MEDI-551, a Humanized Monoclonal Anti-CD19, in Adults with Relapsed or Refractory Advanced B-Cell Malignancies: Results From a Phase 1/2 Study

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 3677-3677 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andres Forero ◽  
Mehdi Hamadani ◽  
Michelle A. Fanale ◽  
Celeste M. Bello ◽  
Thomas J Kipps ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Disease Assessment ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
B Cell Malignancies

Abstract Abstract 3677 Background: MEDI-551 is an affinity-optimized and afucosylated humanized IgG kappa monoclonal antibody directed against CD19 and induces malignant clone destruction by antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. This study evaluates the safety and preliminary efficacy profile of MEDI-551 in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies. These include chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL), and multiple myeloma (MM). Objectives: To determine the safety profile and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or optimal biological dose of MEDI-551 in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies. Secondary objectives include pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and clinical activity of MEDI-551. Methods: In this phase 1/2 open-label multicenter, global dose-escalation and expansion study, patients with relapsed or refractory CLL, DLBCL, FL, or MM received MEDI-551 (at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, or 12 mg/kg) by intravenous infusion administered over 28-day cycles using standard 3+3 dose escalation. Dose escalation continued until the MTD (≤12 mg/kg) was reached. Therapy continued for 2 cycles beyond complete response (CR), or until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. Dose-limiting toxicity was defined as a MEDI-551-related adverse event (AE) that prevented completion of a full first cycle of MEDI-551, or as a grade 3 or higher toxicity (excluding hematologic toxicity) that could not be ascribed to another cause, such as disease progression or accident. Results: Of the 63 patients (CLL [12], DLBCL [23], FL [23], MM [5]) who received ≥1 dose of MEDI-551, 25 patients (CLL [3], DLBCL [6], FL [12], MM [4]) were enrolled in the phase 1 escalation portion (Jun 2010–Aug 2011). No MTD was achieved. The phase 2 expansion phase is ongoing. Median age of patients treated was 62 years. The median of completed treatment cycles was 4.0 with a maximum of 15 cycles. Dose intensity was approximately 98%. There were 6 deaths due to AEs (none were drug-related) and 9 subjects discontinued treatment (2 [neutropenia and infusion site reaction] were nonserious drug-related AEs). Most AEs were grade 1/2 with dose-independent frequency and severity (Table). 13 patients had serious treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs); pneumonia, sepsis, and bacteremia in 1 patient were considered drug-related. 7 patients had grade 4 TEAEs (2 with neutropenia were drug-related) and 7 had grade 5 events, none related to drug. Of 43 patients in the evaluable for efficacy population (includes all patients who received any treatment of MEDI-551 and completed at least 1 post-baseline disease assessment), 5 had CR, 6 had partial responses (PR) and 21 had stable disease (SD; Figure 1). Median progression-free survival was ≈6 months (Figure 2). Conclusions: MEDI-551 demonstrated a safety profile warranting further study and no MTD was identified at the highest dose studied. The responses (CR: 11.6%; PR: 14.0%, objective response of 25.6% and SD of 48.8%) achieved in this single-agent study in heavily pretreated patients provide encouraging evidence of antitumor activity. Disclosures: Fanale: MedImmune: Research Funding. Kipps:MedImmune: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Gregory:MedImmune (ALLRESEARCH FINDING PROCEEDS GO TO RUSH UVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, NOT TOT ME PERSONALLY: Honoraria, Research Funding. Zhang:MedImmune: Employment. Goswami:MedImmune: Employment; AstraZeneca: Stocks, Stocks Other. Ibrahim:MedImmune: Employment; AstraZeneca: Stocks, Stocks Other. Yao:MedImmune: Employment. Herbst:MedImmune: Employment.

Safety Profile and Clinical Response To MEDI-551, a Humanized Monoclonal Anti-CD19, In a Phase 1/2 Study In Adults With Relapsed Or Refractory Advanced B-Cell Malignancies

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 1810-1810 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andres Forero-Torres ◽  
Mehdi Hamadani ◽  
Michelle A. Fanale ◽  
Celeste M. Bello ◽  
Thomas J. Kipps ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Stock Options ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
B Cell Malignancies

