Human Herpes Virus 6 Infection in 54 Patients after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Clinical Manifestations and Outcome

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 3899-3899
Author(s):  
Raffaella Greco ◽  
Lara Crucitti ◽  
Sara Racca ◽  
Roee Dvir ◽  
Francesca Lorentino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
P Value ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Clinical Complications ◽  
Log Rank Test ◽  
Blue Line

Abstract BACKGROUND: Human herpesvirus type 6 (HHV-6) is increasingly recognized as an opportunistic and potentially life-threatening pathogen in recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AlloSCT). HHV-6 is a member of the beta herpesvirus subfamily (genus Roseolovirus). HHV-6 infection is recognized as the cause of a febrile disease and exanthem subitum in early childhood. Approximately 60% of solid organ transplant and 40% of patients after alloSCT experienced HHV-6 reactivation. Reported clinical manifestations of HHV-6 infection in transplanted patients are skin rash, interstitial pneumonia, bone marrow suppression and encephalitis. Moreover, some clinical reports suggest that HHV-6 can facilitate the occurrence of severe clinical complications of alloSCT, increasing transplant-related mortality. METHODS: From January 2009 to February 2013, we retrospectively evaluated 54 consecutive adult patients (median age 50 years) who developed positivity to HHV-6 after alloSCT for high-risk hematological malignancies. Stem cell donors were family haploidentical (37), HLA identical sibling (8), unrelated volunteer (6), cord blood (3). The viral load was determined by quantitative PCR (Nanogen Advanced Diagnostic S.r.L) in cell-free body fluids such as plasma, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), bone marrow (BM) aspirates or in gastrointestinal biopsies. RESULTS: Median time from alloSCT to HHV-6 reactivation was 34 days (range: 0-705). Thirty-one patients presented HHV-6 positive in plasma, 9/54 in BM, 33/54 in gut biopsies or BAL, 7/54 in CSF. At the time of viral positivity all pts were receiving acyclovir as viral prophylaxis except five. Twenty-nine patients had acute graft versus host disease (GvHD). Twenty-two out of these twenty-nine patients experienced a grade III-IV acute GvHD, requiring high dose steroids in twenty-six cases. A concomitant CMV positivity was detected in 15/54 patients. The median absolute count of CD3+ lymphocytes was 207 cells/mcl. In 52/54 cases we reported HHV-6 clinical manifestations: fever (43), skin rash (22), hepatitis (19), diarrhoea (24), encephalitis (10), BM suppression (18), delayed engraftment (11). HHV-6 positivity led to antiviral pharmacological treatment in 37/54 cases, using as first choice therapy foscarnet. Amongst the total fifty-four patients with documented HHV-6 positivity thirty-one solved the clinical event. However the mortality rate was relatively high in this population (overall survival (OS) ±SE at 1 year after HHV-6 reactivation was 38% ± 7%), mainly related to severe infections or GvHD. A better OS is significantly associated with CD3+ cells ≥200/mcl at the time of HHV-6 reactivation (fig 1) (OS at 1 year 63% compared to 11% for patients with CD3 <200/mcl; HR: 0.27, 95% CI 0.12-0.54, p=0.0002). The overall survival of these patients was also positively affected by the absence of acute GvHD grade III-IV at time of viral reactivation (HR: 0.03, 95% CI 1.08-4.03, p=0.03) and by the complete disease remission at time of HSCT (HR:0.26, 95% CI 0.07-0.89, p=0.03). In this analysis the overall survival was not significantly influenced by steroids administration (HR: 1.36, 95% CI 0.71-2.60, p=0.36), time after alloSCT (HR: 1.30, 95% CI 0.51-3.33, p=0.59), type of antiviral prophylaxis (HR: 1.02, 95% CI 0.45-2.33, p=0.96), plasma viral load (HR:1.18, 95% CI 0.51-2.76, p=0.69) and organ involvement (HR:1.14, 95% CI 0.59-2.20, p=0.70). CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study confirms a correlation of HHV-6 with high morbidity and mortality rates after alloSCT, thus suggesting a regular HHV-6 monitoring in alloSCT recipients. The regular monitoring of HHV-6 DNA, using a real-time PCR assay, may be useful for identifying active HHV-6 infection and for the introduction of a pre-emptive treatment, possibly reducing the incidence of the most severe clinical complications. Despite HHV-6 detection typically occurred early after alloSCT, a better immune reconstitution has the potential to improve clinical outcome. Figure 1: Overall survival after alloSCT in HHV-6 positive patients: green line showed patients with more than 200/mcl CD3+ cells, blue line the ones with less than 200/mcl CD3+ cells at HHV-6 reactivation. P value is provided by Log Rank test. Figure 1:. Overall survival after alloSCT in HHV-6 positive patients: green line showed patients with more than 200/mcl CD3+ cells, blue line the ones with less than 200/mcl CD3+ cells at HHV-6 reactivation. P value is provided by Log Rank test. Disclosures Bonini: MolMed S.p.A.: Consultancy.

