scholarly journals Nonneutralizing FVIII-specific antibody signatures in patients with Hemophilia A and in healthy donors

Author(s):  
Helmut Schweiger ◽  
Judit Rejtő ◽  
Christoph J Hofbauer ◽  
Verena Berg ◽  
Peter Allacher ◽  
...  

Previous studies identified nonneutralizing FVIII-specific antibodies in the circulation of severe and non-severe hemophilia A patients without FVIII inhibitors and also in some healthy individuals. To gain a better understanding of the nature of these nonneutralizing antibody responses, we analyzed and compared anti-FVIII antibody signatures in three study cohorts - previously treated severe as well as non-severe hemophilia A patients without FVIII inhibitors, and healthy donors. FVIII-binding IgM, IgG1-4 and IgA antibodies were differentiated, FVIII-specificity was assessed and associated apparent affinity constants were determined. Our results indicate that the nonneutralizing FVIII-specific antibody response in all study cohorts is dominated by IgG1 and IgA. Prevalences, titers and affinities of these nonneutralizing antibodies were higher in the hemophilia A cohorts than in healthy donors. Stratification for the anti-HCV antibody status demonstrated the presence of FVIII-specific IgA with elevated titers in severe hemophilia A patients with an active or past HCV infection when compared to HCV antibody positive non-severe patients or HCV antibody negative patients and healthy donors. Increased titers and affinities of FVIII-specific IgG1 antibodies were observed in a considerable number of hemophilia A patients as opposed to healthy subjects independently of the patients' anti-HCV antibody status. Overall, our findings support the hypothesis that the generation of nonneutralizing anti-FVIII antibodies in healthy individuals and in non-inhibitor hemophilia A patients might be based on similar immune mechanisms. However, differences in prevalences, titers and affinities of these antibodies indicate distinct differences in the antibody evolution between healthy individuals and patients.

Blood ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 82 (8) ◽  
pp. 2452-2461 ◽  
Author(s):  
JG Gilles ◽  
J Arnout ◽  
J Vermylen ◽  
JM Saint-Remy