Abstract Background MEDI-551 is an affinity-optimized and afucosylated humanized IgG kappa monoclonal antibody directed against CD19 and induces malignant clone destruction by antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. This study evaluates the safety profile and clinical activity of MEDI-551 in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies. These include chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL), and multiple myeloma (MM). Objectives Determine the safety profile and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of MEDI-551 in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies. Secondary objectives include clinical activity of MEDI-551. Methods In this phase 1/2 open-label multicenter, global dose-escalation and expansion study, patients with relapsed or refractory CLL, DLBCL, FL, or MM received MEDI-551 (at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, or 12 mg/kg) by intravenous infusion administered over 28-day cycles using standard 3+3 dose escalation. Dose escalation continued to the maximum dose ≤12 mg/kg or until MTD was reached. Therapy continued for 2 cycles beyond complete response (CR), or until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. Dose-limiting toxicity was defined as a MEDI-551-related adverse event (AE) that prevented completion of a full first cycle of MEDI-551, or as a ≥grade 3 toxicity (excluding hematologic toxicity) that could not be ascribed to another cause. Results Of 91 patients who received ≥1 dose of MEDI-551, 25 patients (CLL [3], DLBCL [6], FL [12], MM [4]) were enrolled in the phase 1 escalation portion (Jun 2010–Aug 2011). No MTD was achieved. The phase 2 expansion phase included 66 patients (CLL [23], DLBCL [20], FL [22], MM [1]) as of 14Jul2013. Three patients were re-treated with MEDI-551 upon relapse. Median age of patients treated was 66 years; median lines of prior therapy was 6. The median number of treatment cycles was 5 with a maximum of 28 cycles. There were 14 deaths due to AEs (none were drug-related) and 15 subjects discontinued treatment. One subject each discontinued due to drug-related neutropenia and infusion reaction. Most AEs were grade 1/2 with dose-independent frequency and severity (Table). Of 91 patients, 5 (5.5%) patients had grade 4 TEAEs (2 with drug-related neutropenia) and 9 (9.9%) had grade 5 events, none were drug related. Of 19 patients with 38 serious AEs (SAE), 2 patients had 3 events that were considered drug-related; pneumonia and sepsis in 1 patient and infusion related reaction in the other. Of 83 patients in the efficacy evaluable population (includes all patients who received any treatment of MEDI-551 and completed at least 1 post-baseline disease assessment), 9 had CR, 12 had partial responses (PR) and 42 had stable disease (SD; Figure 1). ORR to single-agent MEDI-551 was 24%, 24%, or 31% respectively in heavily pre-treated patients with CLL, DLBCL, or FL. Median progression-free survival was ≈9 months (Figure 2). Conclusions MEDI-551 has an acceptable safety profile warranting further study. Anti-tumor activity was achieved in a heavily pre-treated population of DLBCL, CLL, and FL patients respectively in this single-agent study. Phase 2 studies of MEDI-551 in combination with chemotherapy in DLBCL and CLL are ongoing. Funding Source This study was sponsored by MedImmune. Disclosures: Forero-Torres: MedImmune: Research Funding. Hamadani:MedImmune: Research Funding. Fanale:MedImmune: Research Funding. Bello:MedImmune: Research Funding. Kipps:MedImmune: Research Funding. Offner:MedImmune: Research Funding. Verhoef:MedImmune: Research Funding. Federico:MedImmune: Research Funding. Gregory:MedImmune: Research Funding. Sonet:MedImmune: Research Funding. Assouline:MedImmune: Research Funding. Pérez de Oteyza:MedImmune: Research Funding. Tomas:MedImmune: Research Funding. Cuneo:MedImmune: Research Funding. Elgeioushi:MedImmune: Employment, Stock/stock options from AstraZeneca Other. Goswami:MedImmune: Employment, Stock/stock options from AstraZeneca Other. Ibrahim:MedImmune: Employment, Stock/stock options from AstraZeneca Other. Herbst:MedImmune: Employment, Stock/stock options from AstraZeneca Other. Cheson:MedImmune: Research Funding.

A Phase I Open-Label, Multi-Dose Escalation Study of the Dual Syk/Jak Inhibitor PRT062070 (Cerdulatinib) in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory B Cell Malignancies

