Sustained Responses and Resistance to Imatinib Mesylate in the First 173 Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Accrued by the SCREEN Multicenter Study: First Interim Report.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 4276-4276
Author(s):  
Paolo Vigneri ◽  
Fabio Stagno ◽  
Stefania Stella ◽  
Alessandra Cupri ◽  
Michele Massimino ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4276 Introduction Imatinib mesylate (IM) has shown unprecedented effectiveness in the treatment of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) patients (pts) in the chronic phase of the disease. As most of the data concerning the efficacy of the drug derive either from a single sponsored trial or from single institution reports, we decided to accrue all CML pts diagnosed in the Italian region of Sicily to the observational SCREEN (Siciliy CML Regional Enterprise) study, to evaluate the hematological, cytogenetic and molecular responses of this unselected population to IM. Patients and Methods Although the study is still ongoing, 173 consecutive CML pts have been enrolled between January 2005 and June 2009 (cutoff time for the first interim analysis) by one of the 12 institutions involved. Each center was responsible for the diagnosis, treatment (IM 400 mg qd) and follow-up of the pts accrued, while all molecular analyses were centralized in Catania. Median follow-up time was 31 months. Eleven pts (6.3%) are currently off study. Results Pts characteristics were as follows: 95 males (54.9%) and 78 females (45.1%) were enrolled with a median age of 53 years (range 24-90). Eighty-nine pts (51.4%) were low Sokal risk, 62 (35.8%) were intermediate risk and 22 (12.8%) were high risk. Nine pts (5.2%) displayed additional chromosomal abnormalities. Median leukocyte counts (1×109L) were 67.6 (range 3.4-718), median hemoglobin (g/L) was 122 (range 75-170) while median platelet counts (1×109L) were 317 (range 67-2620). Cumulative incidences of complete hematologic response (CHR) and complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) were 98.3% and 85% respectively, while 59.2% of pts obtained a major molecular response (MMR). At 54 months, estimated overall survival was 95.6%. Estimated progression free survival (accounting for all pts that failed IM according to the European Leukemia Net criteria) was 75.1%. Thirty pts (17.3%) presented resistance to IM, either because of failure to obtain a satisfactory response (primary resistance, 21 pts) or because of loss of previously obtained responses (secondary resistance, 9 pts). Thirty-three pts (19%) presented a suboptimal response, 8 because of failure to achieve a CCyR by 12 months of therapy and the remaining 25 because of lack of a MMR after 18 months of IM. Only 3 pts (1.7%) were intolerant to IM. Interestingly, the median amount of BCR-ABL transcript at diagnosis (measured according to the International standardized Scale) displayed by pts that failed IM or achieved a suboptimal response (106.5IS) was significantly higher than that of pts obtaining an optimal response (61.9 IS p=0.0031). Conclusions IM is a highly effective and well-tolerated treatment for most chronic phase CML pts, producing high rates of CHR and CCyR. Approximately 60% of cases will also achieve a MMR. 35-40% of pts will either fail IM or obtain only partially satisfying results (suboptimal response). High levels of BCR-ABL transcript at diagnosis might allow a rapid identification of this less responsive pt population. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3302-3302
Author(s):  
Massimo Breccia ◽  
Fabio Stagno ◽  
Roberto Latagliata ◽  
Paolo Vigneri ◽  
Laura Cannella ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3302 Poster Board III-190 Introduction Imatinib mesylate (IM) given at a daily dose of 400 mg currently represents the gold standard of care for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase (CP). European LeukemiaNet (ELN) guidelines propose IM dose escalation to rescue those CML patients with either suboptimal response or drug resistance. We report on the long-term efficacy of IM dose escalation in 74 patients with CP-CML after suboptimal response or failure to IM conventional dose. Patients and methods Median age was 50 years (range 19-85), there were 52 males and 22 females. Thirteen patients were classified as hematologic failure (10 primary and 3 secondary), 57 patients as cytogenetic resistance (24 primary and 33 acquired). Three patients escalated the dose for cytogenetic suboptimal response and one patient for molecular suboptimal response at 18 months. Fifty-four received IM dose escalation from 400 to 600 mg and 20 patients from 400 to 800 mg. Results Overall, after a median follow-up of 36 months, 68/74 (91.8%) patients maintained or achieved a complete haematologic response (CHR); this was maintained in all patients who escalated the dose for cytogenetic failure or suboptimal response. A major cytogenetic response (MCyR) was achieved in 41 patients (72%) who escalated the dose for cytogenetic failure and in 6/13 (46%) patients who escalated imatinib for hematologic failure (p=0.002). Overall, complete cytogenetic responses (CCR) were achieved in 27 (37%) out of 74 CML patients: of the 13 hematologic failure patients, only 5 achieved CCyR: all patients had prior acquired resistance to imatinib. Of the 57 cytogenetic failure, 22 reached CCR: this response was obtained in 27% of the primary cytogenetic resistant, and in 50% of the acquired cytogenetic resistant patients (p=0.02). Three patients who escalated the dose for cytogenetic suboptimal response obtained CCR and complete molecular response (CMR), whereas one patient who escalated the dose for molecular suboptimal response at 18 months did not obtain CMR. Median time to cytogenetic response was 3.5 months. Cytogenetic responses occurred in 37/50 patients who escalated the dose to 600 mg and in 10/20 patients who escalated to 800 mg daily (p=0.234). CMR was obtained in 10 patients: in 7 patients who escalated the dose for cytogenetic failure and in 3 patients who escalated imatinib for suboptimal cytogenetic response. Estimated 2 year-progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) is 87% and 85% respectively. Sixteen patients (21.6%) experienced toxicities and had temporarily IM interruption. Conclusions Imatinib dose escalation can induce sustained responses in a subset of patients with cytogenetic resistance and a prior suboptimal cytogenetic response to standard-dose imatinib, whereas it appears less effective in haematologic failure patients or in molecular sub-optimal responders. The availability of second generation TKI should be taken into account in these letter categories of patients. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 630-630 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danthala Madhav

Abstract Introduction: The patent expiration of Imatinib mesylate (Glivec, ®Novaritis) on February 1, 2016, has brought the focus back on generic versions of the drug, and an opportunity to provide a safe and cost effective alternative. India has witnessed a mushrooming of home grown pharmaceutical companies, that have drawn on Darwinian theory to promote the concept of "survival of the cheapest", in pursuit of a deeper penetrance into the cash strapped population. The launch of Veenat (®NATCO pharma) at a fraction of the price of the innovator drug is a case in point. Objectives: To determine the molecular and cytogenetic responses, survival endpoints (event free survival (EFS), failure free survival (FFS), transformation free survival (TFS), overall survival (OS), and safety of innovator and generic brands of imatinib. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective analysis, data from 1,812 patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) treated with frontline Imatinib mesylate (Innovator/Generic) at a single institution between 2008 and 2014 is included. Of these 1,812 patients, 445 were excluded due to inadequate data and follow up. Thus, data from 1,193 patients who were treated with Glivec (®Novartis), and 174 patients with Veenat (®NATCO) was available. Observations: A higher percentage of patients in the generic arm compared to the innovator arm, were in accelerated phase (9.7% vs 6.7%) and blast crisis (7.4% vs 3.7%), respectively.After a median follow up of 1,347 days, 805 (67.4%) patients achieved complete cytogenetic response (CCgR), 259 (21.7%) achieved major molecular response (MR3), and 205 (17.1%) achieved 4 log reduction in BCR ABL transcripts (MR4) in the innovator arm. After a median follow up of 1,220 days, 112 (64.3%), 24 (13.7%), and 42(24.1%) patients achieved a CCgR, MR3 and MR4 respectively, in the generic arm.Follow up assessments using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (q-PCR) and/ or cytogenetic tests were not available in 230 (19.2%) and 40 (22.9%) patients, in the innovator and generic groups respectively, despite inclusion in a sponsorship program.Adherence to treatment was poor in 192 (16%) and 30 (17.2%) patients in the innovator and generic arms respectively. Results: In a fairly homogenous population of lower economic strata, on a free drug access program, the prime factors influencing adherence were low educational level, assumptions of "cure", recent bereavement, stigma of cancer diagnosis and repeated hospital visits. Transformation to accelerated/blast phase occurred in 7.7% and 7.4% of patients in the innovator and generic arms respectively. Testing