scholarly journals Reduced risk of clinically important deteriorations by ICS in COPD is eosinophil dependent: a pooled post-hoc analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mona Bafadhel ◽  
Dave Singh ◽  
Christine Jenkins ◽  
Stefan Peterson ◽  
Thomas Bengtsson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Effect ◽  
Inhaled Corticosteroids ◽  
Forced Expiratory Volume ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Blood Eosinophil ◽  
Protective Effects ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Post Hoc ◽  
Reduced Risk

Abstract Background Clinically Important Deterioration (CID) is a novel composite measure to assess treatment effect in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We examined the performance and utility of CID in assessing the effect of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in COPD. Methods This post-hoc analysis of four budesonide/formoterol (BUD/FORM) studies comprised 3576 symptomatic moderate-to-very-severe COPD patients with a history of exacerbation. Analysis of time to first CID event (exacerbation, deterioration in forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1] or worsening St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire [SGRQ] score) was completed using Cox proportional hazards models. Results The proportion of patients with ≥1 CID in the four studies ranged between 63 and 77% and 69–84% with BUD/FORM and FORM, respectively, with an average 25% reduced risk of CID with BUD/FORM. All components contributed to the CID event rate. Experiencing a CID during the first 3 months was associated with poorer outcomes (lung function, quality of life, symptoms and reliever use) and increased risk of later CID events. The effect of BUD/FORM versus FORM in reducing CID risk was positively associated with the blood eosinophil count. Conclusions Our findings suggest that BUD/FORM offers protective effects for CID events compared with FORM alone, with the magnitude of the effect dependent on patients’ eosinophil levels. CID may be an important tool for evaluation of treatment effect in a complex, multifaceted, and progressive disease like COPD, and a valuable tool to allow for shorter and smaller future outcome predictive trials in early drug development.

Absolute Blood Eosinophil Counts to Guide Inhaled Corticosteroids Therapy Among Patients with COPD: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (16) ◽  
pp. 1670-1679 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olorunfemi A. Oshagbemi ◽  
Jephthah O. Odiba ◽  
Abraham Daniel ◽  
Ismaeel Yunusa
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Eosinophil Count ◽  
Inhaled Corticosteroids ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Blood Eosinophil ◽  
Blood Eosinophil Count ◽  
Copd Patients ◽  
Phenotypic Group ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Eosinophil Counts

Introduction: The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) 2019 recommends the use of absolute blood eosinophil count as a guide for the escalation and de-escalation of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in the pharmacological management of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We evaluated the risk of moderate or severe exacerbations among patients escalating and de-escalating ICS therapy by absolute blood eosinophil thresholds in this systematic review. Methods: Through a comprehensive literature search of Pubmed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and clinical trial sites up to April 2019, we identified relevant studies. We used generic inverse variance method with fixed-effects estimates to compare the risk of moderate or severe exacerbations among COPD patients with elevated blood eosinophil counts exposed to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) versus non-ICS treatments groups expressed as risk ratios. Results: Ten studies (8 randomised control trials and 2 observational studies) were included, with a total of 85,059 COPD patients. In our pooled analysis, we found an overall reduction in risk of moderate or severe exacerbations in patients with absolute blood eosinophil thresholds ranging from ≥ 100 to ≥ 340 cells/µL among patients escalating ICS (RR, 0.77, 95% CI, 0.73-0.81). For studies evaluating the effects of de-escalation of ICS on moderate to severe exacerbations using blood eosinophil thresholds of ≥ 300 to ≥ 340 cells/µL had an increased risk of moderate or severe exacerbations following the de-escalation of ICS (RR, 1.66, 95% CI, 1.31-2.10). Conclusion: This study confirms the validity of the recommended absolute blood eosinophil count thresholds for the escalation and de-escalation of ICS among COPD patients. However, this recommendation is for COPD patients with prior exacerbations rather than among newly diagnosed COPD patients as observed in this study. COPD patients with current or past history of asthma represent a unique phenotypic group which should be further evaluated.

scholarly journals Salbutamol use in relation to maintenance bronchodilator efficacy in COPD: a prospective subgroup analysis of the EMAX trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Maltais ◽  
I. P. Naya ◽  
C. F. Vogelmeier ◽  
I. H. Boucot ◽  
P. W. Jones ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inhaled Corticosteroids ◽  
Forced Expiratory Volume ◽  
Airflow Limitation ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Fractional Polynomial ◽  
Exacerbation Risk ◽  
Symptom Outcome ◽  
Post Hoc