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 3103-3103
Author(s):  
Manish Patel ◽  
Paul Hamlin ◽  
Donald K Strickland ◽  
Anjali Pandey ◽  
Greg Coffey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Markers Of Inflammation ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Introduction: Preclinical studies of the Syk-mediated B-cell receptor pathway and Jak-mediated cytokine pathways have demonstrated a potential therapeutic advantage for the dual inhibition of both Syk and Jak kinases in the treatment of B-cell malignancies. Cerdulatinib (PRT062070) was identified from a chemistry screen as a potent and selective inhibitor of Syk, Jak1, Jak3, and Tyk2, with minimal activity against Jak2. Cerdulatinib is efficacious in rodent models of B-cell lymphoma and autoimmune disease (Coffey et al., ASH 2012) and has demonstrated anti-tumor activity in genetically diverse B-cell lymphoma cell lines that is greater than that of Syk- or Jak- selective inhibitors alone (Ma et al., ASH 2013). Methods: This Phase 1 3+3 dose escalation study is evaluating cerdulatinib, given continuously on either a once daily (QD) or twice daily (BID) schedule, for relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). The primary objective is to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of cerdulatinib in patients with CLL or NHL. Secondary objectives are to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of cerdulatinib and to make a preliminary assessment of antitumor activity. Toxicity is graded according to the National Cancer Institute - Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) v4. Clinical response is evaluated according to published criteria (Hallek et al., Blood 2008:111:5446-5456; Cheson et al., J. Clin. Oncol. 2012: 25:579-586). The level of inhibition of Syk and Jak is determined using a variety of whole blood assays measuring signaling via receptors for the B-cell antigen, IL2, IL4, IL6, and GM-CSF. Serum markers of tumor burden, including CCL3, CCL4, and other markers of inflammation, are also being measured. Results: As of 4 August 2014, twelve patients have been enrolled in once daily dose cohorts of 15 mg QD, 30 mg QD, and 45 mg QD. No dose-limiting toxicities have been reported. Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs), regardless of causality, were: Grade 3 anemia (n=1), Grade 3 neutropenia (n=1), Grade 3 fatigue (n=1), Grade 3 hypotension (n=1), Grade 3 AST increased (n=1), Grade 3 hematochezia (n=1), and Grade 5 Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP; n=1). The patient who experienced PCP pneumonia was a 76 year old male with CLL who had received prior therapy with bendamustine and rituximab. Cerdulatinib is well-absorbed with an average terminal elimination half-life at steady state of 14 hours. Selective inhibition of Syk and Jak in whole blood assays was observed post-treatment, with IC25-IC50 (Cmin to Cmax at steady-state) against these targets achieved at the 15 mg dose level, and IC50-IC80 (Cmin to Cmax at steady-state) achieved at the 30 mg and 45 mg doses. Reductions of >50% in serum markers of inflammation, as well as in CCL3 and CCL4, were noted at all dose levels post-treatment. Two patients treated at the 15 mg dose (1 CLL, 1 follicular lymphoma [FL]) remained on study for >230 and >200 days, respectively, with stable disease (SD) prior to disease progression. One patient treated at the 30 mg dose (diffuse large B-cell lymphoma [DLBCL], who did not respond to prior R-CHOP therapy), remained on study with SD for 140 days. One patient treated at the 30 mg dose (CLL) experienced a >60% decrease in peripheral lymphocyte count prior to coming off study for PCP pneumonia. Another patient treated at the 30 mg dose (CLL) experienced early lymphocytosis and a 33% reduction in lymph node size at the end of Cycle 2 and remains on study in Cycle 3. One patient treated at the 45 mg dose (FL) experienced a 40% decrease in lymph node size at the end of Cycle 4 and remains on study in Cycle 5. Conclusions: Cerdulatinib has been well tolerated in the initial cohorts of this Phase 1 study, with no dose-limiting toxicities and preliminary evidence of anti-tumor activity. Dose escalation continues and Phase 2 expansion cohorts are planned in CLL, DLBCL and FL. Disclosures Hamlin: Gilead, Spectrum, Seattle Genetics, Genentech: Consultancy; Spectrum, GSK, Jansen and Jansen/Pharmacyclics, Portola, Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Strickland:SCRI Development Innovations: Employment. Pandey:Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment; Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Equity Ownership. Coffey:Portola Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Leeds:Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Levy:Portola Pharmaceuticals: Employment; University of Michigan: Patents & Royalties. Curnutte:Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership; Sea Lane Biotechnologies: Consultancy; 3-V Biosciences: Equity Ownership. Wagner-Johnston:Gilead: Consultancy; Gilead: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Research Funding. Flinn:Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Safety and Efficacy of Venetoclax Combined with Rituximab, Ifosfamide, Carboplatin and Etoposide Chemoimmunotherapy (VICER) for Treatment of Relapsed Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma: Results from the Phase 1 Study

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 397-397 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Caimi ◽  
Deepa Jagadeesh ◽  
Kirsten Marie Boughan ◽  
Robert M. Dean ◽  
Brenda Cooper ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Introduction: Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory (r/r) disease after front line chemoimmunotherapy have poor survival. Standard second line therapy for r/r DLBCL consists of platinum-based chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Approximately 50% of pts do not respond to second line therapy, highlighting the need for increased efficacy of these regimens. The antiapoptotic protein Bcl-2 is overexpressed in approximately 30% of DLBCL cases. Preclinical and early clinical data suggest that addition of venetoclax (VEN), a potent selective Bcl-2 inhibitor, to chemoimmunotherapy augments response rates and durability in lymphoma. We conducted a phase 1 dose escalation and dose expansion study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of VEN in combination with R-ICE (rituximab, ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide) (VICER) r/r DLBCL pts. Here we present the results after completion of VEN dose escalation. Methods: Patients (≥18 years of age) with r/r DLBCL who failed one or two lines of therapy were enrolled. The primary objective was to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of VEN when combined with R-ICE. VEN was given orally on days 1 - 10 of each 21 - day cycle x 3 cycles. Dose escalation was conducted according to a 3+3 design, with 3 dose levels (400, 600 and 800mg). R-ICE was given at standard dose and schedule on days 1 - 3 of each cycle for 3 cycles. No intra-patient dose escalation was allowed. Tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) mitigation included inpatient administration, hydration, allopurinol and frequent laboratory evaluation during cycle 1. All patients received pegfilgrastim; use of prophylactic antibiotics during neutropenia was left at the discretion of the treating physician. Results: As of July 20, 2018, 18 pts with DLBCL (14 male, 4 female) were enrolled (VEN 400mg, n = 3; 600 mg, n = 3; 800 mg, n = 12). Median age of pts was 55.5 years [range 27-78]. All pts received rituximab and anthracycline containing first - line therapy, 4 patients had failed a second line of therapy. One patient experienced dose limiting toxicity (DLT) at 800 mg VEN, with acute renal failure, febrile neutropenia, sepsis and rapid tumor progression and died after cycle 1. No other DLTs were observed. Hematologic toxicity was common, with grade ≥3 anemia in 6 (33%) pts; grade ≥3 neutropenia in 14 (78%) pts and grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia in 10 (55%) pts. Five (28%) pts experienced febrile neutropenia. The most common non-hematologic all-grade treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were fatigue (7 [38%] pts), nausea (6 [33%] pts); diarrhea (6 [33%] pts), anorexia (5 [27%] pts], infection (5 [27%] pts) and sensory neuropathy (5 [27%] pts). Grade ≥3 TEAEs included infection (4 [22%] pts), cholecystitis (2 [11%]) and one case each (5.5%) of peripheral edema, acute renal failure, acute coronary syndrome, atrial fibrillation, hyponatremia and hypokalemia. One case of laboratory TLS occurred, but no clinical TLS was observed. At data cutoff, the intent-to-treat (ITT) population included 13 patients that had at least one cycle of therapy and end of treatment response or had discontinued prior to response assessment; 3 pts did not complete all planned cycles of VICER: one patient died after DLT, one patient proceeded to ASCT in complete remission (CR) after 2 cycles and another withdrew after cycle 1, achieving partial remission (PR) with additional 2 cycles of R-ICE. Nine pts (69%) achieved CR and 2 (15%) achieved PR (overall response rate (ORR): 11/13 [84.6%]) (Tables 2 and 3). Figure 1 depicts tumor response data. Among 11 responding pts, 7 have undergone stem cell collection, with a median CD34 cell count of 3.73x106 cells/kg. Seven pts have completed their ASCT, with hematopoietic engraftment in all cases. Median follow up of patients in CR/PR is 6 months (range 1 - 12), none has experienced progression. Conclusions: In this Phase 1 study, VICER shows encouraging antilymphoma activity in r/r DLBCL, including double hit/double expressor lymphomas, with high rates of complete metabolic response (69% CR by PET), which is higher than historical levels reported with R-ICE alone (CR typically <45%). The RP2D of VEN is 800 mg. Hematologic toxicity - particularly neutropenia - is common, and G-CSF support as well as antibiotic prophylaxis are necessary to prevent infectious complications. Updated safety, progression-free survival and response data will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures Caimi: Kite Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Hill:Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Subcutaneous Epcoritamab in Combination with R-CHOP in Patients with Previously Untreated High-Risk Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Preliminary Results from a Phase 1/2 Trial

