scholarly journals POS0630 COMPARISON OF THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF ORIGINAL AND BIOSIMILAR ADALIMUMAB MOLECULES IN CHILDHOOD RHEUMATIC DISEASES

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 553.1-553
Author(s):  
K. Ulu ◽  
F. Demir ◽  
T. Coşkuner ◽  
Ş. Çağlayan ◽  
B. Sözeri
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Rheumatic Diseases ◽  
Behcet’S Disease ◽  
Behçet's Disease ◽  
Inactive Disease ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Abp 501

Background:The TNF-α inhibitor adalimumab is a biological disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD) that has been used in different rheumatic diseases with a resistant course. ABP-501 is a biosimilar product (BP) of adalimumab, recently approved by the FDA and EMA. To our knowledge, there is no study assess the efficacy and safety of these two molecules on pediatric patients.Objectives:We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of the original and biosimilar adalimumab (ABP-501) molecules in childhood rheumatic diseases.Methods:This non-interventional, retrospective, single-centre analysis carried out in Umraniye Training and Resrach Hospital, Pediatric Rheumatology Clinic, Istanbul, Turkey. The study group consisted of patients who were followed due to chronic rheumatic disease between January 1, 2016 and June 1, 2020, and received reference or biosimilar adalimumab therapy for at least three months. Demographic and clinical data of patients were collected at baseline, 3rd, 6th, and 12th months of treatment. Disease activity assessment was made with JADAS-27 in JIA patients, with SUN criteria in uveitis patients, and with Behçet’s Disease Activity Index in BD patients. Efficacy and safety of treatments were compared between reference and biosimilar adalimumab groups.Results:A total of 89 patients (65 with original and 24 with biosimilar molecule) treated with adalimumab, were included in the study. There were 45 female and 44 male in the study, and the median age at the initiation of the adalimumab was 166 months (min-max: 36-231). Of the 89 patients evaluated, the primary diagnoses of 62 were juvenile idiopathic arthritis, 13 were idiopathic uveitis, eight were Behçet’s disease, three were Blau syndrome, two were chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis and one was Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada syndrome. 63 of the patients were biologic-naïve, and 13 were switched from etanercept, 11 from infliximab, and two from other bDMARDs. The median exposure time of adalimumab was 16 months (min-max:3-70) in RP and 14.5 months (min-max: 3-23) in BP. All patients had active disease before treatment. In the group treated with RP, inactive disease was achieved in 60%, 76.6% and 87.2% of the patients at the 3rd, 6th and 12th months, respectively. Also, inactive disease was achieved in 62.5%, 78.2% and 78.2% of the patients at the 3rd, 6th and 12th months in the group treated with BP, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in efficacy between the groups at the 3rd, 6th and 12th months (p=0.83, 0.07 and 0.32). Serious adverse events were seen in one patient in each groups (lymphoma in RP group, tuberculous meningitis in BP group). Non-serious adverse events were observed in eight patients (12.3%) in the RP group and in two patients (8.3%) in the BP group, without statistically significant difference between groups (p=0.86).Conclusion:No significant difference was observed between the biosimilar adalimumab ABP-501 and RP adalimumab in terms of efficacy and safety.References:[1]Renton, William D et al. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2019;17(1):67.[2]Lovell DJ, Ruperto N, Goodman S, et al. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(8):810-820.[3]Kingsbury, Daniel J et al. Clin Rheumatol 2014;33(10):1433-41.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

Efficacy and safety of pharmacological cachexia interventions: systematic review and network meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
pp. bmjspcare-2020-002601
Author(s):  
Manit Saeteaw ◽  
Phitjira Sanguanboonyaphong ◽  
Jukapun Yoodee ◽  
Kaitlyn Craft ◽  
Ratree Sawangjit ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Total Body Weight ◽  
Megestrol Acetate ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Pharmacological Interventions ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Significant Difference

