Investigation of multiple reflections and wave conversion by means of a vertical wave test (vertical seismic profiling) in southern Mississippi

Geophysics ◽  
1982 ◽  
Vol 47 (7) ◽  
pp. 977-1000 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. C. Lash
Keyword(s):  
Wave Train ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Multiple Reflections ◽  
Low Velocity ◽  
P Waves ◽  
S Waves ◽  
Seismic Profiling ◽  
Vertical Seismic Profiling ◽  
Sonic Log

A vertical wave test employing the vertical seismic profiling (VSP) technique in southern Mississippi confirmed suspicions that apparent multiple reflections might include converted waves as well as multiply reflected compressional waves. Both compressional (P) and shear (S) waves generated near the source were observed to travel to great depths, and P‐to‐S conversions were apparent in deep zones as well as shallow. P‐wave reflections were observed in agreement with predictions from synthetic records based on the sonic log. Up‐traveling P‐waves were reflected a short distance below the surface, at the base of the low‐velocity layer, and were followed as down‐traveling P‐waves to 200 ft depth by means of a vertical spread. Below 2000 ft and following the first P wave train, the predominate energy appeared to be down‐traveling P‐waves which could not be traced back to the reflection of up‐traveling P‐waves. The continuity of wavelets indicated instead that the strong down‐traveling S‐waves generated near the source produced P‐waves by S‐to‐P conversion somewhere in the zone between 800 and 1400 ft. The interference on the recordings made with an individual seismometer, or a small group of seismometers, using dynamite shots as the source was generally of a low‐frequency nature, so that the signal‐to‐noise (S/N) ratio was improved by the use of a high passband filter. The interference was greatly reduced without the need for a filter on recordings in which the source was a distributed charge of 100 ft length. The distributed charge produced much less shear‐wave energy in the P reflection band, demonstrating that the interference encountered when using a concentrated charge source was the consequence of the generation of S‐waves near the source. The distributed charges were previously chosen as a means for effectively eliminating secondary (ghost) reflections, an unwanted form of multiple reflections.

Rapid map and inversion of P-SV waves

Geophysics ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 56 (6) ◽  
pp. 859-862 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert R. Stewart
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Resolution ◽  
Seismic Data ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Rock Properties ◽  
Low Velocity ◽  
P Waves ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
Seismic Profiling ◽  
Vertical Seismic Profiling ◽  
And Inversion

Multicomponent seismic recordings are currently being analyzed in an attempt to improve conventional P‐wave sections and to find and use rock properties associated with shear waves (e.g. Dohr, 1985; Danbom and Dominico, 1986). Mode‐converted (P-SV) waves hold a special interest for several reasons: They are generated by conventional P‐wave sources and have only a one‐way travel path as a shear wave through the typically low velocity and attenuative near surface. For a given frequency, they will have a shorter wavelength than the original P wave, and thus offer higher spatial resolution; this has been observed in several vertical seismic profiling (VSP) cases (e.g., Geis et al., 1990). However, for surface seismic data, converted waves are often found to be of lower frequency than P-P waves (e.g., Eaton et al., 1991).

Shear waves, multiple reflections, and converted waves found by a deep vertical wave test (vertical seismic profiling)

Geophysics ◽  
1980 ◽  
Vol 45 (9) ◽  
pp. 1373-1411 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. C. Lash
Keyword(s):  
Traveling Waves ◽  
Wave Energy ◽  
S Wave ◽  
Multiple Reflections ◽  
P Waves ◽  
S Waves ◽  
Seismic Profiling ◽  
Vertical Seismic Profiling ◽  
Converted Waves ◽  
Set Up

Evidence that shear (S) waves are much more important in seismic surveys than currently believed was found in each of two deep well tests conducted some time ago. Wave tests were recorded along vertical lines, following procedures which are now designated “vertical seismic profiling.” The results may be divided into (1) evidence that shear (S) waves are produced by in‐hole dynamite charges and by the resulting compressional (P) waves, and (2) evidence that the S‐waves subsequently produce P‐waves. The proof of S‐wave production is quite conclusive. Even if we say that only P‐waves are set up in the immediate vicinity of the shot, some S‐waves are then generated within a radius of 10 to 100 ft to form what we will call a direct or “source S wave.” Other S‐waves are set up by conversion of P‐wave energy to S‐wave energy at interfaces hundreds and thousands of feet from the dynamite charge. In contrast to the P to S conversion, the evidence for S to P conversion is less conclusive. The source S‐wave generated near the shot was found to have a long‐period character, with many cycles which are believed to be controlled by the layering near the shot. The PS converted waves, which appear later, resemble the P‐waves that produce them. The interference to primary reflections by multiple reflections and/or converted waves produces complex signals at points deep in the well which require directional discrimination to separate up‐traveling waves from down‐traveling waves.

