The Seismic Provisions of the 1997 Uniform Building Code

2000 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert E. Bachman ◽  
David R. Bonneville
Keyword(s):  
The United States ◽  
Site Amplification ◽  
Major Elements ◽  
Building Code ◽  
Ground Acceleration ◽  
Reliability Factor ◽  
Nonstructural Components ◽  
Source Effects ◽  
Story Drift ◽  
Soil Site

Currently the most widely accepted code regulations in the United States for seismic design of structures and nonstructural components are those found in the Uniform Building Code ( UBC). The UBC seismic requirements were significantly revised in the 1997 edition. Among the issues addressed in the UBC revisions are near-source effects and ground acceleration dependent soil site amplification factors for both short- and long-period structures. Also, the design force levels in the 1997 UBC are based on strength design rather than allowable stress design, as had been used previously. Other significant changes include introduction of a redundancy/reliability factor, a more realistic consideration of story drift and deformation compatibility, and new equations for equivalent static forces for both structural and nonstructural components. This paper traces the recent history of the code development and describes the major elements of the 1997 UBC seismic provisions.

Structural performance of buildings during the 30 November 2018 M7.1 Anchorage, Alaska earthquake

2021 ◽  
pp. 875529302110435
Author(s):  
Wael M Hassan ◽  
Janise Rodgers ◽  
Christopher Motter ◽  
John Thornley
Keyword(s):  
Structural Damage ◽  
Seismic Vulnerability ◽  
The United States ◽  
Structural Performance ◽  
Single Family ◽  
Steel Buildings ◽  
Test Bed ◽  
Building Stock ◽  
Ground Acceleration ◽  
Nonstructural Components

Southcentral Alaska, the most populous region in Alaska, was violently shaken by a Mw 7.1 earthquake on 30 November 2018 at 8:29 am Alaska Standard Time. This was the largest magnitude earthquake in the United States close to a population center in over 50 years. The earthquake was 46 km deep, and the epicenter was 12 km north of Anchorage and 19 km west of Eagle River. The event affected some 400,000 residents, causing widespread damage in highways, nonstructural components, non-engineered and older buildings, and structures on poorly compacted fills. A few isolated serious injuries and partial collapses took place. Minor structural damage to code-conforming buildings was observed. A significant percentage of the structural damage was due to geotechnical failures. Building stock diversity allows use of the region as a large test bed to observe how local building practices affected earthquake damage levels. The prevailing peak ground acceleration (PGA) was 0.2–0.32 g, causing shaking intensity at most sites of 50%–60% of the ASCE 7-16 design basis earthquake acceleration. Thus, the seismic vulnerability of building stock in the region was not truly tested. Reinforced concrete buildings had minor structural damage, except in a few cases of shear wall and transfer girder shear cracking. Fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP)-retrofitted buildings performed satisfactorily. Concrete-masonry-unit (CMU) masonry buildings experienced serious structural damage in many cases, including relatively newer buildings. The earthquake caused widespread structural damage in non-engineered buildings (primarily wood and CMU masonry) that exist widely in the region, especially in Eagle River. Of these, non-engineered single-family wood buildings had the heaviest structural damage. No structural damage could be observed in steel buildings. The aftershock sequence, which included 7 M5+ and 50 M4+ events, exacerbated structural damage in all types of buildings. The present study is based on the EERI field reconnaissance mission conducted by the authors following the earthquake. Based on the observed damage and structural performance, seismic risk mitigation recommendations are suggested.