Human Herpes Virus 6 Reactivation and Disease After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 4539-4539
Author(s):  
Raffaella Greco ◽  
Francesca Lorentino ◽  
Lara Crucitti ◽  
Luca Vago ◽  
Maria Teresa Lupo Stanghellini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Viral Load ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
P Value ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Clinical Complications

Background Human herpesvirus type 6 (HHV-6) is a member of the beta herpesvirus subfamily (genus Roseolovirus) and two distinct variants have been described: types A and B. HHV-6 infection is recognized as the cause of a febrile disease and exanthem subitum in early childhood. The infection rarely causes serious events in healthy individuals, but viral reactivation in immunocompromised patients is frequently associated with severe clinical manifestations. Above all HHV-6 is increasingly recognized as an opportunistic and potentially life-threatening pathogen in recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AlloSCT). Approximately 60% of solid organ transplant and 40% of patients undergoing alloSCT experience HHV-6 reactivation, mainly of variant B. Reported clinical manifestations of HHV-6 infection in transplanted patients are skin rash, interstitial pneumonia, bone marrow suppression and encephalitis. Moreover, some clinical reports suggest that HHV-6 can facilitate the occurrence of severe clinical complications of alloSCT, increasing transplant-related mortality. Methods From January 2009 to February 2013, we retrospectively evaluated 54 consecutive adult patients (median age 50 years) who developed positivity to HHV-6 after alloSCT for high-risk hematological malignancies. Stem cell donors were family haploidentical (37), HLA identical sibling (8), unrelated volunteer (6), cord blood (3). The viral load was determined by quantitative PCR (Nanogen Advanced Diagnostic S.r.L) in cell-free body fluids such as plasma, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), bone marrow (BM) aspirates or in gastrointestinal biopsies. Results Median time from alloSCT to HHV-6 reactivation was 34 days (range: 0-705). Thirty-one patients presented HHV-6 positive in plasma, 9/54 in BM, 33/54 in gut biopsies or BAL, 7/54 in CSF. At the time of viral positivity all pts were receiving acyclovir as viral prophylaxis except five. Twenty-nine patients had acute graft versus host disease (GvHD). Twenty-two out of these twenty-nine patients experienced a grade III-IV acute GvHD, requiring high dose steroids in twenty-six cases. A concomitant CMV positivity was detected in 15/54 patients. The median absolute count of CD3+ lymphocytes was 262 cells/mcl. In 52/54 cases we reported HHV-6 clinical manifestations: fever (43), skin rash (22), hepatitis (19), diarrhoea (24), encephalitis (10), BM suppression (18), delayed engraftment (11). HHV-6 positivity led to antiviral pharmacological treatment in 37/54 cases, using as first choice therapy foscarnet. Amongst the total fifty-four patients with documented HHV-6 positivity thirty-one solved the clinical event. However the mortality rate was relatively high in this population (only 30% of patients were alive), mainly related to severe infections or GvHD. A better overall survival is significantly associated with CD3+ cells higher than 200/mcl (p-value 0.011) and time after alloSCT more than 2 months (p-value 0.035). In this analysis the overall survival was not significantly influenced by steroids administration, presence of acute GvHD, plasma viral load and organ involvement. Conclusions This retrospective study further demonstrates the correlation between HHV-6 reactivation and high morbidity and mortality rates in patients after alloSCT. Despite HHV-6 detection typically occurred in the first month after AlloSCT, a better immune reconstitution has the potential to improve the outcome. The regular monitoring of HHV-6 DNA, using a real-time PCR assay, may be useful for identifying active HHV-6 infection and for the introduction of a pre-emptive treatment, possibly reducing the incidence of the most severe clinical complications. Disclosures: Bonini: MolMed SpA: Consultancy.

Race, Access to Care, and Outcome After Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1509-1509
Author(s):  
Erin T Alexander ◽  
Robert K Stuart ◽  
Luciano J Costa
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Access To Care ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Log Rank Test

Abstract Abstract 1509 Background: Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) is an essential modality in the management of younger, newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Some reports have indicated inferior survival for African-American (AA) patients following diagnosis of MM, when compared to Caucasian (Ca) patients. We hypothesized that previously claimed racial differences in outcome may reflect disparity in access to care and might be negated by timely, standard, and uniform treatment. Methods: We reviewed a mature database of MM patients undergoing AHSCT at a single institution to describe and compare overall survival from diagnosis and from transplantation in AA and Ca patients. Additionally, we described time from diagnosis to transplantation in both cohorts as an additional surrogate of access to care. Results: Between August 1996 and July 2010, 128 patients underwent a first AHSCT for MM at the institution. Fifty-three patients (41%) were AA and 75 (59%) were Ca. Median age at the time of diagnosis was 54.7 years for AA and 58.3 for Ca. Sixty-six (52%) of patients were female. One hundred twenty-six (98%) patients received conditioning chemotherapy with Melphalan 200 mg/m2. Median interval from diagnosis to transplant was 10 months (IQR 7.1–15.9) for AA and 9.2 months (IQR 6.7–15.6) for Ca (p=0.23). Median overall survival for the entire group was 63 months (95% C.I. 51–76) from time of diagnosis and 51.8 months (95% C.I. 39–63) from AHSCT. There was no difference in overall survival from time of AHSCT between AA and Ca, respectively 62.6 (95% C.I. 30.9–94.4) and 51.8 months (95% C.I. 33.5–70.3, Log-rank test P=0.76). Similarly, no significant difference was seen in overall survival from time of diagnosis between AA and Ca, respectively 70.4 (95% C.I. 29.6–111.3) and 59.3 months (95% C.I. 46.8–71.8), as displayed in the Figure (Log-rank test P=0.36). Conclusion: These findings suggest that previously reported differences in outcome between AA and CA patients with MM are related to disparities in access to healthcare and not intrinsic biological differences. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Extramedullary Leukemia and Myeloid Sarcoma in AML: Results From a Population-Based Registry Study of 2261 Patients

