Targeting Tyrosine Kinase Receptors

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. SCI-25-SCI-25
Author(s):  
Michael Deininger

Abstract Protein tyrosine kinases (PTKs) regulate cell growth and other key functions. Constitutive PTK activation by somatic mutations, overexpression, or abnormal upstream signaling is characteristic of many cancers, including hematologic malignancies, providing a rationale for therapeutically targeting PTKs with small molecules. Imatinib, an ATP-competitive inhibitor of BCR-ABL1, the PTK causal to chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), established a paradigm for tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) as cancer therapeutics. Although a relatively weak inhibitor, imatinib is effective in most patients with chronic phase CML (CML-CP), while responses are transient in blastic phase (CML-BP). Point mutations in the BCR-ABL1 kinase domain have emerged as a major mechanism of drug resistance. The more potent second-generation TKIs – dasatinib, nilotinib, and bosutinib – induce deeper and faster responses and are active against many imatinib-resistant mutants, with the exception of T315I in the gatekeeper position of the catalytic site. This problem was addressed with ponatinib, a third-generation TKI covering all single BCR-ABL1 mutants, including T315I. Ponatinib has excellent clinical activity in CML-CP patients who failed other TKIs, while responses in CML-BP are short-lived. Some patients fail ponatinib due to BCR-ABL1 compound mutations, suggesting even third-generation TKIs cannot completely prevent mutational escape by the disease-initiating kinase. Another unsolved problem is that TKIs fail to efficiently target CML stem cells, leading to recurrence of active leukemia upon discontinuation. Despite these shortcomings, TKIs have completely changed the face of CML. Unfortunately, repeating this success in other hematologic malignancies has been challenging, likely reflecting differences in disease biology as much as suboptimal design of early compounds. CML-CP represents one extreme of the spectrum, where a single genetic lesion is sufficient to produce the phenotype and the hierarchy of hematopoietic differentiation is maintained. The situation is different in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with activating FLT3 mutations. Not only these AML cases have mutations in other genes, they typically acquire FLT3 mutations late during disease evolution, implying that the disease-initiating clone will be impervious to FLT3 inhibition. Progress has been made through successive development of more potent TKIs with improved pharmacology, leading to quizartinib. It is clear, however, that FLT3 inhibitors cannot be used as single agents if there is a curative intent and the same may be true for JAK2 inhibitors in myelofibrosis. The first approved JAK2 inhibitor, ruxolitinib, dramatically improves symptoms, but has yet to demonstrate a significant impact on the malignant clone and is certainly not curative. It remains to be seen whether this reflects the fact that JAK2 activation is not the disease–initiating event, lack of inhibitor specificity towards the mutant JAK2 kinase, or other undesirable off-target effects that may be overcome with improved drugs. A completely new chapter was opened with ibrutinib, an irreversible inhibitor of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK), for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). BTK is essential for signal transduction from the B-cell receptor (BCR). No activating mutations in BTK have been identified in lymphoma or CLL, but constitutive BCR signaling is critical to CLL cell survival in the microenvironment. Early studies show excellent clinical activity in patients with advanced CLL, although many responses are incomplete; much like the imatinib responses in late CML-CP. Ibrutinib may have a similarly profound effect upon CLL as imatinib on CML, but perhaps also similar limitations, such as the inability to eradicate residual leukemia; this of course needs to be tested in frontline studies. TKIs have had a significant albeit uneven impact upon treatment paradigms in hematologic malignancies. Future progress will involve optimizing compounds in terms of potency, selectivity, and pharmacokinetics. Allosteric inhibitors may add to the armamentarium. From the target perspective, it is likely that most activated kinase alleles have been discovered and the focus should shift to identification of disease-critical unmutated kinases. Lastly, identifying synthetically lethal inhibitor combinations will be critical to fully exploit the potential of TKI therapy. Disclosures: Deininger: BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; ARIAD: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; NOVARTIS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; CELGENE: Research Funding; GENZYME: Research Funding; INCYTE: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; GILEAD: Research Funding.

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 768-768 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph G. Jurcic ◽  
Todd L. Rosenblat ◽  
Michael R. McDevitt ◽  
Neeta Pandit-Taskar ◽  
Jorge A. Carrasquillo ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 768 Background: Lintuzumab, a humanized anti-CD33 antibody, targets myeloid leukemia cells and has modest activity against AML. To increase the antibody's potency yet avoid nonspecific cytotoxicity seen with β-emitting isotopes, the α-emitter bismuth-213 (213Bi) was conjugated to lintuzumab. Substantial clinical activity was seen in phase I and II trials, but the use of 213Bi is limited by its 46-min half-life. The isotope generator, 225Ac (t½=10 days), yields 4 α-emitting isotopes and can be conjugated to a variety of antibodies using DOTA-SCN. 225Ac-labeled immunoconjugates kill in vitro at radioactivity doses at least 1,000 times lower than 213Bi analogs and prolong survival in mouse xenograft models of several cancers (McDevitt et al. Science 2001). Methods: We are conducting a first-in-man phase I dose escalation trial to determine the safety, pharmacology, and biological activity of 225Ac-lintuzumab in AML. Results: Fifteen patients (median age, 62 yrs; range, 45–80 yrs) with relapsed (n=10) or refractory (n=5) AML were treated to date. Patients received a single infusion of 225Ac-lintuzumab at doses of 0.5 (n=3), 1 (n=4), 2 (n=3), 3 (n=3), or 4 (n=2) μCi/kg (total administered activity, 23–402 μCi). No acute toxicities were seen. Myelosuppression was the most common toxicity; the median time to resolution of grade 4 leukopenia was 26 days (range, 0–71 days). DLT was seen in 3 patients, including myelosuppression