A proposed dynamic foundation factor for the National Building Code of Canada

1991 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 974-984 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamel Elhmadi ◽  
Arthur C. Heidebrecht
Keyword(s):  
Parametric Study ◽  
Site Response ◽  
Site Amplification ◽  
Building Code ◽  
Dense Sand ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Soil Deposits ◽  
Class 1 ◽  
Soil Site ◽  
Strong Ground

Results of a parametric study on site response effects due to seismic strong ground motions are used in this paper to develop a new "dynamic foundation factor" for the National Building Code of Canada. In order to capture the effect of the site resonance, the proposed dynamic foundation factor, F*, is given as a function of the ratio between the fundamental period of the building and the site period, T/Ts (i.e., F* spectra in terms of T/Ts). The parametric study results suggested that the proposed F* spectra be dependent on four different classes of soil deposits. These classes are deep cohesive (class 1), deep cohesionless (class 2), shallow cohesive and cohesionless (class 3), and dense sand (class 4). For classes 1 and 2, the F* spectra are independent of the ratio of peak acceleration to peak velocity, av, of the seismic ground motion. For classes 3 and 4, however, the F* spectra are an increasing function of the ratio a/v. A scaling multiplier is introduced to take into account the influence of level of intensity, v. The proposed dynamic foundation factor is compared with the National Building Code of Canada 1990 foundation factor. Finally, actual sites are used to check the validity and consistency of the proposed dynamic foundation factor. Key words: seismic, foundation factor, soil, site, amplification, building, shear, force, period, spectra.

Convective Storms and the Insurance Industry: Challenges and Opportunities

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirsten D. Orwig
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Tropical Cyclones ◽  
Insurance Industry ◽  
Property Values ◽  
Construction Materials ◽  
The United States ◽  
Building Code ◽  
Convective Storms ◽  
Challenges And Opportunities ◽  
Insured Loss

Convective storms affect countries worldwide, with billions in losses and dozens of fatalities every year. They are now the key insured loss driver in the United States, even after considering the losses sustained by tropical cyclones in 2017. Since 2008, total insured losses from convective storms have exceeded $10 billion per year. Additionally, these losses continue to increase year over year. Key loss drivers include increased population, buildings, vehicles, and property values. However, other loss drivers relate to construction materials and practices, as well as building code adoption and enforcement. The increasing loss trends pose a number of challenges for the insurance industry and broader society. These challenges are discussed, and some recommendations are presented.

Evaluation of floor acceleration demands from the 2017 Mexico City code seismic provisions using a continuous elastic model and records of instrumented buildings

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 213-237
Author(s):  
Miguel A Jaimes ◽  
Adrián D García-Soto
Keyword(s):  
Mexico City ◽  
Seismic Design ◽  
Soft Soil ◽  
Response Spectra ◽  
Elastic Model ◽  
Ground Acceleration ◽  
Nonstructural Components ◽  
Floor Response Spectra ◽  
Instrumented Buildings ◽  
Floor Acceleration

This study presents an evaluation of floor acceleration demands for the design of rigid and flexible acceleration-sensitive nonstructural components in buildings, calculated using the most recent Mexico City seismic design provisions, released in 2017. This evaluation includes two approaches: (1) a simplified continuous elastic model and (2) using recordings from 10 instrumented buildings located in Mexico City. The study found that peak floor elastic acceleration demands imposed on rigid nonstructural components into buildings situated in Mexico City might reach values of 4.8 and 6.4 times the peak ground acceleration at rock and soft sites, respectively. The peak elastic acceleration demands imposed on flexible nonstructural components in all floors, estimated using floor response spectra, might be four times larger than the maximum acceleration of the floor at the point of support of the component for buildings located in rock and soft soil. Comparison of results from the two approaches with the current seismic design provisions revealed that the peak acceleration demands and floor response spectra computed with the current 2017 Mexico City seismic design provisions are, in general, adequate.

Model Code Design Force Provisions for Elements of Structures and Nonstructural Components

2000 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard M. Drake ◽  
Leo J. Bragagnolo
Keyword(s):  
Building Code ◽  
Code Design ◽  
Structural System ◽  
Nonstructural Components ◽  
Model Code ◽  
Earthquake Design ◽  
Significant Change ◽  
New Buildings

With the publication of the 1997 Uniform Building Code ( UBC) and the 1997 NEHRP Recommended Provisions for the Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures, there has been a significant change in the earthquake design force provisions for buildings, structures, elements of structures and nonstructural components. Engineers and architects need to become informed regarding a variety of earthquake design force provisions, primarily those published in the UBC and those developed as part of the NEHRP Provisions. Both sources provide design force provisions for the building structural system and separate design force provisions for elements of structures and nonstructural components. This paper describes the development, evolution, and application of the earthquake design force provisions for elements of structures and nonstructural components.

