scholarly journals Setting standards for physical health monitoring in patients on antipsychotics

2009 ◽  
Vol 33 (12) ◽  
pp. 451-454 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samantha Churchward ◽  
Susan M. Oxborrow ◽  
Victor O. Olotu ◽  
M. Deepak Thalitaya

Aims and MethodTo develop standards for physical health monitoring in patients on antipsychotics in a forensic environment. We reviewed recommendations for physical health checks from key publications and then agreed a consensus on what to monitor and how often.ResultsWe developed a standardised form to ensure the requisite minimum monitoring is performed when a patient is newly prescribed an antipsychotic drug or the dose is increased, when an abnormality is detected and for routine annual physical health monitoring.Clinical ImplicationsWe have produced a pragmatic solution to the gap between the recognised risks to physical health of individuals treated with antipsychotic medication and the need for clear, unambiguous standards of physical healthcare.

2010 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 130-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steve Brown ◽  
Navjyoat Chhina ◽  
Stephen Dye

Aims and methodTo describe the psychotropic medication given to 332 patients admitted consecutively to seven English psychiatric intensive care units (PICUs) by prospective, multicentre case-note analysis.ResultsOverall, 104 (32%) patients received rapid tranquillisation or zuclopenthixol acetate by intramuscular injection; 72 (23%) received more than one regular antipsychotic drug simultaneously. It was reported that 20 patients received high-dose antipsychotic medication, which was probably an underestimate. The use of these interventions varied significantly between different units.Clinical implicationsPotentially risky treatments such as forcible intramuscular medication are a standard part of PICU activity. Further work is needed to clarify the reasons behind the differences in prescribing practices between different PICUs.


BJPsych Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (S1) ◽  
pp. S323-S324
Author(s):  
Pam Hamlyn ◽  
Aaron McMenamin ◽  
Hilary Boyd ◽  
Lara Patton

AimsTo evidence that physical health monitoring during antipsychotic initiation and continued treatment within the Child and Family Clinic is current, as per the agreed Antipsychotic Medication Monitoring Schedule for Belfast Trust CAMHS (2015), supporting Quality Network for Community CAMHS(QNCC) accreditation.BackgroundThe Antipsychotic Medication Monitoring Schedule CAMHS(2015) was agreed by a working group of consultant psychiatrists and pharmacists, based on evidence from The Canadian Alliance for Monitoring Effectiveness and Safety of Antipsychotics in Children (CAMSEA), NICE Guidelines CG 185(2014), CG155(2013) and Maudsley Guidelines, and was to be located on the electronic system (PARIS).MethodIn January 2019, a list of all children/young people on antipsychotic medication was collated (n = 12). Presence of the monitoring schedule in the clinical notes or PARIS was recorded. The Electronic Care Record was reviewed for blood results and PARIS letters for documentation of physical health parameters (heart rate, blood pressure, height, weight, BMI, extrapyramidal side effects, ECG) and to identify documentation of risk/benefit review where monitoring was declined. Re-audit January 2020 (n = 9). Criteria:All patients commenced on antipsychotic medication will have baseline blood investigations and other physical health parameters documented as per the monitoring schedule. If monitoring was declined, the reason for this and indications for prescribing must be documented as a risk/benefit analysis.All patients on antipsychotic medication will be current with their physical health Monitoring Schedule.All patients will have their Monitoring Schedule completed in clinical notes or on PARIS.ResultFirst cycle results (n = 12):Baseline bloods (or documented declined) = 92%, Baseline ECG (or documented declined) = 75%Complete monitoring bloods = 33%, Physical health monitoring parameters complete = 42%Monitoring schedule present in the notes and current = 42% (0% on PARIS).Initial Recommendations: Standardised recording of monitoring using PARIS clinic letters and the schedule in front of clinical notes; Baseline ECG mandatorySecond cycle results (n = 9):Baseline bloods (or declined) = 89%, Baseline ECG (or declined) = 67%Complete monitoring bloods = 44%, Physical health monitoring parameters complete = 56%Monitoring schedule present in notes and current = 38%, Present, not current = 50% (0% on PARIS).ConclusionLower numbers at re-audit limit interpretation.Further recommendations: Antipsychotic initiation checklist; Central bloods diary for clinicians; Antipsychotic care-pathway booklet, co-produced with young people, incorporating the monitoring schedule.


