Bendamustine, Ofatumumab and High-Dose Methylprednisolone (BOMP) in Relapsed/Refractory CLL: Results of a Planned Interim Analysis of the French CLL Intergroup ICLL01 Phase II Trial

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 3341-3341 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie de Guibert ◽  
Marie-Sarah Dilhuydy ◽  
Loic Ysebaert ◽  
Laurence Sanhès ◽  
Sylvain Choquet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Tp53 Mutation ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Color Flow ◽  
High Dose Methylprednisolone

Abstract Introduction: For relapsed or refractory (R/R) CLL patients (pts), combination of bendamustine and rituximab appears safe and effective (Fischer 2011). Ofatumumab monotherapy gives 58% ORR in heavily pre-treated (median 4 prior lines) R/R CLL pts (Wierda JCO 2010). High doses (HD) steroids are also active in poor prognosis pts with bulky nodal involvement or p53 impairment (Castro 2008, Xu 2010). We report a planned interim analysis of the ICLL01-BOMP phase II trial evaluating the association of Bendamustine, Ofatumumab and high-dose MethylPrednisolone for fit R/R CLL pts after 1-3 previous lines (NCT01612988). Patients and Methods: Primary endpoint was CR rate after 6 cycles (cy) of the BOMP regimen [i.e. bendamustine (70 mg/m2 d1, d2), ofatumumab (1000 mg d1;15 on cy#1-2 and d1 on cy#3-6) and HD methylprednisolone (1 g/m2 d1-3)]. The c#1 was preceded by an ofatumumab (300 mg) prephase. Response evaluation (IWCLL 2008) was done 3 months (m) after the last cy along with blood and bone marrow 10-color flow MRD analysis. Results: Among the 55 pts of this analysis, median age was 64 years (44-76). CIRS-G comorbidity score was 2-6 in 61% and pts had received 2-3 lines in 37% of the cases. Prior FCR-like regimens (50 (91%) patients) had been followed by relapse within 2y in 22/55 and 5/55 pts were fludarabine-refractory (FR). IGVH was unmutated (UM) in (47/52) 90.4%. Karyotypes were complex in 18/46 (39%) cases. Distribution according to FISH hierarchical model was: del(17p) in 15 (27%), del(11q) in 14 (26%), trisomy 12 in 4 (7%), del(13q) in 17 (31%) and normal in 5 (9%). Mutations on the TP53, SF3B1 and NOTCH1 genes occurred in 17 (31%), 14 (26%) and 5 (9%) pts, respectively. According to published risk stratification (Zenz, 2012), 34/55 pts (62%) belonged to the “highest-risk” group with either TP53 disruption (deletion and/or mutation) (n=19) and/or early relapse within 2 years post-FCR (n=22). The remaining patients belonged to either the “high-risk” group (UM-IGVH and/or Highb2mic and/or del11q) accounting for 17 pts (31%) or to the “low-risk” group (or non evaluable) accounting for 4 (7%) pts. Overall, 292 BOMP cy (mean 5.3 cy/pts) were delivered. Safety analysis recorded 158 grade 3-4 adverse events (G3-4/AE) with according to cy: neutropenia: 20.8%, thrombocytopenia: 11.3%, anemia: 2.4%, infection: 5,8%, hyperglycemia: 7,5%, liver enzyme elevation: 1,4%, cutaneous reaction: 1,4%, ofatumumab infusion related reaction: 0,3% and other AE: 3,4%. Overall 43 out of 55 pts (78.2%) had at least one G3-4/AE. Twenty-eight severe adverse events were reported in 20 pts. Treatment interruption before planned 6 cy occurred for pts' decision (n=3), excessive toxicity (n=5) or early progressive disease (PD) (n = 4). Response in the ITT population was 76.4% ORR with 20% CR (n=11), 56.4% PR (n=31 including 5 nPR and 1 CRi), 9.1% stable disease (n=5), 10.9% PD (n=6) and 3.6% (n=3) non evaluable. Blood MRD obtained in 45 pts was negative (<10-4) in 13 (28.8%) cases. Following evaluation, 5 responding pts (9%) had RIC allogeneic (RIC-Allo) transplantation with a persistent remission. With median follow-up of 16.2 (5.1-23.6) months (m) we observed 9 deaths, related to PD (n=5), EBV-induced lymphoproliferation (n=1), PML encephalitis (n=1), sepsis/pancytopenia (n=1) or unknown origin (n=1). We recorded 22 relapses (including 4 Richter Syndromes) resulting in treatment in 17 cases, with a BTK inhibitor in 8 cases. The median OS has not been reached (estimation 84% at 18 m) (Fig 1B). The median PFS was 18.4 m (95%CI, 14.6-22.2) and the median time to next treatment 17.6 m (95%CI, 12.9-22.4). With 5 cases censored at time of RIC-Allo, the PFS (censored analysis) was 17.5 m (95%CI, 13.2-21.8). (Fig 1A) After univariate analysis, ORR was lower in the “highest-risk” (64,6%, p=0.01), del(17p) (40%, p=0.003), TP53 mutation (47.1%, p=0.01) and complex karyotype (61.2%, p=0.024) groups. PFS was shorter in the “highest-risk” (14 m, p=0.046), FR (4.96 m, p<0.001), del(17p) (9.5 m, p=0.017) and TP53 mutation (9.5 m, p=0.007) groups. Conclusion: Relapse treatment of CLL is a challenge especially after prior FCR-like treatments, accounting for >90% of this trial population. These results in terms of response and survival appear noteworthy considering that >60% are “highest-risk” pts. This study provides important information for forthcoming comparison with next emerging CLL therapies. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures de Guibert: Roche: Honoraria. Feugier:Roche: Honoraria. Schuh:Roche, Gilead, GSK, NAPP, Celgene: Honoraria. Leblond:Roche: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Tournilhac:mundipharma: Honoraria, Other, Research Funding; GSK: Honoraria, Other, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Other, Research Funding.