lasting >35 days in 1 patient receiving 4 μCi/kg and death due to sepsis in 2 patients treated at the 3 and 4 μCi/kg dose levels. Febrile neutropenia was seen in 4 patients, and 4 patients had grade 3/4 bacteremia. Extramedullary toxicities were limited to transient grade 2/3 liver function abnormalities in 4 patients. With a median follow-up of 2 mos (range, 1–24 mos), no evidence of radiation nephritis was seen. We analyzed plasma pharmacokinetics by gamma counting at energy windows for 2 daughters of 225Ac, francium-221 (221Fr) and 213Bi. Two-phase elimination kinetics were seen with mean plasma t½-α and t½-β of 1.9 and 35 hours, respectively. These results are similar to other lintuzumab constructs labeled with long-lived radioisotopes. Peripheral blood blasts were eliminated in 9 of 14 evaluable patients (64%), but only at doses of ≥1 μCi/kg. Bone marrow blast reductions were seen in 8 of 12 evaluable patients (67%) at 4 weeks, including 6 patients (50%) who had a blast reduction of ≥50%. Three patients treated with 1, 3, and 4 μCi/kg achieved bone marrow blast reductions to ≤5%. Conclusions: This is the first study to show that therapy with a targeted α-particle generator is feasible in humans. 225Ac-lintuzumab has antileukemic activity across all dose levels. Accrual to this trial continues to define the MTD. Disclosures: Jurcic: Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. McDevitt:Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding. Cicic:Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Scheinberg:Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 3876-3876
Author(s):  
Russell T Burke ◽  
Astrid Clarke ◽  
Sarah A Meadows ◽  
Marc M Loriaux ◽  
Jennifer B Dunlap ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3876 Background: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most common leukemia in the Western World and remains incurable with standard therapies. Despite significant advances, novel treatments are essential to improve outcomes. A number of therapeutic agents have recently been developed including some that have shown significant activity and tolerability in clinical trials. Among these drugs, are small molecule kinase inhibitors that inhibit B-cell receptor (BCR)-mediated signaling pathways and disrupt essential CLL cell-microenvironment interactions. Specifically, when primary CLL cells are treated with GS-1101, a PI3 kinase delta-specific isoform (PI3Kδ) inhibitor, Bruton's tyrosine kinase (Btk) inhibitors or spleen tyrosine kinase (Syk) inhibitors, inhibition of signaling pathways downstream of the BCR, cell killing, and disruption of chemokine-mediated CLL cell migration are observed. Although significant clinical activity has been observed in patients treated with single agents that target these critical pathways, very little is known about the effects of inhibiting multiple nodes in the BCR pathway. Simultaneous inhibition of multiple pathways downstream of the BCR has the potential to result in a synergistic response that may overcome the resistance observed with single compound use. These considerations prompted us to assess the effects of PI3Kd and Syk inhibition and to determine if dual inhibition might enhance antitumor effects in CLL. Methods and Results: CLL patient samples were assessed for growth inhibition, chemokine release, and pathway activation status using a tetrazolium-based MTS assay, ELISA, and flow cytometry, respectively. PBMCs were isolated from primary patient samples using a Ficoll-Paque gradient. GS-1101, a PI3Kδ inhibitor, and GS-9973, a novel Syk inhibitor, were plated either alone in concentrations known to span their IC50 (.6nM to 10uM), or in combination using equimolar concentrations of each drug (.6nM to 10uM) in 96-well plates. 5×105 primary cells were cultured in triplicate in HS-5 stromal cell conditioned media and growth inhibition was determined after 72 hours. To explore potential additive, synergistic, or antagonistic interactions between GS-1101 and GS-9973, dose response and interaction indices were calculated using R (Lee et al. 2007). Given the importance of microenvironmental signals in the ability of malignant cells to survive, proliferate, and resist standard therapies, we investigated the effect of combining PI3Kd and Syk inhibitors for use on CLL cells in the presence of stroma-conditioned media. Immunoblotting and flow cytometry were used to measure the inhibitory effects of each drug alone or in combination on downstream targets known to be associated with BCR activation, including AKT, ERK, and S6 in Ramos cells, a Burkitt's lymphoma cell line, and in primary CLL cells. Of the 14 primary CLL samples treated with the single agent GS-9973, the median cell viability IC50 for all samples was 3.7 μM and an IC50 of ≤ 2μM was obtained in 7 samples (50%). Interaction indices were calculated from combination studies using GS-1101 and GS-9973 in 7 samples. At least one significantly synergistic concentration of the combination of GS-1101 and GS-9973 was found in five of the seven samples. The two remaining CLL samples showed additive responses when treated with the combination. Patient samples cultured in the presence of conditioned media resulted in increased CCL2, CCL3, and CCL4 levels. Production of these chemokines by CLL cells was reduced by both GS-1101 and GS-9973, alone and in combination. Furthermore, treatment with individual inhibitors decreased S6 and ERK, phosphorylation, an effect further enhanced by the combination of PI3Kd and Syk inhibition. Conclusion: Our findings indicate that both PI3Kd and Syk inhibition reduces CLL survival. Dual targeting can also induce synergistic growth inhibition and further disrupt chemokine signaling. Given the complexity of BCR signaling pathways, simultaneous targeting of multiple kinases has the potential to significantly increase clinical activity. Since inhibition of BCR mediated kinases has demonstrated good patient tolerability, combination therapy targeting both PI3Kd and Syk may provide a novel treatment approach, especially in patients with poor risk disease that may not respond optimally to single agents. Disclosures: Clarke: Gilead Sciences Inc: Employment. Meadows:Gilead sciences: Employment. Loriaux:Gilead Sciences Inc: Research Funding. Maciejewski:Gilead Sciences Inc: Employment. Di Paolo:Gilead Sciences Inc: Employment. Lannutti:Gilead Sciences Inc: Employment. Druker:Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cylene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Spurgeon:Gilead: Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 30-31
Author(s):  
Amer M. Zeidan ◽  
Adrienne M. Gilligan ◽  
Santosh Gautam ◽  
David L. Grinblatt ◽  
Dina Elsouda ◽  
...  