Interpretation of a vertical seismic profile conducted in the Columbia Plateau basalts

Geophysics ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 54 (10) ◽  
pp. 1258-1266 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Pujol ◽  
B. N. Fuller ◽  
S. B. Smithson
Keyword(s):  
Large Amplitude ◽  
Volcanic Rocks ◽  
Seismic Energy ◽  
Seismic Profile ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Low Velocity ◽  
P Waves ◽  
Seismic Reflection Data ◽  
S Waves ◽  
Columbia Plateau

Seismic reflection data are often of poor quality when recorded in areas where volcanic rocks are present at or near the surface. In order to investigate this phenomenon, a vertical seismic profiling (VSP) experiment was conducted in the Columbia Plateau basalts so that the behavior of seismic energy in subsurface volcanic rocks could be observed directly, thus giving insight into data acquisition in volcanic terrains. The lithologic section at the VSP site consists of low‐velocity (400 m/s to 900 m/s) alluvium in the uppermost 50 m, beneath which are layers of high‐velocity (about 5800 m/s), high‐density basalts interbedded with clay layers with much lower velocities (about 1700 m/s) and densities. These large velocity and density contrasts dramatically influence wave generation and propagation. In spite of the small source‐borehole offset (61 m), large‐amplitude S waves are generated by the downgoing P waves when they reach a shallow (250 m) clay‐basalt boundary. These S waves, in turn, generate strong reflected P waves when they interact with another clay layer at 500 m. On the other hand, strong primary P‐wave reflections are also present in the data but are affected by various interfering effects which reduce their amplitudes. The VSP data are also characterized by large‐amplitude reverberations caused by seismic energy trapped in the upper 250 m of the lithologic section. Reverberations are also observed in surface data recorded near the VSP site. We conclude from our analysis that volcanic rocks, at least in the Columbia Plateau, do not exhibit unusual energy transmission characteristics and that the observations can be explained in terms of the large contrast in the elastic properties of interbedded clay and basalt.

Processing, correlating, and interpreting converted shear waves from borehole data in southern Alberta

Geophysics ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 55 (6) ◽  
pp. 660-669 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. T. Geis ◽  
R. R. Stewart ◽  
M. J. Jones ◽  
P. E. Katapodis
Keyword(s):  
P Wave ◽  
Equation Modeling ◽  
S Wave ◽  
Borehole Data ◽  
P Waves ◽  
S Waves ◽  
Sonic Log ◽  
Lake Formation ◽  
Southern Alberta ◽  
The Time Domain

Borehole measurements coupled with phase information from Zoeppritz equation modeling has assisted in accurate correlation between a VSP converted S-wave section and both the surface and VSP P-wave sections from southern Alberta. For the most part, both the character and polarities of the sections agree; however, there are some differences. Some reflections are stronger and more distinct on the S-wave section than on the P-wave section. Spectral analysis of the time‐domain upgoing P-wave and S-wave energy shows that the frequency content of the S-waves is comparable to the P-waves. Thus, the slower velocity S-waves have a shorter wavelenght and provide better vertical resolution of some interfaces. Other upgoing S-wave modes can interfere with the P‐SV mode and contribute to the differences between the P- and S-wave sections. The match between P-wave and S-wave velocities ([Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]), determined from VSP traveltime inversion and the full‐waveform sonic log, is best in the Paleozoic carbonate section; there is some discrepancy in Cretaceous sandstone intervals. A basal salt unit in the Paleozoic Beaverhill Lake formation has a VSP‐determined [Formula: see text] ratio of 1.97, suggesting that salt can be distinguished from carbonates using both P-wave and S-wave velocity information in this region.