Abstract A significant proportion of hemophilia A patients receiving transfusions of factor VIII (FVIII) develop a specific antibody response towards FVIII. These antibodies are usually detected by assays in which they inhibit the function of the molecule, such as the Bethesda clotting test. We have prepared anti-FVIII antibodies by specific immunoadsorption from the plasma of four hemophiliacs with stable inhibitor levels. The isotypic distribution of such antibodies was determined and their capacity to bind to insolubilized FVIII was compared with their inhibitory activity in two functional assays, namely, the Bethesda assay and a chromogenic assay. In addition, the FVIII epitope specificity was determined by competition with monoclonal antibodies for the binding to insolubilized FVIII. We show here that (1) anti-FVIII antibodies are not isotypically restricted; thus, a significant proportion of specific IgG2 was found; (2) antibodies are frequently directed towards epitopes of FVIII that are not directly involved in the function of the molecule and therefore escape detection in the Bethesda method or chromogenic assay; and (3) each patient shows a unique pattern of FVIII epitope recognition. We conclude that evaluation of anti-FVIII antibodies by a functional method does not provide an accurate evaluation of the specific antibody response. These findings have important implications for the comparison of the immunogenicity of FVIII molecules produced by different technologies and for the development of methods to control anti-FVIII antibody production.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 3596-3596
Author(s):  
Anna Klukowska ◽  
Martina Jansen ◽  
Vladimir Komrska ◽  
Pawel Laguna ◽  
Vladimir Vdovin ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Octanate is a highly purified, double virus inactivated, human plasma-derived factor VIII (FVIII) concentrate with all coagulation FVIII bound to its natural stabilizer VWF in a VWF:RCo/FVIII:C ratio of approximately 0.4. Five prospective GCP studies with octanate were conducted in 77 previously treated patients (PTPs) with severe hemophilia A. None of these 77 PTPs developed an inhibitor while treated exclusively with octanate. Aim To assess the immunogenicity in previously untreated patients (PUPs), a prospective clinical trial has been initiated in 2000. This included 50 PUPs with severe hemophilia A for an observational period of 100 exposure days with octanate, for at least 6 months. Methods Patients with severe hemophilia A without previous exposure to FVIII or FVIII-containing products were enrolled. Efficacy and tolerability were assessed by a 4-point verbal rating scale. Inhibitors were assessed according to modified Bethesda method prior to treatment every 3-4 exposure days (ED 1-20), and after treatment every 10 EDs (ED 21-100), but at minimum every three months. Results Two of 50 (4%) subjects developed clinically relevant inhibitor titers over the course of the study. Another two displayed inhibitors that disappeared spontaneously without change of dose or dosing interval. All inhibitors developed under on-demand treatment and before ED 50. From the 50 subjects, 42 had exceeded 50 EDs at the time of this analysis. Octanate was well-tolerated and the adverse event profile was consistent with the population studied. The hemostatic efficacy in prophylaxis and treatment of bleeding episodes was generally rated as “excellent” and no complication was reported for any surgical treatment. Conclusion Despite frequent inhibitor testing and predominant on-demand treatment, the data indicate a low overall inhibitor rate for octanate in patients who exceeded 50 exposure days (4/42) of which only 2 (4.8%) were clinically relevant. Disclosures: Klukowska: Octapharma AG: Investigator Other. Jansen:Octapharma AG: Employment. Komrska:Octapharma AG: Investigator Other. Laguna:Octapharma AG: Investigator Other. Vdovin:Octapharma AG: Investigator Other. Knaub:Octapharma AG: Employment.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 2594-2594
