Efficacy of Phenazone in the Treatment of Acute Migraine Attacks: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Study

Cephalalgia ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (10) ◽  
pp. 888-893 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Göbel ◽  
A Heinze ◽  
U Niederberger ◽  
T Witt ◽  
V Zumbroich
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Acute Migraine ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Main Target

In this study we compared the efficacy of 1000 mg phenazone with that of placebo in the treatment of acute migraine attacks in a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 208 patients. The main target criterion was the number of patients with a pain reduction from severe or moderate to slight or no pain 2 h after taking the pain medication. The percentage of patients satisfying the main target criterion was 48.6% for phenazone and 27.2% ( P < 0.05) for placebo. Freedom from pain after 2 h was reported by 27.6% with phenazone treatment and 13.6% ( P < 0.05) with placebo. Compared with placebo, the phenazone treatment also resulted in a significant improvement in the associated migraine symptoms of nausea, phonophobia and photophobia. Of patients treated with phenazone 11.4%, and 5.8% of those treated with placebo reported adverse events. There was no significant difference between the groups with regard to numbers of patients with adverse events. No serious adverse events occurred. The results show that phenazone at a dosage of 1000 mg is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of acute migraine attacks.

Safety and efficacy of glycopyrrolate as a premedication for endoscopic submucosal dissection: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Endoscopy ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 49 (10) ◽  
pp. 949-956 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eui Kim ◽  
Min Um ◽  
Kyoung Kim ◽  
Jung Kim ◽  
Su Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Research Information ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
Submucosal Dissection

Abstract Background and study aims Anticholinergic premedication has not been validated for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we investigated the efficacy and safety of glycopyrrolate as a premedication for ESD. Methods A total of 196 patients undergoing ESD at a single tertiary medical center between December 2014 and February 2016 were randomly allocated to receive one of the following two premedications: glycopyrrolate (0.004 mg/kg intramuscularly [IM]) or placebo (2.0 mL normal saline solution IM). All patients received the premedication 30 minutes prior to ESD in a double-blind manner. The endoscopists reported the ease of performing the procedure and the incidence of secretion-induced hypoxemia, cough, and other procedure-related adverse events. Results Glycopyrrolate and placebo were received by 96 and 100 patients, respectively. ESD was successfully performed in all patients without any serious adverse events related to sedation or ESD. The median visual analog scale for procedure ease was higher in the glycopyrrolate group at 8 (interquartile range [IQR] 7 – 9) vs. 7 (IQR 6 – 8.25); P < 0.001. The proportions of patients with secretion-induced hypoxemia (4.4 % vs. 14.3 %; P = 0.03) and cough (16.7 % vs. 35.7 %; P = 0.005) were lower in the glycopyrrolate group.  Conclusions The use of glycopyrrolate as a premedication for ESD significantly improved the ease of performing the procedure and reduced the incidence of secretion-induced hypoxemia and cough during ESD. Glycopyrrolate may be a promising premedication to ensure safe and stable ESD procedures.Trial registration: Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS): KCT0001540.

scholarly journals A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Compound Glycyrrhizin Capsules Combined with a Topical Corticosteroid in Adults with Chronic Eczema

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Wei Xu ◽  
Yan Li ◽  
Mei Ju ◽  
Wei Lai ◽  
Xueyan Lu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Topical Corticosteroid ◽  
Group Versus ◽  
Treated Group ◽  
Lower Limbs ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Chronic Eczema