Introduction: The past decade in AML research has led to increased emphasis on disease-related mutations and associated targeted therapies. FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) mutations (FLT3+) are found in about 30% of AML patients and confer a poorer prognosis. Also, the availability of targeted therapies increases the value of testing for FLT3+ AML. A paucity of data exists regarding the real-world FLT3 testing rates in AML patients in both the newly diagnosed and R/R settings. As the treatment landscape for patients with R/R FLT3+ AML expands, it is important to understand how utilization of these therapies and trends in FLT3 testing impact patient outcomes in real-world settings. These updated results examined FLT3 testing trends, treatment patterns, and overall survival (OS) in patients with R/R FLT3+ AML. Patients were grouped based on the FDA approval of the second-generation FLT3 inhibitor gilteritinib (pre-gilteritinib approval vs. post-gilteritinib approval). Methods: This ongoing (01/01/2015-4/17/2020) retrospective study uses electronic medical record data of US patients from a network of 400+ oncology practices maintained in the Definitive Oncology Dataset, including practices affiliated with CancerLinQ. Eligible adult (≥18 years) patients who had a confirmed diagnosis of AML, FLT3+ status, and had ≥1 R/R event between 01/01/2015 and 02/20/2020 were included. FLT3 testing trends included testing performed at initial diagnosis, re-testing performed in the R/R setting, and changes in FLT3 mutation status. Treatment patterns included all systemic anticancer therapies received (including supportive care) for R/R FLT3+ AML. OS was measured from the first R/R event; patients without evidence of death were censored at the last observed visit. Kaplan-Meier analysis was applied to evaluate differences in OS by subsequent hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) status. Results: Data from 175 patients (50.9% male, n=89) with R/R FLT3+ AML were evaluated (n=124 pre-gilteritinib; n=51 post-gilteritinib). Most patients were White (72.0%; n=126) with a median age of 62 years (range: 20-86) at first R/R event. Median length of follow-up was limited for the post-gilteritinib cohort (9.2 months vs. 15.0 months for pre-gilteritinib, P<0.001). Patients tested for FLT3 mutations at initial AML diagnosis increased from 84.7% (n=105/124) in the pre-gilteritinib cohort to 98.0% (n=50/51) in the post-gilteritinib cohort, and the rates of re-testing increased from 29.5% (n=31/105) to 46.0% (n=23/50) across the two cohorts (Figure 1). After the first R/R event, 18.9% (n=33/175) reported changes in their FLT3 mutation status. Seventy-four different treatment combinations were utilized at the first R/R event. Use of FLT3 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), either alone or in combination with chemotherapy, increased from 30.6% (n=38/124) in the pre-gilteritinib cohort to 49.0% (n=25/51) in the post-gilteritinib cohort (Table 1). In the pre-gilteritinib cohort midostaurin (52.6%, n=20/38) and sorafenib (32.4%, n=13/38) were the most commonly prescribed FLT3 TKIs. In the post-gilteritinib cohort, the most common FLT3 TKI was gilteritinib (52.0%, n=13/25). Median OS (95% CI) across all patients at the first R/R event was 13.4 (9.0-17.6) months in the pre-gilteritinib cohort and 12.9 (7.0, NA) months in the post-gilteritinib cohort. Median OS was significantly shorter among patients that did not receive HSCT among all patients and the subset of treated patients (P<0.05 for both values). Median OS for patients with no HSCT was 3.9 months longer in the post-gilteritinib cohort versus the pre-gilteritinib cohort (Table 2). Conclusion: An increase in FLT3 TKI use (both monotherapy and in combination) and a decrease in high-intensity chemotherapy was observed across the two cohorts. In the 18-month post approval period, FLT3 TKI use increased 60% with gilteritinib accounting for more than half of FLT3 TKIs used in the R/R setting. FLT3 re-testing increased by 55% in the R/R setting between the two cohorts; however, re-testing is suboptimal and there is a need to re-test as patients progress. Among pre- and post-treated patients that did not receive HSCT, there was an improvement in OS by almost 4 months, possibly due to increased use of targeted FLT3 TKIs. With recent approval of these targeted therapies, it will be important to continue to monitor FLT3 testing, treatment patterns, and clinical outcomes. Disclosures Zeidan: Celgene / BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria; Ionis: Consultancy, Honoraria; BeyondSpring: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Otsuka: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; CCITLA: Other; Astex: Research Funding; Cardinal Health: Consultancy, Honoraria; Trovagene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Leukemia and Lymphoma Society: Other; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Taiho: Consultancy, Honoraria; Aprea: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Epizyme: Consultancy, Honoraria; MedImmune/Astrazeneca: Research Funding; Acceleron: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Cardiff Oncology: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other. Gilligan:ConcertAI: Current Employment. Grinblatt:Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alexion: Speakers Bureau. Elsouda:Astellas: Current Employment. Sullivan:Astellas Pharma: Current Employment. Pandya:Astellas Pharma, Inc.: Current Employment.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3826-3826 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A Sallman ◽  
Jason B. Brayer ◽  
Xavier Poire ◽  
Violaine Havelange ◽  
Ahmad Awada ◽  
...  

