Myeloid Derived Suppressor Cells (MDSCs) Regulate Tumor Growth, Immune Response and Regulatory T Cell (Treg) Development in the Multiple Myeloma Bone Marrow Microenvironment

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 565-565
Author(s):  
Gullu Topal Gorgun ◽  
Gregory Whitehill ◽  
Jennifer Lindsey Anderson ◽  
Teru Hideshima ◽  
Jacob P. Laubach ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Tumor Development ◽  
Suppressor Cells ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Healthy Donors

Abstract Abstract 565 Background: The interaction of myeloma (MM) cells with bone marrow accessory cells induces genomic, epigenomic and functional changes which promote tumor development, progression, cell adhesion mediated-drug resistance (CAM-DR), and immune suppression. As in other cancers, bidirectional interaction between MM cells and surrounding cells regulates tumor development on the one hand, while transforming the BM microenvironment into a tumor promoting and immune suppressive milieu on the other. Recent developments in targeted therapies have indicated that generation of the most effective therapeutic strategies requires not only targeting tumor or stroma cells, but also methods to overcome blockade of anti-tumor immune responses. In addition to lymphoid immune suppressor cells such as regulatory T cells (Tregs), distinct populations of myeloid cells such as myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) can effectively block anti-tumor immune responses, thereby representing an important obstacle for immunotherapy. While MDSCs are rare or absent in healthy individuals, increased numbers of MDSCs have been identified in tumor sites and peripheral circulation. Recent studies have in particular focused on MDSCs in the context of tumor promoting, immune suppressing, stroma in solid tumors. However, their presence and role in the tumor promoting, immune suppressive microenvironment in MM remains unclear. Methods: Here we assessed the presence, frequency, and functional characteristics of MDSCs in patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed MM compared to MM patients with response and healthy donors. We first identified a distinct MDSC population (CD11b+CD14−HLA-DR-/lowCD33+CD15+) with tumor promoting and immune suppressive activity in both PB and BM of MM patients. Moreover, we determined the immunomodulatory effects of lenalidomide and bortezomib on induction of MDSCs by MM cells, as well as on MDSC function. Results: MDSCs were significantly increased in both PB and BM of patients with active MM compared to healthy donors and MM in response (p<0.01). To determine whether the CD11b+CD14−HLA-DR-/lowCD33+CD15+ myeloid cell population represents functional MDSCs, we first assessed tumor promoting role of MDSCs in the MM microenvironment by culturing MM cell lines with MM patient bone marrow stroma cells (BMSC), with or without depletion of MDSCs. Importantly, BMSC-mediated MM growth decreased to baseline levels of MM cells alone when MDSCs were removed from the BMSC microenvironment. Moreover, MDSCs isolated from MM-BM using magnetic-Ab and/or FACS sorting cell separation, directly induced MM cell growth and survival, evidenced by 3H-thymidine incorporation and MTT assays. Since the interaction between tumor and stromal accessory cells is bidirectional, we next analysed the impact of MM cells on MDSC development. Importantly, MM cell lines cultured with PBMCs from healthy donors induced a 7 fold increase in MDSCs. We also examined the immune suppressive functions of MDSCs in cultures of autologous T cells with T cell stimulators, in the presence and absence of MDSCs from MM-PB or MM-BM. Freshly isolated MDSCs from both MM-PB and MM-BM induced significant inhibition of autologous T cell proliferation. Moreover, MDSC-associated immune inhibitory molecules arginase-1 (ARG-1) and reactive oxygen species (ROS), as well as inhibitory cytokines IL-6 and IL-10, were significantly increased in BM MDSCs, evidenced by intracellular flow cytometry analysis. In addition, MM BM MDSCs induced development of Treg from autologous naïve CD4+T cells. Finally, we analysed whether MDSCs impacted response to bortezomib and lenalidomide. Culture of MDSCs with MM cell lines, with or without bortezomib (5nM) and lenalidomide (1uM), demonstrated that less MM cell cytotoxicity in the presence of MDSCs. Conclusions: Our data show that MDSCs are increased in the MM microenvironment and mediate tumor growth and drug resistance, as well as immune suppression. Therefore targeting MDSCs represents a promising novel immune-based therapeutic strategy to both inhibit tumor cell growth and restore host immune function in MM. Disclosures: Raje: Onyx: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy; Acetylon: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Eli-Lilly: Research Funding. Munshi:Celgene: Consultancy; Millenium: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy. Richardson:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Johnson & Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Anderson:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Phase 1/2 Study of Nexi-001 Donor-Derived Multi-Antigen Specific CD8+ T Cells for the Treatment of Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Transplantation

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4819-4819
Author(s):  
Monzr M. Al Malki ◽  
Sumithira Vasu ◽  
Dipenkumar Modi ◽  
Miguel-Angel Perales ◽  
Lucy Y Ghoda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cd8 T Cells ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Over Time

