scholarly journals Selecting the Best Donor for T Cell-Replete Haploidentical Transplantation: Importance of HLA Disparity, NK Alloreactivity, and Other Clinical Variables

Blood ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 130 (Suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 670-670
Author(s):  
Scott R Solomon ◽  
Michael A Aubrey ◽  
Xu Zhang ◽  
Allison Piluso ◽  
Brian M Freed ◽  
...  

Abstract Lack of a matched sibling or unrelated donor can be a significant barrier to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Haploidentical (haplo) donors are readily available for nearly all such patients. However, donor selection criteria to determine the optimal haplo donor are not readily available. In order to determine which donor characteristics are most important in predicting transplant success, we retrospectively analyzed 208 consecutive donor-recipient pairs receiving haplo HCT with post-transplant cyclophosphamide for hematologic malignancy. Donor characteristics were evaluated by multivariate Cox analysis and correlated with overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), relapse/progression, and non-relapse mortality (NRM), while controlling for significant patient and transplant-related factors. Donor variables analyzed included age, sex, relationship to recipient, CMV status, ABO compatibility, HLA disparity and several NK alloreactivity models (KIR receptor-ligand, ligand-ligand, haplotype, B content, activating KIR-based education systems, Sekine donor licensing model). Median (range) recipient and donor age was 52 (19-75) and 38 (15-73) years respectively, and 41% of donor-recipient pairs were non-Caucasian. Patients were transplanted for AML (34%), MDS/MPS/CML (20%), ALL (17%), NHL/HD/CLL (25%). PBSC was used as the stem cell source in 66% of patients, and conditioning intensity was myeloablative in 41%. The donor was a child, sibling, or parent in 47%, 38%, and 14% respectively. Median (range) follow-up for surviving patients was 33 (7-130) months. In multivariate Cox analysis, patient/transplant characteristics associated with improved OS and DFS included recipient age <55 years, black race, CMV seronegativity, low/intermediate disease risk index (DRI), and more recent transplant year. When adjusting for significant patient/transplant variables, donor characteristics independently associated with improved overall survival included presence of HLA-DR mismatch [GVH direction] (HR 0.35, p=0.010), the presence of HLA DP non-permissive mismatch [GVH direction] (HR 0.51, p=0.033), KIR receptor-ligand mismatch (HR 0.56, p=0.023), the presence of KIR B/x haplotype with KIR2DS2 (HR 0.38, p=0.005 vs. B/x without KIR2DS2; HR 0.47, p=0.013 vs. A/A), donor CMV positivity (HR 0.49, p=0.009) and donor relation (child vs. parent - HR 0.31, p=0.016; sibling vs. parent - HR 0.48, p=0.087). Donor characteristics independently associated with reduced risk of disease relapse/progression included the presence of KIR receptor-ligand mismatch (HR 0.39, p=0.001), KIR B/x haplotype with KIR2DS2 (HR 0.43, p=0.023 vs. B/x without KIR2DS2), the presence of ≥4 (out of 10) HLA allelic mismatches [GVH direction] (HR 0.29, p=0.001), the presence of a non-permissive HLA-DP mismatch (HR 0.25, p<0.001) and the use of a non-parental donor (child vs. parent - HR 0.26, p=0.010; sibling vs. parent - HR 0.37, p=0.039). Donor characteristics associated with increased NRM included higher HLA disparity (HR 7.86, p=0.016), HLA-DR match (HR 15.99, p<0.001), absence of KIR B/x haplotype with KIR2DS2 (A/A haplotype - HR 5.03, p=0.003; B/x without KIR2DS2 - HR 3.92, p=0.034), CMV seronegativity (HR 2.99, p=0.026), and female donor-male recipient (HR 2.35, p=0.071). Adjusted 3-yr OS was improved in patients with the presence of KIR R-L mm (66% vs 50%, p=0.013), KIR B/x with KIR2DS2 (69% vs. 55% [A/A] or 43% [B/x without KIR2DS2, p=0.052 and 0.007, respectively]), HLA-DR mm (64% vs. 45%, p=0.071), and HLA-DP non-permissive mm (72% vs. 56%, p=0.026), emphasizing the importance of donor HLA and KIR typing for optimal donor selection (see figure). This large, single institution analysis demonstrates the significance of HLA-DR/HLA-DP disparity, NK alloreactivity, and other clinical variables in the donor selection process for haplo HCT. These results suggest that HLA-DP and donor KIR typing should be performed routinely in T cell-replete haplo HCT to assist in donor selection and risk stratification. Disclosures Solh: ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau.

