Azacytidine and Vorinostat in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) Diagnosed with Therapy-Related Myelodysplastic Syndromes/Acute Myeloid Leukemia (t-MDS/AML)

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 5627-5627
Author(s):  
Yesid Alvarado ◽  
Michael J Keating ◽  
Susan O'Brien ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
William G. Wierda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Tp53 Mutation ◽  
Bone Marrow Involvement ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Cycle Number ◽  
Prognostic Features

Abstract Background: There is evidence of a leukemogenic effect of purine analogues, mainly when combined with DNA-damaging agents. Various series report an approximately 5% rate of t-MDS/AML in patients treated with a fludarabine-based regimen. Patients are generally old, and old age is associated with worse outcomes. To date, there is no established standard therapy recommendation for this group of patients, and results of prospective treatment evaluations are scarce. Aim: To determine the characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with CLL and t-MDS/AML. Methods: We analyzed a group of 6 patients with newly diagnosed t-MDS/AML who were treated in our institution from September 2011 to July 2014. Patients were enrolled in a phase II trial of azacitidine (75 mg/m2 IV daily x 5 days) in combination with vorinostat (200 mg orally three times daily x 5 days) (Arm A) or azacitidine alone (Arm B), with courses repeated every 3-8 weeks. This trial was designed to uniformly treat patients not eligible for other leukemia protocols due to comorbidities. Results: At baseline, all patients had an underlying diagnosis of CLL that was in remission or minimally active. The median percentage of CLL bone marrow involvement was 10% (range 0-60%), and ALC was 0.9 K/uL (range 0.2-9.79). The median number of prior CLL treatments was 2 (range 0-3). All patients had previously received fludarabine-based regimens. The median time from chemotherapy to t-MDS/AML diagnosis was 10 years (range 4-10). All patients were male, and the median age was 72 years (range 52-72). All patients had 3-line cytopenia, with median WBC 2.3 K/uL (range 0.8-8.9), ANC 0.55 K/uL (range 0-1.22), hemoglobin 9.6 G/DL (range 8.3-10.4), platelets 39 K/uL (range 6-80), and bone marrow blast percentage of 5% (range 1-18%). The karyotype was complex in all patients. Molecular studies showed that 3 patients had TP53 gene mutations. Five patients received treatment in Arm A, and only 1 patient was randomized to Arm B. Patients received a median of 4 cycles (range 2-7) and remained in the study for a median time of 216 days (range 86-329) before progression. None of the patients achieved remission, but stable disease was observed in 5 out of 6 patients. At the time of this analysis, 4 patients are dead and 2 are still alive: one discontinued treatment because of prolonged myelosuppression and is receiving best supportive care, and the other is recovering from cycle number 4 of treatment. The median survival in the group from the time of treatment initiation was 10.1 months and from the time of study discontinuation was 3.1 months. Further therapy was attempted in 3 patients without response. Conclusion: This is a group of patients with poor prognostic features. Azacytidine and vorinostat have been previously reported to be a safe combination (Garcia-Manero et al. ASH 2010, abstract 604) and may constitute a reasonable treatment alternative. Further prospective studies involving larger numbers of patients are required. Abstract 5627. Table 1: Baseline Patient Characteristics. Patient Age WBC K/uL Hb G/DL Plt K/uL BM Blast % CLL BM % Cytogenetic Molecular Prior CLL Treatments Treatment Arm Best Response 1 52 11 9.6 6 18 60 -3,-4,-5q,-6,-7, -7p,-12, +16 TP53 mutation 1.FCR x 62. Rituximab + Lenalidomide A NR 2 74 1 10 41 3 10 -3p,-5q,-7,-15,-17,-19 TP53 mutation 1. FCR x 42. FCR x 53. BR x 2 A SD 3 68 2.2 9.4 27 6 30 +7,-7p,t(7,21) Negative 1. FCR x 62. FCR x 4 B SD 4 73 2.3 9.7 39 6 0 +2,-5q,+8,-17,-18,+19,+20,-Y Negative 1. FCR x 6 A SD 5 71 0.8 8.3 39 4 0 +2,+4,t(5;17),+6,-7,-9, +13, +15,-16,-17,+18,+19,-20,+21 Negative 1. FR x 12. BR x43. MEDI-551 A SD 6 74 2.4 10.4 80 1 10 t(1;3),inv3,-5q,-18 TP53 mutation 1. R-CHOP x 62. BR x 13. FCR x 4 A SD WBC: White blood cells, Hb: hemoglobin, Plt: Platelets, BM: Bone Marrow, CLL: Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, F: Fludarabine, C: Cyclophosphamide, R: Rituximab, B: Bendamustine, MEDI-551: anti-CD19 antibody, NR: no response, SD: stable disease. Disclosures O'Brien: Amgen, Celgene, GSK: Consultancy; CLL Global Research Foundation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Emergent, Genentech, Gilead, Infinity, Pharmacyclics, Spectrum: Consultancy, Research Funding; MorphoSys, Acerta, TG Therapeutics: Research Funding. Kantarjian:ARIAD, Pfizer, Amgen: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Long-Term Sustained Responses Following Ibrutinib Discontinuation after Frontline Therapy with Obinutuzumab Plus Ibrutinib in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 33-34
Author(s):  
Paula A. Lengerke Diaz ◽  
Michael Y. Choi ◽  
Eider F. Moreno Cortes ◽  
Jose V. Forero ◽  
Juliana Velez-Lujan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Combination Regimen ◽  
Grade 3