AimsRandomised controlled trials (RCTs) demonstrated benefits of pharmacological interventions for cachexia in improving weight and appetite. However, comparative efficacy and safety are not available. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to evaluate the relative efficacy and safety of pharmacological interventions for cachexia.MethodsPubMed, EmBase, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for RCTs until October 2019. Key outcomes were total body weight (TBW) improvement, appetite (APP) score and serious adverse events. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. NMA was performed to estimate weight gain and APP score increase at 8 weeks, presented as mean difference (MD) or standardised MD with 95% CI.Results80 RCTs (10 579 patients) with 12 treatments were included. Majority is patients with cancer (7220). Compared with placebo, corticosteroids, high-dose megestrol acetate combination (Megace_H_Com) (≥400 mg/day), medroxyprogesterone, high-dose megestrol acetate (Megace_H) (≥400 mg/day), ghrelin mimetic and androgen analogues (Androgen) were significantly associated with MD of TBW of 6.45 (95% CI 2.45 to 10.45), 4.29 (95% CI 2.23 to 6.35), 3.18 (95% CI 0.94 to 5.41), 2.66 (95% CI 1.47 to 3.85), 1.73 (95% CI 0.27 to 3.20) and 1.50 (95% CI 0.56 to 2.44) kg. For appetite improvement, Megace_H_Com, Megace_H and Androgen significantly improved standardised APP score, compared with placebo. There is no significant difference in serious adverse events from all interventions compared with placebo.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that several pharmacological interventions have potential to offer benefits in treatment of cachexia especially Megace_H and short-term use corticosteroids. Nonetheless, high-quality comparative studies to compare safety and efficacy are warranted for better management of cachexia.

scholarly journals A randomized phase II trial of efficacy and safety of the immunotherapy ALECSAT as an adjunct to radiotherapy and temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katja Werlenius ◽  
Giuseppe Stragliotto ◽  
Michael Strandeus ◽  
Malin Blomstrand ◽  
Helena Carén ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background There is an urgent need for effective treatments against glioblastoma (GBM). In this trial we investigated the efficacy and safety of an adoptive cell-based immunotherapy. Methods Patients with newly diagnosed GBM were recruited at four study sites in Sweden. The patients were randomized 1:2 to receive either radiotherapy (RT), 60 Gy/30 fractions, with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) only, or RT and TMZ with addition of Autologous Lymphoid Effector Cells Specific Against Tumor (ALECSAT) in an open-label phase II trial. Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were survival and safety of ALECSAT. Results Sixty-two patients were randomized to either RT and TMZ alone (n=22) or RT and TMZ with ALECSAT (n=40). Median age was 57 years (range 38-69), 95% of the patients were in good performance status (WHO 0-1). There was no significant difference between the study arms (SOC vs. ALECSAT + SOC) in PFS (7.9 vs. 7.8 months; HR 1.28; 95% CI 0.70, 2.36; P=0.42), or in median overall survival (OS) (18.3 vs. 19.2 months; HR 1.16, 95% CI 0.58, 2.31; P=0.67). The treatment groups were balanced in terms of serious adverse events (52.4% vs. 52.5%), but adverse events ≥ grade 3 were more common in the experimental arm (81.0% vs. 92.5%). Conclusion Addition of ALECSAT immunotherapy to standard treatment with radiochemotherapy was well tolerated but did not improve PFS or OS for patients with newly diagnosed GBM.

scholarly journals Extension Study of Participants from the Trial of Early Aggressive Therapy in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

2014 ◽  
Vol 41 (12) ◽  
pp. 2459-2465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol A. Wallace ◽  
Sarah Ringold ◽  
John Bohnsack ◽  
Steven J. Spalding ◽  
Hermine I. Brunner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Clinical Remission ◽  
Safety Information ◽  
Disease Status ◽  
Inactive Disease ◽  
Global Evaluation ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Aggressive Therapy

Objective.To follow children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) who had completed at least 6 months of the TRial of Early Aggressive Therapy (TREAT) clinical study for an additional 2 years, describing safety of early aggressive treatment, disease activity, function, and duration of clinical inactive disease (CID) during followup.Methods.Children were treated as per provider’s discretion. Physician, patient/parent, and laboratory measures of disease status as well as safety information were collected at clinic visits every 3 months for up to 2 years.Results.Forty-eight children were followed for a mean of 28 months (range 12–42) beyond the end of the TREAT study. Half of patients were in CID for > 50% of their followup time. Overall, 88% of patients achieved CID at > 1 study visit and 54% achieved clinical remission while taking medication. Six patients were in CID for the duration of the study, and, of those, 2 achieved a full year of clinical remission while not taking medication. Active disease was mild: mean physician’s global assessment 2.4, active joint count 3.5, parent global evaluation 2.4, Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire 0.32, erythrocyte sedimentation rate 19 mm/h, and morning stiffness 23 min. There were no serious adverse events or adverse events reported at grade 3 or higher of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events.Conclusion.Early aggressive therapy in this cohort of patients with polyarticular JIA who had high initial disease activity was associated with prolonged periods of CID in the majority of patients during followup. Those not in CID had low levels of disease activity.

