scholarly journals Understanding patient engagement in health system decision-making: a co-designed scoping review

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamara L. McCarron ◽  
Karen Moffat ◽  
Gloria Wilkinson ◽  
Sandra Zelinsky ◽  
Jamie M. Boyd ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Health System ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Patient Engagement

Systems thinking in health technology assessment: a scoping review

2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marina Richardson ◽  
Lauren C. Ramsay ◽  
Joanna M. Bielecki ◽  
Whitney Berta ◽  
Beate Sander
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Health System ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Systems Thinking ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Patient Care Team ◽  
Care Team ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Team Organization

Abstract Objective Our objective was to assess how, and to what extent, a systems-level perspective is considered in decision-making processes for health interventions by illustrating how studies define the boundaries of the system in their analyses and by defining the decision-making context in which a systems-level perspective is undertaken. Method We conducted a scoping review following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and EconLit were searched and key search concepts included decision making, system, and integration. Studies were classified according to an interpretation of the “system” of analysis used in each study based on a four-level model of the health system (patient, care team, organization, and/or policy environment) and using categories (based on intervention type and system impacts considered) to describe the decision-making context. Results A total of 2,664 articles were identified and 29 were included for analysis. Most studies (16/29; 55%) considered multiple levels of the health system (i.e., patient, care team, organization, environment) in their analysis and assessed multiple classes of interventions versus a single class of intervention (e.g., pharmaceuticals, screening programs). Approximately half (15/29; 52%) of the studies assessed the influence of policy options on the system as a whole, and the other half assessed the impact of interventions on other phases of the disease pathway or life trajectory (14/29; 48%). Conclusions We found that systems thinking is not common in areas where health technology assessments (HTAs) are typically conducted. Against this background, our study demonstrates the need for future conceptualizations and interpretations of systems thinking in HTA.

scholarly journals A Framework of Evidence-Based Decision-Making in Health System Management: A Best-Fit Framework Synthesis and a Scoping Review

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tahereh Shafaghat ◽  
Peivand Bastani ◽  
Mohammad Hasan Imani Nasab ◽  
Mohammad Amin Bahrami ◽  
Zahra Kavosi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Health System ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Developed Countries ◽  
System Management ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Public Health Decision ◽  
Best Fit ◽  
Evidence Based Decision Making

Abstract Background: Scientific evidence is the basis for improving public health; decision-making without sufficient attention to evidence may lead to unpleasant consequences. Despite efforts to create comprehensive guidelines and models for evidence-based decision-making (EBDM), there isn`t any to make the best decisions concerning scarce resources and unlimited needs. The present study aimed to develop a comprehensive applied framework for EBDM. Methods: This was a meta-synthesis including two phases of a Scoping Review (SR) and a Best-Fit Framework (BFF) synthesis conducted in 2019. A scoping review was done for the comprehensive review of the existing published studies in this area. The six-stage approach of Arksey and O’Malley was applied. Six main databases including PUBMED, Scopus, Web of Science, Science Direct, EMBASE, and ProQuest were searched using related keywords. Data were extracted and analyzed via thematic analysis. Results of the scoping review were then synthesized to achieve the best-fit framework applying Carroll et al (2013) approach. Results: Based on the SR, 3751 studies were found, and due to the full-text screening of the studies, 30 final articles were selected for extracting the components and steps of EBDM in Health System Management (HSM). After collecting, synthesizing, and categorizing key information, the framework of EBDM in HSM was developed in the form of four general scopes. These comprised inquiring, inspecting, implementing, and integrating, which included 10 main steps and 56 sub-steps. Conclusions: The present framework provided a comprehensive guideline that can be well adapted for implementing EBDM in health systems and related organizations especially in underdeveloped and developing countries where there is usually a lag in updating and applying evidence in their decision-making process. In addition, this framework by providing a complete, well-detailed, and sequential process can be tested in the organizational decision-making process by developed countries to improve their EBDM cycle.

Effects and utility of an online forward triage tool during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: patient perspectives (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janet Michel
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Health System ◽  
Information Source ◽  
Patient Perspectives ◽  
User Friendliness ◽  
Fear And Anxiety ◽  
Mail Address ◽  
Second Wave ◽  
E Mail