Application of mode‐converted shear waves to rock‐property estimation from vertical seismic profiling data

Geophysics ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 478-485 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hassan Ahmed
Keyword(s):  
P Wave ◽  
S Wave ◽  
Elastic Parameters ◽  
S Waves ◽  
Seismic Profiling ◽  
Vertical Seismic Profiling ◽  
Property Estimation ◽  
Abrupt Changes ◽  
Highly Correlated ◽  
Interval Velocities

Three‐component vertical seismic profiling (3-CVSP) data were acquired and processed to yield separate estimates of the compressional (P)-wave and shear (S)-wave fields. Interval velocities, [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] (of the P and S waves), are computed from the identified onset times at many seismometer positions along the borehole. The ratio [Formula: see text] is calculated and used to compute the Poisson’s ratio and the ratio of incompressibility to rigidity. In a North Sea well, the variation in these elastic parameters was highly correlated with the variation in stratigraphy. Of particular interest was the ability to indicate pore fluids such as gas or water within a reservoir. Abrupt changes of the calculated parameters can be an indicator of the gas‐water to water transition zone.

Fracture detection using P-wave and S-wave vertical seismic profiling at The Geysers

Geophysics ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 76-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. L. Majer ◽  
T. V. McEvilly ◽  
F. S. Eastwood ◽  
L. R. Myer
Keyword(s):  
Fractured Rock ◽  
Geothermal Field ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Velocity Variation ◽  
Fracture Detection ◽  
S Wave ◽  
Fracture Geometry ◽  
Seismic Profiling ◽  
Vertical Seismic Profiling ◽  
The Geysers

In a pilot vertical seismic profiling study, P-wave and cross‐polarized S-wave vibrators were used to investigate the potential utility of shear‐wave anisotropy measurements in characterizing a fractured rock mass. The caprock at The Geysers geothermal field was found to exhibit about an 11 percent velocity variation between SH-waves and SV-waves generated by rotating the S-wave vibrator orientation to two orthogonal polarizations for each survey level in the well. The effect is generally consistent with the equivalent anisotropy expected from the known fracture geometry.

Numerical simulation of azimuthal acoustic logging in a borehole penetrating a rock formation boundary

Geophysics ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 81 (3) ◽  
pp. D283-D291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng Liu ◽  
Wenxiao Qiao ◽  
Xiaohua Che ◽  
Xiaodong Ju ◽  
Junqiang Lu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Domain Model ◽  
P Wave ◽  
S Wave ◽  
Angle Variation ◽  
P Waves ◽  
Acoustic Logging ◽  
S Waves ◽  
Rock Formation ◽  
Logging Tool ◽  
Difference Time

We have developed a new 3D acoustic logging tool (3DAC). To examine the azimuthal resolution of 3DAC, we have evaluated a 3D finite-difference time-domain model to simulate a case in which the borehole penetrated a rock formation boundary when the tool worked at the azimuthal-transmitting-azimuthal-receiving mode. The results indicated that there were two types of P-waves with different slowness in waveforms: the P-wave of the harder rock (P1) and the P-wave of the softer rock (P2). The P1-wave can be observed in each azimuthal receiver, but the P2-wave appears only in the azimuthal receivers toward the softer rock. When these two types of rock are both fast formations, two types of S-waves also exist, and they have better azimuthal sensitivity compared with P-waves. The S-wave of the harder rock (S1) appears only in receivers toward the harder rock, and the S-wave of the softer rock (S2) appears only in receivers toward the softer rock. A model was simulated in which the boundary between shale and sand penetrated the borehole but not the borehole axis. The P-wave of shale and the S-wave of sand are azimuthally sensitive to the azimuth angle variation of two formations. In addition, waveforms obtained from 3DAC working at the monopole-transmitting-azimuthal-receiving mode indicate that the corresponding P-waves and S-waves are azimuthally sensitive, too. Finally, we have developed a field example of 3DAC to support our simulation results: The azimuthal variation of the P-wave slowness was observed and can thus be used to reflect the azimuthal heterogeneity of formations.

