scholarly journals Simultaneous comparison of depth of sedation performance between SedLine and BIS during general anesthesia using custom passive interface hardware: study protocol for a prospective, non-blinded, non-randomized trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
James Harvey Jones ◽  
Vinay Ravikumar Nittur ◽  
Neal Fleming ◽  
Richard L. Applegate
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Brain Function ◽  
Anesthesia Induction ◽  
Anesthetic Depth ◽  
Clinical Assessments ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Processed Eeg ◽  
Brain Function Monitoring

Abstract Background Intraoperative brain function monitoring with processed electroencephalogram (EEG) indices, such as the bispectral index (BIS) and patient state index (PSI), may improve characterization of the depth of sedation or anesthesia when compared to conventional physiologic monitors, such as heart rate and blood pressure. However, the clinical assessment of anesthetic depth may not always agree with available processed EEG indices. To concurrently compare the performance of BIS and SedLine monitors, we present a data collection system using shared individual generic sensors connected to a custom-built passive interface box. Methods This prospective, non-blinded, non-randomized study will enroll 100 adult American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I-III patients presenting for elective procedures requiring general anesthesia. BIS and SedLine electrodes will be placed preoperatively according to manufacturer recommendations and their respective indices tracked throughout anesthesia induction, maintenance and emergence. The concordance between processed EEG indices and clinical assessments of anesthesia depth will be analyzed with chi-square and kappa statistic. Discussion Prior studies comparing brain function monitoring devices have applied both sensors on the forehead of study subjects simultaneously. With limited space and common sensor locations between devices, it is not possible to place both commercial sensor arrays according to the manufacturer’s recommendations, thus compromising the validity of these comparisons. This trial utilizes a custom interface allowing signals from sensors to be shared between BIS and SedLine monitors to provide an accurate comparison. Our results will also characterize the degree of agreement between processed EEG indices and clinical assessments of anesthetic depth as determined by the anesthesiologists’ interpretations of acute changes in blood pressure and heart rate as well as the administration, or change to the continuous delivery, of medications at these timepoints. Patient factors (such as burst suppression state or low power EEG conditions from aging brain), surgical conditions (such as use of electrocautery), artifacts (such as electromyography), and anesthesia medications and doses (such as end-tidal concentration of volatile anesthetic or hypnotic infusion dose) that lead to lack of agreement will be explored as well. Trial registration Clinical Trials (ClinicalTrials.gov), NCT03865316. Registered on 4 February 2019 – retrospectively registered. Sponsor: Masimo Corporation.

scholarly journals Recommended dose of sufentanil during induction of general anesthesia to avoid coughing and drastic hemodynamic fluctuations in patients undergoing surgery

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 030006052199614
Author(s):  
Ping Chen ◽  
Ping Zeng ◽  
Yuan Gong ◽  
Xiang Long
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Adverse Reactions ◽  
The Other ◽  
Anesthesia Induction ◽  
Common Complication ◽  
Chest Tightness ◽  
Group I

Background Sufentanil-induced cough (SIC) is a common complication during anesthesia induction. We explored the recommended sufentanil dose that effectively avoids cough during general anesthesia using a clinical trial to analyze the effective dose (ED)50 and ED95 of sufentanil that avoids cough, hemodynamic fluctuations, and adverse reactions. Methods On the basis of sufentanil dose, 136 patients (ASA class I–II) were randomly allocated into the following groups: I, 0.1 μg/kg; II, 0.3 μg/kg; III, 0.5 μg/kg; or IV, 1.0 μg/kg. The number of coughing incidents, dizziness, panic, and chest tightness within 1 minute after sufentanil injection, and the patient’s heart rate (HR) and blood pressure 5 minutes after intubation were recorded and analyzed. Cough was assessed as follows: none, 0 times; mild, 1 to 2 times/minute; moderate, 3 to 4 times/minute; and severe, 5 times/minute or more. Results The ED50 and ED95 of cough incidence induced by intravenous sufentanil in patients during general anesthesia induction was 0.332 μg/kg and 1.423 μg/kg, respectively. The cough rate in group I was lower than the other groups. The incidence of dizziness, panic, chest tightness, hypertension, bradycardia, and tachycardia were not significantly different. Conclusions The recommended sufentanil dose during general anesthesia induction is 0.1 μg/kg.