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4616-4616
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Krieger ◽  
Urmila Sivagnanaling ◽  
Katherine Webb ◽  
Dana Broadway ◽  
Catherine Roberts ◽  
...  

Background When selecting a human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matched unrelated donor (URD) for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) it is generally accepted that donor age, sex, ABO blood group and viral serologic status should be considered. However, the inter-relationship among these variables is not well established and a consensus on how strongly to consider each variable has not been reached. Selection of the optimal donor gets more complicated as new donor recipient pair (DRP) selection parameters, including killer immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIR) haplotypes are included. In this study we seek to develop a logic-based method to reduce the inconsistencies in donor selection in the HLA matched HCT. Methods VCU IRB approval was obtained for a retrospective review of eligible subjects who were adults with known KIR genotyping receiving HLA-A, B, C & DRB1 allelically matched URD HCT for hematologic malignancy between 2014 and 2017. Donor recipient pairs were selected based on donor age, sex match, CMV sero-status match, and ABO compatibility when possible; KIR genotype was not considered in DRP selection. KIR-KIR ligand interactions were calculated for each DR pair and interaction unit values were ascribed as follows; -1, when the donor possessed an inhibitory KIR (iKIR) and the recipient the corresponding HLA; +1, when the donor possessed iKIR and recipient lacked corresponding HLA (mKIR score, missing ligand). A novel inhibitory-missing KIR (IM-KIR) score was calculated for each HLA matched DRP by summing the interaction values as in equation 1. IM KIR Score = |iKIR| + |mKIRL| ………. [1] Univariate and multivariate analysis using Cox regression methods were utilized to evaluate donor parameters associated with overall survival. Weights of each donor risk variable (age, sex, CMV & ABO match) contribution were ascribed and summed up to determine donor risk parameter. Donor risk parameters and reciprocal-IM-KIR were finally combined into a donor risk index. Receiver operating characteristic curve- area under the curve (ROC-AUC) analysis was utilized to compare indices. Results Ninety-eight DRP with known HLA & KIR genotyping were studied. Median follow up at the time of analysis was 583 days. A higher IM-KIR score describes a DRP with increased iKIR-KIR ligand interactions and missing KIR ligand interactions; which was associated with a favorable survival after HCT, HR of 0.44 (95%CI: 0.26 to 0.73; P=0.002). Further analyses were performed using a reciprocal of this score. Univariate analysis of overall survival for donor age, sex match, ABO compatibility and CMV status were all statistically insignificant (p>0.05). However, the donor risk parameter was predictive of mortality with a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.76 (95% CI: 1.22-6.18, p=0.014). Covariate analysis of the donor risk parameter and reciprocal IM-KIR score were both predictive of survival independent of each other with HR 2.41 (1.05-5.54, p=0.038) and 2.35 (1.18-4.70, p=0.016) respectively. Combining the two into a donor risk index was predictive of survival with a HR of 2.38 (1.44-3.92, p=0.001). ROC-AUC comparison of survival for IM-KIR score and donor risk parameter showed statistically significant AUCs of 0.63 and 0.67 respectively. Further, the combined donor risk index shows improved sensitivity and specificity over the donor risk parameter with AUCs of 0.72 and 0.67 respectively. Conclusions A novel KIR-HLA interaction score, the IM-KIR score independently predicts survival in HLA matched DRP, as does a formalized donor risk parameter which includes non-HLA donor characteristics. Moreover, the addition of IM-KIR score to the donor risk parameter enhanced the specificity and sensitivity of predicting survival in these patients. If validated in a larger exploration and validation cohort this method of donor selection may improve the donor selection process, decreasing variability in clinical outcomes and improve overall survival. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 420-420
Author(s):  
Scott R. Solomon ◽  
Michael T Aubrey ◽  
Xu Zhang ◽  
Melhem Solh ◽  
Lawrence E Morris ◽  
...  

