scholarly journals Diagnostic yield, safety, and impact of transbronchial lung biopsy in mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients: a retrospective study

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Ghiani ◽  
Claus Neurohr
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Lung Biopsy ◽  
Diagnostic Yield ◽  
Transbronchial Lung Biopsy ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated ◽  
Valuable Alternative ◽  
Pulmonary Infiltrates ◽  
Histopathological Result

Abstract Background Pulmonary infiltrates of variable etiology are one of the main reasons for hypoxemic respiratory failure leading to invasive mechanical ventilation. If pulmonary infiltrates remain unexplained or progress despite treatment, the histopathological result of a lung biopsy could have significant impact on change in therapy. Surgical lung biopsy is the commonly used technique, but due to its considerable morbidity and mortality, less invasive bronchoscopic transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB) may be a valuable alternative. Methods Retrospective, monocentric, observational study in mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients, subjected to TBLB due to unexplained pulmonary infiltrates in the period January 2014 to July 2019. Patients’ medical records were reviewed to obtain data on baseline clinical characteristics, modality and adverse events (AE) of the TBLB, and impact of the histopathological results on treatment decisions. A multivariable binary logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of AE and hospital mortality, and survival curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results Forty-two patients with in total 42 TBLB procedures after a median of 12 days of mechanical ventilation were analyzed, of which 16.7% were immunosuppressed, but there was no patient with prior lung transplantation. Diagnostic yield of TBLB was 88.1%, with AE occurring in 11.9% (most common pneumothorax and minor bleeding). 92.9% of the procedures were performed as a forceps biopsy, with organizing pneumonia (OP) as the most common histological diagnosis (54.8%). Variables independently associated with hospital mortality were age (odds ratio 1.070, 95%CI 1.006–1.138; p = 0.031) and the presence of OP (0.182, [0.036–0.926]; p = 0.040), the latter being confirmed in the survival analysis (log-rank p = 0.040). In contrast, a change in therapy based on histopathology alone occurred in 40.5%, and there was no evidence of improved survival in those patients. Conclusions Transbronchial lung biopsy remains a valuable alternative to surgical lung biopsy in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients. However, the high diagnostic yield must be weighed against potential adverse events and limited consequence of the histopathological result regarding treatment decisions in such patients.

scholarly journals Diagnostic yield, safety and impact of transbronchial lung biopsy in mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients: a retrospective study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Ghiani ◽  
Claus Neurohr
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Lung Biopsy ◽  
Diagnostic Yield ◽  
Transbronchial Lung Biopsy ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated ◽  
Valuable Alternative ◽  
Pulmonary Infiltrates

Abstract Background: Pulmonary infiltrates of variable etiology are one of the main reasons for hypoxemic respiratory failure leading to invasive mechanical ventilation. If pulmonary infiltrates remain unexplained or progress despite treatment, the histopathological result of a lung biopsy could have significant impact on change in therapy. Surgical lung biopsy is the commonly used technique, but due to its considerable morbidity and mortality, less invasive bronchoscopic transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB) may be a valuable alternative. Methods: Retrospective, monocentric, observational study in mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients, subjected to TBLB due to unexplained pulmonary infiltrates in the period January 2014 to July 2019. Patients` medical records were reviewed to obtain data on baseline clinical characteristics, modality and adverse events (AE) of the TBLB, and impact of the histopathological results on change in therapy. A multivariable binary logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of AE and hospital mortality, and survival curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Forty-two patients with in total 42 TBLB procedures after a median of 12 days of mechanical ventilation were analyzed, of which 16.7% were immunosuppressed, but there was no patient with prior lung transplantation. Diagnostic yield of the TBLB was 88.1%, with AE occurring in 11.9% (most common pneumothorax and minor bleeding). 92.9% of the procedures were performed as a forceps biopsy, with organizing pneumonia (OP) being the most common histological diagnosis (54.8%). Variables independently associated with hospital mortality were age (odds ratio 1.070, 95%CI 1.006–1.138; p = 0.031) and the presence of OP (0.182, [0.036–0.926]; p = 0.040), the latter being confirmed in the survival analysis (log-rank p = 0.040). In contrast, a change in therapy based on histopathology alone occurred in only 40.5%, and there was no evidence of a survival benefit in those patients. Conclusions: Transbronchial lung biopsy remains a valuable alternative to surgical lung biopsy in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients. However, the high diagnostic yield must be weighed against potential adverse events and limited consequence of the histological result regarding treatment decisions in such patients.

scholarly journals Diagnostic Yield, Safety and Impact of Transbronchial Lung Biopsy in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Ghiani ◽  
Claus Neurohr
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Lung Biopsy ◽  
Diagnostic Yield ◽  
Transbronchial Lung Biopsy ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated ◽  
Surgical Lung Biopsy