Author(s):  
Frank Michael Horling ◽  
Peter Allacher ◽  
Herwig Koppensteiner ◽  
Werner Engl ◽  
Fritz Scheiflinger ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and objectives BAX 855 (Antihemophilic Factor [Recombinant] pegylated, rurioctocog alfa pegol) is an extended half-life (EHL) recombinant human coagulation factor VIII (rFVIII) modified with polyethylene glycol (PEG) (Turecek et al., 2012). It was recently approved in the US and Japan for on-demand treatment of bleeding events and for prophylactic treatment for patients with congenital severe hemophilia A. The efficacy and safety of BAX 855 were extensively studied during clinical development of this compound (Konkle et al., 2015). The assessment of BAX855 immunogenicity was of particular interest because the development of neutralizing antibodies (FVIII inhibitors) is the most serious complication following replacement therapies with FVIII products. FVIII inhibitors develop in about 20-32% of previously untreated patients (Gouw SC et al., 2013) and with a rate of 1.55- 3.8 per 1000 patients per year in previously treated patients (Kempton CL, 2010) with severe hemophilia A. To fully understand the potential of BAX855 to induce antibody responses, both FVIII inhibitors and total FVIII-binding antibodies were assessed. Furthermore, potential antibody development against PEG-FVIII, PEG and CHO proteins was investigated. Methods The clinical protocols (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02585960, NCT02210091, NCT01736475, NCT01913405, NCT01945593, NCT01599819, NCT02615691) and the methods used for antibody analytics (Whelan et al 2013; Lubich et al 2016) were previously described. ELISA technologies were used for the analysis of total binding antibodies, the Nijmegen modification of the Bethesda assay was used for the detection of FVIII inhibitors. Correlation analyses were done to assess any potential correlation between the development of antibodies and potential adverse events. Results None of the 243 subjects (6 PUPs and 237 PTPs) included in the analysis developed FVIII inhibitors (≥ 0.6 BU/mL) A total of 44 subjects tested positive for binding antibodies against FVIII, PEG-FVIII or PEG at single time points. 28 of these 44 subjects showed pre-existing antibodies against FVIII, PEG-FVIII, or PEG prior to first exposure to BAX 855, which disappeared during the study. 13 subjects who tested negative at screening developed transient antibodies against FVIII, PEG-FVIII, or PEG at one or two consecutive study visits after exposure to BAX 855. Antibodies were transient and not detectable at subsequent visits or at completion of the study. Five subjects showed positive results for binding antibodies at study completion or at the time of the data cutoff. No conclusion can be drawn whether these antibodies are of transient or persistent nature. There was no confirmed causal relationship between the appearance of binding antibodies against FVIII, PEG or PEG-FVIII and adverse events, nor was there an impact on hemostatic efficacy in any of the 44subjects. No subject had pre-existing antibodies or developed de novo antibodies to CHO proteins during the study at any time point. Conclusion Our data indicate that BAX855 did not show an increased risk for PTPs to develop FVIII inhibitors. We did not see any FVIII inhibitor development in PUPs, but the small number of overall exposures does not allow general conclusions for PUPs. Importantly, the data suggest that BAX855 did not induce immune responses associated with impaired treatment efficacy or with altered PK parameters. Disclosures Horling: Shire: Employment. Allacher:IMC Krems: Research Funding. Koppensteiner:Shire: Employment. Engl:Shire, formerly Baxalta and Baxter: Employment, Equity Ownership. Scheiflinger:Shire: Employment, Research Funding. Abbuehl:Baxalta (now part of Shire): Employment. Reipert:Shire: Employment.


