scholarly journals Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations Among Patients With Ovarian, Primary Peritoneal, and Fallopian Tube Cancer in India: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study

2021 ◽  
pp. 849-861
Author(s):  
Sudeep Gupta ◽  
Senthil Rajappa ◽  
Suresh Advani ◽  
Amit Agarwal ◽  
Shyam Aggarwal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Family History ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Brca1 And Brca2 ◽  
Brca Mutations ◽  
Fallopian Tube Cancer ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Brca2 Mutations ◽  
Brca1 Brca2

PURPOSE There are deficient data on prevalence of germline mutations in breast cancer susceptibility genes 1 and 2 ( BRCA1/ BRCA2) in Indian patients with ovarian cancer who are not selected by clinical features. METHODS This prospective, cross-sectional, noninterventional study in nine Indian centers included patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer. The primary objective was to assess the prevalence of BRCA1/ BRCA2 mutations, and the secondary objective was to correlate BRCA1/ BRCA2 status with clinicopathologic characteristics. Mutation testing was performed by a standard next-generation sequencing assay. RESULTS Between March 2018 and December 2018, 239 patients with a median age of 53.0 (range, 23.0-86.0 years) years were included, of whom 203 (84.9%) had newly diagnosed disease, 36 (15.1%) had family history of ovarian or breast cancer, and 159 (66.5%) had serous subtype of epithelial ovarian cancer. Germline pathogenic or likely pathogenic mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 were detected in 37 (15.5%; 95% CI, 11.1 to 20.7) and 14 (5.9%; 95% CI, 3.2 to 9.6) patients, respectively, whereas variants of uncertain significance in these genes were seen in four (1.7%; 95% CI, 0.5 to 4.2) and six (2.5%; 95% CI, 0.9 to 5.4) patients, respectively. The prevalence of pathogenic or likely pathogenic BRCA mutations in patients with serous versus nonserous tumors, with versus without relevant family history, and ≤ 50 years versus > 50 years, were 40 of 159 (25.2%; 95% CI, 18.6 to 32.6) versus 11 of 80 (13.8%; 95% CI, 7.1 to 23.3; P = .0636), 20 of 36 (55.6%; 95% CI, 38.1 to 72.1) versus 41 of 203 (20.2%; 95% CI, 14.9 to 26.4; P < .0001), and 20 of 90 (22.2%; 95% CI, 14.1 to 32.2) versus 31 of 149 (20.8%; 95% CI, 14.6 to 28.2; P = .7956), respectively. CONCLUSION There is a high prevalence of pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline BRCA mutations in Indian patients with ovarian cancer.

scholarly journals Clinical and pathological characteristics of Chinese patients with BRCA related breast cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e22226-e22226
Author(s):  
A. Kwong ◽  
L. Wong ◽  
C. Wong ◽  
F. Law ◽  
E. Tang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Family History ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Brca1 And Brca2 ◽  
Brca Mutations ◽  
Mutation Carriers ◽  
History Of ◽  
Brca2 Mutations ◽  
Brca1 And Brca2 Mutations

e22226 Background: Breast cancers due to underlying germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations are associated with particular pathological features that may differ from sporadic breast cancers. We report clinical and pathologic characteristics of breast cancer in a clinical cohort of high risk Chinese women with BRCA mutations and those without mutations. Methods: 202 high risk women based on their age and family history were recruited from March 2007 to November 2008. Medical information was prospectively collected from the patients and medical records. BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations were detected using full gene sequencing and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA). Results: Of the 202 female probands tested, 25 (12.3 %) were BRCA mutation carriers of which 11 (44%) were BRCA1 and 14 (56%) were BRCA2 mutations. Breast cancer risk factors, other than family history, did not differ between carriers and non-carriers. Mutation carriers were more likely to have a familial history of breast cancer (p=0.07) and personal and family history of ovarian cancer (p=0.005; p=0.007). Other cancers found in carriers families included pancreatic, gastric, colon, lung, liver, and nasopharyngeal. 23% of women diagnosed with DCIS had BRCA mutations compared with 11.4% of those with invasive cancers. BRCA related tumors were more likely to be ER, PR and Her-2 negative (Triple negative, TN) (p= 0.006). Overall 9.6% of non-BRCA cancers were TN whereas 25.9% of BRCA cancers were TN. Prevalence of TN in BRCA1 carriers is 71% compared with 13.4% in BRCA2 carriers. BRCA1 mutation related cancers were significantly more likely to be ER negative than BRCA2 and this is only significant in those who are under 40 years of age (p=0.070). Conclusions: We have a high BRCA2 mutation rate in our cohort. BRCA related breast cancer is associated with families with increasing number of first degree relatives with breast and/or ovarian cancers and were higher for DCIS cancers. Prevalence of TN breast cancers was high compared to Caucasian cohorts. BRCA mutations were associated with pathologically, poor prognostic features (TN and high grade) especially in younger women. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

