The Role of Novel Agents on Reversibility of Renal Impairment in Newly Diagnosed Patients with Multiple Myeloma; a Single Center Experience on 112 Patients,

Abstract Abstract 3961 Renal impairment (RI) is a frequent complication of multiple myeloma (MM). Proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) are used as frontline therapy for MM but their effect on renal function recovery has not been clearly defined. To address this issue we studied 112 patients with newly diagnosed MM and RI who were treated in the Department of Clinical Therapeutics of the University of Athens, over the last decade. RI was defined as an estimated glomelural filtration rate (eGFR) ≤60 ml/min, using the simplified MDRD formula. Patients were divided into three groups; group T included 53 patients who received thalidomide-based regimens (with dexamethasone alone, with dexamethasone and melphalan or cyclophosphamide, or with VAD); group B included 30 patients who received bortezomib-based regimens (with dexamethasone alone, with dexamethasone and thalidomide or with cyclophosphamide) and group L included 29 patients who received lenalidomide-based regimens (with dexamethasone or with melphalan and prednisone). Lenalidomide dose was adjusted for the degree of RI according to current recommendations. Renal complete response (CRrenal) was defined as a sustained increase of baseline eGFR to >60 ml/min, renal partial response (PRrenal) as an increase of eGFR from <15 to 30–50 ml/min and renal minor response (MRrenal) as sustained improvement of baseline eGFR of <15 ml/min to 15–29 ml/min, or, if baseline eGFR was 15–29 ml/min, improvement to 30–59 ml/min. Patients in groups T and L were older than those of group B (p=0.0001). Anemia (Hb <10 g/dl) was more frequent in patients of group L (p=0.007). There were no significant differences in the severity of RI, or other clinical and laboratory parameters among the three groups. An improvement of renal function, recorded as MRrenal or better, was achieved more frequently in patients treated with bortezomib-(83%) or thalidomide-based regimens (77%) than in patients treated with lenalidomide-based regimens (55%, p=0.033). We subsequently focused our analysis in major renal responses (at least PRrenal) since this endpoint is clinically more relevant. CRrenal was achieved in 53% of patients in group T, in 70% in group B and in 34% in group L (p=0.014), while CRrenal+PRrenal rates were 55%, 80% and 38% for groups T, B and L, respectively (p=0.004). eGFR <30 ml/min was associated with a significantly lower probability of at least PRrenal (p=0.016). In multivariate analysis bortezomib-based regimens (OR: 8.8, 95% CI: 2–37, p=0.003) and thalidomide-based regimens (OR: 2.85, 95% CI: 1.01–8, p=0.046) were associated with higher probability at least PRrenal than lenalidomide-based regimens. Other factors that were independently associated with higher probability of at least PRrenal, were baseline eGFR >30 ml/min (OR: 4.85, 95% CI: 1.9–12.5, p=0.001) and age ≤65 years (OR: 3.8, 95% CI: 1.07–13.5, p=0.038). The median time to first renal response was longer for patients of group L compared to those of group T (5.5 months vs. 1.5 months, p=0.038) and it was significantly shorter for patients of group B (0.85 months, p=0.001). The median time to major renal response was 1.1 months for bortezomib-based and 2.7 months for thalidomide-based regimens, and exceeds 6 months for lenalidomide-based regimens (p=0.002). In multivariate analysis bortezomib-based regimens (OR: 3.12, 95% CI: 1.35–7.2, p=0.008) and baseline eGFR >30 ml/min (OR: 1.93, 95% CI: 1.13–3.3, p=0.015) were independently associated with a shorter time to ≥PRrenal. Myeloma response to treatment was 61%, 83% and 83% for the three treatment groups, respectively and was associated with any renal response (≥MRrenal; p=0.008) and with a major renal response (CRrenal+PRrenal; p=0.001). Among 8 patients who required dialysis (group T 4 patients, group B 4 patients), 4 patients (2 in each group) became independent of this procedure. This is the first analysis which compared the role of the three novel agents in MM patients presenting with RI. Our data indicate that novel agent-based regimens can improve renal function in the majority of patients with RI. However, bortezomib- and thalidomide-based regimens are more efficacious than lenalidomide-based regimens in this setting. Furthermore, bortezomib-based regimens act more rapidly than IMiD-based regimens even in patients with severe RI. We conclude that bortezomib-based regimens are the preferred therapy for newly diagnosed myeloma patients with RI. Disclosures: Dimopoulos: Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Millenium: Honoraria. Terpos:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Reversibility of Renal Failure in Newly Diagnosed Patients with Multiple Myeloma and the Role of Novel Agents.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.955.955 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 955-955 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Maria Roussou ◽

Efstathios Kastritis ◽

Dimitrios Christoulas ◽

Magdalini Migkou ◽

Maria Gavriatopoulou ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Renal Function ◽

