Ixazomib, Dexamethasone and Rituximab in Previously Untreated Patients with Waldenström Macroglobulinemia

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 2956-2956 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge J. Castillo ◽  
Joshua Gustine ◽  
Kirsten Meid ◽  
Toni Dubeau ◽  
Guang Yang ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM) is an incurable B-cell lymphoma characterized by the accumulation of IgM-secreting lymphoplasmacytic cells in the bone marrow and other organs. Bortezomib in combination with rituximab and dexamethasone (BDR) is highly active as primary therapy in WM, though treatment-related neuropathy is common with BDR in WM, and often leads to premature treatment discontinuation. Ixazomib is an orally administered proteasome inhibitor with limited neuropathy that is active in myeloma, but has not been previously evaluated in WM Methods: Symptomatic, previously untreated patients with a clinicopathological diagnosis of WM were included in this prospective, single-arm phase II study evaluating ixazomib 4 mg PO on days 1, 8 and 15 + dexamethasone 20 mg PO/IV on days 1, 8 and 15 + rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV on day 1 (IDR) were administered for six 4-week cycles (induction) followed by six 8-week cycles (maintenance). Rituximab was held for the first two cycles of therapy to minimize risk of IgM flare. Zoster prophylaxis and proton pump inhibitors were administered throughout IDR therapy. The study was approved by the institutional review board at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and registered under Clinicaltrials.gov ID NCT02400437. Results: Twenty-six WM patients were enrolled and were exposed to IDR therapy. The median age at WM diagnosis was 63 years (range 46-81 years) and the median age at initiation of therapy was 65 years (range 46-82 years). Baseline median hemoglobin was 10.2 g/dl (range 6.9-13.2 g/dL), median serum IgM level was 5,068 mg/dl (range 653-7,650 mg/dL), 46% of patients had lymphadenopathy and 12% had splenomegaly. The median bone marrow involvement was 55% (range 5-95%). The MYD88 L265P gene mutation was identified in all cases. CXCR4 gene mutations were identified in 15 patients (58%), of whom 10 (67%) had nonsense, and 5 (33%) frameshift mutations. Sixteen patients have completed the induction phase of therapy at this time. Following induction therapy, the median serum IgM level decreased to 2,316 mg/dl (range 287-5,820 mg/dL), median hemoglobin increased to 13.1 mg/dl (range 10.4-14.6 g/dL), and median bone marrow involvement decreased to 23% (range 0-76%). P-value <0.001 for all comparisons against baseline. Using consensus response criteria, the overall response rate was 88% (VGPR 6%, PR 44%, MR 38%) with a major response rate of 50%. Major responses (VGPR + PR) were observed in 47% of patients with CXCR4 mutations versus 64% in those who were wild-type CXCR4 (p=0.32). The median time to response was 8 weeks. The median time to response in CXCR4 mutant patients was 12 weeks versus 8 weeks in wild-type CXCR4 patients (log-rank p=0.03). Four patients have been taken off study; 2 for lack of response, 1 due to lack of clinical benefit with persistent failure to thrive while in PR, and 1 for progressive neuropathy while in PR although in part due to worsening of diabetic neuropathy. No other grade 3 or 4 adverse events were reported. Conclusion: These preliminary data suggest that the combination of IDR is an active and well-tolerated, neuropathy-sparing regimen in symptomatic untreated WM patients. Disclosures Castillo: Biogen: Consultancy; Otsuka: Consultancy; Abbvie: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria; Millennium: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria.

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2887-2887
Author(s):  
Jorge J. Castillo ◽  
Joshua Gustine ◽  
Toni Dubeau ◽  
Kirsten Meid ◽  
Andrew Keezer ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Rituximab-containing regimens are commonly used for primary therapy in patients with symptomatic Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia (WM), and response is defined by decrease in serum IgM levels. In previous studies, we and others observed that in certain WM patients completing rituximab-based primary therapy, serum IgM levels continued to decline following completion of therapy, deepening the response to therapy. To further clarify the frequency and clinical characteristics, we evaluated a large population of treatment naïve patients treated at our WM center with rituximab-containing regimens. Methods: Patients with a clinicopathological diagnosis of WM requiring therapy based on criteria from the 2ndInternational Workshop for WM (IWWM) who received a rituximab-containing regimen as primary therapy in the WM center at our institution from 2005 to 2016 were included. Responses were defined per criteria from the 6thIWWM. Findings were stratified based on patients having received, or not, maintenance therapy after induction therapy. We gathered pertinent clinical data, including responses at the end of induction, at the end of maintenance, and at the lowest serum IgM level after completion of induction and/or maintenance. Response deepening was defined as 25% decrease in serum IgM at any point after completion of therapy. Results: 179 patients met eligibility criteria for this study. Induction therapy consisted of bortezomib, dexamethasone and rituximab (BDR) (N=86; 48%); bendamustine and rituximab (Benda-R) (N=57; 32%); cyclophosphamide, dexamethasone and rituximab (CDR) (N=36; 20%). 