Bleeding in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Treated with Non Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants: A Population-Based Study

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 343-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin H. Ellis ◽  
Tsipora Neumann ◽  
Jeffrey S Ginsberg ◽  
John W Eikelboom ◽  
Haim Bitterman ◽  
...  

Abstract INTRODUCTION Recent large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are at least as effective as vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for prevention of stroke or systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and are associated with similar or lower rates of bleeding. The results for bleeding seen in Phase 3 trials might not be applicable to real world practice. We performed a large population-based study to determine the incidence of bleeding in patients with AF beginning treatment with dabigatran, rivaroxaban or a VKA. METHODS From the computerized database of the 4.5 million member Israeli Clalit Health Services health care provider, consecutive patients initiating a VKA or NOAC for AF between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2013 were studied. For prevention of embolism in AF, dabigatran had regulatory approval for 36 months and rivaroxaban for 24 months. Bleeding patients who required hospitalization were identified and key clinical and laboratory data were recorded. Because patients received different anticoagulants for different durations, time-to-event analyses were performed and bleeding incidences were calculated and reported as rates per 100 patient-years of treatment. Bleeding sites and all-cause mortality within 30 days were recorded and case fatality rates were calculated as the proportions of bleeding patients who died within 30 days. RESULTS (Table1) 18249 patients initiated anticoagulants for AF: 9564 received VKA, 4170 received dabigatran 110 mg bid , 1806 received dabigatran 150 mg bid and 2709 received rivaroxaban. The bleeding rates per 100 patient-years were 3.9 in VKA-treated patients, 2.8 in dabigatran 150 mg patients, 4.6 in dabigatran 110 mg patients and 4.3 in rivaroxaban patients. The intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) rates per 100 patient-years were 0.70 in VKA-treated patients, 0.37 in dabigatran 150 mg patients, 0.49 in dabigatran 110 mg patients and 0.27 in rivaroxaban patients. The gastrointestinal (GI) hemorrhage rates per 100 patient-years were 1.88 in VKA-treated patients, 1.85 in dabigatran 150 mg patients, 3.36 in dabigatran 110 mg patients and 2.39 in rivaroxaban patients. The case fatality rate for any bleed was 21%; for ICH 28.8%, and for GI bleeds it was 11.1%. Multivariate analysis revealed that increased age and increased serum creatinine were risk factors for bleeding in NOAC-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS The results of our population-based non-randomized study of AF patients are consistent with the RCTs in showing similar rates of overall bleeding, an increase in GI bleeding associated with dabigatran and a reduction in ICH seen with both dabigatran and rivaroxaban. Table 1: Clinical profile of patient cohort VKA Dabigatran 150 mg Dabigatran 110 mg Rivaroxaban Overall Number of patients 9564 1806 4170 2709 18249 Age in years) Median (Range) 79 (27-99) 78 (52-89) 82 (55-95) 82 (58-91) 80 (27-99) Women % 43.8 45.1 47 38.6 43.7 Serum creatinine mg/dL Median (Range) 1.2 (0.3-11.6) 1.0 (0.5-4.4) 1.2 (0.4-4.1) 1.3 (0.5-3.5) 1.2 (0.3-11.6) CHADS2 score Median (Range) 3 (0-6) 3 (1-6) 4 (1-6) 4 (2-6) 3 (0-6) Anti aggregant use (%) 52 50 35 55 48 Bleeds per 100 patient years (N) 3.9 (372) 2.8 (50) 4.6 (191) 4.3 (116) (729) Fatalities within 1 month of hemorrhage N 44 8 15 3 70 Intracranial hemorrhage N 67 4 16 3 90 Gastrointestinal hemorrhage N 178 20 108 26 332 Disclosures Ellis: Boehringer Ingelheim: Honoraria. Eikelboom:Bayer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Meyers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria, Research Funding.

2015 ◽  
Vol 114 (11) ◽  
pp. 1076-1084 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franziska Michalski ◽  
Luise Tittl ◽  
Sebastian Werth ◽  
Ulrike Hänsel ◽  
Sven Pannach ◽  
...  

