Failure of orally administered dipyridamole to enhance the antineoplastic activity of fluorouracil in combination with leucovorin in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: a prospective randomized trial.

1995 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 1201-1208 ◽  
Author(s):  
C H Köhne ◽  
W Hiddemann ◽  
J Schüller ◽  
J Weiss ◽  
H P Lohrmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Antineoplastic Activity ◽  
Nucleoside Transport ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Parameters ◽  
Significant Difference

PURPOSE A randomized trial was performed to investigate the ability of the nucleoside transport inhibitor dipyridamole (DP) to enhance the antitumor activity of fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (folinic acid [FA]). PATIENTS AND METHODS One hundred eighty-one untreated patients with advanced colorectal cancer were randomized to receive 5-FU 600 mg/m2 plus FA 300 mg/m2 on days 2 to 4 with or without DP 75 mg orally three times daily on days 1 to 5. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. Only patients with documented tumor progression before therapy were eligible. 5-FU pharmacokinetics using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) were assessed in 11 nonrandomized patients receiving paired cycles with or without DP. RESULTS One hundred seventy-four patients were assessable for toxicity and response. There was no significant difference in toxicity, except DP-related headache in 24% of patients. An objective response rate of 15% (one complete response [CR] and 13 partial responses [PRs]) for 5-FU/FA and 13% (two CRs and nine PRs) for 5-FU/FA/DP was observed. The dose-intensity of 5-FU delivered was significantly higher (1.09- to 1.16-fold) for the DP-containing arm. Pharmacokinetic parameters of 5-FU did not differ significantly, except for a prolonged half-life (t1/2) induced by DP. The median time to progression (P = .8) and the median survival time (11.6 months for 5-FU/FA v 9.3 months for 5-FU/FA/DP; P = .14, log-rank test) were not different between treatment arms. CONCLUSION Orally administered DP did not improve the antineoplastic activity of 5-FU/FA in patients with advanced colorectal cancer when used at this dose and schedule. The observed increase in 5-FU dose-intensity for FU/FA/DP was not clinically relevant.

Use of the intensity of membranous EGFR staining by immunohistochemistry to predict the efficacy of chemotherapy containing cetuximab in KRAS wild-type patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: A retrospective analysis.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 516-516
Author(s):  
Naoki Takahashi ◽  
Yasuhide Yamada ◽  
Hirokazu Taniguchi ◽  
Kohei Akiyoshi ◽  
Yoshitaka Honma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Kras Mutation ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Endoscopic Biopsy ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Mutation Status ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Kras Mutation Status

516 Background: KRAS mutation status is a strong predictive factor for anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody therapy efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). In the BOND trial, objective response rates to cetuximab in irinotecan-refractory mCRC were not significantly different based on the intensity of EGFR staining by immunohistrochemistry (IHC). However, this result was not evaluated by KRAS mutation status, so we retrospectively evaluated the relationship between the efficacy of chemotherapy containing cetuximab and the intensity of membranous EGFR staining in KRAS wild type (KRAS-WT) patients. Methods: Between August 2008 and July 2011, specimens of 391 CRC patients were collected by endoscopic biopsy or surgical resection. EGFR staining by IHC and genetic screening for KRAS status were performed and intensity of EGFR staining was scored by the Guidelines for Interpreting EGFR pharmDx, DAKO. We analyzed 94 KRAS-WT patients who received combination chemotherapy with an irinotecan-regimen plus cetuximab or cetuximab monotherapy and met the following criteria: histologically proven mCRC adenocarcinoma , at least 1 previous regimen of standard fluoropyrimidine - containing chemotherapy , ECOG PS score 0-2, and adequate hepatic and renal function. Patients were classified into 2 groups by intensity of EGFR staining: (A) absence of staining and weakly to moderately positive (IHC 1+ and IHC 2+), (B) strongly positive (IHC 3+). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and compared in Groups A and B by the log-rank test. Results: There was no significant difference in patient characteristics between the 2 groups except for primary site. The median PFS of Groups A (n=76) and B (n=18) were 5.4 months and 9.1 months (p= 0.029), the median OS was 8.1 months and 13.2 months (p=0.054) and response rate was 20.1% and 33.3%, respectively. Conclusions: In KRAS-WT patients with fluoropyrimidine-containing chemotherapy-refractory mCRC, strong intensity of EGFR staining by IHC might be predictive for efficacy of chemotherapy containing cetuximab.