Abstract BackgroundPulmonary infiltrates of variable etiology are one of the main reasons for hypoxemic respiratory failure leading to invasive mechanical ventilation. If pulmonary infiltrates remain unexplained or progress despite treatment, the histopathological result of a lung biopsy could have significant impact on change in therapy. Surgical lung biopsy is the commonly used technique, but due to its considerable morbidity and mortality, less invasive bronchoscopic transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB) may be a valuable alternative.MethodsRetrospective, monocentric, observational study in mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients, subjected to TBLB due to unexplained pulmonary infiltrates in the period January 2014 to July 2019. Patients` medical records were reviewed to obtain data on baseline clinical characteristics, modality and adverse events (AE) of the TBLB, and impact of the histopathological results on change in therapy. A multivariable binary logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of AE and hospital mortality, and survival curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method.ResultsForty-two patients with in total 42 TBLB procedures after a median of 12 days of mechanical ventilation were analyzed, of which 16.7% were immunosuppressed, but there was no patient with prior lung transplantation. Diagnostic yield of the TBLB was 88.1%, with AE occurring in 11.9% (most common pneumothorax and minor bleeding). 92.9% of the procedures were performed as a forceps biopsy, with organizing pneumonia (OP) being the most common histological diagnosis (54.8%). Variables independently associated with hospital mortality were age (odds ratio 1.070, 95%CI 1.006–1.138; p = 0.031) and the presence of OP (0.182, [0.036–0.926]; p = 0.040), the latter being confirmed in the survival analysis (log-rank p = 0.040). In contrast, a change in therapy based on histopathology alone occurred in only 40.5%, and there was no evidence of a survival benefit in those patients.ConclusionsTransbronchial lung biopsy remains a valuable alternative to surgical lung biopsy in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients. However, the high diagnostic yield must be weighed against potential adverse events and limited consequence of the histological result regarding treatment decisions in such patients.

scholarly journals Etiology, incidence, and outcomes of patient–ventilator asynchrony in critically-ill patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yongfang Zhou ◽  
Steven R. Holets ◽  
Man Li ◽  
Gustavo A. Cortes-Puentes ◽  
Todd J. Meyer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated ◽  
History Of ◽  
Training Background ◽  
The Relationship

AbstractPatient–ventilator asynchrony (PVA) is commonly encountered during mechanical ventilation of critically ill patients. Estimates of PVA incidence vary widely. Type, risk factors, and consequences of PVA remain unclear. We aimed to measure the incidence and identify types of PVA, characterize risk factors for development, and explore the relationship between PVA and outcome among critically ill, mechanically ventilated adult patients admitted to medical, surgical, and medical-surgical intensive care units in a large academic institution staffed with varying provider training background. A single center, retrospective cohort study of all adult critically ill patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation for ≥ 12 h. A total of 676 patients who underwent 696 episodes of mechanical ventilation were included. Overall PVA occurred in 170 (24%) episodes. Double triggering 92(13%) was most common, followed by flow starvation 73(10%). A history of smoking, and pneumonia, sepsis, or ARDS were risk factors for overall PVA and double triggering (all P < 0.05). Compared with volume targeted ventilation, pressure targeted ventilation decreased the occurrence of events (all P < 0.01). During volume controlled synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation and pressure targeted ventilation, ventilator settings were associated with the incidence of overall PVA. The number of overall PVA, as well as double triggering and flow starvation specifically, were associated with worse outcomes and fewer hospital-free days (all P < 0.01). Double triggering and flow starvation are the most common PVA among critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients. Overall incidence as well as double triggering and flow starvation PVA specifically, portend worse outcome.

scholarly journals Selection strategy for sedation depth in critically ill patients on mechanical ventilation

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (S2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Longxiang Su ◽  
Chun Liu ◽  
Fengxiang Chang ◽  
Bo Tang ◽  
Lin Han ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Dimensionality Reduction ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Latent Profile Analysis ◽  
Profile Analysis ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated Patients ◽  
Sedation And Analgesia ◽  
Ventilated Patients

Abstract Background Analgesia and sedation therapy are commonly used for critically ill patients, especially mechanically ventilated patients. From the initial nonsedation programs to deep sedation and then to on-demand sedation, the understanding of sedation therapy continues to deepen. However, according to different patient’s condition, understanding the individual patient’s depth of sedation needs remains unclear. Methods The public open source critical illness database Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III was used in this study. Latent profile analysis was used as a clustering method to classify mechanically ventilated patients based on 36 variables. Principal component analysis dimensionality reduction was used to select the most influential variables. The ROC curve was used to evaluate the classification accuracy of the model. Results Based on 36 characteristic variables, we divided patients undergoing mechanical ventilation and sedation and analgesia into two categories with different mortality rates, then further reduced the dimensionality of the data and obtained the 9 variables that had the greatest impact on classification, most of which were ventilator parameters. According to the Richmond-ASS scores, the two phenotypes of patients had different degrees of sedation and analgesia, and the corresponding ventilator parameters were also significantly different. We divided the validation cohort into three different levels of sedation, revealing that patients with high ventilator conditions needed a deeper level of sedation, while patients with low ventilator conditions required reduction in the depth of sedation as soon as possible to promote recovery and avoid reinjury. Conclusion Through latent profile analysis and dimensionality reduction, we divided patients treated with mechanical ventilation and sedation and analgesia into two categories with different mortalities and obtained 9 variables that had the greatest impact on classification, which revealed that the depth of sedation was limited by the condition of the respiratory system.

