scholarly journals Cognitive–behavioural therapy for body dysmorphic disorder

2001 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Veale
Keyword(s):  
World Health Organization ◽  
American Psychiatric Association ◽  
Body Dysmorphic Disorder ◽  
Behavioural Therapy ◽  
World Health ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural ◽  
Icd 10 ◽  
Dsm Iv ◽  
Health Organization

The DSM–IV classification of body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) refers to an individual's preoccupation with an ‘imagined’ defect in his or her appearance or markedly excessive concern with a slight physical anomaly (American Psychiatric Association, 1994). An Italian psychiatrist, Morselli, first used the term ‘dysmorphophobia’ in 1886, although it is now falling into disuse, probably because ICD–10 (World Health Organization, 1992) has discarded it, subsuming the condition under hypochondriacal disorder.

The Classification of the Depressions

1989 ◽  
Vol 155 (4) ◽  
pp. 437-443 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Farmer ◽  
Peter McGuffin
Keyword(s):  
World Health Organization ◽  
Affective Disorder ◽  
American Psychiatric Association ◽  
Social Research ◽  
World Health ◽  
Icd 10 ◽  
Health Organization

It is 13 years since Kendell (1976) reviewed the ‘contemporary confusion’ surrounding the classification of depression. Reconsideration of this issue is now timely, especially in light of the development of the new classifications of affective disorder included in DSM–III (American Psychiatric Association, 1980), the revised version, DSM–III–R (American Psychiatric Association, 1987), and the forthcoming ICD–10 (World Health Organization, 1988). Recent activities in neurobiological, genetic and social research also bear importantly on our concepts of the aetiology of depression.

Delirium

1991 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 349-351
Author(s):  
A. S. Henderson
Keyword(s):  
World Health Organization ◽  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
American Psychiatric Association ◽  
World Health ◽  
Icd 10 ◽  
Health Organization ◽  
Research World

The etymology of delirium is highly expressive: it comes from the Latin de, meaning down or away from, and lira, a furrow or track in the fields; that is, to be off the track. The precise features of the syndrome have been specified in DSM-111-R (American Psychiatric Association, 1987) and in the Draft ICD-10 Diagnostic Criteria for Research (World Health Organization, 1990).

scholarly journals Revision of the classification of mental disorders in ICD–11 and DSM–V: work in progress

2010 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 2-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norman Sartorius
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Mental Disorders ◽  
World Health Organization ◽  
American Psychiatric Association ◽  
World Health ◽  
Dsm V ◽  
The World ◽  
Health Organization ◽  
Work Done

SummaryThis editorial summarises the work done to prepare ICD–11 and DSM–V (which should be published in 2015 and 2013 respectively). It gives a brief description of the structures that have been put in place by the World Health Organization and by the American Psychiatric Association and lists the issues and challenges that face the two organisations on their road to the revisions of the classifications. These include dilemmas about the ways of presentation of the revisions (e.g. whether dimensions should be added to categories or even replace them), about different versions of the classifications (e.g. the primary care and research versions), about ways to ensure that the best of evidence as well as experience are taken into account in drafting the revision and many other issues that will have to be resolved in the immediate future.

Screening, Assessment und Diagnostik von Delirien

Pflege ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 191-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolfgang Hasemann ◽  
Reto W. Kressig ◽  
Doris Ermini-Fünfschilling ◽  
Mena Pretto ◽  
Rebecca Spirig
Keyword(s):  
American Psychiatric Association ◽  
Confusion Assessment Method ◽  
Assessment Method ◽  
World Health ◽  
Confusion Assessment ◽  
Internationale Klassifikation Der Krankheiten ◽  
Icd 10 ◽  
Screening Assessment ◽  
Dsm Iv ◽  
Health Organization

Ein Delir ist eine akute Verschlechterung der Aufmerksamkeit und Kognition. Für die Diagnosestellung stehen zwei Klassifikationssysteme zur Verfügung: Das Diagnostische und Statistische Manual Psychischer Störungen (DSM) (American Psychiatric Association, 2000) und die Internationale Klassifikation der Krankheiten (ICD) (World Health Organization, 2006). Während sich die Kernsymptome beider Klassifikationssysteme ähneln, bedarf es für die Diagnose des Delirs nach ICD-10 zusätzlicher Kriterien: Psychomotorischer Störungen, Störungen des Schlaf-Wach-Zyklus und affektiver Störungen. Daher gilt die Diagnosestellung nach ICD als strengeres Verfahren. In Abhängigkeit der untersuchten Population werden bis zu 60% der Delirien, die mittels DSM-IV Kriterien festgestellt wurden, verpasst. Für die klinische Praxis stehen zahlreiche Screening- und Assessmentinstrumente zur Verfügung. In der Regel basieren diese auf den DSM-Kriterien. In diesem Beitrag werden zwei Instrumente vorgestellt, welche Pflegefachpersonen im Rahmen des Basler Delirmanagementprogramms des Universitätsspitals Basel, Schweiz, einsetzen. Das Screening erfolgt mittels der von Schuurmans (2001) entwickelten Delir-Beobachtungs-Screening-Skala (Delirium Observatie Screening Schaal, DOS), das Assessment mittels der von Inouye, van Dyck, Alessi, Balkin, Siegal und Horwitz (1990) entwickelten Confusion Assessment Method (CAM). Während die DOS ein reines Beobachtungsinstrument ist, benötigt die CAM ein strukturiertes Interview, klassischerweise (z.B.) den Minimentalstatus nach Folstein, Folstein und McHugh (1975). Beide Instrumente wurden mittels wissenschaftlicher Kriterien ins Deutsche übersetzt. Dieser Artikel stellt die übersetzten Versionen von DOS und CAM vor, diskutiert ihren Einsatz in einer Schweizer Risikogruppe für Delir und liefert den theoretischen Hintergrund der Diagnosestellung eines Delirs auf den Grundlagen von DSM-IV und ICD-10.

scholarly journals Clinical assessment of personality

1997 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 182-187
Author(s):  
Patricia R. Casey
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Assessment ◽  
American Psychiatric Association ◽  
Field Trials ◽  
World Health ◽  
Icd 10 ◽  
Dsm Iv ◽  
Operational Criteria ◽  
Health Organization ◽  
State Diagnosis ◽  
Level Of Agreement

The importance of personality is recognised tacitly by the development of the multiaxial classifications of ICD–10 (World Health Organization, 1992) and DSM–IV (American Psychiatric Association, 1993). The separation of axis 1 or current mental state diagnosis from axis 2, on which personality is described, is a recognition that personality is separate from other aspects of the patient's diagnostic status. Nevertheless, many clinicians are sceptical that personality can be assessed reliably and some hold that the diagnosis should be abandoned as being merely judgemental and pejorative (Lewis & Appleby, 1988). There is some basis for scepticism in respect of reliability in view of the evidence that even with operational criteria the clinical assessment of personality is not transportable, and the level of agreement between practising clinicians is much less than that achieved during field trials (Mellsop et al, 1982).

scholarly journals Introduction

1988 ◽  
Vol 152 (S1) ◽  
pp. 5-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Sartorius ◽  
A. Jablensky ◽  
J. E. Cooper ◽  
J. D. Burke
Keyword(s):  
World Health Organization ◽  
Present State ◽  
International Classification Of Diseases ◽  
World Health ◽  
The World ◽  
Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Icd 10 ◽  
International Setting ◽  
Health Organization

The purpose of this collection of papers is to describe the present state of development of Chapter V (F) of the Tenth Revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) (to be published by the World Health Organization, Geneva), and to discuss some related issues concerning psychiatric classification in an international setting.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document