scholarly journals INTREPID: single- versus multiple-inhaler triple therapy for COPD in usual clinical practice

2021 ◽  
pp. 00950-2020
Author(s):  
David M. G. Halpin ◽  
Sally Worsley ◽  
Afisi S. Ismaila ◽  
Kai-Michael Beeh ◽  
Dawn Midwinter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Triple Therapy ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Forced Expiratory Volume ◽  
Inhalation Technique ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Critical Error

IntroductionReal-world trial data comparing single- with multiple-inhaler triple therapy (MITT) in COPD patients are currently lacking. The effectiveness of once-daily single-inhaler fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) and MITT were compared in usual clinical care.MethodsINTREPID was a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase IV effectiveness study comparing FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg via the ELLIPTA inhaler with a clinician's choice of any approved non-ELLIPTA MITT in usual COPD clinical practice in five European countries. Primary endpoint was proportion of COPD Assessment Test (CAT) responders (≥2-unit decrease in CAT score from baseline) at Week 24. Secondary endpoints in a subpopulation included change from baseline in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and percentage of patients making ≥1 critical error in inhalation technique at Week 24. Safety was also assessed.Results3092 patients were included (FF/UMEC/VI N=1545; MITT N=1547). The proportion of CAT responders at Week 24 was significantly greater with FF/UMEC/VI versus non-ELLIPTA MITT (odds ratio: 1.31; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.13, 1.51; p<0.001) and mean change from baseline in FEV1 was significantly greater with FF/UMEC/VI (77 mL versus 28 mL; treatment difference [95% CI] 50 mL [26, 73]; p<0.001). The percentage of patients with ≥1 critical error in inhalation technique was low in both groups (FF/UMEC/VI 6%, non-ELLIPTA MITT 3%). Safety profiles, including incidence of pneumonia serious adverse events, were similar between treatments.ConclusionsIn a usual clinical care setting, treatment with once-daily single-inhaler FF/UMEC/VI resulted in significantly more patients gaining health status improvement and greater lung function improvement versus non-ELLIPTA MITT.

scholarly journals Single-inhaler fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) triple therapy versus tiotropium monotherapy in patients with COPD

2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandeep Bansal ◽  
Martin Anderson ◽  
Antonio Anzueto ◽  
Nicola Brown ◽  
Chris Compton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Status ◽  
Triple Therapy ◽  
Treatment Guidelines ◽  
Forced Expiratory Volume ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Fluticasone Furoate ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Copd Patients ◽  
Severe Copd

AbstractChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) treatment guidelines do not currently include recommendations for escalation directly from monotherapy to triple therapy. This 12-week, double-blind, double-dummy study randomized 800 symptomatic moderate-to-very-severe COPD patients receiving tiotropium (TIO) for ≥3 months to once-daily fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) 100/62.5/25 mcg via ELLIPTA (n = 400) or TIO 18 mcg via HandiHaler (n = 400) plus matched placebo. Study endpoints included change from baseline in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) at Days 85 (primary), 28 and 84 (secondary), health status (St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire [SGRQ] and COPD Assessment Test [CAT]) and safety. FF/UMEC/VI significantly improved trough FEV1 at all timepoints (Day 85 treatment difference [95% CI] 95 mL [62–128]; P < 0.001), and significantly improved SGRQ and CAT versus TIO. Treatment safety profiles were similar. Once-daily single-inhaler FF/UMEC/VI significantly improved lung function and health status versus once-daily TIO in symptomatic moderate-to-very-severe COPD patients, with a similar safety profile.

Open label phase II studies of modified vaccinia ankara expressing the tumor antigen 5T4 given in conjunction with IFL and FOLFOX chemotherapy regimens: Final analysis of safety and immunogenicity of MVA 5T4 given before, during and after chemotherapy

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2527-2527
Author(s):  
R. Harrop ◽  
R. Hawkins ◽  
A. Anthoney ◽  
N. Steven ◽  
N. Habib ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Immune Responses ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Clinical Responses ◽  
Folfox Chemotherapy

