KIT Inhibitor Midostaurin Exhibits a High Rate of Clinically Meaningful and Durable Responses in Advanced Systemic Mastocytosis: Report of a Fully Accrued Phase II Trial

Abstract Abstract 316 Background: The pathogenetic and high frequency D816V KIT mutation in aggressive systemic mastocytosis (ASM) and mast cell leukemia (MCL) exhibits in vitro and clinical resistance to imatinib. Midostaurin (PKC412) is an inhibitor of the KIT tyrosine kinase and can block D816V KIT-transformed cell growth at an IC50 of 30–40nM. Herein we report updated results of our fully accrued investigator-initiated, multicenter, phase II study of oral PKC412 in World Health Organization-defined ASM/MCL patients (pts). Method: PKC412 100 mg bid was administered as continuous 28-day cycles until progression/ intolerable toxicity. Lack of a major response (MR) or partial response (PR) per Valent criteria by the end of 2 cycles resulted in discontinuation from the protocol. Result: Efficacy and safety data for all 26 pts (15 male: 11 female) are presented. The distribution of SM pts with one or more “C” findings included ASM (n=4), SM-CMML (n=14), SM-MDS (n=3), SM-MDS/MPN-U (n=1), and MCL (n=4, two with associated MDS). The median age of pts was 62 years (range 24–79 years), and the median # of prior therapies was 1.5 (range 0–4). Responses have been observed in 18/26 pts (69%), consisting of 10 pts (38%) with a MR (6 incomplete remissions and 4 pure clinical responses), 5 pts (19%) with a good partial response (GPR), and 3 pts with a minor PR . Four pts had stable disease, and 4 pts exhibited progressive disease (PD). In subjects with higher quality responses, responses have been durable, with PKC412 administered for a median of 19.5 cycles (1.5 years) for MR pts and 15 cycles (1.2 years) for MR+PR pts (range 4+ - 58+ cycles). Major responses have included normalization of hypoalbuminemia, improvement of hemoglobin and platelet counts, and resolution of liver function abnormalities. High quality responses have also included near complete resolution of pleural effusion and ascites (with reduction of paracentesis), and substantial reversion or normalization of weight loss (including one pt discontinuing TPN). Clinically meaningful responses have been accompanied by reduction of palpable and/or 3-D volumetric CT measurement of hepato/splenomegaly, a >50% decrease in the serum tryptase level and/or marrow mast cell (MC) burden, and improvement in mediator symptoms and ECOG performance status. Cutaneous mast cell lesions faded in 2 pts. One patient with MCL has achieved a near complete remission with RBC transfusion independence, normalization of albumin, disappearance of 18 cm palpable splenomegaly (70% volume reduction by imaging), decrease of serum tryptase from 763 to < 20 ng/mL, and decrease of marrow MC burden from 60–70% to 5%. Of particular interest, in 3 pts with SM-CMML (all D816V KIT+), associated marked eosinophilia normalized (e.g. decreased from 50% to 1% in one pt).The most common grade 1–2 non-hematologic toxicities were nausea and/or vomiting, and less frequently diarrhea and fatigue. Asymptomatic and reversible hyperlipasemia occurred in 5 pts (grade 3, n=1). Hematologic toxicity with a suspected relationship to PKC412 has included ≥ grade 3 worsening of pre-existing anemia, and in one pt, recurrent grade 3 thrombocytopenia despite dose reduction to 50 mg bid. Dose reduction was undertaken in 4 additional pts (N/V, n=2; HA, n=1; transient increase in pre-existing pleural effusion, n=1). Dose re-escalation to 100 mg bid was feasible in 3 of these 4 pts. As of August 5, 2010, 8 pts continue PKC412, and treatment has been discontinued in 18 pts. Among the latter, 2 pts had PKC412 discontinued after 4 cycles (grade 3 fatigue, grade 2 N/V, n=1 each), and 7 initial responders have terminated therapy for PD after 8–39 cycles (1 for progression of CMML). Allele-specific PCR detected D816V KIT in 18/26 (69%) pts, and a novel, activating two–amino acid insertion in MPL was identified in a D816V KIT-negative pt. A statistically significant association was observed between positivity for D816V KIT and achieving a MR versus any other type of response (p=0.0095, Fisher's exact test). Pharmacokinetic data and histopathologic correlates of response (e.g. marrow MC burden and serum tryptase levels) will be presented. Conclusion: PKC412 is well tolerated and exhibits clinically relevant and durable responses which compare very favorably to literature reports of interferon-alpha or cladribine in advanced SM. An ongoing international trial aims to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of PKC412 in this pt population. Disclosures: Gotlib: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. George:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Dutreix:Novartis: Employment. Gross:Novartis: Employment. Nikolova:Novartis: Employment. Graubert:Novartis: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Efficacy and Safety Of Three Bortezomib-Based Induction and Maintenance Regimens In Previously Untreated, Transplant-Ineligible Multiple Myeloma (MM) Patients (Pts): Final Results From The Randomized, Phase 3b, US Community-Based UPFRONT Study (NCT00507416)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.1966.1966 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 1966-1966 ◽

Cited By ~ 9

Author(s):