A Phase II Study of Ofatumumab-High Dose Methylprednisolone Followed By Ofatumumab-Alemtuzumab in 17p Deleted or TP53 Mutated CLL

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4159-4159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew S. Davids ◽  
Haesook T. Kim ◽  
Stacey M. Fernandes ◽  
Jeffrey Hellman ◽  
Karen Francoeur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Tp53 Mutation ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Infectious Complications ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Color Flow ◽  
Part C ◽  
High Dose Methylprednisolone ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract BACKGROUND: Even in the age of kinase inhibitors, the prognosis for patients (pts) with CLL with del(17p) or TP53 mutations remains poor, with the median PFS only 28 mo. for pts with relapsed/refractory del(17p) CLL treated with ibrutinib. High dose methylprednisolone (HDMP) and alemtuzumab (alem) both have activity in 17p disease and work independently of TP53. Prior work has demonstrated that giving HDMP/alem simultaneously is efficacious, but toxic. We hypothesized that giving these agents sequentially with ofatumumab (ofa) would maintain efficacy while decreasing toxicity. METHODS: This phase II study of ofa/HDMP followed by ofa/alem in CLL pts with 17p deletion or TP53 mutation employed a parallel 2-arm design (treatment-naive (TN) and relapsed/refractory (R/R)). Therapy was the same in both arms and included ofa/HDMP for 2-4 cycles (part A) followed by ofa/alem for 4-24 weeks, up to maximum response (part B). Responders could proceed to alloHSCT or a maintenance phase with ofa given q2 mo and alem given q2 wks (part C). Antimicrobial prophylaxis for PCP, HSV/VZV, and fungal infections was mandatory, as was G-CSF support. The primary objective was to estimate the ORR at the conclusion of the two-part induction therapy in both cohorts. Secondary objectives were to estimate the rate of CR, objective response by compartment, rate of MRD negativity by 4 color flow cytometry, PFS, and OS, rate at which transplant-eligible pts were able to proceed to alloHSCT, and to assess safety. Toxicity was assessed by IW-CLL and CTCAE v4.0. Response assessments by IW-CLL criteria were performed mid-way and at the end of parts A and B, and q6 mo. on part C. RESULTS: A total of 30 patients were enrolled. Baseline pt characteristics were as follows: TN (n=15): median age 64 (range 45-86), median WBC 58K, Hct 31, Plts 134, B2M 4.3, IGHV unmutated 79%, median %bone marrow (BM) involvement 80%. R/R (n=15): median age 65 (range 58-80), median WBC 31, Hct 33, Plts 114, B2M 4.5, IGHV unmutated 73%, median %BM involvement 60%, median # prior therapies 2 (range 1-4) including 9 pts with prior FCR or FR and 7 pts with prior BR. One patient in each arm had TP53 mutation without 17p deletion, and 4 pts had mut NOTCH1. The median number of copy number changes by SNP array was high, at 12.4 in the TN and 14 in the R/R cohorts. In the TN arm, 14/15 pts moved from part A->B, 5 moved from part B->C, and 5 moved on to alloHSCT in remission. The best ORR for the TN arm was 80% (67% PR, 13% CR), with 12/15 (80%) pts achieving BM MRD negativity. The TN 2-yr PFS and OS are 70% and 85%, respectively. In the R/R arm, 8/15 pts moved from part A->B, 4 moved from part B->C, and 5 moved on to alloHSCT in remission. The best ORR for the R/R arm was 68% (all PRs), with 8/15 (54%) pts achieving BM MRD negativity. The R/R 2-yr PFS and OS are 53% and 67%, respectively. Responses in both arms were independent of TP53 and NOTCH1 mutation status. Studywide, a greater number of somatic mutations was associated with shorter PFS and OS (HR 1.13 per mutation, 95% CI 1.02-1.25, p=0.015 and HR 1.185, 95% CI 1.047-1.341, p=0.0073, respectively). The most common grade 3/4 toxicities were: neutropenia (33%), thrombocytopenia (20%), anemia (10%). Infectious complications included pneumonia (5 cases, 1 Gr2, 3 Gr3, 1 Gr4), febrile neutropenia (2 cases, both Gr3), and cellulitis (1 case, grade 3). Four pts had low-level CMV reactivation, but no CMV infections occurred. Venous thromboembolism occurred in 3 pts. With a median follow-up time among survivors of 25 mo., 21 of the total 30 pts are still alive, and causes of death included: progressive disease n=6, infection n=3. 12/18 (67%) pts who were transplant eligible were able to proceed to HSCT. Discontinuations were due to: progressive/refractory disease (n=10, including 3 Richter's transformations (R/R n=2, TN n=1)), physician decision (n=2), and unacceptable toxicity (n=1). CONCLUSION: Ofa/HDMP followed by Ofa/alem is highly active for both TN and R/R CLL pts with del(17p) and/or TP53 mutation. In addition to a robust ORR, we observed a high rate of MRD-negativity in the bone marrow, which allowed most of the transplant-eligible pts to proceed to alloHSCT. Sequential dosing appears to reduce infectious complications compared to concurrent dosing. This regimen is a feasible option for pts with ultra-high risk CLL to facilitate maximal cytoreduction prior to alloHSCT. <> Disclosures Davids: Genentech: Other: ad board; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy.