Single oral targeted therapies have emerged as a standard of care in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). However, accessibility, side effects, and financial burden associated with long term administration limit their clinical use. Mainly, it is unclear in what clinical situation discontinuation of oral therapy can be recommended. The combination of type II anti-CD20 antibody obinutuzumab-Gazyva® with ibrutinib (GI) has shown a significant progression-free survival benefit in patients (pts) with CLL, including those with high-risk genomic aberrations. We conducted a phase 1b/2, single-arm, open-label trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of GI as first-line treatment in 32 CLL pts. We report the outcome in pts that discontinued ibrutinib (either after 3 years of sustained complete response (CR) as stipulated in the clinical protocol, or due to other reasons). CLL pts enrolled in this protocol were ≥65 years old, or unfit/unwilling to receive chemotherapy. Pts received GI for six cycles, followed by daily single-agent ibrutinib. The protocol was designed to ensure that pts with a sustained CR after 36 months were allowed to discontinue ibrutinib. The median age was 66 years (IQR 59-73), and 6% of the evaluated pts had 17p deletion. All pts were able to complete the six planned cycles of obinutuzumab. The combination regimen was well-tolerated, and the most common adverse events (>5% CTCAE grade 3-4) were neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and hyperglycemia. The rate and severity of infusion-related reactions (IRR) were much lower than expected (Grade≥ 3, 3%), and pts without IRR had lower serum levels of cytokines/chemokines CCL3 (P=0.0460), IFN-γ (P=0.0457), and TNF-α (P=0.0032) after infusion. The overall response rate was 100%, with nine pts (28%) achieving a CR, and four pts (12.5%) with undetectable minimal residual disease (uMRD) in the bone marrow, defined as <10-4 CLL cells on multicolor flow cytometry. At a median follow-up of 35.5 months (IQR 24.5-42.7) after starting treatment, 91% of the enrolled pts remain in remission with a 100% overall survival. Sixteen pts have completed a long-term follow-up of 36 months. Six pts showed CR, with three of them achieving uMRD in the bone marrow. Ten of these pts were in PR, and only one had disease progression and started treatment for symptomatic stage I disease with obinutuzumab plus venetoclax. In total, thirteen pts (41%) have stopped ibrutinib, with a median time on treatment prior to discontinuation of 35 months. Five (16%) of these pts had CRs and discontinued after 36 months. Eight additional pts (25%) had PRs and discontinued ibrutinib without being eligible: three pts discontinued prior to 36 months due to toxicities, and five pts discontinued after 36 months (3 due to side effects, and 2 due to financially driven decision). One patient eligible to discontinue ibrutinib, decided to remain on treatment despite sustained CR. After a median follow up time following ibrutinib discontinuation of 8 months (IQR 3.5-17), only two out of 13 pts have progressed (10 and 17 months after Ibrutinib discontinuation). None of the pts that stopped ibrutinib after achieving a CR have shown signs of disease progression. Of note, the pharmaceutical sponsor provided ibrutinib for the first 36 months, after which pts or their insurer became financially responsible. This particular scenario could bias the discontinuation pattern compared to a real world experience. It also provided us with a perspective about diverse factors affecting the treatment choices of pts. In summary, the obinutuzumab plus ibrutinib combination therapy was well-tolerated, with a much lower IRR rate. Efficacy compares favorably with historical controls with all pts responding to therapy, no deaths associated with treatment or disease progression, and a longer than expected time-to-progression after discontinuation of ibrutinib. The rate of ibrutinib discontinuation was higher than reported in the literature, most likely influenced by the protocol design and financial decisions driven by the switch from sponsor-provided ibrutinib to insurance or self-paid medication. Our observations regarding safety, efficacy and lack of disease progression after ibrutinib discontinuation are encouraging, and warrant confirmation in long-term prospective studies. Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT02315768. Funding: Pharmacyclics LLC. Disclosures Choi: AbbVie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Amaya-Chanaga:AbbVie: Ended employment in the past 24 months, Other: Research performed while employed as an investigator of this study at UCSD.. Kipps:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Castro:Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Fate Therapeutics: Research Funding.