Clinical efficacy and safety evaluation of nimotuzumab combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: A retrospective analysis.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15009-e15009
Author(s):  
Sai-xi Bai ◽  
Ruo-rong Zhang ◽  
Wang-hua Chen ◽  
Hongmin Dong ◽  
Gang Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Treatment Group ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Combined Therapy ◽  
Combined Treatment ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Clinical Effects ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Significant Difference

e15009 Background: To retrospectively analyze the clinical effects and safety of nimotuzumab combined with chemotherapy as the first-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC). Methods: ACRC patients treated by nimotuzumab combined with chemotherapy (40 cases) or chemotherapy alone (44 cases) were enrolled in this study. Responses were evaluated by Respond Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Adverse events were evaluated by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 3.0. Results: The combined treatment group had a slightly higher objective response rate (RR) and disease control rate (DCR) (RR: 55.0% vs 36.4%; DCR: 85.0% vs 75.0%) compared to the chemotherapy alone group, although not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.89 months in the combined treatment group and 7.86 months in the chemotherapy alone group, respectively. The median survival time was 22.32 months in the combined therapy group and 18.10 months in the chemotherapy alone group, respectively (P = 0.060). There was no statistically significant difference regarding the adverse events between these two groups. Conclusions: The nimotuzumab combined with chemotherapy had similar efficacy and safety to chemotherapy-alone treatment in ACRC. The efficacy and safety of the combined treatment should be further studied with a randomized multicentre trial with a larger number of ACRC patient.

Randomized trial assessing the addition of interferon alpha-2a to fluorouracil and leucovorin in advanced colorectal cancer. Colorectal Cancer Working Party of the United Kingdom Medical Research Council.

1996 ◽  
Vol 14 (8) ◽  
pp. 2280-2288 ◽  
Author(s):  
M T Seymour ◽  
M L Slevin ◽  
D J Kerr ◽  
D Cunningham ◽  
R D James ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Interferon Alpha ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Working Party ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Ifn Alpha ◽  
The United Kingdom

PURPOSE To determine the effects of interferon alpha-2a (IFN alpha) on the efficacy and toxicity of fluorouracil (FUra) and leucovorin (LV) in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Two hundred sixty chemotherapy-naive patients were randomized to FUra/LV alone or FUra/LV plus IFN alpha. All patients received: LV 200 mg/m2 intravenous (IV) infusion over 2 hours, then FUra 400 mg/m2 i.v. bolus plus 400 mg/m2 i.v. infusion over 22 hours, all repeated on day 2. Treatment was every 2 weeks for up to 12 cycles. Patients randomized to IFN alpha received 6 x 10(6) IU subcutaneously every 48 hours throughout. Objective response (OR) and toxicity were assessed conventionally; in addition, palliative benefit and adverse effects were assessed using quality-of-life (QoL) questionnaires. RESULTS There were no differences in OR rate, progression-free survival, or overall survival. OR rates in assessable patients were as follows: FUra/LV alone (n = 104), complete or partial response (OR) = 27%, no change (NC) = 34%; FUra/LV/IFN alpha (n = 101), OR = 28%, NC = 30%. Median survival was 10 months in both arms. Dose-limiting FUra toxicities were not significantly increased by co-administration of IFN alpha, and the delivered FUra dose-intensity was not significantly reduced. However, QoL was adversely affected: patients on IFN alpha were less likely to report improvement in pretreatment physical and psychologic symptoms, and more likely to report new or worsening symptoms. CONCLUSION IFN alpha, at a dose that impaired QoL, did not improve the efficacy of FUra/LV. The power of this trial is sufficient to exclude with 95% confidence a benefit of 15% in OR or 10 weeks in median survival. Accordingly, we cannot recommend the use of IFN alpha as a clinical modulator of FUra/LV in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer.