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 2003-2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lene S.G. Oestgaard ◽  
Henrik Sengeloev ◽  
Mette S. Holm ◽  
Hans E. Johnsen ◽  
Marianne T. Severinsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Myeloid Sarcoma ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
P Value ◽  
Log Rank Test

Abstract Abstract 2003 The prognosis of patients suffering from AML with manifestations of accompanying extramedullary leukemia (EML) including myeloid sarcoma (MS) compared to that of AML patients not exhibiting EML manifestations is still an open question as results from previous studies have been contradictory most likely due to selection bias. Here we present an analysis performed in a cohort of 2261 patients representing >90% of all AML patients diagnosed and treated in Denmark during the eleven-year period January 2000 through December 2010. The goal was to investigate the prognostic impact of presence of EML at time of AML diagnosis by a retrospective population- and registry-based analysis Of these patients, 219 (9.7%) showed signs of EML at time of AML presentation. Anatomic sites of EML were: lymph nodes (3.0%), skin (2.7%), spleen (1.7%), oral (1.3%), CNS (0.4%), testes (0.2%), other sites (1.1%), and two or more anatomical sites (0.5%). In 27 cases myeloid sarcoma was not accompanied by AML in the bone marrow and, thus, presented as isolated MS. In total, 1168 of the 2261 (52 %) patients were treated with curative intention. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (Standard allo in 105 cases, and reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) transplant in 90 cases) was conducted in a total of 195 patients (118 in CR1, 65 in CR2, and 12 during other disease stages). Overall the frequencies of allogeneic transplantations in curatively treated patients were 13.7% in patients with EML and 8.5% in patients without EML. The presence of EML at time of leukemia diagnosis had no statistical significance to probability of obtaining complete remission (CR), nor to duration of overall survival (OS) (Table 1. and Fig. 1). By contrast, well-established prognostic parameters such as presenting cytogenetic abnormalities (categorized according to revised MRC-criteria, D. Grimwade et al. Blood, 2010), age, leukocyte count, and type of leukemia (secondary vs de novo) were all found to be statistically significant to probability of attainment of (CR) and to duration of OS in uni- as well as multivariate analyses. Gender was of borderline statistical significance with respect to probability of attainment of CR and to OS (Table 1).Figure 1Years from AML diagnosisPatients with EML(n = 132)Patients without EML(n = 1007)p-value (log-rank test) = 0.51Figure 1. Years from AML diagnosis. / Patients with EML. / (n = 132). / Patients without EML. / (n = 1007). / p-value (log-rank test) = 0.51Table 1.Factors of significance to probability of attainment of CR and to overall survival (OS)Probability of CR (Logistic regression, nevaluable = 927)Probability of overall survival (Cox regression, nevaluable = 958)VariableOdds ratio (OR)95% CI of ORP valueHazard ratio95% CI of HRP valueEML––0.82––0.54Age1.061.04–1.08<10−41.041.03–1.04<10−4Cytogenetics2.291.63–3.21<10−41.931.65–2.25<10−4Male gender1.481.03–2.070.03––0.06    WBC1.0051.002–1.007<10−41.0011.000–1.0020.02    Secondary2.151.47–3.14<10−41.391.15–1.680.001 Additionally, patients with EML at leukemia presentation who were subjected to an allogeneic stem cell transplantation had a prognosis no different from that of AML patients not exhibiting signs of EML (Fig.2). Analyses of progression free survival are ongoing and will be presented at the meeting.Figure 2Years from AML diagnosisPatients without EML(n = 165)Patients with EML(n = 30)p-value (log-rank test) = 0.75Figure 2. Years from AML diagnosis. / Patients without EML. / (n = 165). / Patients with EML. / (n = 30). / p-value (log-rank test) = 0.75 From this analysis we conclude that presence of EML does not predict for an inferior CR-rate or for shorter survival in AML. We find no clear justification for a more aggressive therapeutic approach or performance of allogeneic stem cell transplantation in AML patients with EML. Therapeutic decisions should be guided by other prognostic parameters, e.g., age and cytogenetic aberrations which are of far greater importance than the presence of EML. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