Phase II trial of chemotherapy with high-dose FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab in the front-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and genotype UGT1A1*1/ UGT1A1*1 or UGT1A1*1/ UGT1A1*28 (FFCD 0504 trial). Results of a planned interim analysis

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4065-4065
Author(s):  
E. Mitry ◽  
O. Bouché ◽  
L. Dahan ◽  
F. Bonnetain ◽  
P. Laurent-Puig ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Severe Toxicity ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

4065 Background: The antitumor efficacy of irinotecan may be dose dependent. In a recent phase II trial, the combination of high-dose irinotecan (260 mg/m2) with LV5FU2 regimen was feasible with an acceptable safety profile and promising efficacy data (Ducreux et al. Oncology 2008;74:17–24). The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of the high-dose FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab in patients (pts) selected on the UGT1A1 polymorphism, which could be predictive of the irinotecan toxicity. Methods: Pts with UGT1A1 *1/*1 (group 1) or *1/*28 (group 2) genotypes and previously untreated mCRC were treated with bevacizumab 5 mg/kg D1, irinotecan 260 mg/m2 D1, LV 400 mg/m2 D1, 5FU 400 mg/m2 IV bolus D1 and 5FU 2400 mg/m2 46h infusion D1–2 every 2 weeks. Using Bryant & Day design with OR (independent review, H0 ≤ 40%; H1 : ≥ 60%) and toxicity (gr 4 neutropenia or febrile neutropenia or gr3–4 diarrhea; H0 ≥ 20%; H1≤ 5% ) as primary endpoints; a total of 108 pts, 54 in each group, was required (alpha 5% and power 80%) with a planned interim analysis after the inclusion of 17 pts by group. The trial will be stopped at interim analysis if ≤ 7 pts had an OR and/or ≥ 3 pts had a severe toxicity. All analyses were performed in ITT. Results: At the time of interim analysis, done for group 1 when the 17th pt had a 6-months follow-up, 96 pts have been included (group 1: 40 pts, group 2: 46 pts). An objective response rate was observed in 9/17 pts but 7/17 pts had a severe toxicity (gr 4 neutropenia: 2 pts, febrile neutropenia: 2 pts, gr 3 diarrhea: 4 pts). Overall, 14/17 pts had a gr3–4 toxicity. There was no toxic death. According to interim analysis rules, the trial was closed to inclusion (for both groups) on December 16th 2008 for toxicity. The interim analysis for pts of group 2 is planned for February 2009 when the 17th patient will have a 6-months follow- up. Conclusions: High-dose FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab, although effective, was associated with a high toxicity rate among pts with UGT1A1 *1/*1 genotype. Complete tolerance, efficacy and survival results for all included patients will be presented at the meeting. [Table: see text]

Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in the Treatment of AL Amyloidosis: Final Results of A Phase II Trial

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4084-4084
Author(s):  
Divya Nair ◽  
Vaishali Sanchorawala ◽  
Anthony C Shelton ◽  
Salli A Fennessey ◽  
Kathleen T Finn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Al Amyloidosis ◽  
Weekly Dose ◽  
Hematologic Response ◽  
Starting Dose ◽  
Tract Infections

Abstract Abstract 4084 AL amyloidosis is a plasma cell dyscrasia in which clonal immunoglobulin light chains misfold, forming fibrils that are deposited in tissues and vital organs. Immunomodulatory drugs including thalidomide, lenalidomide (LEN), and pomalidomide have activity in AL amyloidosis. We conducted a prospective phase II trial of LEN with dexamethasone (DEX) in the treatment of AL amyloidosis (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00091260), enrolling 82 patients from 2004–2011. We now report the final results of this trial. The majority of the patients were treated with LEN at a starting dose of 15 mg/d for 21 days out of a 28 day cycle, and received DEX at 20 or 40 mg weekly, depending upon age, congestive heart failure, and/or peripheral edema, and aspirin prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism (VTE) was used for most. Of the 82 patients, the median age was 62 (range, 40–84) and 63% were men. 95% of the patients had prior therapy for AL, often including high dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation. The median number of cycles delivered was 11 (range, 1–69). Of the 68 evaluable patients, 16% achieved a complete hematologic response, 44% achieved a partial hematologic response, 9% achieved a minor hematologic response, and 29% had no response to treatment. The median time to best hematologic response was 6 months. Sixty-three patients had quantifiable organ involvement prior to treatment with LEN/DEX, and 44% of those patients had measurable organ response. Reasons for discontinuation of study drug were side effects (29%), non-response (39%) and complete response or completion of trial (15%). The most common side effects during treatment were fatigue (88%), anemia (67%), muscle cramps (66%), dizziness/lightheadedness (60%), respiratory tract infections (55%), increased creatinine (56%) and skin rash (48%). In conclusion, LEN administration achieved a 60% hematologic response rate (CR+PR) even in heavily pre-treated AL patients, when used at a starting dose of 15 mg/d with weekly dose-modified DEX, VTE prophylaxis, and appropriate management of side effects. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Lenalidomide for AL amyloidosis. Sanchorawala:Millennium: Research Funding. Zeldis:Celgene: Employment. Seldin:Celgene: Research Funding.