117 (65%) patients received maintenance therapy. There were no differences in baseline characteristics for age, gender, serum IgM, hemoglobin level, bone marrow involvement, hemoglobin, platelet count, beta-2-microglobulin level, MYD88 and CXCR4 mutation status, time to therapy, regimen, and receipt of maintenance therapy vs. observation status. At baseline, median serum IgM levels for patients who received maintenance was 4,445 mg/dl (range 289-8,100 mg/dl) and for those who were observed was 4,400 mg/dl (range 155-10,020 mg/dl) (p=0.37). Following induction therapy, median serum IgM levels declined to 969 mg/dl (range 33-5,940 mg/dl) and 1,366 mg/dl (114-7,108 mg/dl) for patients who subsequently received maintenance or were observed (p<0.001 for each group versus baseline; p=0.11 for serum IgM comparisons post-induction between groups). Following maintenance, median serum IgM level declined to 528 mg/dl (range 10-5,410 mg/dl; p<0.001 compared to end of induction). Further declines in serum IgM post-maintenance occurred, with best post-maintenance serum IgM level of 384 mg/dl (range 9-4,759 mg/dl; p<0.001 compared with end of maintenance, with 72/117 (62%) patients experiencing a lower serum IgM level and 44/117 (38%) having at least a 25% decrease in serum IgM levels. Median time from end of maintenance to lowest IgM level was 1.6 years (0.1-7.9 years). For patients observed after induction therapy, the median best serum IgM level was 1,253 mg/dl (11-7,108 mg/dl; p=0.01 compared to end of induction), with 29/62 (47%) patients having a lower serum IgM level than at completion of induction, and 18/62 (29%) had at least a 25% decrease in serum IgM level. Median time from end of induction to lowest IgM level for those observed was 1.6 years (0.2-5.1 years). Categorical responses are shown in Figure. Importantly, when analyzing all patients, hemoglobin level <11.5 g/dl (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.23-0.88; p=0.02), bone marrow involvement ≥50% (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.26-0.93; p=0.03), presence of CXCR4 mutations (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.13-0.87; p=0.03) and serum IgM level ≥4,000 mg/dl (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.29-0.99; p=0.04) were associated with lower odds of response deepening after completing therapy. Conclusion: A third of WM patients who receive primary therapy with rituximab-containing regimens experienced deepening of response following completion of therapy, with a median time to best response of 1.6 years. High serum IgM levels and bone marrow burden, low hemoglobin levels, and presence of CXCR4 mutations at primary therapy initiation were associated with lower odds of response deepening. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Castillo: Genentech: Consultancy; Beigene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Research Funding. Hunter:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy. Treon:Janssen: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; BMS: Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 5014-5014
Author(s):  
Barbara Botto ◽  
Marilena Bellò ◽  
Annalisa Chiappella ◽  
Roberto Passera ◽  
Giulia Benevolo ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: The addition of antibody monoclonal anti CD20 Rituximab to CHOP chemotherapy resulted in improved CR, progression free survival and overall survival rates for patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). RIT with Zevalin, as single agent, has been shown to be effective in the treatment of relapsed refractory elderly DLBCL, namely in Rituximab naïve patients. However, in patients pretreated with Rituximab the reported response rate was lower. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Zevalin in a group of patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive lymphoma, all heavily pretreated with Rituximab containing regimens. Patients and methods: Inclusion criteria were as follows: age over 18 yrs; relapsed or refractory CD20+ aggressive lymphoma (follicular grade IIIb, PML or DLBCL); WHO performance status of 0 to 2; stage II bulky, III or IV; bone marrow involvement &lt;25 %; written informed consent approved in accordance with institutional guidelines. All patients were previously treated with ≥ 2 lines of Rituximab containing regimens. Patients with pre-treatment platelet counts of &gt; 150 × 109/l received Zevalin at 0.4 mCi/kg whereas those with platelets &lt; 150 109/l received 0.3 mCi/kg. Results: 24 patients were treated with RIT. Five patients had stage II, and 19 stage III/IV; bone marrow involvement was present in 11/24. Nine patients had grade IIIb follicular, 14 DLBCL and one mantle cell lymphoma. Eighteen patients received 0.4 mCi/kg and six patients 0.3 mCi/kg. Eleven patients were treated with RIT alone, six received RIT after standard salvage chemoimmunotherapy and seven were treated with RIT in combination with BEAM and subsequent autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Status of disease before Zevalin treatment was: progressive disease (PD) in 14; complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) after salvage chemoimmunotherapy in 4 and 6 patients respectively. All patients in CR before RIT (4/24) maintained a continous CR after treatment. Overall response rate (ORR) after RIT for patients not in CR (20/24) was: 4 patients (20%) achieved a CR, 7 patients (35%) a PR and 9 patients experienced no response/progression (ORR 11/20 patients 55%). Six of seven patients treated with RIT + BEAM + ASCT achieved a response (CR 4 patients and PR 2 patients), one patient progressed immediately after the end of program. ORR in 11 patients treated with RIT alone and in six patients treated with chemotherapy + RIT were 46% and 50% respectively. With a median follow up of 32 months, OS and PFS rates were 67% and 52%. Eight patients died, all because of lymphoma. The most common grade 3–4 adverse events were neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Discussion: the results of this study suggest that RIT with 90Y-Ibritumomab Tiuxetan is a safe and effective treatment for patients with relapsed/refractory aggressive lymphoma even if they were pretreated with Rituximab containing chemotherapy.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2866-2866