MRD assessment using NGS in patients with acute myeloid leukemia undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Meta-analysis.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19002-e19002
Author(s):  
Osama Mosalem ◽  
Mahmoud Abdelsamia ◽  
Haitham Abdelhakim
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
P Value ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem

e19002 Background: The presence of measurable residual disease (MRD) preceding hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is increasingly recognized as a risk factor for leukemic relapse and decreased survival. Over many years, attempts have been looking at developing tools to detect MRD; this includes multiparametric flow cytometry, quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and most recently, next-generation sequencing (NGS). NGS offers higher sensitivity and detection rate of disease-related gene mutations, thereby potentially improving disease outcomes. Our study sought to review the scientific literature that included NGS‐detected molecular MRD in patients with AML who underwent bone marrow transplantation. Methods: We performed a systematic search using PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE, and SCOPUS up until October 2020. Inclusion criteria included articles that reported the association between pre-HSCT MRD detected by NGS and post HSCT outcome in patients with AML. We extracted hazard ratios for the cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), overall survival (OS) and leukemia free survival (LFS). A random-effect model was utilized to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: Six studies met our inclusion criteria. Our meta-analysis showed that the detection of pre-transplant MRD by NGS was associated with increased risk of cumulative incidence of relapse (hazard ratio=2.5, CI= 1.6-3.9, with p-value <0.001) and decreased overall survival (hazard ratio=1.6, CI= 1.6-2.3, p-value 0.005). LFS was significantly higher in those who had negative MRD detection by NGS before transplantation (HR=1.9, CI= 1.3-2.8 with p-value 0.001). These results were independent of the cytogenetic risk of conditioning intensity. There was heterogeneity between our studies (I2 = 53%, 52%, and 59% for CIR, OS, and LFS, respectively). Conclusions: The application of NGS to detect MRD is a strong predictor of outcome in patients with AML who are undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. NGS-detected MRD positive status prior to HSCT is indicative of a higher risk of relapse and decreased overall survival in this meta-analysis. Despite the limitations in our study, it demonstrates the value of MRD detection by NGS in HSCT recipients.

Balancing Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (aGVHD) and Survival after Peripheral Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation (SCT) in Hematological Malignancies: A Potential for Graft Engineering.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 3285-3285
Author(s):  
Ayman Saad ◽  
Mohammed Almubarak ◽  
Abraham Kanate ◽  
Aaron Cumpston ◽  
Kathy Watkins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
T Cells ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Survival Analysis ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Hematological Malignancy ◽  
P Value ◽  
Cell Dose ◽  
Cd8 Cell

Abstract Purpose: Peripheral allogeneic SCT is used to treat different types of hematologic malignancies. The target CD34 stem cell dose is 2 -5 x 106/Kg. The dose of CD3+ cells in the infusate is not taken into account except in T-depleted transplant. T-cell dose in peripheral blood stem cell collections is at least 10-fold more than that in a bone marrow harvest. Regulatory T cells (CD4+, CD25+), which comprises 5–10% of CD4 + T cells have been correlated with less incidence of aGVHD. In our study we are trying to determine the impact of T-cell dosing on the overall survival and incidence of aGVHD after peripheral allogeneic SCT in a group of patients with hematological malignancy. Methods: A retrospective study of 66 consecutive patients who underwent peripheral allogeneic SCT for hematological malignancy in our institution between January 2003 and April 2006. The median duration of follow up after SCT was 12.6 months (range 0.2–53). Duration of follow up was compromised only in a subset of patients who had early mortality following SCT. Proportional hazard model was used to define the cutoff value of CD3, CD4, and CD8 cell dose that separate 2 groups of patients with highest statistically significant difference in terms of incidence of aGVHD. Kaplan-Meier Survival Analysis was used for correlate the overall survival (calculated from date of transplant) among these groups subdivided in terms of CD3, CD4, and CD8 cell doses. Results: The 66 patients (6 females, and 60 males) with median age of 48 years (range: 19–63 years) had different malignancies; 6 ALL, 34 AML, 1 biphenotypic leukemia, 1 CLL, 11 CML, 5 Hodgkin lymphoma, 8 NHL. The SCT was from matched related donors in 39 patients, and from matched unrelated donors in 27 patients. The incidence of aGVHD (grade 2–4) was statistically significantly less among those who received CD3 dose < 33.5 × 107/kg IBW (P value: 0.04), tended to be less among those who received CD4 dose < 32.6 × 107/kg IBW (P value: 0.06), and was statistically significantly less among those who received CD8 dose < 6.2 × 107/kg IBW (P value: 0.04). Survival analysis showed no statistically significantly difference in the overall survival (OS) among all patients groups. Median OS was 10.5 months for those who received CD3 dose ≤ 33.5 ×107/kg IBW and 17 months for those who received > 33.5 ×107/kg IBW (P value: 0.35). Median OS was 12 months for those who received CD4 dose ≤ 32.6 ×107/kg IBW and 16.3 months for those who received > 32.6 ×107/kg IBW (P value: 0.8). Median OS was 6 months for those who received CD8 dose ≤ 6.2 ×107/kg IBW and 14.4 months for those who received > 6.2 ×107/kg IBW (P value: 0.13). Conclusions: In our series, CD3 dose less than 33.5 ×107/kg IBW and CD8 dose less than 6.2 ×107/kg IBW were associated with statistically significant reduced risk of grade 2–4 acute GVHD following peripheral allogeneic SCT. Overall survival was not statistically different among these groups of patients. These data suggest that, in addition to considering CD34 dose required for engraftment in allogeneic transplant, the CD3 dose and its subsets CD8 and CD4 may need to be considered to try to minimize the risk of acute GVHD without compromising survival after transplant.