Renal Impairment ◽

High Dose ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Agent Based ◽

Renal Response ◽

Group A ◽

Group B ◽

Novel Agent

Abstract Abstract 955 Renal impairment (RI) is a common complication of multiple myeloma (MM) and is associated with increased mortality. High dose dexamethasone-based regimens have been extensively used for the initial management of patients with MM presenting with RI. Recently, novel agent-based regimens have been introduced in the frontline management of MM. The purpose of our analysis was to assess the effect of novel agent-based regimens on the rate of RI improvement and compare their efficacy with conventional chemotherapy (CC) plus dexamethasone (Dexa) in newly diagnosed MM patients. Over the last decade, 82 patients with newly diagnosed MM and RI, defined as creatinine clearance (CrCI) <50ml/min, received frontline treatment in our Center. Patients were divided into three groups: group A: 28 patients who received CC plus Dexa-based regimens (VAD, VAD-like regimens, melphalan plus Dexa); group B: 38 patients who received IMiDs-based regimens (thalidomide or lenalidomide with high dose Dexa and/or cyclophosphamide or melphalan) and group C: 16 patients who received bortezomib-based regimens with Dexa. Renal complete response (RCR) was defined as a sustained increase of baseline CrCI to >60ml/min. Renal partial response (RPR) was defined as an increase of CrCI from<15 to 30-50ml/min. Renal minor response (RMR) was defined as sustained improvement of baseline CrCI of<15ml/min to 15-29 ml/min, or, if baseline CrCI was 15-29 ml/min, improvement to 30-59 ml/min. Patients in group B were older than those of groups A and C (p=0.01) while more patient in group C had light chain only MM than in groups A and B (p=0.04). There were no significant differences in the severity of RI, Bence Jones proteinuria, hypercalcemia or ISS stage among the three groups. Improvement of renal function, recorded as RMR or better, was achieved more frequently in patients treated with novel agents (group B: 87% and in group C: 94%) than in patients treated with CC plus Dexa-based regimens (64%, p=0.024). Among 9 patients who required renal dialysis 3 became independent of this procedure after treatment. We subsequently focused our analysis in major renal responses (RPR or RCR), because this endpoint is clinically more relevant. RCR was achieved in 43% of patients in group A, in 50% in group B and in 69% of patients in group C (p=0.2) and RCR+RPR rates were 50% and 57% and 81% for groups A, B and C respectively (p=0.1). Creatinine clearance <30 ml/min was associated with a significantly lower probability of RCR or RPR only in patients treated with CC plus Dexa- or with IMiDs-based regimens (p<0.01), but not in patients treated with bortezomib (p=0.529). The probability of RPR+RCR was similar for patients treated with IMiDs compared to CC plus Dexa-based regimens (p=0.619). In multivariate analysis bortezomib–based regimens (p=0.02, OR: 7, 95% CI 1.5-25) and CrCl>30 ml/min (p=0.002, OR: 6.1, 95% CI 2.5-22.5) were independently associated with a higher probability of RCR+RPR. The median time to RPR was similar for patients treated with IMiDs compared to CC plus Dexa-based regimens (2.2 months for Group A, 1.5 months for Group B, p=0.587) but it was significantly shorter for Group C (0.7 months, p=0.017). Other factors associated with a shorter time to ≥RPR included CrCl>30 ml/min (p=0.039) and age<75 (p=0.089). In multivariate analysis bortezomib–based regimens (p=0.004, OR: 3 95% CI 1.6-6.7) and CrCl>30 ml/min (p=0.006, OR: 2.5 95% CI 1.3-4.5) were independently associated with a shorter time to ≥RPR. In landmark analysis (time was one month in order to reduce bias due to early deaths), rapid improvement of renal function (≤1 month) was associated with a trend for a longer survival compared to patients who achieved renal response later (>1 month) (47 vs. 21 months, p=0.19). Myeloma response to treatment was 58%, 68% and 79% for the three treatment groups respectively and was associated with renal response (p=0.024), though less strongly with a major renal response (p=0.061). Our data indicate that novel agent-based regimens can improve renal function in most patients; furthermore bortezomib-based regimens improve renal function to a higher degree and significantly more rapidly than CC plus Dexa-based or IMiD-based regimens even in patients with severe renal impairment. We conclude that bortezomib-based regimens may be the preferred treatment for newly diagnosed myeloma patients who present with renal impairment. Disclosures: Dimopoulos: JANSSEN-CILAG: Honoraria; CELGENE: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Improvement in Renal Function and Its Impact on Survival in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.3368.3368 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 3368-3368

Author(s):

Wilson I Gonsalves ◽

Nelson Leung ◽

S. Vincent Rajkumar ◽

Angela Dispenzieri ◽

Francis Buadi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Renal Function ◽