CYAD-01 cells are engineered T-cells expressing a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) based on the natural full-length human natural killer group 2D (NKG2D) receptor fused to the intracellular domain of CD3ζ. NKG2D receptor binds to 8 ligands (MICA/B, ULBP1-6) expressed by a large variety of malignancies, including acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). The hematological arm of the Phase I THINK study (NCT03018405) evaluates the safety and clinical activity of multiple CYAD-01 infusions (inf) without any prior preconditioning chemotherapy in r/r AML, MDS and multiple myeloma (MM) patients (pts). Three dose levels (DL) were evaluated: 3x108, 1x109 and 3x109 T-cells/inf. The first cycle of the treatment consists of 3 CYAD-01 infusions every 2 weeks and a potential 2nd cycle of 3 CYAD-01 infusions every 2 weeks if the patient is not in progressive disease (PD) at the end of the 1st cycle. Additional cohorts evaluate DL2 and DL3 following a denser treatment schedule for the 1st cycle of treatment, with the first 3 CYAD-01 infusions administered every week. As of end of July 2019, 16 pts were enrolled in the dose-escalation segment of the hematological cohort with the initial schedule (CYAD-01 infusions every 2 weeks) for 1st cycle, now completed. In total (uncleaned database), 7 pts experienced grade (G) 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (AEs). Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurred in 7 pts with only 2 pts at DL2 who experienced G3 CRS and 1 pt who experienced G4 CRS at DL3 reported as a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). All CRS AEs resolved with early tocilizumab treatment. No treatment-related neurotoxicity AEs have been observed. Out of the 10 AML/MDS pts who received at least 3 CYAD-01 infusions and were assessed for clinical activity, 4 showed overall response (OR) at Day 29 of which 1 complete remission (CR) with partial hematologic recovery (CRh) for > 21 months in a r/r AML pt at DL1, 2 CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) for 1 month in AML pt at DL1 and DL3, and 1 marrow CR (mCR) for 1 month in an MDS pt at DL3. 2 AML pts at DL2 had stable disease (SD) for ≥ 3 months with bone marrow (BM) blast percentage decrease. Two other AML pts in DL3 achieved SD for at least 2 months. 2 AML pts did not have evidence of clinical response. The 2 evaluable MM pts did not show evidence of clinical response. As of end of July 2019, 8 pts were enrolled in cohorts with the dense schedule (4 in DL2 and 4 in DL3). Recruitment at 3x109 T-cells/inf. is still ongoing and is expected to be completed by the time of presentation. At DL2 (uncleaned database), only 1 pt out of 4 experienced a study treatment-related G4 AE (infusion related reaction). The 3 other pts experienced G1 or 2 study treatment-related AEs, with 3 pts who experienced G1/2 CRS. One AML pt reached a stable disease at the Day 32 tumor evaluation. At DL3, 2 out of 4 currently enrolled pts experienced study treatment related G3 AE (CRS) after their first CYAD-01 infusion. One of these G3 CRS was reported as a dose-limiting toxicity. Altogether, results obtained to date demonstrate an encouraging safety and tolerability profile of CYAD-01 without preconditioning chemotherapy in pts with r/r hematological malignancies. Encouraging anti-leukemic activity was observed in 6 out of 13 (46%) evaluable r/r AML/MDS pts in the THINK study, presenting relevant decrease in BM blasts. Four objective responses (1 CRh, 2 CRi, 1 mCR) were observed with the initial schedule. At DL2, the denser schedule did not modify the safety profile while increasing the area under the curve of CYAD-01 peripheral blood levels, which could suggest a possible impact on clinical activity at DL3, results expected by the time of presentation. Disclosures Sallman: Celyad: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Brayer:Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Awada:Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Lilly: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; EISAI: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Genomic Health: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Ispen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Leo Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Wang:Abbvie: Other: Advisory role; Kite: Other: Advisory role; Jazz: Other: Advisory role; Astellas: Other: Advisory role, Speakers Bureau; celyad: Other: Advisory role; Pfizer: Other: Advisory role, Speakers Bureau; Stemline: Other: Advisory role, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi: Other: Advisory role; Amgen: Other: Advisory role; Agios: Other: Advisory role. Lonez:Celyad: Employment. Lequertier:Celyad: Employment. Alcantar-Orozco:Celyad: Employment. Braun:Celyad: Employment. Flament:Celyad: Employment.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 34-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ami Patel ◽  
Anthony D. Pomicter ◽  
Anna M. Eiring ◽  
Than Hein ◽  
William L. Heaton ◽  
...  

Abstract Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an aggressive hematopoietic neoplasm that carries the worst prognosis among the hematologic malignancies. Up to 30% of AML patients exhibit activating mutations in FLT3 tyrosine kinase. FLT3 internal tandem duplications (ITDs) comprise ~70% of these mutations and are associated with a poor prognosis. Most patients treated with a single-agent FLT3 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) relapse within months due to secondary mutations in the FLT3 tyrosine kinase domain (TKD). Results from trials of FLT3 TKIs in AML reveal that leukemic blasts are more easily cleared from peripheral blood than from bone marrow (BM), suggesting that the BM microenvironment promotes survival of AML cells, including leukemia initiating cells, despite inhibition of FLT3. In this conceptual framework, extrinsic factors allow AML cells to survive TKI exposure until AML cell-intrinsic resistance is conferred by FLT3 TKD mutations, leading to clinical relapse. Here, we investigated the role of the BM microenvironment in protection of FLT3+AML cells from treatment with AC220 (quizartinib), a clinically available FLT3 TKI. To investigate the potential of the BM microenvironment to mediate TKI resistance in AML, we cultured FLT3-ITD+ AML cell lines, including MOLM-13, MOLM-14 and MV411, and the CML cell line, K562 (control; FLT3 wild-type), with graded concentrations of AC220 under the following conditions: (i) in regular medium (RM), (ii) in direct contact (DC) with human HS-5 BM stromal cells, or (iii) in HS-5 conditioned medium (CM). Cell proliferation and apoptosis assays revealed that, in RM,AC220 reduced proliferation and increased apoptosis of MOLM-13, MOLM-14 and MV411 cells, but had no effect on K562 cells. DC greatly reduced the effects of AC220 in all three FLT3-ITD+ AML cell lines, with comparable results observed between DC and CM. To confirm these data using primary cells, CD34+ blasts from a patient with newly diagnosed FLT3-ITD+ AML were similarly cultured in RM versus CM ± AC220. Consistent with results in cell lines, CM rescued primary AML cells from AC220-mediated cell death. These data indicate that soluble factors from the BM environment protect FLT3-ITD+ cells from the effects of FLT3 inhibition. Our lab and others have demonstrated that HS-5 DC and CM activate STAT3 in chronic myeloid leukemia, which mediates resistance to BCR-ABL1 TKIs (Bewry et al. Mol Cancer Ther 2008, Traer et al. Leukemia 2012, Eiring et al. Leukemia 2015). To