Abstract Patients who relapse after allogeneic HCT have a poor prognosis and few effective treatment options. Responses to salvage therapy with donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) are driven by a graft versus leukemia (GvL) effect. However, relapses and moderate to severe graft versus host disease (GVHD) are common. Therapies that increase the GvL effect without inducing GVHD are needed. The NEXI-001 study is a prospective, multicenter, open-label phase 1/2 trial designed to characterize the safety, immunogenic, and antitumor activity of the NEXI-001 antigen specific T-cell product. This product is a donor-derived non-genetically engineered therapy that consists of populations of CD8+ T cells that recognize HLA 02.01-restricted peptides from the WT1, PRAME, and Cyclin A1 antigens. These T cells consist of populations with key memory phenotypes, including stem-like memory, central memory, and effector memory cells, with a low proportion (&lt;5%) of potentially allogeneic-reactive T-naïve cells. Patients enrolled into the first cohort of the dose escalation phase received a single infusion of 50 million (M) to 100M cells of the NEXI-001 product. Bridging anti-AML treatment was permitted during the manufacture of the cellular product with a wash-out period of at least 14 days prior to lymphodepletion (LD) chemotherapy (intravenous fludarabine 30 mg/m 2 and cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m 2) that was administered on Days -5, -4, and -3 prior to the infusion of the NEXI-001 product up to 72 hours later (Day1). Lymphocyte recovery to baseline levels occurred as early as three days after the NEXI-001 product infusion with robust CD4 and CD8 T cell reconstitution after LD chemotherapy. NEXI-001 antigen specific T cells were detectable in peripheral blood (PB) by multimer staining and were found to proliferate over time and to traffic to bone marrow. The phenotype composition of detectable antigen specific T cells at both sites was that of the infused product. T-cell receptor (TCR) sequencing assays revealed T cell clones in the NEXI-001 product that were not detected in PB of patients tested at baseline. These unique clones subsequently expanded in PB and bone marrow (BM) and persisted over time. Neutrophil recovery, decreased transfusion burden of platelets and red blood cells, and increased donor chimerism were observed. Decreases in myeloblasts and reduction in the size of an extramedullary myeloid sarcoma were suggestive of clinical activity. One patient, a 23-year- old with MRD+ disease at baseline, received two doses of 200M NEXI-001 cells separated by approximately 2 months. Following the first infusion, antigen specific CD8+ T cells increased gradually in PB to 9% of the total CD3+ T cell population just prior to the second infusion and were found to have trafficked to bone marrow. By Day 2 following the second infusion, which was not preceded by LD chemotherapy, the antigen specific CD8+ T cells again increased to 9% of the total CD3+ T cell population in PB and remained at ≥5% until the end of study visit a month later. The absolute lymphocyte count increased by 50% highlighting continued expansion of the NEXI-001 T cells. These cells also maintained significant Tscm populations. Treatment related adverse events, including infusion reactions, GVHD, CRS, and neurotoxicity (ICANS), have not developed in these patients who have received 50M to 200M T cells of the NEXI-001 product either as single or repeat infusions. In conclusion, these results show that infusion of the NEXI-001 product is safe and capable of generating a cell-mediated immune response with early signs of clinical activity. A second infusion is associated with increasing the level of antigen specific CD8+ T cells and their persistence in PB and BM. TCR sequencing and RNA Seq transcriptional profiling of the CD8+ T cells are planned, and these data will be available for presentation during the ASH conference. At least two cycles of 200M NEXI-001 cells weekly x 3 weeks of a 4-week cycle is planned for the next dose-escalation cohort. Early data suggest that the NEXI-001 product has the potential to enhance a GvL effect with minimal GVHD-associated toxicities. Disclosures Al Malki: Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy; Neximmune: Consultancy; Hansa Biopharma: Consultancy; CareDx: Consultancy; Rigel Pharma: Consultancy. Vasu: Boehringer Ingelheim: Other: Travel support; Seattle Genetics: Other: travel support; Kiadis, Inc.: Research Funding; Omeros, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Modi: MorphoSys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seagen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Research Funding. Perales: Sellas Life Sciences: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Other; Omeros: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria, Other; Equilium: Honoraria; MorphoSys: Honoraria; Kite/Gilead: Honoraria, Other; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Medigene: Honoraria; NexImmune: Honoraria; Cidara: Honoraria; Nektar Therapeutics: Honoraria, Other; Servier: Honoraria; Miltenyi Biotec: Honoraria, Other. Edavana: Neximmune, Inc: Current Employment. Lu: Neximmune, Inc: Current Employment. Kim: Neximmune, Inc: Current Employment. Suarez: Neximmune, Inc: Current Employment. Oelke: Neximmune, Inc: Current Employment. Bednarik: Neximmune, Inc: Current Employment. Knight: Neximmune, Inc: Current Employment. Varela: Kite: Speakers Bureau; Nexlmmune: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Targeting BTN2A1 By a Unique Activating Mab Improves Vγ9Vδ2 T Cell Cytotoxicity Against Primary Acute Lymphoblastic Blasts

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2302-2302
Author(s):  
Anne-Charlotte Le Floch ◽  
Caroline Imbert ◽  
Aude De Gassart ◽  
Florence Orlanducci ◽  
Aude Le Roy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Leukemic Cells ◽  
Target Cells ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Vγ9vδ2 T Cells ◽  
Privately Held

Abstract Introduction Vγ9Vδ2 T cells are new promising cytotoxic effectors in hematological malignancies. In acute myeloid leukemia and in non-Hodgkin lymphomas, Vγ9Vδ2 T cells-based immunotherapy has shown encouraging results both in preclinical models and in early phase clinical trials. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) includes very heterogeneous clinico-biological entities, for which recent immunotherapy approaches are currently being developed. Nevertheless, global prognosis of ALL patients still be poor with a 5 years-overall survival of less than 40% and therefore, treatments need to be improved. Very few data are currently available on susceptibility of ALL blasts to Vγ9Vδ2 T cell cytotoxic activity. Vγ9Vδ2 T cells are activated by phosphoantigens bound to BTN3A1 on target cells. BTN3A molecules are targeted at clinical level, with the ICT01 agonist monoclonal antibody (mAb), that is currently tested in a multicentric phase ½ study (EVICTION study). Biology of Vγ9Vδ2 T cells has recently undergone a new paradigm with the identification of BTN2A1 as the direct ligand for Vγ9 chain of γδ TCR. BTN2A1 is mandatory for Vγ9Vδ2 T cell activation but its precise role in modulating functions of Vγ9Vδ2 T cells remains unknown. Here, we show that allogenic and autologous Vγ9Vδ2 T cells exert cytolytic functions against ALL cell lines and primary ALL blasts, and we report that Vγ9Vδ2 T cell cytotoxic activity is enhanced after treatment with a unique agonist mAb targeting BTN2A1. Material and methods 5 ALL cell lines (697, RS4;11, NALM-6, HPB-ALL, SUP-T1) and PBMC from 11 adults ALL patients at diagnosis (B-ALL, T-ALL and Ph+ ALL) were tested in functional assays. We evaluated apoptosis of ALL cell lines and of primary ALL blasts after coculture with allogenic Vγ9Vδ2 T cells. ALL samples were also tested for their expansion capacities and a degranulation assay was performed at D14. We assessed in parallel relative quantification of the level expression of BTN2A1 (ICT0302 and 7.48 epitopes), and BTN3A (20.1 and 108.5 epitopes) on surface of ALL blasts. DAUDI-BTN2AKO+2A1 and HEK293-BTN2AKO+2A1 cells were used in binding assays, and modulation of TCR binding was assessed using recombinant tetramerized Vγ9Vδ2 TCR. Results We showed that Vγ9Vδ2 T cells exert spontaneous cytotoxicity against ALL cell lines and primary ALL blasts with a heterogeneous susceptibility depending on the target. We demonstrated that anti-BTN2A1 ICT0302 agonist mAb significantly enhanced Vγ9Vδ2 T cells mediated apoptosis in comparison to control condition, even for the less spontaneously susceptible cells. We confirmed these observations with degranulation of autologous Vγ9Vδ2 T cells expanded from 5 ALL patients at diagnosis that was increased after treatment with anti-BTN2A1 ICT0302 agonist mAb. BTN3A and BTN2A1 were detected on surface of ALL blasts, and BTN3A 108.5 was the most expressed epitope. Interestingly, we observed that anti-BTN2A1 ICT0302 strongly increased binding of a recombinant Vγ9Vδ2 TCR to target cells using with HEK293 and DAUDI cells. Discussion Our results highlighted that Vγ9Vδ2 T cells exert cytolytic functions against ALL cells, both in allogenic and autologous setting and demonstrated that BTN2A1 targeting with our unique agonist mAb could potentiate effector activities of Vγ9Vδ2 T cells against ALL blasts. These results indicate that the sensitization of leukemic cells can be induced by activation BTN3A as well as BTN2A1 mAbs. These data bring novel understanding on the biology of BTN2A1 on leukemic cells and our ability to enhance both binding and function. These findings could be of great interest for the design of innovative Vγ9Vδ2 T cells-based immunotherapy strategies for treating ALL that could be extended to other cancer types. Disclosures De Gassart: ImCheck Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company. Vey: Amgen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; BIOKINESIS: Consultancy, Research Funding; NOVARTIS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; SERVIER: Consultancy; JAZZ PHARMACEUTICALS: Honoraria; JANSSEN: Consultancy. Cano: ImCheck Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company. Olive: Emergence Therapeutics: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alderaan Biotechnology: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ImCheck Therapeutics: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. OffLabel Disclosure: Anti-BTN2A1 ICT0302 is a murine agonist monoclonal antibody targeting BTN2A1 whose aim is to increase Vgamma9Vdelta2 T cells functions.