F1000Research ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 1049
Author(s):  
Bendix Samarta Witarto ◽  
Visuddho Visuddho ◽  
Andro Pramana Witarto ◽  
Henry Sutanto ◽  
Bayu Satria Wiratama ◽  
...  

Background: Patients with severe hemophilia often present with painful joint and soft tissue bleeding which may restrict them from their daily activities. The current standard of care still relies on a regular prophylactic factor VIII (FVIII), which has a high daily treatment burden. Recently, rurioctocog alfa pegol, a third-generation recombinant FVIII with a modification in its polyethylene glycol (PEG) component, has been developed. Several trials have studied this synthetic drug as bleeding prophylaxis in severe hemophilia A. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of rurioctocog alfa pegol for previously treated patients with severe hemophilia A. Methods: This study was conducted in conformity with the PRISMA guidelines. Data were retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Wiley Online Library, and CINAHL (via EBSCOhost). Study qualities were assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) and Modified Jadad scales. Results: Four studies involving 517 previously treated severe hemophilia A patients were included in this study. The pooled mean of total annualized bleeding rate (ABR) and hemostatic efficacy was 2.59 (95% CI = 2.04–3.14) and 92% (95% CI = 85%–97%), respectively. Only 30 (2.3%) non-serious and one (1.4%) serious adverse events were considered related to rurioctocog alfa pegol treatment. At the end of the studies, no development of FVIII inhibitory antibodies was observed. None of the developed binding antibodies to FVIII, PEG-FVIII, or PEG was correlated to the treatment efficacy and safety. Conclusions: Despite the limited availability of direct comparison studies, our analyses indicate that rurioctocog alfa pegol could serve as a safe and effective alternative for bleeding prophylaxis in previously treated hemophilia A patients. Moreover, it appears to have low immunogenicity, which further increases the safety profile of the drug in such clinical conditions.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2472-2472
Author(s):  
Marijke Van den Berg ◽  
Kathelijn Fischer ◽  
Elena Santagostino ◽  
Herve Chambost ◽  
Karin Kurnik ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction.In patients with hemophilia treated with factor VIII products, the development of inhibitory antibodies poses the largest safety risk. Especially during the first 50 exposure days (EDs), up to 37% of patients with severe hemophilia A have been reported to develop an inhibitor. To study neo-immunogenicity of products and new treatment strategies, patients have been distinguished into previously untreated (PUPs) and previously treated patients (PTPs); the latter defined as patients treated for more than 150 EDs. The number of 150 EDs was established in the eighties during a time when most patients received on-demand treatment and testing for inhibitors was not frequently performed. More recent studies on inhibitor incidence in PUPs with severe hemophilia A report that 50% of inhibitors develop within 14-15 EDs, however the cut-off number of EDs for a PUP to become a PTP is not well defined. The aim of this study was to define the number of EDs for PUPs to become PTPs based on long-term follow-up of patients with severe hemophilia A Methods.All patients with severe hemophilia A born after January 1, 2000, treated for at least 1 ED and followed prospectively until inhibitor development or the number of EDs at last follow-up, were included. The number of EDs at inhibitor development is the last exposure day before the first positive titer was reported. An inhibitor was defined as positive when at least two positive inhibitor titers were measured. Positivity was defined according to the cut-off level in each individual center's laboratory. Results.Of 1,038 PUPs with severe hemophilia A, 930 (89.6%) were followed until 75 EDs, 429 until 500 EDs and 212 until 1000 EDs. In total, 300 inhibitors developed, of which 298 (99.3%) within the first 75 EDs. Thereafter only two inhibitors developed, both low titer: after 249 and 264 EDs. Conclusion.Almost all inhibitors develop during the first 75 EDs. Patients with severe hemophilia A can be defined as PTP after 75 instead of 150 exposure days. A change of definition of PTP will increase the number of severe hemophilia A patients eligible for new therapies. Disclosures Santagostino: Bioverativ: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kedrion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sobi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novo Nordisk: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CSL Behring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Grifols: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Octapharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Male:SOBI: Speakers Bureau; Shire: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Octapharma: Speakers Bureau; Novo Nordisk: Speakers Bureau; Biotest: Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; CSL Behring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Oldenburg:Novo Nordisk: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Octapharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Shire: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Biogen Idec: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Chugai: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Grifols: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Biotest: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Swedish Orphan Biovitrum: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Liesner:Baxalta: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sobi: Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Octapharma: Consultancy, Other: Clinical study investigator for NuProtect Study (Octapharma sponsored), Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Carcao:Shire: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Octapharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Grifols: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; CSL-Behring: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; LFB: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bioverativ/Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Biotest: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Nolan:CSL Behring: Research Funding; Sobi: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding. Álvarez-Roman:Shire: Consultancy; NovoNordisk: Consultancy; SOBI: Consultancy. Koenigs:Gilead: Research Funding; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Intersero: Research Funding; Bioverativ: Consultancy; Roche/Chugai: Consultancy; EU (IMI, FP7): Research Funding; Sobi: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Shire: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Biotest: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Jansen: Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4672-4672 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian-Ming Gu ◽  
Chandra Patel ◽  
Katalin Kauser