Changing to a New Donor for Second Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Fanconi Anemia Seems to Improve Survival.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 2294-2294
Author(s):  
Korthof Elisabeth ◽  
Marlieke Ridder ◽  
Rosi Oneto ◽  
Andrea Bacigalupo ◽  
Johannes R Rischewski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Fanconi Anemia ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Study Population

Abstract Abstract 2294 Poster Board II-271 This retrospective analysis of the EBMT ProMISe database was designed to investigate the role of donor choice for second hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in Fanconi Anemia (FA). Our hypothesis was that using a different donor for the second HSCT would increase the probability of survival, the patient not being sensitized to donor antigens as a result of the first HSCT. We conducted a survey of the EBMT ProMISe database in order to identify FA patients transplanted more than once for bone marrow failure and retrospectively analyzed their data to determine overall survival and presence of acute GvHD. A donor for the second HSCT was defined as the “same” as for the first if both donors had identical: birth date, relation to patient (identical sibling or not), gender and family relation or donor number. A donor was “different” when this information indicated that a different person donated for second HSCT. One hundred and three patients were eligible for the study by the following criteria: diagnosis of Fanconi Anemia (confirmed by chromosome breakage test), presentation with aplastic anemia (AA) and having undergone two HSCTs between August, 1980 and December, 2007. FA patients with myelodysplasia or acute leukemia were excluded. After retracing data in the database, additional questionnaires were sent out to 44 EBMT centers that had performed second HSCTs for FA-AA, asking for supplementary data. In 80 cases (study population), enough information was collected to identify first and second donors. Forty four subjects (25 males and 19 females) received a second HSCT from the “same donor” (SD) and 36 patients (15 males and 21 females) from a “different donor” (DD). The mean age of the study population at second HSCT was 10.7 years (range, 1.8-34.5). Median interval between first and second HSCT was 63 days. At first HSCT patient gender, age at HSCT, use of cyclophosphamide and irradiation in the conditioning regimen and type of rejection were not differently distributed in the SD and DD group whereas significantly more HLA identical sibling donors were used in the SD (31%) vs. DD (11%) group (p=0.027). In 68.2% of the SD group bone marrow was used vs. in 52.7% of the DD group (p=0.002). Median cell dose in SD group was 9×106 CD34+/kg and in DD group 1.8×106 CD 34+/kg (p=0.002). At second HSCT age at HSCT, use of cyclophosphamide and irradiation in the conditioning regimen, dose of CD34+ cells and cell source were not differently distributed between SD and DD groups whereas significantly more HLA identical sibling donors were used in SD (31%) vs. DD (11%) group (p=0.027). Overall survival of all 80 patients at one year from second transplant is 36%. Probability of overall survival after 7 years is 35%. An interval between first and second HSCT of >80 days resulted in better survival (p=0.007). Overall survival at 7 years is 41% in DD and 26% in SD patients (Cox regression, HR 0.483, p=0.017). This difference remained significant after correction for the confounding effects of irradiation in first HSCT and relation donor/patient (identical sibling or not). Rejection rate after second HSCT was similar in SD and DD group (54.5%). Death occurred in 73% of SD vs. 56% of DD. Causes of death included infections (70% in SD vs. 48% in DD) and rejection (39% in SD and 38% in DD). Noteworthy more than one major cause of death was often found in the same patient. Only 2 secondary tumors were reported in the whole group. Acute GvHD gr II-IV was not significantly different in SD vs DD groups (multivariate logistic regression models, OR 1.642, p=0.47). Our data suggest that after having failed a first transplant, using the same or a different donor does not affect the occurrence of aGVHD, whereas change of donor would improve the survival of FA patients in need of a second HSCT for AA. Mechanisms underlying rejection of a first HSCT should be studied more in depth. International centers should collaborate in finding the most appropriate regimen for first and second transplants in FA. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Human Herpes Virus-6 and Clinical Manifestations After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 1960-1960
Author(s):  
Raffaella Greco ◽  
Francesca Lorentino ◽  
Daniela Clerici ◽  
Francesca Matteazzi ◽  
Alessandra Forcina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Cerebrospinal Fluid ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Viral Load ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Median Viral Load ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Allogeneic Hsct ◽  
Clinical Complications