The importance of variants of unknown significance (VUS) in BRCA mutation.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e22507-e22507
Author(s):  
N Mullai
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Brca Mutation ◽  
Brca1 And Brca2 ◽  
Management Options ◽  
Brca Mutations ◽  
Variants Of Unknown Significance ◽  
Family Histories ◽  
Unknown Significance ◽  
Brca2 Mutations

e22507 Background: Genetic testing of patients for BRCA mutation may report variants of unknown significance (VUS). The use of multi-gene panels in clinical care has been increasing. Consequently, the reporting of variants of unknown significance has also increased. More than two decades of research and testing have elevated the status of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes as the most well characterized genes. However, VUS are found even in BRCA1/2 testing. This raises many ethical and policy issues including communicating the significance of the results and possible clinical management options to patients. The practicing physicians would face the ethical and potential legal burden of contacting and explaining to patients, when any role of VUS changes and gets reclassified as potentially harmful. Methods: Data were collected retrospectively from medical records of patients tested for BRCA mutations. The results of fifty-two patients were analyzed. Eight patients had BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations and twelve patients had variants of unknown significance. Results: When the results of thirteen patients with BRCA mutations with VUS were analyzed further, the variants included POLE, CHEK2, PALB2, MUTHYH, BR1P1, MSH3, ATM, RAD51C, GALNT12, etc. The age of these patients ranged from 39 years to 69 years. Four patients had ovarian cancer and eight patients had breast cancer, and one patient had both breast and ovarian cancers. The number of patients with stage IV, III, II, and I diseases were six, one, two, and two respectively. One patient had bilateral breast cancer and one patient had carcinoma in-situ. Eight patients had family histories of various cancers, including cancers of the breast, uterine, and prostate cancer. All patients were treated appropriately and three patients died due to their disease. Conclusions: Based on patients’ age, family histories, and disease characteristics BRCA mutation analyses were done. All patients tested positive for BRCA mutations and VUS were informed about their results. Variants of BRCA1 and BRCA2 occur in 2%-4% of tests depending on the laboratories, where the tests were performed. There is no concordance as to how VUS results were reported. There is conflicting evidence regarding the pathogenicity of VUS. These make clinical recommendations very complex. Based on existing guidelines, physicians can explain the details of the significance of BRCA! And BRCA2 mutations to patients with clarity. However, it is difficult and unclear to give recommendations regarding prophylactic measures, specific treatment options for BRCA mutation positive breast and ovarian cancer, follow-ups, and family testing in patients with VUS. Therefore, during BRCA testing, when VUS are reported routinely along with mutations of known significance, the treating physicians would need a better guidance to advise their patients without unduly increasing their anxiety, fear, and potential for misunderstanding.

scholarly journals Characterization of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations in a Large United States Sample

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 863-871 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sining Chen ◽  
Edwin S. Iversen ◽  
Tara Friebel ◽  
Dianne Finkelstein ◽  
Barbara L. Weber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
United States ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Family History ◽  
The United States ◽  
Brca1 And Brca2 ◽  
The Us ◽  
Brca1 Carriers ◽  
Brca2 Mutations ◽  
Brca1 And Brca2 Mutations

