectives included expansion-phase dosing, safety, and overall response rate. Secondary objectives included further safety analysis, progression-free survival, duration of response, time to progression, and minimal residual disease negativity. RESULTS Forty-eight patients were enrolled, 24 each in parts 1 (VenDd) and 2 (VenDVd). There was one dose-limiting toxicity in part 1 (grade 3 febrile neutropenia, 800 mg VenDd). Common adverse events with VenDd and VenDVd included diarrhea (63% and 54%) and nausea (50% and 50%); grade ≥ 3 adverse events were observed in 88% in the VenDd group and 71% in the VenDVd group. One treatment-emergent death occurred in part 2 (sepsis) in the context of progressive disease, with no other infection-related deaths on study with medians of 20.9 and 20.4 months of follow-up in parts 1 and 2, respectively. The overall response rate was 96% with VenDd (all very good partial response or better [≥ VGPR]) and 92% with VenDVd (79% ≥ VGPR). The 18-month progression-free survival rate was 90.5% (95% CI, 67.0 to 97.5) with VenDd and 66.7% (95% CI, 42.5 to 82.5) with VenDVd. CONCLUSION VenDd and VenDVd produced a high rate of deep and durable responses in patients with RRMM. These results support continued evaluation of venetoclax with daratumumab regimens to treat RRMM, particularly in those with t(11;14).

Download Full-text

Combination of Lenalidomide, Melphalan, Prednisone and Thalidomide (RMPT) in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Results of a Multicenter Phase II Clinical Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v112.11.868.868 ◽

2008 ◽

Vol 112 (11) ◽

pp. 868-868 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Antonio Palumbo ◽

Patrizia Falco ◽

Grazia Sanpaolo ◽

Antonietta Falcone ◽

Vincenzo Ferderico ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Partial Response ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Drug Combination ◽

Response Rate ◽

Oral Prednisone ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Second Line ◽

Open Label ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background: In newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients the addition of lenalidomide or thalidomide or bortezomib to the standard oral melphalan and prednisone (MP) combination significantly increased response rate and event-free survival. In advanced MM, the 4 drug combination VMPT further improves response rate. In this multicenter open label phase I/II trial the safety/efficacy profile of the 4 drug combination, lenalidomide, melphalan, prednisone and thalidomide (RMPT) was evaluated in patients with relapsed/refractory myeloma. Methods: Oral lenalidomide was administered at 10 mg/day on days 1–21, oral melphalan at 0.18 mg/kg on days 1–4, oral prednisone at 2 mg/kg on days 1–4. Thalidomide was administered at 50 mg/day (Arm A) or 100 mg/day (Arm B) on days 1–28. Each course was repeated every 28 days for a total of 6 courses. Aspirin 100 mg/day was given as a prophylaxis for thrombosis. Maintenance therapy included lenalidomide alone at 10 mg/day on days 1–21. Results: Forthy-four patients, median age 69 years (range 47–80), with relapsed or refractory MM were enrolled. Twenty-six patients received RMPT as second line of therapy, 18 as third line. Twenty patients received prior autologous transplant, 10 thalidomide-based regimen, 9 bortezomib-based regimen and 3 allogeneic stem cell transplant. After a median of 2 courses, 75.8% of patients achieved at least a partial response (PR), including 30% very good partial response (VGPR). Among patients who received RMPT as second line therapy the PR rate was 81.8%, including VGPR 36.4%.Among patients who received thalidomide 100 mg, the PR rate was 93.3% (including VGPR 46.7%) compared to 64.7% of thalidomide 50 mg. The 1-year-progressionfree survival was 48.6% and the 1-year survival from study entry was 90%. Grade 3–4 hematologic adverse events included: neutropenia (66.6%), thrombocytopenia (36.3%) and anemia (30.2%). Grade 3–4 non hematologic adverse events included: infections (21.2%), neurological toxicity (6%) and fatigue (9%). No thromboembolic events were reported. Conclusion: Initial results showed that RMPT is an effective salvage therapy with a high proportion of responses. Toxicities were manageable. No thromboembolic complications were reported.