interrogate the role of STAT3 in BM-mediated protection of AML cells from FLT3 inhibition, all cell lines were assessed for pSTAT3Y705 and total STAT3 by immunoblot analysis under each culture condition. In FLT3-ITD+ AML cells grown in RM, pSTAT3Y705 was undetectable, irrespective of AC220 dose. In contrast, pSTAT5Y694 was readily detected at steady state and suppressed by AC220. AML cells cultured in HS-5 DC or in HS-5 CM exhibited strong upregulation of pSTAT3Y705 that was unaffected by AC220, suggesting that soluble factor(s) promote STAT3 activation in AML. pSTAT5Y694, on the other hand, was slightly elevated by HS-5 DC or CM, but remained under control of FLT3 kinase activity. In order to mechanistically implicate STAT3 activation in stroma-based protection, we used a retroviral shRNA construct to knockdown STAT3 (shSTAT3) compared to an empty vector control (LMP) in MOLM-14 cells. STAT3 knockdown (~70%) was confirmed by qRT-PCR and immunoblot analyses. Cells containing shSTAT3 and LMP were cultured for 72 hours in RM or CM ± AC220, followed by analysis using MTS assays. As expected, CM increased the IC50 of AC220 from 1.37 nM to 6.24 nM in LMP-expressing cells (n=3). In contrast, shSTAT3 reduced the IC50 of AC220 from 6.24 nM to 2.87 nM (n=3) in CM, with minimal effects in RM. Similarly, pharmacologic inhibition of STAT3 using the novel STAT3 inhibitor, BP-5-087 (Eiring et al. Leukemia 2015), reduced the IC50 of AC220 from 10.07 nM to 5.91 nM in CM. Analogous experiments in additional FLT3-ITD+cell lines and primary AML cells, using shSTAT3, dominant-negative STAT3 constructs and BP5-087 are ongoing. Our data suggest that STAT3 is a critical signaling node in FLT3-independent TKI resistance mediated by the BM microenvironment. Therapeutic strategies designed to combine FLT3 and STAT3 inhibition may inhibit the survival of leukemic cells in the BM niche, thereby preventing subsequent clinical relapse conferred by TKD mutations. Disclosures Deininger: Incyte: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; CTI BioPharma Corp.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3907-3907 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manish R. Patel ◽  
Guillermo Garcia-Manero ◽  
Ronald Paquette ◽  
Shira Dinner ◽  
William B. Donnellan ◽  
...  

Background: BET inhibitors have demonstrated therapeutic potential in hematologic malignancies; however low therapeutic margins have limited clinical development. FT-1101 (also known as CC-95775) is a BET bromodomain inhibitor of all 4 BET family members BRD4, BRD2, BRD3, and BRDT (Kd ≤20 nM) and shows additional activity towards several non-BET bromodomain proteins (including CECR2 and BRD9). In vitro, FT-1101 displayed potent anti-proliferative activity across a broad panel of human leukemia cell lines. In xenograft and syngeneic models, FT-1101 achieved superior tumor growth inhibition (including regressions) relative to JQ1, another BET inhibitor (Millan 2015). Methods: A Phase 1 study evaluated the safety, PK/PD, and clinical activity of FT-1101 in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML/MDS, or non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) (NCT02543879). Oral FT-1101 (10 mg - 600 mg) was dosed once a week (QW), every other week (QOW), or monthly (QM) during dose escalation. Safety was assessed via treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) for all pts; efficacy (response) was assessed in evaluable pts by investigators. Pharmacodynamic biomarkers (CCR1 and HEXIM1 mRNA expression) were assessed in whole blood. Results: Between 17-Nov-2015 and 05-Mar-2019, a total of 84 AML/MDS pts and 10 NHL pts received FT-1101 in dose escalation with a median of 2 (range 1-13) treatment cycles and median exposure of 43 (1-401) days for AML/MDS and 51.5 (1-183) days for NHL pts. Most AML/MDS pts (n=80) received FT-1101 monotherapy; a small cohort (n=4) received FT-1101 200 mg QOW in combination with azacitidine. FT-1101 appeared to demonstrate dose-proportional PK (10-600 mg/dose) with a median Tmax of 4 (1-24) hrs and a mean T1/2 of 52 (18-123) hrs. Pharmacodynamic responses correlated with FT-1101 concentrations; preliminary analysis indicated that PD biomarker modulation (↓ CCR1 and ↑ HEXIM1) was seen with FT-1101 doses as low as 80 mg, with more robust modulation observed at FT-1101 doses >180 mg. The most common (>20%) TEAEs (all grades) were diarrhea (32%), fatigue (30%), dyspnea (29%), nausea (27%), anemia (24%), and platelet count decreased (21%) among AML/MDS pts and diarrhea (60%), nausea or pleural effusion (40% each), and cough, decreased appetite or dyspnea (30% each) among NHL pts. The most common (>10%) severe (≥ grade 3) TEAEs were anemia (21%), decreased platelets (19%), pneumonia (16%), sepsis (13%), febrile neutropenia (12%), and disease progression (11%) among AML/MDS pts and pleural effusion or disease progression (20% each) among NHL pts. AEs led to treatment discontinuation in 22 AML/MDS pts (26%) and 2 NHL pts (20%). Twenty AML/MDS pts (24%) and 2 NHL pts (20%) died due to AEs, all assessed as unrelated to study treatment. Disease progression was the most common fatal TEAE in AML/MDS and NHL pts (10% and 20%, respectively). The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) on the QOW schedule was 400 mg FT-1101; MTDs were not determined for other schedules. Among evaluable AML/MDS pts who received >180 mg FT-1101 monotherapy (n=30), one pt (3%) on the 400 mg QOW schedule achieved complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) and 19 pts (63%) achieved stable disease, including 2 pts receiving >7 cycles of treatment. Among evaluable NHL patients who received >180 mg FT-1101 monotherapy (n=3), one pt (33%) achieved stable disease. Conclusions: FT-1101, as monotherapy, shows acceptable safety, PK, and modest clinical activity in R/R AML/MDS and NHL pts. Intermittent (QOW) dosing within a tolerable range elicits PD activity (CCR1 suppression and HEXIM1 upregulation) consistent with preclinical observations indicating antitumor activity, and provides a rationale for testing FT-1101 in combination with standard therapies in AML/MDS and NHL. Disclosures Patel: Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Exelixis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Garcia-Manero:Amphivena: Consultancy, Research Funding; Helsinn: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astex: Consultancy, Research Funding; Onconova: Research Funding; H3 Biomedicine: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. Dinner:Agios: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy. Grunwald:Forma Therapeutics: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Medtronic: Equity Ownership; Cardinal Health: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Genentech/Roche: Research Funding; Trovagene: Consultancy; Janssen: Research Funding. Ribadeneira:FORMA Therapeutics: Employment. Schroeder:FORMA Therapeutics: Employment. Brevard:FORMA Therapeutics: Employment. Wilson:FORMA Therapeutics: Employment. Sweeney:FORMA Therapeutics: Employment. Kelly:FORMA Therapeutics: Employment. Lancet:Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Other: fees for non-CME/CE services ; Agios, Biopath, Biosight, Boehringer Inglheim, Celator, Celgene, Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Karyopharm, Novartis: Consultancy.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1306-1306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Courtney DiNardo ◽  
Stéphane de Botton ◽  
Daniel A Pollyea ◽  
Eytan M Stein ◽  
Amir T. Fathi ◽  
...  