Ruben Niesvizky ◽

Ian Flinn ◽

Robert M. Rifkin ◽

James Essell ◽

Yousuf Gaffar ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Partial Response ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Sensitivity Analyses ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Community Based ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Mixed Effect ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Introduction The UPFRONT trial compared the efficacy and safety of three bortezomib (V)-based induction regimens – VD (V-dexamethasone), VTD (V-thalidomide-dexamethasone), and VMP (V-melphalan-prednisone) – followed by weekly V maintenance, in previously untreated, transplant-ineligible MM pts, and was the first to prospectively evaluate VD and VTD in this population. The trial was designed to best resemble ‘real-life' treatment practice in the US community oncology setting. Methods Pts with symptomatic, measurable MM were randomized 1:1:1 to receive eight 21-day cycles of VD, VTD, or VMP induction (VD: V 1.3 mg/m2, d 1, 4, 8, 11; D 20 mg, d 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12 [cycles 1–4]), d 1, 2, 4, 5 [cycles 5–8]); VTD: V as before; T 100 mg/day, d 1–21; D as before); VMP: V as before; M 9 mg/m2 and P 60 mg/m2, d 1–4 every other cycle), followed by 25 weeks (five 35-day cycles) of maintenance with weekly V 1.6 mg/m2, d 1, 8, 15, 22. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR, partial response or better [≥PR]), complete response (CR), near-CR (nCR), and very good partial response or better (≥VGPR) rates, duration of response (DOR), time to next therapy (TTNT), safety, and quality of life (QoL). Best confirmed responses were investigator-assessed per modified IMWG criteria. Adverse events (AEs) were graded by NCI-CTCAE v3.0. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used for time-to-event analyses; hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) are reported. QoL was assessed using the EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaire via a hand-held personal device. A linear mixed effect model was used to assess QoL changes over time within and between treatment arms; sensitivity analyses were conducted to test the robustness of the primary analysis. Here we report final results from the study, including updated PFS and OS, and previously unreported DOR and TTNT data for all 502 pts (VD, n=168; VTD, n=167; VMP, n=167) after a median follow-up of 42.7 months. Results Baseline characteristics were generally well balanced across arms. Pts median (range) age was 73 (38–91) years; 42% of pts were aged ≥75 years. 74%/17%/9% of pts were White/Black/Other and 73% had ISS stage II/III disease. 48% of pts had baseline comorbidities and 19% had a Charlson comorbidity index of ≥2; the most common comorbidities were diabetes mellitus (21%), renal disease (15%), and chronic pulmonary disease (8%). In the VD, VTD, and VMP arms, pts received a median (range) of 8 (1–13), 6 (1–13), and 7 (1–13) cycles, respectively; 50%, 38%, and 42% of pts received V maintenance. The mean V dose intensity (number of V doses received/number of V doses planned) for VD, VTD, and VMP was 72%, 63%, and 68% during induction and 75%, 81%, and 87% during maintenance. Median PFS was 14.7 (VD), 15.4 (VTD), and 17.3 (VMP) months, respectively, with no significant difference between arms (Figure). Median OS was 49.8 (VD), 51.5 (VTD), and 53.1 (VMP) months, respectively, with no significant difference between arms (VD–VTD: HR=1.03 [95% CI: 0.73, 1.46]; VD–VMP: HR=1.12 [95% CI: 0.80, 1.58]; VTD–VMP: HR=1.09 [95% CI: 0.77, 1.54]). For VD, VTD, and VMP, best confirmed ORRs during treatment were 73%, 80%, and 70%, including 30%, 40%, and 32% CR/nCR, and 37%, 51%, and 41% ≥VGPR, respectively. Median DOR was 18.3, 22.4, and 19.8 months, and median TTNT was 19.7, 24.5, and 19.0 months, respectively. Over 13 cycles, grade ≥3 AE rates were 78%, 87%, 83%; serious AE rates were 53%, 58%, 51%; and discontinuation rates due to AEs were 29%, 38%, 34%, respectively. Across arms, the most common grade ≥3 AEs were peripheral neuropathy (23%), fatigue (10%), and diarrhea (9%). V maintenance was associated with limited additional toxicity compared with induction. For QoL, the observed data, linear mixed model estimates, and sensitivity analyses all showed a common trend for decreasing mean global health status score during V-based induction (most notably for VTD), followed by a trend to stabilizing/improving score during single-agent V maintenance. Conclusions All three V-based regimens showed substantial activity in this community-based, elderly, comorbid pt population. PFS and OS were similar between the arms. Toxicities and QoL appeared less favorable with the triplet regimens, particularly VTD, than with the doublet. These data highlight the importance of V as a backbone of therapy and the need to adapt treatment for elderly pts. Disclosures: Niesvizky: Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Flinn:Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Rifkin:Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Neuwirth:Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company: Employment. Ba-Mancini:Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company: Employment. Zhu:Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company: Employment. Niculescu:Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company: Employment.

Download Full-text

Efficacy and Safety Of Ponatinib Following Failure Of Dasatinib In Patients (pts) With Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CP-CML) In The PACE Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.1498.1498 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 1498-1498 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Andreas Hochhaus ◽

Jorge E. Cortes ◽

Dong-Wook Kim ◽

Javier Pinilla-Ibarz ◽

Philipp D le Coutre ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Pleural Effusion ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Stock Options ◽

Research Funding ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Advisory Boards ◽

Group I ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Group D

Abstract Background The efficacy and safety of subsequent TKIs in pts who have experienced failure of dasatinib is not fully known. Ponatinib, a pan-BCR-ABL inhibitor, was evaluated in a phase 2, international, open-label clinical trial (PACE). This post-hoc analysis explored the efficacy and safety of ponatinib following failure of dasatinib in CP-CML pts in the PACE trial. Methods The PACE trial enrolled 449 pts, including 270 with CP-CML. Pts had to be resistant or intolerant to dasatinib or nilotinib, or they had to have the T315I mutation at baseline. The primary endpoint in CP-CML was major cytogenetic response (MCyR) at any time within 12 months after treatment initiation. The trial is ongoing. Data as of 1 April 2013 are reported, with a minimum follow-up of 18 months for pts remaining on study. The efficacy and safety of ponatinib (45 mg QD) in 107 CP-CML pts following failure of dasatinib as the most recent prior therapy, irrespective of other TKI therapy, is presented (Group D). Eighteen pts who experienced failure of dasatinib but received ≥1 anticancer therapy, other than hydroxyurea or anagrelide, prior to ponatinib treatment were excluded from the analyses. Data are also presented for 2 subsets of Group D: 52 pts whose only TKI therapy was imatinib followed by dasatinib (Group I-D), and 46 pts whose only TKI therapy was imatinib, then nilotinib, and then dasatinib (Group I-N-D). An analysis of cross-intolerance was also conducted in 69 pts with prior dasatinib treatment at any time who discontinued dasatinib due to intolerance. Results Baseline characteristics are shown in the table. Group I-D tended to be younger, with less time since diagnosis versus Group I-N-D. At the time of analysis, 60%, 65%, and 54% of pts in Groups D, I-D, and I-N-D remained on study. The most common reasons for discontinuation were adverse events (AEs; 16%, 15%, 17%) and progressive disease (9%, 6%, 11%) in Groups D, I-D, and I-N-D. Efficacy end points are shown in the table. In Group D, MCyR was seen in pts with the following dasatinib-resistant mutations at baseline: V299L, 3/4 (75%); T315I, 17/23 (74%); F317L, 3/10 (30%). The most common treatment-related AEs were thrombocytopenia (44%, 37%, 57%), rash (39%, 39%, 39%), and dry skin (39%, 29%, 52%) in Groups D, I-D, and I-N-D. Serious cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and peripheral vascular AEs occurred in 6%, 3%, and 3% of pts in Group D (treatment-related: 3%, 1%, 0%). Seventy-three of 217 pts receiving prior dasatinib at any time discontinued dasatinib due to intolerance. Of these 73 pts, 27 experienced the same AE(s) with ponatinib that led to dasatinib intolerance; 12 pts had grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia, 6 pts had other grade 3/4 AEs (3 with neutropenia, 1 each with pleural effusion, dyspnea, pulmonary hypertension), 8 pts had grade 1/2 AEs. Six of these 27 pts discontinued ponatinib due to the same AE that led to dasatinib intolerance. Thrombocytopenia was the primary AE involved in cross-intolerance (4 pts); congestive cardiac failure (grade 5) and pleural effusion each occurred once. Conclusions Ponatinib has substantial activity in pts with CP-CML following failure of dasatinib, with a safety profile reflective of this heavily pretreated population. Cross-intolerance between dasatinib and ponatinib was infrequent. Disclosures: Hochhaus: Ariad, Novartis, BMS, MSD, Pfizer: Research Funding; Novartis, BMS, Pfizer: Honoraria. Cortes:Ariad, Pfizer, Teva: Consultancy; Ariad, BMS, Novartis, Pfizer, Teva: Research Funding. Kim:BMS, Novartis,IL-Yang: Consultancy; BMS, Novartis, Pfizer,ARIAD,IL-Yang: Research Funding; BMS, Novartis,Pfizer,IL-Yang: Honoraria; BMS, Novartis,Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; BMS, Pfizer: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Pinilla-Ibarz:Novartis, Ariad: Research Funding; Novartis, Ariad, BMS and Pfizer: Speakers Bureau. le Coutre:Novartis: Research Funding; Novatis, BMS, Pfizer: Honoraria. Paquette:ARIAD, BMS, Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Chuah:Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Nicolini:Novartis, Ariad and Teva: Consultancy; Novartis & Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Novartis, BMS, Teva, Pfizer, Ariad: Honoraria; Novartis, BMS, Teva: Speakers Bureau; Novartis, Ariad, Teva, Pfizer: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Apperley:Novartis: Research Funding; Ariad, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Pfizer, Teva: Honoraria. Talpaz:Ariad, BMS, Sanofi, INCYTE: Research Funding; Ariad, Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Ariad, Sanofi, Novartis: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. DeAngelo:Araid, Novartis, BMS: Consultancy. Abruzzese:BMS, Novartis: Consultancy. Rea:BMS, Novartis, Pfizer, Ariad, Teva: Honoraria. Baccarani:Ariad, Novartis, BMS: Consultancy; Ariad, Novartis, BMS, Pfizer, Teva: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Müller:Novartis, BMS, Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis, BMS: Research Funding. Gambacorti-Passerini:Pfizer: Research Funding; Pfizer, BMS: Honoraria. Lustgarten:ARIAD: employees of and own stock/stock options in ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc Other, Employment. Rivera:ARIAD: Employment. Clackson:ARIAD: employees of and own stock/stock options in ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc Other, Employment. Turner:ARIAD: Employment. Haluska:ARIAD: employees of and own stock/stock options in ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc Other, Employment. Deininger:BMS, ARIAD, NOVARTIS: Consultancy; BMS, NOVARTIS, CELGENE, GILEAD: Research Funding; ARIAD, NOVARTIS: Advisory Boards, Advisory Boards Other. Hughes:Novartis, BMS, ARIAD: Honoraria, Research Funding. Goldman:Ariad: Honoraria. Shah:Ariad, Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kantarjian:RIAD, Novartis, BMS, Pfizer: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