Abstract An HLA-DPB1 non-permissive mismatch (npmm) has been associated with higher risks of acute graft-versus-host disease and non-relapse mortality after matched unrelated donor transplantation (MUDT) and thus avoiding HLA-DPB1 npmm is important in unrelated donor selection. In contrast, HLA-DPB1 npmm by the 3-group T cell epitope algorithm (TCE-3) has been shown to be protective in the context of haploidentical donor transplantation (HIDT) using post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) (Solomon et al. BBMT 2018). Additional HLA-DPB1 "permissiveness" models, also based on cross-reactive patterns of alloreactive T cells against HLA-DPB1 alleles, include the TCE-4 (based on 4 TCE groups) and functional distance (FD, based on net difference in distance between key amino acid polymorphisms) algorithms. Lastly, an expression model is based on the surface expression of the recipient mismatched HLA-DPB1 (RDP) allele according to variants of a biallelic SNP. The present analysis had 2 major aims: to 1) determine which HLA-DPB1 permissiveness model (TCE-3, TCE-4, FD, expression) provides the best tool for haploidentical donor selection and 2) analyze the role of vector (GVH vs. HVG direction) on the effect of an HLA-DPB1 npmm. A total of 322 patients with acute leukemia, MDS, lymphoma, CLL or CML, receiving a HIDT-PTCy from a single institution were evaluated with a median follow-up time of 45 months [range 6, 184]. Baseline characteristics included a median age of 50 years [19, 80], 47% non-white, HCT-CI ≥3 in 50%, PBSC graft in 80%, and myeloablative conditioning in 49%. The number of donor-recipient pairs having an HLA-DPB1 npmm according to the TCE-3, TCE-4, FD and expression was 82 (25%), 130 (40%), 54 (17%) and 99 (31%) respectively. In univariate analysis, HLA-DPB1 npmm identified by the TCE-3 and TCE-4 models were statistically associated with improved overall survival (OS) (p=0.041 and p=0.004 respectively), whereas FD risk and RDP expression were not (see figure). For disease-free survival (DFS), only the TCE-4 model showed a statistically significant association (p=0.022). Directionality of the HLA-DP npmm (GVH vs. HVG vector) had no significant impact on survival following HIDT-PTCy, a finding similar to the context of MUDT (Fleischhauer BMT 2017). In multivariate Cox analysis, adjusting for patient/donor age, gender, race, HLA-DR mismatch and transplant year, HLA-DPB1 npmm by the TCE-4 model had the most significant association with improved OS (HR 0.59, p=0.012), with TCE-3 being less predictive (HR 0.65, p=0.07) (see figure). Furthermore, HLA-DPB1 npmm by TCE-4 led to improved DFS (HR 0.69, p=0.046) and trends for lower cumulative incidences of relapse/progression (HR 0.73, p=0.16) and NRM (HR 0.54, p=0.09). In summary, the presence of an HLA-DP npmm in either the GVH or HVG direction continues to be associated with improved survival following HIDT-PTCy in a large single institution retrospective analysis with extended follow-up. Compared to the original TCE-3 model, a TCE-4-predicted HLA-DPB1 npmm is more strongly associated with overall survival. This fact, combined with the larger number of HLA-DPB1 npmm donors identified by the TCE-4 model, suggests that it may be a better selection tool for optimal haploidentical donor identification. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Solh: Partner Therapeutics: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; ADCT Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 824-824 ◽  
Author(s):  
John E. Wagner ◽  
Mary Eapen ◽  
Richard E. Harris ◽  
Margaret L. MacMillan ◽  
Arlene D. Auerbach

While allogeneic transplantation is the only approach that can correct hematological complications of Fanconi anemia (FA), unrelated donor transplantation has been severely limited by graft rejection and regimen-related toxicity with resultant poor survival. Therefore we evaluated the impact of potential prognostic factors on hematopoietic recovery, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and overall survival in 98 recipients of unrelated donor transplantation, transplanted in 1990 to 2003. Median age at transplantation was 12 years (range 0.8 – 33). Of the 67 patients with known complementation group, 35 were in group A, 12 in group C and 7 in other groups and, 45 of 98 (46%) had diepoxybutane (DEB) T cell mosaicism. Sixty-nine percent had aplastic anemia prior to transplantation; 56% received prior androgen therapy and 24% received > 20 blood product transfusions. Fifty-four percent received cyclophosphamide and irradiation and, 46% received a fludarabine-containing preparative regimen (FLU). All