Dr. K. Robin Yabroff to Explore the Impact of COVID-19 on Equity and Access to Care in Keynote Address

Author(s):  
John Mckiernan-González

This article discusses the impact of George J. Sánchez’s keynote address “Working at the Crossroads” in making collaborative cross-border projects more academically legitimate in American studies and associated disciplines. The keynote and his ongoing administrative labor model the power of public collaborative work to shift research narratives. “Working at the Crossroads” demonstrated how historians can be involved—as historians—in a variety of social movements, and pointed to the ways these interactions can, and maybe should, shape research trajectories. It provided a key blueprint and key examples for doing historically informed Latina/o studies scholarship with people working outside the university. Judging by the success of Sánchez’s work with Boyle Heights and East LA, projects need to establish multiple entry points, reward participants at all levels, and connect people across generations.I then discuss how I sought to emulate George Sánchez’s proposals in my own work through partnering with labor organizations, developing biographical public art projects with students, and archiving social and cultural histories. His keynote address made a back-and-forth movement between home communities and academic labor seem easy and professionally rewarding as well as politically necessary, especially in public universities. 


2021 ◽  
pp. 135245852110053
Author(s):  
Emilio Portaccio ◽  
Mattia Fonderico ◽  
Bernhard Hemmer ◽  
Tobias Derfuss ◽  
Bruno Stankoff ◽  
...  

Background: The spread of Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) poses unique challenges in the management of people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). Objectives: To collect data about the impact of COVID-19 emergency on access to care for PwMS and on MS treatment practices. Methods: Between March and July 2020, the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ECTRIMS) promoted an online survey covering patient access to care, management of relapses and visits, disease-modifying therapy (DMT) and experience with COVID-19. Results: Three-hundred and sixty neurologists from 52 countries (68% from Europe) completed the survey. 98% reported COVID-19-related restrictions. Telemedicine was adopted to overcome the limited access to care and was newly activated (73%) or widely implemented (17%). 70% reported changes in DMT management. Interferons and glatiramer were considered safe. Dimethyl fumarate, teriflunomide and fingolimod were considered safe except for patients developing lymphopenia. No modifications were considered for natalizumab in 64%, cladribine in 24%, anti-CD20 in 22% and alemtuzumab in 17%; 18% (for alemtuzumab and cladribine) and 43% (for anti-CD20) considered postponing treatment. Conclusion: The ECTRIMS survey highlighted the challenges in keeping standards of care in clinical practice. Telemedicine clearly needs to be implemented. Gathering data on DMT safety will remain crucial to inform treatment decisions.


2016 ◽  
Vol 07 (01) ◽  
pp. 43-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Li Huang

SummaryPatient access to care and long wait times has been identified as major problems in outpatient delivery systems. These aspects impact medical staff productivity, service quality, clinic efficiency, and health-care cost.This study proposed to redesign existing patient types into scheduling groups so that the total cost of clinic flow and scheduling flexibility was minimized. The optimal scheduling group aimed to improve clinic efficiency and accessibility.The proposed approach used the simulation optimization technique and was demonstrated in a Primary Care physician clinic. Patient type included, emergency/urgent care (ER/UC), follow-up (FU), new patient (NP), office visit (OV), physical exam (PE), and well child care (WCC). One scheduling group was designed for this physician. The approach steps were to collect physician treatment time data for each patient type, form the possible scheduling groups, simulate daily clinic flow and patient appointment requests, calculate costs of clinic flow as well as appointment flexibility, and find the scheduling group that minimized the total cost.The cost of clinic flow was minimized at the scheduling group of four, an 8.3% reduction from the group of one. The four groups were: 1. WCC, 2. OV, 3. FU and ER/UC, and 4. PE and NP. The cost of flexibility was always minimized at the group of one. The total cost was minimized at the group of two. WCC was considered separate and the others were grouped together. The total cost reduction was 1.3% from the group of one.This study provided an alternative method of redesigning patient scheduling groups to address the impact on both clinic flow and appointment accessibility. Balance between them ensured the feasibility to the recognized issues of patient service and access to care. The robustness of the proposed method on the changes of clinic conditions was also discussed.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel R. Tilden ◽  
Karishma A. Datye ◽  
Daniel J. Moore ◽  
Benjamin French ◽  
Sarah S. Jaser