High Risk ◽

Renal Impairment ◽

Induction Therapy ◽

Response To Therapy ◽

Older Age ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Renal Response ◽

Novel Agent

Abstract Background: Renal impairment is a common feature of multiple myeloma (MM) seen in over a quarter of newly diagnosed patients (pts). Studies have confirmed the presence of renal impairment (RI) as a strong predictor of inferior survival in MM. Some studies have also indicated that reversibility of RI is associated with improved survival. However, it is not clear if normalization of renal function improves the outcome to that expected for MM pts without RI at diagnosis. Methods: We evaluated 1,135 consecutive pts with newly diagnosed MM seen at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester between December 2002 and January 2011. Renal function was assessed by the estimated creatinine clearance (CrCl) which was calculated by the modified MDRD formula. We examined these pts for improvement in renal function based on their CrCl at diagnosis and their highest CrCl during their disease course. RI was defined as having a CrCl of < 60. Pts were categorized based on their renal function at diagnosis and response to therapy: Group 1- CrCl >60 at diagnosis, Group 2- CrCl <60 at diagnosis but improved to >60 after therapy and Group 3- CrCl <60 at diagnosis and remained <60 after therapy. The degree of restoration of renal function was evaluated according to the IMWG criteria. Survival analysis was performed by the Kaplan-Meier method and differences assessed using the log rank test. Results: The median age at diagnosis was 65 years (range; 22 - 93) and 682 (60%) were male. The median follow up for the entire group from diagnosis was 73 mos (95% CI; 69 - 77). At diagnosis, 123 (11%) pts had a CrCl < 30, 322 (28%) had a CrCl of 30-59 and 690 (61%) had a CrCl >60. Most pts (N=754, 67%) received novel agent induction (NAI) therapy. The median PCLI was 0.7 (range: 0 – 22) and 91 (21%) pts had high-risk cytogenetics by FISH. The median OS for the pts with CrCl at diagnosis of < 30, 30-59 and >60 were 41 mos, 60 mos and not reached respectively (P < 0.001). Of the 445 patients with RI, the median absolute creatinine and CrCl at diagnosis were 1.6 mg/dL (range: 1 – 11) and 44 (range: 4 – 59) respectively. Among pts with RI, any improvement in CrCl was seen in 295 (66%) with median time to highest CrCl of 5 months and 228 (51%) had complete reversal of their RI. The median OS for pts with RI at diagnosis receiving and not receiving NAI therapy was not reached (NR) vs. 46 mos (P < 0.001). The median OS for Groups 1, 2 and 3 were NR, 60 and 49 mos respectively (Figure 1, P < 0.001). At a 6 month landmark analysis, the median OS for Groups 1, 2 and 3 were NR, 67 and 62 mos respectively (P < 0.001). The complete renal response and no renal response rates for pts with RI at diagnosis receiving and not receiving NAI induction therapy was (57% vs. 44%, P=0.004) and (29% vs. 39%, P=0.04) respectively. In a univariable analysis, presence of RI at diagnosis, no NAI therapy, older age, ISS stage 3, high-risk FISH, elevated PCLI, diagnosis prior to 2007 and increased LDH were found to predict for worse OS; however only older age (P<0.001), high-risk FISH (P=0.037) and lack of NAI therapy (P=0.023) retained their negative prognostic significance in a multivariable analysis. Conclusion: MM pts with RI treated with novel agent induction therapy demonstrate improved responses in their renal function and OS. The results also demonstrate improved outcome for pts with improvement in renal function, but it remains inferior to pts with normal renal function at diagnosis. These results have implications for early treatment strategies for pts at risk of developing renal insufficiency. Figure 1: OS based on improvement in CrCl upon receiving treatment Figure 1:. OS based on improvement in CrCl upon receiving treatment Figure 2 Figure 2. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Three Drug Combinations Based on Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (VD) Backbone Improve Renal Function More Efficiently Than VD in Myeloma Patients with Severe Renal Impairment

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.4769.4769 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 4769-4769 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽

Maria Roussou ◽

Evangelos Terpos ◽

Erasmia Psimenou ◽

Maria Gavriatopoulou ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Renal Function ◽

Renal Impairment ◽

Median Time ◽

Light Chain ◽

Early Death ◽

Drug Combinations ◽

Renal Recovery ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Renal Response ◽