Application of instantaneous rotations to S‐wave vertical seismic profiling

Geophysics ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 62 (5) ◽  
pp. 1365-1368
Author(s):  
M. Boulfoul ◽  
Doyle R. Watts
Keyword(s):  
High Amplitude ◽  
Seismic Profile ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Petroleum Exploration ◽  
S Wave ◽  
Amplitude Variation With Offset ◽  
Seismic Profiling ◽  
Vertical Seismic Profiling ◽  
Seismic Models ◽  
Low Amplitude

The petroleum exploration industry uses S‐wave vertical seismic profiling (VSP) to determine S‐wave velocities from downgoing direct arrivals, and S‐wave reflectivities from upgoing waves. Seismic models for quantitative calibration of amplitude variation with offset (AVO) data require S‐wave velocity profiles (Castagna et al., 1993). Vertical summations (Hardage, 1983) of the upgoing waves produce S‐wave composite traces and enable interpretation of S‐wave seismic profile sections. In the simplest application of amplitude anomalies, the coincidence of high amplitude P‐wave reflectivity and low amplitude S‐wave reflectivity is potentially a direct indicator of the presence of natural gas.

Shallow near-surface effects

Geophysics ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 81 (5) ◽  
pp. T221-T231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine E. Krohn ◽  
Thomas J. Murray
Keyword(s):  
Time Delay ◽  
Velocity Gradient ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Unconsolidated Sediments ◽  
P Waves ◽  
Large Computer ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
S Waves ◽  
High Attenuation ◽  
Pulse Broadening

The top 6 m of the near surface has a surprisingly large effect on the behavior of P- and S-waves. For unconsolidated sediments, the P-wave velocity gradient and attenuation can be quite large. Computer modeling should include these properties to accurately reproduce seismic effects of the near surface. We have used reverse VSP data and computer simulations to demonstrate the following effects for upgoing P-waves. Near the surface, we have observed a large time delay, indicating low velocity ([Formula: see text]), and considerable pulse broadening, indicating high attenuation ([Formula: see text]). Consequently, shallowly buried geophones have greater high-frequency bandwidth compared with surface geophones. In addition, there is a large velocity gradient in the shallow near surface (factor of 10 in 5 m), resulting in the rotation of P-waves to the vertical with progressively smaller amplitudes recorded on horizontal phones. Finally, we have found little indication of a reflection or ghost from the surface, although downgoing reflections have been observed from interfaces within the near surface. In comparison, the following have been observed for upgoing S-waves: There is a small increase in the time delay or pulse broadening near the surface, indicating a smaller velocity gradient and less change in attenuation. In addition, the surface reflection coefficient is nearly one with a prominent surface ghost.

scholarly journals Relative moment tensors and deep Yakutat seismicity

2019 ◽  
Vol 219 (2) ◽  
pp. 1447-1462 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandre P Plourde ◽  
Michael G Bostock
Keyword(s):  
Principal Components ◽  
Moment Tensor ◽  
Synthetic Data ◽  
Principal Component ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Inversion Method ◽  
Low Velocity ◽  
Stress Regime ◽  
Moment Tensors ◽  
S Waves

SUMMARY We introduce a new relative moment tensor (MT) inversion method for clusters of nearby earthquakes. The method extends previous work by introducing constraints from S-waves that do not require modal decomposition and by employing principal component analysis to produce robust estimates of excitation. At each receiver, P and S waves from each event are independently aligned and decomposed into principal components. P-wave constraints on MTs are obtained from a ratio of coefficients corresponding to the first principal component, equivalent to a relative amplitude. For S waves we produce constraints on MTs involving three events, where one event is described as a linear combination of the other two, and coefficients are derived from the first two principal components. Nonlinear optimization is applied to efficiently find best-fitting tensile-earthquake and double-couple solutions for relative MT systems. Using synthetic data, we demonstrate the effectiveness of the P and S constraints both individually and in combination. We then apply the relative MT inversion to a set of 16 earthquakes from southern Alaska, at ∼125 km depth within the subducted Yakutat terrane. Most events are compatible with a stress tensor dominated by downdip tension, however, we observe several pairs of earthquakes with nearly antiparallel slip implying that the stress regime is heterogeneous and/or faults are extremely weak. The location of these events near the abrupt downdip termination of seismicity and the low-velocity zone suggest that they are caused by weakening via grain-size and volume reduction associated with eclogitization of the lower crustal gabbro layer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document