<b>Objective: </b>We compared the uptake of telemedicine for diabetes care across multiple demographic groups during the COVID-19 pandemic to understand the impact of telemedicine adoption on access to care. <p><b>Research Design and Methods:</b> The study analyzed demographic information of patients with type 1 diabetes seen between 1/1/2018 and 6/30/2020 at a single center. We compared the odds of completing a visit via telemedicine across multiple demographic characteristics.</p> <p><b>Results: </b>Among 28,977 patient-visits, the odds of completing a visit via telemedicine were lower among non-English-speaking (1.7% vs. 2.7%, aOR:0.45, 95% CI:0.26-0.79) and Medicaid-insured (32.0% vs. 35.9%, aOR:0.83, 95% CI:0.72-0.95) pediatric patients. No clinically significant differences were observed for other demographic factors.</p> <p><b>Conclusions: </b>Rapid transition to telemedicine did not significantly impact access to diabetes care for most demographic groups. However, disparities in access to care for historically marginalized groups merit close attention to ensure use of telemedicine does not exacerbate these inequities.</p>


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuliano Russo ◽  
Maria Luiza Levi Paim ◽  
Maria Teresa Seabra Soares de Britto e Alves ◽  
Bruno Luciano Carneiro Alves de Oliveira ◽  
Ruth Helena de Souza Britto Ferreira de Carvalho ◽  
...  

Background. Economic recessions carry an impact on population health and access to care; less is known on how health systems adapt to the conditions brought by a downturn. This particularly matters now that the COVID-19 epidemic is putting health systems under stress. Brazil is one of the world’s most affected countries, and its health system was already living the aftermath of the 2015 recession. Methods. Between 2018 and 2019 we conducted 46 semi-structured interviews with health practitioners, managers and policy-makers to explore the impact of the 2015 recession on public and private providers in prosperous (São Paulo) and impoverished (Maranhão) states in Brazil. Thematic analysis was employed to identify drivers and consequences of system adaptation and coping strategies. Nvivo software was used to aid data collection and analysis. We followed the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research to provide an account of the findings.Results. We found the concept of ‘health sector crisis’ to be politically charged among healthcare providers in São Paulo and Maranhão. Contrary to expectations, the public sector was reported to have found ways to compensate for diminishing federal funding, having outsourced services and adopted flexible – if insecure – working arrangements. Following a drop in employment and health plans, private health insurance companies streamlined their offer, at times at the expenses of coverage. Low-cost walk-in clinics were hit hard by the recession, but also credited for having moved to cater for higher-income customers in Maranhão.Conclusions. The ‘plates’ of a health system may shift and adjust in unexpected ways in response to recessions, and some of these changes might outlast the crisis. As low-income countries enter post-COVID recessions, it will be important to monitor the adjustments taking place in health systems, to ensure that past gains in access to care and job security are not eroded.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel R. Tilden ◽  
Karishma A. Datye ◽  
Daniel J. Moore ◽  
Benjamin French ◽  
Sarah S. Jaser

<b>Objective: </b>We compared the uptake of telemedicine for diabetes care across multiple demographic groups during the COVID-19 pandemic to understand the impact of telemedicine adoption on access to care. <p><b>Research Design and Methods:</b> The study analyzed demographic information of patients with type 1 diabetes seen between 1/1/2018 and 6/30/2020 at a single center. We compared the odds of completing a visit via telemedicine across multiple demographic characteristics.</p> <p><b>Results: </b>Among 28,977 patient-visits, the odds of completing a visit via telemedicine were lower among non-English-speaking (1.7% vs. 2.7%, aOR:0.45, 95% CI:0.26-0.79) and Medicaid-insured (32.0% vs. 35.9%, aOR:0.83, 95% CI:0.72-0.95) pediatric patients. No clinically significant differences were observed for other demographic factors.</p> <p><b>Conclusions: </b>Rapid transition to telemedicine did not significantly impact access to diabetes care for most demographic groups. However, disparities in access to care for historically marginalized groups merit close attention to ensure use of telemedicine does not exacerbate these inequities.</p>


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (7_suppl6) ◽  
pp. 2325967120S0048
Author(s):  
Caroline Fryar ◽  
David Wang ◽  
Christine Conroy ◽  
Mark Hopkins ◽  
Brian McCormick ◽  
...  