Cediranib Plus FOLFOX/CAPOX Versus Placebo Plus FOLFOX/CAPOX in Patients With Previously Untreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Study (HORIZON II)

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (29) ◽  
pp. 3596-3603 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paulo M. Hoff ◽  
Andreas Hochhaus ◽  
Bernhard C. Pestalozzi ◽  
Niall C. Tebbutt ◽  
Jin Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
End Points ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Duration Of Response

PurposeCediranib is a highly potent inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling with activity against all three VEGF receptors. HORIZON II [Cediranib (AZD2171, RECENTIN) in Addition to Chemotherapy Versus Placebo Plus Chemotherapy in Patients With Untreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer] assessed infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin/capecitabine and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX/CAPOX) with or without cediranib in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).Patients and MethodsEligible patients were initially randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive cediranib (20 or 30 mg per day) or placebo plus FOLFOX/CAPOX. In an early analysis of this and two other cediranib studies (HORIZON I [Cediranib Plus FOLFOX6 Versus Bevacizumab Plus FOLFOX6 in Patients With Previously Treated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer] and HORIZON III [Cediranib Plus FOLFOX6 Versus Bevacizumab Plus FOLFOX6 in Patients With Untreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer]), the 20-mg dose met the predefined criteria for continuation. Subsequent patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to the cediranib 20 mg or placebo arms. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were coprimary end points.ResultsIn all, 860 patients received cediranib 20 mg (n = 502) or placebo (n = 358). The addition of cediranib to FOLFOX/CAPOX resulted in PFS prolongation (hazard ratio [HR], 0.84; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.98; P = .0121; median PFS, 8.6 months for cediranib v 8.3 months for placebo) but had no impact on OS (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.12; P = .5707; median OS, 19.7 months for cediranib v 18.9 months for placebo). There were no significant differences in the secondary end points of objective response rate, duration of response, or liver resection rate. Median chemotherapy dose-intensity was decreased by approximately 10% in patients treated with cediranib. Adverse events (AEs) associated with cediranib were manageable.ConclusionAddition of cediranib 20 mg to FOLFOX/CAPOX resulted in a modest PFS prolongation, but no significant difference in OS. The cediranib AE profile was consistent with those from previous studies. Because of the lack of improvement in OS, cediranib plus an oxaliplatin-based regimen cannot be recommended as a treatment for patients with mCRC.

The JPJDF has Synergistic Effect with Fluoropyrimidine in the Maintenance Therapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 257-269
Author(s):  
Xiaoling Fu ◽  
Yanbo Zhang ◽  
Lisheng Chang ◽  
Dengcheng Hui ◽  
Ru Jia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Synergistic Effect ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Maintenance Treatment ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Treated Group ◽  
Induction Treatment ◽  
Chemotherapeutic Regimen ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: Maintenance chemotherapeutic regimen with low toxicity is needed for metastatic colorectal cancer. A recent patent has been issued on the spleen-strengthening and detoxification prescription (JPJDF), a traditional Chinese herbal medicinal formula with anti-angiogenesis effect. The clinical effect of JPJDF on the maintenance treatment of advanced colorectal cancer has not been evaluated. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of JPJDF in combination with fluoropyrimidine compared to fluoropyrimidine alone as maintenance therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. Methods: We applied a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, single center clinical study design. A total of 137 patients with advanced colorectal cancer were recruited. Patients received either Fluoropyrimidine (Flu-treated group, n = 68), or Fluoropyrimidine plus JPJDF (Flu-F-treated group, n = 69) as maintenance treatment after 6-cycle of FOLFOX4 or FOLFORI induction treatment. The primary endpoints were Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were safety, Performance Status (PS) score and other symptoms. Results: The endpoint of disease progression was observed in 91.7% of patients. The PFS was 5.0 months and 3.0 months in the Flu-F-treated and Flu-treated groups, respectively. The OS was 15.0 months and 9.0 months in the Flu-F-treated and Flu-treated groups, respectively. Some common symptoms, such as hypodynamia, anepithymia, dizziness and tinnitus and shortness of breath, were improved in the Flu-F-treated group. There was no significant difference in the common adverse reactions between the two groups. Conclusion: JPJDF and fluoropyrimidine have synergistic effect in the maintenance treatment of mCRC.