A Phase II Trial of Myeloablative I-131-Tositumomab, Etoposide and Cyclophosphamide Followed by Autologous Transplantation for B-Cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 811-811
Author(s):  
Ajay K. Gopal ◽  
Ted A. Gooley ◽  
Joseph Rajendran ◽  
John M. Pagel ◽  
Darrell R. Fisher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Autologous Transplantation ◽  
Prospective Trial ◽  
Absorbed Dose ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem

Abstract Abstract 811 Background: High-dose therapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard of care for many patients (pts) with high-risk or relapsed B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL). Despite the use of transplant, relapse is likely for most with indolent or mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) as well as for aggressive B-NHL recurring after rituximab (R)-based chemotherapy. Total body irradiation (TBI) has been incorporated into ASCT regimens to overcome chemotherapy resistance and improve outcomes, but studies to date indicate that escalation of TBI is not feasible due to toxicity in non-target organs. We hypothesized that radioimmunotherapy (RIT) could supplant TBI and identified the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) of high-dose RIT using I-131-tositumomab that could be safely combined with high-dose etoposide (VP-16) and cyclophosphamide (CY) prior to ASCT (Press, Blood 2000). We now present the mature data of a large prospective phase II trial at the MTD of high-dose I-131-tositumomab, VP-16, and CY. Methods: Pts were eligible if they were <60 years of age, had MCL in first remission or any relapsed/refractory B-NHL, an ECOG PS of 0–1, acceptable organ function, >2×106 autologous CD34+ peripheral blood stem cells/kg collected, <20 Gy prior radiation to critical organs, and no human-anti-mouse-antibodies. All pts underwent outpatient biodistribution studies using tositumomab (1.7 mg/kg, n= 64 or 485mg flat dose, n= 43) labeled with ∼10mCi I-131 followed by serial quantitative gamma camera imaging to calculate individualized organ-specific absorbed dose estimates. Pts then received therapeutic infusions of I-131-tositumomab to deliver 25Gy to the critical normal organ receiving the highest radiation absorbed dose. When residual radiation was <7mR/hr at 1m (median 10 days) pts received 60mg/kg VP-16 followed 48 hours later by 100mg/kg CY. ASCT occurred when residual radiation was <2mR/hr at 1m. Toxicity was scored on the Bearman transplant scale and CTCAE 2.0. Response followed standard criteria. Results: Between June 1999 and April 2011 107 pts were transplanted on this protocol. Baseline characteristics included: median age 52 yrs (range 32–60), stage III/IV = 104 (97%), median number of prior regimens = 3 (range 1–11), prior R = 98 (92%), R refractory = 35 (33%), chemoresistant disease (defined as < a partial response [PR] to the most recent regimen) = 41 (40%), >1 extranodal site = 36 (33%), elevated LDH = 46 (42%). Histological strata: Indolent 43% (45 follicular lymphoma [FL], 1 lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma), MCL = 31%, Aggressive 27% (27 diffuse large B-cell including 12 with transformed disease, 2 Burkitt's). Dose limiting critical normal organs receiving up to 25Gy included lung (71), liver (29), kidney (6), and heart (1) from a median administered I-131 activity of 557 mCi (range 231–1353) resulting in a median whole body dose of 4.4Gy. ASCT occurred an average of 14 days after the I-131-tositumomab infusion with a median of 5.9×106 CD34/kg (range 2–20×106 CD34/kg). An unsupported ANC>500/μL and platelets >20K/μL occurred at a median of day 12 and day 13, respectively. Bearman toxicity of grade III/IV was observed in 6 pts (5.6%) with 3 (3%) non-relapse deaths (all cardiopulmonary toxicity) by day 100. Pulmonary toxicity of ≥ grade 4 CTCAE occurred in 10 (9%) pts. Responses to therapy included: CR/CRu = 87 (81%), PR = 8 (7%), SD = 11 (10%), and PD = 1 (1%). Currently, 76 (71%) pts are alive with 59 (55%) progression-free. The estimated 5-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and relapse were 72%, 56%, and 36%, respectively (figure, median follow up of 5.2 years). Five-year OS/PFS estimates for the 3 histological groups included indolent (81%/61%), aggressive (69%/51%), and MCL (57%/52%). MCL pts with relapsed/refractory disease had a 5-year OS/PFS of 55%/42%. Multivariable analysis only identified chemoresistant disease as associated with death (HR 3.07 (1.46–6.44, p=.003) and relapse or death (HR 2.12 (1.17–3.86, p=.01). Secondary AML/MDS occurred in 1 patient to-date. Conclusions: This largest prospective trial of myeloablative RIT demonstrates that I-131-tositumomab delivering 225Gy to critical organs along with high-dose VP-16 and CY prior to ASCT is feasible and effective with toxicities comparable to TBI-based regimens. These data provide the foundation for future approaches incorporating RIT into transplant conditioning regimens for lymphoma. Disclosures: Gopal: GSK: Research Funding; Spectrum: Research Funding. Off Label Use: high-dose use of I-131-tositumomab. Rajendran:GSK: Research Funding. Pagel:GSK: Research Funding. Maloney:GSK: Research Funding. Press:GSK: Research Funding.

Interim Analysis of a Phase II Pilot Trial of Ruxolitinib Combined with Danazol for Patients with Primary Myelofibrosis (MF), Post Essential Thrombocythemia-Myelofibrosis (Post ET), and Post Polycythemia Vera Myelofibrosis (PV MF) Suffering from Anemia

