scholarly journals Comparison of an in house and a commercial real-time polymerase chain reaction targeting Toxoplasma gondii RE gene using various samples collected from patients in Turkey

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mert Döşkaya ◽  
Hüsnü Pullukçu ◽  
Muhammet Karakavuk ◽  
Esra Atalay Şahar ◽  
Mehmet Sezai Taşbakan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Toxoplasma Gondii ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Buffy Coat ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Chain Reactions ◽  
Polymerase Chain ◽  
Pcr Test

Abstract Background Toxoplasma gondii is an opportunistic protozoan parasite that can infect all warm-blooded animals including humans and cause serious clinical manifestations. Toxoplasmosis can be diagnosed using histological, serological, and molecular methods. In this study, we aimed to detect T. gondii RE gene in various human samples by in house and commercial real time polymerase chain reactions. Methods A total of 38 suspected cases of toxoplasmosis [peripheral blood (n:12), amnion fluid (n:11), tissue (n:9), cerebrospinal fluid (n:5), and intraocular fluid (n:1)] were included to the study. An in house and a commercial RT-PCR were applied to investigate the T. gondii RE gene in these samples. Results The compatibility rate of the two tests was 94.7% (37/38). When the commercial RT-PCR kit was taken as reference, the sensitivity and specificity of in house RT-PCR test was 87.5 and 100%. When the in house RT-PCR test was taken as reference, the commercial RT-PCR kit has 100% sensitivity and 96.8% specificity. Incompatibility was detected in only in a buffy coat sample with high protein content. Conclusions Both the commercial and in house RT-PCR tests can be used to investigate T. gondii RE gene in various clinical specimens with their high sensitivity and specificity. In house RT-PCR assay can be favorable due to cost savings compared to using the commercial test.

scholarly journals Evaluation of the performance of the COVID-19 rapid antigen tests in a tertiary level hospital in Bangladesh.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Jahidur Rahman Khan ◽  
Md. Shahadat Hossain ◽  
Samshad Jahan Shumu ◽  
Md. Selim Reza ◽  
Farzana Mim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Viral Load ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Detection Rate ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
College Hospital ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Qrt Pcr ◽  
Antigen Tests

Abstract Background: While the COVID-19 pandemic is a worldwide crisis, tests with high sensitivity and specificity are essential for identifying and managing COVID-19 patients. Globally, several rapid antigen tests RATs for COVID-19 have been developed, but their clinical efficacy has not been well established. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of several rapid antigen tests (RATs) to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 infection.Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted at Shaheed Suhrawardy Medical College hospital from February 2021 to April 2021 in Dhaka, Bangladesh. This study included the patients admitted in this hospital at the COVID-19 isolation unit or referred from the triage facility of the outdoor department of this hospital suspected as COVID-19 case. Two nasopharyngeal samples were collected simultaneously. one sample was used on the spot for the RAT. The other was sent to the adjacent Shaheed Suhrawardy Medical College COVID-19 RT-PCR laboratory for real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). The performance of the RAT was evaluated using the results of qRT-PCR as a reference.Results: A total of 223 patients were included in this study, and the real-time RT-PCR detected SARS-CoV-2 in 84 (37.7%) patients. Of these 84 patients, 9 (10.7%) were asymptomatic. The overall sensitivity and specificity of RATs were 78.6% and 99.3%, respectively. The sensitivity was 81.3% in symptomatic cases and 55.6% in asymptomatic cases. False-negatives were observed in 18 patients, 3 of whom were asymptomatic and had a low viral load (cycle threshold (Ct) > 30). The detection rate of RATs was 100% when the Ct value was up to 24. The detection rate was 42.3% when the Ct was >29. The detection rate of RATs was 92.3% when the onset of symptoms was within three days. The detection rate was 33.3% when the onset of symptoms was >7 days.Conclusions: RATs for COVID-19 used in this study delivered an acceptable performance in patients with high viral load and within the first week of the onset of symptoms. They can be used as a supplementary method to RT-PCR for the diagnosis of COVID-19 patients.

scholarly journals Perspective of Arguments in Public Health

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-45
Author(s):  
Dinesh Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Respiratory Symptoms ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Negative Report ◽  
Polymerase Chain ◽  
Time Of Admission ◽  
Pcr Test

