scholarly journals Natriuretic peptides for the detection of diastolic dysfunction and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction—a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMC Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon Remmelzwaal ◽  
Adriana J. van Ballegooijen ◽  
Linda J. Schoonmade ◽  
Elisa Dal Canto ◽  
M. Louis Handoko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Diastolic Dysfunction ◽  
Natriuretic Peptides ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Acute Setting ◽  
Rule Out

Abstract Background An overview of the diagnostic performance of natriuretic peptides (NPs) for the detection of diastolic dysfunction (DD) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), in a non-acute setting, is currently lacking. Methods We performed a systematic literature search in PubMed and Embase.com (May 13, 2019). Studies were included when they (1) reported diagnostic performance measures, (2) are for the detection of DD or HFpEF in a non-acute setting, (3) are compared with a control group without DD or HFpEF or with patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, (4) are in a cross-sectional design. Two investigators independently assessed risk of bias of the included studies according to the QUADAS-2 checklist. Results were meta-analysed when three or more studies reported a similar diagnostic measure. Results From 11,728 titles/abstracts, we included 51 studies. The meta-analysis indicated a reasonable diagnostic performance for both NPs for the detection of DD and HFpEF based on AUC values of approximately 0.80 (0.73–0.87; I2 = 86%). For both NPs, sensitivity was lower than specificity for the detection of DD and HFpEF: approximately 65% (51–85%; I2 = 95%) versus 80% (70–90%; I2 = 97%), respectively. Both NPs have adequate ability to rule out DD: negative predictive value of approximately 85% (78–93%; I2 = 95%). The ability of both NPs to prove DD is lower: positive predictive value of approximately 60% (30–90%; I2 = 99%). Conclusion The diagnostic performance of NPs for the detection of DD and HFpEF is reasonable. However, they may be used to rule out DD or HFpEF, and not for the diagnosis of DD or HFpEF.

scholarly journals Validation of the 2016 ASE/EACVI Guideline for Diastolic Dysfunction in Patients With Unexplained Dyspnea and a Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arno A. van de Bovenkamp ◽  
Vidya Enait ◽  
Frances S. de Man ◽  
Frank T. P. Oosterveer ◽  
Harm Jan Bogaard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Pulmonary Hypertension ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Diastolic Dysfunction ◽  
Diastolic Function ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Background Echocardiography is considered the cornerstone of the diagnostic workup of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Thus far, validation of the 2016 American Society of Echocardiography/European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (ASE/EACVI) echo‐algorithm for evaluation of diastolic (dys)function in a patient suspected of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction has been limited. Methods and Results The diagnostic performance of the 2016 ASE/EACVI algorithm was assessed in 204 patients evaluated for unexplained dyspnea or pulmonary hypertension with echocardiogram and right heart catheterization. Invasively measured pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) was used as the gold standard. In addition, the diagnostic performance of H 2 FPEF score and NT‐proBNP (N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide) were evaluated. There was a poor correlation between indexed left atrial volume, E/e′ (septal and average) or early mitral inflow (E), and PCWP ( r =0.25–0.30, P values all <0.01). No correlation was found in our cohort between e′ (septal or lateral) or tricuspid valve regurgitation and PCWP. The correlation between diastolic function grades of the ASE/EACVI algorithm and PCWP was poor ( r =0.17, P <0.05). The ASE/EACVI algorithm had a sensitivity and specificity of 35% and 87%, respectively; an accuracy of 67% and an area under the curve of 0.56. Moreover, in 30% of cases the algorithm was not applicable or indeterminate. H 2 FPEF score had a modest correlation with PCWP ( r =0.44, P <0.0001), and accuracy was 73%; NT‐proBNP correlated weakly with PCWP ( r =0.24, P <0.001), and accuracy was 57%. Conclusions The 2016 ASE/EACVI algorithm for the assessment of diastolic function has a limited diagnostic accuracy in patients evaluated for unexplained dyspnea and/or pulmonary hypertension, and especially sensitivity to detect diastolic dysfunction was low.

scholarly journals Prognostic role of anemia in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monil Majmundar ◽  
Rajkumar Doshi ◽  
Harshvardhan Zala ◽  
Palak Shah ◽  
Devina Adalja ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Prognostic Role

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
O.M Aldaas ◽  
F Lupercio ◽  
C.L Malladi ◽  
P.S Mylavarapu ◽  
D Darden ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
One Year