Author(s):  
Katarina Luptakova ◽  
Michelle Kim ◽  
Pamela Ely ◽  
Barbara Grant ◽  
John Anthony Parker ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2866 Introduction: Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common lymphoid malignancy and is generally responsive to anthracycline-containing chemotherapy. However, 60% of patients (pts) will relapse after their first line treatment. At the time of relapse the only curative approach includes the use of a stem cell transplant (SCT). The incidence of DLBCL increases with age which creates a subset of pts who are not candidates for first line anthracycline-based chemotherapy, and a large subset of pts who are not candidates for SCT due to advanced age and/or co-morbidities. Thus, there is a significant unmet need for therapies with a low toxicity profile in elderly or medically unfit pts with DLBCL. 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan (90Y-IT) is an anti-CD20 murine antibody linked with a beta-emitting isotope approved for use in indolent lymphoma. Maintenance rituximab (R) has been reported to increase response rates and prolong remission duration in some lymphomas. We performed a phase II multicenter clinical trial to examine the efficacy of 90Y-IT induction followed by maintenance R in pts with DLBCL. Patients and Methods: Eligible pts were either intolerant of anthracycline-based chemotherapy or had relapsed or refractory CD20+ DLBCL with measurable disease. Pts had to be ineligible for SCT for reasons other than failure to harvest stem cells. Bone marrow involvement by lymphoma of less than 25% based on bilateral bone marrow aspirate and biopsy was required. R 250 mg/m2 was administered IV immediately followed by 111In-ibritumomab tiuxetan. Nuclear scans were performed at 24 and 48 hours to insure there was no altered biodistribution. On day 8 a second infusion of R 250 mg/m2 followed by 0.4 mCi/kg (for pts with a baseline platelet count >150,000/mm3) or 0.3 mCi/kg 90Y-IT (for pts with a baseline platelet count 100,000-149,000/mm3) was given. Pts with multiple extranodal sites or prior bone marrow involvement received CNS prophylaxis with intrathecal methotrexate or cytarabine. Maintenance R 375 mg/m2 was given on weeks 3–6, then weekly × 4 every 6 months × 4 cycles or until progression. Results: Between 10/2003 and 9/2009, 25 pts have been treated. During the course of the study, the ownership of the therapeutic agent changed three times and therefore enrollment was interrupted on two occasions. The median age of pts was 79 (range 45–91), 36% pts had a sIPI score 3 or more. The median number of prior regimens is 2 [0-5]. The 90Y-IT treatment regimen produced an overall response rate of 36% [9 pts] with 28% CR [7 pts]. To date, the mean OS is 18 months (median 8.1 months) with a median follow-up of 11.2 months. Among responding pts, the median OS has not been reached with a median follow-up of over 26.2 [0.1-71.4] months. Thirteen pts died within the first year, 6 patients (24%) continue to be in remission greater than 18 months, and 4 patients (16%) remain in long-term remission [39.9-71.4 months]. The most frequently observed toxicity was hematologic. Eleven percent of pts had grade 4 neutropenia with only one patient experiencing febrile neutropenia, and 16% of pts experienced grade 4 thrombocytopenia. There were no unexpected non-hematologic toxicities except for 1 patient that experienced extravasation. One late-occurring case of MDS/AML was reported that is possibly related to the study regimen, and one case of adenocarcinoma of the GI tract that is likely unrelated. Of note, none of the pts that progressed on the chemotherapy preceding this study achieved a response to the study regimen. Conclusions: The 90Y-IT treatment regimen has an acceptable toxicity profile in elderly or heavily pretreated pts with DLBCL. The two week outpatient 90Y-IT infusion produces response rates and durations similar to that of more prolonged cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens. Progression on previous chemotherapy predicts for poor response to 90Y-IT. Treatment with 90Y-IT can provide durable remission to a select subset of pts who are not candidates for SCT, or intensive anthracycline based chemotherapy. Disclosures: Off Label Use: We are describing a phase II study of the use of 90Y-Ibritumomab Tiuxetan for treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Current FDA approved use of 90Y-Ibritumomab Tiuxetan includes relapsed or refractory, low-grade or follicular B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) or previously untreated follicular NHL who achieve a partial or complete response to first-line chemotherapy. Joyce:Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding; Cell Therapeutics Inc: Research Funding; Biogen Idec: Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 5627-5627
Author(s):  
Yesid Alvarado ◽  
Michael J Keating ◽  
Susan O'Brien ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