Download Full-text

Combination of Bortezomib, Melphalan, Prednisone and Thalidomide (VMPT) for Relapsed Multiple Myeloma: Results of a Phase I/II Clinical Trial.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v108.11.407.407 ◽

2006 ◽

Vol 108 (11) ◽

pp. 407-407 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Antonio Palumbo ◽

Maria Teresa Ambrosini ◽

Giulia Benevolo ◽

Patrizia Pregno ◽

Norbert Pescosta ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Partial Response ◽

Phase I ◽

Response Rate ◽

Oral Prednisone ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Complete Response ◽

Second Line ◽

Open Label ◽

Free Survival ◽

Line Of Therapy

Abstract BACKGROUND: In newly diagnosed patients, the addition of thalidomide or bortezomib (Velcade™) to the standard oral melphalan/prednisone combination significantly increased response rate and event-free survival. In this multicenter, open-label, non randomized, phase I/II trial, the safety/efficacy profile of the 4 drug combination, bortezomib (Velcade™), melphalan, prednisone, and thalidomide (VMPT) was evaluated in patients with relapsed/refractory myeloma. METHODS: Bortezomib was administered by IV bolus on days 1, 4, 15, 22 at three dose levels: in the first cohort (10 patients) at 1.0 mg/m2; in the second cohort (10 patients) at 1.3 mg/m2and in the third cohort (10 patients) at 1.6 mg/m2. Oral melphalan was administered at 6 mg/m2 on days 1–5, oral prednisone at 60 mg/m2 on days 1–5. Thalidomide was delivered at 50 mg on days 1–35. Each course was repeated every 35 days for a total of 6 courses. RESULTS: Thirty patients, median age 66 years (range 38–79), with relapsed or refractory myeloma were enrolled. Fourteen patients received VMPT as second line of therapy, 16 as third line. Twenty patients received prior autologous transplant, 10 conventional chemotherapy and 9 thalidomide-based regimens. After a median of 6 courses, 20 patients (67%) achieved a partial response (PR) including 13 patients (43%) who achieved at least a very good partial response (VGPR). Among patients who received VMPT as second line treatment, the PR rate was 79%, and the immunofixation negative complete response rate 36%. The 1-year progression-free survival was 61%, and the 1-year survival from study entry was 84%. Grade 3 non-hematological adverse events included: infections (5 patients), fatigue (1), vasculitis (1) and peripheral neuropathy (2); no grade 4 toxicities were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: Initial results showed that VMPT is an effective salvage therapy with a high proportion of responses. Toxicities were manageable. The incidence of neurotoxicities was unexpectedly low.

Download Full-text

Phase I-II Trial of Oral Cyclophosphamide, Prednisone and Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) (CPR) for the Treatment of Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.1874.1874 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 1874-1874 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Donna E. Reece ◽