Abstract Background Short-acting β2-agonist (SABA) bronchodilators help alleviate symptoms in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and may be a useful marker of symptom severity. This analysis investigated whether SABA use impacts treatment differences between maintenance dual- and mono-bronchodilators in patients with COPD. Methods The Early MAXimisation of bronchodilation for improving COPD stability (EMAX) trial randomised symptomatic patients with low exacerbation risk not receiving inhaled corticosteroids 1:1:1 to once-daily umeclidinium/vilanterol 62.5/25 μg, once-daily umeclidinium 62.5 μg or twice-daily salmeterol 50 μg for 24 weeks. Pre-specified subgroup analyses stratified patients by median baseline SABA use (low, < 1.5 puffs/day; high, ≥1.5 puffs/day) to examine change from baseline in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), change in symptoms (Transition Dyspnoea Index [TDI], Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms-COPD [E-RS]), daily SABA use and exacerbation risk. A post hoc analysis used fractional polynomial modelling with continuous transformations of baseline SABA use covariates. Results At baseline, patients in the high SABA use subgroup (mean: 3.91 puffs/day, n = 1212) had more severe airflow limitation, were more symptomatic and had worse health status versus patients in the low SABA use subgroup (0.39 puffs/day, n = 1206). Patients treated with umeclidinium/vilanterol versus umeclidinium demonstrated statistically significant improvements in trough FEV1 at Week 24 in both SABA subgroups (59–74 mL; p < 0.001); however, only low SABA users demonstrated significant improvements in TDI (high: 0.27 [p = 0.241]; low: 0.49 [p = 0.025]) and E-RS (high: 0.48 [p = 0.138]; low: 0.60 [p = 0.034]) scores. By contrast, significant reductions in mean SABA puffs/day with umeclidinium/vilanterol versus umeclidinium were observed only in high SABA users (high: − 0.56 [p < 0.001]; low: − 0.10 [p = 0.132]). Similar findings were observed when comparing umeclidinium/vilanterol and salmeterol. Fractional polynomial modelling showed baseline SABA use ≥4 puffs/day resulted in smaller incremental symptom improvements with umeclidinium/vilanterol versus umeclidinium compared with baseline SABA use < 4 puffs/day. Conclusions In high SABA users, there may be a smaller difference in treatment response between dual- and mono-bronchodilator therapy; the reasons for this require further investigation. SABA use may be a confounding factor in bronchodilator trials and in high SABA users; changes in SABA use may be considered a robust symptom outcome. Funding GlaxoSmithKline (study number 201749 [NCT03034915]).

scholarly journals Asthma, airflow limitation and mortality risk in the general population

2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 338-346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuang Huang ◽  
Monica M. Vasquez ◽  
Marilyn Halonen ◽  
Fernando D. Martinez ◽  
Stefano Guerra
Keyword(s):  
Lung Function ◽  
Mortality Risk ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Forced Expiratory Volume ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Airflow Limitation ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Asthma Group

Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease co-exist in a significant proportion of patients. Whether asthma increases mortality risk among subjects with airflow limitation remains controversial.We used data from 2121 adult participants in the population-based Tucson Epidemiological Study of Airway Obstructive Disease cohort. At enrolment (1972–1973), participants completed questionnaires and lung function tests. Participants were categorised into four groups based on the combination of airflow limitation (AL; forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC) <70%) and physician-confirmed asthma at baseline. Vital status as of January 2011 was assessed through the National Death Index. Cox proportional hazards models were used to test differences in mortality risk across the four airflow limitation/asthma groups.In multivariate Cox models, the AL+/asthma+ group had a 114% increased mortality risk during follow-up compared with the AL-/asthma- group (adjusted HR 2.14; 95% CI 1.64–2.79). The corresponding hazard ratios were 1.09 (95% CI 0.89–1.34) and 1.34 (95% CI 1.14–1.57) for the AL-/asthma+ and AL+/asthma- groups, respectively. Among subjects with airflow limitation, asthma was associated with increased mortality risk (HR 1.58, 95% CI 1.17–2.12). However, this increased risk was substantially reduced and no longer significant after further adjustment for baseline FEV1 levels. Similar results were obtained when airflow limitation was defined as FEV1/FVC less than the lower limit of normal.In a population-based cohort, subjects with concomitant airflow limitation and asthma had an increased risk of dying, which was mainly related to their baseline lung function deficits.