Significant Difference

Abstract Renal impairment (RI) is a frequent complication of multiple myeloma (MM) and is associated with significant morbidity and risk of early death. Patients with severe RI (eGFR <30 ml/min/1.73 m2) have worse outcome and are frequently excluded from clinical trials. Two or three drug combinations based on the bortezomib and dexamethasone (VD) backbone have been proposed by the IWMG as the treatment of choice for patients who present with RI. In order to evaluate if two or three drug combinations were more efficient in patients who present with severe RI, we studied 56 (28M/28F) consecutive, unselected, newly diagnosed MM patients with severe RI who were treated in our center (University of Athens, Greece). Assessment of the degree of RI was made with the MDRD formula. Severe RI was defined as an eGFR of <30 ml/min/1.73 m2. Renal complete response (CRrenal) was defined as a sustained increase of baseline eGFR to >60 ml/min/1.73 m2, renal partial response (PRrenal) as an increase of eGFR from <15 to 30-50 ml/min/1.73 m2 and renal minor response (MRrenal) as a sustained improvement of baseline eGFR of <15 ml/min/1.73 m2 to 15-29 ml/min/1.73 m2 or if baseline eGFR was 15-29 ml/min/1.73 m2, improvement to 30-59 ml/min/1.73 m2. The median age of patients was 65 years (range: 37-88 years) and 21% of them were >75 years of age. The median eGFR was 11.2 ml/min/1.73 m2 (range: 3.4- 29.2 ml/min/1.73 m2); 64% had eGFR <15 ml/min/1.73 m2, including 16 (28.5%) patients who received dialysis with regular filters. Median level of proteinuria was 1.8 g/24h (range 0.2-12 g/24h) and involved free light chain (FLC) was 4250 mg/l (range 4.4-35,200 mg/l). All patients received VD-based regimens: 23 (41%) received VCD, 18 (32%) received VD, 8 (14%) received VTD, 5 (9%) received PAD, and 2 (4%) patients received VMP. An improvement of renal function (at least MRrenal) was recorded in 39 patients (70%) within a median time of 21 days (range 4-152 days). CRrenal was documented in 43% of patients and PRrenal in 9% (major renal response rate of 52%). Seven of 16 (44%) patients who required dialysis became dialysis independent. The median time to major renal response was 28 days (range 7-152 days). Patients with eGFR ≥15 ml/min/1.73 m2 (p=0.06) and age <65 years (p=0.036) had more rapid renal recovery (≥PRrenal). The type of light chain, presence of hypercalcemia (≥11 mg/dl) and elevated serum LDH (≥250 U/L) were not predictive of the probability of renal response. Using ROC analysis, we identified serum FLCs >12,500 mg/L as a cut-off associated with major renal response: only 16% of patients with FLCs >12,500 mg/L achieved a major renal response vs 59% of the others (p=0.053). Three-drug combinations (VTD, VCD, PAD, VMP) vs VD alone were associated with higher probability of major renal responses (65% vs 26%; p=0.006). Myeloma response to treatment by IMWG criteria was predictive of major renal response (p=0.05) in the univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, adjusted for age >65 years and need for dialysis, the use of three-drug combinations was independently associated with a higher probability of major renal response (OR: 3.91, 95% CI 1.014-15, p=0.048). There was also a trend towards a shorter time until a major renal response for patients treated with three vs two drugs (35 vs >90 days, p=0.14). There was no significant difference in the probability of major renal response or time to renal response for those who received VTD vs VCD, PAD or VMP, even after adjusting for need of dialysis and age. Among patients who required dialysis, 9 (56%) received a three drug combination (5 VTD, 3 VCD and one PAD); among patients who became independent of dialysis 3 received VTD, 1 PAD and 3 VD. An early death (within <2 months from treatment initiation) occurred in 6 (11%) patients (5 had received VD and only one VTD). The median survival for all patients was 53 months, similar for patients who achieved a major renal response vs those who did not (p=0.413). Toxicities were similar to those seen in myeloma patients without renal failure who were treated with bortezomib-based regimens. In conclusion, our data indicate that bortezomib–based regimens can improve renal function in the majority of patients with severe RI. Three drug combinations based on VD are associated with a higher probability of major renal response and with a shorter time to renal recovery and should be offered to all newly diagnosed patients with severe RI. The FLC level could be used as a predictive factor for renal response. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

The role of novel agents on the reversibility of renal impairment in newly diagnosed symptomatic patients with multiple myeloma

Leukemia ◽

10.1038/leu.2012.182 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 27 (2) ◽

pp. 423-429 ◽

Cited By ~ 87

Author(s):

M A Dimopoulos ◽

M Roussou ◽

M Gkotzamanidou ◽

N Nikitas ◽

E Psimenou ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Renal Impairment ◽

Novel Agents ◽

Newly Diagnosed

Download Full-text

Reversibility of Renal Impairment of Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated with Bortezomib-Based Regimens: Identification of Predictive Factors.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v112.11.1725.1725 ◽

2008 ◽

Vol 112 (11) ◽

pp. 1725-1725 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽

Maria Roussou ◽

Efstathios Kastritis ◽

Maria Gavriatopoulou ◽

Flora Zagouri ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Renal Failure ◽

Renal Function ◽

Partial Response ◽

Renal Impairment ◽

Creatinine Clearance ◽

Light Chain ◽

Management Problem ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Renal Response