scholarly journals Proinflammatory Cytokines and C-Reactive Protein in Uveitis Associated with Behçet’s Disease

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marina Mesquida ◽  
Blanca Molins ◽  
Victor Llorenç ◽  
Maite Sainz de la Maza ◽  
María Victoria Hernandez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Activity ◽  
Behçet’S Disease ◽  
Behcet’S Disease ◽  
Behçet's Disease ◽  
Visual Outcome ◽  
Inactive Disease ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
Behcet's Disease ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Cytokine Profiles

The aim of the present study was to determine the serum cytokine profile and levels of high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) in patients with uveitis associated with Behçet’s disease (BD) and to compare them with those obtained from healthy control subjects. We determined the serum concentration of interferon-γ(IFN-γ), interleukin-1β(IL-1β), IL-12p70, IL-17A, tumor necrosis factor-α(TNF-α), and hsCRP in 13 patients with active uveitis associated to BD, 24 inactive BD patients, and 20 controls. In a subgroup of 10 active patients, a second serum sample was obtained when the disease was inactive. Cytokine profiles and hsCRP levels were correlated with disease activity, severity, complications, and visual outcome. Levels of IFN-γand TNF-αwere significantly increased in patients with active uveitis associated to BD compared to controls (P<0.05). IFN-γ, TNF-α, and hsCRP were significantly higher during active uveitis associated to BD compared to inactive disease (P<0.05). Furthermore, IL-17A was significantly increased in patients with active BD without pharmacological treatment compared to controls (P<0.05). No significant correlations were found with specific cytokine profiles and disease severity, visual outcome, or complications. In summary, increased serum levels of IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-17A, and hsCRP were associated with active uveitis associated with BD and might serve as markers of disease activity.

scholarly journals The Efficacy and Safety of Mesalamine and Probiotics in Mild-to-Moderate Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Chunying Tian ◽  
Yang Huang ◽  
Xiaoxia Wu ◽  
Chuhan Xu ◽  
Huaien Bu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Disease Activity Index ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Symptom Scores ◽  
Endoscopic Score

Objective. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of mesalamine in conjunction with probiotics for ulcerative colitis. Methods. Random controlled trials (RCTs) were searched in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, and VIP (VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals) from inception to October 2019. Methodological quality was assessed by the Cochrane Collaboration tool. The quality of evidence was rated by the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). Data analysis was carried out in Review Manager 5.3. Results. A total of fifteen studies met the criteria for inclusion. Thirteen studies reported the clinical efficacy, three studies provided data on the clinical symptom scores, two trials reported disease activity index, four studies evaluated endoscopic score, and twelve studies reported adverse events. For ulcerative colitis (UC), mesalamine and probiotics had better clinical efficacy than mesalamine alone (≤8 weeks: RR = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.07–1.18, P<0.0001; >8 weeks: RR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.11–1.41, P=0.0003). On the clinical symptom scores, disease activity index, and endoscopic score, UC patients receiving mesalamine and probiotics had significant difference than patients receiving mesalazine alone (MD = −2.02, 95% CI: −3.28 to −0.76, P=0.002; MD = −1.20, 95% CI: −1.76 to −0.65, P<0.001; and MD = −0.42, 95% CI: −0.61 to −0.23, P<0.0001, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference in adverse events between the two groups (RR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.54 to 1.43, P=0.60). Conclusion. Our meta-analysis results supported that mesalamine and probiotics were effective and safe in treating ulcerative colitis.

scholarly journals Tear Nitric Oxide Levels in Behçet’s Disease

Medicina ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 48 (11) ◽  
pp. 81
Author(s):  
Yalçın İşcan ◽  
Ulviye Yiğit ◽  
Mehmet Erdoğan ◽  
Derya Erdoğan ◽  
Veysi Öner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nitric Oxide ◽  
Behçet’S Disease ◽  
Behcet’S Disease ◽  
Behçet's Disease ◽  
Inactive Disease ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Disease Group ◽  
Behcet's Disease ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Active Disease

The aim of this study was to evaluate the tear nitric oxide (NO) level in patients with Behçet’s disease and to compare it with that in healthy subjects. Material and Methods. The subjects were divided into 3 groups: the active disease, inactive disease, and control groups. NO concentrations were determined by a nitrate/nitrite colorimetric assay kit and measured spectrophotometrically at 540 nm. Results. The tear nitrate/nitrite levels were 0.06 nmol/μL (SD, 0.05) in the active disease group, 0.05 nmol/μL (SD, 0.05) in the inactive disease group, and 0.02 nmol/μL (SD, 0.01) in the control group. The tear nitrate/nitrite levels of both active and inactive groups were higher than those of the control group (P=0.001 and P=0.047, respectively), but there was no significant difference between the active and inactive groups. Conclusion. Our results demonstrated that the tear NO levels were elevated in the patients with Behçet’s disease. We imply that a better understanding of NO function in the pathogenesis of Behçet uveitis is necessary to develop new therapies based on the inhibitors of NO synthases.