Objectives: The primary aim of this study was to further define the impact of socioeconomic factors on the timing of ACL reconstruction. The secondary goal was to determine if these variables were associated with bucket handle tears of the meniscus at the time of surgery. Methods: All patients undergoing ACL reconstruction at our institution from October 2015 through November 2018 were sent a survey to determine socioeconomic variables, income, primary language, and education level. A chart review was then performed for insurance status, dates of injury, first visit with orthopeadics, and surgery, intraoperative pathology, and length of follow-up. Univariate analysis was performed, as well as multivariate regression analysis to select independent predictors of outcome variables. A multiple linear regression model with stepwise backward elimination was used for continuous outcome variables. Multivariate logistic analysis was used for the presence of a bucket handle meniscal tear at the time of surgery. Results: Univariate analysis was utilized to determine how insurance type, language spoken, education level, and family income affected: (1) the time from initial injury to clinic visit, (2) number of repeat injuries, and (3) frequency of bucket-handle meniscal tears (Table 1). Speaking a language other than English was associated with significantly longer times to seeing an orthopedic surgeon, more repeat injuries, and a higher likelihood of bucket-handle meniscal tears. Lower educational level correlated with longer wait times and more bucket-handle meniscal tears. Family income level less than $100,000 per year was also associated with a greater incidence of bucket-handle meniscal tears. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to further assess for independent predictors of outcomes. Patients on Medicaid saw an orthopaedic surgeon 39.4 weeks later than those on private insurance (P=0.012). English speakers saw an orthopaedic surgeon 55.68 weeks earlier than Spanish speakers (P=0.027), and patients with a college degree saw a surgeon 36 weeks earlier than patients without a college degree (P=0.023). Non-English speakers had an increased risk of having a bucket handle tear at the time of surgery (OR=4.62; 95CI%=1.677-21.33). Patients with an annual household income less than $100,000 were more likely to have a bucket handle tear (OR=7.37; 95CI%=1.20-53.39). English speakers had an average of 0.8 less instability episodes before surgery (P<0.001); income greater than $100,000/year had 0.25 less instability episodes before surgery (P=.040). Conclusions: Patients with government insurance and who were non-English-speaking experienced later access to care and later surgery after orthopaedic surgery evaluation. Non-English-speaking patients also experienced higher rates of repeat injury, instability, and bucket handle medial meniscus tears. Patients without a college degree also experienced later access to care. Patients with a household income less than $100,000 per year experienced higher rates of instability and bucket handle medial meniscus tears. Delayed access to orthopaedic care longer than 13 weeks was associated with higher rates of meniscus tears, and after 30 weeks bucket handle meniscus tears were significantly increased. These findings may inform the orthopaedic and broader medical communities of the impact of lower socioeconomic status on patients’ access to care and higher rates of concomitant injuries.


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
M s Kendir ◽  
Mr Le Bodo ◽  
M r Breton ◽  
M r Bourgueil

Abstract The demographic and epidemiological changes orient health care services towards communities with a focus on prevention and health promotion. Moreover, in France, the rapid decline of General Practitioners affect access to care in certain areas. Thus, it has made a call for interaction of primary care (PC) services and public health which can be strengthened by the actions at the local level. In 2009, the local health contracts (Contract local de santé; CLS) were developed to foster collaborative actions on the social determinants of health and to improve access to care. Considering the critical contribution of PC in these issues, one may ask how CLS mobilized PC and facilitate linkages between actions oriented toward population and primary care. The objective of this ancillary study (part of the CloterreS project), is to explore how often and how CLS involve PC in access to care and public health related actions. A mixed-method study based on document analysis, with a random sample of 17 CLSs (N = 165) from all French regions, was developed. A quantitative analysis of the 440 forms identified in 17 CLS computed frequency of involvement of PC actors and/or PC organizations and a qualitative analysis defined typology of interactions. All CLS and 20.1% (n = 86) of the forms involved PC actors and 43.2% (n = 185) concerned access to care. Of the access to care forms, 35.7% (n = 66) concerned PC. The most common strategies related to actions on the health workforce and on planning of services. The role of primary care professionals was as the target of the action and rarely as leader and partner. PC, mostly GP’s involvement, had a big place and access to care was at the core of local health contracts. The impact of CLS as an instrument to invite interaction public health and healthcare at the local level should be further assessed. Key messages Many of the local access to care actions involved primary care professionals. The local level appears strategic to integrate public health and health services yet more evidence is needed on its role.


2009 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 996-1011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janni J. Kinsler ◽  
Sung-Jae Lee ◽  
Jennifer N. Sayles ◽  
Peter A. Newman ◽  
Allison Diamant ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document