William G. Wierda ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: There is evidence of a leukemogenic effect of purine analogues, mainly when combined with DNA-damaging agents. Various series report an approximately 5% rate of t-MDS/AML in patients treated with a fludarabine-based regimen. Patients are generally old, and old age is associated with worse outcomes. To date, there is no established standard therapy recommendation for this group of patients, and results of prospective treatment evaluations are scarce. Aim: To determine the characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with CLL and t-MDS/AML. Methods: We analyzed a group of 6 patients with newly diagnosed t-MDS/AML who were treated in our institution from September 2011 to July 2014. Patients were enrolled in a phase II trial of azacitidine (75 mg/m2 IV daily x 5 days) in combination with vorinostat (200 mg orally three times daily x 5 days) (Arm A) or azacitidine alone (Arm B), with courses repeated every 3-8 weeks. This trial was designed to uniformly treat patients not eligible for other leukemia protocols due to comorbidities. Results: At baseline, all patients had an underlying diagnosis of CLL that was in remission or minimally active. The median percentage of CLL bone marrow involvement was 10% (range 0-60%), and ALC was 0.9 K/uL (range 0.2-9.79). The median number of prior CLL treatments was 2 (range 0-3). All patients had previously received fludarabine-based regimens. The median time from chemotherapy to t-MDS/AML diagnosis was 10 years (range 4-10). All patients were male, and the median age was 72 years (range 52-72). All patients had 3-line cytopenia, with median WBC 2.3 K/uL (range 0.8-8.9), ANC 0.55 K/uL (range 0-1.22), hemoglobin 9.6 G/DL (range 8.3-10.4), platelets 39 K/uL (range 6-80), and bone marrow blast percentage of 5% (range 1-18%). The karyotype was complex in all patients. Molecular studies showed that 3 patients had TP53 gene mutations. Five patients received treatment in Arm A, and only 1 patient was randomized to Arm B. Patients received a median of 4 cycles (range 2-7) and remained in the study for a median time of 216 days (range 86-329) before progression. None of the patients achieved remission, but stable disease was observed in 5 out of 6 patients. At the time of this analysis, 4 patients are dead and 2 are still alive: one discontinued treatment because of prolonged myelosuppression and is receiving best supportive care, and the other is recovering from cycle number 4 of treatment. The median survival in the group from the time of treatment initiation was 10.1 months and from the time of study discontinuation was 3.1 months. Further therapy was attempted in 3 patients without response. Conclusion: This is a group of patients with poor prognostic features. Azacytidine and vorinostat have been previously reported to be a safe combination (Garcia-Manero et al. ASH 2010, abstract 604) and may constitute a reasonable treatment alternative. Further prospective studies involving larger numbers of patients are required. Abstract 5627. Table 1: Baseline Patient Characteristics. Patient Age WBC K/uL Hb G/DL Plt K/uL BM Blast % CLL BM % Cytogenetic Molecular Prior CLL Treatments Treatment Arm Best Response 1 52 11 9.6 6 18 60 -3,-4,-5q,-6,-7, -7p,-12, +16 TP53 mutation 1.FCR x 62. Rituximab + Lenalidomide A NR 2 74 1 10 41 3 10 -3p,-5q,-7,-15,-17,-19 TP53 mutation 1. FCR x 42. FCR x 53. BR x 2 A SD 3 68 2.2 9.4 27 6 30 +7,-7p,t(7,21) Negative 1. FCR x 62. FCR x 4 B SD 4 73 2.3 9.7 39 6 0 +2,-5q,+8,-17,-18,+19,+20,-Y Negative 1. FCR x 6 A SD 5 71 0.8 8.3 39 4 0 +2,+4,t(5;17),+6,-7,-9, +13, +15,-16,-17,+18,+19,-20,+21 Negative 1. FR x 12. BR x43. MEDI-551 A SD 6 74 2.4 10.4 80 1 10 t(1;3),inv3,-5q,-18 TP53 mutation 1. R-CHOP x 62. BR x 13. FCR x 4 A SD WBC: White blood cells, Hb: hemoglobin, Plt: Platelets, BM: Bone Marrow, CLL: Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, F: Fludarabine, C: Cyclophosphamide, R: Rituximab, B: Bendamustine, MEDI-551: anti-CD19 antibody, NR: no response, SD: stable disease. Disclosures O'Brien: Amgen, Celgene, GSK: Consultancy; CLL Global Research Foundation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Emergent, Genentech, Gilead, Infinity, Pharmacyclics, Spectrum: Consultancy, Research Funding; MorphoSys, Acerta, TG Therapeutics: Research Funding. Kantarjian:ARIAD, Pfizer, Amgen: Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 2979-2979 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carla Casulo ◽  
Juan-Manuel Sancho ◽  
Koen Van Eygen ◽  
Sven de Vos ◽  
Santiago Mercadal ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Duvelisib is an oral, dual inhibitor of PI3K-d,γ, in development for the treatment of hematologic malignancies, including follicular lymphoma (FL). Duvelisib disrupts PI3K-d,γ-mediated signaling within tumor cells and their interactions with the tumor microenvironment, hindering hematologic tumor cell survival. Data from a Phase 1 study of duvelisib indicate the potential for duvelisib to be an effective treatment for FL, with an acceptable safety profile. CONTEMPO (NCT02391545), is designed to evaluate the safety and clinical activity of duvelisib in combination with rituximab (DR) or obinutuzumab (DO) in patients (pts) with previously-untreated CD20+ FL. Methods: In CONTEMPO, duvelisib is administered at 25 mg BID continuously in 28-day treatment cycles, combined either with rituximab (375 mg/m2 for 4 weekly doses, then 1 dose every 2 cycles) or obinutuzumab (1000 mg for 4 weekly doses, then 1 dose every 2 cycles). Pts are assigned 1:1 into the two parallel treatment arms. Key inclusion criteria include: diagnosis of previously-untreated CD20+ FL, Stage II with bulky disease (≥ 7 cm lesion), or Stage III-IV disease, at least 1 measurable disease lesion > 1.5 cm, adequate liver and renal function, and no clinical evidence of transformation to a more aggressive subtype of lymphoma or Grade 3B FL. Prophylaxis for herpes (HSV/VZV) is recommended. For pts with a history of CMV infection