scholarly journals Colistin versus meropenem in the empirical treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia (Magic Bullet study): an investigator-driven, open-label, randomized, noninferiority controlled trial

Critical Care ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
José M. Cisneros ◽  
◽  
Clara María Rosso-Fernández ◽  
Cristina Roca-Oporto ◽  
Gennaro De Pascale ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Empirical Treatment ◽  
Early Termination ◽  
Magic Bullet ◽  
Ventilator Associated Pneumonia ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background Colistin is recommended in the empirical treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) with a high prevalence of carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacilli (CR-GNB). However, the efficacy and safety of colistin are not well defined. Methods A multicenter prospective randomized trial conducted in 32 European centers compared the efficacy and safety of colistin (4.5 million unit loading dose followed by a maintenance dose of 3 million units every 8 h) versus meropenem (2 g every 8 h), both in combination with levofloxacin (500 mg every 12 h) for 7–14 days in patients with late VAP. Between May 2012 and October 2015, 232 patients were randomly assigned to the 2 treatment groups. The primary endpoint was mortality at 28 days after randomization in the microbiologically modified intention-to-treat (mMITT) population. Secondary outcomes included clinical and microbiological cure, renal function at the end of the treatment, and serious adverse events. The study was interrupted after the interim analysis due to excessive nephrotoxicity in the colistin group; therefore, the sample size was not achieved. Results A total of 157 (67.7%) patients were included in the mMITT population, 36 of whom (22.9%) had VAP caused by CR-GNB. In the mMITT population, no significant difference in mortality between the colistin group (19/82, 23.2%) and the meropenem group (19/75, 25.3%) was observed, with a risk difference of − 2.16 (− 15.59 to 11.26, p = 0.377); the noninferiority of colistin was not demonstrated due to early termination and limited number of patients infected by carbapenem-resistant pathogens. Colistin plus levofloxacin increased the incidence of renal failure (40/120, 33.3%, versus 21/112, 18.8%; p = 0.012) and renal replacement therapy (11/120, 9.1%, versus 2/112, 1.8%; p = 0.015). Conclusions This study did not demonstrate the noninferiority of colistin compared with meropenem, both combined with levofloxacin, in terms of efficacy in the empirical treatment of late VAP but demonstrated the greater nephrotoxicity of colistin. These findings do not support the empirical use of colistin for the treatment of late VAP due to early termination. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01292031. Registered 9 February 2011.

scholarly journals POS0630 COMPARISON OF THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF ORIGINAL AND BIOSIMILAR ADALIMUMAB MOLECULES IN CHILDHOOD RHEUMATIC DISEASES

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 553.1-553
Author(s):  
K. Ulu ◽  
F. Demir ◽  
T. Coşkuner ◽  
Ş. Çağlayan ◽  
B. Sözeri
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Rheumatic Diseases ◽  
Behcet’S Disease ◽  
Behçet's Disease ◽  
Inactive Disease ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Abp 501

Background:The TNF-α inhibitor adalimumab is a biological disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD) that has been used in different rheumatic diseases with a resistant course. ABP-501 is a biosimilar product (BP) of adalimumab, recently approved by the FDA and EMA. To our knowledge, there is no study assess the efficacy and safety of these two molecules on pediatric patients.Objectives:We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of the original and biosimilar adalimumab (ABP-501) molecules in childhood rheumatic diseases.Methods:This non-interventional, retrospective, single-centre analysis carried out in Umraniye Training and Resrach Hospital, Pediatric Rheumatology Clinic, Istanbul, Turkey. The study group consisted of patients who were followed due to chronic rheumatic disease between January 1, 2016 and June 1, 2020, and received reference or biosimilar adalimumab therapy for at least three months. Demographic and clinical data of patients were collected at baseline, 3rd, 6th, and 12th months of treatment. Disease activity assessment was made with JADAS-27 in JIA patients, with SUN criteria in uveitis patients, and with Behçet’s Disease Activity Index in BD patients. Efficacy and safety of treatments were compared between reference and biosimilar adalimumab groups.Results:A total of 89 patients (65 with original and 24 with biosimilar molecule) treated with adalimumab, were included in the study. There were 45 female and 44 male in the study, and the median age at the initiation of the adalimumab was 166 months (min-max: 36-231). Of the 89 patients evaluated, the primary diagnoses of 62 were juvenile idiopathic arthritis, 13 were idiopathic uveitis, eight were Behçet’s disease, three were Blau syndrome, two were chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis and one was Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada syndrome. 63 of the patients were biologic-naïve, and 13 were switched from etanercept, 11 from infliximab, and two from other bDMARDs. The median exposure time of adalimumab was 16 months (min-max:3-70) in RP and 14.5 months (min-max: 3-23) in BP. All patients had active disease before treatment. In the group treated with RP, inactive disease was achieved in 60%, 76.6% and 87.2% of the patients at the 3rd, 6th and 12th months, respectively. Also, inactive disease was achieved in 62.5%, 78.2% and 78.2% of the patients at the 3rd, 6th and 12th months in the group treated with BP, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in efficacy between the groups at the 3rd, 6th and 12th months (p=0.83, 0.07 and 0.32). Serious adverse events were seen in one patient in each groups (lymphoma in RP group, tuberculous meningitis in BP group). Non-serious adverse events were observed in eight patients (12.3%) in the RP group and in two patients (8.3%) in the BP group, without statistically significant difference between groups (p=0.86).Conclusion:No significant difference was observed between the biosimilar adalimumab ABP-501 and RP adalimumab in terms of efficacy and safety.References:[1]Renton, William D et al. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2019;17(1):67.[2]Lovell DJ, Ruperto N, Goodman S, et al. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(8):810-820.[3]Kingsbury, Daniel J et al. Clin Rheumatol 2014;33(10):1433-41.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

