scholarly journals Impact of national influenza vaccination strategy in severe influenza outcomes among the high-risk Portuguese population

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ausenda Machado ◽  
Irina Kislaya ◽  
Amparo Larrauri ◽  
Carlos Matias Dias ◽  
Baltazar Nunes
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Influenza Vaccination ◽  
Seasonal Influenza ◽  
Vaccine Coverage ◽  
Vaccination Strategy ◽  
High Risk Population ◽  
Risk Population ◽  
Seasonal Influenza Vaccination ◽  
Severe Influenza ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background All aged individuals with a chronic condition and those with 65 and more years are at increased risk of severe influenza post-infection complications. There is limited research on cases averted by the yearly vaccination programs in high-risk individuals. The objective was to estimate the impact of trivalent seasonal influenza vaccination on averted hospitalizations and death among the high-risk population in Portugal. Methods The impact of trivalent seasonal influenza vaccination was estimated using vaccine coverage, vaccine effectiveness and the number of influenza-related hospitalizations and deaths. The number of averted events (NAE), prevented fraction (PF) and number needed to vaccinate (NVN) were estimated for seasons 2014/15 to 2016/17. Results The vaccination strategy averted on average approximately 1833 hospitalizations and 383 deaths per season. Highest NAE was observed in the ≥65 years population (85% of hospitalizations and 95% deaths) and in the 2016/17 season (1957 hospitalizations and 439 deaths). On average, seasonal vaccination prevented 21% of hospitalizations in the population aged 65 and more, and 18.5% in the population with chronic conditions. The vaccination also prevented 29% and 19.5% of deaths in each group of the high-risk population. It would be needed to vaccinate 3360 high-risk individuals, to prevent one hospitalization and 60,471 high-risk individuals to prevent one death. Conclusion The yearly influenza vaccination campaigns had a sustained positive benefit for the high-risk population, reducing hospitalizations and deaths. These results can support public health plans toward increased vaccine coverage in high-risk groups.

scholarly journals Cisplatin +/− rucaparib after preoperative chemotherapy in patients with triple-negative or BRCA mutated breast cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maitri Kalra ◽  
Yan Tong ◽  
David R. Jones ◽  
Tom Walsh ◽  
Michael A. Danso ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Parp Inhibition ◽  
High Risk Population ◽  
Risk Population ◽  
The Impact

AbstractPatients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) who have residual disease after neoadjuvant therapy have a high risk of recurrence. We tested the impact of DNA-damaging chemotherapy alone or with PARP inhibition in this high-risk population. Patients with TNBC or deleterious BRCA mutation (TNBC/BRCAmut) who had >2 cm of invasive disease in the breast or persistent lymph node (LN) involvement after neoadjuvant therapy were assigned 1:1 to cisplatin alone or with rucaparib. Germline mutations were identified with BROCA analysis. The primary endpoint was 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) with 80% power to detect an HR 0.5. From Feb 2010 to May 2013, 128 patients were enrolled. Median tumor size at surgery was 1.9 cm (0–11.5 cm) with 1 (0–38) involved LN; median Residual Cancer Burden (RCB) score was 2.6. Six patients had known deleterious BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations at study entry, but BROCA identified deleterious mutations in 22% of patients with available samples. Toxicity was similar in both arms. Despite frequent dose reductions (21% of patients) and delays (43.8% of patients), 73% of patients completed planned cisplatin. Rucaparib exposure was limited with median concentration 275 (82–4694) ng/mL post-infusion on day 3. The addition of rucaparib to cisplatin did not increase 2-year DFS (54.2% cisplatin vs. 64.1% cisplatin + rucaparib; P = 0.29). In the high-risk post preoperative TNBC/BRCAmut setting, the addition of low-dose rucaparib did not improve 2-year DFS or increase the toxicity of cisplatin. Genetic testing was underutilized in this high-risk population.

Abstract 2143: Improved Long-Term Survival in a High Risk Population Following Drug Eluting Stent Availability

Circulation ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 116 (suppl_16) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maheer Gandhavadi ◽  
Kendrick A Shunk ◽  
Edward J McNulty
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Independent Predictor ◽  
Drug Eluting Stent ◽  
High Risk Population ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Risk Population ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
Drug Eluting ◽  
The Impact

Background Data regarding the impact of drug eluting stent (DES) use on long-term outcomes outside trial populations are limited. Methods 1,547 consecutive patients underwent stent implantation from January 2000 until December 2006 at the San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center. To assess the impact of DES availability on mortality, that population was partitioned into a pre-DES cohort (N=591) and a post-DES availability cohort (N=956). Kaplan-Meier survival curves for the two cohorts were compared. Results The entire population was relatively high risk: 37% had diabetes, 38% a reduced ejection fraction, and 53% a prior MI or elevated troponin prior to the procedure. Median follow up was 4.7 years for the pre-DES cohort and 1.8 years for the post-DES cohort. DES were used in 83% of procedures in the post-DES cohort. Survival improved significantly in the post-DES cohort (P = .04, Log Rank)(see Figure ). Baseline characteristics, procedural variables and discharge medications were analyzed in a Cox proportional hazards model (see Table ). DES use was an independent predictor of improved survival (Hazard Ratio for death 0.52, 95% CI .28–.95). Conclusions In an unselected, high risk population, long-term survival improved following the availability of drug eluting stents. After adjusting for potential confounding factors, DES use was an independent predictor of improved survival. Independent Predictors of Death in all 1,547 Patients

Seasonal Influenza Vaccination Patterns Among Pregnant Women in New Mexico

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 214-223
Author(s):  
Upasana Chalise ◽  
Jill A. McDonald ◽  
Anup Amatya ◽  
Martha Morales
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
New Mexico ◽  
Influenza Vaccination ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Seasonal Influenza ◽  
Vaccine Coverage ◽  
The United States ◽  
Vaccination Rate ◽  
Seasonal Influenza Vaccination ◽  
Border States

Introduction: Seasonal influenza vaccination is recommended for pregnant women, but half of the pregnant women in the United States remain unvaccinated. Vaccine coverage in U.S.–Mexico border states has not been examined in depth even though risk factors for low vaccine coverage exist in these states, especially in the counties bordering Mexico. Method: Using 2012-2014 New Mexico (NM) Pregnancy Risk Assessment and Monitoring System data, this study examined the weighted annual seasonal influenza vaccination rates and the relationship of various factors to vaccination among NM residents with a live birth during those years. Results: Among respondents, 53.8% were Hispanic, 15.7% were Native American, and 30.5% were non-Hispanic White. The vaccination rate in NM increased from 49.0% in 2012 to 64.8% in 2014. The adjusted odds of vaccination were higher among women whose health care provider recommended/offered vaccination during the year prior to delivery compared to women whose provider did not (AOR = 11.92, 95% confidence interval [CI: 9.86, 14.42]) and among those living in the U.S.–Mexico nonborder counties compared to those living in the border counties (AOR = 1.23, 95% CI [1.18, 1.25]). Conclusion: Efforts to increase the vaccination rate among pregnant women in border states should concentrate on health care providers and the highest risk women, such as those resident in the border region.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document