scholarly journals Comparison of the combination of propofol and etomidate versus propofol or etomidate alone for induction of general anesthesia: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yun Li ◽  
Wenze Lu ◽  
David Li ◽  
Jon Zhou ◽  
Richard Applegate ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Rate ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Anesthesia Induction ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Hemodynamic Variables ◽  
Processed Eeg ◽  
Induction Agents

IntroductionHemodynamic fluctuation during the induction of general anesthesia is a common event and adversely affect patients’ outcomes. The aim of this study is to investigate the impacts of different anesthesia induction agents: propofol, etomidate, and propofol-etomidate combination on patient hemodynamics and processed electroencephalography (EEG).Material and methodsSeventy-five patients undergoing elective non-cardiac surgery were randomly assigned to three groups of anesthesia induction agents: the group P received 2 mg/kg propofol, the group E received 0.3 mg/kg etomidate, and the group PE received the combination of 1mg/kg propofol plus 0.15mg/kg etomidate. Hemodynamic variables and processed EEG were measured during induction.ResultsHeart rate (HR) was significantly increased at intubation and 1 min after intubation compared with baseline in all three groups. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) decreased significantly after induction, at 5, and 10 min after intubation in group P (79.1±12.6, 77.0±14.2, 76.6±11.4 versus 93.2±9.9 mmHg; all P＜0.001). MAP increased significantly at intubation and 1 min after intubation in group E (104.7±13.0, 103.8±12.8 versus 92.9±10.2; P＜0.001, P=0.001 respectively). The incidence of myoclonus was lower in groups PE (4.0%) and P (4.0%) compared with that in group E (24.0%) (P=0.033). The incidence of pain at injection was higher in group P (28.0%) than that in groups PE and E (4.0% and 0.0%) (P=0.025).ConclusionsThe combination of propofol and etomidate used during induction of anesthesia provided a more stable BP profile, less pain at site of injection, and decreased myoclonic movements compared with propofol or etomidate alone.

scholarly journals Effect of intravenous oxycodone on the physiologic responses to extubation following general anesthesia

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Menglu Jiang ◽  
Jiawei Ji ◽  
Xin Li ◽  
Zhenqing Liu
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Clinical Trial Registry ◽  
Blood Oxygen Saturation ◽  
Blood Concentrations ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Blood Hormones

Abstract Background Endotracheal intubation and extubation may cause undesirable hemodynamic changes. Intravenous oxycodone has recently been introduced and used for relieving hemodynamic alterations in response to intubation, but there is insufficient information regarding its application in stabilizing hemodynamics during extubation in the patients emerging from general anesthesia. Methods One hundred patients, who had undergone assorted laparoscopic surgeries under general anesthesia, were randomly assigned to Control group (saline injection, 50 cases) and Study group (intravenous injection of 0.08 mg/kg oxycodone immediately after completion of the surgical procedure, 50 cases). Blood pressure, heart rate, blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) as well as blood concentrations of epinephrine, norepinephrine, and cortisol were recorded or measured immediately before extubation (T0), during extubation (T1), as well as one minute (T2), 5 min (T3), and 10 min after extubation (T4). In addition, coughing and restlessness, time of eye-opening, and duration from completing surgery to extubation as well as Ramsay Sedation Scale were analyzed. Results Blood pressure and heart rate as well as blood concentrations of epinephrine, norepinephrine, and cortisol were significantly higher in the Control group compared with the Study group at the time of extubation as well as 1, 5, and 10 min after extubation (P < 0.05). When the patients emerged from general anesthesia, 70 % of the Control group had cough, which was significantly higher than that of Study group (40 %, P < 0.05). Significantly higher number of patients manifested restlessness in the Control group before (40 %) and after extubation (20 %) compared with that in the Study group (20 and 2 %, respectively, P < 0.05). In addition, patients of Control group had lower Ramsay score at extubation (1.7 ± 0.7) as well as 30 min after extubation (2.4 ± 0.9) compared to that of the patients of Study group (2.2 ± 0.9, and 3.0 ± 0.8, respectively, P = 0.003 and 0.001). Conclusions Intravenous oxycodone attenuated alterations of hemodynamics and blood hormones associated with extubation during emergence from general anesthesia. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2000040370 (registration date: 11-28-2020) “‘retrospectively registered”.

