scholarly journals Bronchodilator reversibility in asthma and COPD: findings from three large population studies

2019 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 1900561 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christer Janson ◽  
Andrei Malinovschi ◽  
Andre F.S. Amaral ◽  
Simone Accordini ◽  
Jean Bousquet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Population Studies ◽  
Large Population ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Airway Disease ◽  
Forced Expiratory Volume ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Phenotypic Marker ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Bronchodilator Response ◽  
Obstructive Airway Diseases

Bronchodilator response (BDR) testing is used as a diagnostic method in obstructive airway diseases. The aim of this investigation was to compare different methods for measuring BDR in participants with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and to study to the extent to which BDR was related to symptom burden and phenotypic characteristics.Forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) were measured before and 15 min after 200 μg of salbutamol in 35 628 subjects aged ≥16 years from three large international population studies. The subjects were categorised in three groups: current asthma (n=2833), COPD (n=1146) and no airway disease (n=31 649). Three definitions for flow-related reversibility (increase in FEV1) and three for volume-related reversibility (increase in FVC) were used.The prevalence of bronchodilator reversibility expressed as increase FEV1 ≥12% and 200 mL was 17.3% and 18.4% in participants with asthma and COPD, respectively, while the corresponding prevalence was 5.1% in those with no airway disease. In asthma, bronchodilator reversibility was associated with wheeze (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.04–1.79), atopy (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.04–1.79) and higher exhaled nitric oxide fraction, while in COPD neither flow- nor volume-related bronchodilator reversibility was associated with symptom burden, exacerbations or health status after adjusting for pre-bronchodilator FEV1.Bronchodilator reversibility was at least as common in participants with COPD as those with asthma. This indicates that measures of reversibility are of limited value for distinguishing asthma from COPD in population studies. However, in asthma, bronchodilator reversibility may be a phenotypic marker.

Clinical Characterization of Nursing Facility Residents With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 248-257
Author(s):  
H. Edward Davidson ◽  
Peter Radlowski ◽  
Lisa Han ◽  
Theresa I. Shireman ◽  
Carole Dembek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Forced Expiratory Volume ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Nursing Facility ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Medication Delivery

OBJECTIVE AND DESIGN: To describe clinical characteristics, medication use, and low peak inspiratory flow rate (PIFR) (< 60 L/min) prevalence in nursing facility residents with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). PATIENTS AND SETTING: Residents 60 years of age and older with a COPD diagnosis and≥ 6 months' nursing facility residence, were enrolled between December 2017 and February 2019 from 26 geographically varied United States nursing facilities. OUTCOME MEASURES: Data, extracted from residents' charts, included demographic/clinical characteristics, COPD-related medications, exacerbations and hospitalizations within the past 6 months, and functional status from the most recent Minimum Data Set. At enrollment, residents completed the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) Dyspnea Scale and COPD Assessment Test (CAT™). Spirometry and PIFR were also assessed. RESULTS: Residents' (N = 179) mean age was 78.0 ± 10.6 years, 63.7% were female, and 57.0% had low PIFR. Most prevalent comorbidities were hypertension (79.9%), depression (49.2%), and heart failure (41.9%). The average forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV11) % predicted was 45.9% ± 20.9%. On the CAT, 78.2% scored≥ 10 and on the mMRC Dyspnea Scale, 74.1% scored≥ 2, indicating most residents had high COPD symptom burden. Only 49.2% were receiving a scheduled long-acting bronchodilator (LABD). Among those with low PIFR prescribed a LABD, > 80% used dry powder inhalers for medication delivery. CONCLUSION: This study highlights underutilization of scheduled LABD therapy in nursing facility residents with COPD. Low PIFR was prevalent in residents while the majority used suboptimal medication delivery devices. The findings highlight opportunities for improving management and outcomes for nursing facility residents with COPD.

scholarly journals Treatable traits in an English cohort: Prevalence and predictors of future decline in lung function and quality of life in COPD