Navitoclax (ABT-263) Plus Fludarabine/Cyclophosphamide/Rituximab (FCR) or Bendamustine/Rituximab (BR): A Phase 1 Study In Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2455-2455 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas J. Kipps ◽  
William G. Wierda ◽  
Jeffrey A. Jones ◽  
Lode J. Swinnen ◽  
Jianning Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Anti Tumor Activity

Abstract Abstract 2455 Background: Navitoclax (ABT-263), a novel, orally bioavailable, small molecule, binds with high affinity (Ki ≤1nM) to Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, and Bcl-w, promoting apoptosis. In vitro, navitoclax shows potent targeted cytotoxicity (EC50 ≤ 1μM) against T and B lymphoid malignancies that over-express Bcl-2. A phase 1 trial demonstrated oral navitoclax monotherapy to be well-tolerated and to have anti-tumor activity in patients (pts) with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). However, thrombocytopenia (TCP) was the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Phase 3 studies showed improved outcomes in CLL pts with the fludarabine/cyclophosphamide/rituximab (FCR) combination, and a phase 2 trial showed bendamustine/rituximab (BR) to be effective for pts with relapsed or refractory CLL. Navitoclax enhanced R (monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapy) efficacy in preclinical models of B-cell lymphoma. Methods: This is an ongoing, international, phase 1 dose-escalation study to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of oral navitoclax in combination with FCR (Arm A) or BR (Arm B) in pts with relapsed/refractory CLL. Secondary objectives are efficacy endpoints (PFS, ORR, TTP, OS, duration of response). Eligible pts had measurable disease, ECOG performance score ≤1, ANC ≥100/μL, platelets ≥100,000/mm3, and hemoglobin ≥9.0 g/dL. Preliminary results are reported. After obtaining informed consent, pts were assigned to Arm A or Arm B based on physician preference, each consisting of 28-day dose-escalation cycles with once-daily, pre-infusion, navitoclax treatment on Days 3–5 of Cycle 1 and Days 1–3 of subsequent cycles. In both arms, R was 375 mg/m2 on Day 1 of Cycle 1; and 500 mg/m2 on Day 2 of Cycle 2 and on Day 1 of subsequent cycles. In Arm A, F 25 mg/m2 and C 175 mg/m2 were dosed on Days 2–4 in Cycles 1 and 2, and on Days 1–3 in subsequent cycles. In Arm B, B was dosed at 70 mg/m2 on Days 2 and 3 of Cycles 1 and 2, and on Days 1 and 2 in subsequent cycles. Navitoclax starting dose was 110 mg daily. Dose escalation to the next cohort (200 mg) was according to a continuous reassessment model. Tumor responses were evaluated using NCI-WG 1996 criteria. Pts could continue on navitoclax therapy for 1 yr in the absence of progressive disease or significant toxicity. Results: As of July 2010, 7 pts enrolled in the initially prioritized Arm B (BR+navitoclax); all completed the first cohort of 110 mg (median age 60 yr [range 55–72]). Study sites are currently enrolling pts in Arm A (FCR+navitoclax); 2 pts have enrolled to date. The median number of prior therapies was 2 (range 1–7). One pt had a DLT of elevated AST (Arm B, 110 mg cohort) and 1 pt had a DLT of neutropenic fever (Arm A, 110 mg cohort). In Arm B, neither TCP nor neutropenia have been DLTs. For the 7 pts with navitoclax-related AEs, the most common were diarrhea (3 pts), nausea (5 pts), and fatigue (3 pts). Seven pts remain on study; 2 pts discontinued due to disease progression and 2 withdrew per physician preference. In Arm B, preliminary antitumor best responses were assessable in 4 pts who received 2 cycles; 1 CRi in a pt with del17p- (based on lymph node [LN] response and no morphologic evidence of CLL in the bone marrow), 2 unconfirmed CRs (based on LN response and no bone marrow at this time), and 1 PR in a pt with del17p- (this pt subsequently received an allogeneic stem cell transplant). Preliminary PK results for the Arm B 110 mg cohort indicated that navitoclax PK was similar in Cycle 1 (navitoclax+BR) and Cycle 2 (navitoclax alone), and appeared comparable to PK in the navitoclax monotherapy study. Conclusions: Early results show that the combination of navitoclax with BR is well-tolerated, without DLTs of TCP or neutropenia, and show evidence of anti-tumor activity. Data are limited in the FCR portion of the study. The maximum tolerated dose of navitoclax has not been reached. Accrual is ongoing and following completion of the dose-escalation components of this study, expanded cohorts of pts will be assessed using the recommended phase 2 dose of navitoclax to further assess the tolerability and dose, and to continue to explore for efficacy signals in combinations. Preliminary data in combination with BR are encouraging. Disclosures: Kipps: Abbott Laboratories: Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Research Funding. Wierda: Abbott: Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Jones: Glaxo Smith-Kline: Consultancy; Abbott: Research Funding. Swinnen: Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Yang: Abbott: Employment. Cui: Abbott: Employment. Busman: Abbott: Employment. Krivoshik: Abbott: Employment. Enschede: Abbott: Employment. Humerickhouse: Abbott: Employment.