scholarly journals Flotetuzumab (FLZ), an Investigational CD123 x CD3 Bispecific Dart® Protein-Induced Clustering of CD3+ T Cells and CD123+ AML Cells in Bone Marrow Biopsies Is Associated with Response to Treatment in Primary Refractory AML Patients

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1410-1410 ◽  
Author(s):  
John E. Godwin ◽  
Carmen Ballesteros-Merino ◽  
Nikhil Lonberg ◽  
Shawn Jensen ◽  
Tarsem Moudgil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Refractory Aml

Introduction The infiltration of immune cells into tumors has been associated with therapeutic effects in preclinical models and patients with cancer. In AML, we have previously reported that immune infiltrated TME is predictive of failure to cytotoxic chemotherapy, but associated with response to immunotherapy, specifically FLZ (Uy ASH 2018, Rutella ASH 2018). Furthermore, FLZ also affects immune infiltration in the TME (Rutella ASH 2018). NK cells play an important role in AML control (Ruggieri Science 2012). FLZ (MGD006/S80880) is a humanized DART® molecule that bridges CD123 on AML with CD3 on T cells and mediates anticancer activity via T-cell activation and cytolytic activity against the bound cancer cell. While this is well described in vitro, little evidence of this interaction is available in vivo. Methods Patients (pts) were treated on the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of FLZ (multi-step lead-in dose followed by 500ng/kg/day, in 28-day cycles). We studied the bone marrow (BM) tissue samples for 6 primary refractory pts at baseline and after treatment. Response assessment was performed at day 25±3 days of each cycle. Serial BM samples were evaluated using 2 different staining panels (PD-L1, FoxP3, CD8, CD3, CD103 / CD123, CD3, CD57, CD16) on consecutive slides. Slides were stained using a Leica BondRx autostainer and fluorescence imaged using a Polaris Vectra 3 and analyzed using inForm software. A density-based clustering algorithm developed and run in QuPath was used to quantify CD3+ T cell clusters. Results Six pts with primary refractory AML were included in this report. Pts were heavily pretreated (median prior lines of therapy was 3, range 2-9), and had adverse cytogenetic risk (ELN 2017). Three pts had a complete remission (CR) after 1 cycle of therapy (CR, CRh, CRi), two went on the receive allogeneic stem cell transplant (HSCT). In baseline BM samples, CD3 and CD8 cell infiltrates were higher in CR vs non-responders (CD3+ 18.3% ±6.9 vs 9.3% ±1.8; CD8+ 9.4% ±3.5 vs 4.8% ±1.2; mean±SEM). Two of the three CR patients, who underwent HSCT, developed clusters (Figure 1) in their on-treatment biopsies with 65 and 22 clusters of an average of 34 and 17 T cells per cluster, respectively. All clusters in CR pts were found on or adjacent to CD123+ cells. The BM biopsy of the CR pt with no detected clusters had no unequivocal evidence of residual/recurrent leukemic blasts. This pt had their dose interrupted early due to non-treatment related AE (infectious complication) and did not receive a full cycle of treatment; the response was transient and the pt relapsed shortly thereafter. NK cells (CD57+CD16+) were increased in post treatment biopsies of CR vs non-responders (0.93 ±0.31 vs 0.27 ±0.13; mean±SEM) with the largest fold increase in CR (28 vs 9). Lastly, post treatment biopsy PD-L1 expression was higher in non-responders than CR (23% vs 16%) with non-responders exhibiting the largest fold change in total PD-L1+ cells (10.9 vs 2.2). Summary Consistent with its proposed mechanism of action, these data highlight for the first time, the dynamic induction of an increase in T-cell infiltration, and clustering around CD123 AML cells in the bone marrow microenvironment of two AML patients that responded to FLZ. In pts with resistance to FLZ (non-responders) PD-L1 induction was significantly higher indicating that in some pts treatment with sequential check point inhibitor could obviate this mechanism of resistance A trial combining FLZ with sequential administration of a PD-1 inhibitor (MGA012) is currently recruiting pts. Figure 1. Baseline and on-treatment IHC of BM biopsies of a FLZ-treated CR pt showing cluster formation following treatment. Disclosures Bifulco: Ventana: Other: advisory board; PrimeVax: Equity Ownership, Other: ScientificBoard; BMS: Other: Advisory Board; Providnece: Patents & Royalties: Imaging processing; Halio Dx: Other: advisory board. Wigginton:macrogenics: Employment, Equity Ownership; western oncolytics: Consultancy, Other: consultancy. Muth:MacroGenics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Davidson-Moncada:MacroGenics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Fox:Akoya: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Definiens: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Macrogenics: Research Funding; Ultivue: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Mass Cytometry Identifies Immunomic Shifts in the Bone Marrow Microenvironment of Multiple Myeloma and Light Chain Amyloidosis after Standard of Care First Line Therapies

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1879-1879 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taxiarchis Kourelis ◽  
Jose C Villasboas ◽  
Surendra Dasari ◽  
Angela Dispenzieri ◽  
Shaji K. Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
T Cells ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Cd8 T Cells ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Mass Cytometry ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Healthy Donors

