The use of ultrasound imaging to estimate fluid status to guide the treatment of patients hospitalised with heart failure

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdullah Al-Alawi ◽  
Amira Al-Badi
Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pratik Doshi ◽  
John Tanaka ◽  
Jedrek Wosik ◽  
Natalia M Gil ◽  
Martin Bertran ◽  
...  

Introduction: There is a need for innovative solutions to better screen and diagnose the 7 million patients with chronic heart failure. A key component of assessing these patients is monitoring fluid status by evaluating for the presence and height of jugular venous distension (JVD). We hypothesize that video analysis of a patient’s neck using machine learning algorithms and image recognition can identify the amount of JVD. We propose the use of high fidelity video recordings taken using a mobile device camera to determine the presence or absence of JVD, which we will use to develop a point of care testing tool for early detection of acute exacerbation of heart failure. Methods: In this feasibility study, patients in the Duke cardiac catheterization lab undergoing right heart catheterization were enrolled. RGB and infrared videos were captured of the patient’s neck to detect JVD and correlated with right atrial pressure on the heart catheterization. We designed an adaptive filter based on biological priors that enhances spatially consistent frequency anomalies and detects jugular vein distention, with implementation done on Python. Results: We captured and analyzed footage for six patients using our model. Four of these six patients shared a similar strong signal outliner within the frequency band of 95bpm – 200bpm when using a conservative threshold, indicating the presence of JVD. We did not use statistical analysis given the small nature of our cohort, but in those we detected a positive JVD signal the RA mean was 20.25 mmHg and PCWP mean was 24.3 mmHg. Conclusions: We have demonstrated the ability to evaluate for JVD via infrared video and found a relationship with RHC values. Our project is innovative because it uses video recognition and allows for novel patient interactions using a non-invasive screening technique for heart failure. This tool can become a non-invasive standard to both screen for and help manage heart failure patients.


Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sahitya Allam ◽  
Evan Harmon ◽  
Sula Mazimba ◽  
James M Mangrum ◽  
Ilana Kutinsky ◽  
...  

Background: Recent randomized clinical trial data has supported catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with heart failure (HF). Ablation and fluid management strategies could impact periprocedural outcomes especially in HF patients. Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of 200 consecutive patients with and without HF undergoing CA at a tertiary care academic center from July 2017 through June 2018. HF was defined as any EF < 40%, prior inpatient admission for HF exacerbation, or ambulatory management of HF confirmed by independent chart review. Diuretic regimens were reported as furosemide equivalent. Results: Among 200 patients, 65 (32.5%) had HF and 135 (67.5%) did not. HF patients had longer mean procedure times (299.8 ± 96 min vs 268.4 ± 96 min, p = 0.03) and were more likely to require mitral isthmus (p < 0.001), posterior wall isolation (p = 0.002), and cavotriscupid isthmus (p = 0.004) ablations. There were no differences between the HF vs. non-HF groups’ intraprocedural volume intake, intraprocedural volume output, net fluid status, or intraprocedural diuretic dose (Table 1). HF patients received higher doses of IV (41.5 ± 43.0 mg vs 23.6 ± 11.8 mg, p = 0.007) and PO (43.2 ± 16.7 mg vs 26.7 ± 10.0 mg, p < 0.001) postprocedural diuretic. There were no differences in the rates of major in-hospital complications (Table 1). In a multivariable regression analysis adjusted for procedural covariates, there were higher proportions of posterior wall isolation (p = 0.01) as well as postprocedural PO (p = 0.01) and IV diuretic (p = 0.002) administration in the HF cohort. Conclusion: Intraprocedural volume and diuretic management was similar between HF and non-HF patients undergoing CA of AF, though HF patients tended to receive more aggressive diuresis post procedurally with no difference in complications. Table 1. Intra- and post-procedural management and outcomes in HF vs non-HF patients undergoing CA for AF


2012 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 154-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Umar A. Khan ◽  
Gerard P. Aurigemma

2017 ◽  
Vol 230 ◽  
pp. 476-481 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benedikt Koell ◽  
Caroline Zotter-Tufaro ◽  
Franz Duca ◽  
Andreas A. Kammerlander ◽  
Stefan Aschauer ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. e43
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Romano ◽  
Diego Bellavia ◽  
Francesco Clemenza
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (8) ◽  
pp. S41
Author(s):  
Griffin Struyk ◽  
Mohammed Essa ◽  
Peter Flueckiger ◽  
Alda Bregasi ◽  
Robert McNamara ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document