for BCR-ABL1 mutations was done in 31 (17.8%) patients in the generic arm and 132(11%) patients in the innovator arm, after failure of treatment or suboptimal response. Mutations were identified in 14 (8%) patients in the generic arm and 52 (4.3%) patients in the innovator arm.The most common subsequent treatments chosen were, dose escalation (249 [20.8%] vs 30 [17.2%]), Nilotinib (26 [2.1%] vs 8 [4.5%]), Dasatinib (11 [0.9%] vs 9 [5.1%]) and hydroxyurea (11 [0.9%] and 4 [2.2%]) in the innovator and generic arms respectively. There was no difference in EFS (p=0.46), FFS (p=0.16), TFS (p=0.9), or OS (p=0.13) between the two groups. The frequency of reported grade 1, or 2 non-hematological adverse events which included musculoskeletal pain, muscle cramps, and peripheral edema, and hematological adverse events was comparable between the study groups. However, the incidence of grade 3 skin rash was higher in the generic group (2.8%) in comparison to the innovator group (0.2%). Conclusion: The findings of the present study showed comparable efficacy and safety of the generic and innovator versions of imatinib in the treatment of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4038-4038 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Latagliata ◽  
Massimo Breccia ◽  
Ida Carmosino ◽  
Federico Vozella ◽  
Federico De Angelis ◽  
...  

Abstract Differences in baseline features and follow-up among patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) according to age at diagnosis have been recently reported in cohorts from clinical controlled trials (Castagnetti F et al, 2015). To evaluate this issue in a real-life setting, we revised 207 consecutive CML patients treated at our Institution with imatinib frontline from 6/2002 to 6/2013, dividing them in young adults (>20 <45 years) (YA), middle-aged adults (≥45 <65 years) (MA) and elderly (≥65 years) (EL). The main features at baseline of the whole cohort and of the 3 age groups are reported in the Table. Table.ALLYAMAELpN° of patients207617274M/F108/8930/3140/3238/360.752Median WBC (x 109/l)IQR66.1 (32.7 - 119.0)109.8 (65.9 - 148.0)59.5 (31.3 - 126.6)40.1 (26.5 - 81.4)<0.001Median Hb (g/dl)(IQR)12.5 (11.0 - 13.5)11.7 (9.8 - 12.7)12.7 (11.0 - 14.2)12.8 (11.3 - 13.7)0.002Median PLT (x 109/l)IQR414 (275 - 616)445 (291 - 597)378 (262 - 546)457 (271 - 732)0.287Spleen enlargement (>5cm) N° (%)17 (8.3)11 (18.3)4 (5.6)2 (2.7)0.003Sokal score (N°)Low/Int/High89/93/2047/9/338/27/54/57/12<0.001Comorbidities ≥ 2, N° (%)77 (37.2)5 (8.1)26 (36.1)46 (62.1)<0.001 The rates of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) were similar (86.4% in YA, 95.5% in MA and 91.0% in EL, p=0.227) while the rate of major molecular response was higher in the MA group (89.7% vs 63.8% in YA and 75.8% in EL, p=0.001). The number of events (permanent discontinuation due to toxicity, primary or secondary resistance, any death for CML related or unrelated causes) was lower in the MA group [8 (11.1%) vs 21 (34.4%) in YA and 28 (37.8%) in EL, p=0.001]: no difference was observed in the rate of evolution to blastic phase [3 (4.9%) in YA, 1 (1.4%) in MA and 2 (2.7%) in EL, p=0.478]. The number of deaths was higher in the EL group [12 (16.2%) vs 2 (3.2%) in YA and 0 in MA, p<0.001]: it is worth of note, however, that 11/12 deaths in the EL group were not related to CML progression. The 4-year event-free survival (EFS) for the whole cohort was 73.5% (95%CI 67.0 - 80.0): the 4-year EFS in the MA group [92.0% (95%CI 85.1 - 98.9)] was significantly higher than in YA group [67.3% (95%CI 55.1 - 79.5)] and in EL group [61.1% (95%CI 49.5 - 73.7)] (p=0.001). The 4-year overall survival (OS) for the whole cohort was 94.4% (95%CI 90.9 - 97.9): the 4-year OS in the EL group [72.4.% (95%CI 56.9 - 87.9)] was significantly lower than in YA group [96.3% (95%CI 91.2 - 100)] and in MA group (100%) (p<0.001). In conclusion, age at diagnosis influences significantly the course of CML patients treated with imatinib: the MA group has the best follow-up with an excellent OS and EFS, while the relatively lower OS and EFS in the EL group are clearly related to the incidence of unrelated deaths like in the general aged population. A possible explanation of the counterintuitive worse course of YA group is the delayed diagnosis in these patients (higher WBC counts, lower Hb levels, higher rate of spleen enlargement > 5 cm) compared to aged patients, who have often concomitant diseases and make routinely blood analyses: however, a more aggressive biology of CML in YA could not be excluded and warrants further investigations. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-54
Author(s):  
Reni Widyastuti ◽  
Melva Louisa ◽  
Ikhwan Rinaldi ◽  
Riki Nova ◽  
Instiaty Instiaty ◽  
...  

