scholarly journals Influence of breast reconstruction on technical aspects of echocardiographic image acquisition compared with physician-assessed image quality

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joaquin Duarte Ow ◽  
Mohamad Hemu ◽  
Anel Yakupovich ◽  
Parva Bhatt ◽  
Hannah Gaddam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Image Quality ◽  
Cardiac Function ◽  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Image Acquisition ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Echocardiographic Image ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Introduction Assessment of cardiac function after treatment for breast cancer relies on interval evaluation of ventricular function through echocardiography. Women who undergo mastectomy more frequently choose to undergo breast reconstruction with implant. This could impede assessment of cardiac function in those with left-sided implant. We aimed to examine whether left-sided breast reconstruction with tissue expanders (TE) affect echo image acquisition and quality, possibly affecting clinical decision-making. Methods A retrospective case-control study was conducted in 190 female breast cancer patients who had undergone breast reconstruction with TE at an urban academic center. Echocardiographic technical assessment and image quality were respectively classified as excellent/good or adequate/technically difficult by technicians; and excellent/good or adequate/poor by 2 board-certified cardiologist readers. Likelihood ratio was used to test multivariate associations between image quality and left-sided TE. Results We identified 32 women (81.3% white; mean age 48 years) with left-sided/bilateral TE, and 158 right-sided/no TE (76.6% white, mean age 57 years). In multivariable analyses, we found a statistically significant difference in technician-assessed difficulty in image acquisition between cases and controls (p = 0.01); but no differences in physician-assessed image quality between cases and controls (p = 0.09, Pearson’s r = 0.467). Conclusions Left-sided breast TE appears to affect the technical difficulty of echo image acquisition, but not physician-assessed echo image quality. This likely means that echo technicians absorb most of the impediments associated with imaging patients with breast TE such that the presence of TE has no bearing on downstream clinical decision-making associated with echo image quality.

scholarly journals Predicting mortality in adults with suspected infection in a Rwandan hospital: an evaluation of the adapted MEWS, qSOFA and UVA scores

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. e040361
Author(s):  
Amanda Klinger ◽  
Ariel Mueller ◽  
Tori Sutherland ◽  
Christophe Mpirimbanyi ◽  
Elie Nziyomaze ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Tertiary Hospital ◽  
Early Warning Score ◽  
Receiver Operating Curve ◽  
Predictive Capacity ◽  
Suspected Infection ◽  
Significant Difference

RationaleMortality prediction scores are increasingly being evaluated in low and middle income countries (LMICs) for research comparisons, quality improvement and clinical decision-making. The modified early warning score (MEWS), quick Sequential (Sepsis-Related) Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA), and Universal Vital Assessment (UVA) score use variables that are feasible to obtain, and have demonstrated potential to predict mortality in LMIC cohorts.ObjectiveTo determine the predictive capacity of adapted MEWS, qSOFA and UVA in a Rwandan hospital.Design, setting, participants and outcome measuresWe prospectively collected data on all adult patients admitted to a tertiary hospital in Rwanda with suspected infection over 7 months. We calculated an adapted MEWS, qSOFA and UVA score for each participant. The predictive capacity of each score was assessed including sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, OR, area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) and performance by underlying risk quartile.ResultsWe screened 19 178 patient days, and enrolled 647 unique patients. Median age was 35 years, and in-hospital mortality was 18.1%. The proportion of data missing for each variable ranged from 0% to 11.7%. The sensitivities and specificities of the scores were: adapted MEWS >4, 50.4% and 74.9%, respectively; qSOFA >2, 24.8% and 90.4%, respectively; and UVA >4, 28.2% and 91.1%, respectively. The scores as continuous variables demonstrated the following AUROCs: adapted MEWS 0.69 (95% CI 0.64 to 0.74), qSOFA 0.65 (95% CI 0.60 to 0.70), and UVA 0.71 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.76); there was no statistically significant difference between the discriminative capacities of the scores.ConclusionThree scores demonstrated a modest ability to predict mortality in a prospective study of inpatients with suspected infection at a Rwandan tertiary hospital. Careful consideration must be given to their adequacy before using them in research comparisons, quality improvement or clinical decision-making.

scholarly journals Nottingham Prognostic Index Plus (NPI+): a modern clinical decision making tool in breast cancer

