All coffee types decrease the risk of adverse clinical outcomes in chronic liver disease: a UK Biobank study

Background: Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) with acute respiratory distress syndrome is a life-threatening condition. A previous diagnosis of chronic liver disease is associated with poorer outcomes. Nevertheless, the impact of silent liver injury has not been investigated. We aimed to explore the association of pre-admission liver fibrosis indices with the prognosis of critically ill COVID-19 patients. Methods: The work presented was an observational study in 214 patients with COVID-19 consecutively admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Pre-admission liver fibrosis indices were calculated. In-hospital mortality and predictive factors were explored with Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analysis. Results: The mean age was 59.58 (13.79) years; 16 patients (7.48%) had previously recognised chronic liver disease. Up to 78.84% of patients according to Forns, and 45.76% according to FIB-4, had more than minimal fibrosis. Fibrosis indices were higher in non-survivors [Forns: 6.04 (1.42) versus 4.99 (1.58), p < 0.001; FIB-4: 1.77 (1.17) versus 1.41 (0.91), p = 0.020)], but no differences were found in liver biochemistry parameters. Patients with any degree of fibrosis either by Forns or FIB-4 had a higher mortality, which increased according to the severity of fibrosis ( p < 0.05 for both indexes). Both Forns [HR 1.41 (1.11–1.81); p = 0.006] and FIB-4 [HR 1.31 (0.99–1.72); p = 0.051] were independently related to survival after adjusting for the Charlson comorbidity index, APACHE II, and ferritin. Conclusion: Unrecognised liver fibrosis, assessed by serological tests prior to admission, is independently associated with a higher risk of death in patients with severe COVID-19 admitted to the ICU.

Download Full-text

Coffee Consumption and the Progression of NAFLD: A Systematic Review

Nutrients ◽

10.3390/nu13072381 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 13 (7) ◽

pp. 2381

Author(s):

Rebecca Sewter ◽

Susan Heaney ◽

Amanda Patterson

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Liver Disease ◽

Chronic Liver Disease ◽

Coffee Consumption ◽

Developed Countries ◽

Chronic Liver ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Coffee Intake ◽

Alcoholic Fatty Liver ◽

The Impact

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the leading cause of chronic liver disease in developed countries. Coffee is one of the most consumed beverages in the world and has been shown to be beneficial in limiting progression in chronic liver disease in general. However, research surrounding the impact of coffee consumption on NAFLD progression is limited. This systematic review aimed to investigate the relationship between coffee consumption and the progression of liver disease, specifically for cases of NAFLD. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, and Scopus were searched for published studies that evaluated the effects of coffee consumption on the progression of NAFLD. The results are presented in a narrative synthesis with principal summary measures, including odds ratios, p-values, and differences in mean coffee intake in relation to severity of NAFLD. Five studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. There was no trial evidence among NAFLD patients, rather all studies were of a cross-sectional design. Using the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Quality Criteria Checklist, four studies received a positive rating, with the remaining study receiving a neutral rating. Overall, four out of the five studies reported a statistically significant relationship between coffee consumption and the severity of fibrosis. Methods around capturing and defining coffee consumption were heterogeneous and therefore an effective dose could not be elucidated. Results suggest that higher coffee consumption is inversely associated with the severity of hepatic fibrosis in individuals with NAFLD. However, further research is required to elucidate the optimum quantity and form/preparation of coffee required to exert this hepatoprotective role.

Download Full-text

Unrecognized liver injury assessed by fibrosis indexes is associated with mortality in critically ill COVID-19 patients

10.21203/rs.3.rs-83678/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Mario Romero-Cristobal ◽