Abstract Abstract 1960 BACKGROUND: Human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6) is increasingly recognized as an opportunistic and potentially life-threatening pathogen in recipients of allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT). Reported clinical manifestations of HHV-6 infection in transplanted patients are skin rash, interstitial pneumonia, bone marrow suppression and encephalitis. Moreover, an increasing number of clinical reports suggest that HHV-6 can facilitate the occurrence of other severe clinical complications of allogeneic HSCT, including Graft-versus-Host Disease (GvHD), ultimately increasining transplant-related mortality. Still, the actual incidence of HHV-6 infection in recipients of HSCT and the causative link between infection and clinical complications remain elusive, mostly due to the small and heterogeneous patient cohorts analyzed to date. METHODS: From January 2009 to July 2011, we retrospectively evaluated 43 consecutive adult patients (median age 51 years) who developed positivity to HHV-6 after allogeneic HSCT for high-risk hematological malignancies. Stem cell donor was for 30 patients family haploidentical, for 5 an HLA identical sibling, and for 8 an unrelated volunteer (1 of which cord blood). The viral load was determined by quantitative PCR in cell-free body fluids such as plasma, bronchoalveolar lavage, cerebrospinal fluid, bone marrow aspirates or in gastrointestinal biopsies. At the time of positivity all patients were receiving acyclovir as viral prophylaxis except 5. Sixteen patients had clinical acute GvHD at time of HHV-6 positivity (grade III-IV in 14), and 33 were profoundly immunosuppressed with variable association of 2–4 immunosuppressive drugs (steroids included). Moreover concomitant CMV positivity was detected in 11 patients, while a severe neutropenia in 12. RESULTS: Median time from allogeneic HSCT to HHV-6 reactivation was 36 days (range: 7–625). In 19 patients HHV-6 was detected in plasma, with a median viral load of 19,454 cp/mL (34-4,524,600); 15 had concomitant fever, 5 skin rash of new onset, 4 impaired liver function, and 5 developed cytopenia subsequently to the infection. In 7 patients HHV-6 was detected in the bone marrow: the median viral load was 163'800 cp/mL (568-1'552'982). In 8 patients, all febrile, HHV-6 was observed in bronchoalveolar lavage samples with a median of 4'149 cp/mL (85–39250). In 16 patients, 10 with documented gut aGvHD, 11 with diarrhoea, HHV-6 was detected in gastrointestinal biopsies with a median of 7'510 cp/mL (120-4'524'600). HHV-6 was found in cerebrospinal fluid in 4 cases (all within 30 days after HSCT); the median viral load was 29'352 cp/mL (4'508-1'552'982); all these patients experienced encephalitis with confusion and anxiety, 2 suffered seizures and 3 showed abnormal findings on brain MRI. Amongst patients with organ localizations of HHV-6 only 28% had concomitant plasma positivity. HHV-6 positivity led to antiviral pharmacological treatment only when associated with clinical manifestations (n=21), using as first choice therapy foscarnet. Amongst the total 43 patients with documented HHV-6 positivity 11 completely solved the clinical event, whereas 19 (44%) died. CONCLUSIONS: HHV-6 infection/reactivation is associated with high morbidity and mortality in patients who undergo allogeneic HSCT. HHV-6 infection typically occurred close to the time of neutrophil engraftment. HSCT from an HLA-mismatched donor and steroid administration were associated with increased risk of active HHV-6 infection. Development of encephalitis was associated with high HHV-6 viral load. The regular monitoring of HHV-6 DNA in allogeneic HSCT recipients, using a real-time PCR assay, may be useful for identifying active HHV-6 infection and for the introduction of a pre-emptive treatment, possibly reducing the incidence of the most severe clinical complications. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Combining Proteomics and Gene Expression Profiling Identifies Proteins/Genes Associated with Short Overall Survival in Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 197-197
Author(s):  
Ricky D Edmondson ◽  
Shweta S. Chavan ◽  
Christoph Heuck ◽  
Bart Barlogie
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Multivariate Analyses ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
P Value ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Training Set ◽  
Test Set ◽  
Log Rank Test ◽  
Test Sets

