Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison of Relative Efficacies Is Feasible and Useful in the Multiple Myeloma Therapy Landscape: A Comparison of Pomalidomide Plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone Versus Daratumumab

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Several new agents and regimens are available for the treatment of relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Comparison of all these is not feasible, yet therapeutic selections need to be made for optimal patient care. Both the MM-002 (Richardson et al., 2014) and MM-003 (San Miguel et al., 2013) trials have demonstrated the clinical benefits of pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone (POM+LoDEX) in improving survival outcomes for patients with RRMM who had received ≥2 prior lines of therapy. Daratumumab (DARA) monotherapy was approved in the US for the treatment of RRMM patients, based on the results of a single-arm trial (SIRIUS) (Lonial et al., 2016). To date, there are no head-to-head studies comparing POM+LoDEX with DARA. We performed an indirect comparison of the overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) between POM+LoDEX and DARA in RRMM patients with ≥2 (median of 5) prior lines of therapy. METHODS: Matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) (Ishak et al., 2015; Signorovitch et al., 2012) is a method used to conduct indirect comparisons between relative efficacies of treatments after adjusting for imbalances across trials where the study populations were roughly similar. To perform a MAIC, it is necessary that the selected studies are compatible. Both MM-002 and SIRIUS were phase II trials and included mainly patients from North America, while other geographic regions were more widely represented in the phase III MM-003 trial. Thus, the MAIC was conducted using individual patient data from the intention-to-treat (ITT) population of POM+LoDEX from MM-002 and published aggregate data on patient characteristics and outcomes for the ITT population of DARA from SIRIUS. A propensity-score logistic regression equation was used to re-weight the POM+LoDEX patients such that their aggregate characteristics matched exactly those in SIRIUS for all prognostic factors (i.e., full set) which were available in both studies. These factors included age, gender, race, disease duration, immunoglobulin heavy chain type, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, plasmacytoma, creatinine clearance, number of prior therapy lines, prior stem cell transplantation, and refractoriness to bortezomib, lenalidomide, or both. The relative treatment effects were estimated with a weighted logistic regression model for ORR and weighted Cox regression models for PFS and OS. Sensitivity analyses were also conducted by matching on only important prognostic factors (i.e., reduced set), identified from multivariate regression analyses for each endpoint. RESULTS: MM-002 and SIRIUS were generally similar in design and had sufficient overlap in baseline characteristics to allow adjustment for potential confounding. Most prognostic factors were similar between the two arms. However, patients on POM+LoDEX had worse ECOG status, while more patients on DARA had a plasmacytoma and creatinine clearance <60 mL/min and were refractory to lenalidomide, bortezomib, or both. After re-weighting, the aggregate patient characteristics for patients receiving POM+LoDEX matched those reported for DARA. The results from the analyses adjusting for all available characteristics showed no statistically significant differences in ORR, PFS, or OS between the two treatments. Similar findings were obtained by adjusting for important prognostic factors only (Table 1). OS results should be interpreted with caution as subsequent treatments cannot be adjusted for in a MAIC analysis. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis suggests that POM+LoDEX and DARA have similar clinical benefits with respect to ORR, PFS, and OS in RRMM patients with ≥2 prior lines of therapy. Treatment choice may be made between these two based on factors other than efficacy alone. MAIC analysis may be helpful in therapeutic decisions where direct comparative trials are not available, however as with any non-randomized study potential for residual confounding may still exist. Disclosures Parikh: Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership, Research Funding. Proskorovsky:Evidera: Employment, Other: As a salaried Evidera employee, I am not allowed to accept any remuneration or honoraria. Evidera received funding from Celgene.. Abouzaid:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership, Research Funding. Krotneva:Evidera: Employment, Other: As a salaried Evidera employee, I am not allowed to accept any remuneration or honoraria. Evidera received funding from Celgene.. Page:Evidera: Other: As a salaried Evidera employee, I am not allowed to accept any remuneration or honoraria. Evidera received funding from Celgene.. Pelligra:Evidera: Employment, Other: As a salaried Evidera employee, I am not allowed to accept any remuneration or honoraria. Evidera received funding from Celgene.. Guo:Celgene: Consultancy. Mouro:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ailawadhi:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Amgen Inc: Consultancy; Takeda Oncology: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Impact of Modified Thalidomide Dosing in Bortezomib/Thalidomide/Dexamethasone for Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Who Are Transplant-Eligible: A Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-122775 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 4739-4739

Author(s):

Pieter Sonneveld ◽

Maria-Victoria Mateos ◽

Adrián Alegre ◽

Thierry Facon ◽

Cyrille Hulin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Peripheral Neuropathy ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Indirect Comparison ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Post Transplant ◽