Author(s):  
M. Gill ◽  
K. McKenna ◽  
M. McCauley ◽  
M. Gulzar

IntroductionPatients with major mental illness are recognised to be at risk of premature death for a multitude of reasons. This initiative aimed to improve the physical health monitoring of patients prescribed depot antipsychotic medication in a catchment area of ~36 000 in Ireland.ObjectivesInternational best practice recommends monitoring of blood tests, physical parameters such as weight, BMI, waist circumference and blood pressure, and side effects of patients prescribed antipsychotic medication. A clinic was established to target these interventions.MethodsA cohort of patients receiving antipsychotics in long-acting injectable form was chosen. A twice-yearly, multidisciplinary health monitoring clinic was established. Evaluation involved an audit of medical records which measured the proportion of those attending the clinic who had blood test monitoring and physical parameters recorded.ResultsBefore the clinic’s implementation, 30% of patients had evidence of some blood test monitoring, 9% had evidence of complete blood testing and one patient had evidence of physical health parameters having been recorded. One year after the implementation 78% of patients had evidence of some blood test monitoring, 61% had evidence of full blood test monitoring and 100% had evidence of physical parameters recorded.ConclusionsThe clinic was positively received by patients, and led to improved teamwork. Recommendations include organising concurrent psychiatric and phlebotomy clinics so that patients may avail of psychiatric review and blood testing at a single appointment. As a result of the increased focus on physical health monitoring, a similar project is planned to target all patients prescribed antipsychotics.


2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. S564-S564
Author(s):  
M. Gill ◽  
M. McCauley

IntroductionPatients with major mental illness are recognised to be at risk of premature death for a multitude of reasons. Those with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder are at highest risk.ObjectivesInternational best practice recommends monitoring of blood tests, physical parameters such as weight, BMI, waist circumference and blood pressure, and side effects of patients prescribed antipsychotic medication. A clinic was established to target these interventions.AimsThis initiative aimed to improve the physical health monitoring of patients prescribed depot antipsychotic medication in a catchment area of approximately 36,000 in Ireland.MethodsA twice-yearly, multidisciplinary monitoring clinic was established. A protocol was drawn up, following a literature review and inspection of current international guidelines, and a proforma assisted as an aide-mémoire. A self-report questionnaire, the Glasgow Antipsychotic Side Effect Scale, was used to enquire about side effects.ResultsEvaluation took place in descriptive form with audit used to examine outcomes. Full blood test monitoring improved from 9% of patients to 61% in one year, with 78% of patients having had at least one blood test recorded. Prior to the clinic's establishment, only one patient had had any physical parameters recorded, but this improved to 96% recorded after the clinics were run. Side effect documentation also improved.ConclusionsThe clinic was well-received and led to improved teamwork. Future recommendations include organising the clinic so as to include simultaneous blood testing. A similar project is being planned to target all patients attending who are prescribed antipsychotic medication.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.


BJPsych Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (S1) ◽  
pp. S222-S223
Author(s):  
Mike Smith ◽  
Mustafa Abbas

AimsThis project aimed to improve adherence to regular monitoring of the physical health of inpatients within a medium secure forensic psychiatric unit. A computerised tool to remind doctors to do checks was created, which was proposed would improve adherence.BackgroundThe physical health of people with mental health problems is of some concern, with higher rates of physical comorbidity and mortality compared to the general population.The forensic inpatient population has a high burden of both severe mental illness and physical ill health, and a high medication burden with potential adverse effects on physical health.To support the health of patients in our medium secure unit, each should routinely have three physical health checks done at least every six months. These are 1) an electrocardiogram (ECG), 2) a set of blood tests and 3) a full physical examination.MethodPatient records for 26 patients across two medium secure psychiatric wards were checked for 1) an ECG, 2) a full set of blood tests and 3) a full general physical examination within the past 6 months.A tool was created that automatically calculated the next due date for each check and colour coded which were overdue (red) or within 30 days of the due date (yellow). This tool was given to the core trainees working on these wards to help them keep track of which checks needed to be done.The records for patients on the same two wards were rechecked four months later and the adherence rates compared.ResultOn both wards, for each of the three physical health checks, a substantial improvement was seen in the proportion completed within the past 6 months.ConclusionThe tool created was a useful means of presenting, in one place, relevant information needed by doctors working in medium secure forensic wards regarding physical health checks, and drawing their attention to tasks that needed to be done. This led to an improvement in the adherence to physical health monitoring in these wards. An area for future improvement was identified regarding the unit's capacity to perform ECGs in a timely manner.