Esther Masih-Khan ◽

Arooj Khan ◽

Saima Dean ◽

Peter Anglin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Phase I ◽

Dose Level ◽

Research Funding ◽

Overall Response Rate ◽

Response Rate ◽

Oral Cyclophosphamide ◽

Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 1874 Poster Board I-899 Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) and dexamethasone is an effective regimen in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM) patients (pts), with an overall response rate of 60.6% and median time to progression (TTP) of 13.4 months (Dimopoulos MA, et al, Leukemia 2009 Jul 23 [Epub ahead of print]). Oral cyclophosphamide and prednisone is an older regimen with excellent patient tolerance, and we sought to enhance the efficacy of lenalidomide by adding oral cyclophosphamide and prednisone in this phase I-II trial. The CPR regimen consisted of cyclophosphamide on days 1, 8 and 15; lenalidomide on days 1–21; and prednisone 100 mg every other day in a 28 day cycle. ASA 81 mg/day was given to all pts as DVT prophylaxis. Three dose levels were evaluated using a 3 by 3 dose escalation design. Between 11/2007–07/2009, 31 pts with relapsed/refractory MM who had not previously received lenalidomide were entered onto study. Median age was 61 (40–78) years and 61% were male. Immunoglobulin subtype was IgG in 19 pts (61%), IgA in 8 pts (26%) and light chain only in 4 pts (13%). Median number of prior regimens was 2 (1–5) and 28 pts had undergone previous ASCT, including double transplants in 6 pts. Prior therapy included thalidomide in 9 (29%) and bortezomib in 15 (48%). FISH cytogenetics were available in 13 pts; one had 13q deletion but none had t(4;14) or p53 deletion. At the time of protocol entry, median β 2-microglobulin level was 246 (92–767) nm/L, albumin 39 (34–48) g/L, creatinine 83 (50–126) μmol/L, platelet count 230 (75–337) × 109/L and ANC 2.5 (1.1–6.1) x 109/L. Protocol treatment is summarized in Table 1. Dose limiting toxicity was not observed during cycle 1 at any dose level. Grade 3–4 toxicities included thrombocytopenia in 5 pts (16%) and neutropenia in 9 pts (29%). These were managed with dose reduction and/or growth factor support. Four episodes of febrile neutropenia occurred. Other grade 3–4 non-hematologic toxicities included abdominal pain/bacteremia in 1 pt in cohort 1; hypokalemia in 1 pt in cohort 2; and DVT in 2 pts, dizziness in 2 pts and fatigue in 1 pt in cohort 3. Using the International uniform response criteria (Durie BG, et al, Leukemia 2006; 20:1467–1473), the best response was documented at a median of 6 (1–5) cycles and included the following: dose level 1 (1 CR, 2 PR); dose level 2 (1 VGPR, 2 PR); dose level 3 (5 CR, 9 VGPR, 9 PR, 1 MR and 1 stable disease). At a median follow-up (F/U) of 12 (8–21) months, 20 pts remain on study, 2 have withdrawn and 9 pts have progressed at a median of 9 (4–13) months; only 1 one has died (due to MM). We conclude: 1) the combination of full doses of the agents in CPR can be given in a 28 day cycle with minimal toxicity; 2) the overall response rate (CR + VGPR + PR) in 31 pts to date is 93%; 3) at a median F/U of 1 year, only 9 pts (29%) have progressed; 4) longer follow-up is required to assess the TTP and survival of the CPR regimen. Disclosures: Reece: Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide in combination with drugs other than dexamethasone. Anglin:Celgene: Honoraria. Chen:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Kukreti:Celgene: Honoraria. Mikhael:Celgene: Honoraria. Trudel:Celgene: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Safety and Efficacy Analysis of Selinexor-Based Treatment in Multiple Myeloma, a Meta-Analysis Based on Prospective Clinical Trials

Frontiers in Pharmacology ◽

10.3389/fphar.2021.758992 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 12 ◽

Author(s):

Yali Tao ◽

Hui Zhou ◽

Ting Niu

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Partial Response ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Response Rate ◽

Complete Response Rate ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Complete Response ◽

Cochrane Central Register ◽

Safety And Efficacy ◽

Grade 3

Background: Selinexor (SEL) is an orally bioavailable, highly-selective, and slowly-reversible small molecule that inhibits Exportin 1. Preclinical studies showed that SEL had synergistic antimyeloma activity with glucocorticoids, proteasome inhibitors (PIs) and immunomodulators. The combination of selinexor and dexamethasone (DEX) has been approved in the United States for patients with penta-refractory multiple myeloma in July 2019. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of selinexor based treatment in Multiple myeloma.Methods: We systematically searched the Medline (PubMed), Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials Library databases and ClinicalTrials.gov. Outcome measures of efficacy included overall response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), stringent complete response rate (sCR), complete response rate (CR), very good partial response (VGPR), partial response rate (PR), minimal response (MR), rate of stable disease (SDR), rate of progressive disease (PDR) and median progression-free survival (mPFS). Safety was evaluated by the incidences of all grade adverse events and Grade≥3 adverse events. The subgroup analysis was conducted to analyze the difference in different combination treatment regimens (SEL + DEX + PIs vs SEL + DEX).Results: We included six studies with 477 patients. The pooled ORR, CBR, sCR, CR, VGPR, PR, MR, SDR, and PDR were 43% (18–67%), 55% (32–78%), 5% (−2–13%), 7% (4–11%), 14% (5–24%), 23% (15–31%), 11% (8–14%), 26% (14–38%) and 14% (4–23%), respectively. SEL + DEX + PIs treatment had higher ORR (54 vs 24%, p = 0.01), CBR (66 vs 37%, p = 0.01), sCR (10 vs 2%, p = 0.0008), and VGPR (23 vs 5%, p < 0.00001) compared to SEL + DEX treatment, and lower PDR (4 vs 23%, p < 0.00001) and SDR (17 vs 37%, p = 0.0006). The pooled incidences of any grade and grade≥3 were 45 and 30% in hematological AEs, and in non-hematological AEs were 40 and 30%, respectively. The most common all grade (68%) and grade≥3 (54%) hematological AE were both thrombocytopenia. Fatigue was the most common all grade (62%) and grade≥3 (16%) non-hematological AE. Compared to SEL + DEX treatment, SEL + DEX + PIs treatment had lower incidences of hyponatremia (39 vs 12%, p < 0.00001), nausea (72 vs 52%, p < 0.00001), vomiting (41 vs 23%, p < 0.0001), and weight loss (42 vs 17%, p = 0.03) in all grade AEs. Meanwhile, SEL + DEX + PIs treatment had lower incidences of anemia (36 vs 16%, p = 0.02), fatigue (20 vs 13%, p = 0.04), hyponatremia (22 vs 5%, p < 0.0001) than SEL + DEX treatment in grade≥3 AEs.Conclusion: Our meta-analysis revealed that selinexor-based regimens could offer reasonable efficacy and tolerable adverse events in patients with multiple myeloma. SEL + DEX + PIs treatments had higher efficacy and lower toxicities than SEL + DEX.