Post Induction ◽

Adjusted Indirect Comparison ◽

Equity Ownership

Introduction: For patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) who are transplant-eligible, bortezomib/thalidomide/dexamethasone (VTd) is a standard of care (SoC) for induction and consolidation therapy. Clinical practice has evolved to use a modified VTd dose (VTd-mod; 100 mg thalidomide daily), which is reflected in recent treatment guidelines. As VTd-mod has become a real-world SoC, a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) of the VTd-mod dose from recent clinical trials versus the dose included in the label (VTd-label; ramp up to 200 mg thalidomide daily) was performed to understand the effect on efficacy of modified VTd dosing for patients with NDMM who are transplant-eligible. Methods: For each outcome (overall survival [OS], progression-free survival [PFS], overall response rates [ORR] post-induction and post-transplant, and rate of peripheral neuropathy), a naïve comparison and a MAIC were performed. Data for VTd-label were obtained from the phase 3 PETHEMA/GEM study (Rosiñol L, et al. Blood. 2012;120[8]:1589-1596). Data for VTd-mod were pooled from the phase 3 CASSIOPEIA study (Moreau P, et al. Lancet. 2019;394[10192]:29-38) and the phase 2 NCT00531453 study (Ludwig H, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31[2]:247-255). Patient-level data for PETHEMA/GEM and CASSIOPEIA were used to generate outcomes of interest and were validated against their respective clinical study reports; aggregate data for NCT00531453 were extracted from the primary publication. Matched baseline characteristics were age, sex, ECOG performance status, myeloma type, International Staging System (ISS) stage, baseline creatinine clearance, hemoglobin level, and platelet count. Results: Patients received VTd-mod (n = 591) or VTd-label (n = 130). After matching, baseline characteristics were similar across groups. For OS, the naïve comparison and the MAIC showed that VTd-mod was non-inferior to VTd-label (MAIC HR, 0.640 [95% CI: 0.363-1.129], P = 0.121; Figure 1A). VTd-mod significantly improved PFS versus VTd-label in the naïve comparison and MAIC (MAIC HR, 0.672 [95% CI: 0.467-0.966], P = 0.031; Figure 1B). Post-induction ORR was non-inferior for VTd-mod versus VTd-label (MAIC odds ratio, 1.781 [95% CI: 1.004-3.16], P = 0.065). Post-transplant, VTd-mod demonstrated superior ORR in both the naïve comparison and MAIC (MAIC odds ratio, 2.661 [95% CI: 1.579-4.484], P = 0.001). For rates of grade 3 or 4 peripheral neuropathy, the naïve comparison and MAIC both demonstrated that VTd-mod was non-inferior to VTd-label (MAIC rate difference, 2.4 [⁻1.7-6.49], P = 0.409). Conclusions: As naïve, indirect comparisons are prone to bias due to patient heterogeneity between studies, a MAIC can provide useful insights for clinicians and reimbursement decision-makers regarding the relative efficacy and safety of different treatments. In this MAIC, non-inferiority of VTd-mod versus VTd-label was demonstrated for OS, post-induction ORR, and peripheral neuropathy. This analysis also showed that VTd-mod significantly improved PFS and ORR post-transplant compared with VTd-label for patients with NDMM who are transplant-eligible. A limitation of this analysis is that unreported or unobserved confounding factors could not be adjusted for. Disclosures Sonneveld: Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; SkylineDx: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Honoraria, Research Funding. Mateos:Janssen, Celgene, Takeda, Amgen, Adaptive: Honoraria; AbbVie Inc, Amgen Inc, Celgene Corporation, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen Biotech Inc, Mundipharma EDO, PharmaMar, Roche Laboratories Inc, Takeda Oncology: Other: Advisory Committee; Janssen, Celgene, Takeda, Amgen, GSK, Abbvie, EDO, Pharmar: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen Inc, Celgene Corporation, Janssen Biotech Inc, Takeda Oncology.: Speakers Bureau; Amgen Inc, Janssen Biotech Inc: Other: Data and Monitoring Committee. Alegre:Celgene, Amgen, Janssen, Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Facon:Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Hulin:celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen, AbbVie, Celgene, Amgen: Honoraria. Hashim:Ingress-Health: Employment. Vincken:Janssen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kampfenkel:Janssen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Cote:Janssen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Moreau:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

MM-008: A Phase 1 Trial Evaluating Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability of Pomalidomide + Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory and Refractory Multiple Myeloma and Renal Impairment

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.4730.4730 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 4730-4730 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Jeffrey Matous ◽

David S Siegel ◽

Sagar Lonial ◽

R. Donald Harvey ◽

Claudia Kasserra ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Renal Impairment ◽

Creatinine Clearance ◽

Research Funding ◽

Platelet Transfusion ◽

Low Dose ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Background: Pomalidomide (POM) is indicated for patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who received ≥ 2 prior therapies including lenalidomide and bortezomib and demonstrated progression on or within 60 days of completion of the last treatment (Tx). Renal impairment (RI) is a common comorbidity of multiple myeloma (MM) occurring in 20% to 40% of pts (Eleutherakis-Papaikovou, et al. Leuk Lymphom, 2007; Knudsen, et al., Eur J Haematol, 2000). POM is extensively metabolized, with < 5% eliminated renally as the parent drug (Hoffmann, et al., Cancer Chemother Pharmacol, 2013). POM in combination with low-dose dexamethasone (LoDEX) has shown efficacy in pts with RRMM and moderate RI (creatinine clearance [CrCl] < 30-44 mL/min), but pts with severe RI (CrCl < 30 mL/min; serum creatinine> 3 mg/dL) were excluded from most trials (Siegel, et al., Blood. 2012; Weisel, et al., J Clin Oncol, 2013). MM-008 is a multicenter, open-label, phase 1 study assessing the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of POM + LoDEX in pts with RRMM and normal or severely impaired renal function. Methods: Pts withRRMM (≥ 1 prior Tx) and normal kidney function or mild RI (creatinine clearance [CrCl] ≥ 60 mL/min; Cohort A—control arm), severe RI (CrCl < 30 mL/min) not requiring dialysis (Cohort B), and severe RI requiring dialysis (Cohort C) were eligible. Cohort A received POM 4 mg, and Cohort B received POM 2 or 4 mg on days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle, following a 3 + 3 dose-escalation design. Cohort B results informed the 4 mg dosing of Cohort C. All cohorts received DEX 40 mg (20 mg for pts aged > 75 yrs) on days 1, 8, 15, and 22. Tx continued until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were defined as any of the following: grade (Gr) 4 neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, Gr 4 thrombocytopenia that is a ≥ 30% decrease in platelets from baseline and requires > 1 platelet transfusion, Gr 3 thrombocytopenia with significant bleeding (requiring hospitalization and/or platelet transfusion), Gr 4 infection, or ≥ Gr 3 other non-hematologic toxicity related to POM. Serial plasma samples were analyzed to generate PK parameters. Updated PK and AE data for all cohorts will be presented. Results: As of July 17, 2014, updated data for 16 treated pts were available (8 in Cohort A; 3 in Cohort B at 2 mg; 4 in Cohort B at 4 mg; and 1 in Cohort C). Median age was 67 yrs (range, 46-76 yrs), 56% were male, all had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1, and a median time from diagnosis of 3.8 yrs (range, 0.6-12.5). No DLTs in cycle 1 were reported for any cohort. The most common Gr ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) were neutropenia, anemia, infection, and fatigue (Table). Median relative dose intensity was consistent across cohorts: 90% (Cohort A), 90% (Cohort B; 2 mg), 100% (Cohort B; 4 mg) and 100% (Cohort C). Three pts discontinued due to AEs (2 in Cohort A and 1 in Cohort B 4 mg); no deaths have occurred during treatment phase. Conclusion: MM-008 is an ongoing trial prospectively evaluating the PK and safety of POM + LoDEX in pts with RRMM and severe RI. Preliminary PK data support mean dose-normalized exposure in pts with RRMM being similar between those with severe RI and those with no or mild RI at the clinical dose of 4 mg; early tolerability data (after one cycle) are encouraging. Table Cohort A(n = 8) Cohort B(n = 3) Cohort B(n = 4) Cohort C(n = 1) Cohort Characteristics POM dose 4 mg 2 mg 4 mg 4 mg CrCl (mL/min) ≥ 60 mL/min < 30 mL/min without dialysis < 30 mL/min without dialysis < 30 mL/min with dialysis Safety Dose-limiting toxicities (n) N/A 0 0 0 Grade 3/4 AEs (n) Neutropenia 4 2 1 0 Anemia 3 1 2 0 Infection 3 2 0 0 Fatigue 2 0 0 0 N/A: Not applicable (4 mg POM is approved dose for population) Disclosures Matous: Celgene Corp: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Siegel:Celgene Corp: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Lonial:Onyx: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy. Harvey:Celgene Corp: Research Funding. Kasserra:Celgene Corp: Employment, Equity Ownership. Li:Celgene Corp: Employment, Equity Ownership. Chen:Celgene Corp: Employment. Doerr:Celgene Corporation: Employment. Sternas:Celgene Corp: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zaki:Celgene : Employment, Equity Ownership. Jacques:Celgene Corp: Employment, Equity Ownership. Shah:Celgene Corp: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Pmd-107: Marizomib, Pomalidomide and Low Dose-Dexamethasone Combination Study in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (NCT02103335): Full Enrollment Results from a Phase-1 Multicenter, Open Label Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.3326.3326 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 3326-3326 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Andrew Spencer ◽

