scholarly journals Genome-wide identification of RNA editing in seven porcine tissues by matched DNA and RNA high-throughput sequencing

Author(s):  
Yuebo Zhang ◽  
Longchao Zhang ◽  
Jingwei Yue ◽  
Xia Wei ◽  
Ligang Wang ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
AA Kliuchnikova ◽  
SA Moshkovskii

Adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing is a common mechanism of post-transcriptional modification in many metazoans including vertebrates; the process is catalyzed by adenosine deaminases acting on RNA (ADARs). Using high-throughput sequencing technologies resulted in finding thousands of RNA editing sites throughout the human transcriptome however, their functions are still poorly understood. The aim of this brief review is to draw attention of clinicians and biomedical researchers to ADAR-mediated RNA editing phenomenon and its possible implication in development of neuropathologies, antiviral immune responses and cancer.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Xie ◽  
Jinfang Zheng ◽  
Xu Hong ◽  
Xiaoxue Tong ◽  
Shiyong Liu

AbstractProtein-RNA interaction participates in many biological processes. So, studying protein–RNA interaction can help us to understand the function of protein and RNA. Although the protein–RNA 3D3D model, like PRIME, was useful in building 3D structural complexes, it can’t be used genome-wide, due to lacking RNA 3D structures. To take full advantage of RNA secondary structures revealed from high-throughput sequencing, we present PRIME-3D2D to predict binding sites of protein–RNA interaction. PRIME-3D2D is almost as good as PRIME at modeling protein–RNA complexes. PRIME-3D2D can be used to predict binding sites on PDB data (MCC = 0.75/0.70 for binding sites in protein/RNA) and transcription-wide (MCC = 0.285 for binding sites in RNA). Testing on PDB and yeast transcription-wide data show that PRIME-3D2D performs better than other binding sites predictor. So, PRIME-3D2D can be used to predict the binding sites both on PDB and genome-wide, and it’s freely available.


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 825-838
Author(s):  
Xiaoqian Liu ◽  
Shanshan Chu ◽  
Chongyuan Sun ◽  
Huanqing Xu ◽  
Jinyu Zhang ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (7) ◽  
pp. 3640-3657 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brianna L Tylec ◽  
Rachel M Simpson ◽  
Laura E Kirby ◽  
Runpu Chen ◽  
Yijun Sun ◽  
...  

Abstract Most mitochondrial mRNAs in kinetoplastids require extensive uridine insertion/deletion editing to generate translatable open reading frames. Editing is specified by trans-acting gRNAs and involves a complex machinery including basal and accessory factors. Here, we utilize high-throughput sequencing to analyze editing progression in two minimally edited mRNAs that provide a simplified system due their requiring only two gRNAs each for complete editing. We show that CYb and MURF2 mRNAs exhibit barriers to editing progression that differ from those previously identified for pan-edited mRNAs, primarily at initial gRNA usage and gRNA exchange. We demonstrate that mis-edited junctions arise through multiple pathways including mis-alignment of cognate gRNA, incorrect and sometimes promiscuous gRNA utilization and inefficient gRNA anchoring. We then examined the roles of accessory factors RBP16 and MRP1/2 in maintaining edited CYb and MURF2 populations. RBP16 is essential for initiation of CYb and MURF2 editing, as well as MURF2 editing progression. In contrast, MRP1/2 stabilizes both edited mRNA populations, while further promoting progression of MURF2 mRNA editing. We also analyzed the effects of RNA Editing Substrate Binding Complex components, TbRGG2 and GAP1, and show that both proteins modestly impact progression of editing on minimally edited mRNAs, suggesting a novel function for GAP1.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document