2527 Background: 5T4 is a tumour associated antigen that is widely expressed on the surface of most human adenocarcinomas, including colorectal, but rarely in normal cells. Modified Vaccinia Ankara (MVA) has been employed as a vaccine vector to deliver 5T4. Previously, MVA-5T4 has been evaluated in a phase I/II clinical trial in stage IV colorectal cancer patients. MVA-5T4 was shown to be safe and well tolerated and induced 5T4 specific immune responses in most patients. Furthermore, 5T4 specific antibody titres correlated with clinical benefit. Methods: Two open label phase II clinical trials were initiated in which patients with advanced colorectal cancer received MVA-5T4 in conjunction with either 5-FU/leukovorin and irinotecan (TV2-IFL; n=19 patients) or 5-FU/leukovorin and oxaliplatin (TV2-FOLFOX; n=17 patients). MVA-5T4 was administered up to 6 times, 2 prior to, 2 during and 2 post-chemotherapy. The primary objectives were to assess the safety and immunogenicity of MVA-5T4 given in combination with chemotherapy. Results: Recruitment to both trials is complete and MVA-5T4 was well tolerated in all ITT patients, with no serious adverse events being associated with MVA-5T4. 5T4-specific cellular and humoral immune responses were monitored before, during and after chemotherapy in all 23 per protocol patients (n=12 for TV2-IFL and n=11 for TV2-FOLFOX). Following vaccination, all 23 patients mounted 5T4 cellular and/or humoral responses. Immune responses were detectable during chemotherapy in the majority of patients. IFNγ ELISPOT responses to 5T4 peptides revealed precursor frequencies as high as 1 in 1000 PBMCs. Assessment of clinical responses in all PP patients demonstrated an overall response rate of 65% across both trials. Conclusions: MVA-5T4 is safe and well tolerated when administered in conjunction with IFL and FOLFOX chemotherapy regimens. Furthermore, 5T4 specific immune responses are induced in all per protocol patients and can be boosted or maintained during chemotherapy. Encouraging clinical responses have been observed and 5T4 immune responses shown to correlate with clinical benefit. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Clinical effectiveness of once-daily fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol in usual practice: the COPD INTREPID study design

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 00061-2019
Author(s):  
Sally Worsley ◽  
Neil Snowise ◽  
David M.G. Halpin ◽  
Dawn Midwinter ◽  
Afisi S. Ismaila ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Effectiveness ◽  
Healthcare Systems ◽  
Forced Expiratory Volume ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Fluticasone Furoate ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Meaningful Improvement ◽  
Holistic View ◽  
Usual Practice ◽  
Once Daily

Effectiveness studies complement conventional randomised controlled trials by providing a holistic view of treatments in the setting of usual clinical practice. We present the protocol for the ongoing INTREPID (INvestigation of TRelegy Effectiveness: usual PractIce Design; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03467425) study, a randomised, open-label, 24-week effectiveness study of once-daily fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI; Trelegy) delivered by the ELLIPTA inhaler versus non-ELLIPTA multiple-inhaler triple therapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in usual practice settings. INTREPID was designed to provide evidence of FF/UMEC/VI effectiveness in patients with COPD managed in routine healthcare systems across multiple European countries. Between study initiation and end-of-study visits, patients will receive their medication and care as they would ordinarily receive it, from their usual healthcare provider at their usual healthcare centre. Study-specific intervention will be minimal. The primary end-point will be the proportion of COPD assessment test (CAT) responders, defined as a clinically meaningful improvement from baseline of ≥2 units, at week 24. The CAT was chosen as it provides health status information relevant to patients, physicians, health technology agencies and payers. Lung function (forced expiratory volume in 1 s) and critical inhaler errors will also be assessed in a subgroup of patients. The strengths and weaknesses of the protocol and some of the challenges associated with conducting this multicountry study, such as differences in healthcare systems and treatment practices across sites, will also be discussed.

Phase I evaluation of vandetanib with radiation therapy (RT) ± cisplatin in previously untreated advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6016-6016 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Papadimitrakopoulou ◽  
S. J. Frank ◽  
G. R. Blumenschein ◽  
C. Chen ◽  
M. Kane ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Tyrosine Kinases ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
To Receive

6016 Background: Vandetanib is a once-daily oral anticancer agent that selectively targets VEGF, EGF and RET receptor tyrosine kinases. We report preliminary results from an ongoing open-label phase I study of vandetanib with RT ± cisplatin in patients (pts) with previously untreated, unresected, locally advanced (stage III-IV) HNSCC. Methods: Eligible pts received once-daily vandetanib for 14 days followed by either 1) concomitant vandetanib + RT (2 Gy/d, 5 d/wk; total 70 Gy) + cisplatin (30 mg/m2, 2 h iv infusion/wk) for 7 wks, or 2) concomitant vandetanib + RT (2.2 Gy/d accelerated fractionation, 5 d/wk; total 66 Gy) for 6 wks. The primary objective was to determine the safety, tolerability and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of vandetanib in both regimens. The first pt cohort received vandetanib 100 mg/day; escalation to 200 mg and 300 mg in subsequent cohorts was permitted providing <2/6 (33%) pts in the preceding cohort experienced a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Cohort expansion at the MTD of vandetanib was also planned. Results: As of Dec 1 2008, 24 pts (median age 53.5 yrs; 19 male; all M0) had received treatment with vandetanib + RT + cisplatin (n=18) or vandetanib + RT (n=6). In the triplet arm, no DLTs occurred in the initial vandetanib 100 mg cohort (n=6); an additional 6 pts were enrolled to receive vandetanib 200 mg but this dose was considered to exceed the MTD since DLTs were reported in 3/5 evaluable pts (Table). Vandetanib 100 mg was therefore declared the MTD with RT + cisplatin and cohort expansion at this dose continues. In regimen 2), 6 pts have received vandetanib 100 mg + RT and evaluation of this initial cohort is ongoing. Conclusions: This study, which continues to recruit, is the first to evaluate dual targeting of VEGFR/EGFR tyrosine kinases with chemoradiation or radiation alone in HNSCC pts. Among the 24 treated pts, 2 have completed the 2-year follow up, 1 death occurred that was causally related to cisplatin, and 21 remain in follow up or continue to receive treatment. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Omeprazole Once or Twice Daily with Clarithromycin and Metronidazole forHelicobacter pyloriEradicaiton in a Canadian Community Practice