Download Full-text

Anti–B-Cell Maturation Antigen BiTE Molecule AMG 420 Induces Responses in Multiple Myeloma

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.19.02657 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 38 (8) ◽

pp. 775-783 ◽

Cited By ~ 55

Author(s):

Max S. Topp ◽

Johannes Duell ◽

Gerhard Zugmaier ◽

Michel Attal ◽

Philippe Moreau ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Partial Response ◽

B Cell ◽

Response Rate ◽

Human Study ◽

Cell Maturation ◽

Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽

B Cell Maturation ◽

Grade 3 ◽

B Cell Maturation Antigen

PURPOSE The anti–B-cell maturation antigen BiTE molecule AMG 420 was assessed in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this first-in-human study, up to 10 cycles of AMG 420 were given (4-week infusions/6-week cycles). Patients had progression after ≥ 2 lines of prior therapy and no extramedullary disease. Minimal residual disease (MRD) response was defined as < 1 tumor cell/104 bone marrow cells by flow cytometry. RESULTS Forty-two patients received AMG 420 at 0.2-800 μg/d. Median age was 65 years, and median disease duration was 5.2 years. Median exposure was 1 cycle (range, 1-10 cycles) and 7 cycles (range, 1-10 cycles) for responders. Patients discontinued for disease progression (n = 25), adverse events (AEs; n = 7), death (n = 4), completion of 10 cycles (n = 3), and consent withdrawal (n = 1). Two patients remain on treatment. There were 2 nontreatment-related deaths from AEs, influenza/aspergillosis and adenovirus-related hepatitis. Serious AEs (n = 20; 48%) included infections (n = 14) and polyneuropathy (n = 2); treatment-related serious AEs included 2 grade 3 polyneuropathies and 1 grade 3 edema. There were no grade ≥ 3 CNS toxicities or anti-AMG 420 antibodies. In this study, 800 μg/d was considered to not be tolerable because of 1 instance each of grade 3 cytokine release syndrome and grade 3 polyneuropathy, both of which resolved. The overall response rate was 31% (n = 13 of 42). At the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of 400 μg/d, the response rate was 70% (n = 7 of 10). Of these, five patients experienced MRD-negative complete responses, and 1 had a partial response, and 1 had a very good partial response; all 7 patients responded during the first cycle, and some responses lasted > 1 year. CONCLUSION In this study of AMG 420 in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, the response rate was 70%, including 50% MRD-negative complete responses, at 400 μg/d, the MTD for this study.