scholarly journals The Use of Milrinone Versus Conventional Treatment for the Management of Life-Threatening Bronchial Asthma

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amr Sobhy ◽  
Doaa M. K. Eldin ◽  
Hany V. Zaki
Keyword(s):  
Bronchial Asthma ◽  
Conventional Treatment ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Blood Gases ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Arterial Blood ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Life Threatening

Background and Aims: In our study, we investigated the effectiveness of intravenous milrinone in life-threatening bronchial asthma as compared to conventional treatment. Methods: Fifty patients aged 18-50 years, presenting with life-threatening asthma were enrolled in a Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT). They were randomly allocated into Group C (25 patients): who received the standard pharmacotherapy and placebo, and Group M (25 patients): who in addition to the standard therapy, received 25 μg milrinone as an initial slow IV bolus diluted in 10 ml of normal saline. The following data were recorded: PEFR (Peak Expiratory Flow Rate) expressed as a percentage of the patient’s previous value, Respiratory Rate (RR), MABP (Mean Arterial Blood Pressure), arterial blood gases, and the number of patients requiring mechanical ventilation. Differences between groups were tested using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) for quantitative variables with post hoc using the Least Significant Difference (LSD) test, and Chi square test for categorical variables. Results: Group M showed marked improvement in PEFR that was highly significant (P < 0.001) 10 min after injection and significant after one hour from the start of treatment in comparison to Group C. There was also an improvement in RR and PO2 that was significant in group M. Milrinone was associated with a reduction in MABP only after 10 min from injection, and showed a statistically significant decrease in the number of patients requiring mechanical ventilator support (P ˂ 0.05). Conclusion: Milronine is a promising agent as a rescue drug in the treatment of life-threatening bronchial asthma.