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Cells With Trisomy 12 Home To The Bone Marrow In a CXCR4-Independent Manner and Are Prone To Proliferate In Vitro

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 870-870
Author(s):  
Evelyn Hutterer ◽  
Elisabeth Hinterseer ◽  
Sylvia Ganghammer ◽  
Gabriele Brachtl ◽  
Daniela Asslaber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Independent Manner ◽  
Atypical Cell ◽  
Trisomy 12 ◽  
Inside Out

Abstract Trisomy 12 (tri12) is a frequent chromosomal aberration in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) associated with atypical cell morphology, high in vivo tumor proliferation activity and a predisposition to Richter’s transformation. Tri12 harboring CLL cells express increased levels of the negative prognostic marker CD49d, the α4 subunit of the integrin very late antigen 4 (VLA-4), which we previously identified as a key regulator of CLL cell homing to bone marrow (BM). During this process, inside-out activation of VLA-4 upon CXCR4 binding to endothelially displayed CXCL12 is thought to upregulate the adhesive properties of VLA-4 and augment the arrest of CLL cells on the VCAM-1 presenting vessels. Here, we investigated the functional interplay of VLA-4 and CXCR4 in CLL carrying tri12. We first found that the upregulation of CD49d expression in this subset (MFIR CD49d 9.8±5.3 (n=22) vs. 2.7±3.9 (n=126), p<0.0001) was paralleled by their reduced CXCR4 expression (MFIR CXCR4 11.8±7.2 (n=22) vs. 22.7±14.2 (n=126), p=0.0003). Using short term adoptive transfers, we compared the ability of tri12 and no tri12 CLL cells to home to the BM of NOD/SCID mice. 5-10x106 CLL cells were injected into tail vein and homing was evaluated after 3 hours. Based on their more frequent CD49d high phenotype, we observed increased homing rates (homed human CLL cells per 106 injected cells per 106 acquired murine cells) of tri12 compared to no tri12 CLL (225±160 (n=7) vs. 90±117 (n=20), p=0.025). However, when comparing CD49d+ tri12 and CD49d+ no tri12 subsets, we did not observe any significant differences in their homing capacity. To further study CXCL12/CXCR4 function in BM homing, we pretreated mice with either the novel CXCL12 antagonist NOX-A12 or the CXCR4 inhibitor AMD3100 prior to CLL cell injection. While homing of no tri12 CLL cells (n=3, in duplicates) was reduced by both pretreatments (homing rates 137 vs 38 vs 30), the homing capacity of tri12 CLL cells (n=3, in duplicates) was not affected. We next tested whether VLA-4 expressed on these cells was able to undergo CXCL12-induced activation and support cell arrest under shear conditions. To this end, we perfused CLL cells over VCAM-1 or VCAM-1/CXCL12 substrates and analyzed rates and categories of cell tethering at a single cell level by videomicroscopy. CXCL12 induced the arrests of no tri12 CLL cells (n=3) on VCAM-1 under shear flow in a CXCR4 and VLA-4 dependent manner. In contrast, tri12 CLL cells (n=3) robustly tethered to VCAM-1 in the absence of the chemokine, and interactions could not be further enhanced by additional CXCL12 nor could they be abrogated by use of AMD3100. This failure of CXCR4-induced adhesion was not based on a general defect in CXCR4 functionality as in vitro chemotaxis of tri12 CLL cells (n=5) towards CXCL12 was fully maintained. To detect potential differences in VLA-4 affinity regulation, we used a conformationally sensitive antibody that recognizes epitopes induced by VLA-4 ligation, and an LDV-containing VLA-4 specific ligand to probe resting integrin affinity. Also, we used a small fluorescent ligand to study rapid VLA-4 affinity changes during inside-out chemokine induced activation. On resting tri12 CLL, VLA-4 exhibited an affinity state similar to that observed on circulating lymphocytes, and tri12 CLL cells failed to undergo the rapid affinity up-regulation triggered by CXCL12 pretreatment, in keeping with tethering experiments. Next, we investigated whether the tumor microenvironment has a different influence on the behavior of the tri12 subset. Therefore we subjected the cells to in vitro co-cultures mimicking the lymphoid proliferation centers. Basal levels of the early activation marker CD69 were similar in tri12 CLL compared to no tri12 cases. Tri12 CLL, however, underwent stronger activation when cultured in presence of accessory cells (%CD69+ cells 60.0±18.5 (n=4) vs. 17.7±20.1 (n=19), p=0.008). Moreover, in several setups, proliferation rates of these cells were increased, irrespective of the proliferative stimulus and detection method used. In summary, our results provide a mechanistical basis at least in part explaining the peculiar and clinical features of the tri12 CLL subset. In light of the specific migratory and proliferative properties of tri12 cells and novel agents targeting particularly these functions, our findings may also imply therapeutical consequences. Disclosures: Greil: NOXXON Pharma AG: Research Funding. Hartmann:NOXXON Pharma AG: Research Funding.