scholarly journals Blood eosinophils as a marker of response to inhaled corticosteroids in COPD

2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
pp. 1374-1382 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neil C. Barnes ◽  
Raj Sharma ◽  
Sally Lettis ◽  
Peter M.A. Calverley
Keyword(s):  
Fluticasone Propionate ◽  
Eosinophil Count ◽  
Inhaled Corticosteroids ◽  
Forced Expiratory Volume ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Blood Eosinophil ◽  
Severe Exacerbation ◽  
Exacerbation Rate ◽  
Blood Eosinophil Count ◽  
Rate Of Decline

Identification of a biomarker that predicts response to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) would help evaluate the risk/benefit profile of ICS in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and guide treatment.The ISOLDE study randomised 751 patients (mean post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) 1.4 L: 50% predicted normal) to fluticasone propionate 500 μg twice daily or placebo for 3 years, finding no difference in FEV1 rate of decline between treatments (p=0.16) and a significant reduction in median exacerbation rate with fluticasone propionate versus placebo (p=0.026). We re-analysed ISOLDE results by baseline blood eosinophil count to investigate whether eosinophil level predicts ICS benefit.Patients with eosinophils <2% (n=456) had a similar rate of post-bronchodilator FEV1 decline with fluticasone propionate as placebo (–2.9 mL·year−1; p=0.688). With eosinophils ≥2% (n=214), the rate of decline decreased by 33.9 mL·year−1 with fluticasone propionate versus placebo (p=0.003). Exacerbation rate reduction on ICS for fluticasone propionate versus placebo was higher in the eosinophil <2% group compared with the ≥2% group; time-to-first moderate/severe exacerbation was not different between treatments in either group.A baseline blood eosinophil count of ≥2% identifies a group of COPD patients with slower rates of decline in FEV1 when treated with ICS: prospective testing of this hypothesis is now warranted.

scholarly journals Benefit of switching to mepolizumab from omalizumab in severe eosinophilic asthma based on patient characteristics

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark C. Liu ◽  
Bradley Chipps ◽  
Xavier Munoz ◽  
Gilles Devouassoux ◽  
Miguel Bergna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inhaled Corticosteroids ◽  
Forced Expiratory Volume ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Blood Eosinophil ◽  
Eosinophilic Asthma ◽  
Asthma Control Questionnaire ◽  
Post Hoc Analysis ◽  
Severe Eosinophilic Asthma ◽  
Baseline Characteristics ◽  
Post Hoc

Abstract Background The OSMO study assessed the efficacy of switching to mepolizumab in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma that was uncontrolled whilst receiving omalizumab. The objective of this analysis was to assess the proportion of patients achieving pre-defined improvements in up to four efficacy outcomes and the relationship between patient baseline characteristics and treatment response. Methods This was a post hoc analysis of OSMO study data (GSK ID:204471; ClinicalTrials.gov No. NCT02654145). Patients with severe eosinophilic asthma uncontrolled by high-dose inhaled corticosteroids, other controller(s) and omalizumab subcutaneously (≥ 4 months) were switched to mepolizumab 100 mg administered subcutaneously. Endpoints included the proportion of responders—i.e. patients achieving a pre-defined clinical improvement in ≥ 1 of the following outcomes: (1) Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)-5 score (≥ 0.5-points), (2) St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score (≥ 4-points), (3) pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1; ≥ 100 mL), all at Week 32, and (4) annualised rate of clinically significant exacerbations (≥ 50% reduction). Results Of the 145 patients included, 94%, 83%, 63% and 31% were responders for ≥ 1, ≥ 2, ≥ 3 and 4 outcomes, respectively; 75% and 78% were ACQ-5 and SGRQ score responders, and 50% and 69% were FEV1 and exacerbation responders. Subgroup analyses demonstrated improvements irrespective of baseline blood eosinophil count, prior omalizumab treatment regimen/duration, comorbidities, prior exacerbation history, maintenance oral corticosteroid use, ACQ-5 and SGRQ scores, and body weight/body mass index. Conclusions After switching to mepolizumab, almost all patients with uncontrolled severe eosinophilic asthma on omalizumab achieved a beneficial response in ≥ 1 clinical outcome. Improvements were observed regardless of baseline characteristics. Trial registration This manuscript is a post hoc analysis of data from the OSMO study. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02654145. Registered January 13, 2016.