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 3206-3206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krisstina L. Gowin ◽  
Amylou C. Dueck ◽  
John O Mascarenhas ◽  
Ronald Hoffman ◽  
Craig B. Reeder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Polycythemia Vera ◽  
Clinical Improvement ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Intracranial Hemorrhage ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Jak Inhibitor ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Introduction: Approximately 75% of myelofibrosis (MF) patients develop anemia during evolution of the disease process predicting decreased survival. Previous studies exploring the effect of danazol in the treatment of anemia in MF demonstrate responses in anemia of 30-55%. Ruxolitinib has demonstrated improvement in MF related splenomegaly, symptom burden, and even survival yet improvements in cytopenias are uncommon. We designed a phase II multicenter pilot study to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of combination therapy with ruxolitinib and danazol in MF patients with anemia. Methods: This is a pre-planned interim analysis of a Simon optimum two-stage phase II trial designed to include a minimum of 10 and a maximum of 27 patients. Participants received ruxolitinib 10mg (plat >75 x10x9) BID or 5mg (plat <75 x10 x9) BID with danazol 200mg orally TID. Dose escalation was allowed after completion of 28 days for lack of response or for disease progression. Patients without progression were continued for 6 cycles at 56 days each. Treatment modifications were based on adverse events including thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, and elevation in creatinine and transaminases. Treatment responses were evaluated by the IWG-MRT response criteria (Blood 2013). Patient reported outcome questionnaires (MPN-SAF and EORTC QLQ-C30) were administered at baseline, prior to treatment cycles, and at study discontinuation. Results: Patients: Ten of the 12 evaluable patients enrolled (median age 70.5, range 57-78, M:F ratio 4:1) are included in this analysis. Eight patients had primary MF (PMF), 1 had post essential thrombocytosis (ET) MF, and 1 had post polycythemia vera (PV) MF. Jak2 V617F mutation was positive in 30%. At the time of enrollment 40% had received an erythrocyte transfusion in the last month and all were DIPSS Int-2 or higher. Median baseline hemoglobin was 9.0 g/dL (range 8.3 - 12.4). Median baseline platelet level was 172 x10 (9)/L (range 56 - 346). Most (90%) had received prior therapy and many were refractory to multiple lines of therapy prior to enrollment. Three (30%) patients had previously participated in a JAK inhibitor clinical trial. Tolerability: Among 6 patients who have completed treatment, median duration of treatment was 39 days (range 24-287) with treatment discontinuation due to progression of disease in 2 patients, allogeneic stem cell transplant in 1, alternative treatment in 1, unrelated adverse event (hyponatremia) in 1, and unrelated death (leukemic transformation with intracranial hemorrhage) in 1. Hematologic Grade 3 or > adverse events included anemia (60%), neutropenia (20%), and leukopenia (10%). Non-hematologic Grade 3 or > adverse events included electrolyte abnormalities (20%), edema (10%), infection (10%), and intracranial hemorrhage (10%). Efficacy: Treatment response per IWG-MRT response criteria included stable disease (SD) in 8/10 (80%), clinical improvement in 1/10 (10%), and progressive disease (PD) in 1 (10%). The median change in hemoglobin and platelet count from baseline was -0.05 g/dL (range -0.5 - 1.8) and 28.5 x10(9)/L (range -143 – 118) respectively, however 4/10 (40%) and 7/10 (70%) had improvement at some point during treatment in level of anemia and/or thrombocytopenia. The median follow-up time was 2 months (range 0.9-9.4). Among 6 patients with a baseline and at least one post-baseline MPN-SAF TSS, 2/6 (30%) of patients had at least a 10-point (clinically meaningful) improvement, with 1 of the 2 achieving the stricter 50% improvement from baseline. Responses might have been confounded due to impact of prior therapies. Conclusions: On interim analysis, ruxolitinib and danazol combination therapy demonstrates modest additional clinical benefit, however in a group of exceedingly high risk MF patients with significant anemia and prior single agent JAK inhibitor failures. Preliminary data suggests improvement in anemia and/or thrombocytopenia in some treated patients however only one clinical improvement per IWG-MRT criteria was observed. Combination therapy was well tolerated with no major incremental toxicity attributable to the addition of danazol. Maturation of data is needed to fully evaluate efficacy of ruxolitinib and danazol combination therapy prior to continuation of accrual. Disclosures Mascarenhas: Incyte Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Research Funding. Reeder:Millennium, Celgene, Novartis: Research Funding. Tibes:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Mesa:Incyte: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Gilead: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding; Ns Pharma: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Lilly: Research Funding; Cti: Research Funding.

Ibrutinib Monotherapy in Relapse or Refractory Primary CNS Lymphoma (PCNSL) and Primary Vitreo-Retinal Lymphoma (PVRL). Result of the Interim Analysis of the iLOC Phase II Study from the Lysa and the French LOC Network

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 784-784 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sylvain Choquet ◽  
Caroline Houillier ◽  
Fontanet Bijou ◽  
Roch Houot ◽  
Eileen Boyle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Primary Cns Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Cns Lymphoma ◽  
High Dose