patients received bone marrow grafts and 78% were matched at HLA A, B, (low resolution) and DRB1 or mismatched (22%) at a single locus. Seventy-one percent of grafts were T-cell depleted. In order to adjust for differences in follow up between recipients treated with and without FLU-containing preparative regimens (median 21 vs. 135 months; FLU was used exclusively after 1998), all patients were censored at 12 months for transplant-outcomes. Neutrophil recovery (>500/ul) was significantly less likely with non-FLU containing preparative regimens in patients with DEB mosaicism (cumulative incidence 52%, p<0.0001) than without DEB mosaicism (89%); however, neutrophil recovery was not influenced by DEB mosaicism with FLU containing preparatory regimens (94% and 93%). Similarly, platelet recovery (>20,000) was less likely with non-FLU containing preparatory regimens (19% vs. 76%, p<0.0001); favorable risk factors were absence of myelodysplasia/leukemia and < 20 blood product transfusions prior to transplantation. Acute and chronic GVHD were significantly lower in recipients of T-cell depleted grafts (17% and 18%, respectively) than recipients of non T cell depleted grafts (62% and 47%, respectively). Mortality was significantly higher with non-FLU containing preparative regimens (Relative Risk [RR] 3.24, 95% CI 1.86 – 5.66, p<0.0001), than with FLU containing preparative regimens. Corresponding probabilities of overall survival were 17% and 57%, respectively. Mortality was also significantly higher in patients who had received > 20 blood product transfusions (RR 2.10, 95% CI 1.16 – 3.76, p=0.01). Age, disease status at transplantation, HLA disparity, complementation group, DEB mosaicism or DEB sensitivity, and donor-recipient CMV status did not affect mortality. Based on these results significant practice changes should be considered: use of a FLU containing preparative regimen and transplantation prior to > 20 blood product transfusions.


Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 1968-1968
Author(s):  
Jakob R. Passweg ◽  
Fangyu Kan ◽  
Mei-Jie Zhang ◽  
Vanderson Rocha ◽  
Luis M. Isola ◽  
...  

Abstract Impact of donor characteristics is well described for standard intensity unrelated donor and matched sibling donor transplants but may differ in recipients of unrelated donor RIC transplants. Less immunosuppressive regimens at transplantation may lead to higher graft failure rates. We examined risk factors affecting graft failure, acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and survival after RIC unrelated donor transplants in 715 patients with acute (n=394) and chronic leukemia (n=74), myelodysplastic syndrome (n=70) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (n=177). Graft failure was defined as &lt;5% donor chimerism within 3 months after transplantation. 159 patients received bone marrow (BM) and 556 peripheral blood (PB) grafts. All transplantations occurred in 1999–2006 in the US. Median follow-up of surviving patients was 36 months (range 6–92). All donors and recipients were typed for HLA A, B, C and DRB1 using high resolution molecular methods. Mismatches at low resolution (antigen) and high resolution (allele) were considered together and are described collectively as mismatches. The day-28 incidence of neutrophil recovery (≥ 0.5 x 109/L) was 96%. After initial neutrophil recovery most patients (n=506) had &gt;95% donor chimerism. 63 patients had &lt;5% donor cells and the remaining 146 patients, 5–95% by 3-months post-transplant. In multivariate analysis, the only factor associated with graft failure was transplantation of BM vs. PB grafts (odds ratio 2.36, p=0.002). We specifically looked for an effect of donor-recipient sex match on graft failure and female donor parity on GvHD and found none. As expected risks of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) were higher after mismatched transplants (p=0.015). No donor characteristic was associated with chronic GVHD. The only donor characteristic affecting overall survival was donor-recipient HLA disparity: 3-year overall survival rates were significantly lower at 23% after mismatched transplants compared to 42% after HLA-matched transplants (p=0.008). Additionally, mortality rates were significantly higher in patients older than 50 years (p=0.005), performance score &lt;90 (p=0.002) and when transplantation occurred with active disease (p&lt;0.001). As seen in recipients of myeloablative conditioning regimens, the only donor characteristic associated with survival is donor-recipient HLA disparity. Donor age, donor-recipient sex match, donor parity and donor cytomegalovirus serostatus were not associated graft failure or survival after unrelated donor RIC transplants.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 5889-5889 ◽  