scholarly journals Low-dose Fluticasone Propionate in Combination With Salmeterol in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 117954841877170
Author(s):  
Hideki Yasui ◽  
Naoki Inui ◽  
Tomoyuki Fujisawa ◽  
Masato Karayama ◽  
Noriyuki Enomoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Fluticasone Propionate ◽  
Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Inhaled Corticosteroids ◽  
Forced Expiratory Volume ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Beneficial Effects ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Using Data

Inhaled corticosteroids are widely used in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, their use has been questioned for appropriate dose and a possible increased risk of pneumonia. Here, we reviewed patients with COPD who had received fluticasone–salmeterol combination treatment using data from a linked electronic medical record database. A total of 180 patients received salmeterol with 250 µg fluticasone propionate twice daily and 78 received salmeterol and 100 µg fluticasone propionate twice daily. In both groups, there was no difference in the improved forced expiratory volume in 1 second and COPD assessment test score and the proportion of patients with exacerbations. Although the incidence of common toxicity was approximately equal, that of pneumonia was much higher in the 250 µg group (8.9% vs 1.3%, P=.01). The beneficial effects of inhaled corticosteroids might be obtained at lower doses.

scholarly journals Withdrawal of inhaled corticosteroids versus continuation of triple therapy in patients with COPD in real life: observational comparative effectiveness study

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Helgo Magnussen ◽  
◽  
Sarah Lucas ◽  
Therese Lapperre ◽  
Jennifer K. Quint ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Triple Therapy ◽  
Comparative Effectiveness ◽  
Inhaled Corticosteroids ◽  
Blood Eosinophil ◽  
Research Database ◽  
Effectiveness Study ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Comparative Effectiveness Study ◽  
Oral Corticosteroids

Abstract Background Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are indicated for prevention of exacerbations in patients with COPD, but they are frequently overprescribed. ICS withdrawal has been recommended by international guidelines in order to prevent side effects in patients in whom ICS are not indicated. Method Observational comparative effectiveness study aimed to evaluate the effect of ICS withdrawal versus continuation of triple therapy (TT) in COPD patients in primary care. Data were obtained from the Optimum Patient Care Research Database (OPCRD) in the UK. Results A total of 1046 patients who withdrew ICS were matched 1:4 by time on TT to 4184 patients who continued with TT. Up to 76.1% of the total population had 0 or 1 exacerbation the previous year. After controlling for confounders, patients who discontinued ICS did not have an increased risk of moderate or severe exacerbations (adjusted HR: 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94–1.15; p = 0.441). However, rates of exacerbations managed in primary care (incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.33, 95% CI 1.10–1.60; p = 0.003) or in hospital (IRR 1.72, 95% CI 1.03–2.86; p = 0.036) were higher in the cessation group. Unsuccessful ICS withdrawal was significantly and independently associated with more frequent courses of oral corticosteroids the previous year and with a blood eosinophil count ≥ 300 cells/μL. Conclusions In this primary care population of patients with COPD, composed mostly of infrequent exacerbators, discontinuation of ICS from TT was not associated with an increased risk of exacerbation; however, the subgroup of patients with more frequent courses of oral corticosteroids and high blood eosinophil counts should not be withdrawn from ICS. Trial registration European Network of Centres for Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacovigilance (EUPAS30851).

MO547ASSOCIATION BETWEEN SERUM INDICES OF IRON METABOLISM AND CARDIOVASCULAR MORBIDITY IN PATIENTS WITH PREDIALYSIS CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Takeshi Hasegawa ◽  
Takahiro Imaizumi ◽  
Kenta Murotani ◽  
Takayuki Hamano ◽  
Masafumi Fukagawa
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Iron Metabolism ◽  
Iron Supplementation ◽  
Transferrin Saturation ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Function Evaluation ◽  
Iron Deficient ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Reduced Risk