requiring treatment, prophylaxis and monitoring of reactivation is recommended. The original protocol mandated PJP prophylaxis when CD4 counts were ≤ 200 cells/mm3, and was subsequently amended to include all pts. Disease response assessments (CT scans and physical exams) occur on Day 1 of Cycle 4 (C4), C8, C12, C16, C20, and C26. Results: As of 19 July 2016 (data cut-off), 28 pts received DR and 27 received DO. For DR pts, the median age was 58 years, most were male (64%), 21% had Gr 1 and 64% Gr 2 disease at baseline, and 54% had bone marrow involvement. Median time from diagnosis was 2.3 months. For DO pts, the median age was 58 years, most were female (59%), 48% had Gr 1 and 30% Gr 2 disease at baseline, and 59% had bone marrow involvement. Median time from diagnosis was 2.6 months. DR pts were on treatment for a median of 3.9 months, DO pts for 4.5 months. The overall response rate (ORR) per IWG criteria for DR was 87% and for DO was 91% (see table) The rate of AEs for DR pts was 93%, with 50% having a ≥ Gr 3 AE. 64% of DR pts had an AE leading to duvelisib dose modification (reduction or hold), while 14% discontinued duvelisib due to an AE. The most common ≥ Gr 3 AEs on DR (> 2 pts) were ALT increased (21%) and rash (14%). The rate of ≥ Gr 3 infections was 11%, including PJP (n=2; no prophylaxis, pre-amendment), followed by lung infection and pneumococcal pneumonia (1 pt, each). One PJP case resolved and the pt continued on study. The second PJP case resolved, however the pt had a subsequent fatal event of acute respiratory distress, the only fatal AE on study. The rate of AEs for DO pts was 89%, with 70% of pts having a ≥ Gr 3 AE. 63% of DO pts had an AE leading to duvelisib dose modification (reduction or hold), while 7% discontinued duvelisib due to an AE. Most common ≥ Gr 3 AEs (> 2pts) on DO were neutropenia (19%), ALT increased (15%), and AST increased (11%). The rate of ≥ Gr 3 infections was 15%, including conjunctivitis, RSV pneumonia, pyelonephritis, and septic shock (1 pt, each). No pts on DO died due to an AE. Conclusions: Preliminary clinical activity with DR (87% ORR, 22% CR) and DO (91% ORR, 18% CR) supports the potential role of duvelisib in combination with an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody as initial treatment for pts with FL. The safety profile was manageable with appropriate risk mitigation measures, suggesting further investigation of these combinations may be warranted. Disclosures Casulo: Celgene: Research Funding; Infinity: Consultancy, Honoraria. Sancho:Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celltrion, Inc: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Gyan:Amgen: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Pierre Fabre: Honoraria; Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Fresenius Kabi: Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Mundipharma: Consultancy; Roche: Research Funding. Steelman:Infinity: Employment. Pearlberg:Infinity: Employment. Goy:Genentech: Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Acerta: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; infinity: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Writing support, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 4487-4487 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven P Treon ◽  
Kirsten Meid ◽  
Christina K. Tripsas ◽  
Leonard T. Heffner ◽  
Herbert Eradat ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose: Everolimus inhibits mTOR, a component of PI3K/AKT pro-survival signaling triggered by MYD88 and CXCR4 activating mutations in Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia (WM). Experimental design: We evaluated everolimus in a prospective, multicenter study of 33 symptomatic, previously untreated WM patients. Intended therapy consisted of everolimus (10 mg/day) until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Dose de-escalation was permitted. The study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov(NCT01470196). Results: At best response, median serum IgM levels declined from 4,440 to 1,360 mg/dL (p<0.0001); median hemoglobin rose from 10.8 to 12 g/dL (p=0.001); and median bone marrow disease burden declined from 75% to 52.5% in serially biopsied patients. The ORR and major response rates were 72.7% and 60.6%, respectively. Among genotyped patients, non-responders associated with wild-type MYD88 and mutated CXCR4 status. Median time to response was 4 weeks. Discordance between serum IgM levels and BM disease burden was common. With a median follow-up of 13.1 (range 1.6-64.6 months), median time to progression was 21 months, and 33 months for major responders. Discontinuation of everolimus led to rapid serum IgM rebound in 7 patients, and symptomatic hyperviscosity in two patients. Toxicity led to treatment discontinuation in 27% of patients, including 18% for pneumonitis. Conclusions: Everolimus is active as primary therapy in WM. IgM discordance is common, and treatment cessation can often lead to rapid serum IgM rebound. Pneumonitis also appears more pronounced in untreated versus previously treated WM patients. The risks and benefits of everolimus should carefully be weighed against other primary WM therapy options. Disclosures Treon: Janssen: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Heffner:Celgene: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Eradat:AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria. Castillo:Millennium: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Otsuka: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria; Biogen: Consultancy; Abbvie: Research Funding. Ghobrial:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Noxxon: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria.