Ana Clemente ◽

Patricia Piñeiro ◽

Jamil Cedeño ◽

Laura Rayón ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Liver Disease ◽

Liver Fibrosis ◽

Liver Injury ◽

Chronic Liver Disease ◽

Critically Ill ◽

Cox Regression ◽

Chronic Liver ◽

Cox Regression Analysis ◽

Risk Of Death ◽

The Impact

Abstract Background Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) with acute respiratory distress syndrome is a life-threatening condition. A previous diagnosis of chronic liver disease is associated with poorer outcomes. Nevertheless, the impact of silent liver injury has not been investigated. We aimed to explore the association of pre-admission liver fibrosis indexes with the prognosis of critically ill COVID-19 patients.Methods Observational study in 214 patients with COVID-19 consecutively admitted to the ICU. Pre-admission liver fibrosis indexes were calculated. In-hospital mortality and predictive factors were explored with Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis.Results The mean age was 59.58 (13.79) years. Sixteen patients (7.48%) had previously recognized chronic liver disease. Up to 78.84% of patients according to Forns, and 45.76% according to FIB-4, had more than minimal fibrosis. Fibrosis indexes were higher in non-survivors [Forns: 6.04 (1.42) vs 4.99 (1.58), p < 0.001; FIB-4: 1.77 (1.17) vs 1.41 (0.91), p = 0.020)], but no differences were found in liver biochemistry parameters. Patients with any degree of fibrosis either by Forns or FIB-4 had a higher mortality, which increased according to the severity of fibrosis (p < 0.05 for both indexes). Both Forns [HR 1.41 (1.11-1.81); p = 0.006] and FIB-4 [HR 1.31 (0.99-1.72); p = 0.051] were independently related to survival after adjusting for the Charlson Comorbidity Index, APACHE II and ferritin.Conclusion Unrecognized liver fibrosis, assessed by serological tests prior to admission, is independently associated with a higher risk of death in patients with severe COVID-19 admitted to the ICU.

Download Full-text

I drink for my liver, Doc: emerging evidence that coffee prevents cirrhosis

F1000Research ◽

10.12688/f1000research.6368.1 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 4 ◽

pp. 95

Author(s):

Jordan J. Feld ◽

Élise G. Lavoie ◽

Michel Fausther ◽

Jonathan A. Dranoff

Keyword(s):

Liver Disease ◽

Liver Fibrosis ◽

Chronic Liver Disease ◽

Chemical Constituents ◽

Coffee Consumption ◽

Epidemiological Data ◽

Chronic Liver ◽

Caffeine Consumption ◽

Decaffeinated Coffee ◽

Pharmacologic Treatments

Evidence demonstrating that regular ingestion of coffee has salutary effects on patients with chronic liver disease is accumulating rapidly. Specifically, it appears that coffee ingestion can slow the progression of liver fibrosis, preventing cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This should excite clinicians and scientists alike, since these observations, if true, would create effective, testable hypotheses that should lead to improved understanding on fibrosis pathogenesis and thus may generate novel pharmacologic treatments of patients with chronic liver disease.This review is designed to examine the relevant clinical and epidemiological data in critical fashion and to examine the putative pharmacological effects of coffee relevant to the pathogenesis of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. We hope that this will inspire relevant critical analyses, especially among “coffee skeptics”. Of note, one major assumption made by this review is that the bulk of the effects of coffee consumption are mediated by caffeine, rather than by other chemical constituents of coffee. Our rationales for this assumption are threefold: first, caffeine’s effects on adenosinergic signaling provide testable hypotheses; second, although there are myriad chemical constituents of coffee, they are present in very low concentrations, and perhaps more importantly, vary greatly between coffee products and production methods (it is important to note that we do not dismiss the “botanical” hypothesis here; rather, we do not emphasize it at present due to the limitations of the studies examined); lastly, some (but not all) observational studies have examined both coffee and non-coffee caffeine consumption and found consistent effects, and when examined, no benefit to decaffeinated coffee has been observed. Further, in the interval since we examined this phenomenon last, further evidence has accumulated supporting caffeine as the effector molecule for coffee’s salutary effects.

Download Full-text

Late diagnosis of chronic liver disease in a community cohort (UK biobank): determinants and impact on subsequent survival

Public Health ◽

10.1016/j.puhe.2020.07.017 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 187 ◽

pp. 165-171

Author(s):

H. Innes ◽

J.R. Morling ◽

E.A. Aspinall ◽

D.J. Goldberg ◽

S.J. Hutchinson ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Liver Disease ◽

Chronic Liver Disease ◽

Chronic Liver ◽

Late Diagnosis ◽

Uk Biobank

Download Full-text

I drink for my liver, Doc: emerging evidence that coffee prevents cirrhosis

F1000Research ◽

10.12688/f1000research.6368.2 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 4 ◽

pp. 95 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

Jordan J. Feld ◽

Élise G. Lavoie ◽

Michel Fausther ◽

Jonathan A. Dranoff

Keyword(s):