Author(s):  
Audrey Simon ◽  
Eddy Roosnek ◽  
Yordanka Tirefort ◽  
Yan Beauverd ◽  
Carole Dantin ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: To decrease graft versus host disease (GvHD), the Geneva transplantation team has performed allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell (alloHSCT) with reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) and T cell depletion (TCD) to treat hematological malignancies for older or non fit for myeloablative conditioning patients. This is a new approach of engineering stem cell products that lowers the risk of GvHD while preserving graft versus leukemia (GvL) as much as possible. Patient and methods: We report a retrospective study of 73 patients who received alloHSCT with RIC and TCD between 2001-2013. The median age was 59 years (21-70), 60% were male. Disease at transplant time was acute leukaemia for 45%, Hodgkin lymphoma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma for 24%, myelodysplastic disorders for 13%, myeloproliferative disorders for 9,3 % and multiple myeloma for 8%. Source of stem cell was peripheral in 96% of the cases. 41% of the donors were matched related donor, 37% matched unrelated donor, 19% mismatched unrelated donor and 3% mistmatched related donor. The conditioning regimen consisted on fludarabine with busulfan or melphalan and ATG. Extensive T-cell depletion was done using Campath in the bag followed by washing procedures to remove free antibody. Fixed number of CD3+ T-cell addback was given on d+1 to preserve GvL with minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment and early donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) given if MRD positive. Doses of DLI were preserved and frozen at the time of stem cell harvest. GvHD prophylaxis was with ciclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil. Results: With a median follow up of 5 (0.5-11) years, the 5-year overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS), current disease free survival, relapse rate and non relapse mortality (NRM) were 41.7% (95%CI 30.7-53.7%), 38.8% (95%CI 28.8-50.8%), 39,5% (95%CI 27.7-51.7%), 45.3% (95%CI 32.7-57.2%) and 15.8% (95%CI 8.3-25.4%) respectively. The main cause of death was relapse 38.7 % followed by GvHD 17% and infection 1.3%. In this cohort, the cumulative incidence (CI) of acute GvHD was 15.1% (95% CI: 8.0-24.3%) as well as for acute GvHD grade II-IV. CI of chronic GvHD was 14.7% (95%CI:7.2-23.6%) with extensive chronic GvHD CI being 5.9% (95% CI: 1.9-13.4%). Five patients received DLI for relapses, 27 for mixed chimerism and 8 for both causes. The average number of DLI was 2. Twenty-eight patients entered CR, 4 PR and 13 did not respond to DLI. In univariate analysis, two factors GvHD before DLI and GvHD after first DLI have a tendency for favorable impact on OS respectively p=0.093 and 0.071. For DFS, two factors are significant: disease risk index and GvHD after first DLI respectively p=0.013 and 0.044. For NRM disease risk index is the only factor which is statistically significant p=0.005. For relapse no factors were significant. Discussion: Our study showed a lower rate of acute and chronic GvHD as compared to other studies with unmanipulated stem cells. However, we describe a high rate of relapse incidence and relapse mortality. We have found in univariate analysis two factors statistically significant for DFS GvHD before and after first DLI. Our cohort is a heterogeneous group with different diseases at different stages, which can explain those results. It’s a monocentric study and small number of patient can be a limit for this work. Of note, since 2009 we have changed our strategy introducing a day +100 preemptive DLI infusion in the absence of GvHD, with escalading doses of lymphocytes every 8 weeks up to 5x 107 CD3/kg in the absence of GvHD to improve response. We don’t have enough patients and follow up to draw any conclusion regarding this new strategy. To improve the outcomes, the selection of patients who may receive partial T-cell depletion should be refined, avoiding transplanting patients with high risk of relapse with this strategy. To help decision making, the revised disease risk index as presented by Armand et al. (Blood 2014;123:3664) may be useful. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 119 (10) ◽  
pp. 2409-2416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junya Kanda ◽  
Hiroh Saji ◽  
Takahiro Fukuda ◽  
Takeshi Kobayashi ◽  
Koichi Miyamura ◽  
...  

