Genetic and immunological biomarkers predict metastatic disease recurrence in stage III colon cancer

562 Background: Current staging of patients (pts) with pathological stage III colon cancer is suboptimal; many pts still recur despite unremarkable preoperative staging work-up. We previously reported that early postoperative PET-CT can alter the stage and management of pts with high risk stage III colon cancer in up to 19% of patients. The aim of the current study was to expand the previous one to a larger cohort and to determine the role of early postoperative PET-CT in the general population of stage III colon cancer pts, regardless of their individual risk. Methods: A retrospective chart review of all consecutive pts with stage III colon cancer who underwent early postoperative PET-CT between 2007 and 2016. Demographic and clinicopathological data were collected. Results: 247 pts, 124 (50%) males, with a median age of 66 years (range, 30-92), were included. Pathological stage was IIIA, IIIB and IIIC in 18 (7.3%), 161 (65.1%) and 72 (29.1%) pts, respectively. The median number of lymph nodes retrieved was 15 (range, 6-64) and that of positive lymph nodes was 2 (range, 0-21). High FDG-uptake was observed in 52 (21.0%) pts, including 6 (2.4%) who had clear postoperative changes, 10 (4.0%) who had a false positive abnormal uptake of whom 6 underwent invasive diagnostic procedures. The PET-CT results modified the management of 36 pts (14.5%) who were found to have true positive findings: 30 (12.1%) were proven to have overt metastatic disease and in 6 (2.4%) a second primary was discovered. With the median follow-up of 39.0 months (range 7.2-98.4 months), of the 30 pts found to be metastatic, 10 (33.3%) underwent curative treatments and are currently with no evidence of disease (NED). Updated data, on more patients and a longer follow-up, will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: Early postoperative PET-CT changed the staging and treatment of 14.5% of resected stage III pts, and has the potential for early detection of curable metastatic disease. We currently evaluate this strategy and its actual impact in a prospective trial.

Download Full-text

Prognosis of microsatellite instability and/or mismatch repair deficiency stage III colon cancer patients after disease recurrence: Results of an accent meta-analysis of seven studies.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.3525 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 3525-3525 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Julien Taieb ◽

Levi Pederson ◽

Qian Shi ◽

Steven R Alberts ◽

Norman Wolmark ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Colon Cancer ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Mismatch Repair ◽

Statistical Significance ◽

Multivariable Analysis ◽

Disease Recurrence ◽

Stage Iii ◽

Wild Type ◽

Poor Prognostic Factor ◽

Stage Iii Colon Cancer

3525 Background: Microsatellite instable/deficient mismatch repair (MSI) metastatic colorectal cancers have been reported to be of poor prognosis. The interaction between MSI and BRAFV600E mutation complicates the picture. Methods: Patients with resected stage III CC from 7 studies with disease recurrence and data available for MSI and BRAFV600E status were analyzed. The primary endpoint was survival after recurrence (SAR) to assess the prognostic roles of MSI and BRAFV600E, respectively. Associations of markers with SAR were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for clinicopathologic features (data collected 12/1998 to 11/2009). Results: Among 2630 patients with cancer recurrence (1491 men [56.7%], mean age, 58.5 [19-85] years), multivariable analysis revealed that patients with MSI tumors (n = 220) had significantly better SAR (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.82; 95% CI, 0.69-0.98; P = .029) than patients with microsatellite stable /proficient MMR (MSS) tumors (n = 1766). This was also observed when looking at patients treated by the standard FOLFOX adjuvant regimen only (aHR, 0.76; 0.58-1.00; P = .048). Same trends were observed when looking at MSI/dMMR patients outcome in BRAFV600E wild-type (aHR, 0.84; P = .10) and mutant (aHR, 0.88; P = .43) subgroups separately, without reaching statistical significance. As previously described poor SAR was observed in BRAFV600E mutants vs wild type patients (n = 244; aHR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.73-2.46; P < .0001) and this was also true in BRAFV600E mutants MSI/dMMR patients (n = 77, aHR, 2.65 ; 95% CI, 1.67-4.21; p < .0001). Other factors associated with a poor SAR were : olderage, male gender, T4/N2, proximal primary tumor location, poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma, and early recurrence (by 1y increase). Conclusions: In stage III colon cancer patients recurring after adjuvant chemotherapy and before the era of immuno-oncologic agents, MSI/dMMR was associated with a better survival compared to MSS. BRAFV600E mutation seems to be a poor prognostic factor for both MSI/dMMR and MSS/pMMR patients.