Liver Disease ◽

Liver Fibrosis ◽

Chronic Liver Disease ◽

Chemical Constituents ◽

Coffee Consumption ◽

Epidemiological Data ◽

Chronic Liver ◽

Caffeine Consumption ◽

Decaffeinated Coffee ◽

Pharmacologic Treatments

Evidence demonstrating that regular ingestion of coffee has salutary effects on patients with chronic liver disease is accumulating rapidly. Specifically, it appears that coffee ingestion can slow the progression of liver fibrosis, preventing cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This should excite clinicians and scientists alike, since these observations, if true, would create effective, testable hypotheses that should lead to improved understanding on fibrosis pathogenesis and thus may generate novel pharmacologic treatments of patients with chronic liver disease.This review is designed to examine the relevant clinical and epidemiological data in critical fashion and to examine the putative pharmacological effects of coffee relevant to the pathogenesis of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. We hope that this will inspire relevant critical analyses, especially among “coffee skeptics”. Of note, one major assumption made by this review is that the bulk of the effects of coffee consumption are mediated by caffeine, rather than by other chemical constituents of coffee. Our rationales for this assumption are threefold: first, caffeine’s effects on adenosinergic signaling provide testable hypotheses; second, although there are myriad chemical constituents of coffee, they are present in very low concentrations, and perhaps more importantly, vary greatly between coffee products and production methods (it is important to note that we do not dismiss the “botanical” hypothesis here; rather, we do not emphasize it at present due to the limitations of the studies examined); lastly, some (but not all) observational studies have examined both coffee and non-coffee caffeine consumption and found consistent effects, and when examined, no benefit to decaffeinated coffee has been observed. Further, in the interval since we examined this phenomenon last, further evidence has accumulated supporting caffeine as the effector molecule for coffee’s salutary effects.

Download Full-text

Risk of severe COVID-19 and mortality in patients with established chronic liver disease: a nationwide matched cohort study

BMC Gastroenterology ◽

10.1186/s12876-021-02017-8 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 21 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Tracey G. Simon ◽

Hannes Hagström ◽

Rajani Sharma ◽

Jonas Söderling ◽

Bjorn Roelstraete ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cohort Study ◽

Liver Disease ◽

General Population ◽

Chronic Liver Disease ◽

Cox Regression ◽

Severe Disease ◽

Chronic Liver ◽

Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Population Controls

Abstract Background and aims Some, but not all, prior studies have suggested that patients with chronic liver disease are at increased risk of contracting COVID-19 and developing more severe disease. However, nationwide data are lacking from well-phenotyped cohorts with liver histology and comparisons to matched general population controls. Methods We conducted a nationwide cohort study of all Swedish adults with chronic liver disease (CLD) confirmed by liver biopsy between 1966 and 2017 (n = 42,320), who were alive on February 1, 2020. CLD cases were matched to ≤ 5 population comparators by age, sex, calendar year and county (n = 182,147). Using Cox regression, we estimated multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for COVID-19 hospitalization and severe COVID-19 (intensive care admission or death due to COVID-19). Results Between February 1 and July 31, 2020, 161 (0.38%) CLD patients and 435 (0.24%) general population controls were hospitalized with COVID-19 (aHR = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.11–1.66), while 65 (0.15%) CLD patients and 191 (0.10%) controls developed severe COVID-19 (aHR = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.79–1.48). Results were similar in patients with CLD due to alcohol use, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, viral hepatitis, autoimmune hepatitis, and other etiologies. Among patients with cirrhosis (n = 2549), the aHRs for COVID-19 hospitalization and for severe COVID-19 were 1.08 (95% CI 0.48–2.40) and 1.23 (95% CI = 0.37–4.04), respectively, compared to controls. Moreover, among all patients diagnosed with COVID-19, the presence of underlying CLD was not associated with increased mortality (aHR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.61–1.19). Conclusions In this nationwide cohort, patients with CLD had a higher risk of hospitalization for COVID-19 compared to the general population, but they did not have an increased risk of developing severe COVID-19.

Download Full-text