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Traditional cytometry methods have been unable to capture the immense heterogeneity of the tumor immune microenvironment in various malignancies including multiple myeloma (MM). Cytometry by time of flight (CyTOF) can, to some extent, overcome this limitation. However, the computational challenges that come with analyzing these complex datasets in a reproducible manner remain. In this study, using a large cohort of patients, we compare the bone marrow immunomes from patients with MGUS, multiple myeloma (MM), smoldering MM (SMM) and light chain amyloidosis (AL) at diagnosis, after induction therapy with lenalidomide and dexamethasone and after autologous transplant (ASCT). METHODS: We studied a total of 118 cryopreserved samples as follows: 14 healthy donors, 43 AL (27 newly diagnosed-ND, of which 13 with <10% bone marrow plasma cells, 16 matched samples post ASCT), 12 with ND MGUS, 11 with SMM (of which 6 were ND), 14 with ND MM, 13 paired MM samples post induction therapy and 11 paired MM samples post ASCT. Our CyTOF surface staining panel included the following 33 markers: CD45, HLA-DR, CD19, CD3, CD4, CD8, CD14, CCR6, CD11a, Cd123, CCR5, CD7, ICOS, CD25, CD57, CD45RA, CD163, PD-1, PDL-1, CXCR3, CCR4, CCR7, CD28, CTLA4, CD11c, CD56, CD45RO, CD44, CD27, CD138, CD38, CD-127 and CD16. Data processing and analysis was performed using Cytobank. Live cells were identified based on Pt195 and Ir193 staining. Myeloma cells and CD45- cells were excluded and only CD45+ cells were used for subsequent analyses. Single-cell data were downsampled using VisNE, a permutation of t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (tSNE) and clustered using CITRUS (using 10,000 events per sample with a minimum cluster size of 1%). A Significance analysis of microarrays (SAM) analysis was performed to ascertain differences between groups. Significance was inferred for a false discovery rate <1% . All CITRUS analyses were repeated at least 3 times and only clusters found to differ consistently across runs were considered. RESULTS: The proportions of immune subsets identified to vary by CITRUS before and after induction therapy and ASCT for MM and AL are shown in the table. No differences were identified between MGUS, SMM and NDMM. The proportion of a subset (369850) of CD14+/C16- monocytes, a group of cells shown to correlate positively with survival and response to therapy in solid malignancies, increased after induction therapy in MM. Naïve B cells increased dramatically post ASCT in both AL (429918) and MM (369948), consistent with expected immune reconstitution patterns, although a CCR6+ B Cell subset (429940) shown to mediate effective antibody responses, decreased (in grey). A subset (369980) of functionally exhausted (PD1/CTLA4+) central memory (CM) CD4 T cells decreased after induction therapy in MM but recovered early post ASCT whereas a CM CD4+ subset (369986) lacking major activation markers (CD28, CD25) decreased gradually with therapy and post ASCT. A subset (369953) of naïve CD8 T cells shown to be actively recruited in tumor sites (CXCR3+) decreased after ASCT. CD57+ senescent effector memory (EM) CD8 T cells (369962) decreased with induction therapy but recovered post ASCT. EM CD8 T cells associated with long term immune memory (CCR5+, CD127+, cluster 369959), also decreased after ASCT. LIMITATIONS: Include a) No barcoding b) batch effects were difficult to avoid when processing large number of samples c) use of cryopreserved samples d) need for downsampling to cope with the computational burden. The latter could have been one of the reasons we did not identify any differences between MGUS, SMM and MM. At the time of the meeting we will present confirmatory analyses using conceptually different methods of clustering and of performing across group comparisons as well as analyses that do not include downsampling. CONCLUSIONS: Mass cytometry can provide a more granular view of the bone marrow immunome in plasma cell dyscrasias. Novel agent induction therapy can create an immunologically favorable anti-tumor microenvironment although, in some cases, these favorable immunomic shifts are temporarily reversed by ASCT. Confirmatory analyses, baseline immune profiles, comparisons with healthy donors and correlation with other clinically relevant patient characteristics and outcomes will be reported at the meeting. Disclosures Dispenzieri: Celgene, Takeda, Prothena, Jannsen, Pfizer, Alnylam, GSK: Research Funding. Kumar:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; KITE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Vecabrutinib Is Efficacious In Vivo in a Preclinical CLL Adoptive Transfer Model

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1868-1868 ◽  
Author(s):  
Billy Michael Chelliah Jebaraj ◽  
Annika Scheffold ◽  
Eugen Tausch ◽  
Judith A. Fox ◽  
Pietro Taverna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cd8 T Cells ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Tumor Burden ◽  
Transfer Model ◽  
Advisory Committees