Recently, an argument was put forth because a symptomatic and positive patient for CoVID-19 turned tested negative after 7 days, so discharged from the hospital. Both at the time of admission and discharge real-time reverse transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) was done for testing of CoVID-19. Immediately, patient again developed respiratory symptoms and was admitted to hospital again. Amidst of current CoVID-19 pandemic, a question was asked “What is the specificity of the Real Time-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) test for COVID-19?” with an assumption that what if at the time of discharge the disease is present in patient but test turned out to be negative? In response to that a counter statement was posed that “It is the sensitivity that should be asked rather than specificity”. It was based on the implication of primary question that was implying false negative report of the RT-PCR. It means, since patient was discharged with negative result that could be false negative.

scholarly journals Reducing False Negative PCR Test for COVID-19

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 408-410
Author(s):  
Fatemeh Bahreini ◽  
Rezvan Najafi ◽  
Razieh Amini ◽  
Salman Khazaei ◽  
Saeid Bashirian
Keyword(s):  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Real Time ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Creative Commons ◽  
Negative Results ◽  
False Negative Results ◽  
Polymerase Chain ◽  
Pcr Test

As the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic spreads rapidly, there is need for a diagnostic test with high accuracy to detect infected individuals especially those without symptoms. Real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is a common molecular test for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2. If some factors are not taken into consideration when performing this test, it can have a relatively large number of false negative results. In this article, we discuss important considerations that could lead to false negative test reduction. Key words: • SARS-CoV-2 • COVID-19 • Real time polymerase chain reaction • RT-PCR test • Diagnosis • False negatives • Genetics • Emerging disease   Copyright © 2020 Bahreini et al. Published by Global Health and Education Projects, Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0)which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in this journal, is properly cited.

scholarly journals Real-time RT-PCR diagnostics of virus causing COVID-19

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. V. Goncharova ◽  
A. E. Donnikov ◽  
V. V. Kadochnikova ◽  
S. A. Morozova ◽  
M. N. Boldyreva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Medical Product ◽  
World Health ◽  
Differential Diagnostics ◽  
Clinical Samples ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Pcr Diagnostics

Aim: the study was aimed to develop a reagent kit for the real-time RT-PCR diagnostics of virus causing COVID-19.Materials and Methods. Three target sites were chosen in the genome SARS-CoV-2. The testing included 220 samples, 48 artificially created positive samples (made from patients’ biomaterial) and 172 clinical samples (scrapes from nasal and pharyngeal cavities, bronchoalveolar lavage, expectoration, endotracheal/nasopharyngeal aspirate, feces, post-mortem material), obtained from two medical centers. Preliminary, the obtained biomaterial was analyzed with a reagent kit of comparison. The evaluation was performed with a confidential interval CI 95%. The calculation of CI for the sensitivity and specificity was made based on the distribution of χ2.Results. The authors developed a technology of novel coronavirus infection (COVID-19) real-time RT-PCR diagnostics for the application in practical healthcare and proposed the variants of testing at all the stages (preanalytical, analytical, and post-analytical, including automated results processing). The proposed reagent kit meets the requirements of the World Health Organization and the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation. The study results demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity. The sensitivity was 100% (95% CI) 95.6–100%; the specificity was 100% (95% CI) 96.7–100%.Conclusion. The proposed reagent kit was registered in the RF as a medical product; the registration certificate No. RZN 2020/9948 dated 01.04.2020. The application of the reagent kit in network laboratories will provide patients with access to testing for the virus causing COVID-19 and contribute to quick differential diagnostics, improvement of pandemic control, and accurate statistics on the spread of the virus. 

scholarly journals Rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection assay in comparison with real-time RT-PCR assay for laboratory diagnosis of COVID-19 in Thailand

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chutikarn Chaimayo ◽  
Bualan Kaewnaphan ◽  
Nattaya Tanlieng ◽  
Niracha Athipanyasilp ◽  
Rujipas Sirijatuphat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Laboratory Diagnosis ◽  
Antigen Detection ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Pcr Assay ◽  
Screening Assay ◽  
The Real ◽  
Pcr Test