Abstract Abstract 197 We and others have used gene expression profiling to classify multiple myeloma into high and low risk groups; here, we report the first combined GEP and proteomics study of a large number of baseline samples (n=85) of highly enriched tumor cells from patients with newly diagnosed myeloma. Peptide expression levels from MS data on CD138-selected plasma cells from a discovery set of 85 patients with newly diagnosed myeloma were used to identify proteins that were linked to short survival (OS < 3 years vs OS ≥ 3 years). The proteomics dataset consisted of intensity values for 11,006 peptides (representing 2,155 proteins), where intensity is the quantitative measure of peptide abundance; Peptide intensities were normalized by Z score transformation and significance analysis of microarray (SAM) was applied resulting in the identification 24 peptides as differentially expressed between the two groups (OS < 3 years vs OS ≥ 3 years), with fold change ≥1.5 and FDR <5%. The 24 peptides mapped to 19 unique proteins, and all were present at higher levels in the group with shorter overall survival than in the group with longer overall survival. An independent SAM analysis with parameters identical to the proteomics analysis (fold change ≥1.5; FDR <5%) was performed with the Affymetrix U133Plus2 microarray chip based expression data. This analysis identified 151 probe sets that were differentially expressed between the two groups; 144 probe sets were present at higher levels and seven at lower levels in the group with shorter overall survival. Comparing the SAM analyses of proteomics and GEP data, we identified nine probe sets, corresponding to seven genes, with increased levels of both protein and mRNA in the short lived group. In order to validate these findings from the discovery experiment we used GEP data from a randomized subset of the TT3 patient population as a training set for determining the optimal cut-points for each of the nine probe sets. Thus, TT3 population was randomized into two sub-populations for the training set (two-thirds of the population; n=294) and test set (one-third of the population; n=147); the Total Therapy 2 (TT2) patient population was used as an additional test set (n=441). A running log rank test was performed on the training set for each of the nine probe sets to determine its optimal gene expression cut-point. The cut-points derived from the training set were then applied to TT3 and TT2 test sets to investigate survival differences for the groups separated by the optimal cutpoint for each probe. The overall survival of the groups was visualized using the method of Kaplan and Meier, and a P-value was calculated (based on log-rank test) to determine whether there was a statistically significant difference in survival between the two groups (P ≤0.05). We performed univariate regression analysis using Cox proportional hazard model with the nine probe sets as variables on the TT3 test set. To identify which of the genes corresponding to these nine probes had an independent prognostic value, we performed a multivariate stepwise Cox regression analysis. wherein CACYBP, FABP5, and IQGAP2 retained significance after competing with the remaining probe sets in the analysis. CACYBP had the highest hazard ratio (HR 2.70, P-value 0.01). We then performed the univariate and multivariate analyses on the TT2 test set where CACYBP, CORO1A, ENO1, and STMN1 were selected by the multivariate analysis, and CACYBP had the highest hazard ratio (HR 1.93, P-value 0.004). CACYBP was the only gene selected by multivariate analyses of both test sets. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Graft-Versus-Host Disease Following Myeloablative Busulfan Plus Fludarabine and Busulfan Plus Cyclophosphamide For Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation In Acute Myeloid Leukemia In First Complete Remission

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 3290-3290
Author(s):  
Qifa Liu ◽  
Hui Liu ◽  
Daihong Liu ◽  
Yongrong Lai ◽  
Jing Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Graft Versus Host ◽  
Tnf Α ◽  
Before And After ◽  
First Complete Remission

Abstract Background Results from single institutions had shown that compared with busulfan plus cyclophosphamide (BuCy) conditioning, limiting tissue damage by myeloablative busulfan plus fludarabine (BuFlu) conditioning might decrease cytokines release, leading a lower incidence of the graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). In our prospective, multicenter and parallel-group study, further comparison was made of the incidences and severities of GVHD following BuCy and BuFlu myeloablative conditioning regimens in patients undergoing allo-HSCT for AML in first complete remission (CR1), and analyzed plasma cytokines before and after the conditioning. Methods A total of 148 patients with AML-CR1 undergoing allo-HSCT were enrolled into BuCy (busulfan1.6mg/kg, iv q12 hours, -7 ∼ -4d; cyclophosphamide 60 mg/kg.d, -3 ∼ -2d) or BuFlu (busulfan 1.6 mg/kg, iv q12 hours, -5 ∼ -2d; fludarabine 30 mg/m2.d, -6 ∼ -2d) group between January 2007 and January 2013. For patients enrolled between January 2012 and January 2013, plasma concentrations of IL-6, IL-1β, TNF-α, CXCL-10 and IL-17A before and after conditioning were measured by Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and compared between the two groups. Regimen-related toxicity (RRT), incidences and severities of acute and chronic GVHD, and overall survival were compared between the two groups. Results Of the 148 patients enrolled in the study, the data of 142 cases were used to determine the endpoints in the intent-to-treat population (72 in BuFlu group and 76 in BuCy group). The levels of TNF-α and IL-6 were significantly higher after the conditioning (5.60±4.40 vs 8.94±5.50 and 2.19±1.24 vs 6.06±12.16 pg/ml, P <0.001 and P =0.045 ), however, there were no significant differences on these cytokines between the two groups. The levels of CXCL-10 in BuCy group was significantly higher than that in BuFlu group (P =0.012). The incidence of I-II° and III-IV° acute GVHD were 42.1% and 6.8%, and 36.1% and 5.7%, respectively, in BuCy and BuFlu group (P=0.363 and P=0.770, respectively). Chronic GVHD occurred in 29 of 69 (41.7%) and 30 of 72 (41.7%) patients, respectively, in BuCy and BuFlu group (P= 1.000). And the incidence of extensive chronic GVHD were 14.3% and 16.7%, respectively, in BuCy and BuFlu group (P= 0.670). The median follow up duration was 824 (range, 3–2345) days. The 5 year overall survival were 79.2 ± 4.4% and 78.6 ± 76.1% (P= 0.555), respectively in BuCy and BuFlu group Conclusion In this report, the incidences and severities of acute GVHD as well as chronic GVHD were similar between BuFlu and BuCy regimen in AML-CR1 patients undergoing allo-HSCT. Disclosures: Liu: National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.81000231, No.81270647) and Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou of China (11A72121174).: Research Funding; It was supported by 863 Program (No. 2011AA020105), National Public Health Grand Research Foundation (Grant No. 201202017): Research Funding.

