scholarly journals One-minute stair climbing, 50-foot walk, and timed up-and-go were responsive measures for patients with chronic low back pain undergoing lumbar fusion surgery

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Max Jakobsson ◽  
Helena Brisby ◽  
Annelie Gutke ◽  
Mari Lundberg ◽  
Rob Smeets
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Chronic Low Back Pain ◽  
Lumbar Fusion ◽  
Stair Climbing ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Timed Up And Go ◽  
Fusion Surgery ◽  
Lumbar Fusion Surgery

scholarly journals Effect of the duration of chronic low back pain on pain sensitivity of patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery

Pain medicine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 8-15
Author(s):  
Mei-ping Qian ◽  
Mei-rong Dong ◽  
Fang Kang ◽  
Juan Li
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Chronic Low Back Pain ◽  
Pain Sensitivity ◽  
Lumbar Fusion ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Fusion Surgery ◽  
Lumbar Fusion Surgery

Background: chronic low back pain is a serious social problem. In recent years, patients who choose lumbar fusion surgery due to chronic low back pain has been increasing. Pre-existing chronic pain has been associated with severe postoperative pain. In this study, we have sought to prospectively analyze the association between the duration of chronic low back pain and pain sensitivity after lumbar fusion surgery. Methods: 400 patients who underwent lumbar fusion surgery were divided into three groups based on the duration of chronic pain. During the first postoperative day, the maximum pain scores of each patient day and night, the pain scores at the day of discharge, the consumption of postoperative analgesics and the length of hospital stay were recorded. Results: of 400 patients recruited, 369 patients completed the experiment. There was no significant difference in gender, age, height, weight, pre-operative pain at rest, and operation time in the three groups. During the day, the pain sensitivity of the three groups were 1.71 ± 0.66, 2.40 ± 0.74, 2.90 ± 0.80. During the night, the pain sensitivity of the three groups were 3.45 ± 0.81, 4.31 ± 1.06, 4.86 ± 1.05. At the day of discharge, the pain sensitivity of three groups were 1.26 ± 0.46, 1.47 ± 0.58, 1.96 ± 0.64. There were significant differences in pain sensitivity among the three groups during the day and night on the first postoperative day and at the day of discharge (p < 0.05). The length of hospital stay (7.31 ± 1.36 days, 8.82 ± 1.48 days, 9.60 ± 1.61 days) and analgesic consumption (25.04 ± 36.56 mg, 33.52 ± 24.04 mg, 45.15 ± 24.89 mg, morphine equivalent) were also significant differences (p < 0.05). Conclusion: we found the duration of chronic low back pain before lumbar fusion surgery affects patient’ postoperative pain sensitivity, consumption of analgesic drugs and hospital stay. The longer the preoperative chronic pain lasts, the higher the postoperative VAS score is, the more analgesic drugs were consumed, and the longer hospital stay is.

scholarly journals Treatment of low back pain elicited by superior cluneal nerve entrapment neuropathy after lumbar fusion surgery

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 152-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naotaka Iwamoto ◽  
Toyohiko Isu ◽  
Kyongsong Kim ◽  
Yasuhiro Chiba ◽  
Daijiro Morimoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Lumbar Fusion ◽  
Nerve Entrapment ◽  
Entrapment Neuropathy ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Fusion Surgery ◽  
Lumbar Fusion Surgery

scholarly journals Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 12: Pedicle screw fixation as an adjunct to posterolateral fusion

2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael W. Groff ◽  
Andrew T. Dailey ◽  
Zoher Ghogawala ◽  
Daniel K. Resnick ◽  
William C. Watters ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Chronic Low Back Pain ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Lumbar Fusion ◽  
Pedicle Screw Fixation ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Low Back

The utilization of pedicle screw fixation as an adjunct to posterolateral lumbar fusion (PLF) has become routine, but demonstration of a definitive benefit remains problematic. The medical evidence indicates that the addition of pedicle screw fixation to PLF increases fusion rates when assessed with dynamic radiographs. More recent evidence, since publication of the 2005 Lumbar Fusion Guidelines, suggests a stronger association between radiographic fusion and clinical outcome, although, even now, no clear correlation has been demonstrated. Although several reports suggest that clinical outcomes are improved with the addition of pedicle screw fixation, there are conflicting findings from similarly classified evidence. Furthermore, the largest contemporary, randomized, controlled study on this topic failed to demonstrate a significant clinical benefit with the use of pedicle screw fixation in patients undergoing PLF for chronic low-back pain. This absence of proof should not, however, be interpreted as proof of absence. Several limitations continue to compromise these investigations. For example, in the majority of studies the sample size is insufficient to detect small increments in clinical outcome that may be observed with pedicle screw fixation. Therefore, no definitive statement regarding the efficacy of pedicle screw fixation as a means to improve functional outcomes in patients undergoing PLF for chronic low-back pain can be made. There appears to be consistent evidence suggesting that pedicle screw fixation increases the costs and complication rate of PLF. High-risk patients, including (but not limited to) patients who smoke, patients who are undergoing revision surgery, or patients who suffer from medical conditions that may compromise fusion potential, may appreciate a greater benefit with supplemental pedicle screw fixation. It is recommended, therefore, that the use of pedicle screw fixation as a supplement to PLF be reserved for those patients in whom there is an increased risk of nonunion when treated with only PLF.

