scholarly journals The social validity of a national assessment centre for selection into general practice training

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Annette Burgess ◽  
Chris Roberts ◽  
Tyler Clark ◽  
Karyn Mossman
1983 ◽  
Vol 47 (12) ◽  
pp. 767-770
Author(s):  
SL Handelman ◽  
PM Brunette ◽  
ES Solomon

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonardo Martins Barbosa ◽  
Sheila Giardini Murta

AbstractThe literature shows that retirement can bring both positive and negative effects. However, there are few tested interventions for preparing workers for this transition and avoiding or minimizing its negative impacts. This paper presents a study with multiple groups that examined the social validity of an intervention for retirement education grounded in contextual behavioral science and acceptance and commitment therapy. Twenty-seven workers aged 29 to 65 divided into three intervention groups participated (group 1, N = 15; group 2, N = 9; group 3, N = 3). According to the participants’ evaluations, the intervention provided socially valid goals, socially acceptable procedures, and socially important effects. However, some improvements are still needed, such as the use of more dynamic methods, better formatted printed material, and increased fidelity between the content’s implementation and the prescribed activities. The positive results indicate that contextual behavioral science may bolster the development of interventions whose components possess evidence for their social validity. The further evaluation of the intervention via a clinical trial study will offer more robust evidence for its effectiveness. It is hoped that by increasing the availability of theory-based interventions in this area, the present study will promote valid strategies to facilitate better adjustment to retirement.


2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 287-295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie José Aires ◽  
Rémi Gagnayre ◽  
Olivia Gross ◽  
Cam-Anh Khau ◽  
Sophie Haghighi ◽  
...  

Background: Patient teachers were involved in training general practice residents (GPRs) to strengthen the patient-centered approach. They teach a course on health democracy by themselves and teach in tandem with a physician teacher during reflective practice-based classes (named GEPRIs). We present the GPRs’ representations of patient teacher characteristics and capacities and their perception of how useful patient teachers are to their professional development. Methods: We administered a questionnaire based on a preliminary qualitative study to 124 GPRs. It explored (a) changes in the GPRs’ representations about patient teacher characteristics and capacities with regard to teaching over the first year of the experiment; (b) GPRs’ perception of patient teacher utility to their training and their contribution to developing patient perspective–related competencies. Results: The response rate was 89.5% (111/124). The majority of GPRs agreed with 17 (before) and 21 (after) of the 23 patient teacher characteristics and with 17 (before) and 19 (after) of the 20 capacities. The agreement rate increased, overall, after patient teacher participation. The GPRs found patient teacher useful to their training in 9 of 11 topics (agreement rate 65%-92%). They felt they had developed the 14 patient knowledge–related competencies (agreement rate 62%-93%), and 52% to 75% of the GPRs rated the patient teachers’ contribution to those competencies “high or very high,” depending on the competency. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the specific contribution of patient teachers to university-level medical training in France. The GPRs recognized that patient teachers helped them develop competencies by providing patient-specific content.


2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 357-366 ◽  
Author(s):  
Er Tsing Vivian Tng ◽  
Amanda Tapley ◽  
Andrew Davey ◽  
Sally De Zwaan ◽  
Simon Morgan ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carl J. Dunst

Findings from three field tests evaluations of early childhood intervention practitioner performance checklists and three parent practice guides are reported. Forty-two practitioners from three early childhood intervention programs reviewed the checklists and practice guides and made (1) social validity judgments of both products, (2) judgments of the compatibility of the checklists and practice guides, and (3) suggestions for improving the intervention products and materials. Results showed that practitioner feedback and suggestions yielded valuable information for improving the products where changes made in response to the practitioners’ social validity ratings and suggestions from the first field test had discernible effects on judgments and feedback of revised products. The importance of striving to develop intervention products and materials that are judged as socially important and acceptable is described.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document