2021 ◽  
pp. 00934-2020
Author(s):  
Muhammad Rehan Sarwar ◽  
Vanessa Marie McDonald ◽  
Michael John Abramson ◽  
Eldho Paul ◽  
Johnson George
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Lung Function ◽  
Precision Medicine ◽  
Airway Disease ◽  
Forced Expiratory Volume ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Lifestyle Risk Factors ◽  
The Core

Background“Treatable traits (TTs)” is a precision medicine approach for facilitating multidimensional assessment of every patient with chronic airway disease to determine the core traits associated with disease outcomes, where targeted treatments are applied.ObjectivesTo determine the prevalence of TTs in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and which traits predict future decline in lung function and quality of life (QoL).MethodsA 4 year longitudinal evaluation was conducted using data from 3726 participants in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA). TTs were identified based on published recommendations. Traits that predicted decline in lung function and QoL were analysed using generalised estimating equations.ResultsOverall, 21 TTs, including pulmonary (n=5), extra-pulmonary (n=13) and behavioural/lifestyle risk-factors (n=3) were identified. In multivariate analyses, traits of chronic bronchitis (β=−0.186; 95%CI=−0.290 to −0.082), breathlessness (β=−0.093; 95%CI=−0.164 to −0.022), underweight (β=−0.216; 95%CI=−0.373 to −0.058), sarcopaenia (β=−0.162; 95%CI=−0.262 to −0.061), and current smoking (β=−0.228; 95%CI=−0.304 to −0.153), predicted decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1). Of the seven traits that predicted decline in QoL, depression (β=−7.19; 95%CI=−8.81 to −5.57) and poor family and social support (β=−5.12; 95%CI=−6.65 to −3.59) were the strongest.ConclusionThe core TTs of COPD associated with a decline in lung function and QoL were identified. Targeting these impactful traits and individualised treatment using a precision medicine approach may improve outcomes in people with COPD.

Prevalence of Asthma-COPD Overlap in COPD and Severe Asthma Cohorts

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyonsoo Joo ◽  
So-Young Park ◽  
So Young Park ◽  
Seo Young Park ◽  
Sang-Heon Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Severe Asthma ◽  
Eosinophil Count ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Forced Expiratory Volume ◽  
Smoking History ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Blood Eosinophil ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Blood Eosinophil Count ◽  
Bronchodilator Response

Abstract Background: Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are airway diseases with similar clinical manifestations, despite differences in pathophysiology. Asthma-COPD overlap (ACO) is a condition characterized by overlapping clinical features of both diseases. There have been few reports regarding the prevalence of ACO in COPD and severe asthma cohorts. ACO is heterogeneous; patients can be classified on the basis of phenotype differences. This study was performed to analyze the prevalence of ACO in COPD and severe asthma cohorts. In addition, this study compared baseline characteristics among ACO patients according to phenotype.Methods: Patients with COPD were prospectively enrolled into the Korean COPD subgroup study (KOCOSS) cohort. Patients with severe asthma were prospectively enrolled into the Korean Severe Asthma Registry (KoSAR). ACO was defined in accordance with the updated Spanish criteria. In the COPD cohort, ACO was defined as bronchodilator response (BDR) ≥ 15% and ≥ 400 mL from baseline or blood eosinophil count ≥ 300 cells/μL. In the severe asthma cohort, ACO was defined as age ≥ 35 years, smoking ≥ 10 pack-years, and post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s/forced vital capacity < 0.7. Patients with ACO were divided into four groups according to smoking history (threshold: 20 pack-years) and blood eosinophil count (threshold: 300 cells/μL).Results: The prevalence of ACO significantly differed between the COPD and severe asthma cohorts (19.8% [365/1839] vs. 12.5% [104/832], respectively, P < 0.001). The numbers of patients in each group were as follows: Group A (smoking 10–20 pack-years and blood eosinophil count ≥ 300 cells/μL), 42 (9.1%); Group B (smoking 10–20 pack-years and eosinophil count < 300 cells/μL), 17 (3.7%); Group C (smoking ≥ 20 pack-years and eosinophil count ≥ 300 cells/μL), 341 (73.8%); and Group D (smoking ≥ 20 pack-years and eosinophil count < 300 cells/μL), 62 (13.4%). Age, sex, BDR, comorbidities, and medications significantly differed among the four groups.Conclusion: The prevalence of ACO differed between COPD and severe asthma cohorts. ACO patients can be classified into four phenotype groups, such that each phenotype exhibits distinct characteristics.