Abstract BAY 1093884 is a fully human monoclonal antibody against tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) developed as a potential bypass agent for patients with hemophilia with or without inhibitors. It restores insufficient thrombin burst, leading to stable clot formation in hemophilic conditions in vitro, and effectively stops bleeding in vivo. TFPI is a potent inhibitor of factor Xa (FXa) and the factor VIIa tissue factor complex in the extrinsic pathway. The majority of TFPI is associated with vascular endothelial cells. The mean plasma TFPI concentration in healthy individuals is ~70 ng/mL (1.6 nM) and about 80% of the circulating TFPI is bound to lipoproteins [Dahm, et al. Blood. 2003;101(11):4387-4392; Broze,et al. Front Biosci. 2012;17:262-280]. Some reports indicate that patients with hemophilia B have lower free TFPI levels than patients with hemophilia A, irrespective of phenotypic severity (Tardy-Poncet, et al. Haemophilia 2011;17:312-313). The objective of this study is to determine the plasma TFPI concentration in healthy donors and patients with hemophilia by a newly developed functional TFPI capture assay and to evaluate this assay with inhibition of TFPI by anti-TFPI neutralizing antibody (BAY 1093884) in vitro. A quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using FXa as capture agent was developed and validated to measure TFPI levels in human plasma. The assay shows very good precision, accuracy, and reproducibility and should capture all coagulation-relevant forms of TFPI from plasma. Plasma TFPI was determined in 30 healthy donors (15 males and 15 females) and 30 patients with severe hemophilia (hemophilia A [n=12], hemophilia A with inhibitors [n=9], hemophilia B [n=9]). The plasma TFPI levels (mean ± SD) in healthy individuals, patients with severe hemophilia A without and with inhibitors, and severe hemophilia B were 59.5±18.4 ng/mL, 62.9±14.6 ng/mL, 47.3±4.3 ng/mL, and 68.1±8.8 ng/mL, respectively (Table 1). No statistical differences were found based on sex or race (Hispanic, African American, white) in the healthy population and between patients with hemophilia with and without inhibitors. TFPI levels were also not affected by addition of corn trypsin inhibitor (CTI) in citrate plasma. Furthermore, the concentration that inhibits 50% of TFPI levels (IC50) of anti-TFPI antibody (BAY 1093884) was determined to be 4.76 nM in normal human plasma using this assay. In conclusion,plasma TFPI does not appear to be affected by sex or race in healthy subjects, or the deficiency of factor VIII or IX in patients with hemophilia. The functional TFPI capture assay could potentially be used as a pharmacodynamic marker for monitoring plasma TFPI levels after the administration of anti-TFPI antibody and guide dosing strategies. Table 1. Plasma TFPI Levels in Healthy Subjects and Patients With Severe Hemophilia A and B HealthyHuman Donors(n=30) SevereHem A(n=12) Severe Hem AWith inhibitors(n=9) SevereHem B(n=9) TFPI, ng/mL Mean ± SD 59.5±18.4 62.9±14.6 47.3±4.3 68.1±8.8 Hem=hemophilia; TFPI=tissue factor pathway inhibitor. Disclosures Gu: Bayer HealthCare: Employment. Patel:Bayer HealthCare: Employment. Kauser:Bayer HealthCare LLC: Employment.


2019 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 198-203
Author(s):  
Chur Woo You ◽  
Hee Jo Baek ◽  
Sang Kyu Park ◽  
Young Shil Park ◽  
Ho-Jin Shin ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 113 (11) ◽  
pp. 2587-2594 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jolanta Krudysz-Amblo ◽  
Behnaz Parhami-Seren ◽  
Saulius Butenas ◽  
Kathleen E. Brummel-Ziedins ◽  
Edward D. Gomperts ◽  
...  

The presence of antibodies (Abs) in hemophilia A patients can potentially influence the therapeutic qualities of factor VIII (fVIII) administration. Much work has been focused on the presence of inhibitory antibodies, whereas the quantitation of noninhibitory anti-fVIII antibodies has been largely undetermined. Our objective was to develop a sensitive and specific fluorescence-based immunoassay (FLI) for the quantitation of anti-fVIIIAbs in human plasma. Affinity-purified human anti-fVIIIAb, isolated from a hemophilia A subject, was used as a calibrator with a detectability limit of 40 (±1.5) pM. The calibrator and the human plasma anti-fVIIIAb were captured on recombinant fVIII (rfVIII)– coupled microspheres and probed with mouse anti–human Ig–R-phycoerythrin. Plasma samples from 150 healthy donors and 39 inhibitor-negative hemophilia A subjects were compared with 4 inhibitor-positive hemophilia A plasma samples with inhibitor titers of 1 BU/mL (94.6 ± 0.8 nM), 11 BU/mL (214.3 ± 7.1 nM), 106 BU/mL (2209.4 ± 84.9 nM), 140 BU/mL (2417.7 ± 3.8 nM) as measured by the Nijmegen method. We also describe the validation of a mouse anti–human fVIIIAb as a surrogate calibrator. Four healthy individuals (3%) showed detectable anti-fVIIIAb in the range of 0.6 to 6.2 nM, whereas 13 (33%) of the 39 inhibitor-free hemophilia A subjects were positive for anti-fVIIIAb in the range of 0.5 to 20 nM. The method may be useful for therapeutic management of hemophilia A patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document