Interferometric application of static corrections

Geophysics ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 77 (1) ◽  
pp. Q1-Q13 ◽  
Author(s):  
David C. Henley
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Data ◽  
S Wave ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
Persistent Problem ◽  
Static Correction ◽  
Reflection Seismic ◽  
Special Cases ◽  
Surface Irregularities ◽  
Static Corrections ◽  
Surface Angle

Correcting reflection seismic data for the effects of near-surface irregularities is a persistent problem usually addressed at least partly by static corrections applied to traces. However, there are areas where static corrections are ineffective because basic assumptions are violated. The assumptions which fail most often are surface consistency and stationarity, which are central to the concept of static corrections. To address this failure, I mapped raw seismic traces into the radial trace domain and gathered the radial traces by common surface angle. Then I imposed a more general constraint, raypath consistency, which simultaneously introduces nonstationarity. Conventional static correction also assumes implicitly that reflection events consist of single discrete arrivals. This is not true, however, in regions where near-surface multipathing and scattering complicate reflection event waveforms. Borrowing from recent work in seismic inferometry, I removed the single-arrival assumption by using trace crosscorrelations to estimate and deconvolve surface functions from traces, rather than applying time shifts. The entire crosscorrelation function is used in every case, so both timing and waveform variations are removed by the deconvolution. The operation is applied in the common-angle domain, so it is raypath consistent and nonstationary. The method, dubbed “raypath interferometry,” was applied successfully to a set of 2D Arctic field data with serious surface consistency and multipath problems, and to a set of 3C 2D land data with very large S-wave receiver statics. Although intended primarily for use on seismic data for which conventional statics corrections fail, raypath interferometry can be used on any seismic data; its assumptions include single-arrival events and surface consistency as special cases.

scholarly journals Time-lapse difference static correction using prestack crosscorrelations: 4D seismic image enhancement case from Ketzin

Geophysics ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 79 (6) ◽  
pp. B243-B252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Bergmann ◽  
Artem Kashubin ◽  
Monika Ivandic ◽  
Stefan Lüth ◽  
Christopher Juhlin
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Data ◽  
Time Lapse ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Storage Site ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
Static Correction ◽  
Seismic Image ◽  
Static Corrections ◽  
4D Seismic

A method for static correction of time-lapse differences in reflection arrival times of time-lapse prestack seismic data is presented. These arrival-time differences are typically caused by changes in the near-surface velocities between the acquisitions and had a detrimental impact on time-lapse seismic imaging. Trace-to-trace time shifts of the data sets from different vintages are determined by crosscorrelations. The time shifts are decomposed in a surface-consistent manner, which yields static corrections that tie the repeat data to the baseline data. Hence, this approach implies that new refraction static corrections for the repeat data sets are unnecessary. The approach is demonstrated on a 4D seismic data set from the Ketzin [Formula: see text] pilot storage site, Germany, and is compared with the result of an initial processing that was based on separate refraction static corrections. It is shown that the time-lapse difference static correction approach reduces 4D noise more effectively than separate refraction static corrections and is significantly less labor intensive.

Pitfalls in processing near-surface reflection-seismic data: Beware of static corrections and migration

2015 ◽  
Vol 34 (11) ◽  
pp. 1382-1385 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Frei ◽  
R. Bauer ◽  
Ph. Corboz ◽  
D. Martin
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Data ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
Surface Reflection ◽  
Reflection Seismic ◽  
Static Corrections ◽  
And Migration

Twelve years of vertical birefringence in nine‐component VSP data

Geophysics ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 66 (2) ◽  
pp. 582-597 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald F. Winterstein ◽  
Gopa S. De ◽  
Mark A. Meadows
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Data ◽  
Azimuthal Anisotropy ◽  
Vertical Shear ◽  
S Wave ◽  
Seismic Profiles ◽  
Surface Reflection ◽  
Vertical Seismic Profiles ◽  
Reflection Seismic ◽  
San Andreas ◽  
Vsp Data