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 5230-5230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Hicks ◽  
R. Buckstein ◽  
E. Piliotis ◽  
J. Mangel ◽  
K. Imrie ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive B-cell lymphoma have a poor prognosis. If sensitive to salvage chemotherapy, high dose therapy followed by autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) can result in long-term survival for some. Unfortunately, 50% of patients are insensitive to standard salvage regimens and thus are ineligible for ASCT. Hypothesis: Combining Rituximab with ESHAP may improve chemosensitivity and ASCT eligibility, of patients with CD20+, relapsed or refractory aggressive lymphoma, or CD20+ transformed indolent lymphoma. Objectives: The primary outcome was response rate (CR + CRu + PR) to R-ESHAP. Secondary outcomes were toxicity, ability to undergo ASCT, presence of minimal resdidual disease in the stem cell harvest, and progression free and overall survival. Methods: Eligible patients were 16–65 years old, had ECOG performance status 0–2, and had pathologically confirmed CD20+, relapsed/refractory aggressive lymphoma or transformed indolent lymphoma. Patients with refractory disease had a PR with initial anthracycline-based therapy. ESHAP (etoposide 40mg/m2 day 1–4, solumderol 500mg day 1–5, cytosine arabinoside 2g/m2 day 5, cisplatin 25mg/m2 day 1–4) was given every 28 days with GCSF support until &lt; 15% bone marrow involvement was achieved (2–4 cycles). Eight infusions of Rituximab (375mg/m2) were administered weekly concurrent with the first 2 cycles of ESHAP. GCSF mobilized stems cells were collected on day 10 or 11 when &lt; 15% bone marrow involvement was achieved (mainly in cycles 1 or 2). Results: Preliminary results of 14 of 44 planned patients are presented. Median age was 54 years (range 42–64). All pts had CD20+ aggressive lymphoma, 6 had relapsed aggressive lymphoma, 2 had refractory aggressive lymphoma (with PR after initial therapy) and 6 had transformed indolent lymphoma. Twelve of 14 patients were stage III/IV. The response rate to R-ESHAP was 93% (2 CR, 2 CRu, 9 PR, 1 PD). Thirteen of 14 patients proceeded to ASCT. Data on minimal residual disease in the stem cell harvest is pending. Grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia, neutropenia and anemia occurred with 53%, 31%, and 20% of R-ESHAP cycles respectively. Two of 14 patients had febrile neutropenia, one with bacteremia. Two patients had non-neutropenic bacteremia (1 with septic shock). There were no toxic deaths. Median follow-up post-ASCT is 5 months (range 1–18). Two patients progressed 4 and 5 months post-ASCT respectively. There were 3 deaths, 2 lymphoma related and 1 due to accelerated Parkinson’s Disease. Median PFS has not yet been reached. Conclusions: This trial is still accruing patients. However, preliminary results are promising. R-ESHAP appears to be well tolerated with a high response rate. This regimen may enable more patients with relapsed/refractory aggressive lymphoma or transformed indolent lymphoma to proceed to ASCT.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 109-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Recher ◽  
Bertrand Coiffier ◽  
Corinne Haioun ◽  
Christophe Fermé ◽  
Thierry Jo Molina ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 109 Two previous studies conducted in the prerituximab era have demonstrated the superiority of the intensive chemotherapy regimen ACVBP over standard CHOP in DLBCL (Tilly H et al. Blood 2003;102:4284; Reyes F et al. N Eng J Med 2005;352:1197). In order to investigate the role of intensive chemotherapy associated with rituximab, the GELA initiated in 2003 a multicenter, phase III open-label, randomized trial comparing efficacy and safety of R-ACVBP vs R-CHOP in younger DLBCL patients with an age-adjusted IPI (aaIPI) of 1. Patients and methods: Patients between 18 and 59y with DLBCL and aaIPI=1 were eligible. R-ACVBP consisted of 4 induction courses given every 2 weeks: rituximab (375 mg/m2) on d1, doxorubicin (75 mg/m2) on d1, cyclophosphamide (1200 mg/m2) on d1, vindesine (2mg/m2) on d1 and 5, bleomycin (10 mg) on d 1 and 5, prednisone (60 mg/m2) from d1 to d5, and intrathecal methotrexate (IT) (15 mg) on d2, G-CSF from d6 to d13. Patients then received a sequential consolidation therapy: 2 courses of methotrexate (3 g/m2) plus leucovorin rescue, 4 courses of rituximab (375 mg/m2), etoposide (300 mg/m2) and ifosfamide (1500 mg/m2) on d1, and 2 courses of cytosine-arabinoside (100 mg/m2, SC) for 4 days, each consolidation course being administered at a 14-day interval. Standard R-CHOP was delivered every 3 weeks for 8 cycles along with IT methotrexate at d1 of the first 4 cycles. The primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy of R-ACVBP compared to R-CHOP as measured by the event-free survival (EFS). Secondary endpoints were response rate, progression free survival (PFS), disease-free survival (DFS) for complete responders, overall survival, neuro-meningeal relapse rate and toxicities. Results are presented on an intend-to-treat basis. Response to treatment was evaluated according to 1999 Cheson criteria. Results: From December 2003 to December 2008, 380 patients were randomized in 73 hematology/oncology