Abstract RATIONAL Primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) is a diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), predominantly of non-germinal center (non-GC) subtype, carrying a pejorative prognosis. Constitutive activation of the NF-kB pathway via mutations in B cell receptor (BCR) pathway (CD79B) and mutation of MYD 88 and TBL1XR1 plays an important role in PCNSL. Ibrutinib, an inhibitor of BCR signaling, has been found to have significant therapeutic activity in relapsed or refractory non-CNS non-GC DLBCL. METHODS In this prospective, multicenter, open-label phase II, we enrolled immuno-competent patients over 18 with a refractory or relapse of PCNSL or primary vitreo-retinal lymphoma (PVRL) of DLBCL type. The treatment consisted in ibrutinib monotherapy given orally at 560 mg daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Additional corticosteroids treatment was allowed during the first 4 weeks of treatment in case of a threatening or symptomatic edema. Therapeutic responses were assessed according to the international primary CNS lymphoma collaborative group (IPCG) criteria. The primary objective of the study was the disease control (DC) rate (CR + CRu + PR + SD) after two months of treatment. This study is a two-stage Simon's design. Patients were evaluable for response if they received > 90 % of the expected dose during the first month of treatment. An interim analysis for futility was planned when 18 patients were evaluable for response. P0 and P1 hypotheses were < 10 % and > 30 % respectively. A total of 35 evaluable patients are required for the final analysis. Exploratory ancillary studies are planned and consist in dosage of ibrutinib in the cerebrospinal fluid after one cycle of treatment, and correlation of therapeutic response with mutational status of the disease. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02542514. RESULTS BetweenSeptember 25, 2015 and June 30, 2016, 52 patients were recruited in 10 French centers of the French LOC network for PCNSL. The interim analysis was done on the first 18 patients evaluable for response (median age: 70 y, range 49-80). At initial diagnosis, diagnoses were PCNSL (n = 12) and PVRL (n = 6). Patients were included in the study for a relapse (n = 13) or a progressive disease (n = 5). At time of inclusion in the study, disease status was PCNSL (n = 11) and PVRL or isolated intra-ocular relapse of a PCNSL (n = 7). ECOG performance status was 0, 1 and 2 in 4, 10 and 4 patients respectively. All the patients had previously received high-dose methotrexate-based chemotherapy. Four patients had previously received high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation. Patients had received 1, 2 or 3 prior treatments in 12, 5 and 1 cases respectively. Three patients had a concomitant meningeal involvement. Five patients received concomitant corticosteroids during the first month of treatment. At the time of analysis (median follow-up = 6.6 months), nine patients discontinued ibrutinib after a median duration of 3 months (range, 0.9 -6.4) because of a disease progressive(n = 8) or a concurrent illness (n=1). Median number of treatment cycles was 5 (range, 1-9). One patient experienced a pulmonary aspergillosis with a favorable outcome. No hemorrhagic complication was reported. Five patients died due to disease progression (n = 4), and concurrent illness (n = 1). After two months of treatment, a DC was achieved in 15/18 patients (83 %, IC 95 %, [59-96%]) (complete and unconfirmed complete response: n =3; partial response: n = 7; stable disease: n =5). CONCLUSION In this interim analysis, Ibrutinib monotherapy demonstrated a high DC rate of 83%, including 56% objective responses in patients with relapse/refractory PCNSL or PVRL. Regarding safety, Ibrutinib might be a risk factor for aspergillosis in this population of PCNSL patients, otherwise not exposed to fungal infection. A security warning was sent to all the investigators for a close monitoring of infections. The second cohort of patients has been recruited. Thirty-three patients are currently on study treatment. The final analysis of the iLOC study is awaited to confirm these encouraging results and better define the positioning of ibrutinib in the therapeutic strategy of PCNSL and PVR patients. Disclosures Choquet: Janssen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Ghesquieres:Mundipharma: Consultancy; Roche France: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Soussain:Celgene: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding.

Interim Results of A Randomized Phase II Trial of Azacitidine (AZA) +/− Epo In Lower Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) Resistant to An Erythropoietic Stimulating Agent (ESA) Alone

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1880-1880 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simone Boehrer ◽  
Odile Beyne-Rauzy ◽  
Thomas Prebet ◽  
Sophie Park ◽  
Agnès Guerci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Response Duration ◽  
Prolonged Treatment ◽  
Median Response ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii

Abstract Abstract 1880 Background: Red blood cell (RBC) cell transfusion dependency (TD) is an indicator of poor prognosis in IPSS low and int-1 (lower risk) MDS. In addition, median response duration to ESAs is only about 2 years (Park, Blood, 2008). AZA can lead to RBC transfusion independence (RBC-TI) in 30–40% of lower risk MDS (Lyons, JCO, 2009), but it has not been systematically evaluated in ESA-resistant lower risk MDS and it remains unknown if the combination of AZA and ESA would be useful in such patients (pts). Methods: In this randomized phase-II trial (GFMAzaEpo-2008-1 trial, NCT01015352), we compared AZA 75mg/m2/d for 5 days every 28 days for 6 cycles (AZA arm) to the same treatment plus epoetin beta 60000 U/week (AZA+EPO arm) in lower risk MDS. Inclusion criteria were: IPSS low or int-1 MDS resistant to ESA (i.e having received at least 12 weeks of EPO ≥60000 U/w or darbepoetin ≥250 μg/w or having relapsed after response to ESA), and with RBC-TD of at least 4 RBC units in the 8 weeks prior to enrollment. Responders in both arms were eligible for maintenance up to 12 monthly cycles, unless progression or loss of erythroid response occurred. The primary endpoint was major erythroid responses (HI-E major) after 6 courses, according to IWG 2000 criteria. Secondary endpoints included overall IWG 2000 HI-E, including major and minor, after 4 and 6 courses, response duration, IPSS progression, survival and toxicity. An interim analysis was planned after 49 of 98 planned patients were evaluable for response after 6 courses. Results: From Feb 09 to first of Jul 10, 96 pts were included (M/F=2:1); median age 72y (45-85); 3 pts did not receive any study drug and were excluded from the analysis (one consent withdrawal, one pancreatic cancer and one fatal cardiac event); 93 pts are the subject of this analysis (RARS=40, RCMD-RS=16, RCMD=12, RA=5, RAEB1=12, CMML=7, Unclassified=1). IPSS cytogenetics was favorable in 73, intermediate in 18, adverse in 1 (this pt was not excluded from the present analysis) and failed in 1 cases, with no imbalance for all these characteristics between arms. Overall, 68% of the pts were resistant to ESAs and 32% had lost response to ESA (after a median response duration of 32 weeks, range: 4–120). Median RBC-TD was 6 units (range: 4–16) in the 8 weeks prior to enrollment. Fifteen pts were too early for evaluation of response, 78 were evaluable for toxicity and 72 and 52 pts were evaluable for response after 4 and 6 courses, respectively, as 6 and 22 patients went off-study before 4 and 6 courses, respectively, due to toxicity or progression. Although overall HI-E rates were similar in the AZA and AZA+EPO arms, (40 and 36.5 % respectively, P=0.51), there was a trend for more frequent HI-E major after 6 courses (ie the primary endpoint of the study), in the AZA+EPO arm (7/22,32%), compared to the AZA arm (4/30,13%, P=0.17). Furthermore, in responding patients, the proportion of HI-E major was significantly greater in the AZA+EPO arm (87.5%) compared to the AZA arm (30%, P=0.03). Finally, a significant increase in HI-E major between 4 and 6 cycles was noted only in the AZA+EPO arm (P=0.016). Seventeen responding patients entered the maintenance phase. Of the 78 pts evaluable for toxicity, 22 (28%) had to be hospitalized at least once for an anemia-related event (N=6) and/or a clinical infection/febrile neutropenia (N= 16). Interestingly, only 6 pts had to be hospitalized in the AZA+EPO arm, compared to 16 in the AZA arm, (P=0.o4). Conclusions: In this first randomized study comparing AZA and AZA+ EPO in highly transfusion-dependent lower-risk MDS, this planned interim analysis shows a promising trend for more major HI-E in the AZA+EPO arm, suggesting that addition of EPO to AZA increases the frequency of major erythroid responses in those patients, and may also significantly decrease the hospitalization rate due to infectious and non-infectious complications, allowing more patients to receive prolonged treatment with azacitidine. Updated results will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures: Récher: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Vey:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Fenaux:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Gardin:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