Impact of protracted venous infusion fluorouracil with or without interferon alfa-2b on tumor response, survival, and quality of life in advanced colorectal cancer.

1995 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 2317-2323 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Hill ◽  
A Norman ◽  
D Cunningham ◽  
M Findlay ◽  
M Watson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Symptomatic Improvement ◽  
Interferon Alfa ◽  
Life Questionnaire ◽  
European Organization ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Venous Infusion

PURPOSE The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of adding interferon alfa-2b (IFN) to protracted venous infusion fluorouracil (PVI 5-FU) from the start of treatment in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients who attended our unit with histologically confirmed advanced colorectal cancer were randomized to receive either PVI 5-FU 300 mg/m2/d via Hickman line, and IFN 5 MU subcutaneously three times weekly, or PVI 5-FU alone. Treatment was given for a maximum of two 10-week blocks, with a 2-week gap for reassessment of all parameters. Quality of life (QL) was measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) pretreatment and every 6 weeks thereafter. RESULTS A total of 160 patients were randomized, with 155 eligible for assessment. Radiologic response was observed in 43 patients (28%): 17 of 77 (22%) in the 5-FU-plus-IFN arm (all partial responses [PRs]) and 26 of 78 (33%) in the 5-FU-alone group (complete responses [CRs] and 22 PRs) (difference not significant). Symptomatic improvement occurred in the majority of patients, and equally in both arms: 61% to 80% depending on the symptom. There was no significant difference between the two groups in failure-free survival (median, 161 v 193 days) or overall survival (median, 328 v 357 days). However, patients who received IFN did experience significantly more toxicity in the form of leukopenia (P = .001), neutropenia (P = .04), mucositis (P = .008), and alopecia (P = .0002). There were no toxic deaths and few notable differences in QL between the two arms. CONCLUSION This study confirms that PVI 5-FU is effective in treating the symptoms associated with metastatic colorectal carcinoma, with only mild to moderate toxicity and maintenance of QL. IFN 5 MU three times weekly does not enhance these palliative benefits.

Fluorouracil plus racemic leucovorin versus fluorouracil combined with the pure l-isomer of leucovorin for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: a randomized phase III study.

1997 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 908-914 ◽  
Author(s):  
W Scheithauer ◽  
G Kornek ◽  
A Marczell ◽  
G Salem ◽  
J Karner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Gastrointestinal Symptoms ◽  
Dose Schedule ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Biochemical Modulation ◽  
Survival Times ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Phase Iii Study

PURPOSE To compare the efficacy and toxicity of fluorouracil (FU) and racemic leucovorin (d,l-LV) versus FU combined with the l-isomer of leucovorin (l-LV) in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 248 patients with advanced measurable colorectal cancer previously unexposed to chemotherapy were randomly assigned to treatment with either FU (400 mg/m2/d by intravenous [I.V.] infusion for 2 hours) and racemic LV (100 mg/m2/d by I.V. bolus injection) given for 5 consecutive days, or the combination of FU and the pure l-isomer of LV using the same dose schedule. In both treatment arms, courses were administered every 28 days if toxicity allowed for a total of 6 months, unless evidence of tumor progression was documented earlier. RESULTS There were no significant differences between the FU/racemic LV and the FU/l-LV arm in the overall response rate (25% v 32%), duration of response (7.2 v 8.0 months), median time to progression or death (6.25 v 8.0 months), or median overall survival time (14.5 v 15.0 months). Except for minor myeloid toxic effects associated with FU/l-LV, there was also no significant difference in terms of adverse reactions. Gastrointestinal symptoms, specifically mucasitis and diarrhea, were less frequent and less severe in both treatment arms compared with other trials with FU/racemic LV reported in the literature, which might be because of the prolonged administration of FU used in both arms. CONCLUSION The combination of FU/l-LV produced response rates, response durations, and survival times similar to those with FU/d,l-LV. Biochemical modulation of FU by either pure l-LV or racemic LV thus appears to result in equivalent clinical efficacy.