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1413-1413
Author(s):  
David Belada ◽  
Jacob Haaber Christensen ◽  
Kristina Drott ◽  
Sylvia Snauwaert ◽  
Joshua Brody ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Metabolic Response ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: In patients (pts) with newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) that is considered high risk (revised International Prognostic Index [R-IPI]: 3-5), standard treatment with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) is associated with a 4-year overall survival rate of 55% (Sehn et al, Blood 2007). Epcoritamab (DuoBody ®-CD3×CD20) is a subcutaneously administered bispecific antibody that simultaneously binds to CD3 on T cells and CD20 on malignant B cells to induce T-cell-mediated killing. Single-agent epcoritamab demonstrated a manageable safety profile and substantial antitumor activity in pts with heavily pretreated B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in the first-in-human phase 1/2 trial (EPCORE NHL-1; NCT03625037). Among pts with relapsed/refractory DLBCL treated at the identified recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of 48 mg (n=8), the overall response rate was 88% and the complete response rate was 38% (Hutchings, Lancet, in press). These encouraging data supported initiation of the EPCORE NHL-2 phase 1/2 trial (NCT04663347), which is evaluating epcoritamab in combination with various standard of care therapies in pts with B-cell NHL. We present data from arm 1 of this trial, in which epcoritamab in combination with R-CHOP is evaluated in pts with previously untreated high-risk DLBCL. Methods: Adults with previously untreated DLBCL and an R-IPI score ≥3 received flat-dose epcoritamab in combination with standard R-CHOP for 6 cycles followed by epcoritamab monotherapy. The study includes a dose-escalation cohort (epcoritamab doses: dose level 1 = 24 mg; dose level 2 = 48 mg). Step-up dosing of epcoritamab (ie, priming and intermediate doses before first full dose) and corticosteroid prophylaxis were used as previously described (Hutchings, Lancet, in press) to mitigate cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Tumor response was evaluated by positron emission tomography-computed tomography obtained once every 6 weeks for the first 24 weeks. Results: As of July 15, 2021, 9 pts have been treated with the combination of epcoritamab + R-CHOP (4 with epcoritamab 24 mg; 5 with 48 mg). Median age was 66 years (range, 56-78). All pts had stage III-IV disease. At data cutoff, all pts remained on treatment with a median follow-up of 12.2 weeks (range, 2.2-28.2). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were CRS (56%; all grade 1/2), anemia (56%; grade 1-3), neutropenia (44%; all grade 3/4), fatigue (33%; all grade 1/2), and peripheral neuropathy (33%; all grade 1/2). Notably, no grade ≥3 CRS events or cases of febrile neutropenia were reported. No dose-limiting toxicities have been observed. Four pts have had ≥1 response assessment, with 3 achieving complete metabolic response (CMR; all in the epcoritamab 24 mg dose-escalation cohort) and 1 pt achieving partial metabolic response (epcoritamab 48 mg cohort) by week 6; 2 of the 3 pts with CMR had response assessments at 6 months, and both remained in CMR at that time. Both dose cohorts have been cleared by the Dose Escalation Committee and Safety Committee, and the expansion part has been opened to enroll additional pts. Conclusions: These preliminary data from a small number of pts suggest that epcoritamab in combination with R-CHOP has a manageable safety profile with no new safety signals. Adverse events were similar to those previously reported for epcoritamab and R-CHOP individually. All evaluable pts achieved early responses, and all pts remain on treatment. Updated and additional data from pts treated in the expansion phase will be presented. These findings warrant further evaluation of epcoritamab for the treatment of high-risk, newly diagnosed DLBCL. Disclosures Belada: Genmab: Research Funding. Drott: Roche: Honoraria; Kyowa Kirin: Honoraria; Respiratorius AB: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Narkhede: TG Therapeautics: Research Funding; Genmab: Other: Medical writing support, Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding. Elliot: Genmab: Current Employment, Patents & Royalties: P158-US-PSP3 . Liu: Genmab: Current Employment. Cota Stirner: AbbVie: Current Employment. Abbas: Genmab: Current Employment. Falchi: Abbvie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genmab: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Genetech: Research Funding. Clausen: Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel expences ASH 2019; Gilead: Consultancy, Other: Travel expences 15th ICML ; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Phase 1 Clinical Study of Atacicept in Patients with Relapsed and Refractory B-Cell Lymphoma.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 2722-2722 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Ansell ◽  
Thomas E. Witzig ◽  
Anne Novak ◽  
David James ◽  
Luis Porrata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Malignancies ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Heavily Pretreated