Abstract Background and Aims Patients with predialysis chronic kidney disease (CKD) have a greater risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD) events than the general population. Anaemia is the most frequent comorbidity in pre-dialysis CKD patients and is associated with an increase in CVD events. Iron deficiency is the most frequent cause of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) resistant anaemia in CKD patients and is modifiable by therapeutic intervention. However, the optimal ranges of iron markers are uncertain in predialysis CKD patients. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the association between serum indices of iron metabolism and the incidence of CVD events in patients with predialysis CKD using the CKD-Japan Cohort (CKD-JAC) data. Method We prospectively followed 1550 CKD patients aged 20-75 years with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) &lt;60 mL/min/1.73 m2 for a mean of 4.21 years. We set serum transferrin saturation (TSAT) and ferritin levels as the main exposures to be tested. Our main outcome measures were any of the CVD events including fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure (CHF), angina pectoris, arrhythmia, aorta dissection, cerebrovascular disorder, and peripheral artery diseases identified at each facility and adjudicated by the independent cardiac function evaluation committee. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were employed to examine the association between serum TSAT or ferritin levels with time to events. Death was considered as a competing risk with the Fine and Gray model. All models were stratified by facilities and adjusted for potential confounders as follows: age, sex, systolic blood pressure, diabetes mellitus, history of CHF, haemoglobin, serum calcium, serum phosphorus, intact parathyroid hormone, eGFR, proteinuria, ESAs, iron supplementation, renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, and beta-blockers. We also applied the multivariable fractional polynomial interaction (MFPI) approach to investigate whether TSAT levels are the effect modifier of the association between iron supplementation and the outcomes. Results In the overall cohort, 208 (13.4 %) patients developed CVD events (including 97 CHF) during the follow-up period (26.6 events/1000 person-year). The incidence rate of CVD events was the highest in the TSAT &lt; 20% category (33.0 events/1000 person-year). Compared to patients in the TSAT &gt; 40% category, those in the TSAT &lt; 20% category demonstrated an increased risk of CVD events (adjusted hazard ratio (AHR): 1.86, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.06-3.26) and CHF events (AHR: 2.82, 95% CI: 1.15-6.89), respectively. Meanwhile, there was no association between serum ferritin levels and the risk of developing CVD or CHF events. MFPI analyses showed a reduced risk of CVD in patients receiving iron supplementation only in patients with TSAT &lt;20% (P for interaction=0.02). Conclusion Maintaining TSAT &gt;20% could be effective to reduce the risk of developing CVD events (especially CHF) in patients with predialysis CKD. Our analyses also suggest that iron-deficient patients with predialysis CKD may benefit from iron supplementation for reduced risk of CVD events.

scholarly journals Blood eosinophils on hospital admission for COPD exacerbation do not predict the recurrence of moderate and severe relapses

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 00543-2020
Author(s):  
Balázs Csoma ◽  
András Bikov ◽  
Ferenc Tóth ◽  
György Losonczy ◽  
Veronika Müller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Forced Expiratory Volume ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Full Blood Count ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Severe Exacerbation ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Exacerbation Of Copd

Background and objectiveThe relationship between hospitalisation with an eosinophilic acute exacerbation of COPD (AE-COPD) and future relapses is unclear. We aimed to explore this association by following 152 patients for 12 months after hospital discharge or until their first moderate or severe flare-up.MethodsPatients hospitalised with AE-COPD were divided into eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic groups based on full blood count results on admission. All patients were treated with a course of systemic corticosteroid. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to study the association with the time to first re-exacerbation; a generalised linear regression model was applied to identify clinical variables related to the recurrence of relapses.ResultsWe did not find a difference in the time to the next moderate or severe exacerbation between the eosinophilic (≥2% of total leukocytes and/or ≥200 eosinophils·µL−1, n=51, median (interquartile range): 21 (10–36) weeks) and non-eosinophilic groups (n=101, 17 (9–36) weeks, log-rank test: p=0.63). No association was found when other cut-off values (≥3% of total leukocytes and/or ≥300 eosinophils·µL−1) were used for the eosinophilic phenotype. However, the higher number of past severe exacerbations, a lower forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) at discharge and higher pack-years were related to shorter exacerbation-free time. According to a subgroup analysis (n=73), 48.1% of patients with initial eosinophilic exacerbations had non-eosinophilic relapses on readmission.ConclusionsOur data do not support an increased risk of earlier recurring moderate or severe relapses in patients hospitalised with eosinophilic exacerbations of COPD. Eosinophilic severe exacerbations present a variable phenotype.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document