scholarly journals Observer’s Assessment of Alertness/Sedation-based titration reduces propofol consumption and incidence of hypotension during general anesthesia induction: A randomized controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 104 (4) ◽  
pp. 003685042110523
Author(s):  
Lihong Chen ◽  
Kun Lu ◽  
Tongfeng Luo ◽  
Huiming Liang ◽  
Yuqin Gui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Diastolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Mean Blood Pressure ◽  
Conventional Group ◽  
Anesthesia Induction ◽  
Post Intubation

Administration of a single propofol bolus dose for anesthesia induction causes hypotension. We included 160 patients (74 males and 86 females; mean age, 42.4 ± 10.7 [range: 18–60] years) with the American Society of Anesthesiologists status I–II undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia. Using simple randomization, the patients were divided into a conventional group ( n = 80; received 2 mg/kg propofol at a rate of 250 mg/min) and titrated group ( n = 80; received propofol at a rate of 1 mg/kg/min until the Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation scale score reached 1 point). Fentanyl (4 µg/kg) and cisatracurium (0.2 mg/kg) were administered, as appropriate. Systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean blood pressure, and heart rate were recorded at different time points. Propofol consumption, hypotension, and other adverse events were recorded. All the patients were intubated without awareness. Compared with the conventional group, the titrated group showed more stable blood pressure ( p < 0.05), as well as a lower decrease in systolic blood pressure, mean blood pressure at 1 and 3 min, and diastolic blood pressure at 1 min after propofol administration ( p < 0.01). Moreover, compared with the conventional group, the titrated group showed a lower post-intubation hypotension incidence (9 vs. 19 cases; p = 0.04), as well as lower total propofol dosage and propofol dose per kilogram of body weight (93.57 ± 14.40 mg vs. 116.80 ± 22.37 mg and 1.73 ± 0.27 mg/kg vs. 2.02 ± 0.08 mg/kg, respectively, p < 0.01). Compared with conventional propofol usage, titrated propofol administration can reduce the incidence of hypotension and propofol consumption during anesthesia induction.

scholarly journals Perbedaan Respon Hemodinamik dengan Penambahan Blok Scalp Levobupivakain pada Operasi Kraniotomi

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-15
Author(s):  
Arya Justisia Sani ◽  
Ardhana Tri Arianto ◽  
Muhammad Husni Thamrin
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Mean Arterial Pressure ◽  
Arterial Pressure ◽  
Hemodynamic Response ◽  
Anesthesia Induction ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Scalp Block ◽  
One Way Anova