Capecitabine, an Oral Fluoropyrimidine Carbamate With Substantial Activity in Advanced Colorectal Cancer: Results of a Randomized Phase II Study

2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 1337-1345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Van Cutsem ◽  
Michael Findlay ◽  
Bruno Osterwalder ◽  
Walter Kocha ◽  
David Dalley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Effective Treatment Option ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii

PURPOSE: To evaluate in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) three treatment regimens of oral capecitabine in order to select the most appropriate regimen for testing in phase III. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three capecitabine schedules were evaluated in a randomized phase II design: arm A, 1,331 mg/m2/d bid continuously; arm B, 2,510 mg/m2/d bid intermittently (2 weeks on/1 week off); and arm C, 1,657 mg/m2/d plus oral leucovorin 60 mg/d bid intermittently (2 weeks on/1 week off). RESULTS: One hundred nine patients were randomized; 39 patients were assessable for efficacy in arm A, 34 in arm B, and 35 in arm C. Patient characteristics were balanced in the arms. Confirmed tumor responses (partial response [PR] + complete response [CR]) were reported for eight patients with two CRs (21%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 9% to 36%) in arm A, eight patients with one CR (24%; 95% CI, 11% to 41%) in arm B, and eight patients with two CRs (23%; 95% CI, 10% to 40%) in arm C. Median times to progression (TTP) in arms A, B, and C were 127, 230, and 165 days, respectively. Overall, more toxicity was seen with capecitabine plus leucovorin, particularly diarrhea and hand-foot syndrome. There was no grade 3 or 4 marrow toxicity. CONCLUSION: Capecitabine offers a new, effective treatment option as an oral single agent in advanced CRC. Promising overall response rates were reported for all three regimens. The addition of leucovorin to the intermittent regimen had no marked effect on tumor response or median TTP. The intermittent single-agent capecitabine schedule is proposed for phase III evaluation, based on considerations of toxicity, dose-intensity, response rate, and TTP.

scholarly journals Relationship between 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) dose intensity and therapeutic response in patients with advanced colorectal cancer receiving infusional therapy containing 5-FU

Cancer ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 77 (3) ◽  
pp. 441-451 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erick C. Gamelin ◽  
Etienne M. Danquechin-Dorval ◽  
Yvan F. Dumesnil ◽  
Philippe J. Maillart ◽  
M. J. Goudier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Therapeutic Response ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Dose Intensity

Intensification of Adjuvant Chemotherapy: 5-Year Results of a Randomized Trial Comparing Conventional Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide With High-Dose Mitoxantrone and Cyclophosphamide With Filgrastim in Operable Breast Cancer With 10 or More Involved Axillary Nodes

2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 612-620 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Fumoleau ◽  
Franck Chauvin ◽  
Moïse Namer ◽  
Roland Bugat ◽  
Michèle Tubiana-Hulin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Axillary Nodes ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Disease Free

PURPOSE: To determine whether intensifying the dose of adjuvant chemotherapy improves the outcome of women with primary breast cancer and 10 or more involved axillary nodes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 150) were randomized to receive either four cycles of standard doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 every 3 weeks (arm A) or four courses of intensified mitoxantrone 23 mg/m2 plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2, with filgrastim 5 g/kg/d from days 2 to 15, every 3 weeks (arm B). Disease-free survival (DFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), and overall survival (OS) were determined using life-table estimates. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in DFS (P = .44), DDFS (P = .67), or OS (P = .99) between the two groups at 5 years; DDFS was 45% (arm A) versus 50% (arm B), and DFS was 41% versus 49%, respectively. Five-year survival was similar in both arms (61% v 60%, respectively). Failure to note an intergroup difference in outcome was unrelated to relative dose-intensity. Analysis of patients with 15 or more positive nodes revealed a significant difference in 5-year DDFS (19% v 49% in arm B; P = .01). Toxicity was generally mild in both groups, with no toxic death. The incidence of febrile neutropenia was low (0.3% v 3%). Alopecia was less frequent in arm B (P < .001). CONCLUSION: This randomized trial confirms the feasibility of administering mitoxantrone 23 mg/m2 with cyclophosphamide and filgrastim. Although there was no significant difference between conventional and intensified arms at 5 years, according to subgroup analysis, intensified treatment may decrease the risk of relapse in patients with 15 or more positive nodes compared with doxorubicin an cyclophosphamide.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document