scholarly journals Usefulness of lung biopsy in critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Marin-Corral ◽  
I Oliva ◽  
J Leache ◽  
L Claverias ◽  
V Blazquez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Lung Biopsy

scholarly journals Neuromonitoring of delirium with quantitative pupillometry In sedated mechanically ventilated critically ill patients

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Favre ◽  
Adriano Bernini ◽  
Paola Morelli ◽  
Jerôme Pasquier ◽  
John-Paul Miroz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Potential Utility ◽  
Icu Patients ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Infrared Pupillometry ◽  
Icu Delirium

Abstract Background. Intensive care unit (ICU) delirium is a frequent secondary neurological complication in critically ill patients undergoing prolonged mechanical ventilation. Quantitative pupillometry is an emerging modality for the neuromonitoring of primary acute brain injury, but its potential utility in patients at risk of ICU delirium is unknown. Methods. This was an observational cohort study of medical-surgical ICU patients, without acute or known primary brain injury, who underwent sedation and mechanical ventilation for at least 48 hours. Starting at day 3, automated infrared pupillometry – blinded to ICU caregivers – was used for repeated measurement of the pupillary function, including quantitative pupillary light reflex (q-PLR, expressed as % pupil constriction to a standardized light stimulus) and constriction velocity (CV, mm/sec). The relationship between delirium, using the CAM-ICU score, and quantitative pupillary variables was examined. Results. A total of 59/100 patients had ICU delirium, diagnosed at a median 8 (5-13) days from admission. Compared to non-delirious patients, subjects with ICU delirium had lower values of q-PLR (25 [19-31] vs. 20 [15-28] %) and CV (2.5 [1.7-2.8] vs. 1.7 [1.4-2.4] mm/sec) at day 3, and at all additional time-points tested ( p <0.05). After adjusting for the SOFA score and the cumulative dose of analgesia and sedation, lower q-PLR was associated with an increased risk of ICU delirium (OR 1.057 [1.007-1.113] at day 3; p =0.03). Conclusions. Sustained abnormalities of quantitative pupillary variables at the early ICU phase correlate with delirium and precede clinical diagnosis by a median 5 days. These findings suggest a potential utility of quantitative pupillometry in sedated mechanically ventilated ICU patients at high risk of delirium.

scholarly journals Non-cardio respiratory monitoring of mechanically ventilated critically ill patients

2019 ◽  
pp. S150-S159
Author(s):  
Chinmaya Kumar Panda ◽  
Habib Mohammad Reazaul Karim ◽  
Subrata Kumar Singha
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Multiple Organ ◽  
Respiratory Monitoring ◽  
Arterial Oxygen ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated

Critically ill patients often require multiple organ supports; respiratory support in terms of mechanical ventilation (MV) is one of the commonest. But, only providing an organ support contributes less to the complete well being of the patients. Moreover, MV itself can affect various physiological systems, metabolic response, and cause side effects. A very close temporal relationship exists between patients, monitoring and management decision too, and therefore, appropriate information from monitoring can lead to better outcomes. The present review is intended to briefly highlight the current opinions and strategies for non cardio-respiratory monitoring in such critically ill patients.Abbreviations: AKI-Acute Kidney Injury; APACHE-Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation; BPS-Behavioral Pain Scale; CAM-ICU-Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit; CPOT–Critical Care Pain Observation Tool; EVLWI-Extra vascular lung water index; FDA-Food and Drug Administration; ISO-International Organization for Standardization; ICU-Intensive Care Unit; LOS-Length of stay; MODS-Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score; MV-Mechanical Ventilation; PaO2-Partial pressure of arterial oxygen; FiO2-Fraction of inspired oxygen; SAPS-Simplified Acute Physiologic Score; RASS-Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale; SOFA-Sequential Organ Failure Assessment; SAS-Sedation Agitation Scale; UO-Urine outputCitation: Panda CK, Karim HMR, Singha SK. Non-cardio respiratory monitoring of mechanically ventilated critically ill patients. Anaesth Pain & Intensive Care 2018;22 Suppl 1:S150-S159Received: 9 Jul 2018 Reviewed: 1 Oct 2018 Corrected & Accepted: 9 Oct 2018

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document