Latar Belakang dan Tujuan: Peningkatan respon hemodinamik yang disebabkan oleh nyeri dapat menyebabkan peningkatan aliran darah otak dan tekanan intrakranial. Blok scalp pada kraniotomi menumpulkan respon hemodinamik karena rangsangan nyeri serta mengurangi penambahan analgesi lain. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui efektifitas blok scalp sebagai analgetik pada kraniotomi.Subjek dan Metode: Penelitian ini menggunakan uji klinik acak tersamar ganda pada 36 pasien dengan status fisik ASA 1–3 dilakukan operasi kraniotomi eksisi dan memenuhi kriteria inklusi. Sampel dibagi menjadi kelompok I (dengan blok scalp) dan kelompok II (tanpa blok scalp). Blok dilakukan sesaat setelah induksi anestesi. Digunakan levobupivakain 0,375% sebanyak 3 ml tiap insersi, pada masing-masing saraf. Tekanan darah, tekanan arteri rata-rata, detak jantung sebelum intubasi dan setelah intubasi, pemasangan pin, insisi kulit dan insisi duramater serta total kebutuhan fentanyl tambahan dicatat. Data yang diperoleh dianalisis dengan program komputer SPSS versi 17 lalu diuji menggunakan uji Kruskal-Wallis atau One-way ANOVA. Batas kemaknaan yang diambil adalah p < 0,05.Hasil: Selama kraniotomi, detak jantung, tekanan darah, tekanan arteri rata-rata secara signifikan lebih tinggi pada pasien tanpa blok scalp terutama pada saat pemasangan pin. Hasil uji statistik menunjukkan perbedaan signifikan, penambahan fentanyl pada pasien dengan blok scalp lebih sedikit dibandingkan tanpa blok scalp, p=0,000 (p<0,05).Simpulan: Blok scalp levobupivakain efektif dalam menurunkan respon hemodinamik terutama pada saat pemasangan pin. Pasien kraniotomi dengan blok scalp membutuhkan penambahan fentanyl lebih sedikit. Differences on Hemodynamic Response with Levobupivacaine Scalp Block in Craniotomy SurgeryAbstractBackground and Objective: Increased hemodynamic response caused by pain can lead to increased cerebral blood flow and intracranial pressure. Scalp block in craniotomy blunts hemodynamic response due to pain and reduce other analgesics addition. This study aims to determine effectiveness of scalp blocks as analgesic in craniotomy.Subject and Method: This study used a double-blind randomized clinical trial in 36 patients with physical status ASA 1-3 who underwent craniotomy and met inclusion criteria. Samples were divided into group I (with scalp block) and group II (without scalp block). Scalp Block was performed right after anesthesia induction. Using levobupivacaine 0.375% 3 ml for each insertion. Blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, heart rate before and after intubation, during pin placement, skin incision and duramater incision and total need for additional fentanyl were recorded. SPSS version 17 was used and data were analysed using Kruskal-Wallis or One-way ANOVA. Statistical significance was accepted at p < 0.05.Result: During craniotomy, heart rate, blood pressure, mean arterial pressure were significantly higher in patients without scalp block especially during pin placement. Statistical test showed significant difference, additional fentanyl in patients with scalp blocks was lesser, p = 0.000 (p <0.05). Conclusion: Levobupivacaine scalp block was effective to blunt hemodynamic response especially during pin placement. Scalp block also decreased additional fentanyl in craniotomy.

scholarly journals A randomized comparative study of preloading with Ringers lactate and intravenous Ephedrine for the prevention of hypotension due to propofol during induction of general anesthesia

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manisha Pradhan ◽  
Brahma Dev Jha
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Mean Arterial Pressure ◽  
Arterial Pressure ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Diastolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Endotracheal Intubation ◽  
Physical Status ◽  
Volume Loading

Background: The ideal method to prevent hypotension due to intravenous propofol for induction of anesthesia is still debatable. The aim of the study was to compare the hemodynamic response of ephedrine and volume loading with ringer lactate in preventing the hypotension caused by propofol as inducing agent in patients scheduled for elective surgeries requiring general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation.Methods: This was prospective randomized study conducted in 40 patients of ASA physical status I, aged 20-50 years, scheduled for elective surgeries requiring general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation. Group I received intravenous ephedrine sulphate (70 mcg/kg) just before induction of anaesthesia, and patients assigned to Group II received preloading with Ringer's lactate (12 ml/kg) over the 10-15 minutes before the administration of propofol. The variables compared were heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure following induction of anesthesia till 10 minutes after intubation of trachea.Results: We found that there were increase in systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and mean arterial pressure after induction in both the groups but the difference between the groups was not significant. The increase in heart rate was found to be significantly higher in ephedrine group in comparison to volume loading group.Conclusion: Our study showed that both the methods used were equally effective in preventing hypotension induced by propofol in the adult ASA physical status I patients requiring general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation. However, the heart rate was significantly higher in patients receiving ephedrine in comparison to volume loading group.

scholarly journals Association between General Anesthesia and the Occurrence of Cerebrovascular Accidents in Hip Fracture Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Hu Wang ◽  
Lingyan Gao
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Hip Fracture ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Cerebrovascular Accidents ◽  
General Anesthesia Group ◽  
Anesthetic Drugs ◽  
Anesthesia Group