Abstract Background: Atacicept (TACI-Ig) is a recombinant fusion protein that inhibits BLyS (B lymphocyte stimulator) and APRIL (a proliferation-inducing ligand), cytokines that are involved in B-cell homeostasis and immunoglobulin (Ig) expression and are overexpressed in B-cell malignancies. In vitro, atacicept decreases the survival of lymphoma cells and in vivo, atacicept decreases serum immunoglobulin levels. Based on its effects on B cells, atacicept may offer a novel treatment for B-cell malignancies. Methods: A Phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation study of atacicept in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell lymphoma was performed. Atacicept was administered subcutaneously for 5 weeks in single weekly doses of 2, 4, 7, or 10 mg/kg to sequential patient cohorts. After 8 weeks, patients with responding or stable disease were eligible for treatment on an extension study at the dose previously received for up to 24 weeks or until disease progression. The primary study objective was evaluation of overall safety and the maximum tolerated dose. Pharmacokinetics and biomarkers were also investigated. Results: As of July 2006, 15 patients with relapsed and refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (7), follicular lymphoma (4), small lymphocytic lymphoma/chronic lymphocytic leukemia (2), and mantle-cell lymphoma (2) received 2, 4, or 7 mg/kg atacicept (4 patients per dose cohort) or 10 mg/kg atacicept (3 patients). All patients were heavily pretreated (median number of previous treatments was 5, range 1–10) and 4 patients had previously received a stem cell transplant. All patients completed study treatment (5 doses), except 2 who withdrew due to disease progression after receiving 2 and 4 doses. Atacicept was well tolerated at all doses. The most common adverse events (AEs) that occurred in ≥20% of patients were fatigue (47%) and injection site bruising (20%). Three AEs with ≥ grade 3 severity were reported for 1 patient including pain in jaw, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, and sepsis; all were considered unrelated to atacicept. Four SAEs considered unrelated to atacicept were reported for 2 patients who withdrew due to disease progression. Pharmacokinetic results were nonlinear and consistent with observations in other indications. Five weekly doses produced low to moderate accumulation of free total atacicept and atacicept/BLyS complex in serum. IgA, IgG, and IgM concentrations decreased in a dose-related pattern with a mean decrease of 15–40% from baseline after 4 weeks of atacicept. Peripheral B-cell numbers were variable and were difficult to evaluate due to low B-cell values at baseline in the majority of patients. At the 8-week evaluation, no objective responses were observed. Two patients had stable disease (1 with mantle cell lymphoma and 1 with follicular lymphoma) at 8 weeks, entered the extension study, and received additional doses of atacicept with no safety or tolerability concerns. Both patients however later discontinued treatment due to disease progression. Conclusion: Atacicept at doses of up to 10 mg/kg was well tolerated and demonstrated biological activity by decreasing Ig concentrations in this heavily pretreated cohort of patients with refractory B-cell lymphoma, although tumor responses were not observed.

Safety and Clinical Activity of the Anti-CD22 Immunoconjugate Inotuzumab Ozogamicin (CMC-544) in Combination with Rituximab in Follicular Lymphoma or Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Preliminary Report of a Phase 1/2 Study

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 266-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis Fayad ◽  
Hemant Patel ◽  
Gregor Verhoef ◽  
Mitchell R. Smith ◽  
Peter W.M. Johnson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin ◽  
Total N ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Large B Cell