Abstract B cell receptor signaling (BCR) in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) drives tumor cell proliferation and survival. Inhibition of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK), a key enzyme in the BCR pathway, has proved to be efficacious even in poor-risk and chemo-refractory patients. However resistance to the BTK inhibitor ibrutinib has been shown to emerge in a subset of CLL patients. Of importance, the C481S BTK mutation conferred resistance by preventing the covalent binding of ibrutinib to its target cysteine 481 in BTK. Vecabrutinib (formerly known as SNS-062, a succinate salt) is a novel, highly potent, next generation noncovalent BTK inhibitor which demonstrated biochemical and cellular activity against C481S BTK mutant in vitro. However, the efficacy of vecabrutinib and its impact on the T-cell microenvironment has not been studied in in vivo preclinical CLL models. In the present study, the efficacy of vecabrutinib was investigated using the Eµ-TCL1 adoptive transfer model. Mice were randomized to treatment with either 40mg/kg vecabrutinib succinate, twice daily by oral gavage (n=6) or vehicle control (n=6). The mice were sacrificed after 2 weeks of treatment and changes in tumor burden as well as alterations in T-cell microenvironment were analysed in detail. Treatment with vecabrutinib decreased tumor burden as observed by a significant decrease in WBC count (36.5 vs. 17.1 giga/L; P=0.002), spleen weight (median 0.56g vs. 0.31g; P=0.005) and liver weight (median 1.5g vs. 1.2g; P=0.005) compared to vehicle treatment. Correspondingly, the CD5+ CD19+ tumor cells were significantly decreased in blood (P=0.002) and spleen (P=0.002) while no significant difference was observed in bone marrow (P=0.818) upon treatment with vecabrutinib. Since BTK inhibition is known to reshape the tumor microenvironment, we studied the impact of vecabrutinib specifically on T-cell subsets. Firstly, no difference in the proportions of CD4 or CD8 expressing T-cells was observed in mice treated with vehicle or vecabrutinib. However, of interest, the percentage of CD4+ CD25+ FoxP3+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) were significantly decreased upon treatment with vecabrutinib in peripheral blood (P=0.026) and spleen (P=0.009). The decrease in Tregs was due to reduced proliferation of these cells upon exposure to the drug as measured by Ki-67 staining. Also, the Tregs expressing the maturation and activation markers such as CD103 and GITR were significantly decreased in blood and spleen upon drug treatment. Further, we analysed the changes in CD8 T-cell subsets following treatment with vecabrutinib. Treatment with the drug resulted in expansion of the CD127+ CD44- naïve CD8 T-cells in blood, bone marrow and spleen (all P values 0.002) while the CD127+ CD44+ memory CD8 T-cells were significantly decreased in bone marrow and spleen (all P values 0.009). Also, the CD127low CD44int-hi effector CD8 T-cells were decreased in blood (P=0.004), bone marrow (P=0.004) and spleen (P=0.002) upon vecabrutinib treatment. Therefore, vecabrutinib treatment did not alter the percentage of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in mice however, significant changes in the subset composition of the CD4 and CD8 T cells were observed. Lastly, to analyse the impact of vecabrutinib on survival, a cohort of mice (n=12) were transplanted with 5 million splenic tumor cells isolated from Eµ-TCL1 transgenic mice. After allowing for engraftment, the mice were randomized to treatment with the drug (n=6) or vehicle (n=6). Of note, the mice treated with the drug showed a significant increase in survival (median 35 days from transplant; P<0.001) compared to treatment with vehicle (median 28 days). In summary, vecabrutinib was efficacious in vivo in a preclinical CLL adoptive transfer model, decreasing tumor burden in different organs and significantly improving survival. Treatment with the drug altered the T-cell architecture in vivo. Of interest, the immunosuppressive Tregs, which protect the tumor from immune surveillance were decreased in various tissue compartments; however, a decrease in the effector CD8 T cells might impact anti-tumor immunity if there is a consistent effect upon drug treatment. Vecabrutinib antitumor activity and effects on T-cell populations in vivo in this preclinical CLL model are intriguing, merits further investigation and supports the ongoing phase 1b/2 study in patients with previously treated B-lymphoid malignancies (NCT03037645). Disclosures Tausch: AbbVie: Consultancy, Other: Travel grants; Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Travel grants; Gilead: Consultancy, Other: Travel grants. Fox:Sunesis Pharmaceuticals: Employment; Amphivena Therapeutics: Employment. Taverna:Sunesis Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Stilgenbauer:Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Hoffmann La-Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genzyme: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmcyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Mapping the Multiple Myeloma T Cell Landscape By Immunotherapeutic Perturbation Reveals Mechanism and Determinants of Response to Bispecific T Cell Engagers

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 731-731
Author(s):  
Mirco Friedrich ◽  
Paola Neri ◽  
Noemie Leblay ◽  
Niklas Kehl ◽  
Julius Michel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Medicinal Product ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Investigational Medicinal Product ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
T Cell Clones ◽  
Cell Clones

Abstract Immunotherapies have transformed the clinical care of patients with cancer. Bispecific T cell engagers (TCEs) have recently entered early-phase clinical trials of multiple myeloma (MM) and shown remarkable response rates even in heavily pretreated patients. However, T cells are heterogeneous with respect to phenotype, function and specificity for tumor antigens and currently we have limited understanding how to identify and monitor tumor specific T cells in hematological malignancies. It is furthermore unclear why individual patients fail to elicit an antitumor immune response upon treatment with TCEs and whether a persistent T cell response to TCEs relies on reinvigoration of pre-existing tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes or on recruitment of novel T cells. Here we performed longitudinal paired single-cell RNA and T cell receptor (TCR) sequencing on &gt;100,000 immune cells from patients with MM before, during and after TCE therapy. We defined transcriptional gradients of MM-infiltrating immune cells between n=5 healthy bone marrow donors, n=10 newly diagnosed MM patients and n=11 refractory MM patients undergoing immunotherapy with bispecific BCMA-targeting antibodies. By tracking T cell clones over time using their TCR as individual barcode, we further integrated these longitudinal in vivo data with protein-level analysis and functional validation in MM bone-marrow cultures exposed to TCEs. Refractory MM patients exhibited a highly individual bone-marrow immune composition, that was significantly perturbed compared to healthy or diseased, but therapy-naïve bone marrow. We observed that the inter-patient heterogeneity in the T cell landscape composition is superimposed by conserved TCR repertoire dynamics forming a trajectory between early anti-tumor effector states and exhaustion. In all patients, we observed a dichotomy of TCE-responsive versus TCE-refractory T cell clones. Longitudinal tracking of TCE-responsive T cell clones and their transcriptional phenotypes revealed coupling of tumor recognition, clonal expansion and T cell dysfunction marked by expression of cytotoxicity (GZMB, GNLY) and terminal exhaustion markers, such as TOX and CD39. Significant clonal replacement of T cells was evident in n=5 clinically responding patients with MM throughout continued TCE therapy and driven by a subset of non-exhausted, naïve-like CD8 + T cells. The top 1% TCE-responsive clones were fate-determined and either followed a memory-exhaustion or cytotoxicity trajectory. Patients who did not respond to TCE therapy exhibited a dysfunctional T cell landscape before therapy that limited clonal expansion and TCR persistence. As proof-of-concept, we matched single-cell profiling data of n=10 individual patients with protein-level analysis and functional validation of TCE-driven T cell expansion in vitro, providing the first signals of preferential expansion of specific fate- and avidity-determined clones upon TCE-mediated stimulation. We propose the mode of action of TCE therapy in MM to be driven by pre-existing T cell fate commitments that determine clonotype diversification and persistence, and ultimately, clinical response. Our results further demonstrate that clinical TCE response derives from a distinct repertoire of pre-existing T cell clones, whereas other clonotypes are functionally excluded from the repertoire and subsequently lost during therapy. We define the determinants of response to TCE treatment to be inherent to the individual's T cell repertoire before therapy. Our results provide the rationale for response prediction and monitoring of future immunotherapy approaches in MM patients beyond TCE therapy. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Neri: BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Goldschmidt: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Grants and/or Provision of Investigational Medicinal Product, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnology: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Grants and/or Provision of Investigational Medicinal Product, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Grants and/or Provision of Investigational Medicinal Product, Research Funding; Chugai: Honoraria, Other: Grants and/or Provision of Investigational Medicinal Product, Research Funding; GSK: Honoraria; Incyte: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Grants and/or Provision of Investigational Medicinal Product, Research Funding; Johns Hopkins University: Other: Grant; Molecular Partners: Research Funding; MSD: Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Dietmar-Hopp-Foundation: Other: Grant; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Grants and/or Provision of Investigational Medicinal Product, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding. Weinhold: Sanofi: Honoraria. Raab: Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy; GSK: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bahlis: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genentech: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria.