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Somatic mutations in the metabolic enzymes isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 (IDH1/2) confer gain-of-function activity in cancer cells, resulting in accumulation of the oncometabolite D-2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG). High levels of 2-HG result in epigenetic changes and impaired cellular differentiation. IDH mutations have been identified in a spectrum of solid tumors and hematologic malignancies, with mutations in DNMT3A and NPM1 co-occurring with IDH1 most frequently (Molenaar et al. Leukemia 2015). AG-120 is a first-in-class, oral, potent, reversible, selective inhibitor of the IDH1 mutant enzyme being evaluated in an ongoing, first-in-human, phase 1, open-label study (NCT02074839). We report data, including clinical activity and safety, based on patients from the completed dose escalation phase. Molecular profiling, including observations of co-occurring genomic alterations at baseline, and relationship with clinical activity is also presented. METHODS: Patients with advanced IDH1 mutation-positive hematologic malignancies, diagnosed by local evaluation, receive AG-120 as a single agent orally once daily (QD) or twice daily (BID) continuously, in 28-day cycles. Bone marrow is examined on Days 15, 29, 57, and every 56 days thereafter. Primary objectives are safety, determination of maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and selection of a dose schedule for expansion cohorts and future phase 2 studies. Secondary objectives include clinical activity assessed by investigators using modified 2003 International Working Group Criteria in AML (Cheson et al). Molecular profiling was performed with the FoundationOne Heme next-generation sequencing (NGS) test on bone marrow and/or peripheral blood from all patients at pre-defined time points throughout the study. RESULTS: As of July 1, 2015, 66 patients were treated in the dose escalation phase, of whom 25 remain on treatment. Therapy has been well tolerated and the MTD was not reached. Dosing in the first cohort was 100 mg BID. The long half-life of AG-120 supported QD dosing subsequently, and 1200 mg QD was the highest dose evaluated. Dose escalation is now closed. The majority of adverse events (AEs) were grade 1 and 2, the most common being diarrhea (23%), fatigue (22%), and pyrexia (22%); the most common Grade ≥3 AE was febrile neutropenia (11%). The majority of serious AEs were disease-related. Of the 66 patients, 61 are response evaluable (patients with a Day 28 or later response assessment or who discontinued earlier than Day 28 for any reason). In all response evaluable patients, an estimated 55% had treatment durations of at least 3 months. Objective responses have been observed in 22 subjects (11 complete remissions [CR], 1 CR with incomplete platelet recovery, 4 partial responses and 6 marrow CRs), with a CR rate of 18% and an overall response rate (ORR) of 36% (22/61). Responses are durable, with a median duration of response among responders of 5.6 months [1.9, NE], including responses ≥11 months. Molecular profiling data from screening bone marrow was available in 38 patients. Among these 38, the most common co-mutations associated with IDH1 mutation were DNMT3A (67%) and NPM1 (24%). Incidence of additional co-mutations was <22%, with FLT3 in 7 patients (21%). Additional samples for longitudinal NGS sequencing were further analyzed at specified time points throughout the study. Updates from the completed dose escalation phase and further molecular profiling analysis will be presented. Three dose expansion arms are currently enrolling at 500 mg QD in relapsed/refractory AML, untreated AML, or other IDH1 mutation-positive advanced hematologic malignancies (n=125, n=25, and n=25, respectively, as of July 1, 2015). In addition, safety and efficacy data from the ongoing study will be included as of an October 2015 data cut-off date. CONCLUSION: AG-120, a potent, selective, oral inhibitor of mutant IDH1, is well tolerated in patients with advanced hematologic malignancies, and induces objective durable responses, with an ORR of 36%, including complete remissions. Molecular profiling may provide insights into the mechanisms of response and resistance. The data support the efficacy of AG-120 and provide continued validation of mutant IDH1 as a therapeutic cancer target. Disclosures DiNardo: Novartis: Research Funding. de Botton:Agios pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Pollyea:Glycomimetics: Other: Member of data safety monitoring board; Pfizer: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Agios Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy. Stein:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Fathi:Agios Pharmaceuticals: Other: Advisory Board participation; Seattle Genetics: Other: Advisory Board participation, Research Funding; Merck: Other: Advisory Board participation. Flinn:Cephalon, Inc; Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd; Genentech, inc; Gilead: Research Funding. Altman:Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Spectrum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ariad: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Derti:Agios Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Goldwasser:Agios Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Prahl:Agios Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wu:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Yen:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Agresta:Agios Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Stone:Agios: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; AROG: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Celator: Consultancy; Roche/Genetech: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Sunesis: Consultancy, Other: DSMB for clinical trial; Abbvie: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2656-2656 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin M. Watts ◽  
Terrence J Bradley ◽  
Amber Thomassen ◽  
Andrew M. Brunner ◽  
Mark D. Minden ◽  
...  