Simon Harrison ◽

Jacob P. Laubach ◽

Jeffrey Zonder ◽

Ashraf Z Badros ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Low Dose ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽

Heavily Pretreated ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Marizomib (MRZ) is a novel, irreversible, pan subunit proteasome inhibitor (PI) with preclinical evidence demonstrating in vitro and in vivo activity in multiple myeloma (MM). This study was designed to evaluate the safety and antimyeloma activity of pomalidomide (POM), MRZ and low dose dexamethasone (Lo-DEX) (PMD) in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Thirty-eight heavily pretreated patients with RRMM were enrolled [dose-escalation cohort (n=14); recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) cohort (n=24)]. IV MRZ (0.3 to 0.5 mg/m2) was administered on Days (D) 1, 4, 8, 11; POM (3 or 4 mg) on D1 through 21; and Lo-DEX (5 or 10 mg) on D1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 15, 16, 22, 23 of every 28-D cycle. Patients received a median of 4 (range 1-9) prior lines of therapy; 100% received prior lenalidomide (LEN) and bortezomib (BTZ), 34% carfilzomib (CFZ), and 50% thalidomide. 53% of patients were refractory to both LEN and BTZ and 21% were refractory to LEN, BTZ, and CFZ. There were no dose limiting toxicities during the study. The most common study treatment related ≥Grade 3 adverse events (AEs) were neutropenia (11/38 pts: 29%), pneumonia (4/38 pts 11%), anemia (4/38 pts; 11%), thrombocytopenia (4/38 pts; 11%), and febrile neutropenia (2/38 pts; 5%), with two grade 4 AEs (neutropenia related to POM and viral infection related to DEX), and one grade 5 AE (cardio-respiratory arrest from a suspected PE related to POM). Overall, MRZ was well tolerated, did not add to the incidence or severity of POM/Lo-DEX AEs and the regimen may have fewer hematological and infectious AEs compared to that observed with POM/Lo-DEX. MRZ pharmacokinetic analysis revealed that it was rapidly cleared with a short T1/2 (6.2-11mins) and a large volume of distribution (41-86L) suggesting extensive tissue distribution. Pharmacodynamic analysis demonstrated rapid and robust inhibition of chymotrypsin-like activity in both packed whole blood (PWB) and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PMBCs), reflecting the irreversible binding nature of MRZ. Evolving inhibition of trypsin-like and caspase-like proteasome activity was also observed in PWB and PBMC with continued dosing. The overall response rate (ORR) and clinical benefit rate (CBR) for the 36 response evaluable patients was 53% (19/36) and 64% (23/36), respectively (Table 1). Subpopulation analysis demonstrated an ORR of 50% (5/10) in high risk cytogenetic patients, 56% (10/18) in LEN/BTZ refractory patients, 71% (5/7) in LEN/BTZ/CFZ refractory patients and 80% (8/10) in CFZ refractory patients. These data compare favorably against POM/Lo-Dex with a near doubling of ORR in both the total patient population and the double refractory patients. Substantial activity in high-risk patients that are triple refractory and in patients that are refractory to CFZ in prior last regimen was observed. MRZ activity in RRMM patients exposed and/or refractory to multiple PIs is likely a consequence of its unique pan proteasome subunit inhibitory actions. In conclusion, MRZ in combination with POM and Lo-DEX was well tolerated and demonstrated promising activity in heavily pretreated, high-risk RRMM patients. Table 1 Table 1. Disclosures Harrison: Janssen-Cilag: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria. Zonder:Prothena: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Other: DSMC membership. Khot:Amgen: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau. Anderson:C4 Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; Millennuim: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncoprep: Equity Ownership; C4 Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Acetylon: Equity Ownership; Acetylon: Equity Ownership; Oncoprep: Equity Ownership; Millennuim: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. MacLaren:Triphase Accelerator: Employment, Equity Ownership. Reich:Triphase Accelerator: Consultancy. Trikha:Encycle Therapeutics: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Triphase Accelerator: Employment, Equity Ownership. Richardson:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Analysis of Pomalidomide Plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma with Vs without Moderate Renal Impairment

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.3031.3031 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 3031-3031 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

David S Siegel ◽

Katja C. Weisel ◽

Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽

Rachid Baz ◽

Paul G. Richardson ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Low Dose ◽

Pooled Analysis ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Safety And Efficacy ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Support Research