Asthma und COPD: Bronchodilatation durch nasale High-Flow-Therapie

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 210-211
Author(s):  
Peter Haidl
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Delivery ◽  
Air Entrainment ◽  
Forced Expiratory Volume ◽  
Nasal Cannula ◽  
Dose Titration ◽  
Dose Inhaler ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Moderate Asthma ◽  
Bronchodilator Response

Background: There has been increasing interest in transnasal pulmonary aerosol administration, but the dose-response relationship has not been reported. Objectives: To determine the accumulative bronchodilator dose at which patients with stable mild-to-moderate asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) achieve similar spirometry responses before and after bronchodilator tests using albuterol via a metered dose inhaler with a valved holding chamber (MDI + VHC). Method: Adult patients who met ATS/ERS criteria for bronchodilator responses in pulmonary function laboratory were recruited and consented to participate. After a washout period, patients received escalating doubling dosages (0.5, 1, 2, and 4 mg) of albuterol in a total volume of 2 mL delivered by vibrating mesh nebulizer via a nasal cannula at 37 °C with a flow rate of 15–20 L/min using a Venturi air entrainment device. Spirometry was measured at baseline and after each dose. Titration was stopped when an additional forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) improvement was < 5%. Results: 42 patients (16 males) with stable mild-to-moderate asthma (n = 29) and COPD (n = 13) were enrolled. FEV1 increment after a cumulative dose of 1.5 mg of albuterol via nasal cannula at 15–20 L/min was similar to 4 actuations of MDI + VHC (0.34 ± 0.18 vs. 0.34 ± 0.12 L, p = 0.878). Using ATS/ERS criteria of the bronchodilator test, 33.3% (14/42) and 69% (29/42) of patients responded to 0.5 and 1.5 mg of albuterol, respectively. Conclusions: With a nasal cannula at 15–20 L/min, transnasal pulmonary delivery of 1.5 mg albuterol resulted in similar bronchodilator response as 4 actuations of MDI + VHC.

Longer Duration of Palliative Care in Patients With COPD Is Associated With Death Outside the Hospital

2019 ◽  
pp. 082585971985148
Author(s):  
Valeri Kraskovsky ◽  
Jaclyn Schneider ◽  
M. Jeffery Mador ◽  
Karin A. Provost
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Disease Burden ◽  
Airflow Obstruction ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Forced Expiratory Volume ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Comorbid Disease ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Background: Patients with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have a significant symptom burden despite maximal medical therapy, yet few are referred for concomitant palliative care. Objective: To evaluate the utilization and impact of palliative care on the location of death and to identify clinical variables associated with palliative care contact. Design: Retrospective chart review from 2010 to 2016 at the VA Western New York Healthcare System using ICD-9/10 diagnosis of COPD. Palliative care contact was identified by Z51.5 or stop code 353. Results: Only 0.5% to 2% of living patients received palliative care, increasing abruptly at death (6%). Lower diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) (greater emphysema) was associated with palliative care contact, independent of comorbid disease burden or age. Initial outpatient contact was associated with a longer duration of palliative care ( P = .003) and death in a home-like setting. Outpatient palliative care was associated with more severe airflow obstruction (forced expiratory volume in 1 second, percent predicted [FEV1%]), whereas greater disease exacerbation frequency was associated with inpatient contact. COPD patients not referred to palliative care had a greater comorbid disease burden, similar FEV1%, fewer disease exacerbations, and a greater DLCO. Conclusion: Few patients with COPD received palliative care, similar to national trends. Initial outpatient palliative contact had the longest duration of care and death in the preferred home environment. The extent of emphysema (DLCO reduction) and more frequent disease exacerbations identified in patients were more likely to receive palliative care. Our study begins to define the benefits of palliative care in advanced COPD and confirms underutilization in the years before death, where a prolonged impact on the quality of life may be realized.