Abstract Renal impairment (RI) is a frequent complication of multiple myeloma (MM) and a major management problem. Previous studies have shown that bortezomib is active and well tolerated in MM patients with RI and can be associated with improvement of renal function. The purpose of our analysis was to identify factors that may predict for renal impairment reversal in patients treated with bortezomib-based regimens. Over the last 5 years, 149 either newly diagnosed or relapsed/refractory MM patients received bortezomib-based regimens in our center. Our analysis is based on 46 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed (n=10) or relapsed/refractory (n=36) MM who presented with RI defined as creatinine clearance (CrCl) < 50 mL/min. Median CrCl was 23 mL/min (range 6 to 48), 34 (74%) had a CrCl<30 ml/min and 9 patients required renal dialysis. Sixteen patients (35%) had light chain only myeloma, elevated LDH>300 IU/L was found in 24%, more than 2 gr/day of Bence Jones protein in 20 (44%) and kappa to lambda free light chain ratio was ≥8 or ≤0.125 in 25%. Patients received bortezomib (B) at standard dose and schedule, plus dexamethasone (D) (16 patients, 35%), or BD in combination with other agents such as thalidomide, doxorubicin or melphalan (30 patients, 65%). Renal complete response (RCR) was defined as a sustained increase of CrCl to >60 mL/min after treatment. Renal partial response (RPR) was defined as an increase of CrCl by 50% and with improvement of renal function by at least one stage (stage IV: <30 mL/min, stage III 30–59 mL/min) but with a post treatment CrCl < 60 mL/min. RCR was documented in 22% of patients and RPR in 22% of patients. Thus, renal response (RCR + RPR) occurred in 20 patients (44%). The median time to renal response was 11 days (range 8 to 41). Among 9 patients who required dialysis 2 patients became independent of this procedure after the second cycle of treatment. The objective response rate (at least partial response) of the myeloma was 63%. Toxicities were similar to those seen in myeloma patients without renal failure who were treated with bortezomib-based regimens. Previously untreated patients (80% vs 33% for pretreated patients, p=0.012) and those with light chain only myeloma (69% vs 30%, p=0.012) had a higher probability to achieve renal response. Response of MM to treatment was also associated with higher rate of renal response (55% vs. 24% for non-responders, p=0.037). Creatinine clearance <30 ml/min (47% vs. 33% for ClCr 330 ml/min, p=0.410), age>75 years (p=0.309), corrected serum calcium ≥10,5 mg/dl (p=0.428), Bence Jones proteinuria ≥2g/day (p=0.167) or type of bortezomib regimen (BD or BD plus other agents, p=0.222) did not significantly affect the probability of renal response. Seventeen percent of patients presenting with RI died within the first 3 months after initiation of treatment. Patients with renal response had a trend for longer survival compared to those who did not achieve a renal response (79% vs 54% alive at 1 year, p=0.150). We conclude that when bortezomib-based regimens are administered to MM patients with RI, they are associated with a clinically meaningful renal response in 44% of them. Renal response is very rapid and occurred within 2 months in all patients. Previously untreated patients and those with light chain only myeloma may have a higher probability of renal response. Moreover, patients who achieved at least a partial response of their myeloma reversed RI more frequently than non-responders. Our data were derived from an unselected patient population with severe renal failure in more than two-thirds and with 20% of patients on dialysis. They provide further evidence that bortezomib-based regimens have a unique role in patients with RI.

Download Full-text

Treatment of Patients with Multiple Myeloma Complicated by Renal Failure with Bortezomib - Based Regimens.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v110.11.2739.2739 ◽

2007 ◽

Vol 110 (11) ◽

pp. 2739-2739 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Maria Roussou ◽

Efstathios Kastritis ◽

Athanasios Anagnostopoulos ◽

Erasmia Psimenou ◽

Irini Grapsa ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Renal Failure ◽

Renal Function ◽

Serum Creatinine ◽

Median Time ◽

Objective Response ◽

Elevated Serum ◽

Management Problem ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Kinetics Of

Abstract Introduction: Renal failure is a common feature of multiple myeloma and a major management problem. There is limited data regarding the reversibility of renal failure, the kinetics of serum creatinine and the safety of novel agents, such as bortezomib, when administered to newly diagnosed or relapsed/refractory patients with renal failure. The purpose of our analysis was to assess the frequency of renal failure improvement and kinetics of serum creatinine in patients who received bortezomib-based regimens. Patients and methods: We evaluated 20 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed (n=7) or relapsed/refractory (n=13) multiple myeloma and renal failure, defined as a serum creatinine ≥ 2mg/dl. Patients’ median age was 66 years (range 43–88 years). Median serum creatinine was 3.8 mg/dl (range 2–11.9 mg/dl) and median creatinine clearance was 15.3 ml/min (range 6.4–33.3). Other features included hemoglobin <10gr/dl in 12 patients, platelets <100 × 109/l in 3 patients and elevated serum LDH in 9 patients. All patients received bortezomib plus dexamethasone alone or in combination with other agents, such as thalidomide, doxorubicin or melphalan. Reversibility of renal failure was defined as a sustained decrease of serum creatinine to <1.5 mg/dl and renal response was defined as ≥50% decrease of serum creatinine from its peak value. Results: Reversal of renal failure was documented in 35% of all patients and the median time to reversal was 23 days. Moreover, 9 patients (45%) had 50% decrease in serum creatinine and the median time to decrease was 34 days. Some decrease of creatinine was documented in 88% of patients. Among four patients who were on renal dialysis, 2 became independent of this procedure after the second and the third cycle of treatment. The objective response rate was 61% and the median progression free survival for responders was 12 months. Toxicities were similar to those seen in myeloma patients without renal failure who were treated with bortezomib-based regimens. Grade 3–4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were seen in 28% and 22% of patients respectively. One patient died of infection and bortezomib had to be discontinued in 4 patients due to grade III neurotoxicity. Conclusions: When bortezomib-based regimens are administered to myeloma patients with renal impairment their toxicity and efficacy are similar to those observed in patients with normal renal function. Moreover, these regimens are associated with rapid improvement of renal function in most patients and with reversal of renal failure in one-third of them.