BACKGROUND Background: Online forward triage tools (OFTT) or symptom checkers are being widely used during this COVID-19 pandemic. The effects and utility of such tools however, have not been widely assessed. OBJECTIVE Objective: To assess the effects (quantitatively) and the utility (qualitatively) of a COVID-19 OFTT in a pandemic context, exploring patient perspectives as well as eliciting recommendations for tool improvement. METHODS Methods: We employed a mixed-method sequential explanatory study design. Quantitative data of all users of the OFTT between March 2nd, 2020 and May 12th, 2020 were collected. A follow-up survey of people who consented to participation was conducted. Secondly, qualitative data was collected through key informant interviews (n=19) to explain the quantitative findings, as well as explore tool utility, user experience and elicit recommendations. RESULTS Results: An estimate of the effects, (quantitatively) and the utility (qualitatively) of a COVID-19 OFTT in a pandemic context, and recommendations for tool improvement. In the study period, 6,272 users consulted our OFTT; 560 participants consented to a follow-up survey and provided a valid e-mail address. 176 (31.4%) participants returned a complete follow-up questionnaire. 85.2% followed the recommendations given. 41.5% reported that their fear was allayed after using tool and 41.1% would have contacted the GP or visited a hospital had the tool not existed. Qualitatively, seven overarching themes emerged namely i) accessibility of tool, ii) user-friendliness of tool, iii) utility of tool as an information source, iv) utility of tool in allaying fear and anxiety, v) utility of tool in decision making (test or not to test), vi) utility of tool in reducing the potential for onward transmissions (preventing cross infection) and vii) utility of tool in reducing health system burden. CONCLUSIONS Conclusion: Our findings demonstrated that a COVID-19 OFTT does not only reduce the health system burden, but can also serve as an information source, reduce anxiety and fear, reduce cross infections and facilitate decision making (to test or not to test). Further studies are needed to assess the transferability of these COVID-19 OFTT findings to other contexts as the second wave sweeps across Europe.

scholarly journals Cognitive biases, environmental, patient and personal factors associated with critical care decision making: A scoping review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iris E. Beldhuis ◽  
Ramesh S. Marapin ◽  
You Yuan Jiang ◽  
Nádia F. Simões de Souza ◽  
Artemis Georgiou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Cognitive Biases ◽  
Personal Factors ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Care Decision

scholarly journals Strategies for reducing out of pocket payments in the health system: a scoping review

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Faride Sadat Jalali ◽  
Parisa Bikineh ◽  
Sajad Delavari
Keyword(s):  
Health System ◽  
Health Systems ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Health Financing ◽  
Developed Countries ◽  
Vulnerable Groups ◽  
System A ◽  
Out Of Pocket Payments ◽  
Review Study ◽  
Developing And Developed Countries

Abstract Background Direct out-of-pocket payments (OOP) are among the most important financing mechanisms in many health systems, especially in developing countries, adversely affecting equality and leading vulnerable groups to poverty. Therefore, this scoping review study was conducted to identify the strategies involving OOP reduction in health systems. Methods Articles published in English on strategies related to out-of-pocket payments were Searched and retrieved in the Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and Embase databases between January 2000 and November 2020, following PRISMA guidelines. As a result, 3710 papers were retrieved initially, and 40 were selected for full-text assessment. Results Out of 40 papers included, 22 (55%) and 18 (45%) of the study were conducted in developing and developed countries, respectively. The strategies were divided into four categories based on health system functions: health system stewardship, creating resources, health financing mechanisms, and delivering health services.As well, developing and developed countries applied different types of strategies to reduce OOP. Conclusion The present review identified some strategies that affect the OOP payments According to the health system functions framework. Considering the importance of stewardship, creating resources, the health financing mechanisms, and delivering health services in reducing OOP, this study could help policymakers make better decisions for reducing OOP expenditures.

scholarly journals Current Status and Future Prospects for Shared Decision Making before and after Total Knee Replacement Surgery—A Scoping Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 668
Author(s):  
Geert van der Sluis ◽  
Jelmer Jager ◽  
Ilona Punt ◽  
Alexandra Goldbohm ◽  
Marjan J. Meinders ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Total Knee Replacement ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Knee Replacement ◽  
Study Design ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Decision Aids ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Total Knee

Background. To gain insight into the current state-of-the-art of shared decision making (SDM) during decisions related to pre and postoperative care process regarding primary total knee replacement (TKR). Methods. A scoping review was performed to synthesize existing scientific research regarding (1) decisional needs and preferences of patients preparing for, undergoing and recovering from TKR surgery, (2) the relation between TKR decision-support interventions and SDM elements (i.e., team talk, option talk, and decision talk), (3) the extent to which TKR decision-support interventions address patients’ decisional needs and preferences. Results. 2526 articles were identified, of which 17 articles met the inclusion criteria. Of the 17 articles, ten had a qualitative study design and seven had a quantitative study design. All included articles focused on the decision whether to undergo TKR surgery or not. Ten articles (all qualitative) examined patients’ decisional needs and preferences. From these, we identified four domains that affected the patients’ decision to undergo TKR: (1) personal factors, (2) external factors, (3) information sources and (4) preferences towards outcome prediction. Seven studies (5) randomized controlled trials and 2 cohort studies) used quantitative analyses to probe the effect of decision aids on SDM and/or clinical outcomes. In general, existing decision aids did not appear to be tailored to patient needs and preferences, nor were the principles of SDM well-articulated in the design of decision aids. Conclusions. SDM in TKR care is understudied; existing research appears to be narrow in scope with limited relevance to established SDM principles and the decisional needs of patients undertaking TKR surgery.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document