P706Treatment of hypercholesterolaemia with PCSK-9 Inhibitors in Denmark. Assessment of real-life data; safety an extent of adverse effects after the first years of clinical use

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Mulverstedt ◽  
I C Klausen ◽  
M H Martinsen ◽  
H Kanstrup ◽  
K K Thomsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Plasma Lipids ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Outcome Studies ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Introduction PCSK9 Inhibitors (PCSK9 I) are a new group of drugs for treatment of hyperlipidaemia. These drugs have been available in Denmark since October 2015. From the two existing major outcome studies (FOURIER and ODYSSEY OUTCOMES) it has been shown that there was no significant difference in the risk of serious adverse events, discontinuation due to adverse events, neurocognitive events, diabetes-related events, muscle-related events, or myalgia in the treatment group, compared with the control group. In FOUIRER 12.5% came of treatment; In ODYSSEY the rate was 10.2–14.8%. Although this highlights the efficacy and safety in patients with cardiovascular disease, we have little knowledge of the use, efficacy and safety with these drugs in real-life populations Purpose We aim to describe the demography, the treatment efficacy and the extent of adverse effects among patients treated in Danish lipid clinics. Methods Data on all patients treated with PCSK9 I between October 1st, 2015 and May 1st, 2018 were obtained from lipid clinics in Denmark. A database containing information on medications before treatment, adverse effects, plasma lipids (LDL-C, Triglyceride, High density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C)) and supplementary blood tests was created. Levels of plasma lipids and organ markers (Creatinine, Hba1c or Alanine aminotransferase (ALAT)) at baseline and at follow up visits were analysed. Results Nationwide, 383 patients were included, an estimated 90% of all patients undergoing treatment with PCSK9 I in Denmark. A large proportion (n=243 - 63.4%) were described as statin intolerant and only 94 patients were receiving statins at baseline. Adverse effects (AE) were reported by 71 patients (18.5%) on PCSK9 I therapy and 50 patients (13.1%) stopped treatment. Most common AE were flu like symptoms and musculoskeletal aches. In two cases an increase in serum creatinine kinase was detected. One case of angioedema and three cases of local reactions to injections had been documented. No case of anaphylaxis was reported. Of the 71 patients with AEs 55 (77.5%) were statin intolerant. Of the 50, who came off treatment, 43 (86.0%) were statin intolerant. When treatment was stopped 15 patients (30.0%) tried the alternative PCSK9 Inhibitor (cross over). Of those, nine patients were able to tolerate the alternative PCSK9 I treatment. Conclusion Many patients (18.3%) reported AEs on a wide range of symptoms, but the rate of patients terminating PCSK9 I treatment was the same as found in the outcome studies (13.1% vs. 12.2 and 10.2–14.8%). Most of the patients who stopped treatment were statin intolerant and produced the same symptoms, as they had experienced with statins. Interestingly, nine of the 15 patients that were switched to the alternate PCSK9 I seems to tolerate this treatment.

Efficacy and Safety of Non-Steroidal Anti-Androgens in Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammed Rashid ◽  
Madhan Ramesh ◽  
K. Shamshavali ◽  
Amit Dang ◽  
Himanshu Patel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Quality Assessment ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the sixth primary cause of cancer death. However, conflicts are present about the efficacy and safety of Non-steroidal anti-androgens (NSAA) for its treatment. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of NSAAs versus any comparator for the treatment of advanced or metastatic PCa (mPCa). Methodology: MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library were searched. References of included studies and clinicaltrials.gov were also searched for relevant studies. Only English language studies after 1990 were considered for review. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the efficacy and safety of NSAAs as compared with any other comparator including surgery or chemotherapy in mPCa patients were included. The outcomes include efficacy, safety and the tolerability of the treatment. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool was used for quality assessment. Two authors were independently involved in the selection, extraction and quality assessment of included studies and disagreements were resolved by discussion or by consulting a third reviewer. Results: Fifty-eight out of 1307 non-duplicate RCTs with 29154 patients were considered for the review. NSAA showed significantly better progression-free survival [PFS] (Hazard ratio [HR], 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.46-0.78; P=0.0001), time to distant metastasis or death [TTD] (HR, 0.80; 95% CI 0.73-0.91; p<0.0001), objective response (Odds ratio [OR], 1.64; 95% CI 1.06-2.54; P=0.03) and clinical benefits (OR, 1.33; 95% CI 1.08-1.63; P=0.006) as compared to the control group. There was no significant difference observed between the groups in terms of overall survival (HR, 0.95; 95%CI, 0.87-1.03; P=0.18) and time to progression (HR, 0.93; 95% CI 0.77-1.11; P=0.43). Treatment-related adverse events were more with the NSAA group, but the discontinuation due to lack of efficacy reason was 43% significantly lesser than the control group in patients with mPCa. Rest of the outcomes were appeared to be non-significant. Conclusion: Treatment with NSAA was appeared to be better efficacious with respect to PFS, TTD, and response rate with considerable adverse events when compared to the control group in patients with metastatic PCa.