Download Full-text

Bortezomib-Thalidomide-Dexamethasone Compared with Thalidomide-Dexamethasone as Induction and Consolidation Therapy Before and After Double Autologous Transplantation In Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Results From a Randomized Phase 3 Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.42.42 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 42-42 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Michele Cavo ◽

Giulia Perrone ◽

Silvia Buttignol ◽

Elisabetta Calabrese ◽

Monica Galli ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Multivariate Analysis ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Induction Therapy ◽

Autologous Transplantation ◽

Consolidation Therapy ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Significant Difference

Abstract Abstract 42 We prospectively compared thalidomide-dexamethasone (TD) with bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone (VTD) as induction therapy before, and consolidation after, double autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). Three 21-d cycles of either VTD (V, 1.3 mg/m2 twice-weekly; T, 200 mg/d through d 1 to 63; D, 320 mg/cycle) or TD were given as induction therapy. Consolidation therapy comprised two 35-d cycles of VTD (V, 1.3 mg/m2 once-weekly; T, 100 mg/d through d 1 to 70; D, 320 mg/cycle) or TD. 474 patients randomized to the VTD (n=236) or TD (n=238) arm were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis for response rate, PFS and OS. Centrally reassessed CR/nCR rate was significantly higher in the VTD compared with the TD arm after all treatment phases, including induction therapy (30% vs 10%, p<0.0001), double autotransplantation (54% vs 42%, p=0.008) and consolidation therapy (60% vs 44%, p=0.001). Best confirmed overall CR/nCR rate was 71% in the VTD arm compared with 52% in the TD arm (p<0.0001); the corresponding values for VGPR or better were 89% vs 72%, respectively (p<0.0001). To evaluate the role of consolidation therapy we performed a per-protocol analysis of 323 patients, 161 treated with VTD and 162 with TD. Overall, upgraded responses with VTD and TD as consolidation therapy were observed in 55% vs 37% of patients, respectively (p=0.01; OR:1.15-3.77). Furthermore, the probability to improve responses from less than CR before consolidation to CR after consolidation was 28% with VTD vs 15% with TD (p=0.02; OR:1.07-4.57) (p=0.003 using the Mc Nemar's test). Post-consolidation molecular detection of minimal residual disease was the objective of a substudy; detailed results are reported in a separate abstract. Briefly, both qualitative and quantitative analyses confirmed the statistically significant superiority of VTD over TD in effecting higher rates of molecular remissions and reducing the burden of residual myeloma cells after ASCT. Any grade 3–4 non-hematologic adverse events were 10% with VTD (peripheral neuropathy: 1.3%, skin rash: 0.6%) vs 12% with TD. With a median follow-up of 31 months, median PFS was 42 months in the TD arm and was not yet reached in the VTD arm (44-month projected rate: 61%) (HR: 0.62 [CI: 0.45–0.87], p=0.006). Superior PFS in the VTD vs TD arm was retained across patient subgroups with poor prognosis, including those with t(4;14) and/or del(17p). Randomization to VTD overcome the adverse influence of t(4;14) on PFS (40-month projected rates: 69% vs 67% according to the presence or absence of this abnormality, respectively; p=0.6). By the opposite, in the TD arm corresponding median PFS values were 24.5 vs 41.5 months, respectively (p=0.01). The small numbers of patients with del(17p) in both arms of the study precluded a statistical comparison with del(17p)-negative group. In a multivariate analysis, variables favorably influencing PFS were beta2-m lower than 3.5 mg/L (HR:0.47; p=0.000), absence of t(4;14) and/or del(17p) (HR:0.52; p=0.000), randomization to VTD arm (HR:0.57; p=0.002), attainment of at least VGPR (HR:0.50; p=0.009) and CR (HR:0.8; p=0.01). No statistically significant difference between the overall treatment protocols was seen in terms of OS, although curves seemed to initially diverge after 40 months (44-month projected rates: 84% vs 74% for VTD and TD arms, respectively). A multivariate analysis showed the independent role of absence of t(4;14) and/or del(17p) (HR:0.42; p=0.003), ISS stage1-2 (HR:0.49; p=0.02) and randomization to VTD (HR:0.53; p=0.04) in prolonging OS. When time-dependent CR entered the model, absence of t(4;14) and/or del(17p) and less advanced ISS stage retained their positive prognostic value; attainment of CR (strictly related to VTD randomization) was an additional favorable variable. In conclusion, in comparison with the TD arm of the study, 1) VTD induction emerges as a new standard of care for maximizing the degree and speedy of tumor reduction in preparation for ASCT; 2) VTD consolidation effected significantly higher rates of upgraded responses, including CR, and of molecular remissions; 3) double ASCT incorporating VTD as induction and consolidation therapy resulted in significantly longer PFS, a benefit confirmed in a multivariate regression analysis and maintained in the subgroup of patients with adverse cytogenetic abnormalities. Disclosures: Cavo: Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Use of bortezomib and thalidomide as induction therapy before, and consolidation after, autologous transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Baccarani:NOVARTIS: Honoraria; BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Impact of lenalidomide-bortezomib-dexamethasone (RVd) induction on patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma and renal impairment: Results from the Connect MM Registry.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.8518 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 8518-8518