Abstract Inotuzumab ozogamicin (CMC-544) is an antibody-targeted chemotherapy agent composed of a humanized CD22 antibody, conjugated to calicheamicin, a potent cytotoxic antitumor agent. Inotuzumab ozogamicin targets B-cell malignancies since they often express CD22. In a previously reported phase 1 dose-escalation trial in patients with CD22-positive B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL), the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was determined to be 1.8 mg/m2 every 4 weeks. Responses were seen in patients with both follicular lymphoma (FL) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). This ongoing study consisted of a limited dose escalation (DE) portion to confirm the MTD of inotuzumab ozogamicin when combined with rituximab, followed by an expanded MTD cohort to further define safety and efficacy. Patients with FL and DLBCL who relapsed or progressed after 1 or 2 prior therapies were eligible. Prior rituximab treatment was required and prior autologous transplant allowed if &gt;6 months from enrollment. Rituximab refractory patients, as defined by progression within 6 months of the first dose of rituximab, were excluded. Patients received rituximab 375 mg/m2 on day 1 of each 28-day cycle and inotuzumab ozogamicin on day 2 at doses of 0.8 mg/m2 (n=5), 1.3 mg/m2 (n=3), and 1.8 mg/m2 (n=7) for a maximum of 8 cycles. After confirmation of the MTD dose at 1.8 mg/m2 ditional patients were enrolled in an expanded MTD cohort. Safety data and preliminary efficacy data were collected. As of June 2008, the DE portion was completed and the study is enrolling in the MTD portion. To date, 61 patients have been treated: median age 63 yr (range 33–85 yr), 62% men. All 61 patients were evaluable for safety and currently 30 patients (16 FL, 14 DLBCL) in the expanded MTD cohort were evaluable for tumor response based on available data. 20% of patients discontinued treatment due to an adverse event (AE), which included hematologic AEs (8 patients) or elevation of ³1 liver function test (5 patients). The overall safety profile was characterized by AEs that were manageable; the most common drug-related AEs (all grades) were thrombocytopenia (41%), nausea (38%), fatigue (36%), AST increased (26%), and neutropenia (25%). Grade 3/4 AEs that occurred in 5% of patients included thrombocytopenia (21%), neutropenia (15%), and lymphopenia (7%). Tumor responses were seen in all DE cohorts and the MTD cohort, and the response rates in evaluable patients are shown in the Table. The 6-month progressionfree survival rate was 100% for FL and 66% DLBCL for all patients in the MTD cohort. The safety profile of inotuzumab ozogamicin plus rituximab exhibits a similar profile seen in the previous inotuzumab ozogamicin monotherapy study. The main toxicity was clinically manageable, self-limited thrombocytopenia. The preliminary efficacy in recurrent/refractory FL and DLBCL is promising and may indicate a durable response. These data support the continuing development of inotuzumab ozogamicin in combination with rituximab in the management of NHL. Table: Best Overall Response, Evaluable* Patients in the Dose Escalation (DE) and MTD Cohorts FL, n (%) DLBCL, n (%) DE MTD DE MTD Response 0.8 (n=1) 1.3 (n=2) 1.8 (n=3) Total (n=6) 1.8 (n=16) 0.8 (n=3) 1.3 (n=1) 1.8 (n=2) Total (n=6) 1.8 (n=14) CR=complete response; CRu=CR unconfirmed; ORR=objective response rate (CR/CRu+partial response) *Best response during treatment and follow up. Evaluable patients had 32 doses inotuzumab ozogamicin and a response assessment CR/CRu 1 (100) 1 (50) 1 (33) 3 (50) 7 (44) 1 (33) 0 1 (50) 2 (33) 6 (43) ORR 1 (100) 2 (100) 2 (67) 5 (83) 14 (88) 1 (33) 1 (100) 2 (100) 4 (67) 10 (71)