Abstract To clarify which is preferable, a related donor with an HLA-1 Ag mismatch at the HLA-A, HLA-B, or HLA-DR loci in the graft-versus-host (GVH) direction (RD/1AG-MM-GVH) or an HLA 8/8-allele (HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C, and HLA-DRB1)–matched unrelated donor (8/8-MUD), we evaluated 779 patients with acute leukemia, chronic myelogenous leukemia, or myelodysplastic syndrome who received a T cell–replete graft from an RD/1AG-MM-GVH or 8/8-MUD. The use of an RD/1AG-MM-GVH donor was significantly associated with a higher overall mortality rate than the use of an 8/8-MUD in a multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 1.49; P < .001), and this impact was statistically significant only in patients with standard-risk diseases (P = .001). Among patients with standard-risk diseases who received transplantation from an RD/1AG-MM-GVH donor, the presence of an HLA-B Ag mismatch was significantly associated with a lower overall survival rate than an HLA-DR Ag mismatch because of an increased risk of treatment-related mortality. The HLA-C Ag mismatch or multiple allelic mismatches were frequently observed in the HLA-B Ag-mismatched group, and were possibly associated with the poor outcome. In conclusion, an 8/8-MUD should be prioritized over an RD/1AG-MM-GVH donor during donor selection. In particular, an HLA-B Ag mismatch in the GVH direction has an adverse effect on overall survival and treatment-related mortality in patients with standard-risk diseases.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2162-2162
Author(s):  
Johannes Schetelig ◽  
Henning Baldauf ◽  
Carolin Massalski ◽  
Sandra Frank ◽  
Jürgen Sauter ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: A series of studies suggest that harnessing natural killer (NK) cell reactivity by killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor (KIR) genotype based unrelated donor selection could further improve outcome after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). A Receptor-Ligand model has been proposed for donor selection which aims at augmenting NK cell activation while minimizing inhibition. Information on education of KIR2DS1-positive NK cells (Venstrom et al, NEJM 2012) and the predicted Receptor-Ligand interaction of KIR3DL1-positive NK cells is utilized for this algorithm. By combining this information donors can be classified as KIR-advantageous or disadvantageous. Patients with donors, characterized by activating KIR2DS1 and weak/non-inhibiting KIR3DL1, experienced less relapse and improved survival compared to patients with donors, characterized by lacking an activating KIR2DS1 but presence of strong-inhibiting KIR3DL1. This study aimed at validating this predictor in an independent cohort of patients. Methods: Donor samples were retrieved from the Collaborative Biobank (Dresden, Germany) and mapped to patient outcome data extracted from the German Registry for Stem Cell transplantation. KIR typing was performed using a high resolution amplicon-based next generation sequencing method. KIR typing at the allele level was based on sequencing of exons 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, and 9. The patient population was restricted to patients with AML or MDS. Donor and patient mapping was cross-checked by HLA-typing of the donor sample. The impact of the predictor on overall survival was tested in a Cox regression model adjusted for patient age, a modified disease risk index, performance status, donor age, HLA-match, sex match, CMV match, conditioning intensity, type of T-cell depletion and graft type. Results: Clinical data from 2314 patients were analyzed. The median age at alloHCT was 59.4 years (range, 18.1 to 79.6 years). The indication for alloHCT was AML for 80% of patients and MDS for 20% of patients. Disease risk was assessed as low, intermediate, high or very high in 1%, 52%, 42%, and 5%, respectively. Patient and donor were 10/10 matched in 78% of pairs, whereas a one locus mismatch was reported for 21% of pairs. Myeloablative, reduced-intensity and non-myeloablative conditioning regimens were used in 29%, 67%, and 4% of patients, respectively. ATG was administered in 77% and alemtuzumab in 3% of patients. Twenty percent of patients received no T-cell depletion. In total, 535 patients experienced relapse and 945 patients died. This number of events translated into a power of the confirmatory analysis for the predictor of KIR2DS1 and KIR3DL1 of 67%. Two-year overall and