Download Full-text

Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage III Colon Cancer

Cancers ◽

10.3390/cancers12092679 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 12 (9) ◽

pp. 2679 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Julien Taieb ◽

Claire Gallois

Keyword(s):

Colon Cancer ◽

Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽

Adjuvant Treatment ◽

Standard Of Care ◽

Disease Recurrence ◽

Stage Iii ◽

Clinical Practices ◽

Duration Of Treatment ◽

Risk Of Recurrence ◽

Stage Iii Colon Cancer

In patients with stage III colon cancer (CC), adjuvant chemotherapy with the combination of oxapliplatin to a fluoropyrimidine (FOLFOX or CAPOX) is a standard of care. The duration of treatment can be reduced from 6 months to 3 months, depending on the regimen, for patients at low risk of recurrence, without loss of effectiveness and allowing a significant reduction in the risk of cumulative sensitive neuropathy. However, our capacity to identify patients that do really need this doublet adjuvant treatment remains limited. In fact, only 30% at the most will actually benefit from this adjuvant treatment, 50% of them being already cured by the surgery and 20% of them experiencing disease recurrence despite the adjuvant treatment. Thus, it is necessary to be able to better predict individually for each patient the risk of recurrence and the need for adjuvant chemotherapy together with the need of new treatment approaches for specific subgroups. Many biomarkers have been described with their own prognostic weight, without leading to any change in clinical practices for now. In this review, we will first discuss the recommendations for adjuvant chemotherapy, and then the different biomarkers described and the future perspectives for the management of stage III CC.

Download Full-text

Histopathological Predictors of Recurrence in Stage III Colon Cancer: Reappraisal of Tumor Deposits and Tumor Budding Using AJCC8 Criteria

International Journal of Surgical Pathology ◽

10.1177/1066896918787275 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 27 (2) ◽

pp. 147-158 ◽

Cited By ~ 8

Author(s):

Michael A. Landau ◽

Benjamin Zhu ◽

Frances N. Akwuole ◽

Reetesh K. Pai

Keyword(s):

Colon Cancer ◽

Multivariable Analysis ◽

Disease Free Survival ◽

Disease Recurrence ◽

Stage Iii ◽

Tumor Budding ◽

Stage Iii Colon Cancer ◽

Predictors Of Recurrence ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Cancer Tumor

Patients with stage III colonic adenocarcinoma have a spectrum of risk for recurrent disease, and histopathological variables that predict recurrence can help stratify patients into prognostic groups. To identify histopathological predictors of recurrence, we investigated the effect of implementation of the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC8) staging system definition of tumor deposits and International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference (ITBCC) criteria for tumor budding compared with other known prognostic variables in 256 resected colonic adenocarcinomas, including 150 stage III and 106 stage II tumors. In stage III colon cancer, tumor deposits and high tumor budding were the only independent histological variables that predicted disease recurrence. In a multivariable analysis in stage III colon cancer, tumor deposits and high tumor budding were associated with a 2.2- and 1.5-fold increased risk of developing disease recurrence, respectively (95% CI = 1.1-4,2, P = .02, and 95% CI = 1.1-2.1, P = .01, respectively). The negative prognostic effect of tumor deposits was most pronounced in patients with stage IIIB disease in which tumor deposits were associated with a 3.2-fold increased risk of disease recurrence (95% CI = 1.4-7.1; P = .005). Within the N1 cohort, patients with tumor deposits without concurrent positive lymph nodes (N1c) had a significantly decreased disease-free survival compared with patients with N0 tumors ( P < .001) and patients with N1a/b tumors ( P = .02). As independent risk factors for recurrence, tumor deposits and high tumor budding are important histopathological variables and should be included as a part of a routine comprehensive pathological risk assessment in stage III colon cancer.

Download Full-text