Author(s):

Sikander Ailawadhi ◽

Hans Chulhee Lee ◽

Jim Omel ◽

Kathleen Toomey ◽

James W. Hardin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Renal Function ◽

Renal Impairment ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Induction Treatment ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Front Line ◽

Real World Data ◽

The Impact

8518 Background: Patients (pts) with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) and renal impairment (RI) are often excluded from clinical trials. Data are limited on the effects of induction treatment in these pts, who may also be ineligible for autologous stem cell transplant (SCT) due to severity of RI. This analysis investigated the impact of RVd induction on renal function in transplant eligible (TE) and noneligible (TNE) pts from the Connect MM Registry, a US, multicenter, prospective, observational study. Methods: Eligible pts were ≥ 18 y and had symptomatic MM diagnosed ≤ 2 mos prior to enrollment, as defined by the International Myeloma Working Group criteria. For this analysis, pts that received front-line RVd for ≥ 3 cycles were grouped per transplant eligibility and renal function at baseline (BL; creatinine clearance [CrCl] < 30, 30-50, > 50-80, and > 80). Pts with progressive disease at BL were excluded. Renal function at 3 mos was measured. Median unadjusted progression-free survival (PFS) was calculated from start of regimen in TE and TNE populations, with pts grouped by CrCl (≤ 60 or > 60) at BL. Results: As of 7/23/19, 421 TE and 212 TNE pts received RVd for ≥ 3 cycles. TE and TNE pts were grouped by BL CrCl of < 30 (20 and 16 pts), 30-50 (36 and 50 pts), > 50-80 (117 and 63 pts), and > 80 (248 and 83 pts). Renal function improvement was observed in all pts receiving RVd, including those with moderate (30-50 CrCl) and severe (< 30 CrCl) RI at BL (Table). In pts with > 60 CrCl and ≤ 60 CrCl at BL, median PFS in TE pts was 48.6 mos and 43.2 mos, respectively. In TNE pts, median PFS was 36.4 mos and 30.6 mos, respectively. Conclusions: The results from the Connect MM Registry indicate that pts with NDMM and RI (including moderate and severe) who receive front-line RVd for ≥ 3 cycles may see improvement in renal function at 3 mos, regardless of transplant eligibility. RVd therefore can potentially be used in pts with RI. This analysis provides real-world data that support further investigation of RVd treatment in pts with moderate or severe RI. Clinical trial information: NCT01081028 . [Table: see text]

Download Full-text

Real-World Renal Function Among Patients with Multiple Myeloma in the United States

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-136630 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 29-30

Author(s):

Joseph Mikhael ◽

Erin Singh ◽

Megan Rice

Keyword(s):

United States ◽

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Renal Function ◽

Combination Therapy ◽

Renal Impairment ◽

Drug Class ◽

The United States ◽

Second Line ◽

Renal Response ◽

Treatment Line

Background Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most common hematologic malignancy and is associated with significant patient burden. Renal impairment has been shown to affect up to 50% of patients (pts) with MM. Renal impairment is an independent predictor of poor survival outcomes for pts with MM, with a median survival of approximately half that of pts without renal impairment. Aims To assess change in renal function by treatment line and drug class among pts with MM and renal impairment (defined as eGFR <50 mL/min/1.73 m2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation [eGFR-MDRD]), and to assess real-world outcomes by baseline renal status, renal response, and drug class. Methods Using the nationwide Flatiron Health EHR-derived de-identified database based in the United States, we identified MM pts diagnosed and treated between January 2011 and November 2019 who received ≥1 line of MM therapy and had information on race. We assessed the distribution of pts by eGFR-MDRD level at the start of the first and second line of therapy and the distribution of therapy use (ie, proteasome inhibitor [PI], immunomodulatory drug [IMiD], monoclonal antibody [mAb]). We also evaluated overall survival (OS) by treatment line, stratified by eGFR at the start of each treatment line. Complete renal response (CRR) was assessed in pts with eGFR-MDRD <50 mL/min/1.73 m2; using International Myeloma Working Group recommendations, responders were defined as pts with ≥1 eGFR measurement ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2 during the treatment line. Logistic regression models were used to examine the association between treatment class and complete renal responder status adjusted for other treatment classes received, age, sex, race, practice type, year of therapy line, and cytogenetic risk. Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine OS by treatment and renal response, adjusted for other treatment classes received, age, sex, race, practice type, year of therapy line, and cytogenetic risk. Flatiron Health, Inc., did not participate in the analysis of this data. Results For the 6990 pts included in the analysis, the mean age at start of initial therapy was 68 years, 46% were female, and 17% were Black. At start of treatment lines 1 and 2, approximately 25% had eGFR-MDRD <50 mL/min/1.73 m2. At treatment initiation, pts with renal impairment were older (71 vs 67 years) and were more likely to present with ISS stage III at diagnosis (38% vs 10%). Pts with renal impairment at the start of each treatment line exhibited decreased OS. Among pts with renal impairment, pts with PI use in first (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.36; 95% CI, 1.04-1.77) or second line (aOR 2.09; 95% CI, 1.38-3.16) were significantly more likely to have a CRR than those without PI use. Pts with IMiD use in first (aOR 2.14; 95% CI, 1.68-2.72) and second (aOR 1.61; 95% CI, 1.10-2.36) line were significantly more likely to have a CRR than those without IMiD use. When classified by both PI and IMiD use, pts with both PI and IMiD use were significantly more likely to have a CRR than those without use of either in the first (aOR 2.35; 95% CI, 1.54-3.60) and second line (aOR 3.89; 95% CI, 1.71-8.86). Pts with PI and IMiD use as well as a CRR also had greater OS in the first (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.52; 95% CI, 0.37-0.73) and second line (aHR 0.53; 95% CI, 0.32-0.88) vs pts without either PI or IMiD use and no CRR. The use of available mAbs in line 1 or line 2 was not significantly associated with renal response. Lower mAb use, especially in earlier treatment lines, prevented further analyses by mAb combination therapies. Conclusion In this study, MM pts with renal impairment were more likely to be older and to present with ISS stage III at diagnosis. Pts with decreased renal function exhibited decreased OS compared with non-renally impaired pts. Pts who were treated with combination therapy that included PIs and IMiDs together in early treatment lines were more likely to have a CRR and OS was prolonged among these pts, highlighting the benefits of combination therapy. These data suggest that treatment inducing a renal response may result in improved outcomes. Future investigations with larger datasets may improve the understanding of the prognostic value of renal impairment and optimal combination treatment regimens for these pts. Disclosures Mikhael: Amgen, Celgene, GSK, Janssen, Karyopharm, Sanofi, Takeda: Honoraria. Singh:Sanofi-Genzyme: Current Employment. Rice:Sanofi: Current Employment.