Background Protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) is the primary enzyme responsible for symmetric arginine dimethylation of multiple proteins that impact cell proliferation. Its substrates include proteins involved in mRNA splicing, signal transduction, gene transcription, and DNA repair. PRMT5 overexpression occurs in many cancers and correlates with poor prognosis. GSK3326595 is a potent, specific, and reversible inhibitor of PRMT5 that inhibits proliferation and induces cell death in a broad range of solid and hematologic tumor cell lines. It also exhibits potent anti-tumor activity in vivo in animal models, including in preclinical models of myeloid malignancies. One mechanism of action of GSK3326595 is via inhibition of cellular mRNA splicing and upregulation of tumor suppressor function. Mutations in splicing factors are frequent in myeloid malignancies (including approximately 40% of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome [MDS], and over 60% of patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia [CMML]), and further inhibition of mRNA splicing via GSK3326595 may lead to a synthetic lethal phenotype specifically in splicing mutant disease. Study 208809 is the first trial of a PRMT5 inhibitor in participants with myeloid malignancies. Methods Study 208809 is a Phase I/II study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and clinical activity of GSK3326595 monotherapy in participants with relapsed and refractory MDS, CMML, and hypoproliferative acute myeloid leukemia (AML) that has evolved from an antecedent MDS. Part 1 will identify a tolerated dose and establish preliminary evidence of efficacy in this population. At the end of Part 1, if pre-specified criteria are met, then the study will be expanded with three additional Parts that will be opened in parallel. Part 2A is a Phase II randomized comparison of monotherapy GSK3326595 versus investigator's choice of best available care in participants with relapsed and refractory MDS, CMML, and hypoproliferative AML. Part 2B is a single-arm investigation of safety and efficacy of GSK3326595 plus 5-azacitidine in participants with newly diagnosed high-risk MDS. Part 2C is a single-arm investigation of the safety and efficacy of monotherapy GSK3326595 in participants with relapsed or refractory AML whose tumors harbor mutations in components of the pre-mRNA splicing machinery. All participants enrolled in this study have a diagnosis of MDS, CMML, or AML, with enrollment into each cohort as defined above. Participants are adults with adequate organ function as defined in the protocol. Prior allogeneic transplant is permitted. There are no required biomarkers for enrollment to Parts 1, 2A, and 2B, though central confirmation of pre-mRNA splicing factor mutations will be performed to stratify participants for overall analysis. Enrollment to Part 2C is limited to participants with splicing factor mutations. It is estimated that a maximum of 302 participants will be enrolled in the study, divided as follows: Approximately 41 participants in Part 1, approximately 192 participants in Part 2A, approximately 41 participants in Part 2B, and approximately 28 participants in Part 2C. In Part 1, the primary endpoint is clinical benefit rate, as defined as the percentage of participants achieving a complete remission, complete marrow remission, partial remission (PR), stable disease lasting at least 8 weeks, or hematologic improvement, as per standard criteria. In Part 2A, the primary endpoint is overall survival. In Part 2B and Part 2C, the primary endpoint is overall response rate (ORR), defined as the percentage of participants achieving a PR or better. Samples are collected to evaluate symmetric dimethylated arginine (SDMA), the enzymatic product of PRMT5. This has been demonstrated to be a pharmacodynamic marker of PRMT5 inhibition in plasma and tumor tissue. In addition, participants will be stratified based on the presence or absence of spliceosome mutations and analyzed separately to evaluate the effect of these mutations on clinical activity. As of 1 August 2019, recruitment is ongoing across six centers in the United States and Canada; ten participants have been enrolled, all into Part 1. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03614728 Study is funded by GlaxoSmithKline Disclosures Watts: Takeda: Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Bradley:AbbVie: Other: Advisory Board. Brunner:Novartis: Research Funding; Jazz Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Forty Seven Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Minden:Trillium Therapetuics: Other: licensing agreement. Papadantonakis:Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria. Abedin:Actinium Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Pfizer Inc: Research Funding; Helsinn Healthcare: Research Funding; Agios: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Baines:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Equity Ownership. Barbash:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Gorman:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kremer:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Equity Ownership. Borthakur:Cantargia AB: Research Funding; Eisai: Research Funding; Tetralogic Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Argenx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; FTC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BioTheryX: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Xbiotech USA: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Oncoceutics: Research Funding; Oncoceutics, Inc.: Research Funding; PTC Therapeutics: Consultancy; BioLine Rx: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Agensys: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Bayer Healthcare AG: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Eli Lilly and Co.: Research Funding; NKarta: Consultancy; Cyclacel: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Arvinas: Research Funding; Polaris: Research Funding; Strategia Therapeutics: Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2291-2291
Author(s):  
Hari S. Raman ◽  
Yael Flamand ◽  
Marlise R. Luskin ◽  
Daniel J. DeAngelo ◽  
Richard M. Stone ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted non-urgent and preventive medical care. During the early peak of the pandemic, an estimated 41% of US adults delayed or avoided medical care (Czeisler et al, CDC, 2020). While there were documented declines in the number of emergency department visits for myocardial infarction, stroke and hyperglycemia, similar data is not available related to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (Lange et al, CDC, 2020). A delay in the diagnosis of AML could lead to presentation when patients are less able to withstand chemotherapy or have a higher disease burden which could compromise overall survival (OS). In this retrospective analysis, we aim to elucidate if there was a difference in clinical, cytogenetic, or molecular presentations and if there was an effect on early mortality as determined by overall survival at 1 and 6 months. Methods We compared the clinical, cytogenetic, and baseline molecular genetics of consecutive adult patients diagnosed with de novo AML at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's (DFCI/BWH) Hospital from March 23, 2020, the date of the Massachusetts COVID State of Emergency, to August 23, 2020 to a historical cohort of similar patients between presenting between March 23, 2017 and August 23, 2020. Data was obtained from the Hematological Malignancy Data Repository and via review of the medical record. Patients were excluded from this cohort if they were diagnosed with acute promyelocytic leukemia, had known antecedent myeloid malignancy, or if they did not have DFCI/BWH 96-gene next-generation sequencing panel (RHP) performed at the time of diagnosis. Baseline clinical, laboratory, cytogenetic, and molecular characteristics and outcomes were compared between the pre-pandemic and pandemic cohorts using chi-squared, Fisher's exact, and Wilcoxon rank sum analyses (where appropriate) at a significance of p&lt;0.05. Results Thirty-eight AML patients presented during the COVID-19 pandemic (PAN) and 308 in the pre-pandemic (PREPAN) period. There was no statistically significant difference in the monthly rate of new patients presenting in PREPAN and PAN cohorts (8 vs. 6 new patients/month, p=0.73). The median age at presentation (64 PREPAN vs. 65 PAN, p=0.77), sex, and therapeutic approach (intensive, non-intensive, supportive care, other) were not statistically different between cohorts. Presenting white blood cell count, platelet count, and fibrinogen were not different between cohorts, while hematocrit was significantly lower in the PAN cohort (23.8% vs. 26.0%, p=0.001). There was a trend for a higher median blast percentage (28.5% vs. 13%, p=0.09) in the PAN cohort. There were no differences between the cohorts in the median number of cytogenetic abnormalities, nor in the incidence of complex karyotype, (25.3% vs. 23.7%) across PREPAN and PAN respectively. There were also no significant differences in the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) risk classification scores across the PREPAN and PAN time periods, with 57.8% vs. 52.6% of total patients presenting with adverse risk disease respectively. When specific mutations of TP53, NPM1, and FLT3 were evaluated, only FLT3 demonstrated a statistical difference with a higher proportion in the pandemic group (p=0.04). OS at 1-month (97.4% and 93.2%, p=0.15) and 6-months (71.1% and 75.0%, p-0.87) were not statistically different in the PREPAN and PAN cohorts, respectively. Conclusion These data represent a novel analysis of the presenting clinical, cytogenetic and molecular characteristics of de novo AML during the COVID-19 pandemic. In contrast to other diseases, we did not see fewer de novo AML presentations during the peak of the COVID pandemic. While the reasons are unknown and require validation in large cohorts, the symptoms of leukemia including symptomatic anemia (low hematocrit) and higher WBC and blast count possibly driven by FLT3 mutations may drive patients to seek emergent clinical evaluation despite COVID pandemic barriers. The lack of difference in cytogenetic or other prognostic entities may demonstrate a lack of symptom correlation causing patients to present for care. The higher incidence of FLT3 mutations and lower hematocrit could reflect more symptomatic presentation of AML during the COVID pandemic. Since these differences may be a surrogate for a higher disease burden, it will be important to compare outcomes at longer time points. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures DeAngelo: Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Forty-Seven: Consultancy; Autolus: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Glycomimetrics: Research Funding; Blueprint: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Servier: Consultancy. Stone: Bristol Meyers Squibb: Consultancy; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BerGen Bio: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Boston Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Innate: Consultancy; Foghorn Therapeutics: Consultancy; Gemoab: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Glaxo Smith Kline: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Elevate Bio: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; OncoNova: Consultancy; Syntrix/ACI: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Syndax: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Aprea: Consultancy; Arog: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy; Macrogenics: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Actinium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Consultancy; Syros: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy. Garcia: AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Prelude: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Winer: Abbvie: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 446-446
Author(s):  
Christian Hurtz ◽  
Katerina Hatzi ◽  
Leandro Cerchietti ◽  
Eugene Park ◽  
Yong-Mi Kim ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 446 Background: Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is induced by the oncogenic BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase and can be effectively treated for many years with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). However, unless CML patients take TKI-treatment life-long, leukemia will eventually recur, which is attributed to the failure of TKI-treatment to eradicate leukemia-initiating cells (LIC; Corbin et al., J Clin Invest 2011). Persistence of LIC in CML can result in acquisition of secondary events eventually leading to TKI-resistant blast crisis, which is fatal within months. Recent work demonstrated that FoxO factors are critical for maintenance of CML-initiating cells (Naka et al., Nature 2010), however the mechanism of FoxO-dependent leukemia-initiation remained elusive. Results: Here we identified the BCL6 protooncogene as a critical effector downstream of FoxO in self-renewal signaling of CML-initiating cells. ChIP-seq analysis demonstrated that BCL6 directly binds to and represses Arf and p53 promoters in human CML cells. Genetic deletion of the BCL6 gene in a mouse model of CML results in progressive depletion of Lin- Sca-1+ c-Kit+ LIC. BCL6-deficient LIC exhibit excessively high expression levels of Arf and p53 and propensity to cellular senescence and apoptosis. As a consequence, BCL-deficient CML cells lack the ability to form colonies and to initiate leukemia in transplant recipient animals. To investigate whether these effects are indeed owing to the role of BCL6 as repressor of Arf/p53, we induced activation of a dominant-negative BCL6-mutant in p53+/+ and p53−/− CML cells. While dominant-negative BCL6 compromised colony formation and self-renewal in p53+/+ CML cells, BCL6 inhibition only had minor effect on p53−/− CML cells. We conclude that BCL6 enables survival of LIC in CML mainly through transcriptional repression of p53. To test potential clinical relevance of these findings, we used a recently developed retro-inverso BCL6 peptide inhibitor (RI-BPI, Cerchietti et al., 2009), which inhibits BCL6 function as transcriptional repressor. RI-BPI is currently under clinical trial for the treatment of BCL6-dependent diffuse large B cell lymphoma (Dr. Ari Melnick, LLS TAP Program). Importantly, peptide inhibition of BCL6 in human CML cells compromises colony formation and leukemia-initiation in transplant recipients and selectively eradicates CD34+ CD38− LIC in patient-derived CML samples. Conclusions: These findings identify pharmacological inhibition of BCL6 as a novel strategy to eradicate LIC in CML. Clinical validation of this concept could limit the duration of TKI-treatment in CML patients, which is currently life-long, and substantially decrease the risk of blast crisis transformation. Based on these findings, we propose a dual targeting strategy, in which (1) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (e.g. Imatinib) to target the transient amplifying pool of CML cells are coupled with (2) BCL6 inhibition that will target quiescent LIC. Disclosures: Hochhaus: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ariad: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Shah:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding. Druker:Novartis: ; Bristol-Myers Squibb: ; ARIAD Pharmaceuticals: ; OHSU patent #843: Mutated ABL Kinase Domains: Patents & Royalties; MolecularMD: Equity Ownership.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document