BJPsych Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (S1) ◽  
pp. S168-S168
Author(s):  
Moataz Abdelreheem ◽  
Olivia Connell ◽  
Daniel McNally ◽  
Itunuayo Veronica Ayeni ◽  
Clare Smith

AimsTo evaluate physical health monitoring standards in patients on Clozapine in the community.StandardsNICE and BNF guidelines for patients on established clozapine treatment advise annual monitoring of weight, waist circumference, pulse, blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, HbA1c, blood lipids and overall physical health assessment. Full blood count is monitored 1-4 weekly.BackgroundIn the management of schizophrenia, antipsychotic medication remains the cornerstone of treatment. Patients affected carry a significant physical health burden with a reduced life expectancy of 10-25 years. Factors that contribute include sedentary lifestyles, consequent obesity and cardiovascular disease, disengagement from health services, a higher incidence of suicide and the physical side effects of antipsychotic medication. For these reasons, comprehensive routine physical assessment of patients on antipsychotic treatment is of central importance.MethodThis audit is a retrospective study of patients known to South Kensington & Chelsea Community Mental Health Team (CMHT). Patients (n = 48) were audited from the Clozapine clinic SystemOne database over a one year period (October 2018-2019) to assess annual monitoring of full blood count (FBC), urea and electrolytes (U&Es), lipid profile, liver function tests (LFTs), HbA1C, thyroid function tests (TFTs), clozapine levels, ECG, and general physical and mental health review.ResultOf the 48 patients, one was transferred to a different service so was excluded (n = 47 total).All (100.0%) of the patients had annual FBC tests. All but one (97.9%) of the patients had a physical health review including blood pressure, pulse, weight and BMI measurement. Three quarters (74.5%) received annual U&Es and LFTs. Almost two thirds of patients had annual lipid and HBA1c screening (63.8%) and over half the cohort had annual TFTs (61.7%). Regarding annual multidisciplinary mental health review, this was performed for the majority of the patients (70.2%).Contrastingly, only a quarter of the patients received annual screening of glucose and Clozapine levels (27.7% for both). Only 12 patients had annual ECG (25.5%).ConclusionFollowing review it is clear that most parameters were monitored annually in a majority of patients. However, shortcomings were detected, specifically annual ECG and waist circumference monitoring.In order to ensure comprehensive monitoring of mental and physical health of patients on Clozapine, flow charts of tests and reviews needed for each patient were written up clearly and will be included in the management pathway for every patient on Clozapine. This was agreed to minimise missing any step, particularly annual ECGs.


BJPsych Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (S1) ◽  
pp. S348-S348
Author(s):  
Jake Scott ◽  
Jose Belda

AimsTo quantify how many patients were prescribed high dose antipsychotic treatment (HDAT) and establish whether guidance for monitoring HDAT was being followed in an Assertive Outreach Team.BackgroundSevere mental health disorders are associated with significant premature mortality, predominantly due to physical health conditions. Antipsychotic medications are associated with side effects, including metabolic syndrome and QT prolongation, which increase the risk of serious physical illness. HDAT is defined as when the total dose of antipsychotics prescribed exceeds 100% of the maximum BNF dose, if each dose is expressed a percentage of its maximum dose. There is limited evidence of clinical benefit with HDAT but an increased risk of side effects. Patients prescribed HDAT should therefore be monitored for side effects and clinical benefit. Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust developed a form specifically for this purpose, to be completed in addition to a physical health assessment.MethodAll patients on caseload were audited using the electronic notes. Current inpatients were excluded, as inpatient HDAT monitoring forms are attached to paper drug charts and therefore were not available for review.ResultA total of 61 patients were audited. Nine were excluded due to being inpatients. 16 were on community treatment orders and 26 were prescribed a long-acting antipsychotic injection. 10 were prescribed clozapine. The median number of medications prescribed was one. Four patients were prescribed HDAT ranging from 117-150% of the maximum BNF dose. Of these four, one had a HDAT form but this was out of date. 39 of 52 (75%) patients audited had had a physical health assessment in the past 12 months. Two of the 13 missing a physical health assessment were on HDAT.ConclusionPhysical health monitoring should be carried out for all patients on antipsychotics, but is particularly important for patients on HDAT. This audit identified a problem in both general physical health checks and HDAT monitoring. On discussion with the multi-disciplinary team a number of barriers to appropriate physical health monitoring were identified. There was a lack of awareness within the multi-disciplinary team that patients were receiving HDAT and regarding the implications for side effects. A reliable system to highlight the need for physical health checks was also missing and the team did not have sufficient equipment to perform the necessary checks. Identifying these barriers should enable improvements in physical health and HDAT monitoring which can be re-audited.


2010 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 91-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Gonzalez ◽  
Niyaz Ahammed ◽  
Robert Fisher

Aims and methodMental illness is associated with increased physical morbidity. We aimed to assess and improve the routine blood testing of prescribed antipsychotics in out-patients from a busy London inner city area. Audit findings were presented locally to prescribers, together with educational suggestions to improve physical health assessment.ResultsInitially, the numbers monitored were low in the overall number of 126 patients included in the first audit. Following the intervention, this improved significantly in the second audit (of 106 patients).Clinical implicationsA simple one-page monitoring prompt and an educational intervention could significantly increase the adherence to routine blood-testing guidelines. Better physical screening may help reduce physical morbidity and mortality, and improve the quality of life of individuals with mental illness.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document