Purpose An accurate evaluation of the penetrance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations is essential to the identification and clinical management of families at high risk of breast and ovarian cancer. Existing studies have focused on Ashkenazi Jews (AJ) or on families from outside the United States. In this article, we consider the US population using the largest US-based cohort to date of both AJ and non-AJ families. Methods We collected 676 AJ families and 1,272 families of other ethnicities through the Cancer Genetics Network. Two hundred eighty-two AJ families were population based, whereas the remainder was collected through counseling clinics. We used a retrospective likelihood approach to correct for bias induced by oversampling of participants with a positive family history. Our approach takes full advantage of detailed family history information and the Mendelian transmission of mutated alleles in the family. Results In the US population, the estimated cumulative breast cancer risk at age 70 years was 0.46 (95% CI, 0.39 to 0.54) in BRCA1 carriers and 0.43 (95% CI, 0.36 to 0.51) in BRCA2 carriers, whereas ovarian cancer risk was 0.39 (95% CI, 0.30 to 0.50) in BRCA1 carriers and 0.22 (95% CI, 0.14 to 0.32) in BRCA2 carriers. We also reported the prospective risks of developing cancer for cancer-free carriers in 10-year age intervals. We noted a rapid decrease in the relative risk of breast cancer with age and derived its implication for genetic counseling. Conclusion The penetrance of BRCA mutations in the United States is largely consistent with previous studies on Western populations given the large CIs on existing estimates. However, the absolute cumulative risks are on the lower end of the spectrum.

scholarly journals A MOLECULAR-BASED APPROACH TO INVESTIGATE BREAST CANCER 1 AND BREAST CANCER 2 STATUS IN OVARIAN CANCER AMONG IRAQI WOMEN

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 199
Author(s):  
Muhannad Shweash ◽  
Saddam Jumaa Naseer ◽  
Maisam Khider Al-anii ◽  
Thulfiqar Fawwaz Mutar
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Gene Mutations ◽  
Healthy Controls ◽  
Brca1 And Brca2 ◽  
First Degree Relatives ◽  
Brca Gene ◽  
Brca2 Mutations ◽  
Brca1 And Brca2 Mutations

Objective: Cancer ovary is one of the fatal gynecologic malignancies worldwide. Since breast cancer (BRCA) genes are considered tumor suppressor genes and play important roles in cancer by repairing of chromosomal damage with the error repair of DNA breaks. Therefore, breast cancer 1 (BRCA1) and breast cancer 2 (BRCA2) gene mutations strongly enhance the development of ovarian cancer risk among women. Here, we report that both genes are an essential mediator of progress ovarian cancer, to determine the influence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in the improvement of ovarian cancer.Methods: A total of 25 subjects were chosen for the genetic studies, and three groups were recruited: fifteen ovarian cancer patients group, five healthy controls, and five first-degree relatives to a known case of ovarian cancer patients.Results: A genetic analysis revealed that a strong correlation exists between both gene mutations’ status in ovarian cancer, and BRCA gene mutations (185delAG, 5382insC, and 4153delA in BRCA1 and 6174delT in BRCA2) remained to establish to have a relatively high frequency among people in this study among ovarian cancer patients. Furthermore, seven patients with ovarian cancer carried all of the four investigated mutations, and five had three mutations.Conclusion: Otherwise, BRCA gene frequency showed low prevalence among first-degree relatives, and to a lesser extent among healthy controls, with only a few had all of the mutations combined. These data demonstrate for the first time a molecular link between BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in ovarian cancer progression in Iraq.

scholarly journals Management of hereditary ovarian cancer

2011 ◽  
Vol 152 (40) ◽  
pp. 1596-1608 ◽  
Author(s):  
József Gábor Joó ◽  
Szabolcs Ládi ◽  
B. Zsolt Nagy ◽  
Zoltán Langmár
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Hereditary Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Brca1 And Brca2 ◽  
Ovarian Cancers ◽  
Brca2 Mutations ◽  
Histological Phenotype ◽  
Brca1 Brca2 ◽  
Brca1 And Brca2 Mutations ◽  
High Level ◽  
Associated Tumors

Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes account for the majority of hereditary breast and ovarian cancers. Approximately 10% of cases of ovarian cancer are due to germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations has a distinct histological phenotype. This type of cancer is predominantly of serous or endometrioid histology and is high grade. Patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations should be offered risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy by age 40 years, or when childbearing is complete. Nowadays there are no differences between the treatments provided for sporadic and hereditary ovarian cancer, although there are indications that targeted therapy is effective in women with BRCA1/BRCA2-associated tumors. Retrospective studies reveal a high level of sensitivity to platinum agents in BRCA-associated tumors and initial trials show good efficacy and tolerability for polyADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors in mutation carriers with advanced ovarian cancers. These agents might also potentially be used in chemoprevention. Authors review the current management of hereditary ovarian cancer. Orv. Hetil., 2011, 152, 1596–1608.

scholarly journals Contribution of BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations to early onset breast cancer: a series from north of Morocco