departments of the GELA. One patient withdrew his consent the day of randomization and 379 received at least one day of study treatment, 196 with R-ACVBP and 183 with R-CHOP. Median age was 47y (18-59). Patient characteristics were well-balanced in terms of demography and baseline disease status: male gender, 59%; stage III-IV, 55%; elevated LDH, 44%; mass>10 cm, 22%; B symptoms, 28%; number of extra-nodal sites >1, 26%; bone marrow involvement, 13%. Overall response rate was 90.3% in the R-ACVBP group and 88.5% in the R-CHOP group (p=0.57). Complete remission rate (CR+CRu), was 82.7% for R-ACVBP and 80.3% for R-CHOP (p=0.56). At the time of this final analysis, in June 2010, the median follow-up was 44 months. The 3-year EFS was 80.9% (95% confidence interval (CI) 74.5–85.9) in the R-ACVBP group and 66.7% (CI 59.2–73.2) in the R-CHOP group (p=0.0035, hazard ratio (HR) 0.559). Significant differences were also observed for PFS (86.8% at 3 years (CI 80.9–91.0) vs 73.4% (CI 66.1–79.3), p=0.0015, HR 0.482), DFS (91.3% at 3 years (CI 85.1–95.0) vs 80.3% (CI 72.8–85.9), p=0.0019, HR 0.393) and overall survival (92.2% at 3 years (CI 87.1–95.3) vs 83.8% (CI 77.2–88.6), p=0.0071, HR 0.439). Patients in the R-ACVBP group experienced more frequently a serious adverse event (42% vs 15% in the R-CHOP group). Grade 3–4 hematological toxicity was more frequent in the R-ACVBP group, with a higher proportion of patients receiving red cell (51% vs 7% for R-CHOP) or platelet transfusions (13% vs 1%) and/or experiencing febrile neutropenia (39% vs 9%). There were 3 deaths (1.5%) attributed to toxicity of study treatment in the R-ACVBP group and 2 (1.1%) in the R-CHOP group. Conclusions: Compared to standard R-CHOP, intensified immunochemotherapy with R-ACVBP significantly improves EFS, PFS, DFS and overall survival with increased but manageable hematological toxicity in younger patients with DLBCL. Disclosures: Coiffier: Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding. Gisselbrecht:Roche: Research Funding. Bosly:Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Tilly:Amgen: Honoraria.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 1796-1796
Author(s):  
Felipe Samaniego ◽  
Jillian F Wise ◽  
Luis Fayad ◽  
Michelle Fanale ◽  
Fredrick Hagemeister ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1796 Background: CD74 is the invariant chain of the MHCII complex and has an established role as a chaperone protein, which also prevents premature loading of antigenic peptides to the MHC. More recently, CD74 has been implicated as having a role in cancer development by its mediating the prosurvival signaling of the ligand macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) stimulation and it's associated higher level expression in chemoresistant cancers. Blocking of CD74, the receptor for MIF, or its downstream target, a4b1 integrin has been reported to block the homing of CLL cells to bone marrow. The hLL1 antibody (Milatuzumab; Immunomedics, Inc, Morris Plains, NJ) shows promising anti-cancer activity, with eradiation of lymphoma and myeloma xenografts in mice through an undefined mechanism of action. Because of this apparent central role in cancer development, we examined CLL cells of patients (pts) treated with humanized anti-CD74 antibody hLL1. Study Design: Adults with relapsed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma or CLL, who had at least one prior therapy, were enrolled on this phase I-II trial. Patient criteria; ANC 1000, hemoglobin 9, platelets 50,000, adequate organ function, ECOG performance of 1–2, provided informed consent. The hLL1 antibody, in 4 or 8 mg/kg dosages, was administered intravenously over 4 hours, two or three times per wk for 4 wks. Results: Seven pts (4 male) with a median age 65 (range 57–72) with a median 2 (range 1–4) prior chemotherapy treatments were enrolled. Histologies included showed 1 pts with large B cell lymphoma, 5 with pts with SLL/CLL (5) and 1 with marginal zone lymphoma. All pts completed therapy except one who received 5 of 8 doses of planned therapy; 2 pts received dose escalated hLL1 at 8 mg/kg. The hLL1 was well-tolerated with some infusion related side effects, which responded to medications. All other patients maintained adequate hematologic indices, which did not prevent completing the initial therapy plan. Tumor responses were: one partial response, 1 progression, 1 non-evaluable, and 4 with stable disease. Pts' tumor cells were analyzed by reverse-phase protein analysis for activation status of 120 signaling proteins. In 4 of 4 pts with CLL, hLL1 therapy was associated with consistently lower phosphorylated levels of Akt T308 and Notch3; but whether this effect was caused by other concurrent medications could not be ruled out. All the pts who had elevated lymphocyte counts (with bone marrow involvement) showed a rise in lymphocyte counts (Figure) during treatment with hLL1 therapy and then returned to baseline or below baseline after completing infusion. Interestingly, the blocking of CD74 has been shown to interfere with the homing of CLL cells to bone marrow through the binding of CD74-dependent a4b1 integrin. The binding of CLL a4b1 integrin to stroma is a potent cell survival stimulus. To ascertain this mechanisms of CD74 hLL1 antibody induced