Download Full-text

Recovery of Renal Function and Independence from Dialysis in Newly Diagnosed and Relapsed Multiple Myeloma Patients - A Single Instituition Experience.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v110.11.4847.4847 ◽

2007 ◽

Vol 110 (11) ◽

pp. 4847-4847

Author(s):

Girish Ravindranathan ◽

Tanya Indrakumar ◽

Sohail Ahmad ◽

Moez Dungarwalla ◽

Pamela Kanagasabapathy ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Renal Failure ◽

Renal Function ◽

Renal Impairment ◽

Current Therapy ◽

High Dose ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Female Ratio ◽

Male To Female ◽

Relapsed Myeloma

Abstract Background: Renal impairment occurs in up to 30% of patients who present with multiple myeloma and in up tp 50% of patients at some stage of the illness. It is known that renal impairment can be reversed in a significant number of such patients by correction of precipitating factors and rehydration but that 3–12% patients will require dialysis or other major intervention. These patient have a worse prognosis largely due to an excess of early deaths, renal failure being the major cause of death in 14% of myeloma patients and contributing factor in a further 14%. (Drayson et al UK MRC MM trials 1980–2002) We have conducted a study to look into the clinical course and outcome of all patients with renal impairment sufficiently severe to be referred to the regional renal unit in South East England between 2000 and 2007 with either newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) or relapsed disease to try to identify features which predict for better outcomes. Methods: 62 patients with MM and renal failure received treatment in our hospital over the last 8 years. Patients have been assessed for recovery of renal function and dialysis independence in two groups - newly diagnosed (n=47) and relapsed patients (n=15). They were analysed separately as the disease tends to be biologically different at presentation and relapse, and therapeutic options may be different. In addition relatively little data on relapsed myeloma with renal failure is available. Results: 14 patients in the newly diagnosed group and 4 in the relapsed group were deemed unsuitable for an active treatment approach and have been excluded from statistical analysis in this paper but will be analysed separately to try to identify factors which could improve the outcome for this group. The patients with newly diagnosed MM and actively treated had a mean age of 65.3±1.7 years (range 41.9–83.3), male to female ratio of 1.7:1 and a mean peak creatinine at presentation of 684.5±60.9 mmol/l (range 107–1820). Light chain myeloma was overrepresented and was seen in 57.5% of patients (n=19). 12 (36.3%) of 33 the new patients avoided dialysis. 21 required dialysis, of whom 8 patients (38.1%) recovered function to dialysis independence at 6 months. There were only 3 deaths at 6 months follow-up. The mean age of the relapsed patients was 61.8±3.5 years (range 34.9–80.7), male to female ratio of 2.6:1 and a mean peak creatinine at presentation of 824±118.4 mmol/l (range 231–1591). Majority of myeloma was IgA in 36.3% (n = 4). Among the 11 relapsed, 82% (n=9) required dialysis but a significant proportion, 88% (n=8), were dialysis independent at 6 months There was only one death within 6 months of a relapse. Treatments in the 2 groups varied but involved the use of regimes containing high dose steroids in most patients. Conclusions: Our data suggest that renal failure and dialysis dependence can be avoided or is reversible in a large number of newly diagnosed and relapsed myeloma patients. This study of an unselected group of patients receiving current therapy provides an important baseline against which to compare the effect of approaches involving the newer biological agents.

Download Full-text