scholarly journals Phase 1 Study of CART-Ddbcma, a CAR-T Therapy Utilizing a Novel Synthetic Binding Domain for the Treatment of Subjects with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2-2
Author(s):  
Matthew J Frigault ◽  
Michael R. Bishop ◽  
Elizabeth K. O'Donnell ◽  
Noopur S. Raje ◽  
Allegra Mondillo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Private Company ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T

Introduction: Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T cell therapies directed against B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) have demonstrated compelling clinical activity and manageable safety in subjects with relapsed and refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM). These CAR T cells encode humanized or murine scFvs, or camelid heavy chain antibody fragments with CD3-zeta in combination with 41BB or CD28 co-stimulatory domains. In contrast, CART-ddBCMA is an anti-BCMA investigational CAR T cell therapy encoding a non-scFv, synthetic binding domain targeting BCMA with a 4-1BB costimulatory motif and CD3-zeta T cell activation domain. The binding domain is a small stable protein comprising 73 amino acids engineered to reduce the risk of immunogenicity. CART-ddBCMA is being studied as part of a Master Phase 1 Cell Therapy protocol for RRMM and is a first-in-human clinical study to assess the safety, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, efficacy, and duration of effect. Methods: ARC-101 (NCT04155749), ARM 1 (CART-ddBCMA) is a Phase 1, multi-center, open label, dose escalation trial enrolling approximately 12 subjects with RRMM who have received ≥ 3 prior regimens, including a proteasome inhibitor, an immuno-modulatory agent, and a CD38 antibody or are triple-refractory. There is no prescreening or requirement for BCMA expression on tumor cells. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells are collected via leukapheresis and sent to a central facility for selection, transduction, and expansion on the CliniMACS Prodigy® system. The drug product is cryopreserved and undergoes release testing prior to being returned to the site for infusion. Subjects undergo lymphodepletion with fludarabine (30 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (300 mg/m2) daily for 3 days, then receive CART-ddBCMA as a single infusion. Planned dose levels are 100, 300, and 900 x 106 CAR+ T cells. The primary outcome measure is incidence of adverse events (AEs), including dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Additional outcome measures are quality and duration of clinical response assessed according to the IMWG Uniform Response Criteria for MM, evaluation of minimal residual disease (MRD), progression-free and overall survival, and quantification of CAR+ cells in blood. Results: As of July 1, 2020, 4 subjects (median age 73.5 [min;max 73 to 75]) were enrolled and 4 received CART-ddBCMA. Median follow-up after CART-ddBCMA infusion was 100 days (min:max 9 to 142 days), 3 subjects were evaluable for initial safety and clinical response and 1 subject was pending assessment. All subjects received a dose of 100 x 106 CAR+ T cells±20%, median drug product CAR+ expression was 76% (min:max 72-78%) of total CD3+ T cells. Subjects had a median of 5 (min;max 5 to 7) prior lines of therapy and one had prior autologous stem cell transplant; one had high-risk cytogenetics. All 4 subjects had previously received Bort/Len/Car/Pom/Dara and 2 were penta-refractory. Three subjects had high tumor burden, with 95, 95, and 70% bone marrow plasma cells pre-infusion, respectively. Three subjects developed Grade 2 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and 1 subject developed Grade 2 ICANS. These adverse effects resolved quickly after intervention; 3 subjects received tocilizumab and 2 received steroids (dexamethasone). All 3 evaluable subjects have demonstrated clinical response per IMWG criteria: currently 1 sCR (MRD-10-4), 1 sCR, 1 sCR (MRD-10-6). MRD negative results were obtained by next-generation sequencing (Adaptive clonoSEQ), 1 subject did not have baseline bone marrow involvement. Extramedullary disease resolved in three subjects. CAR+ T cell expansion during the first 30 days was observed in evaluable subjects by ddPCR. No post treatment ADA were detected in the first 3 subjects, through M1. Conclusions: In the initial cohort receiving 100 x 106 CAR+ T cells of CART-ddBCMA, no subjects experienced severe CRS and/or ICANs. Early efficacy results are encouraging, with all 3 evaluable subjects demonstrating deep clinical responses of sCR, with 2 MRD negative bone marrow responses at 1 month. No evidence of ADA has been detected to date. These data are encouraging in a small group of elderly subjects who did not initially receive autologous transplant following induction therapy. Subjects continue to be enrolled and treated. Additional subjects, and longer follow-up will establish whether treatment with CART-ddBCMA results in durable CAR+ T responses. Disclosures Frigault: Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Arcellx: Consultancy; Gilead/Kite: Consultancy, Research Funding. Bishop:Kite: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Autolus: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; CRSPPR Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. O'Donnell:Celgene: Consultancy. Raje:Celgene: Consultancy. LeFleur:Arcellx: Current Employment, Current equity holder in private company. Buonato:arcellx: Current Employment, Current equity holder in private company. Edwards:arcellx: Current Employment, Current equity holder in private company. Richman:arcellx: Current equity holder in private company. Polianova:arcellx: Current Employment, Current equity holder in private company. Sabatino:Arcellx: Current equity holder in private company. Currence:Arcellx: Current Employment, Current equity holder in private company. Shen:Arcellx: Current Employment, Current equity holder in private company. Quigley:Arcellx: Current Employment, Current equity holder in private company. Maus:arcellx: Consultancy, Research Funding; kite: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding.

scholarly journals T Cell Immunity Toward Viral- and Tumor-Antigens Is Preserved in MDS Patients

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4225-4225
Author(s):  
Hussein Hamad ◽  
Wingchi K Leung ◽  
Spyridoula Vasileiou ◽  
Shivani Mukhi ◽  
Quillan Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Healthy Donor ◽  
Tumor Antigens ◽  
Ex Vivo ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Cell Immunity ◽  
Healthy Donors ◽  
T Cell Lines