Abstract Introduction: Renal impairment (RI) occurs in ≈ 20% to 40% of patients (pts) with multiple myeloma (MM; Kastritis et al, Haematologica, 2007) and is a major comorbidity with this disease (Korbet et al, J Am Soc Nephrol, 2006). Pts with MM who relapse on or become refractory to treatment (Tx) experience shortened overall survival (OS; Kumar et al, Leukemia, 2012). Pomalidomide + low-dose dexamethasone (POM + LoDEX) is approved for the Tx of relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM) in pts who have had Tx failure with lenalidomide and/or bortezomib. POM + LoDEX demonstrated safety and efficacy in pts with RRMM (MM-010; Dimopoulos et al, EHA 2015) as well as extended progression-free survival (PFS) and OS vs high-dose dexamethasone (MM-003; San Miguel et al, Lancet Oncol, 2013) or POM alone (MM-002; Richardson et al, Blood, 2014). Each trial included pts with moderate RI, and this pooled analysis examines the safety and efficacy of POM + LoDEX in pts with moderate RI. Patients and Methods: Pts from MM-002, MM-003, and MM-010 who had received POM + LoDEX were grouped by RI status (with moderate RI [creatinine clearance (CrCl) ≥ 30 to < 60 mL/min] and without RI [CrCl ≥ 60 mL/min]) and assessed for safety and efficacy. Results: Overall, from the 3 trials, data from 356 pts with moderate RI and 716 pts without RI were analyzed. Pts with moderate RI were slightly older (70 vs 63 yrs) and more commonly had International Staging System stage III disease (45.8% vs 25.4% in the 271 and 544 pts with available data). Median time from diagnosis was similar, 5.2 yrs (with moderate RI) vs 5.3 years (without RI); pts in both subgroups had a median of 5 prior Tx. The proportions of pts with moderate RI vs without RI who were refractory to LEN (95.5% vs 93.0%), BORT (82.0% vs 80.7%), and both LEN and BORT (78.4% vs 76.1%) were similar. The median Tx duration was slightly shorter for pts with moderate RI vs without RI (16.6 vs 20.4 weeks), but the median average daily dose (4.0 mg/day) and median relative dose intensity (0.9) were the same between renal subgroups. There were similar frequencies of discontinuations (7.4% vs 5.8%), dose reductions (22.7% vs 21.1%), and interruptions (63.1% vs 63.5%) due to adverse events (AEs) between subgroups of pts with moderate RI vs without RI. The most common grade 3/4 AEs for pts with moderate RI vs without RI were neutropenia (45.5% vs 48.3%), anemia (34.9% vs 27.5%), infections (31.3% vs 32.3%), and thrombocytopenia (21.3% vs 22.6%). The frequency of deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism or peripheral neuropathy was ≤ 2% in both subgroups. The overall response rate (ORR) was 32.0% vs 33.0%, the median PFS was 18.1 weeks (95% CI, 15.6-20.9 weeks) vs 21.1 weeks (95% CI, 19.0-24.3 weeks), and median time to progression (TTP) was 20.3 weeks (95% CI, 17.3-24.1 weeks) vs 24.0 weeks (95% CI, 20.1-25.6 weeks) in pts with vs without moderate RI, respectively. Consistent with the poor prognosis associated with RI, median OS was shorter for pts with moderate RI (45.6 weeks [95% CI, 37.9-50.1 weeks]) vs those without RI (62.7 weeks [95% CI, 54.9-70.3 weeks]). Conclusions: In a pooled analysis of 3 trials of pts with RRMM treated with POM + LoDEX, ORR, PFS, TTP, and tolerability results appeared to be independent of the presence or absence of moderate RI. This analysis supports the use of POM + LoDEX as a standard of care in RRMM for pts with or without moderate RI. Disclosures Siegel: Celgene Corporation: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Merck: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Weisel:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support, Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support, Research Funding; Novartis: Other: Travel Support; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria; Noxxon: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support. Dimopoulos:Genesis: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Onyx: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria. Baz:Karyopharm: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding. Richardson:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Johnson & Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Delforge:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Song:Celgene Canada: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. San Miguel:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Moreau:Millennium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Yu:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hong:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sternas:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zaki:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Palumbo:Novartis, Sanofi Aventis: Honoraria; Celgene, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genmab, Janssen-Cilag, Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Pomalidomide + Low-Dose Dexamethasone Following Second-Line Lenalidomide-Based Therapy in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Phase 2 Study Investigating Efficacy and Safety

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.4497.4497 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 4497-4497

Author(s):

