scholarly journals The expression profiles and prognostic values of HSPs family members in Head and neck cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Guorun Fan ◽  
Yaqin Tu ◽  
Nan Wu ◽  
Hongjun Xiao
Head & Neck ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 544-554 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leah A. Lechelt ◽  
Jana M. Rieger ◽  
Katherine Cowan ◽  
Brock J. Debenham ◽  
Bernie Krewski ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 213 (3) ◽  
pp. 283-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
NF Schlecht ◽  
RD Burk ◽  
L Adrien ◽  
A Dunne ◽  
N Kawachi ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 358 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nham Tran ◽  
Tessa McLean ◽  
Xiaoying Zhang ◽  
Chuan Jia Zhao ◽  
John Michael Thomson ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shahan Mamoor

Differential gene expression analysis has the potential to illuminate fundamentals of biology by identifying key differences in transcription between cells, genotypes or diseases. I compared the expression profiles of 327 genes in a cohort of patients with head and neck cancer (1), grouped based on their survival at three years. Patients who were dead at three years possessed a unique “death signature” of forty genes whose expression was significantly different from that of survivors. This gene expression signature, associated with more rapid mortality in humans with head and neck cancer, may have clinical relevance in prognostic stratification and the genes themselves may have biological significance in the etiology of head and neck cancer.


Head & Neck ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 29 (12) ◽  
pp. 1083-1089 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jimmy Pramana ◽  
Nuno Pimentel ◽  
Ingrid Hofland ◽  
Lodewijk F. A. Wessels ◽  
Marie-Louise F. van Velthuysen ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bahman Afsari ◽  
Theresa Guo ◽  
Michael Considine ◽  
Liliana Florea ◽  
Luciane T. Kagohara ◽  
...  

AbstractMotivationCurrent bioinformatics methods to detect changes in gene isoform usage in distinct phenotypes compare the relative expected isoform usage in phenotypes. These statistics model differences in isoform usage in normal tissues, which have stable regulation of gene splicing. Pathological conditions, such as cancer, can have broken regulation of splicing that increases the heterogeneity of the expression of splice variants. Inferring events with such differential heterogeneity in gene isoform usage requires new statistical approaches.ResultsWe introduce Splice Expression Variability Analysis (SEVA) to model increased heterogeneity of splice variant usage between conditions (e.g., tumor and normal samples). SEVA uses a rank-based multivariate statistic that compares the variability of junction expression profiles within one condition to the variability within another. Simulated data show that SEVA is unique in modeling heterogeneity of gene isoform usage, and benchmark SEVA’s performance against EBSeq, DiffSplice, and rMATS that model differential isoform usage instead of heterogeneity. We confirm the accuracy of SEVAin identifying known splice variants in head and neck cancer and perform cross-study validation of novel splice variants. A novel comparison of splice variant heterogeneity between subtypes of head and neck cancer demonstrated unanticipated similarity between the heterogeneity of gene isoform usage in HPV-positive and HPV-negative subtypes and anticipated increased heterogeneity among HPV-negative samples with mutations in genes that regulate the splice variant machinery.ConclusionThese results show that SEVA accurately models differential heterogeneity of gene isoform usage from RNA-seq data.AvailabilitySEVA is implemented in the R/Bioconductor package [email protected],[email protected],[email protected]


2010 ◽  
Vol 95 (3) ◽  
pp. 365-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monique C. de Jong ◽  
Jimmy Pramana ◽  
Joost L. Knegjens ◽  
Alfons J.M. Balm ◽  
Michiel W.M. van den Brekel ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (22) ◽  
pp. 8570
Author(s):  
Sonja Ludwig ◽  
Priyanka Sharma ◽  
Petra Wise ◽  
Richard Sposto ◽  
Deborah Hollingshead ◽  
...  

Human papillomavirus (HPV)(+) and HPV(−) head and neck cancer (HNC) cells’ interactions with the host immune system are poorly understood. Recently, we identified molecular and functional differences in exosomes produced by HPV(+) vs. HPV(−) cells, suggesting that genetic cargos of exosomes might identify novel biomarkers in HPV-related HNCs. Exosomes were isolated by size exclusion chromatography from supernatants of three HPV(+) and two HPV(−) HNC cell lines. Paired cell lysates and exosomes were analyzed for messenger RNA (mRNA) by qRT-PCR and microRNA (miR) contents by nanostring analysis. The mRNA profiles of HPV(+) vs. HPV(−) cells were distinct, with EGFR, TP53 and HSPA1A/B overexpressed in HPV(+) cells and IL6, FAS and DPP4 in HPV(−) cells. The mRNA profiles of HPV(+) or HPV(−) exosomes resembled the cargo of their parent cells. miR expression profiles in cell lysates identified 8 miRs expressed in HPV(−) cells vs. 14 miRs in HPV(+) cells. miR-205-5p was exclusively expressed in HPV(+) exosomes, and miR-1972 was only detected in HPV(−) exosomes. We showed that HPV(+) and HPV(−) exosomes recapitulated the mRNA expression profiles of their parent cells. Expression of miRs was dependent on the HPV status, and miR-205-5p in HPV(+) and miR-1972 in HPV(−) exosomes emerge as potential discriminating HPV-associated biomarkers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document