Background. Glycyrrhizin is widely used in skin disorders, such as psoriasis, alopecia areata, and allergic diseases, but has not been extensively studied in patients with chronic eczema. Objective. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral compound glycyrrhizin (OCG) plus topical corticosteroid (TCS) in adults with chronic eczema. Methods. This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in patients with chronic eczema (n = 199). Randomized participants from 6 centers in China received either 75 mg OCG capsules or placebo capsules three times a day and TCS (i.e., 0.1% mometasone furoate ointment) once a day for 28 days. Efficacy was determined by analyzing the mean change from the baseline using standardized measures including the Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) score, Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), and the visual analogue scale score (VAS) of itching. Results. Decreases in absolute EASI were significantly greater in the OCG-treated group versus placebo on day 14 (−3.41 ± 1.41 vs. −2.71 ± 1.25, P<0.001) and day 28 (−7.39 ± 1.71 vs. −6.64 ± 1.75, P=0.003). OCG-treated patients also saw greater benefit in other EASI metrics including EASI-50 (96.8% vs. 87.9%, P=0.021) and EASI-75 (47.9% vs. 21.2%, P<0.001) on day 28 compared with placebo. The absolute IGA score reductions were also significantly greater in the OCG group than the placebo (all P<0.05). In addition, proportions of patients who achieve clear (0) IGA scores or almost clear (1) IGA scores were significantly higher in the treated group than placebo on day 14 (22.8% vs. 6.2%, P=0.001) and day 28 (93.5% vs. 79.4%, P=0.005). Moreover, the proportions of patients with reduced pruritus were significantly greater in the treated group than placebo on day 28 (94.7% vs. 83.8%, P=0.016) and eczema recurrence was notably less in the OCG group versus placebo (3.19% vs. 12.12%, P=0.021). Eleven patients experienced adverse events, but there was no significant difference in the proportion of patients affected (3.0% vs. 8.5%, P>0.05). The most common adverse events were edema of both lower limbs. Conclusion. For adults with chronic eczema, OCG capsules combined with TCS is an effective and well-tolerated treatment, suggesting that OCG may be a useful nonsteroidal agent with an additional effect for the treatment of chronic eczema by TCS.

scholarly journals Deferasirox reduces iron overload significantly in nontransfusion-dependent thalassemia: 1-year results from a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. 970-977 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali T. Taher ◽  
John Porter ◽  
Vip Viprakasit ◽  
Antonis Kattamis ◽  
Suporn Chuncharunee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Iron Overload ◽  
Serum Ferritin ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Iron Concentration ◽  
Iron Chelation ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Liver Iron ◽  
Double Blind Placebo

Abstract Nontransfusion-dependent thalassemia (NTDT) patients may develop iron overload and its associated complications despite receiving only occasional or no transfusions. The present 1-year, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled THALASSA (Assessment of Exjade in Nontransfusion-Dependent Thalassemia) trial assessed the efficacy and safety of deferasirox in iron-overloaded NTDT patients. A total of 166 patients were randomized in a 2:1:2:1 ratio to starting doses of 5 or 10 mg/kg/d of deferasirox or placebo. The means ± SD of the actual deferasirox doses received over the duration of the study in the 5 and 10 mg/kg/d starting dose cohorts were 5.7 ± 1.4 and 11.5 ± 2.9 mg/kg/d, respectively. At 1 year, the liver iron concentration (LIC) decreased significantly compared with placebo (least-squares mean [LSM] ± SEM, −2.33 ± 0.7 mg Fe/g dry weight [dw], P = .001, and −4.18 ± 0.69 mg Fe/g dw, P < .001) for the 5 and 10 mg/kg/d deferasirox groups, respectively (baseline values [means ± SD], 13.11 ± 7.29 and 14.56 ± 7.92 mg Fe/g dw, respectively). Similarly, serum ferritin decreased significantly compared with placebo by LSM −235 and −337 ng/mL for the deferasirox 5 and 10 mg/kg/d groups, respectively (P < .001). In the placebo patients, LIC and serum ferritin increased from baseline by 0.38 mg Fe/g dw and 115 ng/mL (LSM), respectively. The most common drug-related adverse events were nausea (n = 11; 6.6%), rash (n = 8; 4.8%), and diarrhea (n = 6; 3.6%). This is the first randomized study showing that iron chelation with deferasirox significantly reduces iron overload in NTDT patients with a frequency of overall adverse events similar to placebo.