"Real-Life" Data of the Efficacy and Safety of Belantamab Mafodotin in Relapsed Multiple Myeloma- the Mayo Clinic Experience

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-147925 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1639-1639

Author(s):

Iuliana Vaxman ◽

Jithma P. Abeykoon ◽

Angela Dispenzieri ◽

Shaji Kumar ◽

Francis K. Buadi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Clinical Trials ◽

Partial Response ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Randomized Clinical Trials ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Car T ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background: Treatment for multiple myeloma (MM) patients refractory to proteasome inhibitors (PIs), immunomodulatory agents (IMiDs), and monoclonal antibodies remains an unmet need. Belantamab mafodotin is a first in class antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) in MM utilizing a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting B cell maturation antigen (BCMA) conjugated to a microtubule-disrupting monomethyl auristatin F. The efficacy of belantamab in relapsed refractory MM (RRMM) patients has been reported in several randomized clinical trials. However, clinical trials have restricted patients' eligibilty. We report the "real world" efficacy and safety of belanatmab in patients treated at all three Mayo Clinic sites. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all consecutive MM patients that received at least one dose of belantamab outside a clinical trial. The primary endpoints were PFS and OS, and the secondary endpoints included overall response rates (ORR) and safety. Results: Thirty-seven RRMM patients were treated with belantamab between September 2020 and June 2021. The median age at diagnosis was 61 (range 37-83) and 64% were male. The median age at belantamab administration was 67 (IQR 59-74) and 14 patients (38%) were 70 years or older. Fifteen of 34 patients (44%) had high-risk FISH and 13 patients of 33 (39%) had ISS 3. Two patients had a creatinine of >2.5 mg/dL, and one patient was on dialysis. All three received full dose belantmab (2.5 mg/kg). The median time from diagnosis to belantamab initiation was 7 years (IQR 4-11), and the median prior lines of therapy was 8 (IQR 7-11). Twenty-seven patients (73%) underwent an autologous stem cell transplantation prior to belantamab therapy, and all patients were penta refractory (IMiD, PI, and anti CD38). Seven patients (19%) received CAR-T therapy prior to belantamab. The median number of belantamab doses administered was 3 (range 1-6). Thirty-one (84%) received belantamab monotherapy and 6 patients (16%) received belantamab in combination [pomalidomide (n=3), cyclophosphamide (n=2), or thalidomide (n=1)]. The overall response (ORR) rate to belantamab was 33% (out of 36 evaluable patients). Two patients (6%) achieved complete response (CR), 3 patients (8%) achieved very good partial response (VGPR), and 7 patients (19%) achieved partial response (PR). At data cutoff 20 patients (54%) are alive. Seventeen patients died of MM complications. The median follow-up was 6 months (IQR 3.5-7). The median PFS and OS for the whole cohort was 2 months (95% CI 1-3) and 7 months (95% CI 3--NR), respectively. Two patients died within the first cycle of belantamab (due to PD), and overall, 12 died within 100 days of belantamab therapy, all due to disease progression. Eleven patients (30%) were hospitalized during belantamab therapy. The reasons for hospitalization were related to MM in 4 patients (one patient with malignant ascites, one with hypercalcemia, 2 patients for pain management). Three patients were hospitalized due to thrombocytopenia (related to disease), and one due to an infusion-related reaction (IRR). Other reasons for hospitalization were infection (soft tissue abscess, n=1), proctitis (n=1) and tumor lysis (n=1). Keratopathy developed in 16 patients (43%). Keratopathy was grade 1 in 6 patients, grade 2 in 7 patients, and grade 3 in 3 patients. Only one patient had corneal erosions and 6 patients reported decreased visual acuity, (1 grade 3 keratopathy, 4 had grade 2 keratopathy, and 1 had grade 1 keratopathy). Two patients had IRR. Two patients reported gaining 3.5 kg each after therapy with belantamab was discontinued. Conclusions: The response rates are similar to those reported in randomized clinical trials. The role of belantamab in the era of other BCMA directed therapy (CAR-T, BiTEs) remains unclear. Disclosures Dispenzieri: Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Consultancy; Sorrento Therapeutics: Consultancy; Alnylam: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Kumar: Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Tenebio: Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Antengene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Adaptive: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Beigene: Consultancy; Astra-Zeneca: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Carsgen: Research Funding; KITE: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy; Roche-Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding. Dingli: Novartis: Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy; Apellis: Consultancy. Kapoor: Cellectar: Consultancy; BeiGene: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Ichnos Sciences: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Amgen: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Glaxo SmithKline: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding. Gertz: Akcea Therapeutics, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc, Prothena: Consultancy; Akcea Therapeutics, Ambry Genetics, Amgen Inc, Celgene Corporation, Janssen Biotech Inc, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Pfizer Inc (to Institution), Sanofi Genzyme: Honoraria; Ionis Pharmaceuticals: Other: Advisory Board; AbbVie Inc, Celgene Corporation: Other: Data Safetly & Monitoring; Aurora Biopharma: Other: Stock option.