SummaryAtrial fibrillation (AF) patients treated with well-controlled vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) may benefit less from non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) because they are supposed to be at low risk of thromboembolic and bleeding complications. However, little is known about the selection, management, and outcome of such “stable” VKA patients in current practice. We assessed characteristics, VKA persistence and 12 months' outcome of AF patients selected for VKA continuation. On March 1, 2013, the Dresden NOAC registry opened recruitment of patients continuing on VKA for sites that had been actively recruiting AF patients treated with NOACs in the prior 18 months. Patient characteristics were compared with those of NOAC patients from the same sites. Four hundred twenty-seven VKA patients had a significantly lower bleeding risk profile compared with 706 patients selected for NOAC treatment. For VKA, international normalised ratio time-in-therapeutic range before enrolment was 71% and increased to 75% during a mean follow-up of 15 months. Rates of stroke/transient ischaemic attack/systemic embolism were 1.3/100 patient-years (intention-to-treat) and 0.94/100 patient-years (as-treated). On-treatment rate of ISTH major bleeding was 4.15/100 patient-years (95% CI 2.60–6.29) with a case-fatality rate of 16.3% (all-cause mortality at day 90 after major bleeding). In conclusion, in daily care, AF patients selected for VKA therapy are healthier than those treated with NOAC, demonstrate a high quality of anticoagulant control and very low stroke rates. However, despite adequate patient selection and INR control, the risk of major VKA bleeding is unacceptably high and bleeding outcome is poor.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Proietti ◽  
L Cortesi ◽  
F Spagnoli ◽  
A Nobili ◽  
A Marengoni

Abstract Introduction The introduction of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) changed the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients, promising a better safety profile and a lower chance of interaction with drugs than vitamin K antagoniste (VKA). Aim To evaluate the prevalence of possible drug-drug interactions (DDIs) in a cohort of newly anticoagulated AF patients, their impact on outcomes and possible differences between VKA and NOACs users. Methods We performed an analysis derived from administrative databases in Lombardy Italian region. All patients ≥40 years admitted from 01/06/2013 to 30/06/2018 with an AF diagnosis that were VKA or NOACs new users were included in this analysis. Possible DDIs were evaluated according to the prescription of OAC therapy, on the basis of current available evidence. Stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), any bleeding and all-cause death were the study outcomes. Results Among the 122816 patients included in the analysis, mean (SD) age 76.3 (9.6) with 47.3% females, a mean (SD) CHA2DS2-VASc of 3.5 (1.4) was found. A total of 70180 (57.1%) patients were prescribed with VKA and 52636 (42.9%) with NOACs. A possible DDI was recorded in 63273 (51.5%). Patients exposed to DDIs were older and less likely female (both p<0.0001) and with a higher mean (SD) CHA2DS2-VASc (p<0.0001). Rate of stroke, ICH, any bleeding and all-cause death were higher in those patients exposed to DDIs (all p<0.001). After full adjustment, exposure to possible DDIs was associated with an increased risk for any bleeding (HR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.05–1.12) and all-cause death (HR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.07–1.13), with no differences for stroke and ICH. Comparing VKA and NOACs patients exposed to possible DDIs, we found that VKA users exposed to possible DDIs, after adjustments, were at higher risk for all the outcomes (Table). Conclusions In a large cohort of AF patients newly prescribed with OAC, possible DDIs were largely prevalent, in particular in VKA users. Presence of a possible DDI is associated with an increased risk of any bleeding and all-cause death. VKA users exposed to a possible DDI were at higher risk for any outcome than NOACs users exposed to a possible DDI. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Siwaporn Deeprom ◽  
Thanit Chirananthavat