scholarly journals A Randomized Trial to Evaluate the Sustained Efficacy of a Mucus Clearance Device in Ambulatory Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

2004 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 567-572 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norman Wolkove ◽  
Marc A Baltzan ◽  
Hany Kamel ◽  
Michael Rotaple
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Exercise Performance ◽  
Forced Expiratory Volume ◽  
Ambulatory Setting ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Baseline Measure ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Bronchodilator Response ◽  
Mucus Clearance

OBJECTIVE:To determine whether a mucus clearance device (MCD) (Flutter; Axcan Scandipharm, USA) could consistently improve the bronchodilator response and exercise performance in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) when used in an ambulatory setting over a one-week period.SUBJECTS:Fifteen patients with severe COPD (mean age 71±10 years) were studied.METHODS:A randomized crossover design compared an MCD with a sham MCD (SMCD), in which each were tested for one week. At the beginning and end of each study week, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) were measured before and after MCD or SMCD. A bronchodilator aerosol (ipratropium bromide and salbutamol sulphate) was then given, and FEV1and FVC were remeasured 30 min, 60 min and 120 min later. A 6 min walk test (6MWT) was also performed.RESULTS:FEV1improved significantly (P<0.05) after bronchodilator administration with both the SMCD and MCD. The improvement was always greater with MCD use than with SMCD. At the baseline measure, 120 min postbronchodilator administration, the mean FEV1improved by 24±24% with SMCD use and 60±28% with MCD use (P<0.05). After one week of use, the corresponding values at 120 min were 19±24% and 43±26% (P<0.05). Similar findings were obtained for FVC. 6MWT distances increased by 29±12 m (P<0.05) after one week of MCD use, whereas it decreased slightly (by 16±18 m) after SMCD. The decline in saturation with the 6MWT was smaller with MCD use than with SMCD use. After one week, the decline in saturation with MCD use was similar to baseline levels, although patients were walking farther. After one week, dyspnea was lower on walking with MCD use than with SMCD use.CONCLUSION:Patients with COPD had an increased response to bronchodilator therapy after use of the MCD compared with SMCD use. The increase persisted after one week of use, and was associated with improved exercise performance as measured by the 6MWT.

scholarly journals Lung microbiota associations with clinical features of COPD in the SPIROMICS cohort

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristopher Opron ◽  
Lesa A. Begley ◽  
John R. Erb-Downward ◽  
Christine Freeman ◽  
Siddharth Madapoosi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Features ◽  
Flow Rate ◽  
Functional Impairment ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Airway Disease ◽  
Lavage Fluid ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Disease Heterogeneity ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Expiratory Flow

AbstractChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is heterogeneous in development, progression, and phenotypes. Little is known about the lung microbiome, sampled by bronchoscopy, in milder COPD and its relationships to clinical features that reflect disease heterogeneity (lung function, symptom burden, and functional impairment). Using bronchoalveolar lavage fluid collected from 181 never-smokers and ever-smokers with or without COPD (GOLD 0-2) enrolled in the SubPopulations and InteRmediate Outcome Measures In COPD Study (SPIROMICS), we find that lung bacterial composition associates with several clinical features, in particular bronchodilator responsiveness, peak expiratory flow rate, and forced expiratory flow rate between 25 and 75% of FVC (FEF25–75). Measures of symptom burden (COPD Assessment Test) and functional impairment (six-minute walk distance) also associate with disparate lung microbiota composition. Drivers of these relationships include members of the Streptococcus, Prevotella, Veillonella, Staphylococcus, and Pseudomonas genera. Thus, lung microbiota differences may contribute to airway dysfunction and airway disease in milder COPD.