Download Full-text

A Phase I Study of Bendamustine Combined with Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Patients with Refractory or Relapsed Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.1856.1856 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 1856-1856 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Suzanne Lentzsch ◽

Amy O’Sullivan ◽

Silvana Lalo ◽

Carrie Kruppa ◽

Diane Gardner ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Partial Response ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Dose Level ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Clinical Activity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 1856 Poster Board I-882 Background: Lenalidomide is an analog of thalidomide that has shown significant clinical activity in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM), both as a single agent and in combination with dexamethasone. Bendamustine is a bifunctional alkylating agent that is approved for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia and indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma that has progressed during or relapsed within 6 months following a rituximab-containing regimen. Bendamustine combined with lenalidomide may be an effective treatment option for MM patients, particularly those with preexisting or bortezomib-induced neuropathy. Our primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and safety profile of bendamustine and lenalidomide when administered with dexamethasone for patients with relapsed or refractory MM. Methods: Patients aged ≥18 years with confirmed, measurable stage 2 or 3 MM that was refractory to or progressed after 1 or more prior therapies, including lenalidomide, received bendamustine by intravenous infusion on days 1 and 2, oral lenalidomide on days 1–21, and oral dexamethasone on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of each 28-day cycle. Treatment was continued until a plateau of best response, as determined by the IBMTR/ABMTR, was reached. Study drug doses were escalated through 4 levels (Table), with 3–6 patients enrolled at each level depending on the rate of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). After determining the MTD, up to an additional 12 patients will be enrolled in an MTD expansion arm to better evaluate toxicity and clinical activity. Secondary endpoints included preliminary efficacy, as evidenced by objective response, time to disease progression, and overall survival. Results: To date, 11 patients have been enrolled, with a median age of 63 years (range, 38–75 years). The MTD of bendamustine and lenalidomide has not been identified at this point; currently, patients are enrolling on dose level 3 with 100 mg/m2 bendamustine and 10 mg lenalidomide. Thus far, DLT included 1 grade 4 neutropenia at dose level 2. Nine of 11 patients are currently eligible for response assessment. A partial response was observed in 67% of patients, including 1 very good partial response and 5 partial responses (PR). Two patients experienced stable disease and 1 exhibited progressive disease. Grade 3/4 adverse events included grade 3 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, hyperglycemia, and prolonged QTC, and 1 grade 4 neutropenia. Conclusions: Bendamustine, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone form a well-tolerated and highly active regimen even in heavily pretreated MM patients, with a PR rate of 67%. Additional updates on response and MTD will be available at the time of presentation. Disclosures: Lentzsch: Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Cephalon: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Bendamustine is not FDA approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma in the USA. Burt:Millennium: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Mapara:Resolvyx: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genzyme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gentium: Equity Ownership; Celgene: Spouse is consultant , has received research funding, and participates on advisory board; Cephalon: Spouse has received funding for clinical trial and participates on advisory board. Redner:Biogen: Equity Ownership; Wyeth: Equity Ownership; Glaxo-Smith-Kline: Equity Ownership; Pfizer: Equity Ownership; Genzyme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Roodman:Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy; Acceleron: Consultancy. Zonder:Amgen: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Cephalon: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy, Speaking (CME only); no promotional talks.

Download Full-text

Efficacy and Safety of Retreatment with Bortezomib in Patients with Multiple Myeloma: Interim Results From RETRIEVE, a Prospective International Phase 2 Study.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.3866.3866 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 3866-3866 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Maria Teresa Petrucci ◽

Igor W. Blau ◽

Paolo Corradini ◽

Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽

Johannes Drach ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Median Time ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Bortezomib Treatment ◽

Best Response ◽

Phase 2 Study ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 3866 Poster Board III-802 Bortezomib (Velcade®) retreatment has been shown to be active and well tolerated in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (MM) in a number of retrospective studies and a small prospective phase 4 study (EVEREST). This large, prospective, international, multi-center, open-label phase 2 study was conducted to confirm the efficacy and safety of retreatment with bortezomib in MM patients who had previously responded (at least partial response [PR]) to bortezomib-based therapy as their most recent prior treatment. Patients had to have previously tolerated bortezomib 1.0 or 1.3 mg/m2 alone or in combination and have had a treatment-free interval (TFI; time from last dose of initial bortezomib treatment to first dose of bortezomib retreatment) of ≥6 months. Additional eligibility criteria included progressive disease or relapse from complete response (CR) by EBMT criteria, no MM therapy (except maintenance with dexamethasone, thalidomide, or interferon) since the last dose of initial bortezomib treatment, KPS ≥60, and adequate renal, hepatic, and hematologic function; patients with grade ≥2 peripheral neuropathy or neuropathic pain (as defined by NCI CTCAE v3.0) were excluded. Patients received bortezomib at the last tolerated dose (1.0 or 1.3 mg/m2) during initial treatment on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 for up to eight 21-day cycles, either alone or in combination with dexamethasone at the investigator's discretion. Response was assessed by EBMT criteria every 6 weeks during treatment and then every 2 months until disease progression. Adverse events (AEs) were graded according to NCI CTCAE v3.0. A total of 130 patients received at least 1 dose of bortezomib retreatment and were included in the safety population. Patients had a median age of 67 years, 57% were male, and 16% had KPS '70%. Median time from diagnosis of MM was 4.5 years (range 0–14 years); median number of prior therapies was 2; 15, 80, 23, and 12 patients had received 1, 2, 3, and ≥4 prior lines of therapy (excluding initial bortezomib therapy). Best response by EBMT criteria to initial bortezomib treatment was CR in 26% and PR in 74% of patients; median time to progression and TFI after initial bortezomib treatment were 17.9 months and 14.3 months, respectively. Last tolerated dose of previous bortezomib therapy was 1.3 mg/m2 and 1.0 mg/m2 for 62% and 29% of patients, respectively; 9% received another dose. Patients received a median 7.0 (range 1–8) cycles of bortezomib retreatment (23% of patients completed all 8 cycles); 72% of patients received concomitant dexamethasone. A total of 126 patients were evaluable for response. In the 126 response-evaluable patients, the overall response rate (ORR; CR+PR) by best confirmed response (EBMT criteria) was 40%; in addition, 18% of patients achieved minimal response (MR), to give a CR+PR+MR rate of 58%. After a planned secondary efficacy analysis, the ORR (CR+PR) by single best response was 55% (75% ≥MR). Median time to best confirmed response (≥MR) was 2.9 months; time to first response was 1.5 months. Analysis of ORR by patient subgroups showed comparable results in patients who did versus did not receive concomitant dexamethasone (42% vs 32%), in those who received ≤1.0 mg/m2 vs 1.3 mg/m2 bortezomib (35% vs 41%), and in those aged ≤65 years vs >65 years (45% vs 36%). ORR was 67%, 39%, 33%, and 25% in patients who had received 1, 2, 3, and ≥4 prior lines of therapy (excluding initial bortezomib), respectively. Analysis of best confirmed responses according to response to initial bortezomib showed that 63% and 52% of patients who achieved a CR or PR, respectively, to initial bortezomib treatment responded to retreatment. Most (98%) patients experienced a treatment-emergent AE; 60% experienced a grade 3/4 AE, and 32% experienced a serious AE; there were 8 deaths, 2 of which (due to sepsis and stroke) were possibly treatment-related. The most common grade 3/4 AEs were thrombocytopenia (35%), neutropenia (7%), diarrhea (7%), and pneumonia (5%). AEs leading to dose reductions or discontinuations were reported for 22% and 12% of patients, respectively. The incidence of neuropathy was 39%, including 9% grade 3; 4% of patients discontinued treatment due to PN; 61% of neuropathy events resolved or improved within a median 1.3 months. These results confirm that bortezomib retreatment is a well-tolerated, feasible, and active therapeutic option for heavily pretreated MM patients without evidence of cumulative toxicity. Disclosures: Petrucci: Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Dimopoulos:Ortho-Biotech: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Honoraria. Drach:Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Blade:Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Johnson and Johnson: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Efficacy and Safety of Nilotinib in Elderly Patients with Imatinib-Resistant or -;Intolerant Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) in Chronic Phase (CP): A Sub-Analysis of the ENACT (Expanding Nilotinib Access in Clinical Trials) Study.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.3286.3286 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 3286-3286 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Philipp D. le Coutre ◽