scholarly journals Updated Results of a Phase I Study of Ibrutinib and Lenalidomide in Patients with Relapsed and Refractory B-Cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 3983-3983 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beth A Christian ◽  
John G. Kuruvilla ◽  
Sonali M. Smith ◽  
Pierluigi Porcu ◽  
Kami J. Maddocks ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Off Label ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Introduction: Lenalidomide, an immunomodulatory agent, and ibrutinib, a selective and covalent inhibitor of Bruton's tyrosine kinase, are orally bioavailable agents with single-agent activity in several histologic subtypes of relapsed/refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). We are conducting a phase I study of the combination of ibrutinib and lenalidomide to determine the maximum tolerated dose, dose limiting toxicities (DLT), and preliminary efficacy in pts with relapsed/refractory NHL and updated results are presented. Methods: Patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory B-cell NHL including diffuse large B-cell (DLBCL), transformed, mantle cell (MCL), marginal zone (MZL), lymphoplasmacytic (LPL), and follicular (FL) lymphoma who have received at least one prior therapy were eligible. Prior autologous but not allogeneic stem cell transplant and prior lenalidomide were permitted. Prior ibrutinib, CNS involvement, and pts requiring anticoagulation were not permitted. ANC > 1000/mm3, platelets > 50,000/mm3, and creatinine < 2.0 mg/dL, ALT/AST ≤ 2.5 x ULN, bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x ULN, and ECOG PS 0-2 were required at study entry. Treatment consisted of escalating doses of lenalidomide days 1-21 and ibrutinib days 1-28 of a 28 day cycle. A standard 3+3 dose escalation schema was followed. DLTs included: treatment delays > 14 days for toxicity; grade 5 toxicity; tumor lysis syndrome requiring dialysis; tumor flare reaction nonresponsive to corticosteroids; ANC < 500/mm3 or platelets <25, 000/mm3 persisting > 7 days; grade 3 or 4 febrile neutropenia or infection; and any grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity with the following exceptions: DVT, diarrhea, nausea or vomiting amenable to medical therapy, correctable electrolyte abnormalities; grade 3 fatigue, or grade 3 maculopapular rash that resolved within 7 days. Pts without significant toxicity could continue treatment until disease progression. Response was assessed every 3 months for 12 months and then every 6 months until disease progression. Results: Twenty-five pts have been treated. Median age is 67 years (range 45-85) with 16 males. Histologies include DLBCL/transformed lymphoma (n=9), MCL (n=7), FL (n=4), MZL (n=2), and LPL (n=3). Four pts were treated at dose level (DL) 1 (lenalidomide 15 mg/ibrutinib 420 mg). One pt was replaced for rapid disease progression and 1 pt experienced DLT consisting of a grade 2 ischemic stroke. As a result of this DLT, DL 1 was expanded to 6 evaluable pts. A second DLT was observed, a grade 3 rash that resolved within 7 days but recurred on day 22. A total of 6 pts were then treated at DL-1 (lenalidomide 10 mg/ibrutinib 280 mg), and no DLTs were encountered. The protocol was amended to include additional dose levels. Pts enrolled on dose level -1A with lenalidomide 10 mg and ibrutinib 420 mg. One DLT occurred at this dose level, a grade 3 rash that failed to resolve within 7 days. The dose level was expanded to 6 pts without further DLT. DL-1B includes an intra-pt dose escalation of the lenalidomide from 10 mg in cycle 1 to 15 mg in cycle 2 with ibrutinib 420 mg. Six pts have been enrolled on this dose level. Three pts have been replaced including 2 with cytopenias not meeting DLT criteria but precluding dose escalation and one with progressive disease. Three pts at DL-1B remain on treatment. Related grade 3-4 toxicities occurred in 16/24 currently evaluated pts (67%), including primarily hematologic toxicity, rash, increased LFTs, pneumonia, hypokalemia, and syncope. Pts have received a median of 3 cycles of therapy to date (range 1-19) and 9 remain on therapy. At DL 1, a pt with DLBCL achieved a complete response (CR) and a pt with transformed follicular achieved a partial response (PR). At DL-1, a pt with DLBCL achieved a CR and 1 pt each with MCL and FL achieved PR. At DL -1A, 1 pt each with MCL and MZL achieved a PR. Overall response rate for 18 assessable pts is 39%. Five pts had best response of stable disease. Sixteen pts have discontinued the study including 3 pts with DLTs, 2 for alternative treatment, 2 for toxicity, and 9 pts with progression. Conclusions: Combined therapy with lenalidomide and ibrutinib in pts with relapsed NHL is well-tolerated, although DLTs of recurrent rash and stroke were encountered. Lenalidomide 10 mg and ibrutinib 420 mg was tolerated and pts are currently enrolling in an intra-pt dose escalation cohort. Preliminary efficacy has been observed in pts with relapsed/refractory DLBCL, MCL, FL, MZL, and transformed NHL. Disclosures Christian: Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Immunomedics: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Other: IDSM; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Off Label Use: The use of ibrutnib and lenalidomide in combination in relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma is off-label. Kuruvilla:Karyopharm: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche Canada: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Research Funding. Smith:Celgene: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy. Porcu:Cell Medica: Research Funding; Infinity: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Shape: Research Funding. Maddocks:Acerta: Research Funding; Pharamcyclics: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Byrd:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Blum:Celgene: Research Funding; cephalon: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Safety and pharmacokinetics of polatuzumab vedotin in Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a phase 1 dose-escalation study

2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 70-77
Author(s):  
Tomohiro Kinoshita ◽  
Kiyohiko Hatake ◽  
Kazuhito Yamamoto ◽  
Yusuke Higuchi ◽  
Satsuki Murakami ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Japanese Patients ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma

Abstract Objective A phase 1 dose-escalation study of polatuzumab vedotin (pola) was conducted to assess safety, pharmacokinetics and preliminary antitumor activity of pola in Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Methods Patients received pola (1.0 or 1.8 mg/kg) intravenously every 21 days until disease progression or intolerance. Intra-patient dose escalation was prohibited. Tolerability was determined by the standard 3 + 3 rule. Blood sampling was performed to characterize pharmacokinetics. Antitumor activity was evaluated through computed tomography and bone marrow sampling. Results Four patients received pola 1.0 mg/kg; three received 1.8 mg/kg. Patients had follicular lymphoma (n = 4) or diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n = 3), median age of 62 years, received a median of 3 prior therapies; six were female. Pola was well tolerated in both cohorts, with no dose-limiting toxicities observed. The most common adverse event was peripheral sensory neuropathy (n = 4). Grade 3 adverse events were cholecystitis and neutrophil count decreased (one each; both 1.0 mg/kg), and syncope and cataract (one each; both 1.8 mg/kg). The plasma half-life of antibody-conjugate monomethyl auristatin E was 4.43–7.98 days, and systemic exposure of unconjugated monomethyl auristatin E was limited in both cohorts. Four patients achieved objective responses (three complete, one partial) without disease progression during the study. Conclusions This phase 1 dose-escalation study demonstrated that pola has an acceptable safety profile and offers encouraging antitumor activity to Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Pola 1.8 mg/kg, the recommended phase 2 dose, was tolerable in Japanese patients.