event-free survival for the whole cohort was 51% (95%-CI 48% to 53%) and 44% (95%-CI 42% to 47%) and the 2-year incidence of relapse and non-relapse mortality was 28% (95%-CI 26% to 30%) for both endpoints. In univariate analysis, overall survival (54% versus 56%) and the cumulative incidence of relapse of patients with a KIR-advantageous donor were comparable to patients with KIR-disadvantageous donors. The adjusted hazard ratio from the multivariable Cox regression model for the comparison of patients with KIR-advantageous versus KIR-disadvantageous donors was 0.99 (Wald-test, p=0.95) for overall survival and 1.12 (Wald-test, p=0.41) for relapse incidence. When evaluated separately, the two components of the predictor (degree of inhibition by KIR3DL1 & presence of activating KIR2DS1) did not have an impact on overall survival or the incidence of relapse (see Figure). Also, evaluation of the combined predictor in subsets of patients by disease, type of T-cell depletion and HLA-compatibility did not allow prediction of these outcomes. Conclusions: Relapse incidence and overall survival after unrelated donor alloHCT could not be predicted using information on activating KIR2DS1 and inhibiting KIR3DL1 donor genes in an independent cohort of predominantly Caucasian patients. The predictor had been developed in a cohort of patients with AML who were younger and predominantly had received myeloablative conditioning based on total-body irradiation, ATG was administered less often, but donors often were only partially HLA-compatible. The different outcome in the current analysis thus points at potential interactions between NK-cell mediated allo-reactivity and procedural variations of alloHCT. Figure Figure. Disclosures Schetelig: Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Stelljes:Novartis: Honoraria; MSD: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; JAZZ: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Ayuk:Therakos (Mallinckrodt): Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy. Bethge:Neovii GmbH: Honoraria, Research Funding; Miltenyi Biotec GmbH: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Bug:Neovii: Other: Travel Grant; Novartis Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Other: Travel Grant; Celgene: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Astellas Pharma: Other: Travel Grant; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Travel Grant. Kobbe:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Travel Support, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Beelen:Medac: Consultancy, Other: Travel Support. Fleischhauer:GENDX: Research Funding.


2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (21) ◽  
pp. 2392-2398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ran Reshef ◽  
Austin P. Huffman ◽  
Amy Gao ◽  
Marlise R. Luskin ◽  
Noelle V. Frey ◽  
...  

Purpose To characterize the impact of graft T-cell composition on outcomes of reduced-intensity conditioned (RIC) allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (alloHSCT) in adults with hematologic malignancies. Patients and Methods We evaluated associations between graft T-cell doses and outcomes in 200 patients who underwent RIC alloHSCT with a peripheral blood stem-cell graft. We then studied 21 alloHSCT donors to identify predictors of optimal graft T-cell content. Results Higher CD8 cell doses were associated with a lower risk for relapse (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.43; P = .009) and improved relapse-free survival (aHR, 0.50; P = .006) and overall survival (aHR, 0.57; P = .04) without a significant increase in graft-versus-host disease or nonrelapse mortality. A cutoff level of 0.72 × 108 CD8 cells per kilogram optimally segregated patients receiving CD8hi and CD8lo grafts with differing overall survival (P = .007). Donor age inversely correlated with graft CD8 dose. Consequently, older donors were unlikely to provide a CD8hi graft, whereas approximately half of younger donors provided CD8hi grafts. Compared with recipients of older sibling donor grafts (consistently containing CD8lo doses), survival was significantly better for recipients of younger unrelated donor grafts with CD8hi doses (P = .03), but not for recipients of younger unrelated donor CD8lo grafts (P = .28). In addition, graft CD8 content could be predicted by measuring the proportion of CD8 cells in a screening blood sample from stem-cell donors. Conclusion Higher graft CD8 dose, which was restricted to young donors, predicted better survival in patients undergoing RIC alloHSCT.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 47-47