Anna Turkina ◽

Dong-Wook Kim ◽

Bernadeta Ceglarek ◽

Giuliana Alimena ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Kinase Inhibitor ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Study Drug ◽

Cytogenetic Response ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Imatinib Resistant ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 3286 Poster Board III-1 Introduction: Nilotinib, a potent and highly selective BCR-ABL kinase inhibitor, is approved for the treatment of patients (pts) with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myelogeneous leukemia (Ph+ CML) in chronic phase (CML-CP) and accelerated phase (CML-AP) who are resistant or intolerant to prior therapy including imatinib. The ENACT study is a Phase IIIb, open-label, multicenter study that evaluated the efficacy and safety of nilotinib in adult pts with imatinib-resistant or intolerant CML in a clinical practice setting outside of a registration program. It is the largest single source of efficacy and safety information of any available tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) in CML, particularly among the elderly. Methods: The present is a sub-analysis of the ENACT study on the efficacy and safety of 400 mg twice daily nilotinib in elderly (aged =60 years) pts initiating treatment in CML-CP who were resistant and/or intolerant to imatinib. Results: Of the 1,422 CML-CP pts enrolled in the ENACT study between January 2006 and October 2008, 452 (32%) were elderly (=60 years) at study initiation and 165 (37%) of these pts were =70 years [10 (2%) were =80 years]. Countries that enrolled =20 elderly pts include France, Italy, USA, Germany, UK, Spain, Canada, and Brazil. At study initiation, elderly pts had longer median durations of CML (<60: 51.1 months; =60: 69.3; =70: 66.6) and higher proportions with CML duration >5 years (<60: 43%; =60: 56%; =70: 52%). Besides imatinib, prior CML treatments received by elderly pts included dasatinib (=60: 20%; =70: 19%), cytarabine (=60: 23%; =70: 19%), busulfan (=60: 10%; =70: 7%), and interferons (=60: 50%; =70: 42%). Elderly pts were previously treated with imatinib for longer median durations (<60: 27.4 months; =60: 32.7; =70: 29.9), with higher proportions treated for >5 years (<60: 12%; =60: 19%; =70: 18%). The proportion of imatinib-intolerant to resistant elderly pts was about 1:1, which was higher than the proportion among <60 pts at about 0.6:1, such that relatively few elderly pts had prior highest imatinib dose >800 mg (<60: 34%; =60: 26%; =70: 21%). While response rates to prior imatinib were similar, among pts who required therapy after failing imatinib, elderly pts had lower cytogenetic response rates (<60: 22%; =60: 17%; =70: 19%) to prior dasatinib. During ENACT, less than 50% of elderly pts experienced nilotinib dose interruptions (=60: 46%; =70: 41%) and reductions (=60: 7%; =70: 6%) lasting >5 days, which was consistent with the overall ENACT dataset. The median duration of dose interruptions and reductions was 15 (=70: also 15) and 41 (=70: 32) days, respectively. The main reason for dose interruptions and reductions was adverse events (AEs). The median duration of nilotinib exposure was 227 days (=70: 219) and the median dose intensity was 749 mg/day (=70: 775). Efficacy was similar among elderly pts, with 39% (=70: 35%) of pts achieving complete hematologic response (CHR), 41% (=70: 39%) achieving major cytogenetic response (MCyR) and 31% (=70: 33%) achieving complete cytogenetic response (CCyR). MCyR rate was also similar among elderly hematologic responders (=60: 64%; =70: 65%). Among elderly pts requiring nilotinib therapy after both imatinib and dasatinib, and therefore have more resistant CML, CHR rate was 39% (=70: 32%), MCyR rate was 28% (=70: 29%) and CCyR rate was 20% (=70: 16%). Safety was likewise similar among elderly pts, with grade 3/4 study drug-related AEs occurring in 56% of pts (=70: 53%). The most frequent of these AEs were thrombocytopenia (=60: 24%; =70: 21%) and neutropenia (=60: 14%; =70: 11%). The most common method of managing these AEs was brief dose interruptions and/or reductions [thrombocytopenia (=60:86/108 pts; =70: 30/35), neutropenia (=60: 42/62 pts; =70: 9/18)]. Among elderly pts with prior dasatinib, 53% (=70: 58%) experienced grade 3/4 study drug-related AEs, while 7 out of 8 pts with pleural effusion on dasatinib no longer had it on nilotinib. Conclusions: In ENACT, pts aged =60 years at study initiation appear to have longer durations of CML, be more heavily pre-treated and more intolerant to imatinib than the younger cohort. Nonetheless, nilotinib induced comparable clinical responses in CML-CP pts regardless of age. Importantly, the safety profile of nilotinib is maintained in elderly pts. Disclosures: le Coutre: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria. Turkina:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Kim:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Wyeth: Research Funding. Ceglarek:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Shen:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Smith:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Rizzieri:Novartis Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Szczudlo:Novartis: Employment. Berton:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Wang:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Wang:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Nicolini:Novartis Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Chemgenex: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