Ixazomib, Dexamethasone and Rituximab in Previously Untreated Patients with Waldenström Macroglobulinemia

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 2956-2956 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge J. Castillo ◽  
Joshua Gustine ◽  
Kirsten Meid ◽  
Toni Dubeau ◽  
Guang Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Bone Marrow Involvement ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Induction Phase ◽  
Primary Therapy ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Median Serum

Abstract Introduction: Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM) is an incurable B-cell lymphoma characterized by the accumulation of IgM-secreting lymphoplasmacytic cells in the bone marrow and other organs. Bortezomib in combination with rituximab and dexamethasone (BDR) is highly active as primary therapy in WM, though treatment-related neuropathy is common with BDR in WM, and often leads to premature treatment discontinuation. Ixazomib is an orally administered proteasome inhibitor with limited neuropathy that is active in myeloma, but has not been previously evaluated in WM Methods: Symptomatic, previously untreated patients with a clinicopathological diagnosis of WM were included in this prospective, single-arm phase II study evaluating ixazomib 4 mg PO on days 1, 8 and 15 + dexamethasone 20 mg PO/IV on days 1, 8 and 15 + rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV on day 1 (IDR) were administered for six 4-week cycles (induction) followed by six 8-week cycles (maintenance). Rituximab was held for the first two cycles of therapy to minimize risk of IgM flare. Zoster prophylaxis and proton pump inhibitors were administered throughout IDR therapy. The study was approved by the institutional review board at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and registered under Clinicaltrials.gov ID NCT02400437. Results: Twenty-six WM patients were enrolled and were exposed to IDR therapy. The median age at WM diagnosis was 63 years (range 46-81 years) and the median age at initiation of therapy was 65 years (range 46-82 years). Baseline median hemoglobin was 10.2 g/dl (range 6.9-13.2 g/dL), median serum IgM level was 5,068 mg/dl (range 653-7,650 mg/dL), 46% of patients had lymphadenopathy and 12% had splenomegaly. The median bone marrow involvement was 55% (range 5-95%). The MYD88 L265P gene mutation was identified in all cases. CXCR4 gene mutations were identified in 15 patients (58%), of whom 10 (67%) had nonsense, and 5 (33%) frameshift mutations. Sixteen patients have completed the induction phase of therapy at this time. Following induction therapy, the median serum IgM level decreased to 2,316 mg/dl (range 287-5,820 mg/dL), median hemoglobin increased to 13.1 mg/dl (range 10.4-14.6 g/dL), and median bone marrow involvement decreased to 23% (range 0-76%). P-value <0.001 for all comparisons against baseline. Using consensus response criteria, the overall response rate was 88% (VGPR 6%, PR 44%, MR 38%) with a major response rate of 50%. Major responses (VGPR + PR) were observed in 47% of patients with CXCR4 mutations versus 64% in those who were wild-type CXCR4 (p=0.32). The median time to response was 8 weeks. The median time to response in CXCR4 mutant patients was 12 weeks versus 8 weeks in wild-type CXCR4 patients (log-rank p=0.03). Four patients have been taken off study; 2 for lack of response, 1 due to lack of clinical benefit with persistent failure to thrive while in PR, and 1 for progressive neuropathy while in PR although in part due to worsening of diabetic neuropathy. No other grade 3 or 4 adverse events were reported. Conclusion: These preliminary data suggest that the combination of IDR is an active and well-tolerated, neuropathy-sparing regimen in symptomatic untreated WM patients. Disclosures Castillo: Biogen: Consultancy; Otsuka: Consultancy; Abbvie: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria; Millennium: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria.