Comparing Schizophrenia Patients With a Predicted High/Low Risk of Nonresponse Receiving Treatment with Ziprasidone and Haloperidol: A Randomized-Controlled Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (04) ◽  
pp. 180-185
Author(s):  
Rebecca Schennach ◽  
Michael Riedel ◽  
Ilja Spellmann ◽  
Richard Musil ◽  
Michael Obermeier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Antipsychotic Treatment ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Syndrome Scale ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Negative Syndrome

Abstract Introduction The aim of this double-blind randomized study was to evaluate the response to antipsychotic treatment in schizophrenia patients with predicted high/low risk of nonresponse identified by applying a set of well-established scales and predictors of outcome and to compare efficacy between ziprasidone and haloperidol. Methods One hundred twelve schizophrenia patients (ziprasidone: n=54; haloperidol: n=58) were rated weekly on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS), the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF), the Social and Occupational Functioning Scale (SOFAS), the Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS), and Hillside Akathisia Scale (HAS). Results Ninety-two patients (82%) were predicted to have a high risk of nonresponse. No significant difference regarding PANSS improvement in this subsample was found comparing ziprasidone and haloperidol (p=0.563). Also, for the total patient sample, no significant difference was found regarding the course of the PANSS total score, GAF (p=0.921), and SOFAS (p=0.658) between ziprasidone and haloperidol. Haloperidol resulted in higher scores on the SAS (p=0.001) and HAS (p=0.011). Discussion An alarmingly high number of patients were at high risk of nonresponse to antipsychotic treatment.

scholarly journals Simultaneous Use of Carbamazepine and Lithium in the Treatment of Outpatients with Rapid Cycle Bipolar Disorder: Randomized, Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study

Psychiatry ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 74-79
Author(s):  
N. A. Aliev ◽  
Z. N. Aliev
Keyword(s):  
Bipolar Disorder ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Bipolar Disorders ◽  
Placebo Treatment ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
Number Of Patients

Purpose: rapid cycle bipolar disorder may be more resistant to treatment than other bipolar disorders. However, the effect of the synergistic use of carbamazepine and lithium in the treatment of outpatients with rapid cycle bipolar disorder without psychiatric comorbidity has not been studied in a double-blind, placebo-controlled design.Patients and methods: participants in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study met DSM-5 criteria for bipolar disorder with a rapid cycle between the ages of 18 and 65 years. The response and side effects of carbamazepine, lithium, and placebo were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and chi-square tests. The respondent underwent F2, demonstrating superiority with respect to carbamazepine and lithium than in the case of placebo. Carbamazepine and lithium were generally well tolerated by the study patients, although a larger number of patients receiving carbamazepine and lithium (n = 2) early discontinued the study due to side effects.Results: twenty-seven of the 36 participants taking the combined carbamazepine and lithium regimen responded at 12 weeks, compared with six of 38 participants who received a placebo (p < 0.001). Two common side effects that led to discontinuation of carbamazepine and the lithium group were allergic reaction and drowsiness. Frequent complaints of sweating and headache during placebo treatment occurred in two out of 38 men. There were no unexpected or serious adverse events.Conclusions: the combined use of carbamazepine and lithium in the treatment of outpatients with rapid cycle bipolar disorder has demonstrated superior use of carbamazepine and lithium than placebo.

Abstract 4420: Results of A Double Blind Placebo Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of PS433540 in Human Subjects with Hypertension

Circulation ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 118 (suppl_18) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel M Neutel ◽  
Wilford F Germino ◽  
Henry Punzi ◽  
Mark McBride ◽  
Catherine C Bryson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Placebo Group ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Human Subjects ◽  
Antihypertensive Agents ◽  
Epidemiologic Studies ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
Link Type

Epidemiologic studies continue to demonstrate extremely disappointing blood pressure (BP) control rates. For this reason, the search for more effective antihypertensive agents continues. PS433540 is the first compound in a novel class of agents called Dual Acting Receptor Antagonists (DARA) which selectively block angiotensin (AT 1 ) and endothelin (ET A ) receptors. In this prospective, randomized, double blind, placebo controlled study, 234 men and women with a mean age of 56.0 years entered a 3– 4 week single blind placebo run-in period. Qualifying stage I or stage II hypertensive patients were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to either PS433540 200mg, 500mg or matching placebo for a period of 4 weeks. Ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) was performed at the start of the study and was repeated at the end of the treatment period. PS433540 lowered both 24HR Systolic BP (SBP) and Diastolic DBP (DBP) as well as mean office SBP and DBP to a greater extent than placebo, p<0.001. (see Table ) PS433540 was well tolerated with 2 reported serious adverse events in the placebo group and placebo lead-in period. Three patients (all from the placebo group) were discontinued from the study for adverse events. There were no significant laboratory abnormalities. This study demonstrates that PS433540 is an effective and well tolerated new class of antihypertensive agent that may prove to be a very important addition to our armamentarium for the management of hypertension.