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Krieger ◽  
Rehan Qayyum ◽  
Amir Ahmed Toor

Killer immunoglobulin-like receptor (KIR) and KIR-ligand (KIRL) interactions play an important role in natural killer cell-mediated graft versus leukemia effect (GVL) after hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) for AML. There is considerable heterogeneity in the KIR gene and KIRL content of individuals, making it difficult to estimate the full clinical impact of NK cell alloreactivity following HCT. Herein, we validate a mathematical model accounting for KIR-KIRL interactions identifying donors with optimal NK cell-mediated alloreactivity and GVL. This retrospective study was performed on de-identified donor and recipient demographic and clinical outcomes data provided by the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR). Donor recipient pairs (DRP) who underwent unrelated donor (URD) HCT for early and intermediate AML were included. KIR-KIRL interaction values were assigned as follows; if an inhibitory KIR (iKIR) on the NK cell encounters a ligand on its target, this will give the NK cell an inhibitory signal and this is scored as a single interaction(Figure 1b), as is the case, if there is no ligand for an inhibitory KIR, i.e., missing KIRL (mKIRL) (Figure 1c). Finally, activating KIR (aKIR) interacting with its ligands is similarly scored(Figure 1a). The absolute values of the iKIR and mKIR scores were summed to calculate the composite inhibitory-missing ligand (IM)-KIR score (Figure 1d). The study cohort was comprised of 2365 donor-recipient pairs (DRP) who underwent URD HCT for early or intermediate AML. Mean age was 53 years; 85% of DRPs were high-resolution 8/8 HLA-matched for HLA-A, -B, -C, and -DRB1. All patients received T cell replete grafts; 42% (n=996) received in vivo T cell depletion, 937 (94%) with anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG); 86% received a graft of mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC), 59% received myeloablative conditioning. This cohort was primarily of Caucasian descent (89%). When adjusted for recipient age, donor age, CMV status, KPS, GVHD prophylaxis, cytogenetics, disease status, conditioning regimen, in vivo T cell depletion, graft source, and sex match, relapse risk was significantly reduced in donor-recipient pairs (DRP) with higher inhibitory KIR-KIRL interaction and missing KIRL (mKIR) scores, with HR=0.86 (P=0.01) & HR=0.84 (P=0.02) respectively. This effect was not observed with activating KIR-KIRL interactions. Chronic GVHD and TRM were not significantly affected by iKIR, mKIR or aKIR. Given the significant individual impact of iKIR and mKIR, the summed inhibitory-missing ligand (IM-KIR) score was next assessed, and when this score was 5 (as opposed to &lt;5), the IM-KIR score was also associated with lower relapse risk, HR 0.8 (P=0.004) (Figure 2a). Acute and chronic graft vs. host disease (GVHD), survival, GRFS, and relapse-free survival were not significantly different, likely due to increased TRM among these patients, HR 1.32 (P=0.01). Interaction analysis indicated that amongst the HLA matched DRP, ATG recipients with IM-KIR=5, had a lower relapse rate compared to those with an IM-KIR&lt;5, HR 0.61 (p=0.001) (Figure 2b), among the cohort who did not receive ATG there was no significant difference in relapse among IM-KIR=5 and IM-KIR&lt;5; thus, the use of ATG significantly modified the effect of IM KIR score in an interaction analysis (p=0.049), suggesting higher NK cell magnitude of KIR-KIRL interaction may compensate for the general increase of relapse in those who receive in vivo T cell depletion. Nevertheless, TRM was also increased in these patients, HR 1.49 (p=0.034), likely abrogating survival advantage from a lower relapse risk. This large international study confirms that unrelated DRPs with greater magnitude of inhibitory KIR-KIRL interactions confer significant relapse protection after MUD HCT in standard-risk AML. This challenges the notion that KIR are irrelevant to donor selection. Future clinical trials evaluating donor selection for URD HCT should include this measure to evaluate its value prospectively in uniformly treated patient cohorts, with adequate GVHD and antiviral prophylaxis to mitigate TRM. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document