P-681 Will the hCG trigger dose used for final oocyte maturation in IVF impact endogenous progesterone during the luteal phase? - A randomized controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Svenstrup ◽  
J Fedder ◽  
S Möller ◽  
D Pedersen ◽  
K Erb ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oocyte Maturation ◽  
Luteal Phase ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Final Oocyte Maturation ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Hcg Trigger ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Study question Is there an association between the hCG dose used for ovulation trigger and the endogenous progesterone production during the luteal phase? Summary answer Increased hCG dosing significantly increased the endogenous progesterone level during the luteal phase. What is known already During the luteal phase of an IVF treatment, the endogenous progesterone (P4) production is negatively impacted due to reduced circulating endogenous LH, caused by negative feed-back of elevated steroids; thus, luteal phase support (LPS) with exogenous P4 remains mandatory in IVF. Apart from inducing final oocyte maturation, the gold standard HCG trigger also functions as an early LPS, boosting P4 production by the corpora lutea (CL). P4 plays a pivotal role for embryo implantation and pregnancy, and an optimal P4 level around peri-implantation seems to be essential for the reproductive outcomes of fresh and frozen/thaw embryo transfer cycles. Study design, size, duration A randomized controlled 4-arm study, including a total of 127 IVF patients, enrolled from January 2015 until September 2019 at the Fertility Clinic, Odense University Hospital, Denmark. Participants/materials, setting, methods IVF patients with ≤ 11 follicles ≥ 12 mm were randomized to four groups. Groups 1-3 were triggered with: 5.000 IU, 6.500 IU or 10.000 IU, hCG, respectively, receiving a LPS consisting of 17-α-hydroxy-progesterone (17α OH P4) to distinguish the endogenous P4 from the exogenous supplementation. Group 4 (control) was randomized to a 6.500 IU hCG trigger and standard LPS. A total of eight blood samples were drawn during the early luteal phase. Main results and the role of chance A total of 94 patients completed the study: 21, 22, 25 and 26 patients in each group, respectively. Baseline characteristics were similar, except for the endogenous LH level and cycle lengths. There were no significant differences between groups regarding ovarian stimulation, number of oocytes and embryos. The median number of follicles ≥ 12mm on the day of trigger was 8.5, resulting in 6.6 oocytes being retrieved. Significant differences in P4 levels were seen at OPU+8 (p &lt; 0.001), OPU+10 (p &lt; 0.001) and OPU+14 (p &lt; 0.001), with positive correlations between P4 level and hCG dose. Groups compared individually showed significant difference in P4 between low and high trigger dose at OPU+4 group 1 and 3 (p = 0.037) and OPU+8 group 1 and 3 (p = 0.007) and between all the three groups around implantation at OPU+6 group 1 and 2 (p = 0.011), group 2 and 3 (p = 0.042) and group 1 and 3 (p &lt; 0.001). Higher P4 levels around implantation were related to follicle count and to pregnancy. After logistic regression analyses there were still significant individual differences between the groups. Limitations, reasons for caution Although patients were randomized and strict inclusion and exclusion criteria were used, the RCT was un-blinded, including a relatively small number of patients. Moreover, for dosing purposes urinary hCG as well as recombinant hCG was used and pharmacokinetics differ. Finally, the P4 level could be influenced by circadian fluctuations. Wider implications of the findings This is the first study to explore dose-responses in circulating P4 after hCG trigger in IVF patients. Increasing the hCG trigger dose increased the endogenous P4 around peri-implantation. Personalizing the hCG trigger dose could be a key point to secure the most optimal P4 mid-luteal phase P4 level. Trial registration number Eudract 2013-003304-39

scholarly journals 1452. Is Carbapenem-Sparing Therapy as Effective as Carbapenems Against Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase Producing Enterobacteriaceae in UTI?

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S530-S530
Author(s):  
Jonghoon Hyun ◽  
Yongseop Lee ◽  
Hye Seong ◽  
Jung Ho Kim ◽  
Nam su Ku ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Pyelonephritis ◽  
Medical Records ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Extended Spectrum ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Definitive Therapy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Duration Of Hospitalization ◽  
Resistant Strains ◽  
Negative Conversion

Abstract Background With the emergence of carbapenem-resistant strains of Enterobacteriaceae, non-carbapenem antibiotics are suggested as the alternative treatment of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producing Enterobacteriaceae infection. In this study, efficacy of non-carbapenem antibiotics on acute pyelonephritis (APN) with ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae was compared with that of carbapenems. Methods The medical records of patients who had diagnosed to have acute pyelonephritis with ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae on their urine culture, from January 2011 to December 2018, were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were classified as carbapenem and non-carbapenem group according to the definitive antibiotics they had treated with. Results Total number of patients was 141, including 112 (79.4%) who had received carbapenem, and 29 (20.6%) received non-carbapenem as definitive therapy against to APN with ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae. The duration of hospitalization was shorter for non-carbapenem group (median 9.93 days) than for carbapenem group (median 14.39 days) (P < 0.001). The duration of negative conversion of culture was shorter for carbapenem group (median 40.73 hours) than for non-carbapenem group (median 56.79 hours). There was no significant difference in time to febrile period and duration of definitive therapy between two groups. Conclusion Non-carbapenem therapy against APN with ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae has no significant difference in clinical outcome compared with carbapenem therapy. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Efficacy of Phenazone in the Treatment of Acute Migraine Attacks: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Study

Cephalalgia ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (10) ◽  
pp. 888-893 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Göbel ◽  
A Heinze ◽  
U Niederberger ◽  
T Witt ◽  
V Zumbroich
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Acute Migraine ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Main Target

In this study we compared the efficacy of 1000 mg phenazone with that of placebo in the treatment of acute migraine attacks in a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 208 patients. The main target criterion was the number of patients with a pain reduction from severe or moderate to slight or no pain 2 h after taking the pain medication. The percentage of patients satisfying the main target criterion was 48.6% for phenazone and 27.2% ( P < 0.05) for placebo. Freedom from pain after 2 h was reported by 27.6% with phenazone treatment and 13.6% ( P < 0.05) with placebo. Compared with placebo, the phenazone treatment also resulted in a significant improvement in the associated migraine symptoms of nausea, phonophobia and photophobia. Of patients treated with phenazone 11.4%, and 5.8% of those treated with placebo reported adverse events. There was no significant difference between the groups with regard to numbers of patients with adverse events. No serious adverse events occurred. The results show that phenazone at a dosage of 1000 mg is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of acute migraine attacks.