Abstract Background Catheter ablation improves clinical outcomes in symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, the role of catheter ablation in HF patients with a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is less clear. Purpose To determine the efficacy of catheter ablation of AF in patients with HFpEF relative to those with HFrEF. Methods We performed an extensive literature search and systematic review of studies that compared AF recurrence at one year after catheter ablation of AF in patients with HFpEF versus those with HFrEF. Risk ratio (RR) 95% confidence intervals were measured using the Mantel-Haenszel method for dichotomous variables, where a RR&lt;1.0 favors the HFpEF group. Results Four studies with a total of 563 patients were included, of which 312 had HFpEF and 251 had HFrEF. All patients included were undergoing first time catheter ablation of AF. Patients with HFpEF experienced similar recurrence of AF one year after ablation on or off antiarrhythmic drugs compared to those with HFrEF (RR 0.87; 95% CI 0.69–1.10, p=0.24), as shown in Figure 1. Recurrence of AF was assessed with electrocardiography, Holter monitoring, and/or event monitoring at scheduled follow-up visits and final follow-up. Conclusion Based on the results of this meta-analysis, catheter ablation of AF in patients with HFpEF appears as efficacious in maintaining sinus rhythm as in those with HFrEF. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Abstract 16170: Impact of Anemia on Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Meta-analysis

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Monil Majmundar ◽  
Ashish Kumar ◽  
Rajkumar P Doshi ◽  
Palak shah ◽  
Mariam Shariff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Publication Bias ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Study Data ◽  
Curve Analysis ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Introduction: The effect of anemia on outcomes in Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) patients is not well-established. Some previous studies have shown increased mortality and hospitalizations in HFpEF patients with anemia. Hypothesis: We hypothesize that anemia affects all-cause mortality and hospitalization in HFpEF patients. Methods: A review of literature for studies comparing outcomes in HFpEF with and without anemia was done in PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases through June 1st, 2020. The standard definitions of HFpEF and anemia were used for inclusion criteria. Two investigators extracted the study data independently. The primary outcome of interest was all-cause mortality. The secondary outcome was all-cause hospitalizations. We used the PM estimator of Tau with Knapp-Hartung adjustment to pool adjusted hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). P curve analysis was used to assess publication bias. R version 3.6.2 was used for all statistical analyses. Results: Seven studies (23,424 patients) were included in the final analysis. Anemia in patients with HFpEF was associated with higher rates of all-cause mortality [HR: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.17-1.55]. Additionally, anemia in HFpEF patients was associated with higher rates of all-cause hospitalization [HR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.03-1.44]. P curve analysis for all-cause mortality didn’t report publication bias or P hacking (Figure) . Conclusions: Anemia in HFpEF patients was associated with higher rates of all-cause mortality and all-cause hospitalizations compared to HFpEF patients without anemia.

scholarly journals Renin-angiotensin blockade in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 402-408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Shahzeb Khan ◽  
Gregg C. Fonarow ◽  
Hassan Khan ◽  
Stephen J. Greene ◽  
Stefan D. Anker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Renin Angiotensin ◽  
Angiotensin Blockade

scholarly journals Opportunistic screening models for high-risk men and women to detect diastolic dysfunction and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in the community

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 613-623 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aisha Gohar ◽  
Rogier F Kievit ◽  
Gideon B Valstar ◽  
Arno W Hoes ◽  
Evelien E Van Riet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Diastolic Dysfunction ◽  
Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Men And Women ◽  
Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction

Background The prevalence of undetected left ventricular diastolic dysfunction is high, especially in the elderly with comorbidities. Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction is a prognostic indicator of heart failure, in particularly of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and of future cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. Therefore we aimed to develop sex-specific diagnostic models to enable the early identification of men and women at high-risk of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction with or without symptoms of heart failure who require more aggressive preventative strategies. Design Individual patient data from four primary care heart failure-screening studies were analysed (1371 participants, excluding patients classified as heart failure and left ventricular ejection fraction <50%). Methods Eleven candidate predictors were entered into logistic regression models to be associated with the presence of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction/heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in men and women separately. Internal-external cross-validation was performed to develop and validate the models. Results Increased age and β-blocker therapy remained as predictors in both the models for men and women. The model for men additionally consisted of increased body mass index, moderate to severe shortness of breath, increased pulse pressure and history of ischaemic heart disease. The models performed moderately and similarly well in men (c-statistics range 0.60–0.75) and women (c-statistics range 0.51–0.76) and the performance improved significantly following the addition of N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide (c-statistics range 0.61–0.80 in women and 0.68–0.80 in men). Conclusions We provide an easy-to-use screening tool for use in the community, which can improve the early detection of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction/heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in high-risk men and women and optimise tailoring of preventive interventions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document