scholarly journals Involvement of N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors in plasticity induced by paired corticospinal-motoneuronal stimulation in humans

2018 ◽  
Vol 119 (2) ◽  
pp. 652-661 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siobhan C. Dongés ◽  
Jessica M. D’Amico ◽  
Jane E. Butler ◽  
Janet L. Taylor
Keyword(s):  
Biceps Brachii ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Spinal Level ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
Human Spinal Cord ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Antidromic Potentials ◽  
Dependent Mechanism

Plasticity can be induced at human corticospinal-motoneuronal synapses by delivery of repeated, paired stimuli to corticospinal axons and motoneurons in a technique called paired corticospinal-motoneuronal stimulation (PCMS). To date, the mechanisms of the induced plasticity are unknown. To determine whether PCMS-induced plasticity is dependent on N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors (NMDARs), the effect of the noncompetitive NMDAR antagonist dextromethorphan on PCMS-induced facilitation was assessed in a 2-day, double-blind, placebo-controlled experiment. PCMS consisted of 100 pairs of stimuli, delivered at an interstimulus interval that produces facilitation at corticospinal-motoneuronal synapses that excite biceps brachii motoneurons. Transcranial magnetic stimulation elicited corticospinal volleys, which were timed to arrive at corticospinal-motoneuronal synapses just before antidromic potentials elicited in motoneurons with electrical brachial plexus stimulation. To measure changes in the corticospinal pathway at a spinal level, biceps responses to cervicomedullary stimulation (cervicomedullary motor evoked potentials, CMEPs) were measured before and for 30 min after PCMS. Individuals who displayed a ≥10% increase in CMEP size after PCMS on screening were eligible to take part in the 2-day experiment. After PCMS, there was a significant difference in CMEP area between placebo and dextromethorphan days ( P = 0.014). On the placebo day PCMS increased average CMEP areas to 127 ± 46% of baseline, whereas on the dextromethorphan day CMEP area was decreased to 86 ± 33% of baseline (mean ± SD; placebo: n = 11, dextromethorphan: n = 10). Therefore, dextromethorphan suppressed the facilitation of CMEPs after PCMS. This indicates that plasticity induced at synapses in the human spinal cord by PCMS may be dependent on NMDARs. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Paired corticospinal-motoneuronal stimulation can strengthen the synaptic connections between corticospinal axons and motoneurons at a spinal level in humans. The mechanism of the induced plasticity is unknown. In our 2-day, double-blind, placebo-controlled study we show that the N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) antagonist dextromethorphan suppressed plasticity induced by paired corticospinal-motoneuronal stimulation, suggesting that an NMDAR-dependent mechanism is involved.

scholarly journals Faecal microbiota transplantation alters gut microbiota in patients with irritable bowel syndrome: results from a randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled study

Gut ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (12) ◽  
pp. 2107-2115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sofie Ingdam Halkjær ◽  
Alice Højer Christensen ◽  
Bobby Zhao Sheng Lo ◽  
Patrick Denis Browne ◽  
Stig Günther ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gut Microbiota ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Symptom Relief ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Faecal Microbiota ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
Faecal Microbiota Transplantation ◽  
Faecal Samples ◽  
Significant Difference