scholarly journals A double-blinded randomised placebo-controlled phase II trial to evaluate high dose rifampicin for tuberculous meningitis: a dose finding study

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Dian ◽  
V Yunivita ◽  
AR Ganiem ◽  
T Pramaesya ◽  
L Chaidir ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Tuberculous Meningitis ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Geometric Mean ◽  
Dose Finding ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Double Blinded

ABSTRACTBackgroundHigh doses of rifampicin may help tuberculous meningitis (TBM) patients to survive. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic evaluations suggested that rifampicin doses higher than 13 mg/kg intravenously or 20 mg/kg orally (as previously studied) are warranted to maximize treatment response.MethodsIn a double-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled phase II trial, we assigned 60 adult TBM patients in Bandung, Indonesia, to standard 450 mg, 900 mg or 1350 mg (10, 20 and 30 mg/kg) oral rifampicin combined with other TB drugs for 30 days. Endpoints included pharmacokinetic measures, adverse events and survival.ResultsA double and triple dose of oral rifampicin led to three and five-fold higher geometric mean total exposures in plasma in the critical early days (2±1) of treatment (AUC0-24h: 53·5 mg.h/L vs 170·6 mg.h/L vs. 293·5 mg.h/L, p<0·001), with proportional increases in CSF concentrations and without an increase in the incidence of grade 3/4 adverse events. Six-month mortality was 7/20 (35%, 9/20 (45%) and 3/20 (15%) in the 10, 20 and 30 mg/kg groups, respectively (p=0·12).ConclusionsTripling the standard dose caused a large increase in rifampicin exposure in plasma and CSF and was safe. Survival benefit with this dose should now be evaluated in a larger phase III clinical trial.

scholarly journals Phase II Study of Brentuximab Vedotin Plus Ibrutinib for Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 130 (Suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 738-738
Author(s):  
Robert W. Chen ◽  
Joycelynne M. Palmer ◽  
Alex Francisco Herrera ◽  
Saro H. Armenian ◽  
Matthew Mei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Brentuximab Vedotin ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Background: Brentuximab vedotin (BV), an antibody drug conjugate (ADC), selectively delivers anti-tubulin agent monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) to CD 30+ cells. In a a multi-center phase II trial in patients with relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), BV showed an overall response rate (ORR) of 75%, a complete response (CR) rate of 34%, and a median duration of response (DOR) of 6.7 months (Younes A et al, JCO 2012). Although this drug has high ORR in HL, the CR rate and the DOR can be improved. Ibrutinib, a Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, has demonstrated antitumor activity in B-cell lymphomas. Ibrutinib is also an irreversible inhibitor of interleukin-2-inducible kinase (ITK), which has a critical role in T cell signaling. Inhibition of ITK leads to increased Th1 based immune response (Dubovsky JA, Blood 2013). As a single agent at standard dose, ibrutinib does not have antitumor activity in HL cell line (Figure 1). However, we have shown that standard dose ibrutinib is synergistic with BV in L428, a HL cell line (Figure 1). Based on our preclinical model, we hypothesize that ibrutinib may enhance the antitumor activity of BV in HL patients. It is also possible Ibrutinib may enchance the activity of BV through ITK inhibition of T cells in the HL microenvironment. Thus we designed and conducted a phase II trial using the combination of ibrutinib plus BV in patients with R/R HL. We report the planned interim analysis of efficacy and safety. Patients and Methods: This is a prospective, multicenter phase II trial with a 3-patient lead-in cohort in patients with relapsed/refractory HL. All patients must be &gt; 15 years old and have biopsy proven relapsed/refractory HL. Patients are treated with 1.8 mg/kg of BV intravenously every 3 weeks and ibrutinib 560 mg PO daily (420 mg PO daily in the lead-in cohort). Patients could have received prior BV. The primary endpoint was the CR rate according to Lugano 2014. Secondary endpoints were toxicities, ORR, duration of response, and, BTK/ITK receptor occupancy, and changes in T/B/NK cell subsets in peripheral blood. Results: Sixteen out of 39 patients were accrued thus far, all 16 pts were evaluable for toxicity, and 13 patients were evaluable for efficacy (3 lead-in pts excluded). The baseline characteristics (Figure 1) are: male (56%), Caucasian (75%), median age of 33 (17-69), stage III/IV at diagnosis (50%), primary refractory to induction (50%), refractory to last therapy (37%), and 4 patients had prior BV (25%). The overall best response (CR+PR) rate was 69%, CR rate was 46%, stable disease rate was 31%, and no progressive disease (PD) was seen. The disease control rate (CR+PR+SD) was 100%. One patient who was refractory to prior BV achieved a PR, and an additional patient who had a previous best response of PR to BV now achieved a CR. Treatment was well tolerated. There were no Grade 4 events. Grade 3 possibly-related toxicities included neutropenia (n=2) and hypokalemia (n=1). Grade I/II possibly related toxicities &gt;20% included diarrhea (n=8, 7 grade 1), nausea (n=6, all grade 1), fatigue (n=5, all grade 1), rash (n=5, 4 grade 1), and thrombocytopenia (n=4, all grade 1). Conclusion: The combination of BV + ibrutinib is well tolerated. Although the ORR of 69% maybe similar to BV alone, the CR of 46% and disease control rate of 100% appears promising. Especially encouraging is the 1 PR and 1 CR seen in patients previously exposed to BV. The study has met the interim analysis endpoint and warrants further accrual to investigate the final CR rate. Disclosures Chen: Pfizer: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Affimed: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding. Herrera: Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy. Kwak: Pepromene Bio: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Celltrion, Inc: Consultancy; InnoLifes: Consultancy, Equity Ownership.