Since 1986, when industry scientists first publicly showed data supporting the presence of azimuthal anisotropy in sedimentary rock, we have studied vertical shear‐wave (S-wave) birefringence in 23 different wells in western North America. The data were from nine‐component vertical seismic profiles (VSPs) supplemented in recent years with data from wireline crossed‐dipole logs. This paper summarizes our results, including birefringence results in tabular form for 54 depth intervals in 19 of those 23 wells. In the Appendix we present our conclusions about how to record VSP data optimally for study of vertical birefringence. We arrived at four principal conclusions about vertical S-wave birefringence. First, birefringence was common but not universal. Second, birefringence ranged from 0–21%, but values larger than 4% occurred only in shallow formations (<1200 m) within 40 km of California’s San Andreas fault. Third, at large scales birefringence tended to be blocky. That is, both the birefringence magnitude and the S-wave polarization azimuth were often consistent over depth intervals of several tens to hundreds of meters but then changed abruptly, sometimes by large amounts. Birefringence in some instances diminished with depth and in others increased with depth, but in almost every case a layer near the surface was more birefringent than the layer immediately below it. Fourth, observed birefringence patterns generally do not encourage use of multicomponent surface reflection seismic data for finding fractured hydrocarbon reservoirs, but they do encourage use of crossed‐dipole logs to examine them. That is, most reservoirs were birefringent, but none we studied showed increased birefringence confined to the reservoir.

scholarly journals Structural analysis of S-wave seismics around an urban sinkhole: evidence of enhanced dissolution in a strike-slip fault zone

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (12) ◽  
pp. 2335-2350 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonja H. Wadas ◽  
David C. Tanner ◽  
Ulrich Polom ◽  
Charlotte M. Krawczyk
Keyword(s):  
Fault Zone ◽  
Fracture Network ◽  
Strike Slip ◽  
Strike Slip Fault ◽  
Normal Faults ◽  
S Wave ◽  
Seismic Profiles ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
Reflection Seismic ◽  
Enhanced Dissolution

Abstract. In November 2010, a large sinkhole opened up in the urban area of Schmalkalden, Germany. To determine the key factors which benefited the development of this collapse structure and therefore the dissolution, we carried out several shear-wave reflection-seismic profiles around the sinkhole. In the seismic sections we see evidence of the Mesozoic tectonic movement in the form of a NW–SE striking, dextral strike-slip fault, known as the Heßleser Fault, which faulted and fractured the subsurface below the town. The strike-slip faulting created a zone of small blocks ( < 100 m in size), around which steep-dipping normal faults, reverse faults and a dense fracture network serve as fluid pathways for the artesian-confined groundwater. The faults also acted as barriers for horizontal groundwater flow perpendicular to the fault planes. Instead groundwater flows along the faults which serve as conduits and forms cavities in the Permian deposits below ca. 60 m depth. Mass movements and the resulting cavities lead to the formation of sinkholes and dissolution-induced depressions. Since the processes are still ongoing, the occurrence of a new sinkhole cannot be ruled out. This case study demonstrates how S-wave seismics can characterize a sinkhole and, together with geological information, can be used to study the processes that result in sinkhole formation, such as a near-surface fault zone located in soluble rocks. The more complex the fault geometry and interaction between faults, the more prone an area is to sinkhole occurrence.

The domain of applicability of acoustic full-waveform inversion for marine seismic data

Geophysics ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 74 (6) ◽  
pp. WCC91-WCC103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christophe Barnes ◽  
Marwan Charara
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Data ◽  
Seismic Inversion ◽  
Three Dimensions ◽  
Acoustic Medium ◽  
Physical Parameters ◽  
S Wave ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Reflection Seismic ◽  
Wave Inversion ◽  
Full Wave