2014 ◽  
Vol 110 (7) ◽  
pp. 1688-1697 ◽  
Author(s):  
E A Rakha ◽  
D Soria ◽  
A R Green ◽  
C Lemetre ◽  
D G Powe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Prognostic Index ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Nottingham Prognostic Index ◽  
Decision Making Tool

scholarly journals Analysing Breast Cancer Multidisciplinary Patient Management: A Prospective Observational Evaluation of Team Clinical Decision-Making

2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 559-566 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. A. K. Gandamihardja ◽  
T. Soukup ◽  
S. McInerney ◽  
J. S. A. Green ◽  
N. Sevdalis
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Patient Management ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision

Standardized Synoptic Cancer Pathology Reports — So What and Who Cares?: A Population-Based Satisfaction Survey of 970 Pathologists, Surgeons, and Oncologists

2013 ◽  
Vol 137 (11) ◽  
pp. 1599-1602 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Lankshear ◽  
John Srigley ◽  
Thomas McGowan ◽  
Marta Yurcan ◽  
Carol Sawka
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Physician Satisfaction ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Cancer Pathology ◽  
Report Turnaround Time ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Pathology Reporting ◽  
The Impact

Context.—Cancer Care Ontario implemented synoptic pathology reporting across Ontario, impacting the practice of pathologists, surgeons, and medical and radiation oncologists. The benefits of standardized synoptic pathology reporting include enhanced completeness and improved consistency in comparison with narrative reports, with reported challenges including increased workload and report turnaround time. Objective.—To determine the impact of synoptic pathology reporting on physician satisfaction specific to practice and process. Design.—A descriptive, cross-sectional design was utilized involving 970 clinicians across 27 hospitals. An 11-item survey was developed to obtain information regarding timeliness, completeness, clarity, and usability. Open-ended questions were also employed to obtain qualitative comments. Results.—A 51% response rate was obtained, with descriptive statistics reporting that physicians perceive synoptic reports as significantly better than narrative reports. Correlation analysis revealed a moderately strong, positive relationship between respondents' perceptions of overall satisfaction with the level of information provided and perceptions of completeness for clinical decision making (r = 0.750, P < .001) and ease of finding information for clinical decision making (r = 0.663, P < .001). Dependent t tests showed a statistically significant difference in the satisfaction scores of pathologists and oncologists (t169 = 3.044, P = .003). Qualitative comments revealed technology-related issues as the most frequently cited factor impacting timeliness of report completion. Conclusion.—This study provides evidence of strong physician satisfaction with synoptic cancer pathology reporting as a clinical decision support tool in the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of cancer patients.

scholarly journals Differences in spatial distribution between WHO 2016 low-grade glioma molecular subgroups

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maarten M J Wijnenga ◽  
Sebastian R van der Voort ◽  
Pim J French ◽  
Stefan Klein ◽  
Hendrikus J Dubbink ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Spatial Distribution ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Tumor Volume ◽  
Right Hemisphere ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Low Grade Glioma ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background Several studies reported a correlation between anatomic location and genetic background of low-grade gliomas (LGGs). As such, tumor location may contribute to presurgical clinical decision-making. Our purpose was to visualize and compare the spatial distribution of different WHO 2016 gliomas, frequently aberrated single genes and DNA copy number alterations within subgroups, and groups of postoperative tumor volume. Methods Adult grade II glioma patients (WHO 2016 classified) diagnosed between 2003 and 2016 were included. Tumor volume and location were assessed with semi-automatic software. All volumes of interest were mapped to a standard reference brain. Location heatmaps were created for each WHO 2016 glioma subgroup, frequently aberrated single genes and copy numbers (CNVs), as well as heatmaps according to groups of postoperative tumor volume. Differences between subgroups were determined using voxelwise permutation testing. Results A total of 110 IDH mutated astrocytoma patients, 92 IDH mutated and 1p19q co-deleted oligodendroglioma patients, and 22 IDH wild-type astrocytoma patients were included. We identified small regions in which specific molecular subtypes occurred more frequently. IDH-mutated LGGs were more frequently located in the frontal lobes and IDH wild-type tumors more frequently in the basal ganglia of the right hemisphere. We found no localizations of significant difference for single genes/CNVs in subgroups, except for loss of 9p in oligodendrogliomas with a predilection for the left parietal lobes. More extensive resections in LGG were associated with frontal locations. Conclusions WHO low-grade glioma subgroups show differences in spatial distribution. Our data may contribute to presurgical clinical decision-making in LGG patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document