A Phase II Trial Comparison of Once Versus Twice Weekly Bortezomib in CYBORD Chemotherapy for Newly Diagnosed Myeloma: Identical High Response Rates and Less Toxicity.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 616-616 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig B. Reeder ◽  
Donna E. Reece ◽  
Vishal Kukreti ◽  
Joseph R. Mikhael ◽  
Christine Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
High Dose Dexamethasone ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Cell Harvest

Abstract Abstract 616 Background: We have shown the three drug combination of cyclophosphamide, bortezomib and dexamethasone (CyBorD) to be highly active therapy in newly diagnosed myeloma while allowing stem cell harvest and transplantation (Reeder et al. Leukemia 2009; 23:1337-1341). However, twice weekly bortezomib and high dose dexamethasone have been shown to cause significant toxicities. In a prospective Phase II we modified CyBorD by using bortezomib once weekly and reducing the dexamethasone to “low dose dex” after the first two cycles in an attempt to reduce toxicity (cohort 2). We report the efficacy and toxicity of this modified regimen and compare the results to standard CyBorD (cohort 1). Patients and methods: 63 untreated symptomatic patients were enrolled on this Phase II trial (33 on cohort 1 and 30 on cohort 2). All are evaluable for response and toxicity. Treatment on cohort 2 consisted of oral cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2 and IV bortezomib 1.5 mg/m2 days 1, 8, 15 and 22 and dexamethasone 40 mg by mouth days 1-4, 9-12, 17-20 in cycles 1 and 2, then 40 mg po days 1, 8, 15, 22 in cycles 3 and beyond. Cohort 1 used standard dosing of bortezomib and high dose dexamethasone throughout. Each cycle was 28 days. Acyclovir and a quinolone antibiotic prophylaxis were routinely used. Patients were evaluated for response and toxicity every cycle and were offered stem cell harvest and transplant after the 4th cycle but could continue up to 12 cycles maximum. Results: The median age for all 63 patients was 61 (36-74) years and 48% were female. Durie-Salmon stages were 47% II and 50% III and ISS stages I 43%, II 36%, and III 21%. Twenty-four percent of patients were genetic high risk (t(4;14) or deletion 17). Cohorts I and II were matched for age, gender and ECOG PS. ISS stages were higher in cohort 1 than cohort 2 (II/III 67% vs. 44%). The intent to treat (ITT) ORR (≥PR) for all 63 patients (cohorts 1 and 2) is 90% with 60% ≥VGPR. For cohort 2 (modified CyBorD) the ITT overall response (≥PR) was 93% (CR: 5, nCR: 7, VGPR: 6, PR: 10) with 60% ≥VGPR and 40% ≥ nCR. Those completing all 4 cycles of therapy had 92% ORR (24/26) and 65% (17/26) ≥VGPR. A comparison of response rates in cohorts 1 and 2 is shown in table 1. These high and comparable response rates were associated with fewer grade 3+ adverse events (AE's) than in cohort 1 (37% vs. 48%) and no grade 3 peripheral neuropathy (PN). The median follow-up for all 63 patients is 12.4 (2.8-29.2) months and 95% of patients are alive with 87% free from progression. Conclusions: Modified CyBorD with weekly bortezomib and reduced dexamethasone retains the high activity seen in standard CyBorD, but is less toxic and more convenient. Interestingly, this modified regimen allowed higher overall doses of bortezomib (5.2 vs. 6.0 mg/m2 per cycle) yet overall neuropathy rates were similar. This combination of a weekly alkylating agent with bortezomib and dexamethasone is well tolerated and produces high response rates in newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma. Disclosures: Reeder: Millennium (MPI): Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Reece:Ortho Biotech: Honoraria, Research Funding. Chen:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ortho Biotech: Honoraria. Hentz:Millennium (MPI): Research Funding. Fonseca:Otsuka: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Medtronic: Consultancy; Genzyme: Consultancy. Bergsagel:Merck: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Stewart:Proteolix: Honoraria; Millennium (MPI): Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document