Efficacy of a step-down regimen of oral prednisolone in axial spondyloarthritis: result of a double-blind randomized controlled trial (COBRA-AS Study)

Rheumatology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Debashish Mishra ◽  
Varun Dhir ◽  
G S R S N K Naidu ◽  
Aastha Khullar ◽  
Vishal Kumar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Oral Prednisolone ◽  
Functional Improvement ◽  
Inadequate Response ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Step Down

Abstract Objectives To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a step-down regimen of oral prednisolone over 24 weeks in patients of axial SpA (axSpA). Methods This proof-of-concept double-blind randomized controlled trial enrolled patients with active axSpA (BASDAI ≥4) having predominantly axial disease (≤1 active joint currently) and inadequate response to NSAIDs. They were randomized to receive either oral prednisolone (n = 32) or placebo (n = 33) at a dose of 60, 40, 30, 20, 15 and 10 mg daily for 1 week each, following which they received 5 mg prednisolone (or placebo) daily for 18 weeks. The primary endpoint was a 50% improvement in the BASDAI (BASDAI50) at week 24. Analysis was intention to treat. Results A BASDAI50 was achieved by 12 of 32 patients (37.5%) in the prednisolone arm and 3 of 33 patients (9.1%) in the placebo arm at 24 weeks [difference 28.4% (95% CI 7.9, 46.7)]. However, there was no difference in achieving a 20 or 40% improvement in the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society response between the groups. Although there was a significant intergroup difference in adjusted ΔBASDAI and ΔAnkylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score with CRP at 24 weeks, there was no difference at 12 weeks. There was also no significant difference in ΔBASFI, ΔBAS-G or ΔBASMI at 12 or 24 weeks. No serious adverse events were noted. There was significant weight gain in the first 12 weeks in the prednisolone group vs placebo [0.9 (s.d. 0.4) kg], but not at 24 weeks. Conclusions In this small study, oral prednisolone was efficacious in axSpA in achieving the primary outcome, but many crucial secondary outcomes such as functional improvement were not met. Its impact on bone loss was not studied. Trial registration: CTRI/2018/01/011342.

The Efficacy and Safety of Tanacetum Parthenium (Feverfew) in Migraine Prophylaxis—a Double-Blind, Multicentre, Randomized Placebo-Controlled Dose-Response Study

Cephalalgia ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 22 (7) ◽  
pp. 523-532 ◽  
Author(s):  
V Pfaffenrath ◽  
HC Diener ◽  
M Fischer ◽  
M Friede ◽  
HH Henneicke-von Zepelin
Keyword(s):  
Dose Response ◽  
Baseline Period ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Tanacetum Parthenium ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Efficacy Parameter

Tanacetum parthenium (feverfew), is a well-known herb for the prophylactic treatment of migraine. The primary objective was to show a dose-response of a new stable extract (MIG-99) reproducibly manufactured with supercritical CO2 from feverfew ( T. parthenium). Furthermore, the study should provide data on the safety and tolerability of MIG-99. In a randomized, double-blind, multicentre, controlled trial with an adaptive design, the clinical efficacy and safety of three dosages of MIG-99 (2.08 mg; 6.25 mg; 18.75 mg t.i.d.) were compared with placebo. The patients ( n = 147) suffered from migraine with and without aura according to International Headache Society (IHS) criteria and were treated with one of the study medications for 12 weeks after a 4-week baseline period. The primary efficacy parameter was the number of migraine attacks during the last 28 days of the treatment period compared with baseline. Secondary endpoints were total and average duration and intensity of migraine attacks, mean duration of the single attack, number of days with accompanying migraine symptoms, number of days with inability to work due to migraine as well as type and amount of additionally taken medications for the treatment of migraine attacks. The design of the study included a pre-planned adaptive interim analysis for patients with at least four migraine attacks within the baseline period. With respect to the primary and secondary efficacy parameter, a statistically significant difference was not found between the overall and the confirmatory intention-to-treat (ITT) sample in the exploratorily analysed four treatment groups. The frequency of migraine attacks for the predefined confirmatory subgroup of patients ( n = 49) with at least four migraine attacks during the baseline period decreased in a dose-dependent manner ( P = 0.001). The highest absolute change of migraine attacks was observed under treatment with 6.25 mg t.i.d. (mean ± SD = x1.8 ± 1.5 per 28 days) compared with placebo (-0.3 ± 1.9; P = 0.02). Overall, 52 of 147 (35%) patients reported at least one adverse event (AE). The incidence of AEs in the active treatment groups was similar to that in the placebo group, and no dose-related effect was observed in any safety parameter. MIG-99 failed to show a significant migraine prophylactic effect in general. Accordingly, in the ITT analysis a dose-response relationship could not be observed. MIG-99 was shown to be effective only in a small predefined subgroup of patients with at least four attacks during the 28-day baseline period where the most favourable benefit-risk ratio was observed with a dosage of three capsules of 6.25 mg MIG-99 extract per day. Because of the low number of patients, these findings need to be verified in a larger sample. The incidence of AEs was similar for all treatment groups.

A prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial of the effect of topical bupivacaine on post-operative pain in bilateral nasal surgery with bilateral nasal packs inserted

2005 ◽  
Vol 119 (4) ◽  
pp. 284-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Malcolm A Buchanan ◽  
Graham R Dunn ◽  
Gillian M MacDougall
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Local Anaesthetic ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Nasal Surgery ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Control Power ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Significant Difference

To ascertain whether local anaesthetic use is of clinical benefit in nasal surgery, a prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial of topical bupivacaine on post-operative pain in patients packed after bilateral nasal surgery was carried out. Each patient received a bupivacaine-soaked and a saline-soaked Merocel pack, thereby acting as their own control. Power analysis ascertained the number of patients required to enter the trial to detect a statistically significant difference in pain. Fifty-seven patients completed the trial. Visual analogue scales determined the level of post-operative pain at different time points in each nostril. Less pain was demonstrated in nostrils containing bupivacaine-soaked packs compared with saline-soaked packs at two hours (p < 0.0001), four hours (p = 0.0183) and six hours (p = 0.0476) post-operatively. Although not statistically significant, less pain was noted on pack removal on the local anaesthetic sides. These results provide clinical-based evidence for the use of bupivacaine as a local anaesthetic in reducing pain following nasal surgery with packing.

scholarly journals Controlled Trial of a 5-Day Course of Telithromycin versus Doxycycline for Treatment of Mild to Moderate Scrub Typhus

2007 ◽  
Vol 51 (6) ◽  
pp. 2011-2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong-Min Kim ◽  
Ki Dong Yu ◽  
Ji Hyun Lee ◽  
Hyun Kuk Kim ◽  
Seung-Hyun Lee
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Scrub Typhus ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Sensitivity Study ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
New Antibiotics

ABSTRACT New antibiotics are required to have the antibacterial activity against doxycycline-resistant Orientia tsutsugamushi. An in vitro sensitivity study showed that telithromycin was more effective than erythromycin for Rickettsia, Bartonella, and Coxiella burnetii. In this prospective, open-label, randomized trial, we enrolled patients with mild-to-moderate scrub typhus. We compared the efficacy and safety of a 5-day telithromycin therapy with those of a 5-day doxycycline therapy at Chosun University Hospital or one of its two community-based affiliated hospitals (Jangheung Hospital and Cheomdan Hospital), which are all located in southwestern Korea, between September and December 2005. A total of 92 patients were randomly assigned to either the telithromycin group (n = 47) or the doxycycline group (n = 45). After the treatment, fever control time was 20.45 ± 12.9 h in the telithromycin group and 22.60 ± 21.44 h in the doxycycline group (P > 0.05). After the treatment, the cure rate was 100% in the telithromycin group and 97.8% in the doxycycline group (P > 0.05). Furthermore, there were no significant differences in time elapsed until such symptoms as headache, myalgia, and rash disappeared. No serious adverse events or death were noted following the treatment in both groups. There were no significant differences in adverse events. In conclusion, the efficacy and safety of a 5-day once-a-day regimen of 800 mg telithromycin were equivalent to those of a 5-day twice-a-day regimen of 100 mg doxycycline in patients with mild-to-moderate scrub typhus. Telithromycin could be considered a promising new antibacterial agent for patients with scrub typhus.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document