Download Full-text

Clinical Efficacy of a Bortezomib, Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone Compared with Bortezomib, Cyclophosphamide, Thalidomide and Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.1868.1868 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 1868-1868

Author(s):

Jae-Sook Ahn ◽

Deok-Hwan Yang ◽

Joon Ho Moon ◽

Sang Kyun Sohn ◽

Sung-Hoon Jung ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Herpes Zoster ◽

Partial Response ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Conflicts Of Interest ◽

Sensory Neuropathy ◽

Salvage Regimen ◽

Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Acyclovir Prophylaxis

Abstract Abstract 1868 Backgrounds & Aims: Salvage therapy such as bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, thalidomide and dexamethasone (Vel-CTD) showed an effective regimen in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM). However, toxicities of this regimen due to combination bortezomib and thalidomide interrupt the consecutive treatments in a few patients. Therefore, we compared the clinical responses and toxicities between bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (Vel-CD) and Vel-CTD in patients with relapsed or refractory MM patients, retrospectively. Methods: Eighty-six patients received at least 2 cycles of treatment with Vel-CTD (bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 i.v. on D1, 4, 8 and 11; cyclophosphamide 150 mg/m2 orally on D1-4; thalidomide 50 mg/day orally every day; and dexamethasone 20 mg/m2 i.v. on D1, 4, 8 and 11 for every 3 weeks) and 67 patients with Vel-CD, which is the same regimen except thalidomide. Vel-CD group was only received low-dose acyclovir for prevention of herpes zoster. Results: 17/67 (25%) and 10/86 (12%) of light chain disease was enrolled in Vel-CD and Vel-CTD group respectively (p=0.027) and there was no statistical difference at baseline demographic and disease characteristics between two groups in the others. The median time from diagnosis to treatment in Vel-CD and Vel-CTD was 15.6 months (range, 2–250 months) and 15.7 months (range, 1–230 months), respectively (p=0.54). The median number of treatment cycles was 6 cycles (range, 2–18) in Vel-CD and 8 cycles (range, 2–24) in Vel CTD group, and the number of cycles delivered was 430 and 678, respectively. The overall response rates (≥PR) of Vel-CD and Vel-CTD group were 88% and 90% ( 49% and 48% of complete response, 9% and 14% of very good partial response, 30% and 28% of partial response), respectively (each, p>0.05). There was no difference in progression free survival (p=0.69) and overall survival (p=0.49). Grade 3 or more hematologic adverse events occurred in the same proportion of patients in the both group. In non hematologic toxicities profiles, Vel-CTD group (14%) showed the higher proportion of grade 3 or more sensory neuropathy compared with Vel-CD group (3%) (p=0.02). Dose adjustment of bortezomib in Vel-CD and Vel-CTD were 40% (27/67) and 41%(35/86), respectively (p=0.96). Two patients (3%) in Vel-CD group received acyclovir prophylaxis developed herpes zoster compared with 17 patients (20%) in Vel-CTD group they were not received acyclovir prophylaxis (p=0.002). Three patients showed thrombotic events (2: pulmonary thromboembolism, 1: acute myocardial infarction) in only Vel-CTD group despite aspirin prophylaxis (p=0.16). Conclusion: Vel-CD combination therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory MM is an effective and more tolerable salvage regimen compared with Vel-CTD in the aspect of comparable response rate, less non-hematologic toxicities especially thalidomide associated adverse events. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

A Multi-Center Phase I/II Trial of Carfilzomib and Pomalidomide with Dexamethasone (Car-Pom-d) in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.74.74 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 74-74 ◽

Cited By ~ 8

Author(s):