David S. Siegel ◽

Gary J. Schiller ◽

Kevin W. Song ◽

Richy Agajanian ◽

Keith Stockerl-Goldstein ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

T Cells ◽

Research Funding ◽

Low Dose ◽

Group Performance ◽

Comparable Efficacy ◽

Second Line ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Background: Pomalidomide (POM) in combination with low-dose dexamethasone (LoDEX) is approved for the treatment (Tx) of patients (pts) with multiple myeloma (MM) who have had ≥ 2 prior lines of therapy, including lenalidomide (LEN) and a proteasome inhibitor. Although LEN and POM are both IMiD® immunomodulatory agents, preclinical studies have shown that LEN is not cross-resistant with POM (Ocio et al, Leukemia, 2015) and that LEN-resistant myeloma cells remain sensitive to POM (Lopez-Girona et al, Leukemia, 2012). Furthermore, sub-analyses of the MM-002 and MM-003 trials demonstrated that POM + LoDEX had comparable efficacy in pts refractory to their last prior Tx with LEN as in the overall pt population (San Miguel et al, Lancet Oncol, 2013; Richardson et al, Blood, 2014). Here, we present an updated analysis of MM-014, a single-arm, phase 2 trial of POM + LoDEX in pts with MM relapsed or refractory to LEN-based second-line therapy. Methods: Pts were ≥ 18 years old with a documented diagnosis of MM, measurable disease, 2 prior lines of Tx, and progressive disease after ≥ 2 cycles of second-line Tx with a LEN-based therapy. The Tx regimen was POM 4 mg/day on days 1-21 and LoDEX 40 mg/day (20 mg/day for pts > 75 years old) on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of a 28-day cycle; thromboprophylaxis was mandatory. Responses were assessed using modified International Myeloma Working Group criteria. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR; ≥ partial response [PR]). Secondary endpoints included time to response (TTR), duration of response (DOR), time to progression (TTP), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Secondary primary malignancies (SPMs) were monitored and recorded as serious AEs regardless of relationship to Tx. Exploratory endpoints included measures to identify potential molecular, immune, and cellular biomarkers for POM + LoDEX response, resistance, or mechanism of action. Results: Of 51 enrolled pts (N = 85 planned), 16 (31.4%) remain on Tx, and 35 (68.6%) discontinued from Tx (n = 20 due to PD, n = 7 due to withdrawal by pt, and n = 2 each due to adverse event [AE], death, lack of efficacy, and other reasons). The median age was 68.0 years, and most pts (92.2%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of ≤ 1; 34 pts (66.7%) were refractory to their last Tx with LEN, and 37 (72.5%), 2 (3.9%), and 1 (2.0%) pts had prior Tx with bortezomib, carfilzomib, or ixazomib, respectively. A total of 33 pts (64.7%) had prior stem cell transplant. The median duration of the most recent prior LEN-containing Tx was 24.6 months, and the median study follow-up time was 11.4 months. The ORR was 31.4%, including 3.9% (n = 2) with complete response, 5.9% (n = 3) with very good PR, and 21.6% (n = 11) with PR. The clinical benefit rate (≥ minimal response) was 41.2%. Of the 16 pts who achieved ≥ PR, 12 (75.0%) have an ongoing response; median TTR in these pts was 1.9 months. The median DOR based on Kaplan-Meier estimates was not reached. The 1-year PFS, OS, and TTP rates were 60.2%, 87.4%, and 64.6%, respectively. Common (≥ 5%) grade 3/4 AEs included anemia (23.5%), neutropenia (13.7%), thrombocytopenia (9.8%), fatigue (7.8%), and infections (19.6%; including pneumonia [7.8%]). AEs of special interest (any grade) included pulmonary embolism (3.9%), deep vein thrombosis (2.0%), and peripheral sensory neuropathy (3.9%); no SPMs were observed. The immune subset analysis showed a significantly elevated proportion of CD3+/CD8+ T cells after Tx (cycle 3, 5, day 1) compared with baseline (37.6% vs 30.5% of total lymphocytes; P < .01). A similar trend toward elevated proportions of CD3+ T cells (73.7% vs 66.6%) was observed; however, the difference was not significant. There was no significant change in CD3+/CD4+ T cells (35.9% vs 35.5%). Conclusions: This updated analysis of the MM-014 trial demonstrates the safety and efficacy of POM + LoDEX in pts who were relapsed or refractory to their last prior Tx with LEN. Results suggest that POM + LoDEX can be used immediately following LEN-based therapy to treat pts with relapsed/refractory MM. The study has been amended to include a cohort of pts treated with POM + LoDEX + daratumumab. Investigations of additional biomarkers, high-risk genetic aberrations, clonal evolution, and minimal residual disease in MM-014 are currently underway. Disclosures Siegel: Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Honoraria. Schiller:Incyte Corporation: Research Funding. Song:Otsuka: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria. Kaya:Celgene, Amgen, Takeda: Honoraria. Sebag:Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Reu:Celgene, Novartis and Takeda: Research Funding; Signal Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy. Mouro:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Chung:Celgene: Employment. Srinivasan:Celgene: Employment; Individual Patent: Patents & Royalties: US7,495,673B1 Used for MM-Connect Treatment Patterns Abstract.. Qian:Celgene: Employment. Rizvi:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Thakurta:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Bahlis:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Selinexor Plus Pomalidomide and Low Dose Dexamethasone (SPd) in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-117349 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1993-1993

Author(s):

Christine I Chen ◽

Heather J. Sutherland ◽

Rami Kotb ◽

Michael Sebag ◽

Darrell J. White ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Nuclear Export ◽

Research Funding ◽

Low Dose ◽

Published Data ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Introduction - The nuclear export protein exportin 1 (XPO1) is overexpressed in a wide variety of cancers including multiple myeloma (MM). Selinexor is a first-in-class Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export (SINE) compound that binds and inactivates XPO1. Selinexor forces nuclear retention and reactivation of cell cycle regulators such as p53, IkB, and Rb. Pomalidomide/dexamethasone (Pd) is approved in relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM)with an overall response rate (ORR) of 30% and progression-free survival (PFS) rate of <4 months in patients (pts) having received a prior proteasome inhibitor (PI) and IMiD. Strategies to improve the ORR and PFS are needed. In murine MM models, the combination of selinexor with IMiDs shows synergistic anti-MM activity and good tolerability. Methods- Pts with RRMM who received ≥ 2 prior therapies including lenalidomide (len) and a PI were enrolled. Selinexor was evaluated in 2 different dosing schedules of once-weekly (QW, 60 or 80 mg) or twice-weekly (BIW, 60 or 80 mg), with pomalidomide (pom)3 or 4 mg PO daily, and dexamethasone (dex) 20 mg BIW or 40 mg QW. The primary objectives were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), safety, and preliminary efficacy of the combination of selinexor, pomalidomide, and low dose dex (SPd) in pts with RRMM. Results- As of July 20th2018, 34 pts (16 male / 18 female) have been enrolled. The median age is 61 years and patients received a median of 4 (range, 2 - 9) prior treatment regimens. Thirty-two patients were IMiD refractory (21 len, 11 pom/len). Six dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed: G3 fatigue (60 mg BIW, pom 4 mg), G3 febrile neutropenia (FN) (60 mg BIW, pom 3 mg), G3 FN and G4 neutropenia (80 mg QW, pom 4), G3 thrombocytopenia (80 mg QW, pom 3 mg) and 4 missed doses in Cycle 1 due to symptomatic hyponatremia (80 mg BIW, pom 4 mg). Enrollment on selinexor 80 mg QW, pom 3 mg is ongoing. Common SPd treatment related adverse events included (all grades, grades 3/4): neutropenia (62%, 56%), thrombocytopenia (59%, 32%), anemia (53%, 29%), anorexia (56%, 0%), fatigue (50%, 9%), nausea (47%, 0% ). Thirty pts were evaluable for response, which is outlined in Table 1. Median PFS is 10.3 months with a median follow up of 9.4 months. Conclusions- Enrollment is ongoing to evaluate once weekly selinexor in combination with Pd , (SPd). This all-oral SPd combination has clinical activity with an ORR 55% in pom-naive pts with heavily pretreated MM compared to previously published data of 30% ORR for Pd alone. Similarly, the PFS on SPd is 10.3 months vs. <4 months for Pd alone. No unexpected adverse events were noted. Phase 1 dose escalation of the combination of SPd is ongoing to define the optimal RP2D. Disclosures Chen: Amgen: Honoraria. Sebag:Janssen Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. White:Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Takeda: Honoraria. Bensinger:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; amgen: Speakers Bureau. Gasparetto:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel; Takeda: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Research Funding. Leblanc:Amgen Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Venner:Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Schiller:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Celator/Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Lipe:Celgene: Consultancy. Shah:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment. Jeha:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment. Saint-Martin:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment. Kauffman:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Shacham:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bahlis:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Dacetuzumab (SGN-40), Lenalidomide, and Weekly Dexamethasone in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Multiple Responses Observed in a Phase 1b Study.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.2870.2870 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 2870-2870 ◽

Cited By ~ 15

Author(s):