Abstract Background The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic continues to spread across the world. Hence, there is an urgent need for rapid, simple, and accurate tests to diagnose severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Performance characteristics of the rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection test should be evaluated and compared with the gold standard real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test for diagnosis of COVID-19 cases. Methods The rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection test, Standard™ Q COVID-19 Ag kit (SD Biosensor®, Republic of Korea), was compared with the real-time RT-PCR test, Allplex™ 2019-nCoV Assay (Seegene®, Korea) for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in respiratory specimens. Four hundred fifty-four respiratory samples (mainly nasopharyngeal and throat swabs) were obtained from COVID-19 suspected cases and contact individuals, including pre-operative patients at Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand during March–May 2020. Results Of 454 respiratory samples, 60 (13.2%) were positive, and 394 (86.8%) were negative for SARS-CoV-2 RNA by real-time RT-PCR assay. The duration from onset to laboratory test in COVID-19 suspected cases and contact individuals ranged from 0 to 14 days with a median of 3 days. The rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection test’s sensitivity and specificity were 98.33% (95% CI, 91.06–99.96%) and 98.73% (95% CI, 97.06–99.59%), respectively. One false negative test result was from a sample with a high real-time RT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct), while five false positive test results were from specimens of pre-operative patients. Conclusions The rapid assay for SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection showed comparable sensitivity and specificity with the real-time RT-PCR assay. Thus, there is a potential use of this rapid and simple SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection test as a screening assay.

scholarly journals Comparison of real-time RT-PCR and RT-PCR/MALDI-TOF methods for SARS-CoV-2 detection in saliva

2021 ◽  
Vol 156 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S9-S9
Author(s):  
Matthew M Hernandez ◽  
Radhika Banu ◽  
Paras Shrestha ◽  
Armi Patel ◽  
Feng Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Limit Of Detection ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
N Gene ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Upper Respiratory ◽  
High Level ◽  
Respiratory Specimens ◽  
Pcr Test ◽  
Roche Cobas

Abstract Background The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has accelerated the need for rapid validation and implementation of assays for detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) in diagnostic specimens. Multiple molecular methods have received emergency use authorization by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in upper respiratory specimens, with testing of nasopharyngeal (NP) specimens serving as the foundation for these assays. However, supply chain constraints and the need for improved ease and safety of collection have prompted consideration of other specimen types as alternatives to NP specimens for detection of SARS-CoV-2. Here, we compared two methods for SARS-CoV-2 detection in saliva: the Roche cobas® 6800 SARS-CoV-2 real-time RT-PCR Test (“Roche”), which tests for viral ORF1ab (target 1, T1) and envelope E genes (target 2, T2); and the Agena Biosciences MassARRAY® SARS-CoV-2 Panel/MassARRAY® System (“Agena”), which tests for targets in the ORF1ab gene (ORF1, Orf1ab) and nucleocapsid N gene (N1, N2, N3). Methods Sixty saliva specimens collected within 48 hours of SARS-CoV-2 detection in an upper respiratory (anterior nares or NP) specimen from the same individual were tested in both the Roche and Agena platforms. Each system was evaluated for overall detection results and agreement with results of matched upper respiratory specimens. In addition, we determined the limit of detection (LoD) for each system and its component targets using an in-house SARS-CoV-2 standard generated from pooled positive saliva specimens quantitated against a commercially available standard (ZeptoMetrix NATSARS(COV2)-ERC). Results Both platforms demonstrated a similarly high sensitivity (97%) and specificity (100%) when compared to matched patient upper respiratory specimens and had high agreement with one another (Cohen’s κ = 0.9321, p = 2.6x10-13). Overall, the LoD (copies/mL) for the Roche assay was four times lower than that of Agena for saliva specimens (390.6 v. 1562.5). Furthermore, we determined that the LoD differed among the target components of each assay. The experimental LoD was comparable across Roche targets, but probit analyses indicate T2 has greater sensitivity (LoD: 228.6), Of the five Agena targets, the N2 target had the lowest LoD (1562.5). Conclusions In sum, we demonstrate that saliva is an acceptable specimen for testing in both the Roche cobas® 6800 SARS-CoV-2 real-time RT-PCR Test and the Agena Biosciences MassARRAY® SARS-CoV-2 Panel/MassARRAY® System, and both provide sensitive and specific detection of SARS-CoV-2 in saliva specimens. Although there was a high level of agreement between platforms, the LoD was lower for the Roche compared to the Agena assay with T2 and N2 being the most sensitive targets on each platform, respectively. The addition of saliva as an acceptable specimen and understanding the sensitivity for testing on these platforms can further inform public health measures for screening and detection to combat the pandemic.