Benchmark NBC editions for seismic risk management of existing buildings in Canada

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Reza Fathi-Fazl ◽  
Bessam Kadhom ◽  
Zhen Cai ◽  
Farrokh Fazileh
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Seismic Risk ◽  
Model Building ◽  
National Research Council ◽  
The United States ◽  
Building Code ◽  
Existing Buildings ◽  
Design Standards ◽  
Multi Level ◽  
Seismic Risk Management

The National Research Council Canada recently developed a multi-criteria and multi-level framework for seismic risk management of existing buildings in Canada. One of the key criteria in this framework is benchmark NBC edition, which refers to the applicable edition of National Building Code of Canada (NBC) in which significantly improved seismic requirements were adopted and enforced. Since post-benchmark buildings are expected to demonstrate satisfactory seismic performance, they may be exempt from structural seismic risk assessment. This paper identifies benchmark NBC editions for 17 model building types in Canada. The identification starts by tracking major seismic improvements in the United States benchmark codes and standards. These improvements are then mapped to applicable NBC editions and relevant design standards. Provincial building code editions corresponding to benchmark NBC editions are also identified. The benchmark NBC editions and corresponding provincial building code editions help building owners quickly identify and exempt post-benchmark buildings with acceptable seismic risks and thus allocate resources to the buildings with potentially unacceptable seismic risks.

Copula-Based Approach to Construct a Joint Probabilistic Model of Earthquakes and Strong Winds

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (04) ◽  
pp. 1950046 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hong-Nan Li ◽  
Xiao-Wei Zheng ◽  
Chao Li
Keyword(s):  
Structural Response ◽  
Distribution Functions ◽  
Cumulative Distribution ◽  
Strong Wind ◽  
Engineering Structures ◽  
Ground Acceleration ◽  
Multiple Hazards ◽  
Story Drift ◽  
Strong Winds ◽  
Extreme Hazards

Current structural design codes usually treat multiple hazards separately, and probabilistic backbones are rare for extreme hazard combinations, e.g., earthquake and strong wind, which may cause unforeseen damage to engineering structures exposed to multiple extreme hazards during their lifecycles. This study presents an innovative copula-based approach to construct the joint cumulative distribution function (JCDF) of the peak ground acceleration (PGA) and strong wind speed ([Formula: see text]). Six commonly used Archimedean copulas are applied to bond the JCDF with the corresponding marginal cumulative distribution functions (MCDFs) of PGA and [Formula: see text]. A total of 76 low-probability-high-consequence extreme events with a simultaneously occurring earthquake and strong wind are abstracted from data recorded from 1971–2017 in Dali Prefecture, China. The statistical analysis results show that the Frechet and truncated Weibull distributions are the optimal expressions for the marginal distributions of PGA and [Formula: see text], respectively, while the Joe Archimedean copula can yield good JCDF estimation. Monte Carlo simulation is employed to establish a target dependent multihazard database that can be used for the performance-based design of engineering structures against multiple natural hazards. A high-rise building is used to study the performance under the multihazard of an earthquake and strong wind. The results show that the maximum inter-story drift ratio of the building under multiple hazards increases by 14.4–21.3% compared with the structural response induced by an earthquake alone.