Edward Agura ◽

Ruben Niesvizky ◽

Jeffrey Matous ◽

Nikhil Munshi ◽

Mohamad Hussein ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Antitumor Activity ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Low Dose ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Phase 1B ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Expansion Cohort ◽

Number Of Cycles

Abstract Abstract 2870 Poster Board II-846 Background: Dacetuzumab (SGN-40) is a humanized monoclonal antibody that targets CD40. In prior phase 1 studies, antitumor activity was demonstrated with dacetuzumab monotherapy in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma and stabilization of disease was noted in multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Preclinical data demonstrate that the addition of lenalidomide to dacetuzumab markedly enhances dacetuzumab-mediated ADCC and apoptosis in both MM cell lines and patient isolates through modulation of NK cell activity. Methods: A phase 1b, dose-escalation study of dacetuzumab, lenalidomide, and low-dose dexamethasone has been initiated in patients with relapsed or refractory MM. Patients were enrolled in a 3+3 dose-escalation scheme and were given cohort-specific doses of weekly IV dacetuzumab (4, 8, or 12 mg/kg) in addition to oral lenalidomide (25 mg, Days 1-21 every 28 days), and weekly oral dexamethasone (40 mg). At the conclusion of dose escalation, the highest tolerated dose combination was used to treat an expansion cohort, approximately half of whom were lenalidomide-naïve. The maximum number of cycles permitted was 8, or 2 cycles beyond a complete response (CR). Results: Thirty-six patients from 8 centers were enrolled and treated, 15 patients in 3 dose-escalation cohorts and 21 patients in the expansion cohort at the 12 mg/kg dacetuzumab dose level. The median age of patients was 65 years (range 48-83) with a median of 3.4 years since diagnosis (range 1-11); patients were heavily pretreated (median of 4 prior systemic regimens [range 2-14]). The median number of cycles received was 4 (range 1-8), although 14 patients remain on treatment. The most common adverse events (AEs) in the study were fatigue (47%), neutropenia (28%), thrombocytopenia (25%), diarrhea (22%), constipation (19%), and headache (19%), the majority of which were Grade 1 or 2 in severity. Two patients discontinued treatment due to dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) during Cycle 1: one patient developed Grade 3 herpes zoster (4 mg/kg); a second patient developed Grade 4 renal failure requiring dialysis (12 mg/kg). This patient had IgA myeloma with a rising M-protein and deteriorating kidney function at study entry; the patient's renal function eventually improved and dialysis was no longer required. Another patient discontinued treatment due to a serious AE that was not considered a DLT (tumor lysis syndrome). Of 33 patients who have had Investigator-assessed response evaluations according to the European Group for Bone Marrow and Transplantation criteria, 13 patients (39%) achieved an objective response (1 CR, 12 partial responses [PR]); other responses were 4 (12%) minimal responses (MR), 10 patients (30%) had stable disease (SD), 2 patients (6%) had progressive disease (PD), and 4 patients (12%) were not evaluable. Responses that occurred among lenalidomide-naïve patients (n=18) were 1 CR, 9 PR, 1 MR, 3 SD, 2 PD, and 2 not evaluable. Among patients who have previously received lenalidomide (n=18), the responses were 3 PR, 3 MR, 7 SD, and 2 not evaluable; additionally, 3 patients who are receiving treatment have not yet been assessed for response. Conclusion: The combination regimen of dacetuzumab, lenalidomide, and low-dose dexamethasone was generally well tolerated at all doses studied. Evidence of anti-myeloma activity with this combination is encouraging as antitumor activity was observed in patients with MM who have previously received lenalidomide as well as lenalidomide-naïve patients. Disclosures: Agura: Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Dacetuzumab is an investigational agent. Niesvizky:Proteolix: Research Funding, data monitoring committee; Seattle Genetics, Inc: Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Matous:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Munshi:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Hussein:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Parameswaran:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Tarantolo:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Whiting:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Drachman:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zonder:Pfizer: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Celgene: Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Safety and Efficacy in the Stratus (MM-010) Trial, a Single-Arm Phase 3b Study Evaluating Pomalidomide + Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Refractory or Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.80.80 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 80-80 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽

Antonio Palumbo ◽

Katja Weisel ◽

Enrique M. Ocio ◽

Michele Cavo ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Peripheral Neuropathy ◽