Jatin J. Shah ◽

Edward A. Stadtmauer ◽

Rafat Abonour ◽

Adam D Cohen ◽

William I. Bensinger ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Phase I ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 74 Background: Carfilzomib, a novel proteasome inhibitor (PI), and pomalidomide, an immunomodulatory agent (IMiD), have both demonstrated promising activity as single agents or in combination with dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. IMiD+PI combinations including lenalidomide, bortezomib, dexamethasone and lenalidomide, carfilzomib, dexamethasone have had high response rates and good tolerability. We aimed to combine carfilzomib and pomalidomide with dexamethasone (Car-Pom-d) for the first time and hypothesized that this regimen would be highly active in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Here, we report the first findings from the Phase I dose-escalation and expansion portions of the first phase I/II trial of Car-Pom-d in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (NCT01464034). Methods: The primary objectives were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the safety/tolerability of Car-Pom-d. Secondary objectives included determination of overall response rate, time to progression, progression free survival, and time to next therapy. All patients had to be refractory to prior lenalidomide, and must have been relapsed/refractory to their most recent therapy. Treatment consisted of 28-day cycles of oral pomalidomide once daily on days 1–21, intravenous (IV) carfilzomib over 30 minutes on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16, and oral or IV dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22. Dose-escalation of carfilzomib started with 27mg/m2 carfilzomib/4mg pomalidomide/40 mg dexamethasone using a standard 3+3 schema based on dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurring in cycle 1. Carfilzomib was initiated at 20 mg/m2for Cycle 1, days 1–2 at all dose levels. Investigators were permitted to adjust the dose of dexamethasone at any point based on their discretion. Adverse events (AEs) were graded by NCI-CTCAE v4. Response was assessed by the modified International Uniform Response Criteria. Results: In the Phase I dose-escalation portion of the trial, a total of 12 patients were enrolled from 6 centers. The median age was 61 years (range 44–78), 67% were male. The median number of prior regimens was 6 (range 2–15), and median time from diagnosis was 5.1 years. Four (33%) patients had prior stem cell transplant, 11 (92%) had prior bortezomib, and all were lenalidomide-refractory. Cytogenetic abnormalities included 5 patients with del(17p), 2 patients with t(4;14), and 1 patient each with del(13), t(11;14), and t(14;16). In these first 12 patients, drug-related AEs occurring in >20% of patients included fatigue (42%), anemia (33%), pneumonia (33%), dyspnea (25%), and thrombocytopenia (25%). Six (50%) patients experienced grade ≥3 AEs including 2 incidence each of neutropenia and febrile neutropenia. The MTD was established as the starting dose level (carfilzomib 20/27 mg/m2, pomalidomide 4mg, dexamethasone 40 mg). At this dose, 1 of 6 patients experienced a protocol-defined DLT of febrile neutropenia. At dose level 2 (carfilzomib 20/36 mg/m2, pomalidomide 4 mg, dexamethasone 40 mg), 2 of 6 patients experienced DLTs, consisting of grade 4 thrombocytopenia and grade 3 rash. All 12 patients were response evaluable with 2 very good partial response (VGPR), 4 partial response (PR), 2 minor response (MR), 2 stable disease (SD), and 2 progressive disease (PD) for a ≥ MR rate of 67%. The 6 month progression free survival was 70% (95% CI: 37 to 90%). Of the 5 patients with del(17p), 1 achieved VGPR, 2 achieved PR, 1 achieved SD. We then enrolled an expansion cohort of 20 patients from 8 centers resulting in a total study population of 32 patients, with 25 still receiving treatment. Three patients have died, all from progressive multiple myeloma. Early response assessments in 27 out of 32 patients show 2 VGPR, 7 PR, 6 MR, 8 SD, and 4 PD for a ≥MR rate of 56%. Conclusions: The Car-Pom-d regimen is well tolerated and achieves a high response rate in a heavily pre-treated, lenalidomide-refractory population with prior bortezomib exposure. Importantly, we have seen responses in patients with poor risk cytogenetics, specifically del (17p). We are beginning enrollment in a larger phase 2 cohort, and updated safety and efficacy data for all patients will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures: Shah: Celgene: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Array: Consultancy. Stadtmauer:Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Abonour:Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Cohen:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bensinger:Onyx: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Gasparetto:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Kaufman:Millenium: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy. Lentzsch:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Vogl:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Otsuka: Consultancy; Acetylon: Research Funding. Orlowski:Onyx: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Durie:Onyx: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Millenium: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Clinical Outcome of Bortezomib Retreatment in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

BioMed Research International ◽

10.1155/2014/145843 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 2014 ◽

pp. 1-7 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

Jae-Sook Ahn ◽

Sung-Hoon Jung ◽

Seung-Shin Lee ◽

Seo-Yeon Ahn ◽

Deok-Hwan Yang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Partial Response ◽

Sensory Neuropathy ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Complete Response ◽