Marine reflection seismic data inversion is a compute-intensive process, especially in three dimensions. Approximations often are made to limit the number of physical parameters we invert for, or to speed up the forward modeling. Because the data often are dominated by unconverted P-waves, one popular approximation is to consider the earth as purely acoustic, i.e., no shear modulus. The material density sometimes is taken as a constant. Nonlinear waveform seismic inversion consists of iteratively minimizing the misfit between the amplitudes of the measured and the modeled data. Approximations, such as assuming an acoustic medium, lead to incorrect modeling of the amplitudes of the seismic waves, especially with respect to amplitude variation with offset (AVO), and therefore have a direct impact on the inversion results. For evaluation purposes, we have performed a series of inversions with different approximations and different constraints whereby the synthetic data set to recover is computed for a 1D elastic medium. A series of numerical experiments, although simple, help to define the applicability domain of the acoustic assumption. Acoustic full-wave inversion is applicable only when the S-wave velocity and the density fields are smooth enough to reduce the AVO effect, or when the near-offset seismograms are inverted with a good starting model. However, in many realistic cases, acoustic approximation penalizes the full-wave inversion of marine reflection seismic data in retrieving the acoustic parameters.

Multidisciplinary study of the hanging wall of the Kiirunavaara iron ore deposit, northern Sweden

Geophysics ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 77 (6) ◽  
pp. B269-B285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mai-Britt Jensen ◽  
Artem Kashubin ◽  
Christopher Juhlin ◽  
Sten-Åke Elming
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Data ◽  
Hanging Wall ◽  
Low Velocity ◽  
Contact Zones ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
Reflection Seismic ◽  
Imaging Results ◽  
Fracture Development ◽  
Weakness Zones ◽  
The Town

Potential weakness zones due to mining-related fracture development under the town of Kiruna, Sweden, have been investigated by integration of seismic, gravity, and petrophysical data. Reflection seismic data were acquired along two subparallel 2D profiles within the residential area of the town. The profiles of [Formula: see text], each oriented approximately east–west, nearly perpendicular to the general strike of the local geology, crossed several contact zones between quartz-bearing porphyries, a sequence of interchanging sedimentary rocks (siltstone, sandstone, conglomerate, and agglomerate), and metabasalt. The resulting reflection seismic sections revealed a strong east-dipping reflectivity that is imaged down to approximately 1.5 km. The location and orientation of major features agree well between the profiles and with the surface geology and known contact zones between the different rock types. Our imaging results, supported by traveltime modelling, indicate that the contact zones dip 40°–50° to the east. The deepest and the weakest reflections are associated with a [Formula: see text] dipping structure that is presumably related to the Kiirunavaara iron mineralization. Tomographic inversion of refracted arrivals revealed a more detailed image of the velocity distribution in the upper 100–200 m along the profiles, enabling us to identify near-surface low velocity zones. These could be possible weakness zones developed along the lithological contacts and within the geologic units. The structural image obtained from the seismic data was used to constrain data inversion along a 28 km long east–northeast to west–southwest-oriented gravity profile. The resulting density model indicates that the quartz-bearing porphyry in the hanging wall of the Kiirunavaara mineralization can be separated into two blocks oriented parallel to the ore body. One block has an unexpected low density, which could be an indication of extensive fracturing and deformation.

The SEAM Barrett model: strengths and weaknesses

Geophysics ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-31
Author(s):  
Heloise Lynn ◽  
Colin M. Sayers ◽  
Benjamin Roure
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Data ◽  
Fractured Reservoirs ◽  
Unconventional Reservoirs ◽  
Velocity Variation ◽  
Permian Basin ◽  
Amplitude Variation ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
Reflection Seismic ◽  
The North ◽  
Shale Reservoirs

The SEAM Barrett model was designed to model typical land basins found in the North American mid-continent that host unconventional reservoirs, such as fractured shale reservoirs. This model was used recently in several studies to assess whether shale bodies could be resolved using azimuthal 3D P-P reflection seismic data. In one study it was claimed that near-surface complexity prevents the identification of the shale bodies using azimuthal analysis and concluded that VVAz (Velocity Variation with Azimuth) and AVAz (Amplitude Variation with Azimuth) are not worth running in the Permian basin. However, another study by different authors applied a different seismic processing sequence to successfully resolve the reservoir geobodies and showed promising AVAz and VVAz results. This paper focuses on the SEAM Barrett model itself. Despite some advantages, the limitations of the Barrett model prevent conclusions to be drawn about the usefulness of VVAz and AVAz to characterize fractured reservoirs in other situations, such as the Permian Basin.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document