Nonlinear site amplification model for ergodic seismic hazard analysis in Central and Eastern North America

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Youssef M. A. Hashash ◽  
Okan Ilhan ◽  
Joseph A. Harmon ◽  
Grace A. Parker ◽  
Jonathan P. Stewart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
North America ◽  
Site Response ◽  
Epistemic Uncertainty ◽  
Hazard Analysis ◽  
Reference Conditions ◽  
Site Amplification ◽  
Eastern North America ◽  
Ground Acceleration ◽  
Uncertainty Model ◽  
Nonlinear Amplification

This article presents recommendations for nonlinear site amplification models in Central and Eastern North America (CENA), which are developed from one-dimensional site response analyses results and accompanies linear site amplification model in a companion article. Two median nonlinear amplification models using identical functional forms are produced as a function of VS30 and peak ground acceleration for reference conditions ( PGAr) of VS = 3000 m/s and VS30 = 760 m/s. An epistemic uncertainty model on median nonlinear amplification is proposed as a piecewise functional form to generate reasonable variations of nonlinear amplification across the period and VS30 ranges of interest. Limitations of the models are based on both the methodology of the model derivation and assumptions of nonlinear amplification model forms.

Repeatable Source, Path, and Site Effects from the 2019 M 7.1 Ridgecrest Earthquake Sequence

2020 ◽  
Vol 110 (4) ◽  
pp. 1530-1548 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grace A. Parker ◽  
Annemarie S. Baltay ◽  
John Rekoske ◽  
Eric M. Thompson
Keyword(s):  
Los Angeles ◽  
Ground Motion ◽  
Site Response ◽  
Ground Motions ◽  
Warning System ◽  
Site Amplification ◽  
Earthquake Sequence ◽  
Ground Acceleration ◽  
Small Magnitude ◽  
Earthquake Early Warning System

ABSTRACT We use a large instrumental dataset from the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquake sequence (Rekoske et al., 2019, 2020) to examine repeatable source-, path-, and site-specific ground motions. A mixed-effects analysis is used to partition total residuals relative to the Boore et al. (2014; hereafter, BSSA14) ground-motion model. We calculate the Arias intensity stress drop for the earthquakes and find strong correlation with our event terms, indicating that they are consistent with source processes. We look for physically meaningful trends in the partitioned residuals and test the ability of BSSA14 to capture the behavior we observe in the data. We find that BSSA14 is a good match to the median observations for M>4. However, we find bias for individual events, especially those with small magnitude and hypocentral depth≥7  km, for which peak ground acceleration is underpredicted by a factor of 2.5. Although the site amplification term captures the median site response when all sites are considered together, it does not capture variations at individual stations across a range of site conditions. We find strong basin amplification in the Los Angeles, Ventura, and San Gabriel basins. We find weak amplification in the San Bernardino basin, which is contrary to simulation-based findings showing a channeling effect from an event with a north–south azimuth. This and an additional set of ground motions from earthquakes southwest of Los Angeles suggest that there is an azimuth-dependent southern California basin response related to the orientation of regional structures when ground motion from waves traveling south–north are compared with those in the east–west direction. These findings exhibit the power of large, spatially dense ground-motion datasets and make clear that nonergodic models are a way to reduce bias and uncertainty in ground-motion estimation for applications like the U.S. Geological Survey National Seismic Hazard Model and the ShakeAlert earthquake early warning System.

Evolution of Design Code Requirements for Exterior Elements and Connections

2005 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 213-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian J. Sielaff ◽  
Richard J. Nielsen ◽  
Edwin R. Schmeckpeper
Keyword(s):  
Precast Concrete ◽  
Lateral Force ◽  
Frame Structure ◽  
Building Code ◽  
Seismic Zone ◽  
Seismic Rehabilitation ◽  
Story Drift ◽  
Moment Resisting ◽  
Design Requirements ◽  
Steel Frame Structure

Seismic design requirements for precast concrete cladding panel connections have evolved significantly over the past fifty years. This paper summarizes the pertinent requirements from the Uniform Building Code from 1967 to 1997, and the International Building Code 2000. A hypothetical design illustrates how emphasis in the code has evolved for both lateral force requirements and story drift displacement requirements arriving at a balance of moderate lateral force and displacement requirements. The numerical results are based on a hypothetical case of panel connections for a ten-story moment-resisting steel frame structure built in seismic Zone 4. This historical summary is of value to designers who deal with the seismic rehabilitation of precast panel connections.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document