Free Survival ◽

Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Peripheral Sensory ◽

Good Partial Response

This retrospective study investigated the clinical efficacy and safety of bortezomib retreatment in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM). A total of 30 patients who relapsed or progressed after≥6 months since the last dose of their previous bortezomib therapy were included in this study. During the median 6 cycles (range: 2–12) of bortezomib retreatment, 10 (33.3%), 2 (6.7%), and 6 (20.0%) patients achieved complete response, very good partial response, and partial response, respectively. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (47.0%), thrombocytopenia (43.0%), anemia (10.0%), and peripheral sensory neuropathy (3.0%) were observed. The median time to progression, progression-free survival, and overall survival were 5.8 months (95% CI: 2.6–9.0), 5.5 months (95% CI: 4.2–6.8), and 13.4 months (95% CI: 6.1–20.7), respectively. Patients who received bortezomib retreatment≥12 months from initial last therapy had a 1-year OS rate of 65.8% (95% CI: 43.5–88.1) while patients receiving retreatment after 6–12 months interval had a 1-year OS rate of 41.7% (95% CI: 13.9–69.5) (P=0.038). In conclusion, this study demonstrates that retreatment with bortezomib is an effective strategy for patients with MM who relapsed at a long interval after initial bortezomib therapy.

Download Full-text

Phase II Study of the Combination of Daratumumab, Ixazomib, Pomalidomide, and Dexamethasone As Salvage Therapy in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Results of a Safety Run-in Analysis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-123506 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 3117-3117 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Caitlin L. Costello ◽

Michelle Padilla ◽

Edward D. Ball ◽

Carolyn Mulroney

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Research Funding ◽

Overall Response Rate ◽

Response Rate ◽

Residual Disease ◽

Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽

Overall Response ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Observation Period

Background: Triplet combination strategies have widely been accepted as the standard of care for the management of multiple myeloma due to improved outcomes as compared to doublets. The combination of daratumumab, pomalidomide and dexamethasone (DPd) has previously demonstrated deep and durable responses, including high rates of MRD negativity, in a heavily pretreated patient population. Quadruplet regimens offer an opportunity to further improve upon these results. We report preliminary findings from an ongoing phase 2 multicenter trial of the addition of ixazomib to the combination of DPd in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. The primary objective is to determine overall response rate and the safety and tolerability of this novel regimen. Key secondary endpoints include PFS, OS and MRD negativity rates. Methods: Eligible patients may have received ≥1 and ≤3 prior lines of therapy, have had no prior exposure to daratumumab or ixazomib, and may have not progressed on prior pomalidomide. Patients receive daratumumab 16mg/kg IV weekly x 8 doses, biweekly x 8 doses, then monthly, pomalidomide 4mg PO days 1-21/28, ixazomib 4mg PO days 1,8,15 every 28 days, and dexamethasone 40mg PO weekly. Patients continue on therapy until disease progression, intolerability or preference. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) were defined as grade 3-4 hematologic adverse events (AE) or any AE that required a dose modification of pomalidomide or ixazomib at the lowest dose levels on a dose de-escalation plan. An interim safety review was performed after the first 6 patients were enrolled and completed the DLT observation period, which is the first cycle (28 days) since the start of a new dose level of pomalidomide and/or ixazomib. Results: At the time of this analysis, six patients have been enrolled and treated, and completed the DLT observation period. Patients had a median age of 62 (range 52-65) and median number of 2 prior lines of therapy (range 1-2). All patients were refractory to lenalidomide and pomalidomide-naïve. Common adverse events (AEs) included neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, GI upset, and upper respiratory infection. Grade 3-4 AEs were predominantly hematologic including neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, but also included grade 3 hypertension in 1 patient, and grade 3 hypophosphatemia, grade 4 hypokalemia, and grade 3 small bowel infection in 1 patient. No IRR > grade 2 occurred with daratumumab administration. No DLTs occurred in the first six patients in the safety run-in. The overall response rate of the cohort is 100% with 3 patients achieving a stringent complete response (CR), and 3 patients achieving a very good partial response (VGPR) after a median of 7 cycles of treatment. One patient discontinued therapy due to influenza A, the other five remain on therapy. Minimal residual disease assessments are being performed by EuroFlow for patients in VGPR or better due to concern for daratumumab interference. Pharmacodynamic changes in patients' tumor microenvironments were established by custom panel mass cytometry to include T-cell memory and activated subpopulations, B-cell content, NK-cell subpopulations as well as MDSCs, Tregs and T-exhaustive markers, monocytes and dendritic cells. Conclusion: The quadruplet regimen DIPd in patients with relapsed/refractory myeloma is a well-tolerated combination and has shown early safety in an initial safety run-in analysis. Enrollment continues in an expansion cohort to assess efficacy at multiple sites with the University of California Hematologic Malignancies Consortium. Figure Disclosures Costello: Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text