Partial Response ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Low Dose ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Safety And Efficacy ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Background: Patients (pts) with multiple myeloma (MM) who have relapsed on or are refractory to treatment (Tx) with novel agents lenalidomide (LEN) and bortezomib (BORT) have few effective options for Tx and short overall survival (OS; Kumar, Leukemia, 2012). Pomalidomide (POM) is a distinct oral IMiDs® immunomodulatory agent with direct antimyeloma, stromal cell inhibitory, and immune modulatory effects (Quach, Leukemia 2010; Mark, Leuk Res, 2014). POM has been approved in the United States and the European Union for the Tx of pts with ≥ 2 prior Tx, including LEN and BORT, and progressive disease (PD) on Tx (EU, in combination with low-dose dexamethasone [LoDEX]) or within 60 days of completion of the last line of Tx (US). Results from the pivotal phase 3 MM-003 trial demonstrated that POM + LoDEX significantly extended progression-free survival (PFS) and OS vs high-dose dexamethasone in this pt population (San Miguel, Lancet Oncol, 2013). STRATUS is a multicenter, single-arm, open-label phase 3b trial with > 85 sites across Europe designed to further evaluate safety and efficacy of POM + LoDEX in a large pt population (N = 456 at data cutoff). Methods: Eligible pts had refractory or relapsed and refractory disease (PD during or within 60 days of last line of Tx), previous BORT and LEN Tx failure, and adequate prior alkylator therapy as defined in study protocol. Pts must have been refractory to their last prior line of Tx. Key exclusion criteria included absolute neutrophil count < 800/μL , platelet count < 75,000 or < 30,000/μL (for pts with < 50% or ≥ 50% of bone marrow nucleated cells as plasma cells, respectively), creatinine clearance < 45 mL/min, hemoglobin < 8 g/dL, and peripheral neuropathy ≥ grade (Gr) 2. POM was administered at 4 mg D1-21 of a 28-day cycle in combination with LoDEX 40 mg/day (20 mg for pts aged > 75 yrs) on D1, 8, 15, and 22 until PD or unacceptable toxicity. All pts received thromboprophylaxis with low-dose aspirin, low-molecular-weight heparin, or equivalent. The primary endpoint was safety, and key secondary endpoints included POM exposure, overall response rate (ORR; ≥ partial response), duration of response (DOR), PFS, OS, and cytogenetic analyses. STRATUS is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01712789) and EudraCT (2012-001888-78). Results: As of March 17, 2014, 456 pts were enrolled and 452 had received POM + LoDEX; median age was 66 yrs (range, 37-88 yrs); median time since diagnosis was 4.9 yrs (range, 0.3-22.6 yrs). Pts were heavily pretreated with a median of 5 prior Tx (range, 2-18); 78% were refractory to BORT and LEN. Median follow-up was 6.8 mos with a median of 4 cycles received. Median PFS and OS were 4.3 mos and 10.9 mos, respectively (Figure 1). The ORR was 35%, with 6% of pts achieving ≥ very good partial response (VGPR); median DOR was 6.0 mos. Similar PFS (4.2 and 3.9 mos), OS (10.9 mos for each), and ORR (34% and 33%) were achieved in pts refractory to prior LEN (n = 427) or LEN and BORT (n = 356), respectively. In addition, PFS (4.3 and 3.9 mos), OS (11.5 mos and not estimable), and ORR (27% and 37%) were consistent in pts with LEN (N = 172) or BORT (N = 189) as last prior treatment, respectively. The most frequent Gr 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were hematologic, including neutropenia (39%), anemia (27%), and thrombocytopenia (19%); Gr 3-4 non-hematological toxicities included pneumonia (11%), fatigue (5%), and hypercalcemia (4%). Gr 3-4 deep vein thrombosis was low (1%) with prophylaxis, and peripheral neuropathy was 1%. Dose reductions of either POM or LoDEX due to TEAEs were required in 28% of pts; discontinuations due to TEAEs were infrequent (9%). Conclusions: Results from STRATUS, the largest POM + LoDEX clinical trial thus far, were consistent with those observed in the pivotal MM-003 trial, and confirm that this regimen has an acceptable safety and efficacy profile and shows substantial improvements in PFS and OS benefits. Combination therapy with POM and LoDEX represents a new standard of therapy for pts with refractory or relapsed and refractory MM in whom LEN and BORT Tx failed. Disclosures Dimopoulos: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Palumbo:Array BioPharma: Honoraria; Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genmab A/S: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria. Weisel:BMS: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria; Noxxon: Consultancy. Ocio:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding. Cavo:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Delforge:Celgene Corp: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Oriol:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy. Goldschmidt:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Doyen:Celgene Corp: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Morgan:Celgene Corp: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Myeloma UK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; International Myeloma Foundation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; The Binding Site: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MMRF: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Simcock:Celgene Corporation: Employment. Miller:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Slaughter:Celgene: Employment. Peluso:Celgene: Employment. Sternas:Celgene Corp: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zaki:Celgene Corp: Employment, Equity Ownership. Moreau:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Outcomes for Older Patients in Stratus (MM-010), a Single-Arm, and Phase 3b Study of Pomalidomide + Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Refractory or Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.4770.4770 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 4770-4770

Author(s):

Antonio Palumbo ◽

Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽

Katja Weisel ◽

Michele Cavo ◽

Enrique M. Ocio ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Research Funding ◽

Low Dose ◽

Group Performance ◽

Age Groups ◽

Dose Intensity ◽

High Dose ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background: Survival of patients (pts) with multiple myeloma (MM) decreases with increased age (Pulte, Oncologist, 2011). In addition, MM pts with advanced disease who have exhausted treatment (Tx) with novel agents have a poor prognosis (Kumar, Leukemia, 2012). Pomalidomide (POM) is a new oral agent with antimyeloma, stromal cell inhibitory, and immune modulatory effects (Quach, Leukemia, 2010; Mark, Leuk Res, 2014). In the pivotal MM-003 trial, POM in combination with low-dose dexamethasone (LoDEX) demonstrated significant progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) benefits vs. high-dose dexamethasone, with a tolerable safety profile in refractory or relapsed and refractory MM (RRMM; Dimopoulos, Blood, 2013). In MM-003, significant PFS and OS benefits with POM + LoDEX Tx were seen in different age groups; tolerability and dose intensity were not affected by age (Weisel, Blood, 2013). STRATUS is a multicenter, single-arm, open-label, European, phase 3b trial to further evaluate safety and efficacy of POM + LoDEX in a large pt population. This analysis examines outcomes by age (≤ 65 vs. > 65 yrs, and ≤ 70 vs. > 70 yrs). Methods: Eligible pts had refractory or relapsed and refractory disease (progressive disease [PD] during or within 60 days of last line of Tx), having previous BORT and LEN failure and adequate prior alkylator therapy as defined in study protocol. Pts must have been refractory to the last prior Tx line. Pts with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status > 2 were excluded. Pts received 28-day cycles of POM 4 mg D1-21 + DEX 40 mg (20 mg for pts aged > 75 yrs) once weekly. All pts received thromboprophylaxis with low-dose aspirin, low-molecular-weight heparin, or equivalent based on clinical recommendations. Tx continued until PD or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was safety; the secondary endpoints included POM exposure, overall response rate (ORR; ≥ partial response), duration of response (DOR), PFS, and OS. Outcomes were analyzed by pt age at baseline (≤ 65 vs. > 65 yrs, and ≤ 70 vs. > 70 yrs). Results: As of March 17th, 2014, a total of 456 pts have been enrolled, and 452 had received POM + LoDEX; 48% were aged ≤ 65 yrs, 52% were > 65 yrs, 71% were ≤ 70 yrs, and 29% were > 70 yrs. Pts were heavily pretreated (median 4-5 prior Tx depending on age subgroup). Median follow-up was 6.8 mos. Younger pts (≤ 65 yrs) were more likely to have better renal function (creatinine clearance ≥ 60 mL/min; 80%) than those aged > 65 (49%). Median relative dose intensity was similar independent of age (range, 0.95-0.97 mg/day). The most common grade (Gr) 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) across age groups were neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, and pneumonia (Table). Gr 3-4 deep vein thrombosis (DVT) with prophylaxis was 1% in each subgroup. Discontinuations of POM due to TEAEs were low in pts aged ≤ 65 (0.9%), > 65 (3.0%), ≤ 70 (1.3%), and > 70 (3.8%) yrs. Outcomes by age are summarized in the Table. ORR was consistent for pts aged ≤ 65 (38%), > 65 (32%), ≤ 70 (35%), and > 70 (34%) yrs; DORs were 5.1, 6.8, and 5.8 mos and not estimable (NE) in these pt populations, respectively. Median PFS and median OS were similar across all age groups (PFS range, 4.0-4.9 mos, OS range, 10.6-11.5 mos). Conclusions: The data reported here further demonstrate the tolerability and efficacy of POM + LoDEX in pts with RRMM in the age subgroups analyzed (≤ 65 vs. > 65 yrs and ≤ 70 vs. > 70 yrs). Safety profiles were consistent, while dose intensity was similar across age groups. PFS, OS, and response rates were comparable with those previously reported in trials of POM + LoDEX in pts with RRMM and reinforce 4 mg POM as an appropriate starting dose irrespective of age. These data support POM + LoDEX as a standard Tx option for pts with refractory or RRMM regardless of age. Table 1. Age ≤ 65 yrs (n = 215) Age > 65 yrs (n = 237) Age ≤ 70 yrs (n = 319) Age > 70 yrs (n = 133) Grade 3-4 TEAEs, % Neutropenia Anemia Thrombocytopenia Pneumonia 38 30 22 13 41 24 16 10 38 29 21 11 44 23 15 11 Grade 3-4 EOI, % DVT/PE PN 1 <1 1 2 1 1 1 2 Efficacy (n = 218) (n = 238) (n = 322) (n = 134) ORR (≥ PR), % (95% CI) Median DOR (95% CI), mos Median PFS (95% CI), mos Median OS (95% CI), mos 38 (31-44) 5.1 (3.8-6.7) 4.1 (3.3-4.9) 10.9 (9.0-NE) 32 (26-38) 6.8 (4.7-11.5) 4.6 (3.6-5.6) 10.6 (9.3-NE) 35 (30-41) 5.8 (20.0-28.1) 4.0 (3.2-4.8) 10.9 (9.2-NE) 34 (26-42) NE (34.4-NE) 4.9 (3.7-6.7) 11.5 (8.5-NE) EOI: events of interest; NE: Not evaluable. Disclosures Palumbo: Array BioPharma: Honoraria; Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genmab A/S: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria. Dimopoulos:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Weisel:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy; Noxxon: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Honoraria. Cavo:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Ocio:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding. Corradini:Celgene Corporation: Speakers Bureau. Delforge:Celgene Corp: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Oriol:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy. Goldschmidt:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Slaughter:Celgene: Employment. Simcock:Celgene Corporation: Employment. Herring:Celgene Corporation: Employment. Peluso:Celgene: Employment. Sternas:Celgene Corp: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zaki:Celgene Corp: Employment, Equity Ownership. Moreau:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Selinexor Shows Synergy in Combination with Pomalidomide and Low Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed / Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.3330.3330 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 3330-3330 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Christine Chen ◽