scholarly journals Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 8: Lumbar fusion for disc herniation and radiculopathy

2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey C. Wang ◽  
Andrew T. Dailey ◽  
Praveen V. Mummaneni ◽  
Zoher Ghogawala ◽  
Daniel K. Resnick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Chronic Low Back Pain ◽  
Lumbar Fusion ◽  
Signs And Symptoms ◽  
Herniated Disc ◽  
Spinal Instability ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Disc Herniations

Patients suffering from a lumbar herniated disc will typically present with signs and symptoms consistent with radiculopathy. They may also have low-back pain, however, and the source of this pain is less certain, as it may be from the degenerative process that led to the herniation. The surgical alternative of choice remains a lumbar discectomy, but fusions have been performed for both primary and recurrent disc herniations. In the original guidelines, the inclusion of a fusion for routine discectomies was not recommended. This recommendation continues to be supported by more recent evidence. Based on low-level evidence, the incorporation of a lumbar fusion may be considered an option when a herniation is associated with evidence of spinal instability, chronic low-back pain, and/or severe degenerative changes, or if the patient participates in heavy manual labor. For recurrent disc herniations, there is low-level evidence to support the inclusion of lumbar fusion for patients with evidence of instability or chronic low-back pain.

scholarly journals Symptoms and signs possibly indicating segmental, discogenic pain. A fusion study with 18 years of follow-up

2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 213-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo Nyström ◽  
Henrik Weber ◽  
Birgitta Schillberg ◽  
Adam Taube
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Prospective Studies ◽  
Chronic Low Back Pain ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Discogenic Pain ◽  
Fusion Surgery ◽  
Symptoms And Signs

AbstractBackgroundOnly two out of the five existing randomized studies have reported better results from fusion surgery for chronic low back pain (CLBP) compared to conservative treatment. In these studies the back symptoms of the patients were described simply as “chronic low back pain”. One possible reason for the modest results of surgery is the lack of a description of specified symptoms that might be related to a painful segment/disc, and patient selection may therefore be more or less a matter of chance. Previous prospective studies including facet joint injections and discography and eventually MRI have failed to identify patients with a painful segment/disc that will benefit from fusion surgery.PurposeOur purpose was to analyse in detail the pre-operative symptoms and signs presented by patients who showed substantial relief from their back pain following spinal fusion surgery with the aim of possibly finding a pain pattern indicating segmental, discogenic pain.MethodsWe analysed 40 consecutive patients, mean age 41 years, with a history of disabling low back pain for a mean of 7.7 years. Before surgery the patients completed a detailed questionnaire concerning various aspects of their back pain, and findings at clinical examination were thoroughly noted. Monosegmental posterior lumbar interbody fusion without internal fixation was performed using microsurgical technique. Outcome was assessed at 1, 2 and 4 years after surgery and finally at 18 years, using selfreporting measures and assessment by an independent examiner. Assessment at 18 years applied the Balanced Inventory for Spinal Disorders Questionnaire and the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.ResultsAccording to the independent observer’s assessment at two years 27 of the 40 patients were much improved. Analysis of the pre-operative depiction of the back symptoms of this group revealed a rather uniform pattern, the most important being: dominating back pain originating in the midline of the spine, with a dull, aching character and stabbing pain in the same area provoked by sudden movements. Most patients in this group also had diffuse pain radiation of various extension down one or both legs and often bladder dysfunction with frequency. At clinical examination, localized interspinal tenderness was observed within the spinal area in question and the patient’s back pain was provoked by pressure in that area and by tapping a neighbouring spinous process.At 18 years after surgery 19 patients assessed themselves as much improved. At that time 5 of them had pension due to age, 7 early pension, one worked full time and six patients part time. Eleven patients were re-operated due to defect bony healing.ConclusionsThe results may suggest that the use of a detailed symptom analysis and clinical examination may make it possible to select a subgroup of patients within the CLBP group likely to have better outcome following fusion surgery.ImplicationsThe next step would be to execute prospective studies and if our findings concerning back pain details and signs among CLPB patients can be confirmed this can provide for more accurate selection of patients suitable for fusion surgery.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document