Contempo: Preliminary Results in First-Line Treatment of Follicular Lymphoma with the Oral Dual PI3K-δ,γ Inhibitor, Duvelisib, in Combination with Rituximab or Obinutuzumab

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 2979-2979 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carla Casulo ◽  
Juan-Manuel Sancho ◽  
Koen Van Eygen ◽  
Sven de Vos ◽  
Santiago Mercadal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Bone Marrow Involvement ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Dose Modification

Abstract Background: Duvelisib is an oral, dual inhibitor of PI3K-d,γ, in development for the treatment of hematologic malignancies, including follicular lymphoma (FL). Duvelisib disrupts PI3K-d,γ-mediated signaling within tumor cells and their interactions with the tumor microenvironment, hindering hematologic tumor cell survival. Data from a Phase 1 study of duvelisib indicate the potential for duvelisib to be an effective treatment for FL, with an acceptable safety profile. CONTEMPO (NCT02391545), is designed to evaluate the safety and clinical activity of duvelisib in combination with rituximab (DR) or obinutuzumab (DO) in patients (pts) with previously-untreated CD20+ FL. Methods: In CONTEMPO, duvelisib is administered at 25 mg BID continuously in 28-day treatment cycles, combined either with rituximab (375 mg/m2 for 4 weekly doses, then 1 dose every 2 cycles) or obinutuzumab (1000 mg for 4 weekly doses, then 1 dose every 2 cycles). Pts are assigned 1:1 into the two parallel treatment arms. Key inclusion criteria include: diagnosis of previously-untreated CD20+ FL, Stage II with bulky disease (≥ 7 cm lesion), or Stage III-IV disease, at least 1 measurable disease lesion > 1.5 cm, adequate liver and renal function, and no clinical evidence of transformation to a more aggressive subtype of lymphoma or Grade 3B FL. Prophylaxis for herpes (HSV/VZV) is recommended. For pts with a history of CMV infection requiring treatment, prophylaxis and monitoring of reactivation is recommended. The original protocol mandated PJP prophylaxis when CD4 counts were ≤ 200 cells/mm3, and was subsequently amended to include all pts. Disease response assessments (CT scans and physical exams) occur on Day 1 of Cycle 4 (C4), C8, C12, C16, C20, and C26. Results: As of 19 July 2016 (data cut-off), 28 pts received DR and 27 received DO. For DR pts, the median age was 58 years, most were male (64%), 21% had Gr 1 and 64% Gr 2 disease at baseline, and 54% had bone marrow involvement. Median time from diagnosis was 2.3 months. For DO pts, the median age was 58 years, most were female (59%), 48% had Gr 1 and 30% Gr 2 disease at baseline, and 59% had bone marrow involvement. Median time from diagnosis was 2.6 months. DR pts were on treatment for a median of 3.9 months, DO pts for 4.5 months. The overall response rate (ORR) per IWG criteria for DR was 87% and for DO was 91% (see table) The rate of AEs for DR pts was 93%, with 50% having a ≥ Gr 3 AE. 64% of DR pts had an AE leading to duvelisib dose modification (reduction or hold), while 14% discontinued duvelisib due to an AE. The most common ≥ Gr 3 AEs on DR (> 2 pts) were ALT increased (21%) and rash (14%). The rate of ≥ Gr 3 infections was 11%, including PJP (n=2; no prophylaxis, pre-amendment), followed by lung infection and pneumococcal pneumonia (1 pt, each). One PJP case resolved and the pt continued on study. The second PJP case resolved, however the pt had a subsequent fatal event of acute respiratory distress, the only fatal AE on study. The rate of AEs for DO pts was 89%, with 70% of pts having a ≥ Gr 3 AE. 63% of DO pts had an AE leading to duvelisib dose modification (reduction or hold), while 7% discontinued duvelisib due to an AE. Most common ≥ Gr 3 AEs (> 2pts) on DO were neutropenia (19%), ALT increased (15%), and AST increased (11%). The rate of ≥ Gr 3 infections was 15%, including conjunctivitis, RSV pneumonia, pyelonephritis, and septic shock (1 pt, each). No pts on DO died due to an AE. Conclusions: Preliminary clinical activity with DR (87% ORR, 22% CR) and DO (91% ORR, 18% CR) supports the potential role of duvelisib in combination with an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody as initial treatment for pts with FL. The safety profile was manageable with appropriate risk mitigation measures, suggesting further investigation of these combinations may be warranted. Disclosures Casulo: Celgene: Research Funding; Infinity: Consultancy, Honoraria. Sancho:Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celltrion, Inc: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Gyan:Amgen: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Pierre Fabre: Honoraria; Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Fresenius Kabi: Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Mundipharma: Consultancy; Roche: Research Funding. Steelman:Infinity: Employment. Pearlberg:Infinity: Employment. Goy:Genentech: Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Acerta: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; infinity: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Writing support, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Bone Marrow Hematopoietic Dysfunction in Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Is Partially Mediated By Exposure to Constituents of the Leukemic Microenvironment