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a heterogeneous group of disorders characterized by bone marrow failure and a propensity to progress to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). A core component of the underlying pathogenesis in MDS is deregulation of inflammatory cytokines, such as tumor growth factor-β (TGFβ), which impact the function of immune cells and hence their capacity to mount anti-infective or anti-tumor responses. However, little is known about antigen-specific T cell function in patients with MDS. We hypothesized that virus-specific T cell (VST) function might be preserved in patients with MDS, and that the functional capacity of T cells reactive against tumor-associated antigens aberrantly overexpressed by clonal MDS cells such as Cyclin A1 (CCNA1) and Proteinase (PR3) might also be preserved and exploited for immunotherapeutic purposes. Following informed consent, we collected peripheral blood samples from 10 patients (pts) with MDS and 17 healthy donors. Most pts (9 out of 10) were transfusion dependent and 3 subsequently underwent an allogeneic HSCT. Table 1 summarizes the other clinical characteristics, karyotypic and mutational profile at the time of blood collection. Compared with T cells isolated from healthy donors, MDS patient-derived T cells had a similar CD4 to CD8 ratio (1.5-2.5:1 for healthy donors and 3:1 for MDS pts), but displayed a more exhausted profile at baseline (CD3+TIM3+: 1% in healthy donors and 5% in MDS pts) and produced higher levels of inflammatory cytokines [IFNγ (18±3pg/ml vs 36±16pg/ml, healthy donor vs MDS; p=0.12), and IL-8 (56±32 vs 704±446 pg/ml, p=0.01)]. Next, to assess the capacity of MDS pts to mount ex vivo functional virus-directed responses, we stimulated patient-derived PBMCs (n=5) with overlapping peptide libraries (pepmixes) spanning immunogenic AdV, CMV, EBV, BK and HHV-6 antigens. Similar to healthy donor-derived T cell lines (n=5, 3 specific for 4 viruses and 2 for 5 viruses), all 5 MDS patient-derived lines demonstrated specificity for one or more of the target viruses (1 for 5 viruses, 1 for 4, 2 for 3 and 1 for 1 virus) as observed by IFNγ ELISpot assay with comparable magnitude (range Adv: 43-730 vs 384-941 in healthy donors, CMV: 0-1599 vs 0-3002, EBV: 0-1486 vs 0-541, BK: 0-839 vs 38-275 and HHV6: 0-794 vs 5-407 SFU/2x105 cells, respectively). We next examined the feasibility of expanding autologous MDS-antigen directed T cell products (n=10) to determine whether an adoptive immunotherapeutic approach might be applicable for MDS treatment. Thus, we exposed patient-derived PBMCs to autologous dendritic cells (DC) loaded with pepmixes spanning 6 MDS-associated antigens (CCNA1, survivin, WT1, PRAME, PR3 and NYESO1). After 3 rounds of stimulation, the products obtained were predominantly CD3+ T cells (mean 88±1.3%) that were polyclonal (CD4: 46±5% and CD8: 41±4%) containing predominantly memory T cells (TEM: 36±6% TCM: 37±5% and Tnaïve =13±3%). Six lines (60%) showed specific recognition to at least one of the target antigens: 4 lines specific for PRAME, 1 for CCNA1, 1 for WT1 and 1 for NYESO1 (range 0-40, 0-184, 0-1386 and 0-179 SFU/2x105 cells, respectively by IFNγ ELIspot). T cell lines were capable of specifically secreting multiple effector cytokines in response to targets (TNFα: 12% and IFNγ: 16% in response to PRAME in a representative patient-derived T cell line). Furthermore, this line was capable of killing PRAME+ targets in a 4hr 51Cr release assay [60% specific lysis, E:T 20:1]. In conclusion, functional virus-directed T cell immunity in patients with MDS is preserved, potentially explaining the lower rates of viral reactivation seen in these patients compared with other infections. Moreover, T cells specific for MDS-expressed tumor antigens can also be successfully expanded ex vivo from patients. Taken together this raises the possibility of applying an adoptive immunotherapeutic approach for the treatment of MDS. Disclosures Ramos: Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Tessa Therapeutics: Research Funding. Leen:Allovir: Consultancy, Other: Cofounder, Ownership Interest; Marker Therapeutics: Consultancy, Other: Cofounder, Ownership Interest.

scholarly journals Automated Manufacture of Matched Donor-Derived Allogeneic CD19 CAR T-Cells for Relapsed/Refractory B-ALL Following Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation: Toxicity, Efficacy and the Important Role of Lymphodepletion

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 776-776
Author(s):  
Claire Roddie ◽  
Maeve A O'Reilly ◽  
Maria A V Marzolini ◽  
Leigh Wood ◽  
Juliana Dias Alves Pinto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T ◽  
Peak Car ◽  
Matched Donor