scholarly journals AB0531 GOLIMUMAB IN THE TREATMENT OF SEVERE AND/OR REFRACTORY VASCULO-BEHÇET’S DISEASE: A SINGLE-CENTRE EXPERIENCE IN CHINA

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1562.1-1563
Author(s):  
L. Sun ◽  
J. Liu ◽  
W. Zheng
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Regurgitation ◽  
Behçet’S Disease ◽  
Behcet’S Disease ◽  
Behçet's Disease ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Behcet's Disease ◽  
Severe Aortic Regurgitation ◽  
Tnf Α

Background:Vascular involvement is one of the leading causes of mortality and morbidity in Behcet’s Disease (BD)1. Surgical treatments are difficult for Vaculo-BD (VBD) patients due to the high risk of serious postoperative complications without effective and promptly perioperative immunotherapy2, 3. Anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) therapy has been reported as a potential treatment in severe VBD, e.g. infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADA). However, only few case reports are available regarding the fully humanized monoclonal antibody to TNF-α, golimumab (GOL), in the management of VBD4.Objectives:The objective of this study was to report the efficacy and safety of GOL for the treatment of severe and/or refractory VBD.Methods:We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety profile of patients with severe and/or refractory VBD treated with GOL in our medical center between 2018 to 2020.Results:Nine VBD patients (8 male and 1 female) were enrolled, with a mean age and median course of 37±8.6 years and 72 months (range 12 to 300), respectively. Cardiac involvements (severe aortic regurgitation secondary to BD) were presented in 7 patients, including 2 patients with post-operative paravalvular leakage (PVL) after aortic valve replacement surgery. Multiple vascular lesions were documented in the other 2 patients, including one patient with life-threatening multiple pulmonary aneurysms, pulmonary thromboembolism and recurrent deep vein thrombosis, and another patient with abdominal aortic pseudoaneurysm and multiple artery stenosis and occlusion. Prior to GOL therapy, all patients experienced disease progression despite high-dose glucocorticoids combined with multiple immunosuppressants. Moreover, seven patients required effective and fast control of inflammation and a decrease of glucocorticoid dose during the perioperative period. They were treated with GOL, 50mg every 4 weeks, in combination with background low-or medium-dose glucocorticoids and immunosuppressants, for a median of 6 (range 3-15) months. After a mean duration of follow-up of 10 (range 2-6) months, all patients achieved improvement both in clinical symptoms and serum inflammation markers. The ESR level [4.88±4.94 mm/h vs 31.13±31.78mm/h, P<0.01] and CRP level [1.9 (0.11-3.73)mg/L vs 24.3 (0.4-85.57)mg/L, P<0.01] significantly decreased. The dosage of glucocorticoid[10 (0-15) vs 40 (0-100)mg/d, P<0.01] effectively tapered, indicating a potential steroid-sparing effect. No newly-onset aneurysm and recurrent venous thrombosis were observed. Also, one patient had a marked reduction in size and number of pulmonary aneurysms. No post-operative PVL was observed in the five patients after Bentall operation with a median follow-up of 10 months. One patient with severe aortic regurgitation remained stable and without surgical intervention with the treatment of GOL for 16 months. No severe complication occurred in one patient after underwent endovascular repair of abdominal aorta for 8 months. GOL was well-tolerated, and no serious adverse event was observed.Conclusion:Our results suggested that GOL is safe and effective for the treatment of patients with severe and / or refractory VBD. Further controlled studies are warranted to confirm the therapeutic potential of GOL in VBD patients.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document