KIT Inhibitor Midostaurin in Patients with Advanced Systemic Mastocytosis: Results of a Planned Interim Analysis of the Global CPKC412D2201 Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.799.799 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 799-799 ◽

Cited By ~ 15

Author(s):

Jason Gotlib ◽

Hanneke C. Kluin-Nelemans ◽

Tracy I. George ◽

Cem Akin ◽

Karl Sotlar ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Mast Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Null Hypothesis ◽

Systemic Mastocytosis ◽

Extension Phase ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Stage 1 ◽

Median Change ◽

Kit D816v

Abstract Abstract 799 Background: Aggressive systemic mastocytosis (ASM) and mast cell leukemia (MCL) with or without an associated clonal hematologic non-mast cell lineage disease (AHNMD) are myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) with inadequate treatment options. The activating KIT D816V mutation occurs in ≈80% of patients (pts) with these advanced forms of SM and is central to disease pathogenesis. Midostaurin is an oral inhibitor of multiple tyrosine kinases, including wild-type and D816-mutated KIT. Promising results of an investigator-initiated trial (Gotlib et al. Blood. 2010;116:316) led to initiation of this multicenter phase 2 study (NCT00782067) of midostaurin in pts with advanced SM. Here, we report the efficacy and preliminary safety results of stage 1 of this trial. Methods: Midostaurin (100 mg BID) was administered continuously in 28-d cycles until progression or intolerable toxicity. Enrollment into an extension phase was permitted if the null hypothesis of an overall response rate (ORR) ≤ 30% was rejected per Fleming 2-stage design. Pts were required to have ≥ 1 measurable C-finding(s) (CF; eg, cytopenias, liver dysfunction) considered related to SM. The primary endpoint was ORR (major response [MR] + partial response [PR] according to Valent criteria) occurring in the first 6 cycles and maintained for ≥ 8 weeks (wk). International Working Group criteria for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS; with slight modifications) were used to evaluate changes in transfusion dependence. Results: 62 pts were enrolled in stage 1, of whom 40 (65%) were eligible for efficacy evaluation. Reasons for ineligibility included absence of measurable CF (n = 11) or CF considered unrelated to SM (n = 11). Median age of eligible pts (25 males, 63%) was 64.5 y (range: 48–80 y). 33 (83%) pts had ASM (27 with an AHNMD) and 7 (18%) had MCL (3 with an AHNMD). AHNMDs (n=30) included 10 chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), 10 MDS/MPN-unclassified (MDS/MPN-u), 4 hypereosinophilic syndrome/chronic eosinophilic leukemia (HES/CEL), and 6 other subtypes. 22 (55%) pts received at least 1 prior therapy (median: 1.5; range: 1–4). 28 (70%) pts were KIT D816V/Y–positive, 3 (8%) were KIT D816V/Y–negative, and 9 (23%) were not evaluable for mutation status. The ORR was 60% (24/40), and most responses were MRs (21/24; Table). With a median follow-up of 27 months (mo), the median duration of response and median overall survival (OS) have not been reached. Of the 7 pts with MCL, 4 (57%) achieved an MR, including 3 ongoing incomplete remissions (IR) (19+ mo in 2 pts and 32+ mo in 1 pt). The OS in MCL pts was 22.6 mo. Additionally, 3 of 4 responding ASM/MCL-HES/CEL pts exhibited resolution of blood eosinophilia (mean baseline % and absolute eosinophils: 64% and 15.6 × 109/L). Median change in serum tryptase level among the 40 pts was −61% (range: −97% to 16%), with 16 (40%) pts exhibiting a ' 50% reduction lasting ≥ 8 wk. Median change in marrow mast cell (MC) burden in 32 evaluable pts was −41% (range: −92% to 83%), with 15/32 (47%) pts exhibiting a ≥ 50% reduction. All 62 pts received at least 1 dose of midostaurin and were included in the safety analysis. Grade 3/4 hematologic adverse events (AEs) considered drug-related were neutropenia (11%), anemia (3%), and thrombocytopenia (3%). The most common grade 3/4 drug-related non-hematologic AEs were fatigue (6%), nausea (6%), vomiting (5%), diarrhea (5%), and increased lipase (5%). As of March 15, 2012, therapy was discontinued in 26/40 pts: 7 for AEs (5 drug-related), 12 for disease progression, and 7 for other reasons. 3 of 30 pts with an AHNMD (2 CMML and 1 MDS/MPN-u) developed AML. Conclusion: In advanced SM pts, midostaurin was well tolerated and demonstrated a high rate of durable responses, including in MCL, which historically has a dire prognosis. The drug can produce significant reductions in MC burden, indicating the potential for disease modification. The stage 1 ORR was sufficient to reject the null hypothesis and permitted enrollment in the extension phase, where full accrual of 116 pts has been completed. Disclosures: Gotlib: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. George:Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Akin:Novartis: Consultancy. Sotlar:Novartis: Consultancy. Awan:Allos Therapeutics: Speakers Bureau. Morariu:Novartis: Employment. Squier:Novartis: Employment. Villeneuve:Novartis: Employment. Emery-Salbert:Novartis: Employment. Horny:Novartis: Consultancy. Valent:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Reiter:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Clapd (Clarithromycin, Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone) Therapy In Relapsed Or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.1955.1955 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 1955-1955 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

Tomer M Mark ◽

Angelique Boyer ◽

Adriana C Rossi ◽

Dennis Kwon ◽

Roger N Pearse ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Partial Response ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Complete Response ◽