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3132-3132
Author(s):  
Bryce Manso ◽  
Kimberly Gwin ◽  
Charla R Secreto ◽  
Henan Zhang ◽  
Wei Ding ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
B Cells ◽  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Healthy Controls ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Peripheral immune dysfunction in B-Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) is well-studied and likely relates to the incidence of serious recurrent infections and second malignancies that plague CLL patients. However, the current paradigms of known immune abnormalities are not able to consistently explain these complications and it is not easy to correct CLL patient immune status. Here, we expand on our preliminary reports that demonstrate bone marrow (BM) hematopoietic dysfunction in early and late stage untreated CLL patients. We found reduced short-term functional capacity of hematopoietic progenitors in BM using colony forming unit assays (Figure 1A-C) and flow cytometry revealed significant reductions in frequencies of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) populations (exemplified by Lin-CD34+ HSPCs, Figure 1D). We further report that protein levels of the transcriptional regulators HIF-1α, GATA-1, PU.1, and GATA-2 are overexpressed in distinct HSPC subsets from CLL patient BM, providing molecular insight into the basis of HSPC dysfunction. Interestingly, sustained myelopoiesis, evaluated by limiting dilution analysis in long-term culture-initiating cell (LTC-IC) assays maintained for five weeks, revealed no difference between healthy controls and CLL patients. These new data indicate that when HSPCs are removed from the leukemic microenvironment for ample in vitro culture time, they recover the ability to sustain myelopoiesis. To further assess the impact of the CLL microenvironment on HSPC biology, isolated HSPCs (CD34+ BM cells) from healthy controls were exposed in vitro to known leukemic microenvironment constituents. Exposure to TNFα, a cytokine constitutively produced by CLL B cells, resulted in rapid increases in PU.1 and GATA-2 proteins (Figure 2A-D). Similarly, addition of TNFα to the LTC-IC assay resulted in a striking ablation of myelopoiesis, even at the highest input cell concentration. Further, overexpression of PU.1 and GATA-2 were observed in HSPCs following co-culture with CLL B cells, a result that was not recapitulated when cells were exposed to IL-10, another cytokine constitutively produced by CLL B cells. These findings indicate specific components of the leukemic microenvironment are involved in HSPC modulation. Together, these findings expand on our previous observations of BM hematopoietic dysfunction in untreated CLL patients and offer new molecular insights into the contribution of the leukemic microenvironment on immunodeficiency in CLL. Disclosures Ding: Merck: Research Funding. Parikh:Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding. Kay:Morpho-sys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios Pharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Acerta: Research Funding; Infinity Pharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Cytomx Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Phase II Trial of Single Agent Panobinostat (LBH589) In Relapsed or Relapsed/Refractory Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 3952-3952 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene Ghobrial ◽  
Tiffany Poon ◽  
Meghan Rourke ◽  
Stacey Chuma ◽  
Janet Kunsman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Bone Marrow Involvement ◽  