BMC Cancer ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joaira Bakkach ◽  
Mohamed Mansouri ◽  
Touria Derkaoui ◽  
Ali Loudiyi ◽  
ElMostafa El Fahime ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Family History ◽  
Early Onset ◽  
Brca2 Gene ◽  
Germline Mutations ◽  
Genetic Alterations ◽  
Early Onset Breast Cancer ◽  
Brca1 And Brca2 ◽  
Brca Mutations ◽  
History Of

Abstract Background To date, the contribution of BRCA1/2 mutations in Moroccan early onset breast cancer patients remains unknown. Here we assess these genetic alterations for the first time in a cohort from North of Morocco. Methods Thirty-three patients diagnosed with breast cancer at the age of ≤40 years were recruited irrespective of breast and/or ovarian cancer family history. Coding regions and intron-exon boundaries of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes were sequenced from peripheral blood DNA using Ion Proton (Thermo Fisher Scientific) next generation sequencing platform. Results Overall, five BRCA germline mutations were identified (15.1%). The frequency of mutations among patients with family history of breast cancer was 16.7%. Three mutations were found in BRCA1 (9%) and two within the BRCA2 gene (6%). These are three frameshift mutations (c.798_799del, c.2125_2126insA, c.5116_5119delAATA), one missense (c.116G > A) and one nonsense mutation (c.289G > T). The mutation c.5116_5119delAATA has a founder effect in North Africa. Moreover, one variant of unknown significance was identified in BRCA2 (c.4090A > G). Most BRCA mutations carriers (80%) had no family history of breast cancer. Conclusion Our data do not support the hypothesis that BRCA mutations alone explain the higher frequency of breast cancer in Moroccan young women. The young age (≤40 years) for breast cancer diagnosis seems to be strongly predictive of BRCA mutation status in Moroccan patients. These results will help in decision making with regard to genetic counseling and testing in the national scale.

Frequency and spectrum of founder and non-founder BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in a large series of Russian breast cancer and ovarian cancer patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 184 (1) ◽  
pp. 229-235
Author(s):  
Anna P. Sokolenko ◽  
Tatiana N. Sokolova ◽  
Valeria I. Ni ◽  
Elena V. Preobrazhenskaya ◽  
Aglaya G. Iyevleva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Large Series ◽  
Brca1 And Brca2 ◽  
Brca2 Mutations ◽  
Brca1 And Brca2 Mutations

BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Frequency in Women Evaluated in a Breast Cancer Risk Evaluation Clinic

2002 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 994-999 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen A. Shih ◽  
Fergus J. Couch ◽  
Katherine L. Nathanson ◽  
M. Anne Blackwood ◽  
Timothy R. Rebbeck ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Breast Cancer Risk ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Risk Evaluation ◽  
Brca2 Mutation ◽  
Brca1 And Brca2 ◽  
Brca1 Mutations ◽  
Brca2 Mutations ◽  
Brca1 And Brca2 Mutations

PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in families identified in a breast cancer risk evaluation clinic. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred sixty-four families seeking breast cancer risk evaluation were screened for coding region mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 by conformation-sensitive gel electrophoresis and DNA sequencing. RESULTS: Mutations were identified in 37 families (22.6%); 28 (17.1%) had BRCA1 mutations and nine (5.5%) had BRCA2 mutations. The Ashkenazi Jewish founder mutations 185delAG and 5382insC (BRCA1) were found in 10 families (6.1%). However, 6174delT (BRCA2) was found in only one family (0.6%) despite estimates of equal frequency in the Ashkenazi population. In contrast to other series, the average age of breast cancer diagnosis was earlier in BRCA2 mutation carriers (32.1 years) than in women with BRCA1 mutations (37.6 years, P = .028). BRCA1 mutations were detected in 20 (45.5%) of 44 families with ovarian cancer and 12 (75%) of 16 families with both breast and ovarian cancer in a single individual. Significantly fewer BRCA2 mutations (two [4.5%] of 44) were detected in families with ovarian cancer (P = .01). Eight families had male breast cancer; one had a BRCA1 mutation and three had BRCA2 mutations. CONCLUSION: BRCA1 mutations were three times more prevalent than BRCA2 mutations. Breast cancer diagnosis before 50 years of age, ovarian cancer, breast and ovarian cancer in a single individual, and male breast cancer were all significantly more common in families with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, but none of these factors distinguished between BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. Evidence for reduced breast cancer penetrance associated with the BRCA2 mutation 6174delT was noted.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document