release of lymphocytes, we analyzed migration of CLL cells in transwell towards MIF. CLL cells without hLL1 exposure had a 2–3 fold cell number migration towards MIF indicating these cells have an intact CD74 receptor mechanism. This analysis suggests that hLL1 targets CLL cells in vivo and interferes with homing of CLL. Follow up analyses will examine whether CLL cells of hLL1-treated pts downregulate a4b1 integrin mediate binding and alter binding to bone marrow stroma. Uncovering such actions are important steps in the elucidation of hLL1's mechanisms of action and for the development of targeted therapies for hematopoietic cancers. Disclosures: Fanale: Novartis Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; MedImmune: Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding. Goldenberg:Immunomedics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1500-1500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Kathryn Malecek ◽  
Shaina Rozell ◽  
Benjamin A. Chu ◽  
Trifilio Steve ◽  
Natalie Galanina ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Central nervous system (CNS) relapse in pts with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is a generally fatal complication, with median overall survival (OS) of less than six months (Abramson et al., 2010). Several studies have identified features associated with increased risk of CNS relapse, such as extranodal (EN) sites of disease, elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), presence of B symptoms, and bone marrow involvement (Bernstein et al., 2009; van Besien et al., 1998). Moreover, multivariate analyses have suggested that LDH greater than 3x upper limit of normal (ULN) is strongly associated with increased risk of death or progression among patients with aggressive NHL (Zhou et al., 2014). Despite little evidence on its true efficacy, prophylaxis (ppx) intrathecal (IT) chemotherapy, most frequently with methotrexate (MTX), is often used to among pts thought to be at high risk for CNS relapse. Data on efficacy or need for CNS prophylaxis in patients receiving infusional therapy with etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and rituximab (R-EPOCH) is not available. As R-EPOCH, is being increasingly used in pts with lymphoma, we sought to evaluate the role of IT chemotherapy when used with this regimen. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review analysis of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who received R-EPOCH as frontline therapy, between 2005 and 2014. Use of IT ppx was at the discretion of the treating physician. We excluded patients under the age of 18, those receiving fewer than two cycles of R-EPOCH, those with CNS involvement at time of diagnosis, and those who received high-dose intravenous CNS ppx. Two-tailed Fisher's exact test was used to determine whether any of the following baseline features was associated with risk of CNS relapse: age>60, ECOG PS>1, LDH>normal and/or >3x ULN, presence of B symptoms, two or more EN sites, anatomic location of EN sites, international prognostic index (IPI) score > 1, bone marrow involvement, and HIV infection. In order to determine whether IT ppx was associated with any improvement in CNS and/or systemic control of disease, we compared, using Kaplan-Meier survival curves with log-rank analyses, the patterns of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and freedom from CNS progression (FFCP, in which death is not counted as an event) between patients receiving IT ppx and those not receiving it. Results: We identified 117 patients for analysis. Median age was 53 (range 19-80). 26% had ECOG PS>1; 76% had LDH above upper limit of normal (ULN). 38% had two or more EN sites of disease, and 68% had stage III-IV disease. 62 patients received IT ppx, and 55 did not. Of those receiving IT ppx, 95% received MTX, with the remainder receiving cytarabine. Those receiving IT ppx were more likely to have >1 EN site of disease, and IPI score >1 (Table 1). A total of seven had observed CNS relapse, occurring at a median of 6 months from time of NHL diagnosis (range 2-24 months). At a median follow up of 18 months, the 24-month PFS and OS were 80% and 83%, respectively. Median PFS and OS were not reached. The only factors associated with increased risk of CNS relapse were genitourinary EN disease and LDH >3x ULN (Table 2). There were no significant differences in OS, PFS, or FFCP among patients who did and did not receive CNS prophylaxis (Figure 1, panels A-C). Conclusions: The risk of CNS progression among DLBCL patients receiving R-EPOCH was similar to previous reports with R-CHOP, at 6%. GU location of EN disease and LDH >3xULN were associated with increased risk of CNS relapse. IT ppx was not associated with improved outcomes. Despite the common use of IT PPX in pts treated with R-EPOCH, our data suggest that this practice might not impact CNS progression and/or relapse, though randomized studies would be needed to answer this. Such studies are warranted in order to better determine what factors are associated with CNS progression, and whom, if anyone, may benefit from IT ppx. Figure 2. Figure 2. Disclosures Nabhan: Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding. Petrich:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document