Ct Scans ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Bone Marrow Biopsies ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 3952 Introduction: This study aimed to determine the safety and activity of panobinostat (LBH589) in patients with relapsed or relapsed/refractory Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia (WM). This was based on our preclinical studies showing that panobinostat induces significant activity in cell lines and patient samples. Methods: Eligibility criteria include: 1) patients with relapsed or relapsed/refractory WM with any prior lines of therapy, 2) measurable disease and symptomatic disease, 3) off prior chemotherapy> 3 weeks, or biological/novel therapy for WM > 2 weeks. Patients received panobinostat at 30 mg three times a week (Mondays, Wed and Fridays). Patients were assessed after every cycle for the first 6 cycles and then every 3 months thereafter. Subjects who had response or stable disease were allowed to continue on therapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. A planned restaging was performed at the end of cycle 6 including CT scans and bone marrow biopsies. Results: Twenty-seven patients have been enrolled to date. The median age is 62 years (47-80), the median lines of prior therapy is 3 (range, 1–7). All of the patients received prior rituximab. The median hemoglobin at screening is 10.3 g/dL (range 8.2–14.3), the median IgM M-spike by protein electropheresis at study entry is 1.9 g/dL (range, 0.63–5.1), and median serum IgM at baseline is 3610 mg/dL (range, 804- 10, 300). The median bone marrow involvement at enrollment was high for patients with WM, 50%, range (5-95%), with more than 10 patients having 70% or higher bone marrow involvement at baseline. The median number of cycles on therapy is 4 (range 1 – 12). 4 of the patients came off due to toxicity. Minimal response (MR) or better has been achieved in 15 (60%) of patients, with 6 (24%) PR, 9 (36%) MR. In addition, 9 (36%) patients achieved stable disease and 1 (4%) showed progression. The median decrease in IgM is 1020 mg/dL (0- 3970 decrease in IgM) with a median % decrease of 37.13%. Responses were prompt. The median time to first response was 2 cycles (range, 2–4). Bone marrow biopsies at the end of study (or at 6 months follow up) are available on 7 patients, of which 3 showed a significant decrease in bone marrow involvement and 4 showed stable involvement. The 4 patients who had stable bone marrow disease showed 1 PR and 3 MR responses by paraprotein level. Grade 3 and 4 toxicities include 4 (15%) cases of anemia including 1 case of hemolytic anemia, 1 (3%) case of grade 4 leucopenia (but the patient had grade 3 leucopenia at baseline), 7 (26%) of neutropenia, 14 (52%) of thrombocytopenia, 1 (4%) grade 3 GI bleed due to thrombocytopenia, 1 (3%) Grade 4 hyperglycemia and 1 (3%) grade 3 syncope and 3 (27%) grade 3 fatigue. The most common grade 2 toxicities were thrombocytopenia, anemia, and fatigue. There were 5 (20%) cases of asymptomatic pulmonary infiltrates of ground glass opacity observed on routine CT scans in follow up. Of these, 3 came off study for other reasons not related to the pulmonary infiltrates, 1 received a course of corticosteroids and had improvement of infiltrates, and 1 had dose reduction of therapy. All patients except for 2 have been dose reduced due to thrombocytopenia, fatigue, diarrhea, or anemia. Dose reductions include 25 mg three times a week, 20 mg three times a week and 20 mg three times every other week. The protocol was amended to allow a starting dose of 25 mg three times a week, which is better tolerated than 30 mg in this patient population. Conclusions: Panobinostat is an active therapeutic agent in patients with relapsed or refractory WM, with an overall response rate of 60% in patients with relapsed or refractory WM. The dose schedule of 25 mg three times a week is better tolerated in this patient population. Further studies to include this agent in combination with rituximab or bortezomib are being evaluated. Disclosures: Ghobrial: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Anderson:Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Richardson:Keryx Biopharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Treon:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Genentech BiOncology, Biogen IDEC, Celgene, Novartis, Cephalon: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Research Funding; Novartis Corporation: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document