scholarly journals Prognostic significance of chronic respiratory symptoms in individuals with normal spirometry

2019 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 1900734 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yunus Çolak ◽  
Børge G. Nordestgaard ◽  
Jørgen Vestbo ◽  
Peter Lange ◽  
Shoaib Afzal
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Symptoms ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Airway Disease ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Forced Expiratory Volume ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Respiratory Mortality ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Normal spirometry is often used to preclude airway disease in individuals with unspecific respiratory symptoms. We tested the hypothesis that chronic respiratory symptoms are associated with respiratory hospitalisations and death in individuals with normal spirometry without known airway disease.We included 108 246 randomly chosen individuals aged 20–100 years from a Danish population-based cohort study. Normal spirometry was defined as a pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s/forced vital capacity ratio ≥0.70. Chronic respiratory symptoms included dyspnoea, chronic mucus hypersecretion, wheezing and cough. Individuals with known airway disease, i.e. chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and/or asthma, were excluded (n=10 291). We assessed risk of hospitalisations due to exacerbations of airway disease and pneumonia, and respiratory and all-cause mortality, from 2003 through 2018.52 999 individuals had normal spirometry without chronic respiratory symptoms and 30 890 individuals had normal spirometry with chronic respiratory symptoms. During follow-up, we observed 1037 hospitalisations with exacerbation of airway disease, 5743 hospitalisations with pneumonia and 8750 deaths, of which 463 were due to respiratory disease. Compared with individuals with normal spirometry without chronic respiratory symptoms, multivariable adjusted hazard ratios for individuals with normal spirometry with chronic respiratory symptoms were 1.62 (95% CI 1.20–2.18) for exacerbation hospitalisations, 1.26 (95% CI 1.17–1.37) for pneumonia hospitalisations, 1.59 (95% CI 1.22–2.06) for respiratory mortality and 1.19 (95% CI 1.13–1.25) for all-cause mortality. There was a positive dose–response relationship between number of symptoms and risk of outcomes. Results were similar after 2 years of follow-up, for never-smokers alone, and for each symptom separately.Chronic respiratory symptoms are associated with respiratory hospitalisations and death in individuals with normal spirometry without known airway disease.

scholarly journals Risk of COPD with obstruction in active smokers with normal spirometry and reduced diffusion capacity

2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 1589-1597 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben-Gary Harvey ◽  
Yael Strulovici-Barel ◽  
Robert J. Kaner ◽  
Abraham Sanders ◽  
Thomas L. Vincent ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Complete Blood Count ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease ◽  
Airway Disease ◽  
Forced Expiratory Volume ◽  
Airflow Limitation ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Global Initiative

Smokers are assessed for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) using spirometry, with COPD defined by the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) as airflow limitation that is not fully reversible with bronchodilators. There is a subset of smokers with normal spirometry (by GOLD criteria), who have a low diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO), a parameter linked to emphysema and small airway disease. The natural history of these “normal spirometry/low DLCO” smokers is unknown.From a cohort of 1570 smokers in the New York City metropolitian area, all of whom had normal spirometry, two groups were randomly selected for lung function follow-up: smokers with normal spirometry/normal DLCO (n=59) and smokers with normal spirometry/low DLCO (n=46). All had normal history, physical examination, complete blood count, urinalysis, HIV status, α1-antitrypsin level, chest radiography, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), FEV1/FVC ratio and total lung capacity. Throughout the study, all continued to be active smokers.In the normal spirometry/normal DLCO group assessed over 45±20 months, 3% developed GOLD-defined COPD. In contrast, in the normal spirometry/low DLCO group, followed over 41±31 months, 22% developed GOLD-defined COPD.Despite appearing “normal” according to GOLD, smokers with normal spirometry but low DLCO are at significant risk of developing COPD with obstruction to airflow.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document