Background: Imatinib mesylate is the first tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) therapy. Imatinib is an effective drug. However, previous studies have shown that about 20-30% of patients eventually would develop resistance to imatinib. Approximately 40% of imatinib resistance is associated with BCRABL kinase domain mutation. One of the most common and serious variations account for imatinib response is T315I of ABL1 gene. Objective: The study aimed to examine the association of T315I mutation with the ABL1 gene and its relation to major molecular response (MMR) achievement in CML patients. This study also examined other mutations adjacent to T315I, i.e., F311I, F317L, and different possible variations in the ABL1 gene. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study on Indonesian CML patients in chronic phase. We analyzed 120 blood samples from patients in chronic phase who have received imatinib mesylate (IM) for ≥12 months. Results: There were no T315I, F311I, and F317L mutations found in this study. However, we found another variation, which was 36 substitutions from A to G at position 163816 of ABL1 gene (according to NG_012034.1). Conclusions: We found no T315I, F311I, and F317L mutations in this study. Our findings suggest that there might be other factors that influenced the MMR achievement in our study patients. However, there were 36 substitutions from A to G at position 163.816 (according to NG_012034.1) that needed further examination to explore the significance of this mutation in clinical practice.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 530-538 ◽  
Author(s):  
Onyee Chan ◽  
Chetasi Talati ◽  
Leidy Isenalumhe ◽  
Samantha Shams ◽  
Lisa Nodzon ◽  
...  

Abstract Ponatinib is associated with cardiovascular adverse events (CAEs), and its frequency in the real world is limited. In this retrospective study, we examined the survival outcomes and associated toxicities in 78 consecutive ponatinib-treated patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) at the Moffitt Cancer Center from January 2011 through December 2017. The most common non-CAE was thrombocytopenia (39.7%), occurring in a dose-dependent fashion. Eighteen patients (23.1%) experienced some form of CAE, with the most common being arrhythmia (9%) and hypertension (7.7%), whereas 3 patients experienced myocardial infarction (3.8%). Before 2014, most patients were started on ponatinib 45 mg daily. There was an inverse correlation between cardio-oncology referral and the number of CAEs (P = .0440); however, a lower ponatinib starting dose, more frequent dose reduction, and increased cardio-oncology referral all were likely to have contributed to the observed decrease in CAEs after 2014. The response rate and 5-year overall survival (OS) were higher than those observed in the Ponatinib Ph+ ALL and CML Evaluation (PACE) trial (major molecular response, 58.7% vs 40% and OS, 76% vs 73%; median follow-up of 32.5 months). Ponatinib-treated patients with chronic phase–CML did not show a significant improvement with allogeneic stem cell transplantation, whereas those with accelerated phase/blast phase–CML had a much better outcome (median OS of 32.9 months vs 9.2 months; P = .01). These results demonstrate that ponatinib is highly effective. Dose adjustments and increased awareness of the cardiotoxicities associated with ponatinib may help maximize its benefits.


Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 2158-2158
Author(s):  
Giuliana Alimena ◽  
Massimo Breccia ◽  
Luigia Luciano ◽  
Fabrizio Quarantelli ◽  
Daniela Diverio ◽  
...  

Abstract Imatinib mesylate was given to 26 Philadelphia positive (Ph+) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients who were in late chronic phase (CP) and in stable complete cytogenetic response (CCR) after interferon-alfa (IFN-α), but showed persistent positive residual disease at PCR analysis under this treatment. At diagnosis median age was 40 years (range 21–64) and according to Sokal’s score, 18 patients were low risk and 8 were intermediate risk. Median IFN treatment was 88 mo.s (range 15–202) and median CCR duration was 73 mo.s (range 10–148). Imatinib was administered at the standard dose of 400 mg/die, after stopping IFN for 1 week. Residual disease was measured on bone marrow (BM) cells at baseline, before starting Imatinib, at 3, 6, 12, 18 mo.s and at the last follow-up (median 32 mo.s, range 21–49), by assaying BCR-ABL transcripts using quantitative PCR (RQ-PCR). The copy number (CN) of BCR/ABL and ABL transcript were derived by the interpolation of CT values to the appropriate standard curve, and the result, for each sample, was expressed as ratio of BCR/ABL mRNA copies to ABL mRNA x 100 (normalized copy number - NCN). Imatinib treatment resulted in a progressive and consistent decline of residual disease in all but one patient, from a median of 0.89 at baseline to 0.01 at the end of follow-up. Major molecular response (BCR/ABL levels <0.1) was reached in 20 patients (77%) and BCR/ABL transcripts were undetectable in 13 (50%). Achievement of molecular response was significantly correlated with post-IFN baseline transcript level (mean 1.194 for patients achieving complete molecular response vs 18,97 for those who did not; p<0.001), but not with other clinical/biological patient characteristics. In all patients, imatinib was well tolerated with no side effects requiring drug dose reduction or dose discontinuation. Albeit obtained from an unusual subset of selected patients with favourable prognosis, and likely particularly sensitive to imatinib, present results confirm the efficacy of combining Imatinib and IFN-α and further support investigating treatment approaches employing these two drugs.


Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 4800-4800
Author(s):  
Selim Corm ◽  
Ariane Leroyer ◽  
Mathieu Wemeau ◽  
Bruno Bregman ◽  
Abderrahim Oukessou ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective: To describe the use and results of imatinib mesylate (IM) treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in the Nord-Pas de Calais Region in Northern France (~ 4 millions inhabitants). Methods: we identified all IM treated patients (pts) within the population of all confirmed diagnosis of CML occurred during the period 1985–2004. IM resistance (haematological and cytogenetic imatinib failure and suboptimal response) was evaluated according to the European LeukemiaNet consensus. Results: 302 pts (38.6% of the global cohort of diagnosis) were included in this retrospective study. If we consider new diagnosis occurred after Januar 1st 2001, 163 pts (90.6%) have been treated by IM. At the initiation of IM: 18 pts (6%) were in advanced phase (accelerated and blastic), 245 pts (81,1%) in chronic phase (CP) (with Ph+ metaphases &gt; 35%), 35 (11,6%) had major cytogenetic response (MCyR) obtained with interferon (IFN) or bone marrow transplantation (BMT). Four pts (1,3%) had an unknown status. The percentage of alive pts at the last update (December 31th 2005) according to the disease stage at initiation of treatment is given in the table 1.In the sample of 245 CP pts, 139 (56.7%) had been previously treated by IFN, the median CML duration prior to IM was 4.7 months [0–174], the median IM treatment duration was 31.3 months [0.5–72.3] and the median follow-up after IM initiation was 36 month [5.2–72.3]. 