Rami Kotb ◽

Michael Sebag ◽

Richard LeBlanc ◽

Heather J. Sutherland ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Dose Level ◽

Nuclear Export ◽

Research Funding ◽

Low Dose ◽

Clinical Activity ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Introduction - The nuclear export protein exportin 1, (XPO1) is overexpressed in a wide variety of cancers including multiple myeloma (MM). Selinexor is a first-in-class Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export (SINE) compound that binds and inactivates XPO1. Selinexor forces nuclear retention and reactivation of tumor suppressor proteins (TSPs; NF-kB, p53 and FOXO) and reduction of many proto-oncogenes, including MDM2, MYC and Cyclin D. In murine MM models, the combination of selinexor with IMIDs shows synergistic anti-MM activity with good tolerability. Methods - This phase 1b/2 dose escalation study (NCT02343042) using the standard 3+3 design, is designed to determine the tolerability, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) and preliminary efficacy of selinexor in combination with pomalidomide and dexamethasone (SdP). Patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory MM who received ≥ 2 prior therapies including lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor (PI) were enrolled. Selinexor is dose escalated once-weekly (QW, starting at 80 mg) or twice-weekly (BIW, starting at 60 mg), pomalidomide 4 mg PO daily, days 1 -21 and dexamethasone (dex) 40 mg PO weekly in a 28 day cycle. Results - As of 25-Jul-2016, 11 pts (7 male / 4 female) have been enrolled. The median age is 58 years (range, 43 - 76), with a median of 5 (range, 2 - 9) prior treatment regimens. Eight pts had MM refractory to lenalidomide and 7 pts to bortezomib; including 5 pts with MM refractory to both. For the once-weekly selinexor cohort, the 80 mg dose level has been cleared and the 100 mg dose level is on going. For the twice-weekly cohort, the 60 mg dose level has been cleared and 80 mg dose level is on going. Common related grade 1/2 adverse events (AEs) include: nausea 7pts (64%), altered taste 5pts (45%), anorexia 3pts (27%), and diarrhea 3pts (27%). Grade 3/4 AEs include: neutropenia 8pts (73%), thrombocytopenia 4pts (36%), and leukopenia 3pts (27%). There was no febrile neutropenia or bleeding reported to date. No dose limiting toxicities have been observed and MTD has not been reached. Ten pts were evaluable for response including, 1 complete response (CR), 5 partial responses (PR), 3 minor responses (MR), and 1 stable disease (SD). The overall response rate (ORR) is 60% with a clinical benefit rate of 90% (ORR + MR). Responses are rapid in onset, with at least MR achieved by cycle 2 day 1. In lenalidomide and bortezomib refractory patients the ORR was 50%. One pt was deemed not evaluable due to non-compliance with study procedures. Eight pts are still on study, (range <1 - 7+ months) including 4 pts maintaining their response for > 3 months. Conclusions - The all oral combination of selinexor, pomalidomide and low dose dex (SdP) has significant clinical activity (ORR 60%) in pts with heavily pretreated MM. Responses are rapid in onset even with the lower dose cohorts tested thus far, CR can be achieved. No additive toxicities over monotherapy of either pomalidomide or selinexor have been observed. This novel treatment regimen therefore holds promise in addressing the urgent need to induce meaningful and durable responses in patients with IMiD and PI relapsed/refractory MM. Disclosures Chen: Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Sebag:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Sutherland:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria. White:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Venner:Takeda: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; J+J: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Kouroukis:Karyopharm: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. McCurdy:Celgene: Honoraria. Lalancette:BMS: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Bensinger:Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Acetylon: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding. Lentzsch:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy. Kauffman:Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Shacham:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Jeha:Karyopharm: Employment. Picklesimer:Karyopharm: Employment. Saint-Martin:Karyopharm: Employment. Choe-Juliak:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment. Bahlis:BMS: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text