Abstract Background and Aims Lifelong oral anticoagulation (either with warfarin or a non–vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOACs)) is indicated for stroke prevention in most patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). NOACs has been recommended for thromboembolism prophylaxis of nonvalvular AF. However, studies on the impact of NOACs on renal outcomes has been inconclusive. Method This retrospective cohort study compared 3 NOACs: apixaban, dabigatran and rivaroxaban to warfarin for their effects on renal outcomes in patients with nonvalvular AF who had been using these medications for at least 2 years as of 2017-2018. The primary outcome was either the incidence of > 30% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) or doubling of the serum creatinine levels compare to baseline values at 24 months, and the secondary outcome was the incident of primary outcomes in different baseline eGFR subgroups (> 60 vs < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2) and major bleeding as an adverse event. Results 90 patients were enrolled in each group, totaling to 360 patients. The incidence of > 30% decline in eGFR is significantly higher in rivaroxaban compared to warfarin (hazard ratio: 2.09; 95% confidence interval: 1.35 to 3.24; p = 0.001). After multivariate analysis (using age, stage of chronic kidney disease, eGFR, CHAD2VAS and HASBLED score), dabigatran was also shown to significantly increase the incidence of > 30% decline in eGFR. In subgroup analysis, rivaroxaban resulted in higher incidence of > 30% decline in eGFR, in eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 subgroup and higher incidence of doubling of the serum creatinine level in eGFR > 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 subgroup. There was no occurrence of major bleeding. Conclusion NOACs, especially rivaroxaban, may increase adverse renal outcomes in patients with nonvalvular AF.


BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. e031342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Ruigómez ◽  
Pareen Vora ◽  
Yanina Balabanova ◽  
Gunnar Brobert ◽  
Luke Roberts ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo determine discontinuation rates, patterns of use and predictors of discontinuation of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in the first year of therapy.DesignPopulation-based cohort study.SettingUK primary care.Population11 481 patients with NVAF and a first prescription (index date) for apixaban, dabigatran or rivaroxaban (January 2012 to December 2016) with at least 1 year of follow-up and at least one further NOAC prescription in the year following the index date were identified. 1 year rates and patterns of discontinuation were described.Primary and secondary outcome measuresOutcome measures were the percentage of patients who, in the first year from starting NOAC therapy, discontinued with their oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy (discontinuation was defined as a gap in OAC therapy of >30 days); switched OAC within 30 days; discontinued and reinitiated OAC therapy. Predictors of discontinuation were also evaluated.Results1 year discontinuation rates according to the index NOAC were 26.1% for apixaban, 40.0% for dabigatran and 29.6% for rivaroxaban. Reinitiation rates were 18.1% for apixaban, 21.7% for dabigatran and 17.3% for rivaroxaban, and switching rates were 2.8% for apixaban, 8.8% for dabigatran and 4.9% for rivaroxaban. More than 93% of reinitiations were with the index NOAC. Patients starting on dabigatran were more likely to switch OAC therapy than those starting on apixaban; ORs 4.28 (95% CI 3.24 to 5.65) for dabigatran and 1.89 (95% CI 1.49 to 2.39) for rivaroxaban. Severely reduced renal function was a predictor of any discontinuation, OR 1.77 (95% CI 1.28 to 2.44).ConclusionWhile the majority of patients with NVAF in the UK initiating NOAC treatment received continuous therapy in the first year of treatment, a substantial proportion of patients experienced gaps in treatment leaving them less protected against thromboembolism during these periods.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin‐Yi Hsu ◽  
Peter Pin‐Sung Liu ◽  
An‐Bang Liu ◽  
Shu‐Man Lin ◽  
Huei‐Kai Huang ◽  
...  

Background A higher risk of developing dementia is observed in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Results are inconsistent regarding the risk of dementia when patients with AF use different anticoagulants. We aimed to investigate the risk of dementia in patients with AF receiving non‐vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) compared with those receiving warfarin. Methods and Results We conducted a nationwide population‐based cohort study of incident cases using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. We initially enlisted all incident cases of AF and then selected those treated with either NOACs or warfarin for at least 90 days between 2012 and 2016. First‐ever diagnosis of dementia was the primary outcome. We performed propensity score matching to minimize the difference between each cohort. We used the Fine and Gray competing risk regression model to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) for dementia. We recruited 12 068 patients with AF (6034 patients in each cohort). The mean follow‐up time was 3.27 and 3.08 years in the groups using NOACs and warfarin, respectively. Compared with the HR for the group using warfarin, the HR for dementia was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.73–0.92; P =0.0004) in the group using NOACs. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that users of NOAC aged 65 to 74 years, with a high risk of stroke or bleeding were associated with a lower risk of dementia than users of warfarin with similar characteristics. Conclusions Patients with AF using NOACs were associated with a lower risk of dementia than those using warfarin. Further randomized clinical trials are greatly needed to prove these findings.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document