214 pts (87.30%) were alive at the last update with 169 (79%) still on IM and 161 (75.2%) on IM as monotherapy. The median and mean IM daily doses of alive pts are 400 mg and 409.5 mg, respectively. Seventeen pts (6.9%) stopped IM for intolerance. The haematological and cytogenetic follow-up was informative for 206 CP pts (84.1%): MCyR 155 pts (75.2%) and CCyR 144 pts (69.9%). IM resistance occurred in 73 (35.4%) of these 206 evaluable pts, including 23 (11.1%) accelerations and blastic transformations. In the subgroup of IM resistant pts 47 (64.4%) have increased their IM posology. The mean of the maximum daily dose in the resistant subgroup was 607.5 mg (median 600 mg). BCR-ABL kinase domain mutations were found in 15 (20.5%) pts amoung IM resistant population. The estimated 5-years survival rate of the CP pts is 81.3%. Previous treatment by IFN doesn’t influence significantly the survival, nor the duration of the disease before IM initiation, even if we found a trend for a better survival when this period was inferior to 6 months (5 years survival rate 90.4% vs 77.5%, p=0.16). BMT was performed for 31 pts (10.3%) including 19 pts (6.3%) after the initiation of IM therapy. Conclusion: these real life observations show the large use of IM in the last years and its great impact on the management and the survival of CML pts. IM resistance occurs in 1/3 of pts but the disease duration prior to IM is heterogeneous. An increase of IM dose has been tried in most IM resistant pts. The response to the different therapy adaptations is under study and will be presented. The vast majority of pts are still on IM therapy at the last update. Table 1


Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 181-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianantonio Rosti ◽  
Fausto Castagnetti ◽  
Angela Poerio ◽  
Massimo Breccia ◽  
Luciano Levato ◽  
...  

Abstract Imatinib (IM) 400 mg daily is the standard treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia in early chronic phase (ECP): the results of the IRIS trial have shown a 72 months overall survival of 95%; EFS and PFS were 83% and 93%, respectively; the cumulative rate of complete cytogenetic response (CCgR) for the IM 400 mg arm was 25% at 3 months (at 6, 12, 18 and 60 months it was 51%, 69%, 76% and 87%, respectively). Nilotinib, a second generation TKI, has a higher binding affinity and selectivity for Abl with respect to IM, being 20 to 50 times more active in IM-sensitive cell lines and is highly effective in IM resistant patients, across every disease phase. To investigate the therapeutic efficacy and the safety of nilotinib 400 mg BID in untreated, ECP, Ph-pos CML patients, the italian GIMEMA CML Working Party is conducting an open-label, single stage, multicentric, phase II study trial (ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT00481052); all patients provided written informed consent. The primary endpoint is the CCgR rate at 1 year; the kinetic of molecular response is studied by Q-PCR baseline and after 1, 2, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months from treatment start. PATIENTS Seventy-three patients have been enrolled from 20 Centres between June, 2007 and February, 2008. The median age was 51 years (range 18–83), 45% low, 41% intermediate and 14% high Sokal risk. Median follow-up is currently 210 days (range 68–362). RESULTS All 73 patients and 48/73 (66%) completed 3 and 6 months on treatment, respectively. Response at 3 and 6 months (ITT): the CHR rate was 100% and 98%, the CCgR rate 78% and 96%, respectively. A MMR, defined as a BCR-ABL:ABL ratio &lt; 0.1% according to the International Scale, was achieved by 3% of all treated patients after 1 month on treatment, but this proportion rapidly increased to 22% after 2 months, 59% after 3 months and 74% after 6 months. One patient progressed at 6 months to accelerated-blastic phase with the T315I mutation. NILOTINIB DOSE AND COMPLIANCE No dose escalation was permitted in case of resistance; the median daily average dose was close to the intended dose, 789 mg (range 261 – 800); 34/73 patients (47%) interrupted nilotinib at least once, with a median duration of dose interruption of 15 days (range 2–98). The dose of nilotinib at the last visit was 400 mg BID for 52 patients (71%), 400 mg daily for 20 patients (27%) and 200 mg daily for 1 patient (1%). ADVERSE EVENTS: AEs (grade III/IV) were manageable with appropriate dose adaptations: hematologic toxicity was recorded so far in 4 pts (5% - only 1 event grade IV neutropenia); the most frequent biochemical laboratory abnormalities (grade III) were total bilirubin increase (15%), GOT/GPT increase (11%) and lipase increase (4%). Only 1 episode of grade IV lipase increase was recorded. It is noteworthy, considering the 48 cases with at least 6 months of follow-up, that the incidence of any grade II and III nonhematologic adverse event, decreased from 50% and 8% (first 3 months) to 23% and 6% (second trimester), respectively. ECG monitoring: in 16 patients (22%), transient and not clinically relevant ECG abnormalities have been recorded; 2 more patients (3%) revealed a transient and uneventful QTc prolongation (&gt;450 but &lt;499 msec). CONCLUSIONS: The results that have been achieved in these unselected patients and within a multicentric trial, strongly support the notion that in ECP Ph-pos CML patients both cytogenetic and molecular responses to nilotinib are substantially faster than the responses to IM. Acknowledgments: Work supported by European LeukemiaNet, COFIN, University of Bologna and BolognAIL.