ObjectiveIBS is associated with an intestinal dysbiosis and faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been hypothesised to have a positive effect in patients with IBS. We performed a randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled trial to investigate if FMT resulted in an altered gut microbiota and improvement in clinical outcome in patients with IBS.DesignWe performed this study in 52 adult patients with moderate-to-severe IBS. At the screening visit, clinical history and symptoms were assessed and faecal samples were collected. Patients were randomised to FMT or placebo capsules for 12 days and followed for 6 months. Study visits were performed at baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months, where patients were asked to register their symptoms using the IBS-severity scoring system (IBS-SSS) and IBS-specific quality of life (IBS-QoL). Prior to each visit, faecal samples were collected.ResultsA significant difference in improvement in IBS-SSS score was observed 3 months after treatment (p=0.012) favouring placebo. This was similar for IBS-QoL data after 3 months (p=0.003) favouring placebo. Patients receiving FMT capsules had an increase in faecal microbial biodiversity while placebos did not.ConclusionIn this randomised double-blinded placebo-controlled study, we found that FMT changed gut microbiota in patients with IBS. But patients in the placebo group experienced greater symptom relief compared with the FMT group after 3 months. Altering the gut microbiota is not enough to obtain clinical improvement in IBS. However, different study designs and larger studies are required to examine the role of FMT in IBS.Trial registration numberNCT02788071.

Economic evaluation of the randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of subcutaneous ketamine in the management of chronic cancer pain

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 74-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikki McCaffrey ◽  
Thomas Flint ◽  
Billingsley Kaambwa ◽  
Belinda Fazekas ◽  
Debra Rowett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Cancer Pain ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
Cost Effective Treatment ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Cost

Background: Treating chronic, uncontrolled, cancer pain with subcutaneous ketamine in patients unresponsive to opioids and co-analgesics remains controversial, especially in light of recent evidence demonstrating ketamine does not have net clinical benefit in this setting. Aim: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of subcutaneous ketamine versus placebo in this patient population. Design and setting: A within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis of the Australian Palliative Care Clinical Studies Collaborative’s randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ketamine was conducted from a healthcare provider perspective. Mean costs and outcomes were estimated from participant-level data over 5 days including positive response, health-related quality of life (HrQOL) measured with the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy–Palliative Care (FACIT-Pal), ketamine costs, medication usage and in-patient stays. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in responder rates, but higher toxicity and worse HrQOL for ketamine participants (mean change −3.10 (standard error (SE) 1.76), ketamine n = 93; 4.53 (SE 1.38), placebo n = 92). Estimated total mean costs were AU$706 higher per ketamine participant (AU$6608) compared with placebo (AU$5902), attributable to the cost of higher in-patient costs as well as costs of ketamine administration. The results were robust to sensitivity analyses accounting for different medication use costing methods and removal of cost outliers. Conclusion: The findings suggest subcutaneous ketamine in conjunction with opioids and standard adjuvant therapy is neither an effective nor cost-effective treatment for refractory pain in advanced cancer patients.

scholarly journals A Phase 1 Randomized Placebo-Controlled Study to Assess the Safety, Immunogenicity and Genetic Stability of a New Potential Pandemic H7N9 Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine in Healthy Adults

Vaccines ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 296
Author(s):  
Irina Kiseleva ◽  
Irina Isakova-Sivak ◽  
Marina Stukova ◽  
Marianna Erofeeva ◽  
Svetlana Donina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Influenza Vaccine ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Healthy Adults ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Temperature Sensitive ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Human Influenza Virus ◽  
Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine

This study describes a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled phase I clinical trial in healthy adults of a new potential pandemic H7N9 live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) based on the human influenza virus of Yangtze River Delta hemagglutinin lineage (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03739229). Two doses of H7N9 LAIV or placebo were administered intranasally to 30 and 10 subjects, respectively. The vaccine was well-tolerated and not associated with increased rates of adverse events or with any serious adverse events. Vaccine virus was detected in nasal swabs during the 6 days after vaccination or revaccination. A lower frequency of shedding was observed after the second vaccination. Twenty-five clinical viral isolates obtained after the first and second doses of vaccine retained the temperature-sensitive and cold-adapted phenotypic characteristics of LAIV. There was no confirmed transmission of the vaccine strain from vaccinees to placebo recipients. After the two H7N9 LAIV doses, an immune response was observed in 96.6% of subjects in at least one of the assays conducted.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document