Introduction: 2nd generation CD19 CAR T cells show unprecedented efficacy in B-ALL, but several challenges remain: (1) scaling manufacture to meet patient need and (2) feasibility of generating products from lymphopenic patients post allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT). To overcome these issues we propose: (1) use of the CliniMACS Prodigy (Miltenyi Biotec), a semi-automated cGMP platform that simplifies CAR T cell manufacture and (2) the use of matched donor T cells to overcome the challenge posed by patient lymphopenia, albeit this may come with a heightened risk of graft versus host disease (GvHD). CARD (NCT02893189) is a Phase I study of matched donor derived CD19 CAR T cells generated on the CliniMACS Prodigy in 14 adult patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) B ALL following allo-SCT. We additionally explore the requirement for lymphodepletion (LD) in the allogeneic CAR T cell setting and report on the incidence of GvHD with this therapy. Methods: Manufacturing: CARD utilises non-mobilised matched donor leucapheresate to manufacture 2nd generation CD19CAR T cells using a closed CliniMACS® Prodigy/ TransACTTM process. Study design: Eligible subjects are aged 16-70y with r/r B ALL following allo SCT. Study endpoints include feasibility of CD19CAR T cell manufacture from allo-SCT donors on the CliniMACS Prodigy and assessments of engraftment and safety including GvHD. To assess the requirement for LD prior to CD19CAR T cells in lymphopenic post-allo-SCT patients, the study is split into Cohort 1 (no LD) and Cohort 2 (fludarabine (30 mg/m2 x3) and cyclophosphamide (300mg/m2 x3)). To mitigate for the potential GvHD risk, cell dosing on study mirrors conventional donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) schedules and is based on total CD3+ (not CAR T) cell numbers: Dose 1=1x106/kg CD3+ T cells; Dose 2= 3x106/kg CD3+ T cells; Dose 3= 1x107/kg CD3+ T cells. Results: As of 26 July 2019, 17 matched allo SCT donors were leukapheresed and 16 products were successfully manufactured and QP released. Patient demographics are as follows: (1) median patient age was 43y (range 19-64y); (2) 4/17 had prior blinatumomab and 5/17 prior inotuzumab ozogamicin; (3) 7/17 had myeloablative allo SCT and 10/17 reduced intensity allo SCT of which 6/17 were sibling donors and 12/17 were matched unrelated donors. No patients with haploidentical transplant were enrolled. To date, 12/16 patients have received at least 1 dose of CD19CAR T cells: 7/16 on Cohort 1 and 5/16 on Cohort 2 (2/16 are pending infusion on Cohort 2 and 2/16 died of fungal infection prior to infusion). Median follow-up for all 12 patients is 22.9 months (IQR 2.9-25.9; range 0.7 - 25.9). At the time of CAR T cell infusion, 7/12 patients were in morphological relapse with &gt;5% leukemic blasts. Despite this, CD19CAR T cells were administered safely: only 2/12 patients experienced Grade 3 CRS (UPenn criteria), both in Cohort 1, which fully resolved with Tocilizumab and corticosteroids. No patients experienced ≥Grade 3 neurotoxicity and importantly, no patients experienced clinically significant GvHD. In Cohort 1 (7 patients), median peak CAR expansion by flow was 87 CD19CAR/uL blood whereas in Cohort 2 (5 patients to date), median peak CAR expansion was 1309 CD19CAR/uL blood. This difference is likely to reflect the use of LD in Cohort 2. CAR T cell persistence by qPCR in Cohort 1 is short, with demonstrable CAR in only 2/7 treated patients at Month 2. Data for Cohort 2 is immature, but this will also be reported at the meeting in addition to potential mechanisms underlying the short persistence observed in Cohort 1. Of the 10 response evaluable patients (2/12 pending marrow assessment), 9/10 (90%) achieved flow/molecular MRD negative CR at 6 weeks. 2/9 responders experienced CD19 negative relapse (one at M3, one at M5) and 3/9 responders experienced CD19+ relapse (one at M3, one at M9, one at M12). 4/10 (40%) response evaluable patients remain on study and continue in flow/molecular MRD negative remission at a median follow up of 11.9 months (range 2.9-25.9). Conclusions: Donor-derived matched allogeneic CD19 CAR T cells are straightforward to manufacture using the CliniMACS Prodigy and deliver excellent early remission rates, with 90% MRD negative CR observed at Week 6 in the absence of severe CAR associated toxicity or GvHD. Peak CAR expansion appears to be compromised by the absence of LD and this may lead to a higher relapse rate. Updated results from Cohorts 1 and 2 will be presented. Disclosures Roddie: Novartis: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. O'Reilly:Kite Gilead: Honoraria. Farzaneh:Autolus Ltd: Equity Ownership, Research Funding. Qasim:Autolus: Equity Ownership; Orchard Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; UCLB: Other: revenue share eligibility; Servier: Research Funding; Bellicum: Research Funding; CellMedica: Research Funding. Linch:Autolus: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Pule:Autolus: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Peggs:Gilead: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Autolus: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Identification of Two CAR T-Cell Populations Associated with Complete Response or Progressive Disease in Adult Lymphoma Patients Treated with Axi-Cel

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 779-779 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zinaida Good ◽  
Jay Y. Spiegel ◽  
Bita Sahaf ◽  
Meena B. Malipatlolla ◽  
Matthew J. Frank ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Scientific Advisory Board ◽  
Car T ◽  
Scientific Advisory

Axicabtagene ciloleucel (Axi-cel) is an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy approved for the treatment of relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (r/r DLBCL). Long-term analysis of the ZUMA-1 phase 1-2 clinical trial showed that ~40% of Axi-cel patients remained progression-free at 2 years (Locke et al., Lancet Oncology 2019). Those patients who achieved a complete response (CR) at 6 months generally remained progression-free long-term. The biological basis for achieving a durable CR in patients receiving Axi-cel remains poorly understood. Here, we sought to identify CAR T-cell intrinsic features associated with CR at 6 months in DLBCL patients receiving commercial Axi-cel at our institution. Using mass cytometry, we assessed expression of 33 surface or intracellular proteins relevant to T-cell function on blood collected before CAR T cell infusion, on day 7 (peak expansion), and on day 21 (late expansion) post-infusion. To identify cell features that distinguish patients with durable CR (n = 11) from those who developed progressive disease (PD, n = 14) by 6 months following Axi-cel infusion, we performed differential abundance analysis of multiparametric protein expression on CAR T cells. This unsupervised analysis identified populations on day 7 associated with persistent CR or PD at 6 months. Using 10-fold cross-validation, we next fitted a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (lasso) model that identified two clusters of CD4+ CAR T cells on day 7 as potentially predictive of clinical outcome. The first cluster identified by our model was associated with CR at 6 months and had high expression of CD45RO, CD57, PD1, and T-bet transcription factor. Analysis of protein co-expression in this cluster enabled us to define a simple gating scheme based on high expression of CD57 and T-bet, which captured a population of CD4+ CAR T cells on day 7 with greater expansion in patients experiencing a durable CR (mean±s.e.m. CR: 26.13%±2.59%, PD: 10.99%±2.53%, P = 0.0014). In contrast, the second cluster was associated with PD at 6 months and had high expression of CD25, TIGIT, and Helios transcription factor with no CD57. A CD57-negative Helios-positive gate captured a population of CD4+ CAR T cells was enriched on day 7 in patients who experienced progression (CR: 9.75%±2.70%, PD: 20.93%±3.70%, P = 0.016). Co-expression of CD4, CD25, and Helios on these CAR T cells highlights their similarity to regulatory T cells, which could provide a basis for their detrimental effects. In this exploratory analysis of 25 patients treated with Axi-cel, we identified two populations of CD4+ CAR T cells on day 7 that were highly associated with clinical outcome at 6 months. Ongoing analyses are underway to fully characterize this dataset, to explore the biological activity of the populations identified, and to assess the presence of other populations that may be associated with CAR-T expansion or neurotoxicity. This work demonstrates how multidimensional correlative studies can enhance our understanding of CAR T-cell biology and uncover populations associated with clinical outcome in CAR T cell therapies. This work was supported by the Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy. Figure Disclosures Muffly: Pfizer: Consultancy; Adaptive: Research Funding; KITE: Consultancy. Miklos:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite-Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AlloGene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Precision Bioscience: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Miltenyi Biotech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Becton Dickinson: Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Juno: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mackall:Vor: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Roche: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Adaptimmune LLC: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Glaxo-Smith-Kline: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Allogene: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Apricity Health: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Unum Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Obsidian: Research Funding; Lyell: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Other: Founder, Research Funding; Nektar: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; PACT: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Bryologyx: Other: Scientific Advisory Board.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document