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1128-1128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanna Jean Khoury ◽  
Michael J. Mauro ◽  
Yousif Matloub ◽  
Tai-Tsang Chen ◽  
Erkut Bahceci ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1128 Poster Board I-150 Imatinib (IM), a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), has been the mainstay of treatment for chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML). However, IM resistance and intolerance are of considerable clinical relevance. Dasatinib (DAS), a second-line TKI, is effective in the IM-intolerant patient population. The purpose of this study was to determine baseline factors that can affect DAS response and evaluate long term efficacy in this population. Intolerance to IM was defined as ≥ Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity and/or Grade 4 hematologic toxicity lasting > 7 days. A total of 271 Ph+ CP-CML IM-intolerant patients who received DAS were pooled from two randomized trials (Phase II-trial, CA 180013 and Phase III trial, CA 180034). DAS doses were 50 mg BID (n=43), 70 mg BID (n=141), 100 mg QD (n=43) or 140 mg QD (n=44). At baseline, the median duration of disease for the IM-intolerant patients was 24 months (range: 0.9-182.5) and the median duration of IM therapy was 9 months (range: 0.03-69.06). Of these patients, 46 (17%) had hematologic toxicity and 228 (84.1%) had non-hematologic toxicity to IM. Seventy-nine (29%) patients had prior complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) on IM and 171 (63%) patients did not. The data for prior CyR to IM was not reported for 21 (7.7%) patients. Of the 79 patients who had achieved CCyR on IM, 30 patients had maintained CCyR and 49 patients had lost this response prior to start of DAS. Of the 171 patients who did not achieve CCyR on IM, 62 (36.3%) had been on IM for 3 12 months and 109 (63.7%) for < 12 months. At 2-year follow up of the 271 patients treated with DAS, 121 (44.6%) discontinued DAS (7.4% due to hematologic toxicity and 14% due to non-hematologic toxicity). Of the patients who were intolerant of IM due to hematologic toxicity (n=46), 10 (21.7%) discontinued DAS due to hematologic toxicity, and 3 (6.5%) due to other toxicities. Of the patients with non-hematologic IM-intolerance (n=228), 10 (4.4%) discontinued DAS due to hematologic toxicity, and 35 (15.4%) due to other toxicities. The median average daily dose of DAS was 99 mg/day in the population who achieved CCyR on DAS and 71.5 mg/day in the population who did not achieve CCyR on DAS. The probability of achieving CCyR on DAS was 43.5% in patients with hematologic IM-intolerance versus 78.9% with non-hematologic IM-intolerance. The CCyR, major molecular response (MMR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) at 2-year follow up for the groups classified by their CCyR status at start of DAS or IM-intolerance status are summarized in Table 1. Conclusions DAS was well-tolerated and associated with high rates of CyR in IM-intolerant patients. Patients with a prior CCyR to IM and those who switched due to non-hematologic imatinib-intolerance had the highest rates of CCyR and MMR on DAS, while patients without CCyR after more than 12 months of IM therapy or IM-intolerance due to hematologic toxicity had the lowest rates of CCyR and MMR. Disclosures Khoury: BMS: Honoraria; Wyeth: Honoraria; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Chemgenex: Honoraria; Genzyme: Honoraria. Mauro:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Matloub:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment. Chen:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment. Bahceci:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment. Deininger:Novartis: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Calistoga: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document