scholarly journals Mature Results of a Phase 1-2 Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Study of Intravenous SNS01-T in Patients (pts) with Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Malignancies

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 4464-4464 ◽  
Author(s):  
David S. Siegel ◽  
Andrew McDonald ◽  
Nicolas Novitzky ◽  
William Bensinger ◽  
Michael Craig ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Death ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Infusion Reaction ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A (eIF5A) has been implicated in the regulation of cell proliferation, apoptosis, and inflammation. SNS01-T is a novel therapeutic with a dual mechanism of eIF5A modulation: inducing cell death via siRNA-mediated inhibition of hypusinated eIF5A while simultaneously causing over-expression of pro-apoptotic eIF5AK50R via a DNA plasmid with a B-cell promoter to induce tumor cell death, using a PEI vector. SNS01-T significantly inhibits tumor growth and increases survival in mouse models of myeloma (MM), mantle cell and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Methods This is an open label, phase 1-2 dose escalation study in pts with refractory B-cell cancers, comprising 4 SNS01-T dose cohorts: 0.0125, 0.05, 0.2 and 0.375 mg/kg twice weekly IV for 6 weeks. Key inclusion criteria are: MM per IMWG criteria or lymphomas or plasma cell leukemia with histologic confirmation; measurable disease, relapsed or refractory after ≥2 prior regimens; not eligible for standard therapy known to extend life expectancy. Primary endpoints are safety and tolerability of SNS01-T. Secondary endpoints include pharmacokinetics, tumor response (M protein, % plasma cells, radiologic response) and time to relapse or progression. Efficacy assessments were performed at baseline and after 12 infusions in all pts (week 6); myeloma pts were also assessed at week 3. Results All cohorts will have completed enrollment in August 2014 and dosing in cohort 4 will be complete by September. A total of 21 pts have been treated, of whom 18 currently have data available. Demographics are provided in Table 1. Abstract 4464. Table 1:DemographicsSNS01-T DoseOverall(n=18)0.0125 mg/kg(n=6)0.05 mg/kg(n=4)0.2 mg/kg(n=4)0.375 mg/kg(n=4)Median age (range)63 (55-77)61.5 (57-66)63 (60-77)68 (66-74)58 (55-71)Male, n (%)12 (67)5 (83)03 (75)4 (100)Caucasian, n (%)17 (94)6 (100)3 (75)4 (100)4 (100)Median weight in kg (range)84 (53-117)81 (69-103)58 (53-87)86 (77-92)97 (81-117)Median performance status (range)1 (0-2)1 (0-1)1 (0-2)0 (0-2)1 (0-1)Cancer type, n (%) Multiple myeloma DLBCL15 (83) 3 (17)6 (100) 03 (75) 1 (25)2 (50) 2 (50)4 (100) 0Median prior therapies (range)5 (2-17)4.5 (3-12)6.5 (2-13)7.5 (2-17)7 (5-14) Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) were reported for all pts. The most frequently reported System Organ Classes were General Disorders and Administration Site Conditions (72%) and Gastrointestinal Disorders (56%), with somewhat higher reporting frequency in dose cohorts 3 and 4. The most commonly reported AEs were fatigue (50%), nausea (33%), infusion-related reaction (33%), chills (28%), thrombocytopenia (22%) and pyrexia (17%). Thrombocytopenia, nausea, fatigue, infusion reaction appeared to show some degree of dose relationship. Grade ≥3 TEAEs occurred in 50% of pts with no obvious dose relationship. The only grade ≥3 TEAE reported in >1 pt was thrombocytopenia (17%). There have been no treatment-related deaths. There was 1 DLT at dose level 4 (0.375 mg/kg). Pt 51-001 did not receive premedication prior to the third infusion of SNS01-T and consequently experienced a grade 4 infusion reaction, from which all symptoms resolved within 24 hours. Study treatment was discontinued and the protocol was amended to require the following premedication at each SNS01-T infusion: a corticosteroid, antihistamine and acetaminophen are obligatory, plus an opioid as clinically indicated. Preliminary efficacy was explored. To date, 2 pts have shown stable disease of myeloma at week 3 with some decrease in serum and urine disease markers and one pt with DLBCL had a 15% decrease in small lymph node disease with approximately a 5 month duration. These patients were in cohorts 3 and 4. Conclusions SNS01-T administration was feasible in all 4 dose cohorts with prophylaxis for infusion reactions. Early signs of potential efficacy are encouraging. Expansion of efficacy testing to more patients and combination studies are planned. Disclosures Siegel: Senesco: PI Other. McDonald:Senesco: PI Other. Novitzky:Senesco: PI Other. Bensinger:Senesco: PI Other. Craig:Senesco: PI Other. van Rhee:Senesco: PI Other. Gutierrez:Senesco: PI Other. Libby:Senesco: PI Other. Thompson:Senesco: Consultancy, Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Bexon:Senesco: Consultancy. Barranco:Senesco: Consultancy. Taylor:Senesco: Research Funding. Dondero:Senesco: Employment. Browne:Senesco: Employment. Kurman:Senesco: Consultancy. Lust:Senesco: PI Other.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document