High-Dose Cyclophosphamide + G-CSF Mobilization Regimen Have Higher Anti-Myeloma Effects Than G-CSF Alone Regimen – Single Institutional Study in 147 Myeloma Patients From Japan

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 2007-2007
Author(s):  
Akira Tanimura ◽  
Masataka Takeshita ◽  
Atsushi Sato ◽  
Junichiro Takano ◽  
Hideaki Kitahara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Control ◽  
Therapeutic Intervention ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Alkylating Agents ◽  
Staging System ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
P Value ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Log Rank Test

Abstract Abstract 2007 Background: High-dose cyclophosphamide (HD-CY) + granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and G-CSF alone have been used to mobilize hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) for autologous SC transplantation (ASCT) in multiple myeloma (MM). However, which regimen is better is unknown; anti-myeloma effects of HD-CY + G-CSF have not been established. From January 1999 to June 2009, we administered HD-CY+G-CSF but changed to G-CSF alone during July 2009–December 2010. We retrospectively assessed HSC collection efficacy, complications, and anti-myeloma effects of these regimens. Patients and methods: We analyzed 147 MM patients from whom HSCs were to be collected at our institute. For mobilization, 115 patients were administered HD-CY (4 g/m2)+G-CSF (600 mg/body filgrastim or 500 mg/body lenograstim) and 32 were administered G-CSF alone (same dose as HD-CY). Here, 17 patients received therapeutic intervention between mobilization and transplantation without disease progression (PD). To avoid the patient outcome effect, we defined event- and progression-free survivals (EFS and PFS). EFS was defined as PD, death, or therapeutic intervention without PD. PFS was defined as PD or death, where therapeutic intervention without PD was used as a censor. Both were calculated from the start of mobilization. For analyzing response by mobilization, patients receiving therapeutic intervention without PD were excluded. Response was evaluated in those not receiving therapeutic intervention without PD or in whom response could not be evaluated before ASCT. Thalidomide was administered as maintenance therapy to 14 and 6 patients in the HD-CY+G-CSF and G-CSF groups after ASCT. Thalidomide administration was used as a censor. Results: Vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (VAD) and HD dexamethasone (HDD) therapies were administered as induction therapy (VAD for 117, HDD for 2, and both for 11). New (bortezomib or thalidomide) and alkylating agents were administered to 7 and 13 patients, respectively. Before mobilization, 26 patients received radiotherapy; none were administered lenalidomide. No statistical difference was seen in baseline characteristics (Durie-Salmon stage, International staging system, interval from diagnosis to mobilization, disease control, and previous therapies) between both groups. However, patients mobilized by G-CSF alone were significantly older. Among 147 patients, 121 underwent planned ASCT. Of the 17 receiving therapeutic intervention without PD, 13 and 4 belonged to the HD-CY+G-CSF and G-CSF groups, respectively. More than 2 × 106 CD34-positive cells/kg were collected from 93% and 75% patients in the HD-CY+G-CSF and G-CSF (p = 0.0079) groups, respectively. More than 4 × 106 CD34-positive cells/kg were collected from 84% and 69% in the HD-CY+G-CSF and G-CSF (p = 0.07). Mean HSC count was 11.4 × 106/kg in the HD-CY+G-CSF group and 4.5 × 106/kg in the G-CSF group (p = 0.0007). Among patients receiving HD-CY+G-CSF, 66% were treated with intravenous antibiotics; 3 suffered cardiac shock and 2 septic shock. However, among those receiving G-CSF alone, no severe complications were seen. Median hospitalization days were 21 and 8 for the HD-CY+G-CSF and G-CSF groups, respectively (p < 0.0001). In the HD-CY+G-CSF group, 16% improved in disease control before ASCT, 71% showed no change, and 13% progressed. However, no patient improved, 63% showed no change, and 27% progressed in the G-CSF group (p = 0.015). Median EFS was 25 months in the HD-CY+G-CSF group and 13 in the G-CSF group (fig 1, p value of log-rank test = 0.012). Median PFS was 28 months in the HD-CY+G-CSF group and 15 in the G-CSF group (fig 2, p value of log-rank test = 0.011). Median overall survival did not differ significantly. Conclusion: Regarding the safety and duration of hospitalization, G-CSF alone may be safer and beneficial. However, HD-CY+G-CSF was more effective as a mobilization regimen and showed higher anti-myeloma effects than G-CSF alone. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document