1504: Molecular Diagnosis and Staging of Prostate Cancer Using Clusterin in Real Time Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR)

2006 ◽  
Vol 175 (4S) ◽  
pp. 485-486
Author(s):  
Sabarinath B. Nair ◽  
Christodoulos Pipinikas ◽  
Roger Kirby ◽  
Nick Carter ◽  
Christiane Fenske
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Molecular Diagnosis ◽  
Reverse Transcription ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Polymerase Chain

scholarly journals Investigations, actions and learning from an outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 infection among healthcare workers in the United Kingdom

2020 ◽  
pp. 175717742097679
Author(s):  
Kordo Saeed ◽  
Emanuela Pelosi ◽  
Nitin Mahobia ◽  
Nicola White ◽  
Christopher Labdon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Healthcare Facility ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Serum Samples ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Key Issues ◽  
Current Infection ◽  
Polymerase Chain ◽  
A Current

Background: We report an outbreak of SARS coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection among healthcare workers (HCW) in an NHS elective healthcare facility. Methodology: A narrative chronological account of events after declaring an outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 among HCWs. As part of the investigations, HCWs were offered testing during the outbreak. These were: (1) screening by real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT- PCR) to detect a current infection; and (2) serum samples to determine seroprevalence. Results: Over 180 HCWs were tested by real-time RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 infection. The rate of infection was 15.2% (23.7% for clinical or directly patient-facing HCWs vs. 4.8% in non-clinical non-patient-facing HCWs). Of the infected HCWs, 57% were asymptomatic. Seroprevalence (SARS-CoV-2 IgG) among HCWs was 13%. It was challenging to establish an exact source for the outbreak. The importance of education, training, social distancing and infection prevention practices were emphasised. Additionally, avoidance of unnecessary transfer of patients and minimising cross-site working for staff and early escalation were highlighted. Establishing mass and regular screening for HCWs are also crucial to enabling the best care for patients while maintaining the wellbeing of staff. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first UK outbreak report among HCWs and we hope to have highlighted some key issues and learnings that can be considered by other NHS staff and HCWs globally when dealing with such a task in future.

scholarly journals Anomaly Identification during Polymerase Chain Reaction for Detecting SARS-CoV-2 Using Artificial Intelligence Trained from Simulated Data

Molecules ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 20
Author(s):  
Reynaldo Villarreal-González ◽  
Antonio J. Acosta-Hoyos ◽  
Jaime A. Garzon-Ochoa ◽  
Nataly J. Galán-Freyle ◽  
Paola Amar-Sepúlveda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Big Data ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Binary Classification ◽  
Simulated Data ◽  
Classification Model ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Simon Bolivar ◽  
Polymerase Chain ◽  
Available Information

Real-time reverse transcription (RT) PCR is the gold standard for detecting Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), owing to its sensitivity and specificity, thereby meeting the demand for the rising number of cases. The scarcity of trained molecular biologists for analyzing PCR results makes data verification a challenge. Artificial intelligence (AI) was designed to ease verification, by detecting atypical profiles in PCR curves caused by contamination or artifacts. Four classes of simulated real-time RT-PCR curves were generated, namely, positive, early, no, and abnormal amplifications. Machine learning (ML) models were generated and tested using small amounts of data from each class. The best model was used for classifying the big data obtained by the Virology Laboratory of Simon Bolivar University from real-time RT-PCR curves for SARS-CoV-2, and the model was retrained and implemented in a software that correlated patient data with test and AI diagnoses. The best strategy for AI included a binary classification model, which was generated from simulated data, where data analyzed by the first model were classified as either positive or negative and abnormal. To differentiate between negative and abnormal, the data were reevaluated using the second model. In the first model, the data required preanalysis through a combination of prepossessing. The early amplification class was eliminated from the models because the numbers of cases in big data was negligible. ML models can be created from simulated data using minimum available information. During analysis, changes or variations can be incorporated by generating simulated data, avoiding the incorporation of large amounts of experimental data encompassing all possible changes. For diagnosing SARS-CoV-2, this type of AI is critical for optimizing PCR tests because it enables rapid diagnosis and reduces false positives. Our method can also be used for other types of molecular analyses.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document