Background. General anesthesia is an important factor leading to postoperative complications, and cerebrovascular accidents take the first place in the causes of postoperative death. Therefore, it is extremely important to explore the correlation between general anesthesia and the occurrence of cerebrovascular accidents in hip fracture patients. Objective. To explore the association between general anesthesia and the occurrence of cerebrovascular accidents in hip fracture patients. Methods. The data of 240 hip fracture patients treated in our hospital from February 2017 to February 2021 were retrospectively analyzed, and the patients were divided into the general anesthesia group (n = 120) and nongeneral anesthesia group (n = 120) according to whether or not they received general anesthesia, so as to compare their incidence rate of cerebrovascular accidents between the two groups, record their hemodynamic changes, and analyze the association between various risk factors under general anesthesia and the occurrence of cerebrovascular accidents. Results. No statistical differences in patients’ general information such as age and gender between the two groups were observed ( P  > 0.05); compared with the nongeneral anesthesia group, the incidence rate of cerebrovascular accidents was significantly higher in the general anesthesia group ( P  < 0.001); between the two groups, the heart rates and mean arterial pressure (MAP) at 15 min after anesthesia, at the time of skin incision, and 15 min before the end of surgery were significantly different ( P  < 0.05); according to the multiple logistic regression analysis, general anesthesia was a risk factor affecting the occurrence of cerebrovascular accidents in hip fracture patients, and under general anesthesia, age ≥80 years, BMI ≥23 kg/m2, types of anesthetic drugs ≥4, intraoperative blood pressure ≥140 mmHg, and intraoperative heart rate ≥80 bpm were also regarded as the risk factors. Conclusion. General anesthesia is a risk factor affecting the occurrence of cerebrovascular accidents in hip fracture patients, and under general anesthesia, age ≥80 years, BMI ≥23 kg/m2, types of anesthetic drugs ≥4, intraoperative blood pressure ≥140 mmHg, and intraoperative heart rate ≥80 bpm will further increase the possibility of cerebrovascular accidents.

scholarly journals Effects of epidural analgesia using different concentrations of bupivacaine during combined general and epidural anesthesia

2012 ◽  
Vol 65 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 289-293
Author(s):  
Dragana Unic-Stojanovic ◽  
Vojislava Neskovic ◽  
Ivan Ilic
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Epidural Analgesia ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Epidural Anesthesia ◽  
Aortic Surgery ◽  
Abdominal Aortic Surgery ◽  
Thoracic Epidural ◽  
Abdominal Aortic

Introduction. Thoracic epidural analgesia, combined with general anesthesia, is an established anesthetic choice for abdominal aortic surgery. However, there are controversies about the level of anesthesia as well as the dose and concentration of the local anesthetic used. The aim of the study was to compare the effects of two different concentrations of epidural bupivacaine on sevoflurane requirements and hemodynamic parameters during aortic surgery under combined epidural/general anesthesia. Methods and Material. Sixty patients scheduled for abdominal aortic surgery were randomly divided into two groups according to the concentration of local anesthetic used for epidural anesthesia: - Group 1- low concentration - where 0.125% bupivacaine was used, and - Group 2 - high concentration - where 0.5% bupivacaine was used at the beginning and then the concentration was reduced to 0.25%. Anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane, the dose was adjusted to achieve the target entropy of 40-60. The measurements included the inspired sevoflurane concentrations, blood pressure, and heart rate at the beginning and every 5 min during the surgery. Results. Both groups had similar heart rate and blood pressure, but the inspired sevoflurane concentration was significantly higher and more variable in patients where bupivacaine 0.125% was used. Vasopressors were used more often and in higher doses in the 0.5% bupivacaine group, and in the same group the blood loss and fluid requirements were reduced. Conclusion. When 0.5% bupivacaine is used in combined thoracic epidural/ general anesthesia for aortic surgery, the sevoflurane concentrations are lower and less variable. In addition, the blood loss and fluid requirements are reduced.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document