2000 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naoki Chiba ◽  
Cheryl P Marshall
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Triple Therapy ◽  
Community Practice ◽  
Taste Disturbance ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Daily Group ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
H Pylori ◽  
Intent To Treat

BACKGROUND: Triple therapy for one week with omeprazole, clarithromycin and metronidazole (OCM) is accepted worldwide as a first line therapy forHelicobacter pylorieradication. It is unclear whether omeprazole needs to be given once or twice daily.OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of these regimens in a single-centre, Canadian practice.METHODS: Histologically provenH pylori-positive patients were treated for seven days with clarithromycin 250 mg bid and metronidazole 500 mg bid, and randomly allocated to omeprazole 20 mg either once or twice daily in this open, cohort study. Endoscopy with histology (two antrum and two body biopsies, Giemsa stain) was done four weeks or longer after the pills were completed to assessH pylorieradication.RESULTS: Whether omeprazole was given once or twice daily, eradication was high and the same in both arms. All-patients-treated eradication was 85% (39 of 46 in the omeprazole once daily group and 41 of 48 in the omeprazole twice daily group) and intent-to-treat eradication was 80% (39 of 49 in the omeprazole once daily group and 41 of 51 in the omeprazole twice daily group). Side effects were frequently seen, suffered by 65% to 69% of patients treated. However, these were mild and compliance was high, with 94% of patients taking all of their pills. Mild side effects included loose stools, taste disturbance, nausea, headache and upper or lower gastrointestinal gas. Only one patient (1%) from the omeprazole once daily arm stopped taking metronidazole due to excessive perspiring.CONCLUSIONS: In this community practice, OCM triple therapy was effective whether omeprazole was given once or twice daily. For those with financial constraint, omeprazole 20 mg once daily can be considered. The regimens were well tolerated without serious adverse events.

Low-dose ritonavir-boosted darunavir once daily versus ritonavir-boosted lopinavir for participants with less than 50 HIV RNA copies per mL (WRHI 052): a randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (7) ◽  
pp. e428-e437 ◽  
Author(s):  
Willem D F Venter ◽  
Michelle Moorhouse ◽  
Simiso Sokhela ◽  
Celicia Serenata ◽  
Godspower Akpomiemie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Low Dose ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Hiv Rna ◽  
Open Label Phase

scholarly journals 4564 Nilotinib alters microRNAs that regulate specific autophagy and ubiquitination genes in the cerebrospinal fluid of Parkinson’s patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (s1) ◽  
pp. 99-99
Author(s):  
Alan Fowler ◽  
Yasar Torres-Yhagi ◽  
Fernando Pagan ◽  
Michaeline Hebron ◽  
Barbara Willmarth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cerebrospinal Fluid ◽  
Empirical Bayes ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
P Value ◽  
Whole Genome ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
Open Label Phase

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Our preclinical data demonstrate that the principal effects of nilotinib, a multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in models of neurodegeneration is clearance of misfolded proteins via autophagy. Here we aimed to evaluate the effects of nilotinib on microRNAs in the cerebrospinal fluid of Parkinson’s disease patients. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was collected as part of an open label phase I (NCT02281474) (n = 12, 300 mg nilotinib taken orally once daily for 6 months), and a phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (NCT02954978) (n = 75, randomized 1:1:1 into placebo, 150 mg or 300 mg nilotinib taken orally once daily for 12 months). RNA was isolated from CSF and Indexed sequencing libraries were prepared from total RNA plus miRNA. Next generation whole-genome sequencing (single-end 1x75 bp, 25 million raw reads per sample) was performed to identify miRNAs significantly differentially expressed (fold-change ≥ 2, Benjamini-Hochberg FDR p-value ≤ 0.05 or Empirical Bayes FDR ≤ 0.05) with treatment compared to baseline. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Next generation whole-genome sequencing of microRNAs in the CSF demonstrated that nilotinib significantly increases microRNAs that specifically regulate expression of autophagy and ubiquitination genes in individuals with Parkinson’s disease. In the open label phase I, samples, 28 microRNAs found to regulate autophagy and ubiquitination genes, were significantly altered with treatment (Benjamini-Hochberg FDR p-value ≤ 0.05). In the phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study samples, we verified several of those 28 candidate microRNAs had been significantly deferentially expressed with treatment (Empirical Bayes FDR p-value ≤ 0.05). DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Our data provide robust evidence that nilotinib’s effects on misfolded protein clearance is via autophagy and CSF miRNA sequencing is a valid biomarker of nilotinib’s effects in a definitive phase III study to investigate nilotinib in Parkinson’s and other neurodegenerative diseases. CONFLICT OF INTEREST DESCRIPTION: Charbel Moussa is listed as an inventor on several Georgetown University patents for the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors as a treatment for neurodegenerative diseases

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document