Response Analysis ◽

Muscular Weakness ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Disease Response ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background Pomalidomide is a distinct IMiD® immunomodulatory agent with activity in subjects with relapsed or refractory MM (RRMM), including those with prior lenalidomide treatment. We have previously reported that the addition of clarithromycin enhances the anti-myeloma activity of pomalidomide+dexamethasone (Pom/Dex) in the treatment of RRMM (Mark et al, ASH 2012). We now report updated results with extended follow up from a phase 2 trial of large group of patients treated with ClaPd in RRMM. Methods One hundred nineteen patients with heavily pretreated RRMM were enrolled into a single-institution study to investigate the effectiveness and tolerability of ClaPd. Eligible subjects had at least 3 prior lines of therapy, one line of which must have included lenalidomide. ClaPd is clarithromycin 500mg twice daily; pomalidomide 4mg for days 1-21, and dexamethasone 40mg on days 1,8,15,22 of a 28-day cycle. All subjects had thromboprophylaxis with 81mg aspirin daily. Disease response evaluation was performed monthly with immunoelectrophoresis and free light chain analysis; bone marrow biopsy with skeletal imaging was used to confirm MM progression or complete response (CR). Treatment was continued as tolerated by the patient until disease progression. Results One hundred fourteen patients had completed at least 1 cycle of ClaPd and were eligible for disease response analysis at data cut-off. All patients were included in the safety analysis. Patients had undergone a median of 5 (range 3-15) prior lines of therapy. The proportion of patients who were refractory to lenalidomide, refractory to bortezomib, and double (lenalidomide+bortezomib) refractory were 85%, 79%, and 68% respectively. The median number of ClaPd cycles received was 7 (range 1-34). Overall response rate (ORR, ≥PR, entire cohort/double-refractory subgroup) was 61.4/56.4% [stringent complete remission (sCR): 4.4/4%, complete response (CR): 0.9/1.3%, very good partial response (VGPR): 14.9/11.5%, partial response (PR): 41.2/38.5%, minimal response (MR): 7/9%, stable disease (SD): 21.9/21.8%, progressive disease (PD): 9.6/12.8%, ³VGPR rate of 20.2/16.7%]. Clinical benefit (³ MR) was achieved in 68.4/65.4%. Median time to PR and maximum response was 1 (range 1-7) and 2 (range 1-18) cycles, respectively. After a mean follow up time of 11.9 months, 40 patients (34%) remain free from progression, with a median progression free survival of 8.1 months (95% CI: 5.1, 9.8). Median duration of response (DOR) was 9.3 months (95% CI: 7.2,16.1). Median overall survival (OS) has not been reached with 68 patients (57%) alive at last follow-up. Median PFS, DOR, OS were not significantly different in the double-refractory subgroup at 6.3 (CI 4.7, 8.7; p = 0.21), 8.6 (CI 6.5, 16.1; p = 0.87), and 16.8 months (CI 12.4, 28.7; p = 0.11) respectively. The most common (³% grade 3 and 4 toxicities were: neutropenia (49%), thrombocytopenia (39%), anemia (27%), pneumonia (10%), fatigue 8%, and muscular weakness 7%. Febrile neutropenia was uncommon at 2%. There were 6 cases of lower extremity venous thrombosis (5%, 1 grade 1, 4 grade 2, 1 grade 3) and no instances of pulmonary embolism. Mild peripheral neuropathy was present in 32% (19% grade 1, 13% grade 2), 0% grade 3 or 4). Grade 2 congestive heart failure, due to dexamethasone, emerged in 1 subject (0.8%). Four patients (3.3%) withdrew due to treatment related toxicity (1 with Grade 3 muscular weakness, 2 due to Grade 3 fatigue, 1 grade 4 neutropenic sepsis). There was no treatment related mortality. Conclusions ClaPd is a highly effective and tolerable regimen for heavily treated RRMM that has progressed after prior treatments. Response to ClaPd is rapid and sustained at > 8 months in the majority of subjects. The presence of double refractory disease did not significantly impact clinical outcomes. The ORR and PFS compare favorably and toxicity profile is similar to other published reports of Pom/Dex. Disclosures: Mark: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Rossi:Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Zafar:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Speakers Bureau. Pekle:Millennium: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Niesvizky:Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

A 3-Part, Phase 2 Study of Bezuclastinib (CGT9486), an Oral, Selective, and Potent KIT D816V Inhibitor, in Adult Patients with Nonadvanced Systemic Mastocytosis (NonAdvSM)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-147072 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3642-3642

Author(s):

Frank Siebenhaar ◽

Jason Gotlib ◽

Michael W. Deininger ◽

Daniel J. DeAngelo ◽

Francis Payumo ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Mast Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Systemic Mastocytosis ◽

Symptom Burden ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Management Committee ◽

Study Management ◽

Kit D816v

Abstract Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is characterized by mast cell infiltration of ≥ 1 extracutaneous organs and encompasses a spectrum of diagnoses that can range from a non-advanced to advanced disease (Shomali et al, 2018). There are two nonadvanced variants of SM: indolent systemic mastocytosis (ISM), which accounts for approximately 85% and smoldering systemic mastocytosis (SSM), which includes about 5% of the general SM population (Cohen et al, 2014, Jennings et al, 2014). ISM is characterized by 0 or 1 B-findings and SSM by 2 or more B findings and absence of organ damage or an associated hematologic neoplasm (Gotlib et al, 2018). There are currently no approved therapies to treat the underlying disease of ISM or SSM. Although anti-mediator therapies (e.g. anti-H1 and H2 antihistamines, leukotriene receptor antagonists, cromolyn sodium, corticosteroids) are used to control symptoms such as anaphylaxis, GI intolerance, and flushing to improve quality of life, their effectiveness and tolerability are variable. Many patients experience a persistently high symptom burden despite maximized anti-mediator therapies. Because the molecular pathogenesis of SM is driven by KIT D816V mutations in 95% of patients (Garcia-Montero et al, 2006, Jara-Acevedo et al, 2015, Vaes et al, 2017), other agents targeting this mutated kinase have been used to treat the spectrum of SM variants; however, toxicities such as cognitive impairment, GI effects, intracranial hemorrhage, and edema may limit dosing and thus efficacy. In addition to targeting KIT D816V, bezuclastinib was designed to avoid other closely related kinases with known liabilities, such as PDGFRα, PDGFRβ, wild-type KIT, VEGFR2 (KDR), and CSF1R (FMS). Furthermore, bezuclastinib has demonstrated minimal brain penetration and no CNS toxicities have been identified in preclinical studies. Preliminary clinical activity with bezuclastinib has been observed in patients with advanced solid tumors or locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). A reduction in KIT exon 17 mutational burden was observed in patients treated with bezuclastinib. This reduction was temporally associated with a reduction in tumor burden supporting bezuclastinib as an active therapy in KIT-driven diseases (Wagner et al, 2018). This is a multi-center, Phase 2, double blind, placebo-controlled, 3-part clinical study to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and biomarker correlates (e.g. bone marrow mast cell percentage, serum tryptase level, and KIT D816V mutation burden) of the KIT inhibitor bezuclastinib in patients with ISM and SSM. This study will enroll patients with SSM and moderate-to-severe ISM who have inadequate control of their symptoms despite at least 2 anti-mediator treatments. Part 1 of the study is intended to determine the recommended dose of bezuclastinib in Part 2. Subjects will be randomized to placebo or 1 of 3 doses of bezuclastinib which will be administered in combination with a baseline regimen of best supportive care (BSC). Part 2 will evaluate the efficacy of bezuclastinib at the selected dose as compared with placebo. Efficacy will be measured by the reduction of symptom burden as assessed by the mastocytosis activity score (MAS), a disease specific patient reported outcome tool (Siebenhaar et al, 2018). In Part 3, patients who have completed treatment in Part 1 or Part 2 of the study, including those initially randomized to placebo, may participate in a long-term extension and receive open-label bezuclastinib in combination with BSC. The study will enroll approximately 138 subjects. Data from this study will support further development of bezuclastinib in SM. Disclosures Gotlib: Cogent Biosciences: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Chair for the Eligibility and Central Response Review Committee, Research Funding; PharmaEssentia: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kartos: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Deciphera: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Allakos: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Blueprint Medicines: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Deininger: Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; SPARC, DisperSol, Leukemia & Lymphoma Society: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Part of a Study Management Committee, Research Funding; Blueprint Medicines Corporation: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Part of a Study Management Committee, Research Funding; Fusion Pharma, Medscape, DisperSol: Consultancy; Sangamo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. DeAngelo: Incyte: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Servier: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Abbvie: Research Funding; Forty-Seven: Consultancy; Autolus: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Blueprint: Research Funding; Glycomimetrics: Research Funding. Payumo: Cogent Biosciences, Inc: Current Employment. Mensing: Cogent Biosciences, Inc.: Current Employment. Jolin: Cogent Biosciences: Current Employment. Sachs: Cogent Biosciences: Current Employment. George: Bristol Meyers Squibb: Consultancy; Blueprint Medicines: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Incyte Corporation: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: study of investigational agent

Download Full-text

Efficacy and Safety of Ibrutinib in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia or Small Lymphocytic Leukemia with 17p Deletion: Results from the Phase II RESONATE™-17 Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.327.327 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 327-327 ◽

Cited By ~ 27

Author(s):

Susan O'Brien ◽

Jeffrey A. Jones ◽

Steven Coutre ◽

Anthony R. Mato ◽

Peter Hillmen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Complete Response ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Previously Treated ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background: Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) with deletion of the short arm of chromosome 17 (del 17p) follow an aggressive clinical course and demonstrate a median survival of less than 2 years in the relapsed/refractory (R/R) setting. Ibrutinib (ImbruvicaTM), a first-in-class Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, has been approved for previously treated patients with CLL and for patients with del 17p CLL. We report results from the primary analysis of the Phase II RESONATETM-17 (PCYC-1117-CA) study, designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of single-agent ibrutinib for treatment of patients with R/R del 17p CLL or small lymphocytic leukemia (SLL). Methods: Patients with del 17p CLL or SLL who failed at least one therapy were enrolled to receive 420 mg oral ibrutinib once daily until progression. All patients receiving at least one dose of ibrutinib were included in the analysis. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) per an independent review committee (IRC). Other endpoints included duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety of ibrutinib. Results: Among 144 treated patients (137 with CLL, 7 with SLL), the median age was 64 (48% 65 years or older) and all had del 17p. Baseline characteristics included 63% of patients with Rai Stage III or IV disease, 49% with bulky lymphadenopathy of at least 5 cm, and 10% with lymphadenopathy of least 10 cm. The median baseline absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) was 32.9 x 109/L with 57% of patients with a baseline ALC at least 25.0 x 109/L. Baseline beta-2 microglobulin levels were at least 3.5 mg/L in 78% of patients (range 1.8-19.8 mg/L), and lactate dehydrogenase levels were at least 350 U/L in 24% of patients (range 127-1979 U/L). A median of 2 prior therapies (range 1-7) was reported. Investigator-assessed ORR was 82.6% including 17.4% partial response with lymphocytosis (PR-L). Complete response (CR)/complete response with incomplete bone marrow recovery (CRi) were reported in 3 patients. IRC-assessed ORR is pending. At a median follow up of 13.0 months (range 0.5-16.7 months), the median PFS (Figure 1) and DOR by investigator determination had not been reached. At 12 months, 79.3% were alive and progression-free, and 88.3% of responders were progression-free. Progressive disease was reported in 20 patients (13.9%). Richter transformation was reported in 11 of these patients (7.6%), 7 of the cases occurring within the first 24 weeks of treatment. Prolymphocytic leukemia was reported in 1 patient. The most frequently reported adverse events (AE) of any grade were diarrhea (36%; 2% Grade 3-4), fatigue (30%; 1% Grade 3-4), cough (24%; 1% Grade 3-4), and arthralgia (22%; 1% Grade 3-4). Atrial fibrillation of any grade was reported in 11 patients (7.6%; 3.5% Grade 3-4). Seven patients reported basal or squamous cell skin cancer and 1 patient had plasma cell myeloma. Most frequently reported Grade 3-4 AEs were neutropenia (14%), anemia (8%), pneumonia (8%), and hypertension (8%). Major hemorrhage was reported in 7 patients (4.9%, all Grade 2 or 3). Study treatment was discontinued in 16 patients (11.1%) due to AEs with 8 eventually having fatal events (pneumonia, sepsis, myocardial or renal infarction, health deterioration). At the time of data cut, the median treatment duration was 11.1 months, and 101 of 144 patients (70%) continued treatment with ibrutinib. Conclusions: In the largest prospective trial dedicated to the study of del 17p CLL/SLL, ibrutinib demonstrated marked efficacy in terms of ORR, DOR, and PFS, with a favorable risk-benefit profile. At a median follow up of 13 months, the median DOR had not yet been reached; 79.3% of patients remained progression-free at 12 months, consistent with efficacy observed in earlier studies (Byrd, NEJM 2013;369:32-42). The PFS in this previously treated population compares favorably to that of treatment-naïve del 17p CLL patients receiving fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR) (Hallek, Lancet 2010;376:1164-74) or alemtuzumab (Hillmen, J Clin Oncol 2007;10:5616-23) with median PFS of 11 months. The AEs are consistent with those previously reported for ibrutinib (Byrd, NEJM 2014;371:213-23). These results support ibrutinib as an effective therapy for patients with del 17p CLL/SLL. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures O'Brien: Amgen, Celgene, GSK: Consultancy; CLL Global Research Foundation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Emergent, Genentech, Gilead, Infinity, Pharmacyclics, Spectrum: Consultancy, Research Funding; MorphoSys, Acerta, TG Therapeutics: Research Funding. Jones:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Coutre:Janssen, Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding. Mato:Pharamcyclics, Genentech, Celegene, Millennium : Speakers Bureau. Hillmen:Pharmacyclics, Janssen, Gilead, Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding. Tam:Pharmacyclics and Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Siddiqi:Janssen: Speakers Bureau. Furman:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Brown:Sanofi, Onyx, Vertex, Novartis, Boehringer, GSK, Roche/Genentech, Emergent, Morphosys, Celgene, Janssen, Pharmacyclics, Gilead: Consultancy. Stevens-Brogan:Pharmacyclics: Employment. Li:Pharmacyclics: Employment. Fardis:Pharmacyclics: Employment. Clow:Pharmacyclics: Employment. James:Pharmacyclics: Employment. Chu:Pharmacyclics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hallek:Janssen, Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Stilgenbauer:Pharmacyclics, Janssen Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text